Watters' World' investigates Nancy Pelosi's financial dealings
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3M4QZJxb9Dw
“Protect and enrich.” This is a perfect encapsulation of the Clinton Foundation and the Obama book and television deals. Then there is the Biden family corruption, followed closely behind by similar abuses of power and office by the Warren and Sanders families, as Peter Schweizer described in his recent book “Profiles in Corruption.” These names just scratch the surface of government corruption. BRIAN C JOONDEPH
Rep. Banks: ‘Nancy Pelosi Is Older Than My Grandma … I Don’t Believe My Grandma Is Capable of Leading This Country’
(CNSNews.com) - Rep. Jim Banks (R-Ind.) reacted to news that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) plans to run for Congress again and President Biden plans to run for re-election, saying that Pelosi and Biden are too old to lead the country.
Pelosi is 81 years old, and Biden is 79.
“If you think about it this has been a pretty lucrative career for Nancy Pelosi. She was worth about $3 million when she started out in Congress, today she is worth $200 million, so why not keep doing it? It's awfully lucrative, but the fact of the matter is Nancy Pelosi is older than my grandma. I love my grandma. Joe Biden is the same age as my grandma,” Banks told Fox News’ “The Ingraham Angle” on Monday.
“I don't believe my grandma is capable of leading this country. She's not capable of certainly even filing my taxes, but if that's the future of the Democrat Party, it tells you everything you need to know about where they want to drive this country,” the congressman said.
“A very wise businessman in my district tells me you shouldn't put 80-year-old people in the position to make 20, 40, 50 year decisions for a business or for our country, and that's what the Democrats are trying to do,” he said.
Hoover Institution Senior Fellow Victor Davis Hanson, echoed Banks’ statement, saying that if Pelosi, Biden, Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) were to retire, they would be replaced by “some crazy people” like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio (D-N.Y.) and “The Squad.”
Well, she's in her mid-70s too, and remember Dick Durbin, the third man in the Senate? He’s 76. Bernie’s 80. So they are all octogenarians or septuagenarian's and they are not going to retire, Laura. What else would they do? They've been in politics their entire life. They know they have driven the Democratic party over the cliff.
If they retire now, they will take a big beating in 2022 and 2024, and they are going to be blamed for it. They got on this left-wing tiger and they got on the back of it, ‘The Squad’ as you said, AOC, BLM, and even Antifa they winked and nodded on, and they can't get off the tiger.
If they were to retire and jump off, who would take their place? Some crazy people, and they know it and they've wrecked the Democratic Party, because they didn't have a graduated retirement. They didn't bring in new people because they were narcissists and egotists and they thought they could stay there forever, and now they've been sabotaged or hijacked by the hard left.
All they have now, as you reviewed, is they have January 6th, Donald Trump is a monster, lockdown forever, and they got a new one that Hillary is hinting at, and they've all got -- Adam Schiff that if the Republicans win in 2022 or '24, we’re going to have an autocracy, a dictatorship, the end of democracy, and all that means is that the polls are against them now.
Right after the election when Biden won, they were saying the system has been redeemed, democracy is fresh, and then they had 10 months and they ran their poles in the ground and they had the most unpopular agendas in recent memory.
Banks said that the Democrats’ only agenda is power, and he pointed to HR1 as an example.
“Remember, their only agenda is power, HR 1, symbolically their most important item that they put forward in the Congress, is a bill to give them permanent power by changing election rules to give Democrats an advantage on election day and make D.C. a state so they get two more Democrat senators, public financing of campaigns so we all get the opportunity to contribute to Bernie Sanders for president every year, every four years with our tax dollars,” he said.
“That's their agenda - permanent power,” the congressman said.
Pelosi: Joe Biden Is 'Just Perfect'; ‘Our Country...Could Not Be Better Served'
(CNSNews.com) - House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) is not among the majority of Americans who give President Biden low marks for the job he is doing as president. In fact, according to Pelosi, Biden is "just perfect."
Speaking at a Democratic National Committee holiday celebration Tuesday night -- with Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris in attendance -- Pelosi simply gushed:
It's wonderful to be here with all of you, to celebrate the holidays and the historic progress Democrats are forging for the people -- under the leadership of the great president of the United States, Joe Biden. And Vice President Kamala Harris," Pelosi began.
She praised her Democrat caucus, for "understanding our why. Our why is to lift up all American families and to be able to just fight in every zip code, and (DNC Chairman) Jamie Harrison is leading the way on that.
And Mr. President, it is an honor and, of course, a pleasure to be here at this time of challenge -- and with the coronavirus, the national insecurity for families, natural disasters.
Our country could not be more -- it could not be better served, than with this most experienced, capable hands than yours, President Biden. He's just perfect! The timing couldn't be better.
And Madam Vice President, we're inspired by your work for the people as you continue to be a valuable partner to President Biden.
Pelosi told the crowd she would be brief, because "we have three bills on the floor tonight," including one to lift the debt ceiling (so Congress can keep spending). "I thank the president for his leadership in that regard," Pelosi said.
Pelosi brought up the 2020 midterm election, calling it "a historic time for our country."
"It's not just about policy, it's not about politics, it's about patriotism. It's about our country. It's about our democracy being on the line. And that we have to work very hard -- I've said to members, are you all making a decision to win the election? ("Yeah," the crowd shouted. "Yeah," they shouted a second time, cued by Pelosi to say it much louder.)
"If so, we have to make every decision in favor of winning the election...to save our democracy."
Pelosi again praised President Biden for orchestrating the bipartisan infrastructure bill, "which is great," she said. "But what he said, too, was, I did not confine my vision for America to only what is in that bill. We must Build Back Better..."
The greed for power of the Democrats is endless
Almost all the Democrat policy proposals involve transferring more power and money from the rest of the country to the extremely powerful federal government.
While the Dems seek to destroy the millions of jobs related to oil, natural gas, and coal they seek to make more people dependent on the government.
Democrats claim they care deeply about wealth and income inequality, yet they seek to transfer more wealth and income to the extremely wealthy DC area where they produce nothing but regulations and bureaucracy.
Most Of Nation’s Wealthiest Counties In DC Area
Once a government policy or bureaucracy starts, it is very hard to stop, and the budget and power almost always expands. There is little effort to control costs.
The following article shows at least 456 agencies and there is little evidence anyone tries to eliminate duplicate goals. Does anyone think Pelosi, Schumer, Biden or anyone else can describe what these agencies do?
Look at what falls under the agriculture umbrella:
“In 1900, there (were) 11 million Americans employed on farms – and 2,900 employed by the USDA. A century later there are 3 million employed on farms – and 105,000 employed by the USDA.”
Each agency is essentially its own fiefdom lobbying for more money. They determine where their money goes.
For example, the NIH handed out grants that ended up in the hands of the Wuhan lab which may have used the funds for gain of function research.
456 Federal Agencies? The Eternal Push for Ever-Expanding, Redundant Over-Government
Here’s a Fun Number of the Day. I just ran a Web search for “how many federal agencies are there” — and the Internet extruded the number FOUR HUNDRED AND FIFTY-SIX (456).
To wit: The human species has engaged in agriculture for more than 10,000 years. We did so for 9,900+ of those years without a US Department of Agriculture (USDA). Which now appears to have THIRTY-THREE (33) “Offices” under its umbrella.
Which is pathetically unreflective of today’s agriculture sector. The proportion of Americans engaged in agriculture has plummeted — while the Department of Agriculture has massively expanded:
“In 1900, there (were) 11 million Americans employed on farms – and 2,900 employed by the USDA. A century later there are 3 million employed on farms – and 105,000 employed by the USDA.”
Besides the agencies that fall under the Congressional budget, there are several more entities that are essentially government agencies that wield massive control. None of these entities pay federal or state taxes.
The Federal Reserve has expenses of over $5 billion each year and over 23,000 employees. They have $8.7 trillion in assets.
The average salary is approximately $100,000 per year.
The CFPB was established by Congress, but it was set up as an "independent agency to give it more power.
The budget is around $700 million per year. It has around 1,600 employees
The average employee salary for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) in 2020 was $125,476.
(https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/IF10031.pdf; https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_performance-plan-and-report_fy20.pdf;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consumer_Financial_Protection_Bureau;
https://openpayrolls.com/federal/consumer-financial-protection-bureau)
Fannie Mae has $3.5 Trillion in assets. They have 7,500 employees. Average salary $93,000 per year. Five people at Fannie Mae made more than $2 million and four people at Freddie made more than $3 million despite a $600,000 cap on salaries. Where are the congressional hearings by Schiff and Pelosi?
How Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac dodged a $600,000 cap on CEO pay
At Fannie Mae, five executives earned more than $2 million each last year, while four executives at Freddie Mac earned more than $3 million, according to data compiled by Equilar, a research firm. The total amount spent on salaries for the top executives increased 31 percent at Fannie Mae and 4 percent at Freddie Mac last year, according to the data.
Freddie Mac. 2.1 trillion in assets and around 7,000 employees. Average salary $95,000.
The Federal Reserve, Fannie, and Freddie essentially have an almost monopolistic control over housing. It’s as if they never learn from previous bubbles and subsequent crashes.
Average salary of U.S worker is around $70,000. Average salary of U.S government employee is $90,000 and their pension and other benefits dwarf the private sector. Yet the Democrats focus on increasing government power and money.
Average $90,510 Salary and Other Traits of 2.1 Million+ Federal Employees
As if politicians didn’t have enough money in the regular budget to funnel to their special interest groups, the corrupt Obama, Biden administration had slush funds at the Justice Department, EPA, and CFPB to give kickbacks to their special interest groups.
These special interest groups gave some money back to Democrats for campaign contributions and used significant funds to lobby for Democrat policies and against Republican policies.
How Obama is funding the anti-Trump resistance
The Obama administration’s massive shakedown of Big Banks over the mortgage crisis included unprecedented back-door funding for dozens of Democratic activist groups who were not even victims of the crisis.
At least three liberal nonprofit organizations the Justice Department approved to receive funds from multibillion-dollar mortgage settlements were instrumental in killing the ObamaCare repeal bill and are now lobbying against GOP tax reform, as well as efforts to rein in illegal immigration.
THE NATIONAL COUNCIL OF LA RAZA
NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE
NATIONAL COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT COALITION
Is there any wonder there is so much corruption in the U.S when most of the media looks the other way and hides it?
CFPB Joins Justice In Shaking Down Banks For Democrat Activist Groups
CFPB Joins Justice In Shaking Down Banks For Democrat Activist Groups The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is diverting potentially millions of dollars in settlement payments for alleged victims of lending bias to a slush fund for poverty groups tied to the Democratic Party.
We've seen this before at the Justice Department, which Congress earlier this year scolded for "shortchanging" alleged victims of Bank of America and Citibank the same way. Justice funneled at least $150 million into a slush fund for Democratic interests, unconstitutionally avoiding Congress.
The EPA Stashes BILLIONS In Slush Fund-Like Accounts
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) officials have accumulated at least $6.3 billion in more than 1,300 obscure spending accounts akin to slush funds that are essentially beyond congressional, media and public scrutiny.
Trump got rid of the slush funds, but the corrupt Biden reinstated the Justice slush fund the first day he took office. And the media pretends that the Biden Justice department is independent and honest.
Biden Directs DOJ to Reinstate ‘Slush Fund’ Settlement Payments to Special Interest Groups
If Democrats really cared about the common good, they would give more freedom, power and money to the common person, instead of the government. We would drill to lower prices.
THE BARONESS OF LA RAZA NANCY PELOSI AND HER TESLA STOCK CON
The president shared a clip Monday highlighting a CBS 60 Minutes report featuring author and Breitbart senior contributor Peter Schweizer’s investigation into Pelosi and her husband participating in at least eight different stock IPOs while in Congress.
THE DEMOCRAT PARTY OF INFLUENCE PEDDLERS, BRIBES SUCKERS AND CORPORATE RENT BOYS FOR HIRE
THE CASE AGAINST NANCY PELOSI, SILENT PARTNER AND ABETTER TO SOME OF THE MOST CORRUPT POLITICIANS IN U.S. HISTORY, INCLUDING HER COLLEAGE DIANNE FEINSTEIN, KAMALA HARRIS, JOE BIDEN AND THE BIDEN CRIME FAMILY, HILLARY AND BILLARY AND THE OBOMBS WITH THEIR $500K BANKSTER SPEECH FEE BRIBES AND FRAUDULENT $62 MILLION BOOK DEAL THE TAX PAYERS ACTUALLY PAID FOR.
THE DEMOCRAT PARTY'S BRIBES SUCKING KLEPTOCRACY
Watters' World' investigates Nancy Pelosi's financial dealings
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3M4QZJxb9Dw
Nancy Pelosi, a horrid woman equally as without heart and soul, on Tuesday refused to have the names of the thirteen soldiers killed in Kabul read out on the floor of the House. That should permanently indict her for being the wicked witch she is. She is more devious, more calculating than the irresponsible Biden but every bit as beyond redemption as he is. She will do anything to try to convince the American people, for whom she has only contempt, that whatever she and her party do is righteous no matter how loathsome and totalitarian. PATRICIA McCARTHY
Pelosi Pushes Electric Vehicle Subsidies As Husband’s Tesla Stock Soars
Paul Pelosi owns up to $1 million of Tesla call options
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's (D., Calif.) husband hit pay dirt on Monday as Tesla's valuation rose to $1 trillion.
The news comes as Pelosi spearheads legislation that doles out tens of billions of dollars in subsidies to the electric vehicle industry, including Tesla, with provisions to build charging stations for cars and incentivize electric car purchases through tax credits.
The financial dealings of Pelosi's husband, Paul, came under scrutiny earlier this year when he purchased as much as $1 million of Tesla call options, one of the largest transactions of Tesla shares disclosed by a member of Congress. At the time, Republicans charged that the House speaker was cashing in on her power.
Members of Congress and their spouses are legally allowed to buy and sell stock, as long as it is not based on insider information. Members are required to disclose their transactions to the House Committee on Ethics, as Pelosi did with the Tesla transaction on Jan. 21.
Pelosi is spearheading negotiations with the White House as Democrats look to pass Joe Biden's Build Back Better plan and a reconciliation bill that includes the electric car incentives. Tesla, a pioneer in the electric car industry, is poised to see a significant boost from the legislation, according to industry watchers.
Democrats are proposing nearly $120 billion to fund various clean energy projects, and another $34.5 billion dedicated to zero-emission vehicles. The reconciliation bill also proposes $42 billion in tax credits for purchases of electric vehicles, which Democrats hope will incentivize new car buyers to purchase electric vehicles instead of gas-powered cars. The bill offers up to $12,500 in credits for each car. It also calls for tens of billions of dollars in spending to build charging stations for electric cars across the country.
Tesla's dramatic rise is likely attributable to several factors beyond the Democrats' spending proposals. Tesla founder Elon Musk recently announced he is moving the company's headquarters from California to Texas, which has no state income tax. Tesla's cars have also gained in popularity without federal incentives.
And while Tesla and other clean energy companies stand to gain with environmentally friendly Democrats in power, the company opposes some aspects of the reconciliation proposal, such as an additional credit for the purchase of electric cars made in unionized factories. Musk has publicly opposed unionization efforts.
Pelosi's office did not respond to requests for comment.
RIDING THE DRAGON: The Bidens' Chinese Secrets (Full Documentary)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRmlcEBAiIs
CHINA’S OLD WHORE SEN. DIANNE FEINSTEIN, AMERICA’S BIGGEST WAR PROFITEER, WAS FIRST TO ENDORSE BIDEN FOR PRESIDENT. WONDER WHY???
As Glenn Bunting of the Los Angeles Times reported in 1997, Feinstein’s husband Richard Blum “has expanded his private business interests in China – to the point that his firm is now a prominent investor inside the communist nation.” In 1995, Dianne Feinstein became a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, “giving her a prominent platform for her efforts to support China’s trade privileges.”
As Ben Weingarten noted in the Federalist in 2018, Feinstein’s husband has “profited handsomely from the greatly expanded China trade she supported.” The senator also “served as a key intermediary between China and the U.S. government, while serving on committees whose work would be of keen interest to the PRC.”
For 20 years, through three election cycles, Feinstein maintained on her staff a Chinese spy who would even attend consular functions for the California Democrat. One wonders what the FBI knew, when they knew it, and what they did about it, if anything.
Other politicians with China business connections include Mitch McConnell and Nancy Pelosi, whose husband has conducted a series of deals in the Communist nation. Recall that Speaker Pelosi kept Eric Swalwell on the House Intelligence Committee even after his “PoonFang” liaisons with a Chinese spy (FEINSTEIN LONG EMPLOYED A CHINESE SPY).
Donald Trump Questions Nancy Pelosi’s Corruption
President Donald Trump questioned House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s dubious participation in stock market initial public offering shares, enriching her family.
The president shared a clip Monday highlighting a CBS 60 Minutes report featuring author and Breitbart senior contributor Peter Schweizer’s investigation into Pelosi and her husband participating in at least eight different stock IPOs while in Congress.
"The House gone rogue! I want to remind you a little bit about the ring leader in this whole rogue operation against the President of the United States..." @MarkLevinShow
60 Minutes reporter Steve Kroft confronted Pelosi on the topic in 2011, but she denied any impropriety.
The report noted that Pelosi and her husband participated in an initial public offering of Visa in 2008, while credit card regulation was underway in the House of Representatives. The Pelosis bought 5,000 shares at the initial price of $44 and shares were trading at $64 just two days later, according to the report.
“Congress has never done more for consumers nor has the Congress passed more critical reforms of the credit card industry than under the Speakership of Nancy Pelosi,” Pelosi spokesman, Drew Hammill, said in a statement, according to CNN after the 60 Minutes report aired.
The clip was featured on Mark Levin’s Fox News show Life, Liberty and Levin on Sunday.
Turns out Biden's family not the only one to benefit from Ukrainian fossil fuels
By Howard J. Warner
On Sept. 24, 2019, Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced the official impeachment inquiry that would be led by the Intelligence Committee and Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.). At first, this was a curious decision to objective persons, since the Judiciary Committee has the authority over this type of procedure. At the time, Pelosi indicated a threat by President Donald Trump to our national security during the July 25 conversation between him and President Zelensky of Ukraine. She did this without the benefit of the transcript, but she doubtless already knew much of the CIA "whistleblower's" complaint. Further, the Ukrainian president disputes her version.
But this is not the rationale for her haste to convene the investigation. It appears that the D.C. swamp benefits another powerful family. The Biden family has gotten special treatment from Ukrainian oil interests, and the Pelosi family has a similar advantage. Paul Pelosi, Jr. was a board member of Viscoil and an executive at its related company NRGLab, which was involved in energy business in Ukraine. Perhaps the use of the Intelligence Committee has given the Democrats the opportunity to limit Republican questioning and maintain secrecy over the responses from subpoenaed witnesses. This would prevent any official record implicating Pelosi's son. This also explains her reluctance to take a vote authorizing the investigation, since the minority party would gain some rights.
This is interesting also since much of the Democratic Party rejects carbon-based energy sources. Biden has made this a part of his campaign. The Green New Deal proposals will eventually end dependency on oil and gas as an energy source. But this does not stop these politicos from benefiting financially from this sector of the economy. This reminds one of the financial benefits that Al Gore's father had from Occidental Petroleum, which was one of the great polluters (remember Love Canal?). He chose to make money selling carbon offsets to atone and make his own name.
The Ukrainian oil company Burisma used many well connected members of the D.C. establishment connected to the Obama administration. This interlocking swamp is a threat to the USA. But the media have managed to convince a vast number of Americans that Trump is the threat. When Trump railed against Pelosi in Louisiana on Friday, he was accusing her of not just splitting the nation politically, but also ignoring the financial benefits to powerful families at the detriment of our national security. This also helps explain the constant discussion in public about Biden's son Hunter, in addition to the political advantage he might gain.
No wonder the establishment (including many Republicans) wants to impeach Trump. Family security always "trumps" national security in the D.C. swamp.
SURELY YOU DO NOT BELIEVE THAT PELOSI PAYS A LIVING WAGES TO HER ILLEGALS WORKING AT HER ST. HELENA, NAPA COUNTY, MEXIFORNIA WINERY, DO YOU?
NANCY PELOSI GOT RICH OFF ELECTED OFFICE AND SERVICING THE “CHEAP”
LABOR LOBBIES - Jim Gilchrist asked the question about Nancy Pelosi’s ethics that should be on the minds of every law-abiding American – including those immigrants who are following the law to become citizens here the proper way: “Do we really need a House Speaker whose every action is calculated to enhance her own financial interests, instead of focusing on how porous borders will affect the security of everyday American citizens?”
CALL NANCY PELOSI Washington , DC - (202) 225-4965 San Francisco , CA - (415) 556-4862
EMAIL NANCY PELOSI sf.nancy@mail.house.gov
Gilchrist was reacting to my report several weeks ago in FrontPage Magazine that Pelosi – who owns non-union vineyards in Napa Valley where grape-picking depends chiefly on the availability of cheap foreign labor – is doing everything she can to help open the floodgates to more illegal immigration. And she wants the American taxpayers to pay their way. As even more proof of this than I previously reported, Pelosi does not want employers like her to be required to pay the cost of illegal aliens’ hospital care. She voted against a bill that would make employers liable for the reimbursements if an undocumented employee seeks medical attention. And she voted in favor of rewarding illegal aliens from Mexico with Social Security benefits.
Pelosi's Stake in Illegal Immigration
________________________________________
The Minuteman Project, founded by Jim Gilchrist (who is also the co-author of the book Minutemen: The Battle to Secure America’s Borders), is made up of citizen volunteers who watch our border with Mexico and report illegal entry to the border patrol. For performing that thankless task in full compliance with the law, Gilchrist and his colleagues have been falsely maligned as fascists, racists, and even murderers. They have been driven off the speaker’s platform at Columbia University and vilified by Leftist politicians and their handmaidens in the liberal press.
So it was no surprise that the mainstream media chose to ignore a recent press release, issued by his publisher, in which Gilchrist asked the question about Nancy Pelosi’s ethics that should be on the minds of every law-abiding American – including those immigrants who are following the law to become citizens here the proper way: “Do we really need a House Speaker whose every action is calculated to enhance her own financial interests, instead of focusing on how porous borders will affect the security of everyday American citizens?”
Gilchrist did not stop there. He demanded an investigation into Pelosi’s “economic stake in just the kind of illegal alien exploitation that we deplore in Minutemen.” But you would never know it from the liberal media, who - while ignoring this demand - have had no compunctions in calling for Speaker Hastert’s head in the wake of the Foley page controversy.
Gilchrist was reacting to my report several weeks ago in FrontPage Magazine that Pelosi – who owns non-union vineyards in Napa Valley where grape-picking depends chiefly on the availability of cheap foreign labor – is doing everything she can to help open the floodgates to more illegal immigration. And she wants the American taxpayers to pay their way. As even more proof of this than I previously reported, Pelosi does not want employers like her to be required to pay the cost of illegal aliens’ hospital care. She voted against a bill that would make employers liable for the reimbursements if an undocumented employee seeks medical attention. And she voted in favor of rewarding illegal aliens from Mexico with Social Security benefits.
At the same time, Pelosi has led the Democratic opposition to any effective border controls or documentation requirements. She opposed the Secure Fence Act of 2006, signed into law by President Bush, and voted against final passage of a border security and enforcement bill in 2005 which required that all businesses must use an electronic system to check if all new hires have the legal right to work in this country. She voted against a bill to bar drivers' licenses for illegal aliens in 2005. This year she opposed legislation requiring presentation of a legitimate government-issued photo ID to prove eligibility to vote, claiming that “there is little evidence anywhere in the country of a significant problem with non-citizen voters.” She is dead wrong. For example, an accused terrorist by the name of Nuradin Abdi was just recently reported to have illegally registered to vote at the Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles. Nuradin Abdi was indicted earlier this year as part of a conspiracy to blow up the Columbus Mall.
How many other terrorist suspects may have slipped through the system because Leftists like Pelosi oppose any meaningful screens? Instead she continues to advocate our recognition of the flimsy, non-validated ID card that the Mexican consulates provide to illegal aliens before they cross over our border, called the “matricula consular”, which gives them phony documentation to set up bank accounts, apply for jobs, obtain social benefits, board airplanes, identify themselves to police, enter buildings that require IDs, obtain drivers’ licenses and then perhaps use those drivers’ licenses to try to illegally register to vote in our elections.
Pelosi also believes in giving sanctuary to illegal aliens. She opposed legislation to deny federal homeland security funding to state and local governments who refuse to share information they learn about an individual's immigration status with Federal immigration authorities. Pelosi’s hometown of San Francisco is one of the sanctuary cities she voted to protect for the benefit of illegal aliens. Pelosi even voted against strengthening our immigration law with regard to the deportability of alien terrorists.
Jim Gilchrist cut to the chase with this devastating observation that the mainstream media does not want you to read:
"As we’ve shown again and again in ‘Minutemen,’ the Democrats aren’t just hypocrites, but are working actively to subvert our legislative system to their own ends. Their only goal is votes, votes and more votes, no matter where they come from, no matter if they’re cast legally, no matter whether the person casting them is dead, alive, a citizen or an illegal alien."
Pelosi sees Jim Gilchrist’s Minutemen Project as a threat to her pro-illegal alien agenda. More illegal aliens mean more votes for the Democrats and more grape-pickers for Napa Valley vineyards like hers. So she even voted against a measure that would have cut off the use of U.S. taxpayers’ funds to tip off illegal aliens as to where the Minutemen citizen patrols may be located! She obviously wants to see the Minutemen put out of business – permanently. She can count on the liberal press to distort the work of the Minutemen and to keep out of the public eye Gilchrist’s pointed questions about her motivations for helping illegal aliens during the run-up to the mid-term elections that may make her the next Speaker of the House.
Gilchrist, of course, is accustomed to being vilified and prevented by the Left from getting his message out. In early October, he was prevented from finishing his speech at the "Minutemen Forum" sponsored by the Columbia College Republicans. Gilchrist had spoken for just a few minutes and managed to utter the words “I love the First Amendment” when a group of radical protestors took the stage and interrupted him, displaying a big banner saying "There are no illegals." More protestors then stormed the stage. Chaos erupted and the audience members who had come to hear Gilchrist speak never got the chance, which was precisely the protestors’ objective. As reported online by the staff of Columbia’s undergraduate newspaper, “a mosh pit of triumphal students and community members danced and chanted outside, "Asian, Black, Brown and White, we smashed the Minutemen tonight!" They also put out a statement declaring:
“The Minutemen are not a legitimate voice in the debate on immigration. They are a racist, armed militia who have declared open hunting season on immigrants, causing countless hate crimes and over 3000 deaths on the border. Why should exploitative corporations have free passes between nations, but individual people not? No human being is illegal.” (Emphasis added)
We have come to the point in this country where a bunch of radical protestors get to decide who is and who is not a legitimate voice in the debate on as critical a public policy issue as immigration. Such Leftists think that migration in a borderless world is a basic human right. They want no barriers, no guards, and no proof of lawful residency. They certainly do not want the Minutemen watching the border and reporting illegal entry to the authorities.
Leftist slogans like “no human being is illegal” are red herrings. It is not the human being who is illegal; it is what the human being does that may be illegal. One’s conduct is the test, not simply who one is. Immigrants who follow our rules are welcome here. Those who do not abide by our laws have no right to be here. A person who breaks into your house without your permission does not deserve room, board and a job as a reward, even if the intruder may be much poorer than you. He has broken the law and deserves to be punished for what he has done. Our country’s boundaries and rules for entry and residency similarly define who is permitted to be here and how we choose to protect ourselves. We are a land of immigrants, but we are also a land of laws with certain core values. Those seeking to enter our country and remain here must learn to accommodate to our laws and values, not the other way around. That is the way prior generations of immigrants did it, including those who passed through Ellis Island. Why should the law be thrown aside now?
What we are witnessing is a frontal challenge to our nation’s sovereignty. Mexico’s Foreign Secretary wants to drag us before the United Nations for intending to build a fence on our side of the border with our money to keep out aliens who seek to enter our country illegally. They will probably get a sympathetic ear as some UN bureaucrats believe there should be no such thing as “illegal” immigrants in the first place. For the first time in our history, Americans are being asked to cede the right to decide how we define ourselves as a nation and protect our own borders to a globalist governance body. Will Pelosi lead her liberal loyalists as House Speaker to support the UN against America’s right to control its own borders? Do we really want to risk finding out?
It is high time, as Jim Gilchrist demanded in the press release ignored by the mainstream media, that Pelosi come clean under oath as to her personal stake in the illegal immigration issue before she can do even more damage as House Speaker.
Pelosi - Illegals - Sunkist - Her investments!
Pelosi's corrupt insider passing of bills that make her rich.
Check for yourself
http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/did_nancy_pelosi_get_wage_breaks_and.html
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi's home House District includes San Francisco.
Star-Kist Tuna's headquarters are in San Francisco, Pelosi's home district.
Star-Kist is owned by Del Monte Foods and is a major contributor to Pelosi.
Star-Kist is the major employer in American Samoa employing 75% of the Samoan workforce.
Paul Pelosi, Nancy's husband, owns $17 million dollars of Star-Kist stock.
In January, 2007 when the minimum wage was increased from $5.15 to $7.25, Pelosi had American Samoa exempted from the increase so Del Monte would not have to pay the higher wage. This would make Del Monte products less expensive than their competition's.
Last week when the huge bailout bill was passed, Pelosi added an earmark to the final bill adding $33 million dollars for an "economic development credit in American Samoa".
Pelosi has called the Bush Administration "corrupt".
Check some more for yourself
http://www.snopes.com/politics/pelosi/americansamoa.asp
Conservative Activist Jumps Pelosi's Fence With Illegal Aliens to Prove a Vital Point
Conservative activist Laura Loomer, who is known for going undercover with James O'Keefe, took alleged illegal aliens from Mexico and Guatemala to Speaker Nancy Pelosi's home in California. There, the group jumped the fence and Loomer demanded the group be let into the home. The group set up a pop up tent with the word "morality" on it and hung the pictures of those who were killed by illegal aliens, The Daily Caller reported.
RIDING THE DRAGON: The Bidens' Chinese Secrets (Full Documentary)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRmlcEBAiIs
CHINA’S OLD WHORE SEN. DIANNE FEINSTEIN, AMERICA’S BIGGEST WAR PROFITEER, WAS FIRST TO ENDORSE BIDEN FOR PRESIDENT. WONDER WHY???
As Glenn Bunting of the Los Angeles Times reported in 1997, Feinstein’s husband Richard Blum “has expanded his private business interests in China – to the point that his firm is now a prominent investor inside the communist nation.” In 1995, Dianne Feinstein became a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, “giving her a prominent platform for her efforts to support China’s trade privileges.”
As Ben Weingarten noted in the Federalist in 2018, Feinstein’s husband has “profited handsomely from the greatly expanded China trade she supported.” The senator also “served as a key intermediary between China and the U.S. government, while serving on committees whose work would be of keen interest to the PRC.”
For 20 years, through three election cycles, Feinstein maintained on her staff a Chinese spy who would even attend consular functions for the California Democrat. One wonders what the FBI knew, when they knew it, and what they did about it, if anything.
Other politicians with China business connections include Mitch McConnell and Nancy Pelosi, whose husband has conducted a series of deals in the Communist nation. Recall that Speaker Pelosi kept Eric Swalwell on the House Intelligence Committee even after his “PoonFang” liaisons with a Chinese spy (FEINSTEIN LONG EMPLOYED A CHINESE SPY).
Pelosi also believes in giving sanctuary to illegal aliens. She opposed legislation to deny federal homeland security funding to state and local governments who refuse to share information they learn about an individual's immigration status with Federal immigration authorities. Pelosi’s hometown of San Francisco is one of the sanctuary cities she voted to protect for the benefit of illegal aliens. Pelosi even voted against strengthening our immigration law with regard to the deportability of alien terrorists.
THIS IS WHAT NANCY PELOSI, DIANNE FEINSTEIN AND GAVIN NEWSOM HAVE DONE TO SAN FRANCISCO, MEXIFORNIA
Gavin Newsom has done 'horrific' job in California: Ingraham
THE HOMELAND OF NANCY PELOSI, KAMALA HARRIS, AND WAR PROFITEER SEN. DIANNE FEINSTEIN. WHILE THIS TROIKA OF CORRUPTION GOT RICH OFF ELECTED OFFICE, THIS IS WHAT WAS HAPPENING TO SAN FRANCISCO
Laura Ingraham exposes San Francisco's decline
11 Suspects Sought In $100K Handbag Heist At Palo Alto Louis Vuitton Store
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzIkiCOuQNE
Video shows suspected thieves sprinting out of California Neiman
Marcus with designer handbags
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1ctqHXAcXM
Brazen shoplifting video in San Francisco becomes issue in California recall
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAIcsHh8vso
Brazen, Serial Shoplifter Appears In Court As DA Vows To Crack Down On Retail Thefts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SvvnsvVJrdE
Busting an Organized Shoplifting Ring
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYFvtPM2su4
Vicky Nguyen Gets Inside Look At Retail Theft Rings | TODAY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97x6bLB5RhM
San Francisco locals react to rampant shoplifting, break-ins | Fox News Digital Original
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BU6o2MIuMQc
Target Cuts Store Hours in San Francisco Due to Shoplifting Surge
No comments:
Post a Comment