America Faces No Greater Threat Than Joe Biden and the Democrat Party. Their Assault to Our Borders Is As Great As Their Assault to Free Speech and Free Elections
Wednesday, April 27, 2022
THE BRIBES SUCKING DEMOCRAT PARTY AND THE FBI - The FBI’s past political subterfuge previews what lies ahead of midterms and 2024.
WHERE WAS THE FBI WHEN GAMER LAWYER JOE BIDEN WAS SUCKING THE BRIBES
Joe Biden paid $800k in legal fees for Hunter according to email
I’d be inclined to disagree with Don except for one thing: Biden has proven to be a very adept criminal mastermind. For decades, he has funneled millions of dollars to his children and siblings and, especially, to his debauched, deviant son, Hunter. ANDREA WIDBURG
There it is. That's the issue. To begin, you have the corrupt family Biden. They've been scamming us and our system well for almost fifty years. The man is supposedly worth over 250 million dollars. How is this possible on his salary? It's not. So where did his wealth come from? Not from being a brilliant businessman. DAVID PRENTICE
The critical element required is a pattern of criminal or racketeering activity. This pattern is proved by showing two predicate crimes were committed within ten years. The list of predicate crimes is extensive and includes bribery, embezzlement, fraud, theft, money laundering, and obstruction of justice.
In her investigative reports on “the FBI-concocted Whitmer operation,” January 6, and the fake plot against Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam, the intrepid Julie Kelly has been exposing FBI stagecraft, entrapment and outright election interference. These operations flow from the FBI’s long experience as a political strike force. Consider, for example, their “Shrimpscam” operation in California back in 1988.
“California Capitol shaken by FBI sting,” headlined a September 4, 1988 UPI report. “More than 30 federal agents carrying search warrants conducted an unprecedented raid on the Capitol offices of four leading lawmakers, seeking evidence of wrongdoing until the wee hours of the morning.” As it emerged in the report, the FBI had manufactured the evidence.
Gulf Shrimp Fisheries, which sought to build a food processing plant in West Sacramento to supply California restaurants, was actually a “dummy company set up by the FBI.” The FBI also established Peachstate Capital West Ltd., with an office one block from the California Capitol.
The FBI companies paid nearly $60,000 in campaign contributions, including $11,500 to Assembly Speaker Willie Brown, $10,000 to Assembly Republican leader Pat Nolan, and $10,500 to assemblywoman Gwen Moore, a Los Angeles Democrat.
As the UPI report noted, Moore was the author of “two FBI-spawned bills” designed to benefit the FBI’s dummy companies. The bills “sailed smoothly through both houses with few dissenting votes,” but Republican Gov. George Deukmejian vetoed the fake measures.
On the night of the raid, the FBI searched the offices of Moore, Sen. Joseph Montoya, Republican Assemblyman Frank Hill, and Pat Nolan, a rising Republican star and likely the primary target. According to Capitol Weekly, the outcry from Jackie Speier staffer Richard Steffen was, “The FBI’s here. They’re raiding Pat Nolan’s office.”
Nolan had been critical of Brown, whose office, as UPI clarified, was “not among those searched by the FBI.” The bureau did have one of its undercover agents shove $1,000 in cash under Brown’s office door, about as subtle as Max Bialystock’s (Zero Mostel) bribe of the theatre critic in The Producers.
To the surprise of no one, a Brown aide returned the money. Brown emerged unscathed and Nolan pleaded guilty to a racketeering charge and spent 29 months in federal custody. Here the FBI was deploying a tactic outlined by comic Yakov Smirnoff.
In the 1981 film Fort Apache, the Bronx, police throw a criminal off a roof. In Russia, Smirnoff countered, the KGB throws a guy off roof “to hit the guy they really want.” Nolan was the guy the FBI wanted to hit, while leaving Willie Brown safe to carry on.
As UPI recalled, one month before the August 1988 raid, Willie Brown spurred the Democrats to choose Michael Dukakis by acclamation. He lost to George H.W. Bush, but unlike Dukakis, Willie Brown wasn’t done.
Willie had his eye on UC law grad Kamala Harris, thirty years his junior, and in a daring act of poontrage, Brown set up Harris in lucrative sinecures. Brown also backed Harris for district attorney of San Francisco and state attorney general.
Had the FBI’s 1988 “Shrimpscam” taken down Willie Brown, it’s highly unlikely that Kamala Harris would now be vice president. Beyond informers, fake legislation and such, the FBI was becoming more like the KGB in other ways.
In 1992, the FBI ran an entrapment scheme on rural Idaho resident Randy Weaver, branded a “white separatist.” A gunfight claimed the life of a U.S. marshal and Weaver’s son Sammy, only 14 years old. The FBI then deployed massive military force, helicopters, armored vehicles and such, against a single family.
Army-trained FBI sniper Lon Horiuchi shot Randy’s wife Vicki through the head as she held her infant child. The FBI claims “Weaver’s wife was accidentally shot and killed by an FBI sniper,” but a Fox News documentary dug up another side to the story.
The FBI thought Vicki Weaver was the family leader. Snipers are carefully trained to “acquire” their targets. The chances that the killing of Vicki Weaver was an accident range between slim and none.
Attorney General William Barr rallied former AGs to the defense of Horiuchi. FBI boss Louis Freeh recommended Larry Potts, the agent in charge of the Ruby Ridge operation, for deputy director of the FBI, describing Potts as “the very best the FBI has.”
In 2016, the upper reaches of the FBI deployed the Midyear Exam and Crossfire Hurricane operations against candidate and President Donald Trump. James Comey, Peter Strzok et al suffered no criminal prosecution. While the FBI operates as a political strike force, it fails at its job of protecting America.
“Prevention of terrorist attacks is the FBI’s number-one priority,” proclaimed FBI director Robert Mueller in 2003. Yet the FBI failed to stop Nidal Hasan’s Fort Hood massacre in 2009 (14 dead) and the Tsarnaevs’ terrorist attack on Boston Marathon in 2013 (three dead, more than 250 injured).
In 2015, the FBI failed to prevent terrorists Syeed Farook and Tashfeen Malik from murdering 14 innocents in San Bernardino. The FBI played no role in the takedown of the terrorists, and no bystanders were shot by “accident.”
In 2016, the FBI failed to prevent Omar Mateen from murdering 49 and wounding many others in Orlando, Florida. Before that, the FBI failed to stop al Qaeda terrorists from hijacking airliners and claiming some 3,000 lives in attacks on the Pentagon and World Trade Center on September 11, 2001.
It’s not clear which FBI bosses were demoted or lost their jobs over these deadly failures. A ballpark figure is probably zero. Under Christopher Wray, who denied that the FBI spied on Trump, the FBI regards anyone less than worshipful of the Biden Junta as a domestic terrorist. As it turns, the FBI and DOJ were in the tank for Biden in 2020.
“The FBI and Department of Justice,” Rep. Darrell Issa reveals, “were actually feeding Twitter false information saying there was going to be misinformation about Hunter Biden and a laptop coming out, when in fact, switching gears, for two years they had had the real McCoy and knew they had it.”
With no apology to Robert Mueller, the FBI’s number-one priority is partisan subterfuge.
Look for more of the same as crucial midterms approach.
Millions of Americans will be exercising their rights of free speech, protest, and assembly. Biden’s white coat supremacist Anthony Fauci will attempt to ramp up COVID restrictions. The FBI will doubtless deploy more Whitmer-style operations, hardly the limit of FBI power.
Read Julie Kelly, and mark your calendar. August 21 will mark 30 years since the Ruby Ridge siege. In 2022 and beyond, it’s all about memory against forgetting.
Joe Biden’s Ethics Disclosure Omits $5.1 Million in Tax Filing
President Joe Biden’s ethics disclosure with the Office of Government Ethics (OGE) omits over $5.1 million reported to the IRS.
The OGE filing from 2017 to 2020 indicates Biden’s CelticCapri Corporation collected $8,065,464. But his tax returns filed to the IRS from 2017 to 2019 reveals he reported $13,245,535. It is unknown why Biden reported a difference of $5,180,071 to the IRS and not the OGE.
The discrepancy raises questions about where the nearly $5.2 million might have originated.
In April, Joe Biden claimed he doesn’t “think you should make money while you’re in office.”
However, emails from Hunter’s laptop appeared to show great sums of money were transferred to the Biden family via the scion’s shady overseas business.
The average American wage in 2019 was $51,916.27.
In 2013, the family secured over $1 billion in financing from the state-run Bank of China for private equity firm Hunter co-founded. The family also received millions of dollars in taxpayer loans for real estate development in the Caribbean, and benefitted from $1.5 billion in government contracts while Joe Biden was vice president.
After Biden left office, members of the family profited $4.8 million through 2017 and 2018 from its deal with a Chinese energy company, according to the Washington Post.
Polling shows 60 percent of voters believe Hunter sold “influence and access” to Joe Biden. The poll also found 67 percent believe Joe Biden should be impeached if he “secretly participated and facilitated” in the family’s business.
Al Capone was one of the early 20th century’s most infamous gangsters but that wasn’t why he ended up in Alcatraz. Instead, what the feds finally got him on was tax evasion. In Joe Biden’s case, although the facts are a bit different because the problem isn’t one of tax evasion but one of mysteriously reported taxable income, it does appear that we may finally be getting proof that Joe was deeply involved in Hunter’s overseas dealings and may have been doing influence peddling from the White House.
It was a female Assistant Attorney General who, in the early 1920s, figured out that one way to capture wealthy criminals was to compare their lifestyles with the low incomes declared on their tax returns and then to accuse them of tax evasion. In 1927, in United States v. Sullivan, the Supreme Court put its imprimatur on this tactic, ruling that illegally earned income is subject to taxation.
So it was that, in 1931, Al Capone was formally charged with income tax evasion and, eventually, sentenced to 11 years in prison, plus fines, court costs, and back taxes. Capone, riddled with syphilis and gonorrhea, served only eight years. He was released early because he was suffering from tertiary syphilis. Ironically, the mass production of penicillin in 1942 allowed him to live until 1947 when a stroke and heart failure finally got him.
Fascinating, right? But why does Al Capone matter? Because sometimes it’s a person’s dealings with the IRS that reveal their sins.
In Biden’s case, it appears that he reported all his income to the IRS. The problem, as the Daily Mail discovered, is that the origin of $5.2 million of that income is completely mysterious:
[T]he president’s financial filings reveal that he declared almost $7 million more income on his tax returns than he did on his government transparency reports, an analysis by DailyMail.com of the president’s financial records shows.
Some of that difference can be accounted for with salaries earned by First Lady Jill Biden and other sums not required on his reports – but still leaves $5.2 million earned by Joe’s company and not listed on his transparency reports.
The ‘missing millions’ – combined with emails on Hunter’s abandoned laptop suggesting Joe would have a 10% share in Hunter’s blockbuster deal with the Chinese – raise a troubling question: did Joe Biden receive money from the foreign venture?
It’s very clear that Biden was rolling in dough—so much so that, as some of the documents show, he was able to pay Hunter’s legal bills in 2018, which totaled $737,130.61. Of that gigantic sum, $28,000 was attributed to “restructuring” Hunter’s joint venture with the Bank of China, owned by the Chinese government (aka the Chinese Communist Party).
If that $5.2 million was from pay-to-play schemes, Joe was being very greedy, because he and Jill were raking in the money—although he didn’t want the American people to know just how much it was. Again, from the Daily Mail:
While in office Joe had a relatively modest income, but he enjoyed a flood of millions of dollars soon after he left office, much of which came from his memoir book deal and eye-watering speaking fees.
Between 2017 and 2019 he and First Lady Jill Biden reported $16.5 million in gross income on their federal tax returns, released by the Biden campaign.
The vast majority came from their two companies, CelticCapri Corp and Giacoppa Corp, which they use for speaking and writing engagements.
But in Office of Government Ethics (OGE) fillings for the same period, Joe only reported $9.6 million in income for himself and his wife.
What’s also interesting is that another legal bill that Joe paid—an October 15, 2018, bill for $68,933.41 for a restructuring of another Chinese matter—was addressed to Eric D. Schwerin. If that name rings a bell, it’s because Scherwin was a very frequent White House visitor during Biden’s Veep run. Although reports originally said he’d been there 19 times during that era, new logs reveal another eight visits, all during 2016, when he met with Biden’s Chief of Staff, Steve Ricchetti (now Biden’s White House counselor).
In 2019, Joe Biden stated unequivocally that he knew nothing about his son’s business dealings: “I have never spoken to my son about his overseas business dealings.” That was a lie. He added, “Here’s what I know. Trump should be investigated.” That was also a lie because every colonoscopic financial investigation of Trump has shown him to be clean as a whistle and Durham’s efforts are indicating that he was the victim of an attempted coup in 2016—and Biden surely knew this too.
Warren G. Harding (undeservedly, perhaps), has been recognized as America’s most corrupt president, but my bet is that he’s going to be a piker compared to Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr.
Last week, the New York Post reported that Wikipedia had deleted its page dedicated to Rosemont Seneca Partners, claiming that it was "not notable."
A Wiki editor told the Post that Hunter's firm is mentioned only in relation to its famous founders, Hunter Biden; Christopher Heinz, stepson of John Kerry; and Devon Archer. But "keeping it around" would cause the page to be "a magnet for conspiracy theories about Hunter Biden."
It mentioned the names of the founders and states that Heinz ended his business relationship with the firm in 2014 after Biden and Archer joined the board of Burisma.
The article stated that in 2015, Rosemont Seneca Technology Partners led a $30 million Series A funding round for Metabiota.
The article concluded with a mention of Devon Archer being convicted on securities fraud and conspiracy charges in 2018.
Schweizer's investigation revealed that then–vice president Biden and secretary of state Kerry negotiated sensitive and high-stakes deals with foreign governments while various entities of Rosemont secured a series of exclusive deals, often with those very foreign governments.
Often, those foreign entities gained favorable policy actions from the United States government just as the sons were securing favorable financial deals from those very entities.
Soon after the launch of Rosemont, Hunter Biden and Devon Archer were in China, having secured access to the highest levels of China's largest financial players.
The meeting occurred just hours before then–vice president Biden met with Chinese president Hu in Washington as part of the Nuclear Security Summit.
Another consultancy called the Thornton Group, based in Massachusetts and headed by James Bulger, the nephew of the convicted mobster James "Whitey" Bulger, was also involved with Rosemont.
Schweizer wrote that in December 2013, Hunter joined his father, Vice President Biden, on Air Force Two for an official trip to China.
Here Hunter secured an exclusive deal for Rosemont with Chinese officials. Rosemont Seneca and the Bank of China created a $1-billion investment fund that enjoyed a special status in China. Since the Bank of China is government-owned, its function as a bank blurs into its role as a tool of the government. The deal was inked approximately ten days after their China visit.
For a small firm such as Rosemont Seneca with no track record, this was a miraculous feat; the miracle-makers here were Joe Biden and John Kerry.
To summarize, the Chinese government was literally funding a business that it co-owned along with the sons of two of the U.S.'s most powerful decision-makers.
Last Saturday, the New York Post reported that Eric Schwerin, president of the Rosemont Seneca firm, had an official sit-down with Vice President Biden in 2010. Schwerin is linked to a variety of Hunter's foreign business dealings, past and present. Visitor logs from the White House of former president Obama further cast doubts about Biden's claims that he knew nothing of his son's dealings.
If this isn't a case of corruption and conflict of interest, what is?
Yet Wikipedia didn't deem it necessary to cover any of this information. Instead, it chose to remove the page on Rosemont. The U.S. mainstream media ignored the N.Y. Post exposé, as always.
The same Wikipedia covered the Trump Russia collusion hoax in great detail. If printed, the Trump Russia collusion entry on Wikipedia spans 35 pages. The corporate media were among those who concocted, amplified, and mainstreamed the Trump Russia collusion hoax.
The co-founder of Wikipedia, Larry Sanger, who left the organization more than a decade ago, faulted the website's current leadership for its overwhelming bias and prejudiced editors. Sanger said the site can no longer be trusted and has devolved into propaganda.
This conquest of all sources of information is why the liberals are the drivers of narratives.
People seeking information usually rely on a quick Google search. The first result is usually the Wikipedia entry for that subject, which people consume without question. If not Wikipedia, they look up various news websites. Social media are also a source of information for some.
Liberals have managed to co-opt all these channels of news and information. Those who control the information control minds.
In recent times, especially after President Trump's election, their presentations have been so blatantly biased that their true motivations have been revealed. They no longer even pretend to be fair. This has awakened a significant number of consumers, who now see through the façade.
Information consumers seeking facts must discipline their minds. They must always remind themselves to presume that any information they see in the mainstream media, on Wikipedia, and in social media is false until proven true.
Persistent skepticism is essential to survive in this dense jungle of misinformation.
Joe Biden’s Attorney General Promises to Not Interfere in Hunter Biden Probe
President Biden’s chief law enforcement officer, Attorney General Merrick Garland, promised the Senate Appropriations Committee on Tuesday he will not interfere with the agency’s probe into Hunter Biden’s potential tax fraud, money laundering, and violation of lobbying laws.
Sen. Bill Hagerty (R-TN) asked Garland if he knew of the probe into the president’s son. Garland refused to reveal any internal deliberations against Hunter but noted the investigation is being run by David Weiss, a Trump-appointed U.S. attorney in Wilmington, Delaware.
Weiss, a 20-year federal prosecutor, will have to determine if there is enough evidence to seek a federal grand jury indictment against Hunter Biden in an investigation that may end up including other members of the Biden family, such as Joe Biden’s brother James Biden, and potentially the president himself.
“I’m aware of that, but he reports to you,” Hagerty pressed about the investigation under Weiss.
“He is supervising the investigation and I’m not at liberty to talk about internal Justice Department deliberations, but he is in charge of that investigation,” Garland reiterated.
Garland then promised the Biden administration would not interfere in the investigation. “There will not be interference of any political or improper kind.”
Hagerty continued his line of questioning by asking if Joe Biden ever told Garland that Hunter did not break any laws, including tax fraud, money laundering, and violation of lobbying laws.
“Absolutely not. And the President has not done that. And the President is committed not to interfere, not only in that investigation but any other kind of investigation,” Garland claimed.
Later in the hearing, Garland refused to say whether a special counsel should be placed over the investigation to maintain a just investigation. A special counsel would provide a degree of separation between Biden’s administration and the investigation. Legal experts have said a special counsel is necessary because Joe Biden has denied any wrongdoing by Hunter and may have influenced the ongoing investigation.
“The question of whether they have a special counsel is one that is an internal decision-making within the department, so I don’t want to make any judgments one way or the other,” Garland responded. “But I’m quite comfortable with the United States attorney for that district continuing in the role that he’s [Weiss] playing.”
During the 2020 presidential debate, Joe Biden claimed Hunter’s “laptop from hell” was a Russian plant “and a smear campaign.” Joe Biden has repeatedly claimed he was never involved in the family business.
But according to White House visitor logs obtained by the New York Post on Saturday, Hunter’s corrupt business partner, Eric Schwerin, met with Joe Biden at the White House 19 times between 2009 and 2015. Joe Biden was vice president during this time. The contact between Joe Biden and Schwerin directly contradicts Joe Biden’s repeated claims he was never involved in the family business. The Post’s reporting adds a twelfth instance Joe Biden has been involved in the family’s business scheme.
Meanwhile, 58 percent believe Joe Biden has indeed played a role in his family’s business, according to a Monday poll. Sixty percent say Hunter Biden has sold “influence and access” to Joe Biden. The poll also shows 67 percent believe Joe Biden should be impeached if he “secretly participated and facilitated” in the family’s business.
Text messages from 2019 on Hunter’s “laptop from hell” depict the Biden family payout mechanism. The instrument indicates a collection of 50 percent of familial salaries for 30 years.
“I hope you all can do what I did and pay for everything for this entire family for 30 years,” Hunter texted to his daughter in 2019. “It’s really hard. But don’t worry, unlike Pop [Joe], I won’t make you give me half your salary.”
The Biden’s family payment mechanism of collecting 50 percent of family salaries for 30 years could be legal “predicates” for racketeering charges, according to former Utah U.S. attorney Brett Tolman.
No comments:
Post a Comment