Thursday, October 7, 2021

DEMS AND TRUMP - Dems Use "Threat of Trump" To Justify Any Power Grab

THE REASON WE ENDED UP WITH THE ORANGE BABOON WAS BECAUSE PEOPLE KNEW THAT LYING BRIBES SUCKING LAWYER HILLARY CLINTON WAS MUCH, MUCH, MUCH WORSE!

THE REASON WE ENDED UP WITH JOE 'BRIBES' BIDEN WAS BECAUSE PEOPLE WERE VOTING AGAINST THE ORANGE BABOON.

AND THE NATION CONTINUES TO DRAIN RIGHT DOWN THE SEWER!



Dems Use "Threat of Trump" To Justify Any Power Grab

 

 3 comments

Remember when Democrats and their media ranted about President George W. Bush's, "Either you are with us or you are with the terrorists." The full context of that was, "Every nation in every region now has a decision to make: Either you are with us or you are with the terrorists."

(And had he stuck with it after a year or two, we wouldn't still be dealing with this twenty years later.)

But the Democrats insisted on depicting it as a Hitlerian threat and a binary proposition that demanding pledging unconditional loyalty to the regime. (Since then the Dems have forgotten how they used to depict Bush as Hitler and reinvented him as a kind gentle artist.)

Now Jonathan Chait, who kept his perch at the failing New York Magazine even while truly talented writers who challenged wokeness were forced out, has unveiled his own Flight 93 Election essay, titled, "Anybody Fighting Joe Biden Is Helping Trump's Next Coup - All Republican politics is now functionally authoritarian." The only thing this establishes is that Democrat politics is functionally authoritarian and Chait, like Biden's people, is aiming the authoritarianism at moderate Democrats who refuse to go along with the Left.

The coup is coming from inside the White House.

The only meaningful thing about Chait's latest entry into competing with Jennifer Rubin for administration clickbait is the way that the media manufactures the "Threat of Trump" in order to justify wild power grabs by their leftist political allies.

If you oppose monitoring everyone's bank accounts for $600 and $250,000 electric car chargers for Tesla owners, you're "helping Trump's next coup". You're either with us or with Trump. The binary demands total and immediate submission to the Left's agenda. Anyone who dissents is, well as the Bolsheviks used to put it, a fascist. It's the Bolsheviks calling socialists traitors if they didn't sign on to their authoritarian program. The binary eliminates any options other than following party discipline or supporting the return of the Czar.

There can only be one party. And within that party, there can only be one correct viewpoint. Either you're with us or with Trump.

US Vice President Kamala Harris 'is such a hoax'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hRg6KxiOr3Q

 

 

How Kamala Harris Made Her Millions

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIipQxGdjYs

 

The Shady Side Of Kamala Harris

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=flz5k8RPQGk

 

The United States is 'literally leaderless'

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJf-XRgzcjs

 

Newt Gingrich calls Joe Biden a 'sickness'

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eVlPJcgRCj8

 

Kamala’s Hillary Moment

Cheap pandering at Israel’s expense on George Mason visit.

 

 6 comments

I followed reports of Vice President Kamala Harris’s recent exchange with a student at George Mason University with great interest, and dismay. In many ways, it reminded me of an incident with Hilary Clinton, not in a good way.  

Kamala addressed students at George Mason to mark National Voter Registration Day. Following her remarks, she opened the floor for questions.

One student commented to Kamala, “You brought up how the power of the people and demonstrations and organizing is very valuable in America. But I see that over the summer, there have been, like, protests and demonstrations in astronomical numbers standing with Palestine, but then just a few days ago there were funds allocated to continue backing Israel, which hurts my heart because it’s an ethnic genocide and a displacement of people — the same that happened in America — and I’m sure you’re aware of this. I bring this up also because…all this money ends up going to inflaming Israel and backing Saudi Arabia and whatnot. And …I just feel like I need to bring this up because it affects my life and people I really care about’s lives.”

Kamala listened, nodding, and replied, “I’m glad you did. And again, this is about the fact that your voice, your perspective, your experience, your truth, should not be suppressed. And it must be heard, right? A democracy is at its strongest when everyone participates. It is its weakest when anyone is left out. And that’s not only about being physically present, but that your voice is present … Our goal should be unity, but not uniformity.”

This is reminiscent of Hillary Clinton’s 1999 visit (as first lady) with Suha Arafat, wife of then Palestinian Authority president and long-time terrorist leader, Yasser Arafat.  

As she introduced Hillary at the Ramallah gathering, Arafat commented in Arabic, “It is important to point out the severe damage caused by the intensive daily use of poison gas by Israeli forces in the past years that led to an increase in cancer cases among Palestinian women and children.”

Hillary sat quietly while listening to the translation, reportedly with no change of expression, or visible or verbal response to Arafat’s nonsensical and antisemitic claim. After the event, Hillary kissed Arafat as she explained, which is like a handshake. Hillary was excoriated. The following day, in Jordan, she rebuked Arafat for the comments.

“Everyone who supports this (peace) effort should refrain from inflammatory rhetoric and from baseless accusations... We do not believe that any kind of public inflammatory statements or excessive rhetoric is helpful to the peace process."

Hilary got credit for the rebuke, albeit late and not addressing it in person when Arafat’s initial baseless antisemitic comment was made.  But the lack of doing so and not calling out the specific antisemitic nature of the comment, rather the unhelpfulness of “public inflammatory statements,” has stuck with her ever since.

Kamala should know better. She’s not only not new to international politics and diplomacy, she’s regarded as a friend of Israel. She knows that there is no ethnic genocide taking place by Israel against Palestinian or Israeli Arabs. She also knows that the Iron Dome is a strictly defensive weapon that protects Israelis and Arabs. Whether it was rhetoric or cheap pandering to the VP, the George Mason student noted, “I am sure you must be aware of this” as if getting Kamala’s affirmation. By her silence, she’s chosen to let the student’s comment stand.

Just like Hillary before her, Kamila deserves public excoriation.  She blew it, and still has not commented on the exchange, which emboldens those who espouse inaccurate antisemitic lies. Yes, of course, all voices should be heard. However, when someone states something so egregious, blatantly false, much less antisemitic, and doing so in an academic environment, the proper response would have been to tell the uninformed student what’s wrong with her statement.  

I wish Kamala said something like this:

Actually while I appreciate your comments, as Senator and Vice President, and someone who’s been involved in Middle Eastern politics, I have to tell you that you’re wrong. Especially here, at a university, where we need to learn facts to understand the world around us. Let me tell you why. First of all, the Iron Dome funding to which you referred is for a defensive weapon I wish Israel didn’t have to have. But I am glad that it does, and that we are funding it. It is saving lives. Hamas and other terrorists have violated every relevant law and morality by firing thousands of rockets at Israeli communities, and doing so while hiding behind civilians in Gaza.  This needs to stop, but as long as they keep doing it, I’ll be the first to stand up to support Israel in its obligation to defend itself, and support the Iron Dome in doing so.

Then she should have continued,

As for your comment about ethnic genocide, let’s be clear that there is not and has never been an ethnic genocide against Palestinian Arabs. You need to study your history a little more closely.  What’s happening in the Middle East does not come close to the genocides that have actually taken place in Armenia, the Holocaust, Rwanda, etc. Or against Christian Arabs living under ISIS and elsewhere.  There’s just no parallel.  But if you look at the facts, an ethnic genocide means mass murder of a particular racial, ethnic, or religious group. When you speak in these terms you cheapen the suffering of those who have actually suffered genocide.  Also, you need to note, that since 1948, both the number of Israeli Arabs and Palestinian Arabs has continued to grow. I hope you see the illogical points of your statement and how the facts prove you wrong.

The sound of silence works well in 1960s folk rock, but not in contemporary diplomacy. Unfortunately, Kamala will go down in history as the person who let another baseless antisemitic comment pass, and didn’t even have the decency to issue a correction or clarification the following day, or since.  

Special Report: The Hillary Clinton Problem

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WywjHtIzNVU


THE DEMOCRAT PARTY’S BILLIONAIRES’ GLOBALIST EMPIRE requires someone as ruthlessly dishonest as Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama to be puppet dictators.

http://hillaryclinton-whitecollarcriminal.blogspot.com/2018/09/google-rigged-it-so-illegals-would-vote.html

Globalism: Google VP Kent Walker insists that despite its repeated rejection by electorates around the world, “globalization” is an “incredible force for good.”

 Hillary Clinton’s Democratic party: An executive nearly broke down crying because of the candidate’s loss. Not a single executive expressed anything but dismay at her defeat.  

Immigration: Maintaining liberal immigration in the U.S is the policy that Google’s executives discussed the most. 

Clinton Foundation Put On Watch List Of Suspicious ‘Charities’

 

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2015/04/charity-navigator-clinton-foundation.html

 

"But what the Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of the American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power, use it to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and venal. Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear to every person on the planet by now."  ----  Patricia McCarthy

 

 

///

 

 

GRIFTER AND PHONY CHARITY FOUNDATION FRAUDSTER HILLARY CLINTON’S LONG SERVICE TO AMERICA’S MOST EVIL BANKSTERS

 

https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2019/08/the-democrat-party-grifter-and-pay-to.html

 

The judge found these releases, together with the publication of Clinton’s secret speeches to Wall Street banks, in which she pledged to be their representative, were “matters of the highest public concern.” They “allowed the American electorate to look behind the curtain of one of the two major political parties in the United States during a presidential election.”

*

 

“Clinton also failed to mention how he and Hillary cashed in after his presidential tenure to make themselves multimillionaires, in part by taking tens of millions in speaking fees from Wall Street bankers.”

 

///

 

VIDEO:

THE FRAUDULENT CLINTON FOUNDATION EXPOSED.

PAY-TO-PLAY FROM THE FIRST DAY!

 

https://hillaryclinton-whitecollarcriminal.blogspot.com/2019/01/sucking-in-bribes-dirty-story-of-two-of.html

 

Is it a signal that she's back in the game because she's selling her president-ability to the world's global billionaire crowd and laying the groundwork for more funds?  There are all kinds of ways for foreign billionaires to get money to the U.S. without consequences, after all.  What's more, it's pretty much the biggest base of support she has, which is at least one reason why she lost the 2016 election.

*

“The couple parlayed lives supposedly spent in “public service”
into admission into the upper stratosphere of American wealth, with incomes in the top 0.1 percent bracket. The source of this vast wealth was a political
machine that might well be dubbed “Clinton, Inc.” This consists essentially of
a seedy money-laundering operation to ensure big business support for the
Clintons’ political ambitions as well as their personal fortunes.

*

The basic components of the operation are lavishly paid speeches to Wall Street and Fortune 500 audiences, corporate campaign contributions, and donations to the ostensibly philanthropic Clinton Foundation.”

*

"But what the Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of the American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power, use it to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and venal. Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear to every person on the planet by now."  ----  Patricia McCarthy - AMERICANTHINKER.com

No comments: