Sunday, July 25, 2021

HOW MANY OF CALFIORNIA'S MILLIONS OF SOON TO BE HOMELESS WILL VOTE FOR LA RAZA GAVEN NEWSOM FOR BIDEN'S OPEN BORDERS??? - Larry Elder explodes into the lead in California

S.F. THE HOME OF THE PANTHEON OF CORRUPTION: KAMALA HARRIS, NANCY PELOSI, WAR PROFITEER DIANNE FEINSTEIN AND GAVIN NEWSOM

Why San Francisco is Leading California | Tony Hall

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqSke8Z1YyM

Even more damaging for Newsom is the fact that, while a lot of voters aren’t enthused about kicking him out early, a large majority (58%) wouldn’t vote for him when he runs for reelection in 2022. Moreover, a plurality of voters gave Newsom a grade of “poor” on key issues: COVID, droughts, wildfires, and the homeless


The Homeless Crisis of Los Angeles : Exploring Skid Row

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s70osRSxZdA


Is California Over?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=teBgznnPpXM

Larry Elder explodes into the lead in California

I’ve made no secret of my support for Larry Elder. If I were still in California, I’d vote for him in a heartbeat. He’s intelligent and deeply principled, and California is in very bad shape. The good news is that I’m not the only one who likes Larry. It turns out that a lot of Californians are relieved that Bruce “Caitlyn” Jenner isn’t the only alternative to Gavin Newsom.

According to an Emerson College/Nexstar Media poll, there’s bad news for Newsom and good news for Elder. With the election coming up in September, currently, 43% of voters want to recall Newsom, while 48% want to keep him in office. If Newsom continues to re-lockdown the state, those numbers can be expected to get much closer – and the 9% of undecided voters will follow the trend.

Even more damaging for Newsom is the fact that, while a lot of voters aren’t enthused about kicking him out early, a large majority (58%) wouldn’t vote for him when he runs for reelection in 2022. Moreover, a plurality of voters gave Newsom a grade of “poor” on key issues: COVID, droughts, wildfires, and the homeless. If Newsom cherished any ideas of jumping from California to the White House, he’d better put those dreams aside.

And what about Larry Elder? It’s clear that those voters who want to get Newsom out, to the extent they’re thinking ahead, are most excited at the prospect of getting Larry in:

On the question of who they would vote for if Newsom was recalled, a majority (53%) of voters are undecided on a candidate. Within the field of candidates that currently have support, conservative talk radio host Larry Elder leads at 16%, followed by businessman John Cox, at 6%, and former San Diego mayor Kevin Faulconer, at 6%. California State Assemblyman Kevin Kiley, and former Olympian and television personality Caitlyn Jenner are at 4% each. Social media influencer Kevin Paffrath is at 2%, with the remaining 8% of voters opting to vote for someone else.

The big question to ask about Elder at this point is “What can he do if he gets into office?” The current legislature is, as it has been for a long time, a Democrat supermajority, which means that, if all the Democrats vote together, they are veto-proof.

Elder will certainly be able to roll back Newsom’s draconian lockdown policies but, when it comes to other matters. he may find himself mostly cheerleading conservative policies in the state, along with vetoing the occasional bill that isn’t veto-proof for some reason or other. He may also have some sway as a voting member of the Regents of the University of California.

And of course, Elder has the power to affect the humongous bureaucracy in California. Appointments to lead those agencies could result in significant policy changes that benefit California. However, Arnold Schwarzenegger thought he could change the bureaucracy, but it changed him, turning him from a soft Republican into a RINO. This time around, I believe Elder is made of stronger stuff and has firmer principles.

In the meantime, it’s time to think up a campaign slogan. Dwight Eisenhower scored hugely with Irving Berlin’s simple three-world slogan: “I like Ike.” While there’s nothing good to rhyme with Larry, “I like Larry” has a great alliterative quality. I’m going for it!

IMAGE: I like Larry button by Andrea Widburg


WHAT IF NAFTA JOE PUMPED $2 BILLION INTO HOUSING PEOPLE MADE HOMELESS DUE TO THE DEMOCRAT PARTY'S LONG ORCHESTRATED INVASION OF 'CHEAP' LABOR???

EVER HEARD THE WORLD 'HOMELESS' COME OUT OF THIS SOCIOPAT LAWYER'S FAT MOUTH???


Want some perspective on why so many blue sanctuary cities have so many homeless encampments hovering around?

