Thursday, September 9, 2021

HOW MUCH MONEY HAVE SOCIOPATH LAWYERS KAMALA HARRIS AND JOE BIDEN SUCKED OFF PLANNED PARENTHOOD.... WHICH CAME FROM THE TAX PAYERS IN THE FIRST PLACE???

THE ONLY GOD THIS POS BIDEN BELIEVES IN IS CALLED WALL STREET!


Michelle Malkin: The Coming Abortion Insurrection

 By Michelle Malkin | September 9, 2021 | 3:53pm EDT

 
 

Pro-abortion activists host a rally. (Photo credit: TAMI CHAPPELL/AFP via Getty Images)
Pro-abortion activists host a rally. (Photo credit: TAMI CHAPPELL/AFP via Getty Images)

I told you it was coming. Back in May, on my show, "Sovereign Nation," I chronicled significant signs of pro-life progress that were driving death-lobby Democrats mad — and I warned of a wave of intolerant tantrums to come as we hurtle into autumn. It's here.

In a 5-4 ruling last week, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to strike down the Texas heartbeat law protecting unborn babies as early as six weeks of age. This follows nationwide adoption of heartbeat laws and other abortion restrictions in so many state legislatures that the left-wing Guttmacher Institute apocalyptically reported that "2021 is on track to become the most devastating anti-abortion state legislative session in decades."

Extremist pro-abortion ghouls immediately lamented in early September that more innocent human lives with detectable heartbeats in the womb will be saved thanks to the decision. Richard Hanania, a former Columbia University research fellow, complained that "if red states ban abortion, we could see a world where they have five times as many children with Down syndrome, and similar numbers for other disabilities."

Saved lives: horrors!

That callous response was tame compared with the unhinged rantings of actress Bette Midler, who called on all women to "refuse to have sex with men" in protest of state abortion restrictions. (I'd venture a guess that plenty of men would not consider abstaining from sex with Bette Midler a punishment, but I digress.)

The mayor of godforsaken hellhole Portland, Ore., Ted Wheeler, indignantly proposed a resolution banning city trade and travel with Texas until the state withdraws the law or it gets overturned in court. (I'd venture a guess that very few Texans will consider Portland's abstinence and withdrawal from the Lone Star State a punishment, but again, I digress.)

A literal Satanic Temple announced plans to defy the law and assist any woman who "wishes to undergo the Satanic Abortion Ritual within the first 24 weeks of pregnancy." Meanwhile, web-hosting company GoDaddy showed its Satan-sympathizing colors by yanking down a whistleblower website run by Texas Right to Life that aimed to support enforcement of the heartbeat law.

Pro-abortion bigotry is similarly out in full force in the tech and entertainment industries. Standing up against the homicidal cancellation of unborn life will get you canceled by Hollywood and Silicon Valley.

The Food Network denounced former show host Josh Denny over his support for the Texas law, declaring that "his views do not reflect our company values and we regret giving him a platform."

Denny, God bless him, did not back down.

"If you regret having ever given me a platform," the actor and comedian retorted, "how about you send me a check for the (tens) of millions of dollars my show made for your network(s)?...You knew my views and my style of comedy when you hired me. My views represent the beliefs of half of this country."

Indeed. Those views are also shared by John Gibson, who proclaimed publicly on Twitter that he was "proud" of the U.S. Supreme Court for affirming the Texas law protecting the unborn. "I felt it was important to go on the record as a pro-life game developer." Gibson was the co-owner of Tripwire Interactive, a Georgia-based video game developer and publisher, and until Sept. 6, he was the CEO.

Throwing their own leader under the bus, Tripwire's top brass wrote that they "are deeply sorry and are unified in our commitment to take swift action and to foster a more positive environment."

"Sorry" for allowing diversity of opinion to rear its terrible head!

This is all but a prelude to the real abortion insurrection. On Oct. 2, two days before the new Supreme Court term kicks off, militant feminist leaders are planning the mother of all pro-abortion Women's Marches in Washington, D.C. These are the types of women who have turned up at past protests dressed as vaginas and vulvas, howling at the tops of their lungs while vandalizing public facilities with sanitary napkins and storming the U.S. Capitol and Supreme Court steps.

Very rich, isn't it, coming from the same people who've been weaponizing Nov. 3 and Jan. 6 to cast their political opponents as the most dangerous public safety and homeland security villains. May I remind you that each and every one of the heartbeat laws and pro-life protections adopted in 2021 came about peacefully and lawfully. Pro-lifers didn't have to shut down highways, burn down businesses, or incite violence like Women's March allies in Antifa and Black Lives Matter. They worked through the system — and it's still unacceptable to the mob.

Watch who abides by the rules of civility — and who breaks the rules when they don't get what they want. History already shows us that some Capitol takeovers are more protected and equal than the others. I guarantee you that all the incessantly repeated narratives about "white supremacists" (like brown-skinned me) and Trump supporters being the real threats to democracy will be thoroughly debunked when the aggrieved abortion vigilantes in pink hats and raised fists return to Washington. Mark my words.

Michelle Malkin is a conservative blogger at michellemalkin.com, syndicated columnist, author, and founder of hotair.com. Michelle Malkin's email address is MichelleMalkinInvestigates@protonmail.com.


Biden DOJ Sues Texas over Abortion Law

WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 23: U.S. President Joe Biden, joined Attorney General Merrick Garland, speaks on gun crime prevention measures at the White House on June 23, 2021 in Washington, DC. Biden outlined new measures to curb gun violence including stopping the flow illegal guns and targeting rogue gun dealers. …
Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images
2:09

President Joe Biden’s Department of Justice filed a lawsuit on Thursday against Texas over the Lone Star State’s abortion “heartbeat” law, alleging it is “in open defiance of the Constitution.”

Attorney General Merrick Garland unveiled the civil lawsuit against Texas at an afternoon press conference.

“This kind of scheme to nullify the Constitution of the United States is one that all Americans, whatever their politics or party, should fear,” Garland stated. “If it prevails, it may become a model for action in other areas, by other states and with respect to other constitutional rights and judicial precedents.”

“Nor need one think long or hard to realize the damage that would be done to our society if states were allowed to implement laws that empower any private individual to infringe on another’s constitutionally protected rights in this way,” the attorney general continued.

“The act is clearly unconstitutional,” he added.

The lawsuit following the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision not to block Texas’ law prohibiting abortion after six weeks.

Last Saturday, a judge has temporarily barred some Texas abortion facilities from facing legal action by the state’s largest anti-abortion organization.

The temporary restraining order was issued Friday by District Judge Maya Guerra Gamble in Austin in response to a Planned Parenthood request. Although the law remains in effect, the judge’s order shields Planned Parenthood’s clinics, specifically, from whistleblower lawsuits by the nonprofit group Texas Right to Life, its legislative director, and people working in concert with the group.

A hearing on a preliminary injunction request is scheduled for September 13. The temporary restraining order only shields Planned Parenthood clinics from Texas Right to Life lawsuits and doesn’t prevent Texas Right to Life from suing non-Planned Parenthood abortion clinics in the state. It also doesn’t prevent people who aren’t affiliated with Texas Right to Life from suing Planned Parenthood.

The Associated Press contributed to this report. 


D.C. Cardinal: Joe Biden Departs from ‘Catholic Teaching’ on Abortion

Democratic presidential candidate, former Vice President Joe Biden listens as clergy members and community activists speak during a visit to Bethel AME Church in Wilmington, Del., Monday, June 1, 2020. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)
AP Photo/Andrew Harnik
3:30

Washington, DC, Cardinal Wilton Gregory told the National Press Club Wednesday that President Biden “is not demonstrating Catholic teaching” by denying that human life begins at conception.

“The Catholic Church teaches and has taught that life human life begins at conception,” Cardinal Gregory told reporters. “So the president is not demonstrating Catholic teaching.”

“Our Church has not changed its position on the morality of abortion, “the cardinal stated. “And I don’t see how we could, because we believe that every human life is sacred.”

Last Friday, Biden publicly repudiated his former position that life begins at conception, insisting he no longer holds this view.

“I respect those who believe life begins at the moment of conception and all … I respect that,” Mr. Biden told reporters after a speech at the White House. “Don’t agree. But I respect that.”

During a 2012 debate with then Representative Paul Ryan, Biden affirmed the conviction that “life begins at conception,” an assertion he reiterated in 2015.

“I’m prepared to accept that at the moment of conception there’s human life and being, but I’m not prepared to say that to other God-fearing, non-God-fearing people that have a different view,” he said in an interview.

The Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches that from “the first moment of his existence, a human being must be recognized as having the rights of a person – among which is the inviolable right of every innocent being to life.”

The Church, to which Biden belongs, deems abortion to be murder and attaches its highest penalty — that of automatic excommunication — to anyone who “procures a completed abortion.”

Democratic presidential candidate and former US Vice President Joe Biden visits Grace Lutheran Church in Kenosha, Wisconsin, on September 3, 2020, in the aftermath of the police shooting of Jacob Blake. (Photo by JIM WATSON / AFP) (Photo by JIM WATSON/AFP via Getty Images)

Democratic presidential candidate and former US Vice President Joe Biden visits Grace Lutheran Church in Kenosha, Wisconsin, on September 3, 2020, in the aftermath of the police shooting of Jacob Blake. (JIM WATSON/AFP via Getty Images)

Shortly after Biden reversed his stance on when life begins, Bishop Donald Hying of Madison noted wryly that no one can continue mouthing the fiction that Biden is “personally opposed” to abortion.

“People always claimed that President Biden was personally opposed to abortion,” Bishop Hying wrote on Twitter. “Today, he said, ‘I respect those who believe life begins at the moment of conception and all, I respect that-don’t agree, but I respect that.’”

“Today, we’ve all learned the painful and disturbing truth,” the bishop concluded.

For his part, Bill Donohue, president of the Catholic League for Civil and Religious Rights, published an essay titled: “So When Does Life Begin, Mr. President?”

“If life does not begin at conception, Mr. Biden, then when does it begin?” Donohue asked. “Does life begin when the baby’s spinal cord, nervous system, gastrointestinal system, heart and lungs develop? That would be during the first four weeks from conception.”

“Does it begin when the heart begins to beat? That would be four weeks after conception,” he proceeded.

“Does it begin when the baby’s nose forms and his or her fingers begin to develop? That would be six weeks after conception,” he noted.

“Does it begin when the baby’s genitals develop? That would be nine weeks after conception,” he continued.

“Does it begin when the baby kicks, can hear, has a strong grip and a strong heartbeat? That would be during the second trimester,” he went on.

“The science did not change, Mr. Biden, and neither has the Catholic Church’s teaching on this subject. So why did you?” Donohue asked.



The Satanic Temple’s bronze Baphomet. Photograph: The Satanic Temple/AP

Pelosi’s Archbishop: ‘You Cannot Be a Good Catholic and Support Expanding a…Right to Kill Innocent Human Beings’

 By CNSNews.com Staff | September 6, 2021 | 9:45am EDT

 
 
(Getty Images)
(Getty Images)

Catholic Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone of San Francisco, the diocese where House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D.-Calif.) resides, published a commentary in the Washington Post on Sunday stating that you cannot be a good Catholic and support the killing of unborn children through abortion.

“You cannot be a good Catholic and support expanding a government-approved right to kill innocent human beings,” said Cordileone. “The answer to crisis pregnancies is not violence but love, for both mother and child.”

Cordileone specifically addressed the response of both Pelosi and President Biden—both of who profess to be Catholics—to Supreme Court’s refusal to issue an injunction against a Texas law that bans the abortion of babies who have a detectable heartbeat.

“Prominent politicians lost no time in reacting hyperbolically to the Supreme Court’s decision refusing to enjoin Texas’s new law banning abortions after the detection of a fetal heartbeat,” said Cordileone. “President Biden announced a “whole-of-government effort” to find ways to overcome the Texas measure. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) denounced the Supreme Court’s refusal as a ‘cowardly, dark-of-night decision to uphold a flagrantly unconstitutional assault on women’s rights and health,’ and promised new legal action: ‘This ban necessitates codifying Roe v. Wade’ in federal law.

“As a faith leader in the Catholic community, I find it especially disturbing that so many of the politicians on the wrong side of the preeminent human rights issue of our time are self-professed Catholics,” said Cordileone.

You can read his full commentary for the Washington Post—which is headlined “Our duty to challenge Catholic politicians who support abortion rights”--by clicking here.

The Satanic Temple Rallies Against Texas Abortion Law

The Satanic Temple’s bronze Baphomet. Photograph: The Satanic Temple/AP
The Satanic Temple/AP
2:54

Pro-choicers can now count The Satanic Temple among their list of allies in the fight against the recent anti-abortion law in Texas.

Two years after challenging a pro-life law in Missouri, the satanic group that claims to be little more than a collection of theatrical atheists have now “filed a letter with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration arguing that its Texas members should have legal access to abortion pills,” according to the San Antonio Current.

In the letter addressed to the FDA, Lucien Greaves, the Temple’s spokesman and cofounder, argued that the abortion drugs Misoprostol and Mifepristone should be allowed under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) so as to be used in what the Temple referred to as their “Abortion Rituals.”

I am sure Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton — who famously spends a good deal of his time composing press releases about Religious Liberty issues in other states — will be proud to see that Texas’s robust Religious Liberty laws, which he so vociferously champions, will prevent future Abortion Rituals from being interrupted by superfluous government restrictions meant only to shame and harass those seeking an abortion.

The battle for abortion rights is largely a battle of competing religious viewpoints, and our viewpoint that the nonviable fetus is part of the impregnated host is fortunately protected under Religous Liberty laws.

The Satanic Temple previously cited the Religious Freedom Restoration Act to overturn a set of pro-life laws in Missouri, but the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear it.

The cast members of the Hell House Mercy Maelica, Cameron Willson (L) and Joy Davenport (C) pose for a photo at the Satanic Temple where a "Hell House" is being held in Salem, Massachusett on October 8, 2019. - The Hell House was a parody on a Christian Conversion centre meant to scare atheist and other Satanic Church members. (Photo by Joseph Prezioso / AFP) (Photo by JOSEPH PREZIOSO/AFP via Getty Images)

The cast members of the Hell House Mercy Maelica, Cameron Willson (L) and Joy Davenport (C) pose for a photo at the Satanic Temple where a “Hell House” is being held in Salem, Massachusetts on October 8, 2019. – The Hell House was a parody on a Christian Conversion centre meant to scare atheist and other Satanic Church members. (Photo by Joseph Prezioso / AFP) (Photo by JOSEPH PREZIOSO/AFP via Getty Images)

The Satanic Temple bills itself as a non-theistic organization dedicated to reason and uses Satanic imagery as little more than a tool to troll Christians. Its website states:

The mission of The Satanic Temple is to encourage benevolence and empathy among all people, reject tyrannical authority, advocate practical common sense, oppose injustice, and undertake noble pursuits. The Satanic Temple has publicly confronted hate groups, fought for the abolition of corporal punishment in public schools, applied for equal representation when religious installations are placed on public property, provided religious exemption and legal protection against laws that unscientifically restrict women’s reproductive autonomy, exposed harmful pseudo-scientific practitioners in mental health care, organized clubs alongside other religious after-school clubs in schools besieged by proselytizing organizations, and engaged in other advocacy in accordance with our tenets.

Last Wednesday, the Supreme Court decided 5-4 not to block the Lone Star State’s new law banning most abortions after six weeks of pregnancy, while allowing citizens to sue abortion providers and anyone who aids in abortion for up to $10,000 in damages.

Report: Texas Abortionists Ended 67 Pregnancies in 17 Hours to Beat Heartbeat Ban Deadline

Hundreds of little plastic foetuses are displayed on a square in Houten, August 12, 2013. The Dutch Christian organisation Schreeuw om Leven (Scream for Life) has set up the action to protest against the establishment of a Centre for Birth Control, Abortion and Sexuality Rotterdam (CASA) in Houten. AFP PHOTO …
ROBIN VAN LONKHUIJSEN/AFP via Getty Images
3:38

An abortion clinic in Fort Worth, Texas, “raced” to terminate as many pregnancies as possible before midnight Tuesday, when the state’s heartbeat abortion ban took effect, The 19th reported in a dramatic piece last week.

According to the gender and politics independent outlet founded by two former editors of the Texas Tribune, abortionist Marva Sadler of Whole Woman’s Health, one of the largest abortion clinics in Texas, said four hours before the deadline, two dozen women were still packing the waiting room hoping to end their pregnancies before the law took effect.

The abortionists terminated 67 pregnancies in 17 hours, racing to beat the heartbeat ban, said the report.

“We are not the bad guys here,” Sadler told her staff. “We are doing everything right and we’re going to help everybody that we can. If there’s someone that we can’t help, it’s not our fault.”

According to the report:

The staff worked without stopping to eat, shifting patients in and out of rooms. In the lobby, people who had been waiting five hours or more asked when they would be called. They had to pick up other kids. Their ride was leaving. Their family members, who were outside because of coronavirus regulations, knocked on the front door to see what was happening. Would they be seen or turned away?

When Sadler returned to her abortion clinic the next day, the law was in effect, and she knew she would have to turn women away.

“How unfair,” she kept thinking, “that those women yesterday were helped, and the women today don’t have any help.”

The U.S. Supreme Court decided, 5-4, not to block the heartbeat ban, which prohibits abortions once a fetal heartbeat is detected, at generally six weeks’ gestation.

The new law also contains a unique enforcement mechanism whereby any private citizen may file a civil lawsuit against an abortion provider or any other individual who “aids or abets” a “criminal abortion.”

However, Judge Maya Guerra Gamble of the District Court in Travis County, Texas, granted Planned Parenthood’s application for a temporary restraining order (TRO) against Texas Right to Life, which spearheaded the new law, in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision.

As Breitbart News reported:

The TRO blocks not only Texas Right to Life but up to 100 private individuals. The judge announced her intention to block the law entirely, but the order itself covers only those 100 individuals. For lawsuits being brought under the new law, the question will be if any of them are “persons in active concert and participation with” Texas Right to Life. If so, up to 100 of them would be blocked. But private citizens who are not actively working with the pro-life organization are still free to bring private lawsuits.

Gamble said the Texas law “creates a probable, irreparable, and imminent injury in the interim for which Plaintiffs and their physicians, staff, and patients throughout Texas have no adequate remedy at law if Plaintiffs, their physicians, and staff are subjected to private enforcement lawsuits against them under S.B. 8.”

The TRO is in effect until September 17. A hearing for a preliminary injunction has been set for September 13.

The case is Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Surgical Health Services v. Texas Right to Life No. D-1-GN-21-004632, in District Court of Travis County, Texas.


The Satanic Temple’s bronze Baphomet. Photograph: The Satanic Temple/AP


Pelosi: It’s ‘Cowardly’ for Supreme Court Not to Uphold the Right to Kill an Unborn Baby With a Heartbeat

By CNSNews.com Staff | September 3, 2021 | 4:05pm EDT

 
 
(Photo by Tom Williams/Roll Call/Getty Images)
(Photo by Tom Williams/Roll Call/Getty Images)

(CNSNews.com) - House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D.-Calif.) on Thursday put out a statement calling the Supreme Court “cowardly” for not issuing an injunction to stop enforcement of a Texas law, which went into effect on Wednesday, that prohibits aborting babies who have a detectable heartbeat.

“The Supreme Court’s cowardly, dark-of-night decision to uphold a flagrantly unconstitutional assault on women’s rights and health is staggering,” said Pelosi. “That this radically partisan Court chose to do so without a full briefing, oral arguments or providing a full, signed opinion is shameful.

Here is the full text of Pelosi’s statement:

“Pelosi Statement on Supreme Court Shadow Ruling on Texas Reproductive Rights Case

“September 2, 2021

Washington, D.C. – Speaker Nancy Pelosi issued this statement after the Supreme Court ruled in the middle of the night to leave SB8, the most restrictive abortion ban in fifty years, in place:

“‘The Supreme Court’s cowardly, dark-of-night decision to uphold a flagrantly unconstitutional assault on women’s rights and health is staggering.  That this radically partisan Court chose to do so without a full briefing, oral arguments or providing a full, signed opinion is shameful.

“‘SB8 delivers catastrophe to women in Texas, particularly women of color and women from low-income communities.  Every woman, everywhere has the constitutional right to basic health care.  SB8 is the most extreme, dangerous abortion ban in half a century, and its purpose is to destroy Roe v. Wade, and even refuses to make exceptions for cases of rape and incest.  This ban necessitates codifying Roe v. Wade.

“‘Upon our return, the House will bring up Congresswoman Judy Chu’s Women’s Health Protection Act to enshrine into law reproductive health care for all women across America. 

“‘SB8 unleashes one of the most disturbing, unprecedented and far-reaching assaults on health care providers – and on anyone who helps a woman, in any way, access an abortion – by creating a vigilante bounty system that will have a chilling effect on the provision of any reproductive health care services.  This provision is a cynical, backdoor attempt by partisan lawmakers to evade the Constitution and the law to destroy not only a woman’s right to health care but potentially any right or protection that partisan lawmakers target.

“‘When the Supreme Court takes up its reproductive rights case this year, we urge it to uphold, as Justice Sotomayor wrote in her dissent, ‘its constitutional obligations to protect not only the rights of women, but also the sanctity of its precedents and of the rule of law.’”


Tucker: In the Age of 'Not Your Body, Not Your Choice' Vaccines, What's Dems' Argument Against Texas Abortion Law?

 By Megan Williams | September 3, 2021 | 5:21pm EDT

 
 
Tucker Carlson hosts his primetime Fox News show "Tucker Carlson Tonight." (Photo credit: Fox News)
Tucker Carlson hosts his primetime Fox News show "Tucker Carlson Tonight." (Photo credit: Fox News)

Democrats who have argued "my body, my choice" when it comes to abortion do not have much ground to stand on with Texas' abortion law after pushing vaccine mandates that violate bodily autonomy during the past few months, Fox News host Tucker Carlson argued Thursday.

Carlson and radio host Dana Loesch discussed how the left’s actions and demands during the pandemic have contradicted their previous arguments in support of abortion.

“Everyone who has been screaming, “My body, my choice” all of these years, who has been speaking out for, in favor of government-mandated vaccines, can all have a million seats right now because this has all been a giant grift,” Loesch said. 

"Maybe the only justification for abortion now is abortion itself; maybe they just like abortion, maybe it’s that simple," Carlson stated.

Below is a transcript of the “Tucker Carlson Show”:

Tucker Carlson: That's what they're telling you. These people can't even hear themselves. But millions of normal Americans do recognize this moment for what it is: it’s proof that democracy does still exist, voters can decide what they want for their communities, their states, their towns, and that courts will at least potentially respect that right. It's called self-government.

The legislature in Texas has realized this for months now; they’ve passed laws banning vaccine passports, homeless encampments, racist struggle sessions in schools, laws that block protests that prevent emergency vehicles from riding down the road, etcetera, etcetera; laws specific to Texas that the people of Texas want and a lot of those laws are still on the books. So that’s not a bad thing; how is that a bad thing? Why should Texas have to be exactly like California? 

The problem is, if that kind of thinking goes national, it gravely disempowers the people at CNN and the so-called civil rights organizations that think they’re in control of everything. On the other hand, it might actually save civil rights for the rest of us and that might be a good thing. 

Dana Loesch is a nationally syndicated radio host who we think lives in Texas; she joins us tonight. Thanks so much for coming on.

Dana Loesch: Thanks, Tucker.

Carlson: The response to this, you’ve got to kind of wonder, now that we’ve decided that it’s not your body and you don’t get to choose what to do with it, politicians get to make that choice, what is the argument against this Texas law? It’s a sincere question. 

Loesch: That’s a great question. All I’ve heard is that I’m the American Taliban. And what I want to know is if I’m the American Taliban -- we know that’s not true because I don’t have a Blackhawk, Tucker and I think that I need to have that first in order to have that classification. 

Carlson: I totally agree.

Loesch: It doesn't count. Six weeks, up to the heartbeat, and I love how all of the people who for so long have said that "abortion is a sacred healthcare treatment,” because healthcare treatment, I don’t know what that phrase to describe abortion means either. “But it’s a sacred healthcare treatment between a woman and her doctor.”

However, Tucker, as you know, vaccines should be mandated to everybody by the government and the government's going to stand between you and your doctor. Everyone who has been screaming, “My body, my choice” all of these years, who has been speaking out for, in favor of government-mandated vaccines, can all have a million seats right now because this has all been a giant grift. 

These people don’t care, it’s a great day for babies in Texas; I’ll just put it like that. This is a great day for babies in Texas and I don’t understand what all of these birthing persons were complaining about in Austin because remember like gender's a social construct, right? So, they opened the door wide to this, Tucker, as you said: birthing persons. 

Carlson: They can’t think clearly because they gave up all of their arguments: it’s a woman’s choice, your body is autonomous, politicians don’t have a right to make healthcare decisions. 

Across the country, politicians are punishing doctors, physicians, licensed physicians for not taking medicine that licensed physicians don’t want to take. I mean, that’s happening everywhere. 

So maybe the only justification for abortion now is abortion itself; maybe they just like abortion, maybe it’s that simple. 

Loesch: Well, at least that's what they’re trying to argue it. I mean, it’s evil, it ends a life, I don’t know anything that ends a life that is called healthcare; that’s death, that’s murder, that’s killing.

Megan Williams is a CNSNews intern and junior at Hillsdale College. She is majoring in Rhetoric and Public Address with a Journalism minor. She is the assistant opinions editor for the Hillsdale Collegian and enjoys covering local events, from concerts to conventions. Born and raised in Southern California, Megan is excited to experience D.C. and grow as a journalist with CNSNews. 

No comments: