CALIFORNIA - THE DEMOCRAT PARTY DISASTER STATE - GAVIN NEWSOM PROCLAIMS ABORTION FOR ALL AND ANCHOR BABY WELFARE FOR ALL ILLEGALS

NARCOMEXIFORNIA...A Democrat-controlled Sanctuary State and Colony of Mexico

https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2022/04/mexifornia-home-to-mexican-drug-cartels.html 

“Joe Biden is great on immigration. I guess depends on your perspective. If you’re a human trafficker, or drug dealer, you’d give him an A-plus, but theAmerican people would give him an F. The crisis at our border was not only entirely predictable, it was predicted. I predicted that if you campaign all year long on open borders, amnesty, and health care for illegals, you’re going to get more migrants at the border. That’s what’s happened since the election.”                                  SEN. TOM COTTON

 

THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ALONE HANDS $1.3 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR TO ILLEGALS AND THEIR ANCHOR BABIES.

California to Build the Wall — a ‘Firewall’ to Protect Abortion

AP Photo/Marcio Jose Sanchez

JOEL B. POLLAK

3 May 20220

2:51

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) vowed Monday evening to build a “firewall” around California in the form of a state constitutional amendment guaranteeing abortion as a right, after a draft Supreme Court decision reversing Roe v. Wade (1973) leaked.

The decision, in the case of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, concerns a Mississippi law passed in 2018 that bans all abortions abortions after the first 15 weeks into pregnancy. The case was heard by the Court last fall.

At the time, observers believed that the Court was likely to uphold the Mississippi law, based on the comments of justices in oral arguments. Some, however, believed that there were enough votes on the Court to overturn Roe altogether, returning the question of abortion to the states rather than allowing it to continue as a constitutional right implied in the right to privacy.

After the leak of the opinion, supporters of abortion were furious. Gov. Newsom tweeted that he and other Democrats were going to “fight like hell”:

Gov. Newsom later issued the following press statement:

California will not stand idly by as women across America are stripped of their rights and the progress so many have fought for gets erased. We will fight. California is proposing an amendment to enshrine the right to choose in our state constitution so that there is no doubt as to the right to abortion in this state. We know we can’t trust the Supreme Court to protect reproductive rights, so California will build a firewall around this right in our state constitution. Women will remain protected here.

The use of the term “firewall” is ironic, as California steadfastly opposed the efforts of President Donald Trump to build an actual “wall” on the southern border to protect the U.S. from illegal immigration, such as is currently taking place.

In 2016, then-Gov. Jerry Brown joked that if Trump actually won the presidential election — then considered a remote possibility — the state would build a “wall” around itself to protect itself from the rest of the nation, as governed by Trump.

Now, California is attempting to build a legal wall to keep the likely decision of the Supreme Court from affecting abortion.

Joel B. Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News and the host of Breitbart News Sunday on Sirius XM Patriot on Sunday evenings from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. ET (4 p.m. to 7 p.m. PT). He is the author of the recent e-book, Neither Free nor Fair: The 2020 U.S. Presidential Election. His recent book, RED NOVEMBER, tells the story of the 2020 Democratic presidential primary from a conservative perspective. He is a winner of the 2018 Robert Novak Journalism Alumni Fellowship. Follow him on Twitter at @joelpollak.

Kristi Noem to ‘Immediately … Guarantee that Every Unborn Child Has A Right to Life’ if Roe v. Wade Overturned

Joe Raedle/Getty Images

BRECCAN F. THIES

2 May 20220

2:15

South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem (R) said Monday evening that if the infamous Supreme Court case Roe v. Wade is overturned, she would “immediately call for a special session to save lives and guarantee that every unborn child has a right to life in South Dakota.”

Noem’s announcement comes as a preliminary decision by Justice Samuel Alito to overturn Roe v. Wade appears to have been leaked from the Supreme Court.

The decision, if legitimate, expressly overturns Roe as well as Planned Parenthood v. Casey with Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization — a case many on both sides of the debate saw as the most likely chance of overturning the 1973 case that has led to the deaths of millions of American babies.

Noem’s plans are part of what is likely to be a movement among state Republican leaders to end abortion in their states entirely, no longer having to attempt to thread the needle to be within the confines of Roe and Casey.

“The permissibility of abortion, and the limitations upon it, are to be resolved like most important questions in our democracy: by citizens trying to persuade one another and then voting,” the potential decision reads.

“We hold that Roe v. Wade must be overruled,” it continues. “The Constitution makes no reference to abortion, and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision, including the one on which the defenders of Roe and Casey now chiefly rely—the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.”

Abortion advocates are lauding the potential leaker, with some calling this person “brave” for taking an “[unprecedented] step of leaking a draft opinion to warn the country what’s coming.”

Others are much more concerned about the future institutional credibility of the nation’s High Court, saying, “It’s impossible to overstate the earthquake this will cause inside the Court, in terms of the destruction of trust among the Justices and staff. This leak is the gravest, most unforgivable sin.”

Breccan F. Thies is a reporter for Breitbart News. You can follow him on Twitter @BreccanFThies.

Barricades Go Up Around Supreme Court after Leak of Alleged Roe v. Wade Draft Decision

Twitter/@cami_mondeaux

KRISTINA WONG

2 May 20220

1:12

Fence barricades went up around the Supreme Court on Monday evening after a leak of an alleged draft of a decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.

“Right now: Barricades are up around the Supreme Court building, just minutes after reports from Politico were leaked indicating SCOTUS has voted to overturn Roe v. Wade,” tweeted Washington Examiner reporter Cami Mondeaux.

Mondeaux tweeted that she got the alert for the breaking news story as she was passing by the court and that the barricades were going up right then.

She tweeted at 9:10 p.m. ET. Politico published the story at 8:32 p.m. ET.

Another reporter tweeted a photo of the barricades. The reporter, Gabe Fleisher, tweeted that the barricades were set up by the “order of the Supreme Court Marshal” and that two police officers were standing watch as a crowd of about 50 gathered, most sitting quietly with candles.

Fleisher also captured a woman screaming at the court and a man telling her, “You lost babykiller.”

Follow Breitbart News’s Kristina Wong on Twitter or on Facebook. 

Biden Statement: We Need More Pro-Choice Lawmakers to Codify Roe, 'Which I Will Work to Pass and Sign Into Law'

By Susan Jones | May 3, 2022 | 10:09am EDT

 

 

 

Pope Francis meets U.S. President Joe Biden and First lady Jill Biden during an audience at the Apostolic Palace on October 29, 2021 in Vatican City. (Photo by Vatican Media via Vatican Pool/Getty Images)

(CNSNews.com) - President Joe Biden said the apparent leak to Politico of a majority Supreme Court draft opinion overturning Roe v. Wade means "we will need more pro-choice Senators and a pro-choice majority in the House to adopt legislation that codifies Roe, which I will work to pass and sign into law."

Biden's statement was posted on the White House website on Tuesday morning, the day after Politico reported the unprecedented leak of a draft opinion the court has not yet issued.

"We do not know whether this draft is genuine, or whether it reflects the final decision of the Court," Biden said. "With that critical caveat, I want to be clear on three points about the cases before the Supreme Court," the statement continued:

"First, my administration argued strongly before the Court in defense of Roe v. Wade. We said that Roe is based on “a long line of precedent recognizing ‘the Fourteenth Amendment’s concept of personal liberty’… against government interference with intensely personal decisions.” I believe that a woman’s right to choose is fundamental, Roe has been the law of the land for almost fifty years, and basic fairness and the stability of our law demand that it not be overturned.

"Second, shortly after the enactment of Texas law SB 8 and other laws restricting women’s reproductive rights, I directed my Gender Policy Council and White House Counsel’s Office to prepare options for an Administration response to the continued attack on abortion and reproductive rights, under a variety of possible outcomes in the cases pending before the Supreme Court. We will be ready when any ruling is issued.

"Third, if the Court does overturn Roe, it will fall on our nation’s elected officials at all levels of government to protect a woman’s right to choose. And it will fall on voters to elect pro-choice officials this November.  At the federal level, we will need more pro-choice Senators and a pro-choice majority in the House to adopt legislation that codifies Roe, which I will work to pass and sign into law."

Watch Live: Pro-Life, Pro-Abortion Crowds Clash Outside Supreme Court Following Roe Leak

KATHERINE HAMILTON

3 May 20220

2:00

Pro-life and pro-abortion activists gathered outside the Supreme Court on Tuesday morning following a bombshell report which revealed the Court could potentially overrule Roe v. Wade.

On Monday evening, Politico published an alleged decision seemingly written by Justice Samuel Alito and circulated around Court on the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization case. The case revolves around Mississippi’s 15-week abortion ban and is the most significant challenge in decades to the Court’s 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, which declared abortion to be protected by the U.S. Constitution. Someone allegedly leaked the draft to Politico — an action considered by many to be an “original sin for judicial ethics,” and “one of the greatest breaches of security in the history of the Court.”

Pro-life activists, including Progressive Anti-Abortion Uprising (PAAU), gathered at the Supreme Court on Monday night and Tuesday morning, saying they “reacted with cautious optimism to news that a majority of the Supreme Court may strike down Roe and Casey, landmark decisions that legalized abortion in the United States,” the group said in a statement.

Students for Life was also in attendance. The group’s president Kristan Hawkins said that while the validity of the report is not yet fully-known, “ending Roe is the right decision.”

“Ending preborn human life is and has always been a judicial error. The court cannot allow the bullying tactics of the left combined with the threat of chaos cause  by an unprecedented leak to change the right course — the end of Roe,” Hawkins tweeted.

Notably, fence barricades went up around the Supreme Court on Monday evening after a leak of an alleged draft — likely a response to potential backlash from radical pro-abortion protesters.

Katherine Hamilton is a political reporter for Breitbart News. You can follow her on Twitter.

Franklin Graham on Abortion Reversal: ‘If True … an Answer to Many Years of Prayers’

Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

JOEL B. POLLAK

3 May 20220

2:26

Rev. Franklin Graham praised the leaked draft decision of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade on Monday evening, describing it as “an answer to may years of prayers” since the decision declaring abortion a right was made in 1973.

In a Facebook post, Graham wrote: “Praise God! The Supreme Court has voted to overturn Roe v. Wade according Politico, which received a supposedly leaked copy of the opinion draft. I don’t know if this report is true, but if it is, it’s an answer to many years of prayers.”

Graham was commenting on a Politico report that presented a draft opinion in the case of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which concerns a Mississippi law banning abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy.

It is extremely rare for Supreme Court decisions to leak in advance, and court observers were shocked at the breach of decorum, which appeared to be calculated to put public pressure on the justices to change their minds before the decision.

The majority decision draft, written by Justice Samuel Alito, seemed to suggest that the Court would overturn Roe on a 5-4 basis, with Chief Justice John Roberts voting with the liberal minority. Alito not only took on the question of whether the right to abortion could be found in the Constitution even though the text says nothing about it, but also the question of stare decisis, which concerns the degree to which prior decisions of the Court are binding precedent and can rarely be overturned.

Anti-abortion activists, led by religious groups opposed to the practice, have mobilized against Roe for half a century, using both political activism and prayer. President Donald Trump promised to appoint justices who would vote to overturn Roe.

Joel B. Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News and the host of Breitbart News Sunday on Sirius XM Patriot on Sunday evenings from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. ET (4 p.m. to 7 p.m. PT). He is the author of the recent e-book, Neither Free nor Fair: The 2020 U.S. Presidential Election. His recent book, RED NOVEMBER, tells the story of the 2020 Democratic presidential primary from a conservative perspective. He is a winner of the 2018 Robert Novak Journalism Alumni Fellowship. Follow him on Twitter at @joelpollak.