America Faces No Greater Threat Than Joe Biden and the Democrat Party. Their Assault to Our Borders Is As Great As Their Assault to Free Speech and Free Elections
Tuesday, January 31, 2023
JOE BIDEN UPS HIS ORCHESTRATED INVASION OF 'CHEAP' LABOR - Joe Biden to End Title 42 Border Barrier on May 11
Report Two Years of Biden’s Immigration Policies: 10 actions and their impact By Elizabeth Jacobs CIS Report, January 31, 2023 Excerpt: January 21, 2023, marked the half-way point of President Biden’s first term and, after two years, his immigration record has a lot to say. Here is a review of Biden’s 10 most impactful actions with regard to border security, interior enforcement, and immigration benefits since he took office in January 2021.
Commentary Biden’s Dishonest Border Crisis Victory Lap — It Hasn’t Been Fixed! By Mark Krikorian New York Post, January 27, 2023 Excerpt: Joe Biden’s Department of Homeland Security declared victory over the border crisis this week as a result of recent policy changes. They may come to wish they hadn’t.
Biden's Immigration Magic Trick By Todd Bensman Newsweek, January 24, 2023 Excerpt: Under the illusion is this hard fact: the CBP One process does not enforce any of the U.S. immigration laws that actually deter mass migration by detaining and deporting. It does nothing to reduce the historic volume of foreign nationals who are pouring in nonstop.
Yes, Mr. President, It’s a Crisis By Dave Seminara City Journal, January 24, 2023 Excerpt: The Left hasn’t acknowledged it yet, but the migrant crisis is already turning some progressives into realists who understand the costs of unlimited and unregulated immigration.
Featured Posts As I Predicted, Biden’s DHS Is Crowing About Its Illegal Alien Vanishing Act By George Fishman Excerpt: I have to hand it to Biden’s DHS – it is using Biden’s parole rigamarole to boast about its border prowess even though overall “encounters” at the southwest border actually increased in December, and indeed represented the highest number of encounters ever recorded in the month of December. It hadn’t even occurred to me that the Biden administration would have the chutzpah to do that!
Poll Shows American Voters Fed Up with Biden’s Immigration Policies By Andrew R. Arthur Excerpt: The most recent Harvard/Harris poll is a stunning rebuke to Biden’s immigration and border policies and the best proof of the wisdom of the late civil-rights icon, Barbara Jordan, who warned nearly 30 years that, “If we cannot control illegal immigration, we cannot sustain our national interest in legal immigration”. That process has already begun.
NYC Mayor Offers the Wrong Answers to His City’s Migrant Crisis By Andrew R. Arthur Excerpt: If he wants to relieve the migrant pressure on his residents and municipal coffers, the mayor should seek common cause with those on the other side of the border issue, instead of hurling epithets and offering poorly reasoned “solutions” that will just make things worse, for everybody.
Defund the UN Movement Rears Up Again in the Republican-Controlled House By Todd Bensman Excerpt: U.S. Rep. Lance Gooden (R-Texas) and a group of House Republicans have reintroduced a bill that would require the United States to defund United Nations agencies — and recoup past contributions — on grounds that the agencies are financing a historic mass migration event now beginning its third year.
President Joe Biden’s deputies are on track to remove the loopholed Title 42 border barrier on May 11.
In practical terms, the Title 42 barrier is “almost meaningless” because it is being used to delay a declining share of the migrants that Biden’s officials are welcoming, said Mark Krikorian, director of the Center for Immigration Studies.
But the end of Title 42 on May 11 will create a PR crisis for Biden’s deputies — and GOP legislators — who are trying to hide the growing economic damage to voters from the unpopular bipartisan policy of mass migration, he said.
For example, the removal of the Title 42 barrier also removes the legal and political justification for Biden’s much-touted January deal with Mexico, he said.
Under that deal, Mexico’s President agreed to accept up to 30,000 migrants expelled by Title 42 each month. That Mexican cooperation helps Biden’s deputies to pressure many more job-seeking migrants into Biden’s hidden channels that were created to reduce the visible monthly reports about illegal migrant numbers.
Biden’s deputies “are relying on Title 42 expulsions for this ‘Mission Accomplished’ spiking-the-football [media] narrative about a [supposedly reduced inflow of] Cubans, Nicaragua, Haitians, and Venezuelans,” Krikorian said, adding:
Mexico is accepting the [30,000] back through Title 42 expulsions — [so] the [visible monthly] numbers … are going to be lower this month … But if Title 42 ends, then what are they going to do? … What’s the plan here? It seems to me that’s the question that the reporters aren’t asking: “If [the January deal] is some wonderful new enforcement initiative that is solving the border problem, are they [migrants] just all going to start coming again after May 11?”
Those hidden channels include the “parole pipeline” which is being used to import roughly 600,000 wage-cutting, rent-spiking job seekers in 2023. The huge inflow is in addition to roughly one million legal immigrants, and roughly one million temporary workers that compete for jobs against the roughly 3.5 million young Americans who start work each year.
Biden’s deputies prefer to hide the southern flow because “they don’t want to stop the flow,” said Krikorian.
When Title 42 goes, Democrats will need to create a new stick that pushes migrants into the hidden pathways, he said:
The administration won’t have the legal authority to [expel migrants] … unless they just essentially restart Remain in Mexico and call it something different. There’s no provision in the law other than Title 42 for the kind of expulsions that they’re doing. I don’t know what that is going to be.
The impending loss of Title 42 also creates a problem for GOP legislators who want to ignore the pocketbook pain of migration on GOP voters, said Krikorian:
Essentially, what the President is doing is unilaterally increasing the annual level of immigration, and he has no right to do it. Even if the border is more orderly, and more of the people are coming in through this … [quasi-legal] parole pathway, the President is freelancing what amounts to maybe a 50 percent or 75 percent increase in total immigration — on his own, outside the law.
The legalistic argument [against that] isn’t going to sway people who are not super-engaged in public debate — but the effects of that increase is something that might be politically important.
Instead of just complaining about border illegality, he said:
Republicans also need to be talking about the downstream [economic and civic] consequences of letting in all of these [migrant] people … they need to make the case about why immigration should be limited in the first place .. why it’s bad for American employees, and bad for taxpayers.
“The Democrat mayors are helping the Republicans” by talking about the economic costs of migrants, Krikorian said.
“We are doing our job” to pay for the support of migrants, New York City’s Mayor, Eric Adams, said on January 30. But he said, “We need the national government and Congress to do their job.”
“Take the mayors at their word,” Krikorian said.
For the moment, GOP leaders are sticking to the legal argument. For example, 20 GOP-led states have sued to block the parole pipeline — but without mentioning the economic damage to Americans’ jobs and rents.
The elite-directed inflow is delivering many poor workers, consumers, and renters into the U.S. jobs, housing, and schools needed by ordinary Americans.
FronterasDesk.com reported on January 26 about the success of Ilda Vasquez, a Guatemala who used claims of abuse by her husband to split her family and to get her two daughters into U.S. schools:
“He hit me many times, he even wanted to kill me. Here, he made a scar with a knife,” she said in Spanish, pointing to a crescent-shaped mark on [her] nose. She pulled down her face mask to show another deep purple scar where she said he burned her with a cigarette.
She’d hoped to ask for asylum in the U.S. and join her sister in Colorado. But like thousands of others, she was blocked because of Title 42.
But this month, she was able to get an exemption through CBP One [the parole pathway]. I reached her by phone in Colorado … “When the [approval] arrived, it was truly a relief, it was like a window,” she said. “Here I feel safer, because it is difficult for him to come here. In Mexico, we were very, very afraid.”
In Colorado, ‘Rent for Denver apartments increased more than 14% between 2021 and 2022, according to one survey… [and] suburban rents had jumped 25% on average,” the Denver Postreported on January 5.
The federal government has long operated an economic policy of Extraction Migration. This colonialism-like policyextracts vast amounts of human resources fromneedycountries and uses the imported workers, renters, and consumers to grow Wall Street and the economy.
The migrant inflow has successfullyforced down Americans’ wages and alsoboosted rentsandhousing prices. The inflow has also pushed many native-born Americans out of careers in a wide variety of business sectors and contributed to therising death rateof poor Americans.
The population inflow alsoreduces the politicalcloutof native-born Americans, because it allows elites to divorce themselves fromthe needsandinterestsof ordinary Americans.
A 54 percent majority of Americans say Biden is allowing a southern border invasion, according toan August 2022 pollcommissioned by the left-of-center National Public Radio (NPR). The 54 percent “Invasion” majority included 76 percent of Republicans, 46 percent of independents, and even 40 percent of Democrats.
No comments:
Post a Comment