Try the reality that illegal immigrants are routinely given free public housing by the U.S., based on the fact that they are uneducated, unskilled, and largely unemployable. Those are the criteria, and now importing poverty has never been easier. Shockingly, this comes as millions of poor Americans are out in the cold awaiting that housing that the original law was intended to help.                                                                          MONICA SHOWALTER


Biden wastes $2 billion paying contractors not to build the border wall

With a border surge now setting records, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris have admonished illegal border crossers not to enter the U.S. "Do not come, do not come," as Harris said in Guatemala. Joe has said similar things.

Republicans have complained about the warnings not being sincere. Now, a Senate Republican report shows there's proof positive of it. 

According to Fox News:

A new report by Republicans on a Senate subcommittee has concluded that the Biden administration is spending a minimum of approximately $2 billion to suspend construction of the wall at the southern border, even amid a continuing migrant crisis.

The report by the minority staff of the Government Operations and Border Management Subcommittee of the Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee found that efforts to suspend or terminate wall construction projects at the Defense Department have cost between $1.8 billion to $2 billion and the administration is spending $3 million every day.

"These interim findings show that the Biden administration’s efforts to stop border wall construction constitute significant waste of taxpayer resources," the report says. "As of the drafting of this report the Biden administration has paid border wall contractors at least $2 billion and counting to not build the border wall."

The report, by ranking member Sen. Jim Lankford, is here.

Which is pretty disgusting when you think about it. The cash was appropriated and the contracts doled out. But rather than let these items reach completion, Biden prefers to pay contract workers for doing nothing. And $2 billion is no small amount, except to a Democrat.

It also comes at an atrocious time, with illegal migrants surging the border. They're surging all right, and forcing Border Patrol agents to spend time changing diapers, while the real prize for the cartels - the transmission and distribution of illegal drugs -- has nobody watching them. Wouldn't a wall be rather useful for the Border Patrol which can't stop the human waves otherwise?

That Joe Biden would rather waste money than do anything to secure the border, such as build a wall, pretty well tells us he has no problem wasting taxpayer money in the name of Getting Trump. The double harm of a border surge and flushing money down the toilet tells us all we need to know about his sincerity of his claim to want to get control of the border. He obviously doesn't.

Public disapproval of his handling of the border is very much a reality. That would explain his lip service to border enforcement, even as the border surges. But that he would actively work to obstruct the border, even at high cost to his administration, suggests something more sinister.

Image: Screen shot. Newsreporter, via YouTube video


Another line they cut into: Illegals get free public housing as impoverished Americans wait

 

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/04/another_line_they_cut_into_illegals_get_free_public_housing_as_impoverished_americans_wait.html

 

By Monica Showalter

Want some perspective on why so many blue sanctuary cities have so many homeless encampments hovering around?

Try the reality that illegal immigrants are routinely given free public housing by the U.S., based on the fact that they are uneducated, unskilled, and largely unemployable. Those are the criteria, and now importing poverty has never been easier. Shockingly, this comes as millions of poor Americans are out in the cold awaiting that housing that the original law was intended to help.

Thus, the tent cities, and by coincidence, the worst of these emerging shantytowns are in blue sanctuary cities loaded with illegal immigrants - Orange County, San Francisco, San Diego, Seattle, New York...Is there a connection? At a minimum, it's worth looking at.

The Trump administration's Department of Housing and Urban Development is finally trying to put a stop to it as 1.5 million illegals prepare to enter the U.S. this year, and one can only wonder why they didn't do it yesterday.

According to a report in the Washington Times:

The plan would scrap Clinton-era regulations that allowed illegal immigrants to sign up for assistance without having to disclose their status.

Under the new Trump rules, not only would the leaseholder using public housing have to be an eligible U.S. person, but the government would verify all applicants through the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) database, a federal system that’s used to weed illegal immigrants out of other welfare programs.

Those already getting HUD assistance would have to go through a new verification, though it would be over a period of time and wouldn’t all come at once.

“We’ve got our own people to house and need to take care of our citizens,” an administration official told The Washington Times. “Because of past loopholes in HUD guidance, illegal aliens were able to live in free public housing desperately needed by so many of our own citizens. As illegal aliens attempt to swarm our borders, we’re sending the message that you can’t live off of American welfare on the taxpayers’ dime.”

The Times notes that the rules are confusingly contradictary, and some illegal immigrant families are getting full rides based on just one member being born in the U.S. The pregnant caravaner who calculatingly slipped across the U.S. in San Diego late last year, only to have her baby the next day, now, along with her entire family, gets that free ride on government housing. Plus lots of cheesy news coverage about how heartwarming it all is. That's a lot cheaper than any housing she's going to find back in Tegucigalpa.

Migrants would be almost fools not to take the offering.

The problem of course is that Americans who paid into these programs, and the subset who find themselves in dire circumstances, are in fact being shut out.

The fill-the-pews Catholic archbishops may love to tout the virtues of illegal immigrants and wave signs about getting 'justice" for them, but the hard fact here is that these foreign nationals are stealing from others as they take this housing benefit under legal technicalities. That's not a good thing under anyone's theological law. But hypocrisy is comfortable ground for the entire open borders lobby as they shamelessly celebrate lawbreaking at the border, leaving the impoverished of the U.S. out cold.

The Trump administration is trying to have this outrage fixed by summer. But don't imagine it won't be without the open-borders lawsuits, the media sob stories, the leftist judges, and the scolding clerics.


A Homeless Village Is Growing on Apple’s Silicon Valley Property


According to recent reports, a growing homeless encampment has been

set up on dozens of acres of undeveloped land in the heart of Silicon

Valley owned by tech giant Apple.

VICE News reports that despite Apple committing billions of dollars to fix California’s housing crisis, an encampment of homeless people living in RVs, shacks, and tents has taken over dozens of acres of undeveloped land owned by Apple in the center of Silicon Valley.

Between 30 to 100 homeless people have reportedly set up camp on the property owned by Apple in North San Jose. The area covers about 55 acres according to the local CBS affiliate KPIX. Some current residents of the site say that they feel they can be left alone there, despite the area’s proximity to PayPal’s corporate headquarters and other office buildings.

Before the start of the coronavirus pandemic, around 6,000 homeless people lived in San Jose with fewer than 1,000 beds available to them. It’s common for homeless people living outdoors and in vehicles across the Bay Area to be moved from place to place by security and police, those staying on the Apple property have largely been left alone according to Renee Corona who has lived in an RV on the property for nearly two years.

Corona, who receives disability payments but cannot afford to live in San Francisco where she was raised, stated: “This is an area where you’re secluded from the city. I don’t think a lot of people knew about this.” She added: “I’m grateful that they don’t kick us out. I just want to say thank you. They don’t bother us.”

San Jose City Council member David Cohen, whose district includes the property, told VICE News that his office is trying to schedule a meeting with Apple to discuss the site. “We’re setting up a meeting so that I can begin to talk to them about what we might be able to do to help the people who are living there, and to figure out some plan for offering services,” Cohen said.

Read more at VICE News here.

Lucas Nolan is a reporter for Breitbart News covering issues of free speech and online censorship. Follow him on Twitter @LucasNolan or contact via secure email at the address lucasnolan@protonmail.com

THESE VIDEOS SHOULD CONVINCE ANYONE OF THE DANGERS OF LETTING THE DEMOCRAT PARTY RUN THE COUNTRY.... INTO THE GROUND!

Walking Tour of Downtown Seattle in May 2021

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZAFbj-918A

Searching for Hope: Homeless in Sacramento

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TL5MROuIaGU

 

Inflation is Surging as Wages are Falling - People are Unprepared

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pu9Ad7Y3SZE

 

Is Los Angeles the worst run city in America - Homeless Update

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GeYZoWWBc4s&t=3s

 

Homeless Woman Doesn't Drink or Use Drugs. In a Tent for 8 Years.

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0kNDhSl_IyE

 

Homeless Woman Has a Masters in Mathematics and Engineering


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nT3VGI0V5Rs

  

What are you Spending Money On? - Prices Skyrocket

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0TWlhnCmvws

 

The Economy is like a Bad Magic Trick - Full of Smoke and Mirrors


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTUKpeXiB2U&t=37s

MacArthur Park Is a Complete Wreck - Hollywood Homeless Breakdown

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=81Yl97OypH0&t=32s

Chaos by the Bay: The Truth About Homelessness in San Francisco

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uw8MACDZ3RI

 

City of Roses or City of Homeless? Portland's human tragedy

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VcZvD7lKZto

 

Meet the Homeless Americans Living in Walmart Parking Lots

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h1AWLo_fK1U

 

Living on the brink: One family’s struggle to survive the pandemic

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y92ubHU_AS8

 

Feeding a family on a food stamp budget

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXKkakwf6Vk

 

This is life on $7.50 an hour

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-SCB1t28nDU

 

No comments: