Monday, May 24, 2021

BRIBES SUCKING DEMOCRAT PARTY LAWYERS - EXPOSED! CROOKED LAWYER AMY KLOBUCHAR'S NUMEROUS CONFLICTS OF INTEREST ACROSS HER POLITICAL CAREER..... AND SHE WANTED TO BE YOUR PRESIDENT TO SUCK OFF THE BIG BOYS BETTER

 

Schweizer, author of Profiles in Corruption: Abuse of Power by America’s Progressive Elitedocumented Klobuchar’s numerous conflicts of interest across her political career.

Peter Schweizer: Politicians Need to Use ‘Breaking the News’ Exposé of Chuck Todd in Future Interviews

NEW YORK, NY - SEPTEMBER 30: NBC News Political Director and Moderator of Meet the Press NBC News Chuck Todd speaks onstage at the Road to the 2016 Election: A Campaign Preview panel presented by NBCUniversal during Advertising Week 2015 AWXII at the Times Center Stage on September 30, 2015 …
D Dipasupil/Getty Images for AWXII
5:12

Peter Schweizer, author and president of the Government Accountability Institute, said on Friday’s edition of SiriusXM’s Breitbart News Daily that politicians should ask MSNBC’s Chuck Todd about his numerous conflicts of interest as revealed in Breitbart News Editor-in-Chief Alex Marlow’s book, Breaking the News: Exposing the Establishment Media’s Hidden Deals and Secret Corruption.

Marlow revealed Chuck Todd’s political conflicts of interest in Breaking the News, which includes his renting a house to Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) and his wife’s career as a Democrat Party political consultant, including consulting for Sen. Bernie Sanders’s (I-VT) 2020 presidential campaign. Todd does not disclose his conflicts of interest related to his profession as a news media anchor and analyst while presenting himself as an objective and non-partisan operator.

Schweizer advised politicians to draw on Breaking the News‘s revelations of Chuck Todd’s financial and political conflicts of interest in future interviews with the MSNBC figure.

“Here’s what I hope — and I think — has to happen,” Schweizer remarked. “The next time Chuck Todd on his show smiles and says, ‘Well, you know, congressman or senator, this individual did a fundraiser for you. Didn’t that affect your vote?’ I hope that those individuals turn around and ask him the same question in return.”

LISTEN:

He continued, “They’re legitimate questions in both ways, but for some reason there are no watchdogs on the so-called watchdogs. There’s nobody out there other than you and Breitbart that is really holding them to account. Their colleagues aren’t going to do it, and that’s part of the problem. Again, they are the insiders. They’re not the outsiders. They haven’t been outsiders for a very long time.”

Chuck Todd’s refusal to disclose his compromised status as a news media anchor and analyst is part of a broader corruption across the news media industry, Schweizer observed. Deceptive presentations of political objectivity — as illustrated by Chuck Todd — are an essential ingredient in the recipe of news media mendacity, he added.

“The point is, the point is not that Chuck Todd can’t rent out his place,” he stated. “The point is that what journalism is all about is disclosure. … Our political leaders are required to disclose their financial ties, because we have to know what is entering into the professional decisions that they’re making. Same in the executive branch.”

Schweizer noted that Chuck Todd’s lack of disclosure of his conflicts of interest cannot be an oversight given the centrality of disclosure to journalistic ethics.

He said, “Disclosure is so important. For the life of me, the fact that there was no disclosure [when Chuck Todd was] sitting down having conversations with somebody with whom he’s had a financial relationship is absolutely shocking. This is his profession, so this is not a question of him sort of stumbling into a field and saying, ‘Oh my gosh, I should have disclosed this.’ This is what he does for a living.” 

“[Chuck Todd] should be disclosing the fact that [his] spouse is making serious money working for Bernie Sanders and Democratic causes when [he is]  interviewing Democrats and/or Republicans on national television,” he added.

Marlow highlighted Chuck Todd’s career as a political consultant for Democrats.

“Kristian Denny, who is [Chuck Todd’s] wife, is a Democrat consultant,” Marlow said. “She got paid over $90,000 from the socialist Bernie Sanders campaign, and over $1.5 million from the socialist Bernie Sanders campaign in 2016. So, she’s gotten over $2.5 million from the socialist guy, and then they don’t mention any of this, like Chuck Todd [saying], ‘Oh, and just to let you know, we got a new Porsche last year thanks to Bernie Sanders.'”

He added, “I get why they’re not disclosed, because it’s so impossibly humiliating, but it is unethical.”

Schweizer remarked, “[Breaking the News] really underscored the kind of industrial logic of the corruption that is part of the media, and what stands out in your book and what people have really come to realize is that journalists desperately want people to think they’re the outsiders, and that they’re the ones who are speaking truth to power, they’re the ones that are holding power accountable.”

“They’re not,” he continued. “They’re the ultimate insiders. They club with these people. They’re even landlords of these people. … People understand economic incentives. They understand financial ties and financial corruption, and the reason that they are going to try to desperately ignore this book is precisely because it’s so devastating.”

Schweizer, author of Profiles in Corruption: Abuse of Power by America’s Progressive Elitedocumented Klobuchar’s numerous conflicts of interest across her political career.

Breitbart News Daily broadcasts live on SiriusXM Patriot 125 weekdays from 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. Eastern.

New book claims Obama was a 'parasite' who sucked the Democratic Party dry to get reelected

Morgan Phillips

A "parasite" on the Democratic Party is how journalist Edward Isaac Dovere describes former President Obama in his forthcoming tell-all book "Battle for the Soul: Inside the Democrats' Campaign to Defeat Trump."

In a chapter entitled "Benign Neglect," Dovere writes that the section’s namesake is how Obama aides privately described his abandonment of the Democratic Party once in the White House. "‘Negligence’ might be more accurate," Dovere, writer for The Atlantic and former chief Washington correspondent for Politico, writes.

"The numbers are hard to ignore: during his eight years in office, Obama oversaw a net loss of 947 state legislative seats, 63 House seats, 11 senators, and 13 governors," he continues.

In 2008, Democrats increased their majorities in the House and Senate, delivering Obama the legislature for his first two years in office. In 2010, Republicans took the majority in the House with the Tea Party wave and Democrats maintained but shrunk their majority in the Senate. In 2014, Republicans gained control of both the House and Senate.

Dovere writes that the 44th president carried himself with a "self-assured self-regard."

OBAMA CALLED TRUMP A ‘F---ING LUNATIC,' BOOK SAYS

"Obama never built a Democratic bench and never cared to, aside from a few scattered candidates who interested him," according to the book.

Dovere writes that "defenders" of Obama have argued he didn’t want to "taint" his presidency by " mucking about in fundraising," or that he didn’t want to spoil the image voters had of him as an independent politician, or that faced with the choice to campaign or govern, he would always choose govern.

Dovere writes that during his first term, Obama used the party structure as a "host" for his next campaign.

In 2009, Obama hired his friend Tim Kaine to head the DNC, even though Kaine was also serving as governor for the first year on the job.

In a scathing passage Dovere claims Kaine was at the time "commuting two days a week to oversee the pilfering of talent, money, resources, and purpose for the Obama reelection effort that was already under way."

"In his second term, he cared about what happened to the husk as much as any parasite does," Dovere says.

Dovere pointed to the Obama team’s decision to strike a deal with the Democratic National Committee (DNC) that saddled the committee with $2.4 million in leftover debt from Obama’s 2012 election. In return, "Obama for America" gave the DNC its email list, and Obama was supposed to headline additional fundraisers.

No comments: