Thursday, July 21, 2022

WHY DOES FORD EXPLOIT WORKERS? - “We should be getting paid enough to live”


 Chris Hedges | American Republic IS DEAD

“We should be getting paid enough to live”: Ford workers throughout the Midwest support Will Lehman for UAW president

To find out more about Lehman’s campaign, visit WillforUAWpresident.org.

Supporters for Will Lehman’s campaign for UAW president spoke to workers at shift changes throughout the Midwest over the weekend, including at the Chicago Assembly Plant, Dearborn Truck Plant and Michigan Assembly Plant in Wayne, Michigan.

Ford workers expressed their support for Lehman's campaign

Lehman’s campaign has already become popular in Chicago and Dearborn, but Saturday was the first stop at the Ford plant in Wayne, which produces the popular Bronco and Ranger truck. Workers stopped to discuss Lehman’s call for a rank-and-file rebellion against the UAW apparatus.

Last Thursday, one thousand workers at the Ventra parts plant in Evart, Michigan, which makes trim parts for the Bronco and the Ranger, voted for strike action by 98 percent. The UAW has refused to call a strike, instead allowing the company to impose forced overtime seven days a week in grueling heat as a means of stock-piling parts.

To make matters worse, there is an outbreak of COVID-19 in the plant. A member of the Ventra Rank-and-File Committee at the plant reported three confirmed cases to the WSWS within the last week. On top of that, two workers were evacuated on EMS stretchers in just the last few days. One suffered kidney failure from drinking too much water, and the other suffered heat stroke. Still the company, backed by the UAW, refuses to allow heat breaks.

At the massive Ford Rouge complex in Dearborn Michigan, where a new electric vehicle building is nearing completion, Shadaisha said, “The union hasn’t done anything for us. Why not put rank-and-file workers in power?”

At the same shift change, Kwame wanted to know more about Lehman’s stand against war. “I support that,” he said. “We need to unite with workers in other countries to stop the war. We can’t do it just here. The trucks have parts from all over the world. We have to join forces all over too.”

A worker with ten years seniority said, “We need to reinstate pensions. I started here in 2007, got laid off in 2008, came back in 2010 as full-time, but with no pension.” The Obama administration in 2009 restructured the auto industry with the help of the UAW, destroying workers’ pensions and cutting wages in half for new hires.

“Inflation is terrible,” he added. “Gasoline, food, it’s having an effect on everybody. It’s important we have COLA restored too. When I was first hired in, you were guaranteed at least a dollar an hour. Now it’s just $1,500 once a year, which is nothing, especially after taxes.

“I don’t agree with any of the tiers either. It should be a short apprenticeship. The whole ‘in-progression’ is BS. No other trades do that. I’ve talked to people who have been working here two years just to go from temporary to full time.”

A Chicgao Assembly Plant worker said: “I can speak on the inflation. I’ve been working as much as I can, seven days a week, to get out of the hole during COVID. At the same time with the inflation it’s made it even harder to climb out.

“I started at $15 and some change. Now I’m making about $30. The pay was OK, but with the housing market as it is, it’s not enough. I was ready to buy a house, but the housing market… You’re getting squeezed everywhere. They’re taking a third of my check off the top. Even the 401(k) just took a huge hit, so everybody’s getting squeezed. The little bit of money that was gained in the last contract, that’s basically it, but there’s no job security or a pension in the end. So retirement’s seeming to be farther and farther away.”

When asked what he thought was necessary for workers to live comfortably today, he said, “$40 an hour is more fair. I was talking to a coworker who started 12 years ago. He was saying if he doesn’t get $40/hr out of this upcoming contract, he’s looking for employment elsewhere. I think definitely $40 would be closer.

“You shouldn’t have to put in 70 hours a week. When I was a kid, $32 was good money. You could retire on it and buy a house. But that’s nothing now.”

When asked what he thought of Lehman’s campaign demands, he said, “I’m all for Will’s campaign. I think everybody I know would be all for it. He can count on my endorsement.”

A temporary worker at Michigan Assembly in Wayne said, “We need to strike if they don’t pay us more. We can’t live like this, working full time and not being able to pay the bills.

“It costs $1,900 a month just to rent an apartment. That’s ridiculous. I have to put down $4,000. Nobody I know can pay that.

“I’m a mother, so I can only imagine how bad it is for so many people, how nervous they’re getting. It’s to the point where I see people begging for money on the off-ramps, and I think ‘that might be a decent side hustle for me.’ That’s crazy.'

“Some of us have to work in areas where we breathe in chemicals and things like that,” added her friend, who is also a TPT (temporary-part-time) worker. “We know it can’t be good for us. Who knows what it’s doing to us? The least they could do is pay us more than $13 an hour. But it just kind of feels like we’re out here on our own.

“It’s getting to the point where all I can do is pay rent and go to work. Everything else is too expensive, and even rent is getting tough. But I mean we should be getting paid enough to live. We’re not asking for a crazy increase or something. But you can’t really live on $13 an hour.'

His co-worker added, “I’m interested to hear about Will’s campaign. I’m still in my first 90 days, but I don’t really see anybody from the UAW coming around the plant to check on us or anything. I wouldn’t know who our delegates are or anything like that. There’s definitely no discussion from them about fighting better conditions, cost of living, things like that. But I agree that there should be a fight for what we need. If that’s what his campaign is about, I’m interested.

“We definitely don’t get paid enough right now. I think a lot of us feel that way.”

Another worker added, “Will sounds interesting. We deserve COLA increases, safer working conditions. I don’t think there should be tiers either. I know we’re promised better pay and all that, but I haven’t seen anything yet. Rising costs are crazy, can’t keep up with gas and food costs at this rate. I’m not hearing anything from the union yet. I am very glad to hear about Will's campaign.”

To find out more about Lehman’s campaign, visit WillforUAWpresident.org.

Intolerable conditions fuel class struggle in the United States

Around the world, a global wave of strikes and social protests by the working class is underway, from nationwide strikes by rail workers and dockworkers in Europe to mass protests in Sri Lanka, Albania and other countries against spiraling inflation. Whatever the immediate cause of each particular struggle, all of them are centered on the demand that society’s resources be allocated away from the profit interests of the rich and towards the maintenance of human need.

But nowhere is the contrast between a high level of technological and industrial technique, which makes possible the eradication of want, and the reality of social misery as stark as in the United States. The ruling class in the most powerful capitalist country in the world has cut the wages and living standards of workers for decades. In the course of little more than two years since the start of the pandemic, it has succeeded in reducing the country to the level of complete dysfunction. It is now foisting the cost of this crisis of its own making onto the backs of the working class.

The scenes of grinding poverty and industrial slaughter in The Jungle, Upton Sinclair’s muckraking novel about the Chicago meatpacking industry at the turn of the 20th century, read like a straightforward account of daily life in 21st century America. The book, the publication of which launched a scandal in the early 1900s, has lost its ability to shock.

Deadly industrial accidents are a daily occurrence. Last week, dockworker and Nicaraguan immigrant Uriel “Popeye” Matamoros was crushed to death at the Port of Newark when equipment he was operating fell on top of him. According to co-workers, management kept them on the job, making them work around the site of the accident without even having fully cleaned it up. “It smelled awful,” one worker told the WSWS.

Worker pouring molten iron into a mold at Caterpillar’s Mapleton, Illinois, foundry. [Photo by Caterpillar]

The same day, a worker died at an Amazon warehouse in Carteret, New Jersey during the company’s Prime Day promotion, which places tremendous strain on workers to keep pace with orders. Earlier in the year, Steven Dierkes died at a Caterpillar foundry in Illinois when he fell into a crucible filled with molten metal.

Increasingly frequent and intense heat waves, the product of man-made global warming, also take their toll. Two weeks ago, UPS driver Esteban Chavez died of heat stroke while driving his route in nearly 100 degrees Fahrenheit (38 degrees Celsius) weather. UPS delivery trucks are not air conditioned. Workers at auto parts maker Ventra’s facility in Evart, Michigan are passing out on the line and being hospitalized due to extreme heat. This is taking place while an historic heat wave pummels Europe, killing thousands.

As terrible as this is, it pales in comparison to the human toll of coronavirus, which has killed more than 1 million people in the US. Factories, other large workplaces and schools have long been known to be primary centers of COVID outbreaks, yet the federal and local governments have deliberately kept them open for virtually the entire pandemic in the name of the “economy.”

Moreover, despite self-serving media claims, the pandemic is continuing to rage. At the Evart plant, workers report that an outbreak is underway. However, the true toll of COVID on workers is not known because of the systematic coverup of outbreaks in the plants. Often, workers only find out about cases through their co-workers and word of mouth.

As major corporations desperately improvise to maintain supply chains and production, American workers are subjected to arbitrary and punishing scheduling regimes, with the eight-hour day and 40-hour workweek a distant memory. Autoworkers oscillate, often without warning, between 70- and 80-hour workweeks and extended layoffs. On the West Coast docks, thousands of “casuals”—in reality, day laborers—line up at hiring halls each morning for the distant chance of getting work for the day.

Conditions are even worse in the railroad industry, where 100-hour weeks are not uncommon. Workers are on call 24/7, leaving them with no time for their families or even to schedule a doctor’s appointment. One worker told the WSWS that she has so little downtime she has to take sleeping pills to maximize her rest, and then another set of pills to wake herself up in the morning.

On top of everything else, workers are being squeezed by runaway inflation, which last month exceeded 9 percent for the first time in decades. A rise in nominal wages, which has sent chills down the spine of Wall Street, is in reality nowhere close to enough to keep pace. Inflation-adjusted wages have fallen over the past year by 4 to 5 percent.

Meanwhile, the corporate oligarchy that owns the country is making money on a scale never before seen. Through the bipartisan infusion of trillions of dollars in cash, Washington has seen to it that Wall Street has been “made whole” during the pandemic, while millions face destitution.

Even the railroad industry, which is on the verge of total collapse, has been raking in tens of billions of dollars. This critical segment of the country’s infrastructure is used as little more than a piggy bank for Wall Street hedge funds and billionaires such as Warren Buffett and Bill Gates. In 2019, according to research group Comparisun, it was the most profitable industry in the country, with a whopping 50.93 percent profit margin, more than five times the national average.

It is little wonder, then, that the American working class is seething with discontent. There is a growing sentiment that things can no longer go on as they have been going, that things need to fundamentally change. This finds its most overt expression in the growing militancy of workers and support for strike action. Earlier this month, railroaders voted by 99.5 percent to authorize a national strike.

In an earlier period, before most Americans alive today were even born and when the country was still a rising industrial power, the ruling elite was capable of parting with concessions to workers in a bid to diffuse such discontent. No longer. The Biden administration’s entire domestic policy, in one way or another, is aimed at suppressing the class struggle and worsening social conditions even further.

The Federal Reserve, with Biden’s support, is hiking interest rates to avert a “wage-price spiral”—that is, wage rises keeping pace with inflation. Modeling themselves on similar monetary policies from the late 1970s and the early 1980s, which began the era of deindustrialization, they are prepared to trigger a recession by hiking interest rates to ramp up mass unemployment as a weapon against a restive working class.

The Biden White House is also intervening directly to block strike action and prevent the emergence of a mass movement of the working class. Last Friday, while he was on his way to meet with the autocratic ruler of Saudi Arabia, Biden signed an executive order appointing a Presidential Emergency Board (PEB) in the railroad industry, blocking a strike that workers had nearly unanimously voted to approve. This follows his close and unprecedented involvement in contract talks on the West Coast docks, as well as a similar intervention earlier this year in the US refineries. Biden worked with the United Steelworkers to avert a national refinery strike and impose a contract that the union president boasted was “non-inflationary.”

Biden is pursuing a policy known for decades as corporatism, the drawing together of the state, the corporations and the unions against the working class. The unions, controlled by a bureaucracy tied by a thousand threads to management, have enthusiastically embraced this policy. The International Longshore and Warehouse Union has kept dockworkers on the job without a contract, or even a formal extension, for nearly three weeks. It issued an extraordinary joint statement with port operators last month that it had no intention of striking. The railroad unions, meanwhile, had been openly calling on Biden for months to appoint a PEB, effectively demanding government intervention to illegalize a strike of their own members.

But as Leon Trotsky said, the laws of history are more powerful than the bureaucratic apparatus. The attempt to bureaucratically smother the class struggle will not only fail, it will also discredit everyone involved and encourage the development of a rebellion by the rank-and-file against the entire corporatist conspiracy, including the companies, the unions and the government, and both pro-capitalist parties.

There are many signs that such a movement is beginning to develop. The overwhelming rejection by workers of sellout contracts is increasingly becoming a regular feature of public life. In one recent development, Kroger grocery workers flooded the local union’s Facebook page with oppositional comments following the “passage” of a substandard contract, prompting the UFCW to delete its page entirely.

The critical question, however, is the organization and direction of this movement. The proliferation of rank-and-file committees over the past two years, formed in opposition to the treachery of the union bureaucracy, points the way forward.

A critical initiative has also been taken in the election campaign for president of the United Auto Workers by Will Lehman, a worker at Mack Trucks. Lehman’s campaign, based on the abolition, not the reform, of the labor bureaucracy and the establishment of rank-and-file control, is the most conscious expression of the brewing collision between the workers and the pro-corporate trade union officialdom.

Workers are being confronted with the question of society’s basic organization and structure. Who should control society’s wealth, the capitalist ruling class or the workers?

The past two years have shown that not a single social problem is solvable within the framework of the profit motive. In fact, all modern social problems have their origin in the profit motive. But the fight against capitalist exploitation requires the fight by the working class for the socialist reconstruction of society and the abolition of private ownership of social resources.

Silicon Valley Slump: Google Pauses All Hiring for Two Weeks

Google CEO Sundar Pichai speaks during the opening day of a new Berlin office of US internet search giant Google in Berlin on January 22, 2019. (Photo by Tobias SCHWARZ / AFP) (Photo credit should read TOBIAS SCHWARZ/AFP via Getty Images)
TOBIAS SCHWARZ/AFP via Getty Images
2:08

Google has announced a two-week hiring freeze at the company following a recent memo to employees revealing that there would be a slowing of their hiring process for the remainder of the year. The company-wide memo encouraged workers to “be more entrepreneurial” and work with “more hunger.”

TechCrunch reports that Google has announced that the company will be enacting a two-week hiring freeze. The news comes after Google announced last week that it would be slowing down its hiring process for the remainder of the year in order to reevaluate its hiring methods and practices.

Google boss Sundar Pichai is masked up ( Drew Angerer /Getty)

Sabo mocks Google CEO Sundar Pichai

Sabo mocks Google CEO Sundar Pichai (unsavoryagents.com)

Google reportedly hired almost 10,000 people in Q2 alone, with full-quarter results set to be published on July 26. In an email obtained by The Information, Prabhakar Raghavan, senior vice president at Google, said: “We’ll use this time to review our headcount needs and align on a new set of prioritized Staffing Requests for the next three months.”

The hiring freeze will not affect offers that Google has already made but will put a temporary halt on contract extensions. Google’s decision appears to align with an internal memo sent by CEO Sundar Pichai last week in which he stated that the company is looking to be “more entrepreneurial” and reshuffle workers’ priorities to focus on the most important projects at the company.

“As Sundar announced, we are slowing hiring for the rest of the year. In line with that, we’re pausing most new offers for two weeks to enable teams to prioritize their roles and hiring plans for the rest of the year,” a Google spokesperson told TechCrunch via email.

Other tech companies are also slowing their hiring process, with Facebook (now Meta) halting hiring across some of their engineering teams and issuing cutbacks at the company. CEO Mark Zuckerberg wanted employees that soon there would be fewer resources available at the company and they would have to work harder.

Read more at TechCrunch here.

Lucas Nolan is a reporter for Breitbart News covering issues of free speech and online censorship. Follow him on Twitter @LucasNolan

Democrats Use Defense Bill to Accelerate White-Collar Immigration

Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., attends the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol second hearing to present previously unseen material and hear witness testimony in Cannon Building, on Monday, June 13, 2022. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images
13:40

House Democrats — aided by some Republicans — are using the pending 2023 defense bill to subordinate the careers of U.S. professionals to the interests of investors and Fortune 500 executives.

The proposed amendment to the 2023 National Defense Authorization Act would allow “any alien” with a claimed Ph.D. in science to apply for a green card from the Secretary of Homeland Security, a position Alejandro Mayorkas currently holds.

The amendment sets the bar for migrants so low that it provides green cards to an unlimited number of Indian, Chinese, and other foreigners who earn degrees in their home-country universities. Foreigners who get U.S. degrees from a lower-tier “historically Black college or [minority-serving] university” in the United States would also be allowed to get green cards.

The amendment would also expand an existing law that allows U.S. CEOs to hire foreign graduates with dangled promises of green cards. That law is now used by executives to reward roughly 70,000 foreign graduates for taking jobs from U.S. professionals.

The three-cornered amendment would allow government officials to flood the labor market and so suppress salaries for American professionals. It would even make it more difficult for the professionals’ children to get places in good universities.

“This is the kind of [skilled immigration plan], that when reported [by the media] as the supporters are framing it, sounds plausible enough,” said Mark Krikorian, director of the Center for Immigration Studies. But, he added:

There is literally no way that it would be limited. It just cannot happen. Over and over and over again, we’ve seen immigration proposals that sound plausible on their face end up being perverted … There’ll be a guy who has a PhD in economics and [officials will] say, “Well, this is a STEM field, so okay. “And then there’ll be a PhD in home economics, and they’ll say, “Well, okay, you too.” There’s no way they’ll limit it.

The Democrat party is increasingly reliant on votes from white-collar professionals, yet it keeps trying to outsource their jobs to migrants, said Kevin Lynn, founder of U.S. Tech Workers:

What they’re signaling is there is no place for professionals in the Democratic Party … They’re literally voting the professionals out of the party [coalition] and replacing them with [visa workers and] immigrants that can’t vote.

The outsourcing amendment is being pushed by Democrat Reps. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) and Jim Langevin (D-RI), and by Republican Reps. John Curtis (R-UT) and Peter Meijer (R-MI).

Lofgren represents the investors in Silicon Valley who use visa workers to spike the stock value of their companies.

Meijer is an heir of the wealthy Meijer fortune. He is facing a stiff primary challenge this year after already voting for a 2021 plan to massively increase the inflow of cheap blue-collar migrants into jobs held by American residents of rural districts. That cheap-labor policy impoverishes rural districts because the migrants earn little and buy much less in local shops and communities.

The Democrat-run Committee on Rules will decide Tuesday afternoon whether or not to allow the amendment — and other migration-related amendments — to stay in the bill. If they keep the Lofgren measure, it will pressure all Democrats to publicly vote on the House floor against the core economic and civic interests of their professional-class voters.

The committee is chaired by Rep. Jim McGovern (D-MA), and it includes several pro-migration Democrats, such as Rep. Deborah Ross (D-NC), and Rep. Joe Neguse (D-CO).

Ross, for example, has drafted an amendment that would further reward Indian graduates who take outsourced jobs from her home-district American college-graduate voters. The reward would consist of guaranteed, no-cost green cards for their Indian-born children. That government-delivered reward is hugely valuable for Indians, so it serves as a hidden subsidy for the CEOs who cheap Indian graduates for jobs that can be done by American professionals in Ross’ own district. Her giveaway amendment is backed by Rep. Cindy Axne (D-IA). and GOP Rep. Brian Patrick (R-PA).

Another amendment would offer green cards to any Russian with master’s degrees in science and technology. That amendment is being pushed by Rep. Jackie Speier (D-CA), whose district includes part of Silicon Valley.

The GOP minority on the rules committee is led by pro-migration Rep. Tom Cole (R-OK) but also includes Rep. Michael Burgess (R-TX).

The Lofgren-Meijer amendment comes as West Coast investors are lobbying Congress to expand the inflow of foreign graduates for jobs that would otherwise go to U.S. professionals.

One of the leading investors is Eric Schmidt, the former chairman of Google. He is now an investor who wants to maximize his supply of cheap, controllable, skilled labor. In 2013, he helped form the secretive FWD.us lobby group which consists of wealthy West Coast investors, such as Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg.

In 2015, Schmidt called for the government to import more consumers for Google’s advertisers.

In 2020, Schmidt demanded the importation of “Top Tier” talent to help U.S. companies outpace China’s government-aided companies, many of which rely on Chinese-born, U.S.-trained workers. However, the visa-worker programs cited by Schmidt are mostly used by CEOs to displace American professionals with inexperienced, cheap, and controllable foreign graduates from very low-grade Indian universities.

In 2022, Schmidt pushed the claim that an uncapped inflow of foreign graduates is needed for national security jobs, such as cyber-security or for manufacturing computer chips. That plan was added to an anti-China technology bill by Democratic leaders in the House, but it has been rejected by GOP Senators — principally, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and Sen. Todd Young (R-IN) — partly because the Schmidt plan would sideline many professionals in their Midwestern states.

This July, Schmidt is pushing two new claims via the London-based Financial Times.

The first claim is that the foreign scientists will help launch a new industry in the United States:

Eric Schmidt, former CEO of Google, became one of the wealthiest people in the US by specialising in software engineering. Yet, if he was starting out again today, Schmidt says he would not be targeting bits and bytes alone. The 67-year-old thinks the next big thing is the “bioeconomy”, not the internet.

One [problem] is the science has advanced more slowly than many hoped. Another is government regulation. There’s a more fundamental problem too: whereas a couple of teenage computer nerds can build an internet company out of a garage, creating a bioscience business requires lots of expertise, specialised talent, manufacturing-plant capacity and time. These are not things that the US venture capital industry that funded the tech revolution is widely used to handling.

However, there is no shortage of trained U.S. college graduates with Science, Technology, Engineering, or Math (STEM) degrees. A 2021 study by the Census Bureau reported that most work in non-tech jobs:

The vast majority (62%) of college-educated workers who majored in a STEM [science, technology, engineering and math] field were employed in non-STEM fields such as non-STEM management, law, education, social work, accounting or counseling. In addition, 10% of STEM college graduates worked in STEM-related occupations such as health care.

The path to STEM jobs for [American] non-STEM majors was narrow. Only a few STEM-related majors (7%) and non-STEM majors (6%) ultimately ended up in STEM occupations.

“Between 1982 and 2011, American universities awarded 800,000 Ph.D. degrees in science and engineering,” Lynn told Breitbart News, adding:

But there were only 100,000 tenured job openings. This tells you there is a surplus of advanced STEM degree holders in the U.S. As a result, approximately one-in-five STEM Ph.D.s work in non-STEM, non-academic fields. The joblessness rate among STEM Ph.D.s is only going to increase if immigration provisions ensure that anyone with a STEM degree could come to the United States and get pushed to the front of the line

But many U.S. technology graduates are pushed out of jobs by CEOs’ preference for visa workers.

CEOs prefer visa workers because their low salaries maximize stock prices and bonuses. For example, a Brookings study said President Donald Trump’s temporary 2020 curbs on visa workers cut $100 billion from the Fortune 500’s stock value.

But those salary cuts caused by the employment of at least 1.5 million visa workers in the United States radiate into many other professional sectors. “Most college graduates have actually seen their real incomes stagnate or even decline” since 2000, New York Times columnist Paul Krugman wrote in April 2022.

Executives also prefer visa workers because the foreign graduates cannot emulate the ability of U.S. professionals to form their own innovative companies that spur competition in the tech sector. The visa workers cannot even quit — not even complain about work hours or abuse — because they need the CEOs to approve green-card applications. “It’s imperative for policy-makers to understand that foreign STEM PhD holders will not spur innovation,” said a June 9 letter by U.S. Tech Workers. “Instead, they’ll keep innovation within the range of the status quo.”

The executives also use the visa workers to subordinate demands by U.S. professionals that some company revenues be allocated to public priorities, such as basic research, information security, crisis reliability, and compliance with federal laws. Unsurprisingly, companies that subordinate U.S. professionals tend to have more public disasters — for example, IntelBoeingTheranos, and Ernst & Young.

Faced with these congressional rejections, Schmidt and his lobbyists are also dangling the promise of high-tech jobs to skeptical Midwestern Senators. He told the July 6 Financial Times:

“It’s the new industrial age applied to the rural parts of America,” he told me, noting that unlike current tech innovation “these jobs are not in Silicon Valley and they’re not in the north-east… they’re in… the Republican States. They’re in the states with an awful lot of farming.” He hopes that the fact that these rural, agricultural states tend to be red not blue gives his pitch bipartisan appeal, since it will get Republican politicians involved.

But top Democrats aligned with President Joe Biden’s East Coast network openly oppose the displacement of U.S. graduates. For example, Commerce Secretary Gine Raimondo again spoke out fended off the pro-migration push in an interview with NBC’s Chuck Todd., “With respect to immigration, you know, that’s an issue for Congress to take up,” she said on July 10.

Schmidt and his fellow investors prefer to import foreign workers than to hire foreign graduates in their home countries, regardless of the damage to U.S. professionals. In general, U.S. operations are less threatened by technology theft, local rivals, security failures, and government regulations.

Thes white-collar migration amendments are more nails “in the coffin of the professionals in the United States,” said Lynn.

Legislators and corporate lobbyists are “stripping out that bottom rung [in the career ladder] and preventing Americans from having careers in STEM,” he said.

“They know this is going on, but the financial opportunities are just too great to not take advantage,” Lynn said, adding, “they’re not rewarded by market share and productivity — they’re rewarded by earnings per share.”

 

Extraction Migration

Since at least 1990, the D.C. establishment has extracted tens of millions of migrants and visa workers from poor countries to serve as legal or illegal workers, temporary workers, consumers, and renters for various U.S. investors and CEOs.

This federal economic policy of Extraction Migration has skewed the free market in the United States by inflating the labor supply for the benefit of employers.

The inflationary policy hurts ordinary Americans because makes it difficult for them to get marriedadvance in their careersraise families, or buy homes.

Extraction migration has also slowed innovation and shrunk Americans’ productivity, partly because it allows employers to boost stock prices by using cheap stoop labor instead of productivity-boosting technology. Migration undermines employees’ workplace rights, and it widens the regional wealth gaps between the Democrats’ big coastal states and the Republicans’ heartland and southern states. The flood of cheap labor tilts the economy towards low-productivity jobs and has shoved at least ten million American men out of the labor force.

 


The Party of Affluent, Progressive Whites

Back in 2002, Ruy Teixeira and John Judis published a book boldly proclaiming The Emerging Democratic Majority. Demographics were destiny, said the authors.  The coloring of America would transform politics in the Democrats’ favor for a long time. 

In the 20 years since, no such majority has materialized.  Is it stalled or stillborn?  Is the Democrat Party, instead, becoming an incredibly shrinking party lorded over by privileged, progressive whites?  We won’t pretend to read tealeaves or sift data with such glorious insight as Teixeira and Judis. But we can observe what’s happening now.  The Democrats' anticipated emerging majority may be an emerging minority.  Even Teixeira has suspicions.         

The demographic changes that Teixeira and Judis ballyhooed as pivotal to Democrats aren’t producing the desired results. Seems Latinos have their own minds and want to pursue their own interests, even if that leads to them voting for Republicans. Middle- and working-class Americans of all colors are fleeing Democrats, too. That broader trend is more troubling for the Party of Biden.

If enough Latinos defect from Democrats and stay defected, the extreme “progressivism” -- including D.C.-based election rigging, curtailing gun rights, and court packing -- that Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, and Joe Biden have pushed zealously becomes dustbin fodder.      

Erosion of Latino support for Democrats started during the Trump presidency.  Noted the Wall Street Journal, January 12:

Nationwide, Mr. Trump’s share of the Latino vote grew by 8 percentage points compared with 2016, according to Catalist, a Democratic voter-data firm.  

Biden garnered 750,000 fewer Latino votes in 2020 than Hillary Clinton did in 2016, reports WSJ. The Journal offers a why, but we’ll let Teixeira answer.

From Teixeira’s The Liberal Patriot (Substack), July 14:

Recent data indicate that success for the abortion-gun control-January 6th strategy, to the extent it is working (and might work in the future) is attributable to those voters for whom these issues loom large and are less likely to be influenced by current economic problems. Such voters are disproportionately likely to be college-educated whites and it is here that Democrats have been demonstrating unusual strength.  [italics added]     

Other than echo-chamber dwelling affluent, progressive whites, Latinos and working- and middle-class folk don’t give a hoot about the phony January 6 insurrection.  Gun control isn’t a push-button issue, either. Abortion?  Plenty of Latinos identify as Catholic or, increasingly, fundamentalist Christian. Abortion is a grave sin to them. 

People of faith don’t like to go crosswise God, something that better-heeled, secularist (read atheist) whites, consumed with their virtue-signaling and journeys of self-obsession, dismiss as caveman sensibility.  For these heathens, if a baby in the womb is inconvenient, well, kill the child, right up to the moment of birth. That extremism turns off many Latinos.    

Mayra Flores, newly elected congresswoman from a heavily Hispanic, historically Democrat district in South Texas, ran on the theme, “God, family, and country.” That and Flores advancing a practical agenda of protecting jobs, helping small businesses, fighting inflation, producing energy here at home, and, yes, securing the border proved a winning formula. 

Flores daring to strike a patriotic theme raised the hackles of the insular, smug, college-educated whites who run the New York Times. They branded Flores as a “far-right Latina.” Let’s see how that plays off college campuses and outside Democrat-run cities’ and ‘burbs’ very white upscale precincts.   

But the news is actually worse for Democrats.  Working-class voters aren’t just a little disaffected with them. Teixeira reports that “Democrats lose among all working-class voters by 11 points, but carry the college-educated by 23 points. This is less a class gap than a yawning chasm.”

Those college educated are decidedly white and financially better off.     

Via Teixeira, Axios makes this stunning admission, July 13:

Democrats are becoming the party of upscale voters concerned more about issues like gun control and abortion rights.

Republicans are quietly building a multiracial coalition of working-class voters, with inflation as an accelerant.

The Democrats’ chief dilemma is hiding in plain sight.  Most Americans -- pick your color and race -- must wrestle day-to-day with grubby realities like earning livings, keeping jobs, paying bills, paying rents or mortgages, and taking care of kids.  They worry about the high costs of gasoline, home heating and cooling, and groceries.  They don’t hate cops and know that criminals need to be jailed.  They understand that Democrats are hamstringing cops, making their communities less safe. They recoil at lax prosecution by Soros-funded DAs.    

They don’t have the luxury of championing radical isms or pushing boutique issues, like transgenderism and proper pronoun usage.  They’re revolted by teachers who try to sexually indoctrinate their kids rather than stick to teaching reading, writing, and arithmetic, which too many kids are poor at, thanks to low standards and teachers who’d rather social crusade in classrooms.

If the voter trends we’re seeing among minority and working-class people hold, a sea-change in American politics is coming.  The trends are too recent to declare a sea-change, but the 2024 presidential election may prove the decider.  It may be the earthquake that realigns the parties, with Democrats suffering longer-term. 

Electoral debacles in 2022 and 2024 may prove worse for Democrats than Reagan’s 1980 blowout of Jimmy Carter, whose presidency was marked by impotence and serial failures.  Reagan’s landslide was the beginning of the end of Democrat hegemony, which dated back to Franklin Roosevelt. 2024 may hand the GOP greater sustained dominance.       

What do Latinos and blacks get most often from progressive whites? Pandering, and snits from the likes of Joe Biden when he thinks blacks are uppity.   

Remember during the 2020 election when Biden upbraided black podcaster Charlamagne? 

The Guardian, May 22, 2020:

After a campaign aide said Biden had to wrap up the conversation, Charlamagne said: ‘Listen, you’ve got to come see us when you come to New York, VP Biden. It’s a long way until November. We’ve got more questions.’

‘You’ve got more questions?’ Biden replied. ‘Well, I tell you what, if you have a problem figuring out whether you’re for me or Trump, then you ain’t black.’ He said Charlamagne and voters should ‘take a look at my record, man!’  [italics added]   

Biden’s condescending remark wasn’t a one-off.  Biden has a track record that smells a lot like racism. Progressive whites feel entitled to decide who’s black enough and who isn’t. Look at the savaging that Clarence Thomas took for playing a key role in striking down Roe v. Wade.  Racism doesn’t apply when progressive whites attack conservative blacks or Latinos. They make the rules, after all.

Jill Biden’s “breakfast taco” comment to a “Latinx” audience was simply more condescension from a white woman who’s enjoyed great privilege in her adult life. Being labeled “Latinx” is generally resented among Latinos.  It’s a tag that progressive whites imposed.        

The Democrat Party is owned and operated by affluent, progressive whites. Their wealth makes them Oz behind the curtain.  Whatever the pretenses about being for equity and diversity -- when was the last time a prominent rich, progressive white stepped down from his or her high-paying job in favor of a “person of color?” -- whatever the window-dressing afforded by leftist black and Latino politicians and activists, the party belongs to wealthy whites in Silicon Valley, Manhattan, Boston, Seattle, and wherever else these whites hole up. 

Affluent, progressive whites are social inbreds, unable to relate to the struggles of everyday Americans -- even more so minorities.  They’re priming their counterfeit party of color to take a fall of historic proportions.  We can’t predict it, but we surely hope for it. 

J. Robert Smith can be found regularly at Gab @JRobertSmith.  He also blogs at Flyover.   


Surging prices push US workers to the brink

The purchasing power of American workers’ wages suffered another sharp drop last month, as the official inflation rate reached 9.1 percent while pay rises remained suppressed far below that level.

According to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, real wages fell 3.1 percent between June 2021 and June 2022. In the month of June alone, real average weekly earnings declined by 1 percent. More up-to-date figures from the Wall Street Journal put the decline in real wages at 4.4 percent.

The devastating impact of inflation on the working class is demonstrated by the collapse in purchasing power of the federal minimum wage. Frozen at $7.25 an hour since 2009, it stands at its lowest value in 66 years. The 13-year freeze on the minimum wage, enforced by Democratic and Republican administrations alike, is the longest period without a raise since it was established in 1938 during the Roosevelt administration.

By comparison, the real value of the minimum wage in current dollars was $12.12 in 1968.

The surge of inflation is part of a class policy aimed at making workers pay for the criminal and incompetent response of the ruling class to the pandemic, including the vast bailout of the banks and financial institutions to the tune of trillions of dollars. At the same time, while health care and vital public services are being starved for funds the government has lavished vast amounts on the war machine. Military spending under the Democratic Biden administration now stands at record levels.

The result has been that while workers are paying more, consumption is falling. For example, while gas prices have risen 60 percent, the total dollar amount spent on gas has only risen 50 percent, meaning workers are being forced to cut back on travel and commuting.

While the living standards of workers are being devastated, the world’s billionaires have seen a vast increase in their fortunes. The world’s 10 richest billionaires more than doubled their fortunes, from $700 billion to $1.5 trillion. Meanwhile, another 160 million have been forced into poverty, a figure that is sure to increase.

The Biden administration has turned to the unions to help suppress the mounting wave of strikes launched by workers to fight back against the devastating assault on wages. Biden, who calls his administration the most “pro union” in history, sees the labor bureaucracy as a vital instrument for disorganizing and betraying the struggles of workers.

Despite the claims by the US federal Reserve of a “wage price spiral,” pay increases are averaging far less than the rate of inflation. Through March, pay increases for union members increased by 3.5 percent year over year, less than half the official inflation rate. That compares to 4.9 percent for nonunion workers, demonstrating the role of the unions in slashing the living standards of workers.

During that timeframe, the unions betrayed a series of important strikes, including Volvo Trucks, John Deere, Kellogg’s and Nabisco, to name just a few. Wage increases averaged in the 2-4 percent range.

The role of the unions was starkly exposed again by their support last week of the intervention of the Biden administration to block a strike by railroad workers by convening a Presidential Emergency Board. The workers, facing conditions some describe as “hell on earth,” earlier voted by a 99.5 percent margin for strike authorization.

In recent days, the United Auto Workers has blocked struggles at Ventra, an auto parts maker in Evart, Michigan, as well as imposing a sellout deal on low-wage contract workers at GM Subsystems.

Rampaging prices and shortages of fuel, food and other necessities have led to the outbreak of struggles around the world. Mass protests and strikes by workers in Sri Lanka forced the resignation of President Gotabaya Rajapakse, who fled the country. In Britain, railroad workers conducted a series of national strikes last month. However, in each case the unions have sought to limit these struggles to protest actions aimed at merely dissipating the anger of workers.

The suppression of wages by the unions has gone hand in hand with the offloading of increased costs onto the shoulders of workers. A report in the New York Times details how over the past decade families have been “bled dry” by the rise in rent, health insurance premiums, drug costs, student loans, and child care. According to the Times, “Family premiums for employer-based health insurance jumped by 47 percent between 2011 and 2021, and deductibles and out-of-pocket costs shot up by almost 70 percent. The average price for brand-name drugs on Medicare Part D rose by 236 percent between 2009 and 2018. Between 1980 and 2018, the average cost of an undergraduate education rose by 169 percent.”

To further undermine the class struggle, the US Federal Reserve is sharply increasing interest rates to drive up unemployment.  Another 0.75 to 1 percent increase in the key federal interest rate is expected when the Fed governors meet later this month, following a 0.75 percent rise in June.

While the inflationary crisis was triggered by years of bank bailouts and money printing aimed at enriching the financial oligarchy, the ruling class seeks to resolve the crisis it has produced by throwing millions of workers into unemployment as a means to force workers to accept even lower wages.

Higher interest rates will mean higher mortgage costs as well as higher interest payments on credit cards, student debt and car loans. As a result of the rate increases, the sharpest in more than 30 years, a recession is seen as very likely, with millions of workers facing the loss of jobs, their only lifeline.

To counter the policy of the financial oligarchy, the working class must mount a no less determined struggle to defend its social interests. The fundamental principle should be that the working class is not responsible for the present crisis and must not pay for it.

To wage their struggles, workers need organizations independent of the pro-corporate unions and capitalist political parties. With the assistance of the World Socialist Web Site and the Socialist Equality Parties, workers have begun building rank-and-file committees to defend their jobs and living standards. A vast expansion of the International Workers Alliance of Rank-and-File Committees is required.

These committees, uniting ever broader sections of workers, union as well as nonunion, along with retirees, youth and other struggling sections of the population, should fight for substantial increase in real wages and the indexing of all wages and benefits to the rise in the cost of living as well as fully funded health care and pensions. Workers must demand an end to endless hours of overtime and unsafe conditions, including protection from COVID-19 and the right to halt production if conditions are unsafe.

To meet these demands requires seizing the ill-gotten wealth of the world’s billionaires and a fundamental reorientation of social priorities. The capitalist war machine must be dismantled and the funds used to meet pressing social needs such as education and health care, and the eradication of hunger, homelessness and the dire threat posed by climate change.

The banks and other major industries, the oil companies, health care conglomerates, airlines, utilities and basic industries must be placed under public ownership, democratically run by the working class for the interests of society as a whole, not private profit.


75% of Middle Class Americans Say Their Income Is Falling Behind Cost of Living

President Joe Biden speaks about gas prices at the White House on June 22, 2022. Biden called on Congress to temporarily suspend the federal gas tax. (Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
Drew Angerer/Getty Images
1:57

Inflation and a looming recession have left middle-class Americans feeling glum about household finances and the U.S. economy, a survey released Wednesday showed.

Seventy-five percent of Americans with incomes between $30,000 and $100,000 say their income is falling behind inflation, according to a survey by Georgia-based financial services company Primerica. That’s up from 67 percent as recently as March, indicating a dramatic surge in the number of middle-class Americans feeling burdened by inflation.

An even larger share—77 percent—say they expect the economy to enter into a recession by the end of this year. Sixty-one percent of these middle-income Americans say they expect the economy to be worse off a year from now. Just 14 percent say they expect it to be better.

Forty-one percent say that inflation is their top concern. Being able to pay for food is the top concern of 26 percent.

The drag of inflation on the broader economy can be seen in the spending plans of middle-class Americans. Seventy-one percent said they were cutting back on restaurant meals and takeout, up from 57 percent in March. Sixty-nine percent said they are planning on keeping existing technology instead of upgrading in order to save money, up from 44 percent in March. Forty-nine percent said they plan on cutting back on spending  on groceries, up from 37 percent in March

More than one third—38 percent—said they had already delayed a major purchase due to rising interest rates. In June, the Federal Reserve announced a 75 basis point hike in its interest rate target, the biggest since 1994.

Seventy-two percent said that their ability to save for the future was poor or not so good, up from 67 in March.

No comments: