PARASITE GAMER LAWYER OR JUST A TRAITOR WHO SHOULD BE TRIED AND EXECUTED?
Instead, the Biden family name has really stood for only two things: buffoonery and corruption. For fifty years, Joe Biden has managed to hold onto some slice of power in D.C. as a senator, vice president, and Oval Office stooge not because he is renowned for his erudition or virtue but rather because his doltish behavior and venal character make him ideal for others to control. Perhaps no other Washington relic has accomplished so little for the American people over such a prolonged government career or managed to harness those defects for lucrative advancement more successfully than China Joe.
Instead, the Biden family name has really stood for only two things: buffoonery and corruption. For fifty years, Joe Biden has managed to hold onto some slice of power in D.C. as a senator, vice president, and Oval Office stooge not because he is renowned for his erudition or virtue but rather because his doltish behavior and venal character make him ideal for others to control. Perhaps no other Washington relic has accomplished so little for the American people over such a prolonged government career or managed to harness those defects for lucrative advancement more successfully than China Joe.
THE BIDEN KLEPTOCRACY
American people deserve to know what China was up to with Joe Biden, especially when Beijing had already shelled out millions of dollars to Biden family members — including millions in set-asides for “the big guy.” What else is on that infamous Hunter Biden laptop? The conflicted Biden Justice Department cannot be trusted to engage in any meaningful oversight on this issue. We need a special counsel now.
TOM FITTON - JUDICIAL WATCH
American people deserve to know what China was up to with Joe Biden, especially when Beijing had already shelled out millions of dollars to Biden family members — including millions in set-asides for “the big guy.” What else is on that infamous Hunter Biden laptop? The conflicted Biden Justice Department cannot be trusted to engage in any meaningful oversight on this issue. We need a special counsel now.
TOM FITTON - JUDICIAL WATCH
Facing Chemo Shortage, Biden Admin Taps Chinese Company That Made Drugs With Toxic Sludge
Supply chain snafu threatens to derail Biden's pledge to 'end cancer as we know it'
The Biden administration has outsourced production of cancer drugs to a Chinese pharmaceutical giant that was once investigated for using a toxic sludge called gutter oil to make antibiotics.
The Food and Drug Administration announced last week it will purchase the chemotherapy drug cisplatin from China's Qilu Pharmaceutical in a bid to alleviate what one expert called "one of the worst chemotherapy drug shortages in history." Chinese authorities investigated Qilu, one of the country's largest drugmakers, in 2012 for using discarded cooking oil from restaurants to make antibiotics. The FDA has not approved cisplatin for use in the United States but has granted a temporary waiver to combat a chemotherapy supply chain crisis that has caused widespread delays in treatment for lung, cervical, and other cancers.
The supply chain snafu threatens to derail President Joe Biden's pledge to "end cancer as we know it." Congress has appropriated $1.8 billion since then-vice president Biden launched his "Cancer Moonshot" in 2016. The president in 2022 "reignited" the moonshot and this March asked Congress for an additional $2.8 billion in funding. Researchers say a cure for cancer is still far off.
American lawmakers and medical experts have long called for the FDA to investigate foreign suppliers of raw materials for drugs. Investigative journalist Katherine Eban told the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission in 2019 that China remains "a continuing source of adulterated drug products" and that the FDA has "found widespread fraud and manipulation of quality data in Chinese manufacturing plants." Sen. Chuck Grassley (R., Iowa) in 2019 called on the FDA to ramp up its inspections of overseas drug manufacturers that produce materials for American pharmaceuticals. Grassley noted that 80 percent of raw materials used in American drugs come from China and India.
Gutter oil, which is considered highly toxic and contains carcinogens, has been widely used in China's restaurants and food manufacturers for decades as an alternative to more expensive cooking oils. Qilu accepted responsibility for using gutter oil in its drugs but claimed it was unaware of the ingredients used by its suppliers.
The gutter oil scandal was part of a broader pattern of Chinese drugmakers using "cut-rate practices" to manufacture drugs, drug industry trade publication Fierce Pharma said at the time.
Chinese drugmakers have been at the center of several high-profile tainting scandals. Eighty-one Americans died in 2008 after taking the heart drug heparin, which was supplied by a Chinese company that used contaminated raw materials derived from pigs. And in 2018, the FDA recalled the Chinese-made valsartan, a blood pressure drug found to contain carcinogenic materials.
The FDA and Qilu did not respond to requests for comment. But FDA chief Robert Califf said last week, after the Qilu partnership was announced, that the agency will "very carefully assess product quality" and require its partners to "ensure the products are safe for patients."
Published under: Biden Administration , Big Pharma , CCP , China , Drugs , FDA , Feature , Joe Biden
Biden's Energy Department Counts Chinese Solar Industry Rep as Diversity 'Ambassador'
Abigail Hopper's trade association includes Chinese solar companies tied to slave labor
President Joe Biden's Energy Department counts as a diversity "ambassador" the head of a trade group that represents Chinese solar companies, including one that allegedly accepted slave laborers from the communist nation's government.
The Energy Department on its website lists Solar Energy Industries Association president and CEO Abby Hopper as one of its "Equity in Energy" ambassadors. The initiative, hosted under the department's "economic impact and diversity" office, "is designed to expand the inclusion and participation of individuals in underserved communities, such as minorities, women, veterans, and formerly incarcerated persons, in all the programs of the Department of Energy."
Hopper's association, however, includes members that are not exactly known for celebrating minorities. China's top solar companies, including JinkoSolar, are Solar Energy Industries Association members. Consulting firm Horizon Advisory last year identified JinkoSolar as one of many Chinese solar giants that appear to have partnered with the communist nation's government to receive slave laborers in Xinjiang, where more than one million Uyghur Muslims are held in concentration camps. JinkoSolar, in one case, received state subsidies for employing dozens of what the Chinese government called "poor workers in southern Xinjiang," according to the report.
The association has distanced itself from its members' work in Xinjiang by citing its "Solar Industry Forced Labor Prevention Pledge," which calls on signatories to "commit to helping ensure that the solar supply chain is free of forced labor." JinkoSolar signed the pledge by February 2021, despite its Xinjiang subsidiary allegedly using forced labor. Still, the company remains a Solar Energy Industries Association member and is listed on the association's most recent forced labor prevention pledge.
Daniel Turner, founder and executive director of energy advocacy group Power the Future, hammered Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm for Hopper's status as a department ambassador.
"I would assume the main reason why Granholm is okay with that is because it's not her family that's locked in a prison camp making solar panels for 20 hours a day," Turner told the Washington Free Beacon. "Instead, the Biden administration is the beneficiary of it. Whether it's China or cobalt mines in sub-Saharan Africa, they need it for solar and electric vehicles."
The Energy Department did not return a request for comment. Solar Energy Industries Association senior communications director Jen Bristol told the Free Beacon that Hopper's status as a Biden administration ambassador "has absolutely nothing to do" with the group's work for Chinese companies, even though the Energy Department's "Equity in Energy" site says Hopper "oversees all of SEIA's activities." Bristol went on to tout the association's work "in the environmental justice space" to make workplaces "more inclusive" and distance itself from the group's Chinese partners.
"SEIA represents the American solar and storage industry and American companies and workers, full stop," Bristol said. "To suggest otherwise is a gross misrepresentation of SEIA's work." Bristol's statement omits the fact that the association represents the U.S. subsidiaries of China's top solar producers, and those companies are forthcoming about their Chinese status—even on their American websites.
JinkoSolar, for example, boasts of its inclusion on the Forbes 2023 "Top 50 Sustainable Companies in China" list. Another association member, LONGi Solar, lists its revenue in Chinese yuan and notes the company "is named after the former president of Lanzhou University." A third member, Trina Solar, touts its status as "one of the first PV enterprises in China" that "reached a new milestone in 2020 when it was listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange."
In addition to its decision to continue representing Chinese entities operating in Xinjiang, the Solar Energy Industries Association has aggressively lobbied against U.S. tariffs targeting Chinese solar companies that violate American trade rules.
Earlier this month, Hopper scrambled to oppose tariffs on Chinese solar companies operating out of Southeast Asia, a move those companies hoped would allow them to circumvent Obama-era duties levied on China for providing illegal subsidies to its solar industry. While Biden's Commerce Department identified Trina Solar as one of the Chinese companies guilty of illegally circumventing U.S. tariffs, Hopper argued that the Solar Energy Industries Association member should not face penalties, which she said would decimate the American solar market.
"The United States cannot produce enough solar panels and cells to meet demand," Hopper admitted in a statement.
Thankfully for Hopper's association, Biden went on to veto a bipartisan measure to restore tariffs on Trina Solar and other Chinese companies, a decision Hopper said "protects America's clean energy economy." Hopper, however, did not disclose in that comment the association's work advocating on behalf of Trina Solar and other Chinese solar companies.
The Solar Energy Industries Association did not return questions on whether it has considered cutting ties with its Chinese partners. Bristol told the Free Beacon the group has been "crystal clear that forced labor has zero place in the solar supply chain."
"SEIA has been vigorously fighting against forced labor practices in the solar supply chain since reports first surfaced," Bristol said.
Published under: Biden Admin , China , Department of Energy , Solar Energy , Uyghurs
CHINESE DICTATOR FUKU AND HIS RENT BOY RED JOE, CHINA'S WORN OUT S6666LUT (FUKU IS THE ONE WITH THE RED TIE - RENT BOY JOE IS THE ONE GIVING FUKU A HANDJOB).
China Seeks to Criminalize Hong Kong Pro-Democracy Protest Song
Hong Kong’s Beijing-controlled government sought a court injunction Monday against the song “Glory to Hong Kong,” which became the anthem of the massive 2019 pro-democracy movement.
China illegally imposed a tyrannical “national security law” on semi-autonomous Hong Kong in 2020 to crush the movement and is now using that law to ban the protest song as inherently seditious.
The Hong Kong Department of Justice said it applied for a court order against the song on Monday because it supposedly calls for “secession” from Communist China. The filing asserted that the continuing popularity of the short and perky protest song over the dreary Communist anthem “March of the Volunteers” was an “insult” to the regime in Beijing.
The government wants Hong Kong’s High Court to prohibit those with “criminal intent” from “broadcasting, performing, printing, publishing, selling, offering for sale, distributing, disseminating, displaying or reproducing in any way” the forbidden song.
China’s state-run Global Times quoted “Chinese experts” who hyperventilated about the urgent need to defend Beijing’s honor by obliterating “Glory to Hong Kong,” or else foreigners might keep using it as the Chinese national anthem:
“The HKSAR [Hong Kong Special Administrative Region] government now has conveyed a clear message, any distribution or promulgation of the song will be a criminal offense. This is an essential act to restore and secure the dignity of the National Anthem,” Chu Kar-kin, a veteran current affairs commentator based in Hong Kong and a member of the Chinese Association of Hong Kong and Macao Studies, told the Global Times on Tuesday.
Anyone who deliberately facilitates the wrongful act is now liable. Representatives from Hong Kong who participate in those events should be cautious to prevent embarrassment and liability, Chu said.
The purpose of the HKSAR government applying for the injunction is to restrain anyone from disseminating or performing the song, with the intention of inciting others to commit secession, or with a seditious intent, the HKSAR government said.
The requested court order would prohibit any playing of “Glory to Hong Kong” that might be “mistaken as the national anthem” or suggest Hong Kong is “an independent state and has a national anthem of her own.”
The Hong Kong filing included 32 versions of the song in various languages and demanded all of them be criminalized, along with every other version anyone ever creates, and also demanded criminal penalties for “helping or knowingly allowing others” to spread the tune.
The lyrics of “Glory to Hong Kong” urge the people of the region to resist becoming “slaves” and fight with “valor and wisdom” to defend their freedom.
A line from the song “Revolution of Our Times” became the slogan of the 2019 democracy uprising.
The Hong Kong government outlawed that slogan in June 2020, but democracy activists found clever ways to keep using it, including simply waving blank sheets of paper and inviting observers to imagine “Revolution of Our Times” was written there — a tactic later embraced by the anti-lockdown protests of November 2022 in China.
Watch — China: Hundreds Protest Communist Censorship by Holding Up Papers Saying…Nothing
During the 2019 protests, crowds gathered to sing “Glory to Hong Kong,” often while raising their hands with five fingers outstretched — a protest salute that evoked the “Five Demands” made by the movement.
Beijing’s puppet government in Hong Kong began trying to quash the song as soon as the “national security law” was in place. A young street musician named Oliver Ma was arrested in May 2021 for merely adding the popular song to his rotation during a non-political performance, as he had been doing for months beforehand.
The police claimed they arrested the busker for causing “disorder in a public place.” Later, they tried charging Ma with violating coronavirus social distancing rules but then gave up on persecuting him, as he was acquitted in May 2023.
“Would I be performing the song again? At this time, probably not. But it was really nice to have had a chance to sing it,” Ma said upon his acquittal, neatly demonstrating how quasi-legal tyranny works.
The Hong Kong Free Press (HKFP) on Wednesday suggested the fruitless prosecution of Ma, and another recently flubbed court case against someone who played “Glory to Hong Kong” as the national anthem at a sporting event, were major reasons why the Hong Kong government decided to seek a total censorship injunction against the song.
In November 2022, the Hong Kong government furiously demanded an apology when a South Korean rugby tournament played “Glory to Hong Kong” instead of the Chinese national anthem. One of Beijing’s stooges in the Hong Kong legislature, Junius Ho, demanded the dissolution of the entire rugby team because the players stood quietly while the anthem was played. Hong Kong police investigated the incident as an act of espionage, even though the tournament organizers said playing the protest song was a simple mistake.
The Hong Kong government pressured Google in December 2022 to manipulate search results to hide “Glory to Hong Kong” after it was played at another sporting event. Hong Kong officials furiously denounced Google for refusing the demand.
Chinese officials often claim “Glory to Hong Kong” keeps getting played at foreign events as the Chinese national anthem because it comes up in search results first. Google noted that might be because Internet users not trapped in the fetid backwater of China’s heavily-censored Internet tend to search for the famous protest anthem more often than they look for the plodding “March of the Volunteers.”
In a detail that will be depressingly familiar to free speech defenders around the world, the Hong Kong puppet government claimed it fully “respects and values the rights and freedoms protected by the Basic Law” — the rights, including free speech, supposedly guaranteed for Hong Kongers after the United Kingdom handed control of the region over to Communist China in 1997 — but added that “free speech is not absolute.”
In other words, the people of Hong Kong are completely free to say anything that does not anger the thin-skinned Communist despots that now run the region. In theory, according to the court filing, they would even be allowed to play “Glory to Hong Kong” in a non-seditious way — but, of course, every performance of the song will be instantly declared seditious and prosecuted.
Flashback — Free Hong Kong Activist: China Wants to “Silence and Suppress,” “Buy Off” to Gain Appearance of Legitimacy
Disney Reverses Course and Agrees To Meet With Uyghur Genocide Victims
About-face follows Free Beacon report that Disney executives reneged on offer to meet Uyghur groups
Disney executives have agreed to meet with Uyghur genocide victims after the Washington Free Beacon revealed the company had reneged on a planned powwow to discuss Disney's friendly relationship with Beijing.
The House of Mouse informed Rep. Jim Banks (R., Ind.) earlier this month that it "will be reaching out to the Uyghur Human Rights Project and the Uyghur American Association directly to arrange a meeting with our appropriate executives," according to a letter sent to the lawmaker and obtained by the Free Beacon.
Banks petitioned the company in May to explain why it allegedly pulled out of a meeting with a group of Uyghurs, their families, and advocates who were concerned with Disney's friendly relationship with China and decision to shoot a film in the province where the Chinese Communist Party is oppressing the country's Muslim minority. Disney officials, Banks disclosed in his initial letter, "suddenly cut off the correspondence" with the advocacy groups and have since "evaded meeting with victims of the Uyghur genocide."
Disney's about-face comes as Congress investigates American companies' work with China. Banks and other lawmakers on the House Select Committee on China are conducting broad investigations into a range of companies, such as Nike and Adidas, that rely on Uyghur slave labor and enable China's genocide. Disney has also been locked in an ongoing battle with Republican Florida governor Ron DeSantis, a 2024 presidential candidate.
Banks told the Free Beacon he is encouraged by Disney’s response, but he said that "we will see if it's a turning point" for the company as it tries to battle the perception it kowtows to China.
"Disney did the right thing here," Banks said, expressing hope that the meeting with Uyghur advocacy groups helps drive "a wedge between Disney and the Chinese Communist Party."
Disney faced criticism for its decision to film the 2020 live-action Mulan remake in China's Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, where the CCP wages a genocide against the Uyghur Muslim ethnic minority.
The Mulan film sparked a public relations nightmare for Disney after viewers noticed that the film's credits "thanked several Chinese government agencies," including the Public Security Bureau of Turpan, which the Trump administration sanctioned for human rights crimes. Disney also thanked the Publicity Department of CPC Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region Committee, "the CCP propaganda arm charged with covering up the abuses," according to Banks's initial letter.
Susan Fox, Disney's senior vice president and head of U.S. government relations, says that the Mulan debacle was a wake-up call for the company.
"We have subsequently increased our due diligence processes around location filming and acknowledgements in film credits," Fox wrote to Banks, "and we have no future plans to film in Xinjiang Province."
These updated guidelines will apply to all future projects filmed in China, the company said.
Disney also claimed that it could not find evidence that it pulled out of any meetings with Uyghur advocates, even though Banks and his colleagues were provided with insider information about the matter.
"Given the size of our company and the number of requests we receive for meetings with representatives of outside organizations, identifying whether or not a particular meeting request was made several years ago is challenging," the company wrote.
Some of the advocates seeking an audience with Disney remain skeptical that the company will change how it deals with China.
"It's hard to see how Disney can make this right," said Uyghur Human Rights Project executive director Omer Kanat, "but they certainly need to try."
Published under: Beijing , CCP , China , Disney , Genocide , Jim Banks , Uyghurs , Xinjiang
Thousands of Chinese spy balloons are hovering over American universities
By George Fishman
Washington Examiner,
Excerpt: With Biden taking focused law enforcement off the table, we need at least to consider barring the entry of all students from the PRC, or at least those studying in STEM and other fields with military applications. While not every such student will engage in espionage while on our campuses, a sufficiently large number will that a blanket ban may be the only effective option.
Ingraham: Everything is ‘falling’ under Biden
Schweizer said, “Biden’s lawyer claims that his client did resign, and has produced a document from Hunter’s China-based company saying as much. Maybe. But Hunter’s attorney did not address the more important problem – the fact that Hunter still owns a piece of the Chinese company, called BHR.”
“[BHR] is an investment vehicle, financed by the government of China, which has conducted at least two-point-five billion dollars worth of deals,” added Schweizer, “and Hunter Biden has a ten percent equity piece of that.”
There’s more evidence that Hunter might have been selling state secrets
Late last night, Miranda Devine wrote an essay that’s ostensibly about a poll showing that Americans think that Biden was wrong to brush off the news about his squirreling classified documents as “nothing.” In fact, most Americans, including Democrats, think what happened is “something.” But buried in Devine’s article was well-grounded speculation more interesting than poll results: She believes there’s inferential evidence that Hunter Biden was openly selling national security information to foreign governments and corporations.
Devine opens her article, “Majority of voters, including Democrats, believe Biden’s mishandling of classified documents is a scandal,” by discussing a Rasmussen poll asking voters whether they believe that the way in which Biden handled classified documents is a “scandal.” As you may recall, Biden’s only take on the increasing number of classified document finds was that “there’s no there there” and that “there’s nothing there.”
Au contraire said the voters that Rasmussen polled. Those poll results show that 72% of voters, including 55% of Democrat voters, think that Biden’s conduct constitutes a “scandal.” Indeed, 48% believe that it’s a “major scandal.”
Hunter Biden turns out to be part of what voters consider so scandalous. Of those polled, 60% believe that Hunter used classified documents in his business deals.
Image: Hunter Biden. YouTube screen grab.
So, did he? It’s entirely possible that Hunter did indeed borrow information from Daddy to get money from foreign businesses.
Devine has already speculated, based on her intimate knowledge of Hunter’s laptop, that one of Hunter’s emails is so unlike his usual style—polished, comprehensive, and informed versus semi-literate and with minimal information—that it’s probable he copied it right off a classified briefing. What I can throw into the mix is that the language from that particular email, when run through Grammarly’s plagiarism checker, does not return any other document on the internet, suggesting that Hunter was copying a document that never saw the light of day.
It turns out, though, that you don’t just need to speculate about Hunter’s sudden high-level research and linguistic skills to be suspicious. Hunter was openly offering foreign oligarchs information that promised was unavailable elsewhere. Writes Devine:
The classified files Hur is investigating cover Biden’s vice presidential years, when Hunter and his uncle Jim Biden were actively monetizing the family name overseas. Some documents reportedly date back to the president’s time in the Senate.
[snip]
For instance, documents on the laptop from 2011 show that Hunter offered to sell intelligence on Russian oligarchs to the US aluminum firm Alcoa Inc. for $55,000.
In internal discussions over Hunter’s proposal, a senior executive at Alcoa suggested the information was valuable because it “would not otherwise be on Government Affairs team’s radar.”
As I previously reported, Hunter offered to “provide Alcoa with statistical analysis of political and corporate risks, elite networks associated with Oleg Deripaska (OD), Russian CEO of Basic Element company and United company RUSAL.”
Alcoa had just signed a metal supply agreement with RUSAL.
Hunter promised to provide a “list of elites of similar rank in Russia, map of OD’s [Deripaska’s] networks based on frequency of interaction with selected elites and countries.”
Devine has even more information about pricy offers Hunter was making to Russian oligarchs, promising to give them “raw data” from an “elite mapping procedure.” As Devine says, “How Hunter, 52, a raging drug addict with a voracious appetite for cash during much of his father’s vice presidency, got access to classified information is a matter of national concern.”
It’s not necessarily beneficial if Biden gets impeached because that allows Democrats to put their chosen 2024 candidate in the White House, first as Kamala’s Veep and then, when she’s driven out, as President. There is a real incumbent advantage. With the media rhapsodizing about the chosen one, there’s a strong likelihood that a credulous public, with help from a gamed election, will keep that Democrat in the White House. Better a lame duck Biden than an ascendent Michelle or Gavin Newsom.
Ultimately, though, assuming a clean 2024 election, it would be a wonderful thing if Biden and his son Hunter were definitively proven (at an honestly conducted trial, of course) to have engaged in criminal conduct and were then sent for a long stay in one of the less nice federal prisons.
Biden Diplomats Travel to Beijing To 'Thaw Relations' as CCP Cracks Down on Tiananmen Anniversary Protests
WASHINGTON/BEIJING (Reuters) — A senior U.S. State Department official arrived in Beijing on Sunday with meetings planned for the coming week as Washington seeks to boost communication with China at a time of tense relations between the two countries.
Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Daniel Kritenbrink will discuss "key issues in the bilateral relationship" during his visit to China, the State Department said in a statement on Saturday.
He will be joined by the White House National Security Council's senior director for China and Taiwan affairs, Sarah Beran, the statement said.
The officials arrived on the anniversary of China's 1989 massacre of pro-democracy protesters in Tiananmen Square. One day earlier, protesters in Hong Kong took to the streets in commemoration of the massacre, with the government arresting 32 people, the Associated Press reported. The trip is part of the Biden administration's "attempt to thaw relations" with China, CBS reported.
Ties between the world's two largest economies are strained over issues ranging from Taiwan and China's human rights record to military activity in the South China Sea.
During his travels through June 10, Kritenbrink will also visit New Zealand to participate in the U.S.-New Zealand Strategic Dialogue, the department said.
Kritenbrink's official meetings will begin on Monday, a State Department spokesperson said.
While in Beijing, Kritenbrink will raise human rights in his meetings as always, and continue to advocate for people's fundamental freedoms in China, the spokesperson said.
The U.S. embassy in Beijing did not immediately respond to a request for further details on Kritenbrink's itinerary.
Kritenbrink's arrival coincides with the anniversary of the 1989 crackdown by Chinese troops on demonstrators in and around Beijing's Tiananmen Square that rights groups say killed hundreds, if not thousands, of protesters.
Secretary of State Antony Blinken issued a statement on Saturday marking the anniversary of the crackdown, saying, "The victims' bravery will not be forgotten and continues to inspire advocates for these principles around the world."
Discussion of the Tiananmen Square crackdown is taboo in China and heavily censored on social media.
Kritenbrink's trip follows a visit last month to China by CIA director William Burns. A U.S. official said Burns had "emphasized the importance of maintaining open lines of communication in intelligence channels" in meetings with his Chinese counterparts.
In contrast, U.S. defense secretary Lloyd Austin rebuked China on Saturday for refusing to hold military talks.
Speaking at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, Asia's top security summit, Austin said Beijing's reluctance to talk undermined efforts to maintain peace in a region where the two rivals are increasing their military firepower.
Blinken postponed a planned February trip to China after an alleged Chinese spy balloon flew through U.S. airspace over sensitive military sites, kicking off a diplomatic crisis.
But the White House has said further efforts were being made to facilitate visits by Blinken, as well as Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo.
(Reporting by Eric Beech; Additional reporting by Michael Martina and Laurie Chen; Editing by Cynthia Osterman, Don Durfee, and William Mallard.)
Published under: Antony Blinken , Biden Administration , China , Protests , State Department , Tiananmen Square
Horowitz Video: The Moral Depravity of the Democrat Party
Freedom Center founder condemns Democrat treason.
[Order your copy of David’s new best-seller, Final Battle: HERE!]
Freedom Center founder David Horowitz recently spoke at The Brown Palace in Denver, Colorado on May 2, 2023 about the moral depravity of the Democrat Party — including the Marxist takeover of our schools, the corruption of the 2020 election, and much more.
Don’t miss this inspiring speech below — but first, read David’s personal letter to all FrontPage Mag readers:
Dear FrontPage Reader,
My new book has been a runaway bestseller.
But it’s being censored.
Almost a total ban.
Even though my book sales far, far surpassed other bestsellers — The New York Times won’t include me on their bestseller list.
All the major networks — including Fox News — won’t even mention “Final Battle: The Next Election Could Be the Last.”
Frankly, I was stunned by Fox’s reaction.
That was until Tucker Carlson was fired.
You should know my book reveals the Left’s end game: creating a one-party, authoritarian socialist state in this country.
Soon after Tucker was fired, he released a video saying a “one-party state” had arrived.
As I discuss in “Final Battle” — the left believes conservative and dissenting voices must be shut down.
Consider that Tucker was the #1 cable news host in America.
And he was shut down.
Consider President Trump was “president” and the leader of the Republican Party today.
And he has been shut down by major media.
I was told President Trump was shocked when he first read “Final Battle.”
A friend told me that he said this book “explains it all.”
I was grateful for President Trump’s strong endorsement for “Final Battle.”
He even posted an urgent message to Truth Social, telling Americans everywhere “Get David Horowitz’s book ‘Final Battle’.”
Dennis Prager, one of the nation’s leading conservative thinkers who heads PragerU, said he agrees with Trump, writing:
“‘Final Battle’ may be the most devastating book-length indictment of the Democratic Party yet written.
This is nothing less than a handbook for the salvation of the United States of America.”
All the major media — even Fox News — is banning any mention of “Final Battle” as it soars to the top of the bestseller lists . . .
To order a copy today, please CLICK HERE ……………….. Thank you for all of your support!
Sincerely,
David Horowitz
David Horowitz – “The Moral Depravity of the Democrat Party” from DHFC on Vimeo.
Transcript below:
Thank you all for coming.
About this time twenty years ago I was sitting in the dining room at this very hotel, meeting with the Republican leadership of the state legislature headed by my friend John Andrews who would have been here tonight except that it’s his birthday and he had a prior engagement with his family.
In those days Colorado was still a red state. Bill Owens whom I had already met with was governor and John was leader of the Senate. Chairing the meeting was my dear friend Steve Schuck who is here with us tonight.
Steve is the most generous and dedicated man I know. Over the past twenty and more years he has been a great friend and supporter of mine and of the Freedom Center, and of this event.
I also want to thank Shari Williams head of the Leadership Program of the Rockies, who couldn’t be here herself but encouraged her members to come.
The title of my new book – Final Battle: The Next Election Could be the Last – may seem like hyperventilation, but in fact it is a sober and disturbing portrait of where we are as a nation. Which is why Donald Trump has not only endorsed my book but has used its title Final Battle to describe his presidential campaign. It is also why for four straight months it has been the #1 best-selling book on elections and politics on Amazon.
“Woke” has become a term to describe the enemies of our country who have colonized our schools and taught our next generations to hate America, hate white people and trash our history and national pride. How to explain this travesty? It began fifty years ago when the anti-American, Marxist left set its sights on taking over our schools.
In fact the purpose of my meeting at the Brown Palace twenty years ago was to launch a national campaign for an Academic Bill of Rights that would protect students from indoctrination by these leftwing ideologues who were busy transforming our schools into indoctrination and recruitment centers for Marxist causes and the Democrat Party. The key agenda of my Academic Bill of Rights was that students should be presented in a fair and dispassionate manner with both sides of controversial questions, and should be assigned readings representing both sides as well.
Knowing that the previous decades had witnessed a large-scale purge of conservatives from university faculties, the very first principle of my Academic Bill of Rights was that no faculty member could be hired, fired, promoted or demoted for their political views. The next day the Denver Post’s lead editorial was an attack on me and my proposal warning that a conservative right-winger from California had come to Colorado for the purpose of getting liberal teachers fired. The Brazen Lie culture of the left was already firmly entrenched …. And very effective at intimidating conservatives and Republicans.
Many of you may have thought that the takeover of our educational system by anti-American Marxists happened overnight. It didn’t. It was five decades in the making. But conservatives and Republicans chose not to notice it. And when they did notice it, they were reluctant to fight.
If you want to understand the disasters that have befallen our country, you have to begin with the failure of Republicans and conservatives to aggressively wage the political war necessary to defend it.
The anti-American left attacks patriotic Americans as “white supremacists,” “racists” “domestic terrorists” and “insurrectionists.” And we respond by calling them “liberals.” There is nothing about them that is liberal. They are vindictive bigots, determined to demonize and destroy us.
Their intimidation has been working like a charm. While Senator Andrews was able to get Republicans to support the principles of my Academic Bill of Rights they were only prepared to support a “Resolution” not a law. So it lacked any teeth to enforce it. The Democrats were happy with this result, and John was able to put together a Joint Resolution supported by both parties which passed both Colorado chambers unanimously.
But the cynical Democrats, as usual, were acting in bad faith, and nothing happened as a result. The Democrats had achieved their goal of supporting the transformation of the educational system into an indoctrination and recruitment Center for the anti-American political left.
I wrote 5 books documenting the Marxist takeover of the schools They sold about 100,000 copies and I had high level contacts with Republican leaders like Newt Gingrich and Speaker John Boehner. I also created a national organization called Students for Academic Freedom. However, nothing came of our efforts but toothless resolutions like the one in Colorado.
Boehner even inserted a Resolution endorsing the Academic Bill of Rights into the Education Authorization Act, which meant that federal funds would be withdrawn from any institution that didn’t implement its principles. That’s if it was formulated as a law. But it wasn’t.
The result of these failures was the destruction of our educational system and the atrocities committed against our youth today from gender transitioning behind parental backs to teaching that America was created in 1619 as a white supremacist slave state.
The Democrat Party is no longer controlled by a liberal left but by Marxist zealots who willfully disregard the Marxist atrocities and failures of the past. Democrats no longer respect the sovereign individual, the rule of law, or the primary values of the Constitution –the equality of races, the spirit of compromise or the decentralization of power.
Instead, Democrats regard the Constitution as a white supremacist document written by rich white slaveowners, designed to oppress all other genders and races. Its mentality is that of European fascism and Soviet communism, and its immediate goal is a one-party state.
This is actually a bad news/good news story. The bad news is that the tremendous damage to our country was made possible because Republicans and patriots failed to address the threat when it could have been nipped in the bud. The good news is that we can take our country back if we’re willing to fight now.
2. The 2020 Election
I came tonight ready to talk about some of the themes of Final Battle: The Next Election Could Be The Last. The public debate about the 2020 election like all public debates has been framed by Democrats’ readiness to demonize their opponents and make brazenly false accusations about their actions and motives. According to Democrats the 2020 election was the fairest, most just election ever. Anyone who questions this preposterous conclusion, moreover, is committing an unthinkable act of treason – and constitutes an existential threat to our democracy.
In the real world, as opposed to this fiction, Democrats themselves have questioned the legitimacy of every single presidential election that Republicans have won since 1980. They have done so by going to the well of the House to call for the de-certification of Republican electors.
The reality is that Democrats have been stealing elections since the days of Tammany Hall, and their alliances with big city mafias. It is a widely accepted fact that John F. Kennedy was elected by the narrowest of margins with the help of Sam Giancana and the Chicago mob who stuffed the ballot boxes and voted the cemeteries in Cook County.
Here’s the reality of the 2020 election, which Biden officially won by .027% of the vote or 43,000 votes out of 159 million. In other words roughly 20,000 out of 159 million votes could have changed the result.
It is often overlooked that in this election President Trump became the only sitting president in the history of the country to increase his vote total in seeking a second term, which he did by increasing it 11 million votes to 74 million. Biden, who campaigned from his basement got 80 million votes if you can believe the official tally, or roughly 16 million more than Obama at his peak.
These results didn’t happen by normal campaigning. In July 2020, six months before the presidential election, the Democrats sent out a task force of 600 lawyers and 10,000 volunteers, whose mission was to change the election rules and tip the scales in Biden’s favor.
According to the U.S. Constitution, the election rules are set by the state legislatures. But in key battleground states like Georgia and Pennsylvania, as a result of Democrat lobbying the election rules were not set by the legislatures that Republicans controlled. In Georgia they were set by a backroom deal between a Trump-hating Republican Secretary of State and Hillary Clinton’s fixer law firm, Perkins Coie.
In Pennsylvania, where Republicans also controlled the state legislature, the election rules were set by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court which had a 5-2 Democrat majority. Eleven days before the election they removed the signature verification requirement. Now why would they do that, except to cheat? And in fact one ballot dump of 570,000 votes in the middle of the night in Pennsylvania assigned 99.4% of the votes to Biden and only .6% to Trump.
To protest travesties like this, the Trump team submitted 61 lawsuits with massive documentation of irregularities. None of this evidence was ever examined.
Trump felt abandoned by the Republican legislatures that allowed the Democrats to ignore the Constitution and deliver election authority to Democrat-controlled entities that would tilt the scales in their favor.
In changing the election rules, the Democrat task force did not pursue random agendas but followed a strategic plan, based on how their changes would make it easier to cheat.
Their model was provided by the Carter-Baker Commission on Election Reform. The 2000 Bush-Gore election had irregularities that eventually had to be resolved by the Supreme Court which decided the election in favor of Bush. The problems with election integrity were so severe that in 2005, Jimmy Carter and Bush’s former chief of staff formed the bi-partisan Carter-Baker Commission. The Commission issued a report listing the chief reforms necessary to ensure election integrity and make cheating more difficult.
In 2020, the strategy adopted by the Democrat task force was to reverse every recommendation of the Carter-Baker Commission and make cheating easier.
Number one of the Carter-Baker recommendations was to avoid the use of unsolicited paper ballots. It described these as “the main source of potential voter fraud.” In the 2020 presidential election, Democrat secretaries of state sent out 44 million unsolicited paper ballots dramatically increasing the opportunities for voter fraud.
The second key recommendation of the Commission was to increase the number of laws requiring voter I.D.’s to cast a ballot. The Democrats launched an endless smear campaign against voter I.D.s calling them Jim Crow 2.0 – a racist attempt to suppress minority votes. There was zero evidence to back up this claim since minorities were voting in record numbers in states with voter-I.D. laws. Other reforms recommended by the Commission were to ban third party ballot harvesting opaerations and unguarded ballot boxes. In other words to prevent voting by proxy. All of these voting methods were required by the new rules the Democrats put in place.
January 6th was the date set to certify the electors. On that day Trump gave his famous “Stop the Steal” speech, which has been maliciously described by Democrats as a criminal “incitement to insurrection.” This was absurd on its face, since Trump had offered the Capitol Police and Nancy Pelosi 10,000 national guardsmen to control the crowds. Trump’s offer was duly noted by the Inspector General who attended the meeting. Pelosi and the Democrat-controlled Capitol Police rejected the offer.
In his Stop the Steal speech, Trump described some of the more egregious ballot-fixing actions of the Democrats, blamed the looming loss of the election on “weak Republicans” who allowed these changes in the law to happen. He urged his followers to march “peacefully” and “patriotically” to the Capitol to stiffen weak Republican spines.
If you fail to do so, Trump added, you must go home and primary the weak Republicans so we can win the next election.
You could not imagine a speech less insurrectionary or more respectful of the democratic process than that.
Later that day, a relatively peaceful protest took place inside the Capitol that was immediately attacked by the Democrats as an “armed insurrection” and the most heinous crime in American history comparable to 9/11 and the burning of the White House in 1812.
More likely, this was the biggest lie in American history. No arms were found among the 800 or so people arrested. This forced the Democrats to revise their smear and call it just an insurrection. But you can’t overthrow the government without arms. That didn’t deter Democrats from ritualistically describing January 6th as an “insurrection” driven by white supremacy and Islamophobia as though that was reality instead of a hoax. The Democrats also claimed that 5 Capitol police officers were killed by the demonstrators. The correct number is zero. Four of the deaths were suicides months after the 6th and one was by a Trump supporting Capitol Police officer who died of a stroke in his bed at home on January 7. But shameless Democrat leaders like Joe Biden and Hakeem Jeffries were still repeating this lie as late as last fall.
Only one person was shot and killed on January 6th in the Capitol. Ashli Babbitt was a five-foot tall air force veteran who was unarmed and threatening no one when she was murdered by a Capitol police officer. The murder was captured on video. Nancy Pelosi hid the identity of the shooter for months while she quashed any investigation, then publicly exonerated him, and gave him a medal.
A real investigation – if it would have been allowed to happen could have led to the conclusion that Pelosi was an accomplice to murder. This is a measure of how criminal the Democrat Party has become.
3. The Biden Regime
Biden’s inauguration was January 20. He began with a brazen lie that he would unify the country and represent both those who voted for him and those who did not.
Then he issued a series of executive orders that illegally and unconstitutionally nullified our immigration laws, and welcomed a flood of unvetted illegals from 200 countries to invade our country. This was the greatest crime ever committed by our government against its own people.
Here’s a glimpse of its impact: In 2018 the Government Accounting Office issued a report on the number of illegal migrants in American prisons and jails in the five years between 2011 and 2016. Keep in mind that during Joe Biden’s first two years in office more illegals entered the country than in all twelve years of the Obama and Trump presidencies combined. So you can probably multiply the following figures by a factor of 3.
According to the Government Accounting Office, in the five years between 2011 and 2016, there were 730,000 illegals in U.S. prisons and jails. They accounted for 4.9 million arrests thanks to the revolving door that Democrats have provided criminals with and 7.5 million crimes. These crimes included 1 million drug arrests, 500,000 assaults, 134,000 sexual assaults, 24,000 kidnappings, 33,000 homicides and 1500 terrorist-related events.
Even worse in measuring the moral depths to which the Democrat Party has sunk is to consider the fate of unaccompanied minors under their rule. Recall Democrats’ outrage when Trump arrested the illegal parents of 4000 minors who were not allowed under American law to accompany their parents to prison while they were being processed for deportation.
They remained in the facilities that Obama had built, cared for by Border Patrol. Democrat outrage knew no bounds. Biden personally accused Trump of “ripping babies from the arms of their mothers” and put in cages reminiscent of Auschwitz. This slander was hammered home by Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and every other leading Democrat. “It’s criminal” Biden said in disgust. Responding to the faux outrage, Trump ended the policy within two months.
But when Biden took charge f the Oval Office, he made it a point to welcome unaccompanied minors to come to the United States, assuring them they would not be deported.
So instead of 4,000 parentless kids temporarily separated, the number exploded to 250,000 with 100,000 of those “lost” – that is, somewhere in the United States unknown to our government and in the tender care of ruthless drug cartels, sex traffickers and other criminals ready to rape and exploit them as child laborers in jobs that adults won’t do.
This unconscionable treatment of migrant children is a horrifying stain on our country, inflicted by the morally depraved leadership of the Democrat Party.
What is the goal of this radicalized party that leads to such atrocities? It is the dismantling of the American system and its replacement by a totalitarian state.
In addition to his illegal destruction of America’s borders, Biden announced at his inaugural that the main theme of his domestic policy would be “Equity” – by which he meant a government redistribution of resources, wealth and privileges by skin color. To justify this policy Biden claimed that America was and had always been a systemically racist society, and that systemic racism touched every aspect of American life.
These were monstrous lies, worthy of our most dedicated enemies, which, thanks to the radical takeover of the schools have become the dominant view of America’s record on race relations. It is an attitude designed to destroy our country and its political system by making Americans ashamed of their national heritage, and actual achievements in providing opportunity to all.
For the record, there is no systemic racism in American institutions. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 specifically outlawed systemic racism. If any institution was systemically racist there would be a tsunami of lawsuits filed by racial ambulance chasers like Benjamin Crump, extracting million-dollar penalties for violations of the Civil Rights law and the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. There is no such tsunami because there is no systemic racism.
The war on white people is really a war on America, its creation, and its future. It is a weapon selectively used to demonize Republican politicians who belong to the party of Lincoln and support Martin Luther King’s vision of a color-blind society. This was also the vision of the founders, which is why the words “white” and “black” do not appear in the Constitution.
The anti-white racism that pervades the outlook of the Democrat Party and informs its policies is no more subtle than the anti-black racism of the Ku Klux Klan. But it doesn’t emanate from the fever swamps of America’s backwater regions. It has been manufactured and promoted in the editorial rooms of the New York Times and the boardrooms of the Pulitzer Foundation, the offices of the teacher unions and the faculties of our universities and schools, which makes it far more dangerous.
Here’s two ominous results. We now have a serious problem of recruitment in our military because the Secretary of Defense, Lloyd Austin and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, General Mark Milley, are anti-white racists who have made the demonization of white America a core element of military training.
Our system of justice is also imperiled by this anti-white racism. We have just appointed an anti-white racist to the U.S. Supreme Court who is such an ideologue that she can’t tell you what a woman is. She has been appointed to a position whose only job is to defend the Constitution but she is a believer in Critical Race Theory which maintains that the Constitution, a document that does not contain the word “white” is a white supremacist contract that should not be respected.
America is not now and never was a racist country. It is true that in the effort to defend slavery, southerners developed a poisonous anti-black ideology that flooded the region with racism.
But American slavery itself was not a racist institution. If it were – and America is a white supremacist country – how can you explain the existence of 500,000 black citizens who were free on the eve of the Civil War? You can’t.
Slavery existed in Africa for a thousand years before a white man ever set foot on the continent. Slavery in America was an imported institution. Virtually every black slave shipped to America was enslaved by black Africans and sold to Americans at slave auctions in Ghana and Benin. They were, in turn, freed by historic sacrifices made by mainly white Americans, 360,000 of whom made the ultimate sacrifice to set blacks free.
In all history there is not another case of one race making such sacrifices to free another.
Every nation needs to be proud of its history in order to defend itself. Americans can be proud of ours.
4. Gospel of the Fuhrer
How do I justify the subtitle of my book: The Last Election Could Be the Last? In fact, I finished it too soon to capture the Democrats’latest attempt to cancel our democracy. Mobilize corrupt Soros district attorneys like Alvin Bragg, to smother your political opponent with bogus indictments that could land him in jail or tied up in so many court proceedings that he couldn’t reach his constituents.
But the real threat can only be assessed by gauging the mentality of one’s opponents. For example, how committed are Democrats to the legal system under which we live? Here’s an incident you may be unaware of.
January 2, 2021 happened to be the one-year anniversary of the death of General Qasim Soleimani, whose assassination Trump had ordered. Soleimani was the leading terrorist in the world. He was responsible for thousands of American deaths including every wounded warrior blown up by an I.E.D. that you see on television. The Democrats condemned Trump’s decision to kill Soleimani because he was a “government official.” They said to kill this terrorist-mastermind was “provocative.”
The Iranian regime took a grimmer view. Its dictator Rouhani said that Trump would not only be removed from office – he had already lost the rigged election – but “he would be removed from life. We cannot forgive the killing of Soleimani.”
As you can imagine this threat led to a scrambling of White House security officials, led by the president’s military adviser General Milley. Details of how Milley led these security meetings were provided by two Washington Post reporters who were present.
According to the Post reporters, Milley’s “chief concern” was not the Iranian threat to the American president but remarks Trump had made in tweets that night regarding the 2020 election. Milley described Trump’s Stop the Steal speech as “the Gospel of the Fuhrer.” He told close aides that listening to President Trump was “like reading George Orwell’s 1984. “Lies are truth. Division is unity. Evil is good.” “This is a Reichstag moment” he said.
Milley went on to call Trump’s supporters “the guys we fought in World War II.” “They’re Nazis.” He proposed ringing the Capitol with barbed wire and 25,000 troops – not to keep out the Iranian terrorists, but to keep out the Maga Republicans and their alleged domestic terrorist threat. “We’re going to put a ring of steel around the Capitol,” he said, “and these Nazis aren’t going to get in.” Of course, no threat ever materialized.
Even more disturbing than these ravings by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, was their endorsement by American elites. “You know what Milley was doing,” said CNN’s Anderson Cooper, “which you know was obeying the Constitution…. That’s what a patriot does.”
Actually, it would be hard to imagine a clearer form of treason.
In America’s constitutional order, the military is under civilian control, and the president is the commander-in-chief.
Yet Republicans failed to notice or mention this betrayal, and expose the extent of Democrat malice in the process.
Our country is in deep trouble. It can only be saved if actual patriots will step up and answer the call.
Reader Interactions
Comments
White House Claims Biden Family Business Represents ‘No’ National Security Threat
John Kirby, National Security Council coordinator for strategic communications, denied on Monday the Biden family’s business schemes represent a national security threat despite admitting he had not read the House Oversight Committee report on the matter.
In May, the House Oversight Committee’s probe found the Biden family business over the course of several years received at least $10 million from business schemes in Romania and China in return for what appears to be influence peddling. In total, nine Biden family members received payments from the family foreign business ventures, including two of Joe Biden’s grandchildren, the investigation revealed.
“Have you read the report yourself and do you personally think there are any national security concerns here?” a White House Daily Caller correspondent asked Kirby during Monday’s White House press briefing.
“No, and no.” he responded.
The question on Monday was the second time in one week reporters raised the topic of the Biden family business during a White House press briefing.
During last Wednesday’s White House press briefing, a reporter asked Kirby what he thought about a recent Harvard/Harris poll that found 53 percent of Americans, including a quarter of Democrats, believe Joe Biden “was involved with his son in an illegal influence peddling scheme.”
“What do you say to the majority of Americans who believe that the president is himself corrupt?” the reporter asked Kirby.
“Wow,” Kirby replied, pausing before claiming that “there’s nothing to these claims.”
The questions come as the House Oversight Committee opened a new line of investigation into an unclassified document that allegedly details an arrangement involving an exchange of money for policy decisions between now-President Joe Biden and a foreign national.
The FBI possesses the document from an interview the bureau conducted with the informant, who is reportedly a “highly credible” FBI source with a history dating back to the Obama administration era.
FBI Director Christopher Wray refused to hand over the subpoenaed record to the custody of the House Oversight Committee. On Monday, Committee Chair James Comer (R-KY) announced the committee will move Thursday to hold Wray in contempt of Congress.
“FBI officials confirmed that the unclassified, FBI-generated record has not been disproven and is currently being used in an ongoing investigation,” Comer explained. “The confidential human source who provided the information about then-Vice President Joe Biden being involved in a criminal bribery scheme is a trusted, highly credible informant who is being used by the FBI for over ten years and has been paid over six figures.”
Follow Wendell Husebø on Twitter @WendellHusebø. He is the author of Politics of Slave Morality.
Nat’l Black Farmers Assn. Pres. on Report U.S. Paid Chinese Food Producers: We’re Giving China Resources to Buy our Farms
On Friday’s broadcast of the Fox News Channel’s “Fox & Friends First,” National Black Farmers Association President John Boyd Jr. reacted to a report by Sen. Joni Ernst (R-IA) and Open the Books that the U.S. government has given at least $490 million in U.S. grants and contracts to Chinese entities and another $870 million to Russian entities since 2017, including $1.6 million to Chinese food producers by stating that China is buying up American farms, “and this administration is giving them resources to do these types of things.”
Boyd said, “You know, when you look at what China is doing, they’re buying America’s farms. So, when I spoke about farm foreclosures, it’s operatives like Chinese organizations that are purchasing these farms right here in the United States. So, we can’t go to China and buy their farms, but they can come to right here in the United States and buy our farms, and this administration is giving them resources to do these types of things. Something is terribly, terribly wrong with this picture and we have to look at what’s really going on. The American farmer is suffering right here with the highest input costs we’ve had in our nation’s history for America’s farmers. We’re out here struggling and we’re managing to help countries like China and Russia, America’s two biggest adversaries.”
Follow Ian Hanchett on Twitter @IanHanchett
No comments:
Post a Comment