ABORTION KILLS…. the innocent!
PLANNED PARENTHOOD:
America’s baby murdering factories…. Your tax dollars at work
“I Cut the Vocal Cord So The Baby Can't Scream.”
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/03/baby-butcher-dr-leah-torres-in-salt.html
Dr. Leah Torres, an OB/GYN in Salt Lake City, Utah, said that when she performs certain abortions she cuts the vocal cord of the baby so "there's really no opportunity" for the child to scream. She also described herself as a "uterus ripper outer" because she performs hysterectomies.
THE DEMOCRAT PARTY OF ABORTION
https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2021/10/the-democrat-party-of-abortion-terry.html
It is the handmaidens working for Planned Parenthood who have joked about selling aborted baby body parts. And it was Kamala Harris, when she was A.G. of California, who viciously prosecuted the young man who exposed that scandal, after she had received a hefty donation from Planned Parenthood.
Repealing Roe reveals sharp contrast between good and evil
If ever an action did not have an equal and opposite reaction, this Roe decision from the Supreme Court is it.
The Left's reaction to the decision is monumentally top-heavy compared to the action taken by SCOTUS.
Those who are overreacting are deliberately lying about what the Dobbs decision has done. It has not “banned abortion.” Abortions will still be legal in many States. But the reactions on the Left have been those of scalded cats. It is almost as though young people especially have been waiting for another excuse to protest and destroy things. They seem to enjoy doing such things and the Roe decision is handy.
Killing babies in or out of the womb is evil. It is a way for the baby to suffer the consequences of the mother’s (and father's) indiscretion. Would the same mother want to die for the sins of her child? No, not if she is so willing to kill the child in the first place. Even Old Testament law allowed for punishment against anyone harming a pregnant mother if the unborn child was killed.
The “good” here is the general public attitude on the Right toward bearing children. It is positive. It is geared to promoting childbirth whenever possible. Children are blessings.
On one side is the gnashing of teeth, the uninhibited profanity, the shrieking, the obscene gestures and the stripping off of clothing in public (what that has to do with the abortion issue is beyond me). There is the threat of violence, the post-Dobbs retributive intention of expanding abortion to include infanticide (it’s coming), and the seditious threats of elected officials to incite violence and civil disobedience. All of that is evil, almost demonic in its intensity.
On the other side is the good: the desire to protect the life of children from conception onward. On this side is the cherishing of life, the appreciation of God’s gift of children, the protection, love, caring for the helpless and the unborn. On this side is the preference of speaking softly and reasonably against abortion, not to shout and scream, which they find they must now do in order to be heard when being shouted down by Leftists. On the side of the good is the horror of imagining an unborn child being torn to pieces in utero. On the side of the good is God, a God who is unknown on the side of evil.
Perhaps the Right is too good. Perhaps we are too placid, too complacent, only reacting when threatened. That’s how you get dead, physically and culturally. By contrast, Leftists are always advocating for upheaval, violence and chaos; they call it “progressivism”, and without such upheavals, their lives are meaningless. But their lives are meaningless, if meaning is to be found in the killing of babies. Their evil intent coarsens all of life's experiences. By contrast again, we on the Right tend to honor life, tranquility, prosperity, and peace; it is our way of life. We defer to the life and to the good. The Left defer to death and decadence.
An example of this may seem trivial but it is psychologically revealing: Note the differences in the way public spaces are left after demonstrations and rallies. Leftists always leave a mess, the Right cleans up after itself. It is a metaphor for our deep differences.
The Roe decision has further revealed the difference between Left vs. Right, good vs. evil in America. Distinctions were evident before this decision but now we see a deepening gorge with evil on the Left and good on the Right.
Imagine heaven and hell: How different would hell be than living in a world filled with babies being murdered from conception up to birth, racism being taught and called “anti-racism”, businesses, cities, houses being burned and called “blowing off steam”, God's restraining influences on behavior being absent, perversity of all kinds being called good. Hell is the military being neutered, history being destroyed, the economy and supply lines being a disaster, and people being cancelled, censored, doxxed, and persecuted because of their political and religious beliefs.
How different would heaven be than if we were living only with committed conservatives? Imagine never having to fight against false charges of racism, treason, “insurrection”, and “privilege.” Imagine never having your religion punished by governmental agencies and unscrupulous lawyers. Imagine being able to speak your mind without being maligned, sued, cancelled, censored, censured, and punished, and where God is honored and worshipped. Imagine no abortions except for the life of the mother. Imagine no infanticide or partial-birth abortion.
Because we cannot live prosperously and peacefully side by side with such evil because it continuously encroaches on the good, we may be forced to separate ourselves from it in a Benedict Option way. Perhaps the tumultuous results of Dobbs are God’s way of telling us to remove ourselves from the heathens just as the ancient Israelites were told not to associate with others lest they be tainted by the immorality and idolatry.
Lines are being drawn. The differences were stark before but are even clearer since the Roe decision: Death, destruction, lawlessness, chaos and hate on one side with love, protection, decency, honor, faith, self-control, and prosperity on the other side.
I can only hope that those who love abortion will move to the States where it will remain legal. That way, the rest of us may have some tranquility, decency, and prosperity across the board.
Image: Pixabay / Pixabay License
Goldman Sachs, J.P. Morgan Chase, Bank of America, and Citigroup Rush to Fund Abortion Travel
Wall Street has adopted policies to fund travel for abortions for employees that work in states that impose restrictions in anticipation of or following the Supreme Court’s declaration that the constitution is neutral on the subject.
In memoranda to employees, both J.P. Morgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, and Bank of America said they would pay for abortion-related travel for employees in states that restrict abortion. Citigroup announced a similar policy in March.
CNBC reported that the J.P. Morgan memo was dated June 1, around one month after a leaked draft of an opinion overturning Roe v. Wade was published by Politico.
In a question-and-answer web page linked to the June 1 memo, the bank directly addressed whether it was covering abortion, as well as out-of-state travel to have the procedure.
“Will you pay for an employee to travel to another state to seek an abortion if their state won’t allow them to get one?” the bank said.
“Yes. Our health care plans have historically covered travel benefits for certain covered services that would require travel,” JPMorgan said. “Beginning in July, we will expand this benefit to include all covered services that can only be obtained far from your home, which would include legal abortion.”
Citigroup had already been reported to have plans to fund employee travel for abortions.
“While we are still assessing the impact of the Supreme Court decision and are aware that some states may enact new legislation regarding reproductive rights, we will continue to provide benefits that support our colleagues’ family planning choices wherever we are legally permitted to do so,” Sara Wechter of Citigroup said in a memo to employees Friday, Bloomberg reported.
Bloomberg reported that Goldman’s memo said it will extend its “health-care travel reimbursement policies to include all medical procedures, treatments and evaluations, including abortion services and gender-affirming care where a provider is not available in proximity to where our people live.”
Bank of America also told employees it will expand the list of procedures eligible for travel funding to include abortion.
Citigroup, Goldman, and J.P. Morgan are New York based, a state that is not expected to impose any new restrictions on abortion. All three, however, have employees based in many states across America. Bank of America is based in North Carolina and also has employees throughout the U.S.
PHOTOS: Pro-life Americans Celebrate the Overturning of Roe v. Wade After Nearly 50 Years
Pro-life Americans gathered outside the Supreme Court and throughout Washington, D.C., on Friday to celebrate the Court’s decision in the Dobbs case overruling Roe v. Wade and returning the regulation of abortion “to the people and their elected representatives.”
The 5-4 majority opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito states: “Abortion presents a profound moral question. The Constitution does not prohibit the citizens of each State from regulating or prohibiting abortion. Roe and Casey arrogated that authority. We now overrule those decisions and return the authority to the people and their elected representatives.”
Today’s ruling reverses the Supreme Court’s 1973 decision in Roe, thus undoing one of the most divisive and unconstitutional legal opinions in American history.
The Dobbs decision also represents the culmination of nearly 50 years of grassroots activism among a diverse and increasingly young Pro-Life Movement, as seen in the celebrations outside the Court today.
Ashley Oliver / Breitbart NewsCorporate America loves abortion
The moment the Dobbs decision came down, large American corporations acted: They promised their employees what can only be described as “abortion benefits”: They will do everything they can to facilitate abortions for those of their female employees who give their energy and attention to work, not to children. Leftists are delighted but it’s a nasty, debasing thing America’s corporations are doing.
Pandra Selivanov has already noted that Hollywood’s biggest corporations are desperate to keep the abortions rolling: Disney, Netflix, Paramount, Comcast, Warner Brothers., Discovery, and Sony. That Disney is on board is rather ironic considering that its customer base has been, for almost 90 years, children. But I digress.
Libs of TikTok gathered some of the announcements that various corporations have made to their employees. For example, in the name of “equity” and “people’s health, lives, and careers,” Google announced that its “US benefits plan and health insurance cover out-of-state medical procedures that are not available where an employee lives and works.” And of course, Google is “arranging support sessions” for the snowflakes in its employ:
The banking industry is also on board: “JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, Deutsche Bank AG and American Express will pay for employees to travel to another state if needed to obtain a legal abortion....”
To that end, Bank of America sent out an announcement informing its employees that “We are expanding coverage for U.S. healthcare-related travel.”
At the end of this post are a few more examples of corporations rushing to assure female employees that nothing will get in the way of those employees who want to terminate a pregnancy.
Meanwhile, in the states in which abortion will remain legal and that are setting themselves up as abortion destination states, leftists are starting to post messages announcing that they have a couch, a car, vacation days, and a conveniently short memory for any young woman who needs a “job interview” or a “college visit.” Clearly, these leftists envision themselves as the brave souls running a new Underground Railroad. But back to the corporations.
Image: Office buildings by frimufilms.
Corporations are not altruistic. When they treat employees well, it’s because doing so is good for the corporation. Various federal and state employment laws provide a baseline level of decency for corporate work. Anything above that level, while it may flow from the occasional owner’s or manager’s milk of human kindness, usually has to do with (a) keeping employees in a competitive market or (b) avoiding the costs of constant employee turnover.
When it comes to facilitating abortions, the benefits to the corporations are obvious. Pregnant employees are expensive: They take more time off when they’re pregnant, they get maternity leave, sick children mean more time off after pregnancy, and the company’s health insurance costs rise when its employees have kids. It’s much better for a corporation to tell its female employees that it’s right there in the trenches with them in the fight to kill babies.
And what do the women get out of these facilitated abortions? A paycheck, promotions, an “employee of the month” plaque on the wall? It’s true that these things seem wonderful when you’re young, having fun, and getting all sorts of praise and perks from the boss. (It’s amazing how much goodwill a company garners from employees if it gives away electronic gadgets.) And frankly, when kids are little, even a hard job is easier than sleepless nights followed by endless days of dealing with the extraordinary demands young children make on a mother.
The payoff with kids comes later. The energy you put into them as a parent when they’re little is returned with interest when you have children who become interesting, productive, and loving people. When you’re old and your world has contracted, your former employer won’t come and visit with you in the old age home but your children will, bringing the grandkids with them. The thing about kids is that it’s delayed gratification on an epic scale but it comes with a huge reward at the end of the line.
But for corporations, their employees’ children are simply an economic burden. If abortion is illegal in any given state, that employer is going to make darn sure it gets the current benefit of a childless woman now. Years later, when her employer no longer has any use for her, that same woman may find herself facing a very lonely old age.
Here are some more corporate abortion letters: