Wednesday, October 6, 2021

JOE BIDEN'S SURRENDER OF AMERICA'S BORDERS TO NARCOMEX APPEARS TO BE UNPOPULAR TO LEGALS

 

Sen Cruz and GOP senators hold a press conference on immigration & border issues





Poll: Only 11 Percent ‘Strongly Approve’ of Joe Biden’s Handling of Immigration

U.S. President Joe Biden hosts a hybrid meeting with corporate chief executives and members of his cabinet to discuss the looming federal debt limit in the South Court Auditorium in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building on October 06, 2021 in Washington, DC. Each of the meeting participants, including Treasury Secretary …
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
3:44

Only 11 percent of Americans strongly support President Joe Biden’s easy-migration, pro-amnesty immigration policies, according to a Morning Consult poll.

The poll also shows 44 percent strong opposition to Biden’s policies, even as his deputies push hard to expand the inflow of visa workers and chain-migration migrants in the pending $3.5 trillion reconciliation bill.

The “strong” responses are more important than the “somewhat” reactions because they are far more likely to influence voting in 2022.

Overall, the October 2-4 poll of 1,998 registered voters showed 33 percent support and 59 percent opposition to Biden’s policy of forcing Americans to compete with legal and illegal migrants for jobs and housing.

The poll results are sharply different from the industry-funded, pro-amnesty, rose-tinted push polls used to promote the pending amnesties in the U.S. Senate. For example, a September 1 survey by the American Business Immigration Coalition (ABIC) claims that roughly 75 percent of voters support the amnesty proposals in the Democrats’ budget-reconciliation spending bill.

However, the GOP may choose to miss the political opportunity to win over swing voters with the promise of pro-family, pocketbook immigration reform.

For many years, donor-funded GOP leaders, including House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA)and Rep. John Katko (R-NY) — and their staff — have downplayed the pocketbook impact of migration on Americans’ communities. One reason for this policy is to avoid making any campaign promises on immigration that would be opposed by the donors.

Instead, the GOP tries to encourage the turnout of its base voters by spotlighting the non-economic aspects of the migration problem, including crime by migrants, border chaos, and drug smuggling.

Some Republicans, including Rep. Jim Banks (R-IN), are learning to make a pocketbook pitch that will raise support among the critical swing voters.

“Democrats in Congress would rather ignore [President] Joe Biden’s humanitarian disaster than give up their dream of open borders,” said a September 25 weekend Republican Address by Rep. Yvette Herrell (R-NM). She continued:

But Americans won’t be distracted, not by the media, or the radical left. We stand for our workers. We stand for law enforcement. We stand for safe communities. We stand for borders. We stand for America.

McCarthy tweeted the Herrell message on the 25th — and then retweeted a September 28 tweet from Rep. Jason Smith (R-MO) that spotlighted the amnesty’s danger to Americans’ ability to earn a living:

Migration is deeply unpopular because it damages ordinary Americans’ career opportunities, cuts their wages, raises their rents, curbs their productivity, shrinks their political clout, widens regional wealth gaps, and wrecks their democratic, equality-promoting civic culture.

For many years, a wide variety of pollsters have shown deep and broad opposition to labor migration and the inflow of temporary contract workers into jobs sought by young U.S. graduates.

This pocketbook opposition is multiracialcross-sexnon-racistclass-basedbipartisan,  rationalpersistent, and recognizes the solidarity Americans owe to each other.

Analysis: Democrat Budget Gives $80B in Child Tax Credits to Illegal Aliens

Haitian migrants continue to cross across the US-Mexico border on the Rio Grande as seen from Ciudad Acuna, Coahuila state, Mexico on September 20, 2021. - Migrant families sent back to Haiti by the United States after attempting to enter the country from Mexico are angry at their treatment and …
PAUL RATJE/AFP via Getty Images
3:17

Illegal aliens living in the United States would stand to get about $80 billion over a 10-year period if a filibuster-proof budget reconciliation package by Senate Democrats passes through Congress, a new analysis concludes.

For months, Senate Democrats have sought to pass a $3.5 trillion budget reconciliation package that would need only majority support in the House and Senate. The reconciliation process would also prevent Senate Republicans from using the filibuster to stop the plan.

Analysis by the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) reveals that, if passed, the plan would provide illegal aliens with about $80 billion in child tax credits over the course of a decade — a massive cost to American taxpayers who would have to foot the bill.

Specifically, the plan would make President Joe Biden’s one-year Child Tax Credit (CTC) program permanent and deliver billions of dollars annually to illegal aliens who would be able to claim the tax credit without ever having to work.

“We estimate that illegal immigrants will receive $8.2 billion in payments from the new program annually — more than triple what they were eligible for under the old [Additional Child Tax Credit] — while legal immigrants will receive $17.2 billion,” Camarota explains. “The 10-year cost just for illegal immigrants would total roughly $80 billion.”

Camarota estimates that 63 percent of immigrant-headed families, including illegal and legal immigrant households, with children would receive the tax credits. Meanwhile, 52 percent of native-born American families with children would get the tax credits.

Similarly, Camarota projects that illegal aliens would score the highest tax credit payments under the plan, getting more than $5,100 while legal immigrants would secure $4,800 payments and native-born Americans would get $4,600.

(Center for Immigration Studies)

(Center for Immigration Studies)

As Breitbart News has reported, Senate Democrats want to additionally include an amnesty for illegal aliens in a reconciliation package. The Senate Parliamentarian has twice now rejected Democrat plans to slip an amnesty into the package.

The Democrats’ latest plan, which they have said they will take to the Senate Parliamentarian for approval, would halt deportations by providing most of the nation’s 11 to 22 million illegal alien population with some form of parole to keep them in the U.S.

Democrats and President Joe Biden are under intense pressure from the open borders lobby and corporate interests to ram through an amnesty in the Senate.

Most recently, open borders activists targeted Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ).

Already, the most recent research estimates that illegal immigration to the U.S. costs American taxpayers about $134 billion annually. The research suggests that each illegal alien costs taxpayers about $9,300 every year.

John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Email him at jbinder@breitbart.com. Follow him on Twitter here.


Republican Senators Try to Reward Migrants for Taking White-Collar Jobs

brexit
Christopher Furlong/Getty Images
6:53

Three Republican Senators have introduced a bill that rewards lower-wage Indian and Chinese graduates for taking white-collar jobs from a million U.S. American graduates.

The bill is led by Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC), and backed by Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) and Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) — and it would likely steer job-creating investment away from young graduates in their own states.

The bill is written to please the Senators’ home-state business communities who hire foreign graduates via the nation’s many visa-worker programs.

WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 27: Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) listens at the confirmation hearing for Secretary of Veterans Affairs nominee Denis McDonough before the Senate Veterans' Affairs Committee on Capitol Hill January 27, 2021 in Washington, DC. Previously McDonough was White House Chief of Staff and Deputy National Security Advisor in the Obama administration. (Photo by Leigh Vogel-Pool/Getty Images)

Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) listens at the confirmation hearing for Secretary of Veterans Affairs nominee Denis McDonough before the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee on Capitol Hill January 27, 2021 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Leigh Vogel-Pool/Getty Images)

But on January 6, the rising number of legal immigrants in Georgia gave the Democrats a working majority in the Senate. That loss of two seats in a formerly red state cost all 50 remaining GOP Senators — including Tillis, Paul, and Collins — their jobs as members of the Senate majority. The job loss reinforced most GOP Senators’ slow recognition that migrants who get green cards are overwhelmingly likely to vote Democratic once they become citizens five or more years later.

So the three Senators try to get around this problem by arguing to their colleagues that they are not creating new green cards. Instead, they insist they are merely reviving supposedly “unused” green cards leftover from prior, low-immigration years.

WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 30: Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) delivers remarks to Secretary of Health and Human Services Xavier Becerra as he testifies during a Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee hearing to discuss reopening schools during the COVID-19 pandemic on Capitol Hill on September 30, 2021 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Shawn Thew-Pool/Getty Images)

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) delivers remarks on Capitol Hill on September 30, 2021 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Shawn Thew-Pool/Getty Images)

“It is the immigration equivalent of an accounting sham because it ignores the statutory structure established in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) for visa allocation,” responded Rob Law, director of regulatory affairs and policy at the Center for Immigration Studies. His statement continued:

From a legal standpoint, there is no such thing as an “unused” visa. The [immigration law] affords two opportunities, one on the family-based side and one on the employment-based side, for [each] visa to be issued. If Congress had intended the annual immigrant visa levels to be an entitlement, it would have structured the legal immigration system in a way that perpetually retained all possible visas subject to a numerical limit. It expressly did not, so the concept of “visa recapture” is bogus.

Even if visa recapture was a plausible legal interpretation of the INA, it would be a terrible policy decision to authorize it as it would exclusively reward one industry (tech) that has systematically exploited the immigration system to harm American workers.

The bill would reward foreign visa workers in technology and Fortune 500 companies for their long-ago decision to take U.S.-based jobs from U.S. graduates. The Indians and Chinese took the jobs after corporate executives outsourced the jobs via the H-1B, OPT, L-1, and J-1 programs.

WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 10: Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) speaks as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Marcia Fudge appears to testify during a Senate Appropriations Subcommittee hearing on June 10, 2021 at the Dirksen Senate Office Building in Washington, DC. The committee is hearing testimony on the proposed HUD 2022 budget. (Photo by Matt McClain-Pool/Getty Images)

Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) speaks on June 10, 2021 at the Dirksen Senate Office Building in Washington, DC. (Photo by Matt McClain-Pool/Getty Images)

The GOP bill would also help U.S. executives to hire the next wave of Indian and Chinese workers. Nearly all of those foreign workers take outsourced jobs in the hope of getting green cards in the future, and the 80,000 green cards offered by the bill will allow the current and the next wave of visa workers to get their green card prizes even faster.

Many executives favor visa outsourcing because it reduces their payroll costs and also gives them a compliant workforce that can be hired and fired at will. They know that outsourcing also reduces their unwanted reliance on outspoken American graduates, who are able to disagree with their executives, quit, or even launch a rival company.

Millions of American graduates have lost jobs or careers to the imported army of “green card workers,” which is now at least 1 million strong. Democrats are now working with Fortune 500 investors to dramatically expand the size of this indentured-professional class of employees.

The GOP bill also would make it more difficult for American college graduates to get jobs in Kentucky, Maine, North Carolina, or elsewhere.

The various visa-worker programs allow investors to hire visa workers for lower-wage jobs in high-cost California, New York, and Texas. Without the cheap-labor programs, the investors would be under more marketplace pressure to built tech centers in lower-cost Kentucky Maine, Ohio, North Dakota, Montana, Nebraska and other heartland states.

In August, Breitbart News publicized data by Mark Zuckerberg’s FWD.us group of investors which showed that most of the migration benefits from amnesty go the big coastal states:

The forgotten northeastern states would be pushed further behind by the amnesty. Vermont, New Hampshire, and Maine would get roughly a windfall of $200 million,  or 1/600 of the gains promised by FWD.us investors, if Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT), Sen. Bernie Sanders (D-VT), Susan Collins (R-ME), Angus King (I-ME),  Sen. Maggie Hassan (D-NH) and Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) vote for the amnesty.

In 2020, the three states got roughly $80 of investment capital per resident, while Massachusetts picked up $2,400 per resident; Why would nearby investors in New York create jobs in these states if the federal government legalizes millions of workers closer to New York — and is also flying more legal immigrants into La Guardia airport every day?

In contrast, many businesses — such as major banks and insurance firms — in Tillis’ state of North Carolina have hired H-1B, L-1, and OPT workers. His legislation would help many of the resident Indian and Chinese workers in his state win fast-track green cards — and overwhelmingly vote Democratic after Tillis retires.

Meanwhile, the American graduates who lose jobs to the imported Indian and Chinese workers are also likely to vote Democratic, in part, because Tillis has been an outspoken advocate for outsourcing since he worked at IBM.

Since Tillis left IBM, the top management has been given over to Indian-born managers who have embraced woke causes and hired more Indian workers for low-wage, lower-tech jobs in the United States.

Tillis’ website does not mention the job-outsourcing bill, but does tout his symbolic opposition to illegal migration, and his support for soldiers and police.

The Congress.gov site says the Senators’ bill would:

authorize U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services to process employment-based immigrant visa applications after September 30, 2021, and to award such visas to eligible applicants from the pool of unused employment-based immigrant visas during fiscal years 2020 and 2021.

Democrats are expected to oppose the bill because they want to get even more migrants turned into Democratic-voting citizens.

Wholesale Invasion USA

Waves of illegal immigrants flood across the U.S. southern border - with no end in sight.

  14 comments

The Biden administration is aiding and abetting a wholesale invasion of the United States by illegal immigrants, with no idea of whether they are infected with COVID-19 or not. The waves of illegal immigrants, encouraged by President Biden’s open-border policies, keep coming, with no end in sight.

Last month an estimated 20,000 Haitian immigrants entered the country illegally in successive groups that overwhelmed border control agents. The Haitians huddled close together in squalid conditions under the International Bridge in the border town of Del Rio, Texas. They weren’t immediately tested - or vaccinated - for COVID-19.  

That’s on top of the more than a million U.S. Customs and Border Protection Patrol encounters with illegal immigrants along the southwest border with Mexico from the time the Biden administration took office through August 2021.

The Biden administration claims that it is using its congressional heath emergency authority under Title 42 to expel migrants entering the United States who have recently been in a country where COVID-19 or other communicable diseases were present. However, the administration has been using Title 42 far too sparingly in comparison with the Trump administration. Biden is, clearly, stepping very gingerly to make sure that he doesn't antagonize his leftwing progressive base.

Last month’s hordes of illegal Haitian immigrants are no longer camped under the International Bridge. Some were deported, but the majority of these Haitians have remained in this country. Under the Biden administration’s disastrous catch and release policy, thousands of them have been dispersed all across the country -- and the administration didn't bother to test or vaccinate the illegal immigrants before they were released. 

In short, Americans are being put in dire -- and needless -- danger because of Biden’s destructive and reckless policies.

Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas estimated that about 12,000 of the illegal Haitian immigrants who had gathered in Del Rio were released from detention and have remained in the country. “I do not know if anyone was sick with Covid," Mayorkas said. The Biden administration decided that it wasn’t worth finding out or taking precautions with vaccinations.

White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki provided a bizarre explanation as to why the Biden administration imposed no COVID-19 vaccination or testing requirements on the illegal Haitian immigrants, stating that the Haitians are “not intending to stay here for a lengthy period of time.” At the same time, the administration is busy moving ahead with its executive mandate that American businesses with more than 100 employees ensure that their employees are either vaccinated or tested weekly.

Even one day is too long for thousands of illegal immigrants to stay in in America. But Psaki knows full well that the illegal Haitian immigrants whom the Biden administration has released from detention will stay in the United States for as long as they can. Their immigration hearings won’t take place for months or years down the road, if at all. And many will skip the hearings altogether, attempting to melt into the communities where they will be living. 

Alarmingly, the invasion is far from over. Axios has reported on Panama’s Foreign Minister Erika Mouynes’ recent warning that “there are as many as 60,000 migrants — mostly Haitian — poised to make their way north to the U.S.-Mexico border.”

Article 4, Section 4 of the United States Constitution states that the United States shall “protect” each of the states “against Invasion.” Because of the Biden administration’s open-border policies, Texas and other border states have become ground zero for this year’s invasion of illegal immigrants. 

The Biden administration should be using Title 42 far more aggressively to keep out or expel as many illegal immigrants as possible while the pandemic rages on. Instead, when border patrol agents on horseback tried to maneuver their horses on tough terrain in an effort to contain the border invasion, President Biden rushed to judgment with unfounded accusations against the agents. Biden claimed that Haitians trying to cross illegally into the United States had been “strapped.” 

I promise you, those people will pay,” Biden said. He based his Alice and Wonderland “Sentence first—verdict afterwards” pronouncement on murky images taken by a photographer who said that he hadn’t seen any whippings. Biden made his pronouncement before an investigation into what happened is concluded. 

The Left exploited the images to play their usual race card and divert attention from the humanitarian crisis at the border that the Biden administration has created. Leftists propogate that the U.S. government is violating some concocted version of international “norms” when the government takes steps to protect American citizens from foreign intruders -- who may also be carriers of the coronavirus.

United Nations bureaucrats often try to weaponize so-called “international law” and “international norms” to challenge national sovereignty. On September 30th, four UN agencies, undoubtedly with the United States in mind, issued a joint statement calling on

states to refrain from expelling Haitians without proper assessment of their individual protection needs, to uphold the fundamental human rights of Haitians on the move, and to offer protection mechanisms or other legal stay arrangements for more effective access to regular migration pathways.

Last month, the UN’s top refugee official, Filippo Grandi, had the audacity to scold the United States explicitly for expelling some Haitians who had illegally crossed the U.S.-Mexico border in recent weeks. 

Grandi said, "The summary, mass expulsions of individuals currently under way under the Title 42 authority, without screening for protection needs, is inconsistent with international norms and may constitute refoulement."

Grandi didn’t say a word about screening for COVID-19 or requiring vaccinations for all Haitians and other migrants seeking to enter the United States. What about the protection of Americans needlessly exposed to the virus? That’s of little importance to globalists like Grandi.

Grandi seems to think that all migrants entering the United States illegally should be considered potential refugees entitled to special protections until their requests for asylum are fully considered on an individual basis. He has obviously not listened to the migrants themselves, many of whom have admitted that they made the long trek to seek better economic opportunities. They weren’t fleeing persecution.

In fact, many of the Haitians who have recently arrived in the United States haven’t lived in Haiti for years. They came from more stable South American countries such as Chile where they settled years ago. Only recently, after President Joe Biden put out his welcome mat, did they decide that it was time to leave their adopted countries and pursue their economic dreams in the United States. 

United Nations bureaucrats have no business telling the U.S. government what it can or cannot do in trying to keep Americans safe from hordes of individuals untested and unvaccinated for the coronavirus seeking to enter this country illegally. As far as the American people are concerned, so-called “international norms” do not override the U.S. Constitution, which is the supreme law of the United States.

Putting aside the UN’s blatant attempt to interfere with U.S. national sovereignty, which is bad enough, the UN lacks any moral authority to serve as the Haitians’ advocate. In fact, the United Nations should be the last organization to lecture anyone about protecting Haitian lives or human rights. 

UN peacekeepers caused a massive cholera outbreak in Haiti in 2010, which killed close to 10,000 people and sickened hundreds of thousands more Haitians. It took six years for the UN to even admit, as a factual matter, that its peacekeepers were involved in triggering the deadly cholera outbreak. Even then, the UN has continued to hide behind so-called “international law” to assert absolute immunity from any legal liability to fully compensate the victims and their families for what happened because of the gross negligence of UN peacekeepers in Haiti.

Philip Alston, the former UN Special Rapporteur on Extreme Poverty & Human Rights, was appalled at how the UN bureaucracy treated the Haitians it was supposed to care for. Alston told the Miami Herald last year:

The tragic and deplorable fact is that 10 years after bringing cholera to Haiti through the negligence and mismanagement of its peacekeeping troops, the United Nations has still never acknowledged its responsibility, never apologized for having caused the cholera outbreak, and never provided direct compensation to the families of the more than 10,000 people who died as a result.

Americans don’t need any self-righteous lectures from Filippo Grandi or other UN officials about how illegal immigrants potentially carrying the coronavirus into the United States and becoming super spreaders should be treated.

In any event, the sad truth is that so long as the open-border Biden administration is in charge and defers to the wishes of globalist institutions, Grandi and his other UN cohorts have free license to castigate -- and work to weaken -- the United States.


No comments: