HOW MANY OF THESE PIGS ARE GAMER LAWYERS?
This is a joke that will be repeated over and over by the media and other Dems: ‘No one is above the law’
Here is a short list of people who have essentially been above the law no matter how many lies they tell under oath or how many crimes they commit.
- Hillary Clinton
- Lois Lerner
- Eric Holder
- James Clapper
- Adam Schiff
- Fifty-one former intelligence officials who vouched for a fictitious document to elect a corrupt Democrat.
- Andrew McCabe
- James Comey
- Joe Biden
They can commit fraud by lying to the FISA Court to illegally spy on political opponents.
They can lie to Congress and hide documents and the corrupt Justice Dept will let them off.
They can illegally target political opponents at IRS
They can mishandle classified documents and destroy computers if they want, and corrupt officials will say that no one will prosecute such crimes.
They can line their pockets with as many kickbacks from foreign sources as they want.
They can produce fake dossiers that can be used by corrupt swamp creatures and complicit members of the media to target political opponents.
Others less prominent can destroy cities and kill and maim cops and others and few will be prosecuted.
They can illegally enter this country without fear of being prosecuted.
No matter how often you lie or commit other crimes, the complicit media will hire you as long as you target Republicans and repeat the talking points to push the radical leftist agenda.
But if you are a Republican who wants to drain the swamp, question an election, or dare ask that foreign officials investigate the corrupt Biden family, you will be impeached and investigated endlessly in search of a crime.
Photo credit: YouTube screengrab
Exclusive — Kevin McCarthy on FBI Whistleblower Document: ‘We Have Not Stopped, and We Will Not Stop’ Investigating Biden Family Corruption
Republicans “have not stopped” and “will not stop” investigating Biden family corruption, even as federal bureaucracies try to stand in the way, House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) said during an appearance on Breitbart News Saturday, walking through the recent document, which points directly to Biden family corruption.
McCarthy walked through the latest revelations of Biden family corruption, which were largely overshadowed this week by the Biden administration opting to indict former President Donald Trump.
Hunter Biden introduces his father, then-Vice President Joe Biden, during the World Food Program USA’s 2016 McGovern-Dole Leadership Award Ceremony at the Organization of American States on April 12, 2016, in Washington, DC (Kris Connor/WireImage).
“We were told by whistleblower that they said there was a document where an individual came to the FBI [and] said they heard that a person had to pay, I believe it was $5 million, for an action that the vice president would take and that they would pass it through shell companies from one to the next, where money could get to the vice president. We wanted to know was that even true and was it looked at,” McCarthy said, explaining that the FBI initially did not acknowledge it had the document in the first place and said it would not comply with the subpoena. Because of that, McCarthy called FBI Director Christopher Wray and said they would hold them in contempt, forcing him to change his mind.
LISTEN:
From there, Wray admitted the document existed, but he only wanted to allow the chairman and the vice chairman to see it. McCarthy explained that was not what they asked for.
FBI Director Christopher Wray is sworn in to testify at a Senate Judiciary Committee oversight hearing, at the Capitol in Washington, Thursday, Aug. 4, 2022. (J. Scott Applewhite/AP)
“Everybody on the committee has a right to it,” he said, explaining that both the Republican and Democrat could review it and come out with different stories, and the public nor the committee members would know what is actually true.
“So we worked forward. … If you don’t supply it to everybody on the committee, we’ll hold you in contempt,” he said, explaining that they found out that “Raskin actually lied about what went on.”
“Bill Barr came out after Raskin saw the document with Comer and said one thing, and Barr said no, that’s not true, that we didn’t say from the investigation this was over. We thought this was credible to look at. And from this information, it was that somebody heard something. You haven’t found the exact dollar going to somebody,” McCarthy said, adding that they have found from other banks they have been investigating “that there were shell companies from the Biden family, that they went all the way down to paying grandchildren in there, that the son was paid, the brother was paid, the daughter in law … through shell companies moving forward, and the money came from foreign entities.”
The 1023 poses questions to the FBI, the speaker explained.
“Did you ever investigate this? And if you investigated this, where’s the information on it?” McCarthy asked. “And are there any more 1023s and people saying this from other countries?”
The House speaker described this information as the “tip of the iceberg,” adding that it “gives us more information to follow and to go get more knowledge as we look through.”
“But we’ve had to fight every step of the way, and we had to uncover this,” he said. “I mean, it’s almost like Comer and Jim Jordan have been detectives, finding little clues and looking other directions, and the administration has been fighting us not to provide it, but I will tell you from Comer, from Jim Jordan … we have not stopped, and we will not stop.”
Breitbart News Saturday airs on SiriusXM Patriot 125 from 10:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. Eastern.
WHEN YOU'RE A SHIT GAMER LAWYER, YOU DON'T LOOSE YOUR JOB BECAUSE YOU'RE ONLY BEING 'CRAFTY'.
LIKE HELL THEY ARE!
“The government acknowledges and deeply regrets that it made serious mistakes,” Robert Senior, then-chief of the Miami U.S. attorney’s criminal division, wrote, according to the report.
ALL LAWYERS ARE LYING PARASITE GAMERS OF THE LAW!
Special Counsel Prosecutor Karen Gilbert’s History of ‘Corruption’ Clouds Trump Indictment
Karen Gilbert, a Justice Department prosecutor who is leading the government’s case against former President Donald Trump related to his handling of allegedly classified documents, has a history of corruption and was once reprimanded by a federal judge for secretly recording a defense lawyer and his investigator.
Gilbert, who is Special Counsel Jack Smith’s deputy and a federal prosecutor, is “one of the most corrupt prosecutors to ever come out of the Southern District of Miami,” according to Kash Patel, a former top Trump administration official and also a former prosecutor.
“The lead prosecutor Karen Gilbert, who is likely to be the trial attorney in the Southern District of Florida, in 2009 was so reprimanded in a narcotics trafficking case that she had to retire from her position,” Patel said in a Fox News interview on Friday.
“Years later, she was promoted upwards at the DOJ,” he said. “She is the Weissmann to Jack Smith and she has been pulling the reins on this investigation,” he said, in reference to Andrew Weissmann, who was the aggressive deputy to former Special Counsel Robert Mueller.
According to a March 27, 2009, Associated Press report, Gilbert resigned as chief of the narcotics section of the Miami U.S. attorney’s office after she and another prosecutor were involved in the secret tape recording of a defense lawyer and his investigator.
The Justice Department later said in a filing that it “deeply regrets” the incident and that internal safeguards were not followed, according to the report. “The government acknowledges and deeply regrets that it made serious mistakes,” Robert Senior, then-chief of the Miami U.S. attorney’s criminal division, wrote, according to the report.
In that case, the defendant, Dr. Ali Shaygan, was acquitted of all 141 counts claiming he illegally prescribed pain medications. Two witnesses in the case were asked to record conversations with the defense lawyer and his investigator, but Gilbert did not seek permission from then-U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta or from other senior officials, nor did she “disclose to the defense that the witnesses were cooperating with the government.”
According to another report by the Miami Herald, Gilbert and the other prosecutor began “a secret, undisclosed side investigation of Shaygan’s legal team, citing a suspicion of witness tampering on the part of the defense.”
“No evidence surfaced that the defense team was manipulating witnesses. On the contrary, defense attorneys rejected bribery invitations floated on tape from government informants,” the report said.
U.S. District Judge Alan Gold wrote a harshly critical 50-page order that said Gilbert and the other prosecutor had knowingly and repeatedly violated ethical guidelines and acted deceptively and “in bad faith,” and ordered the government to pay Shaygan $601,795. He also referred the incident to the Justice Department’s Office of Professional Responsibility for disciplinary action and the Florida Bar for review.
“Before she got slapped by the courts, she resigned from her position. This person is leading this prosecution,” Patel said.
Breitbart News asked the Justice Department why Gilbert should be trusted by the American public to work on the case given her history of reprimands for unethical behavior, but did not receive a response by publication.
On Friday morning, CNN reported that prosecutors had obtained a transcript of a 2021 recording of Trump where he allegedly discussed possessing a classified document.
According to CNN, Trump had said about the document, “As president, I could have declassified, but now I can’t.”
The audio was reportedly obtained in 2021 at a meeting in Trump’s home in Bedminster, New Jersey, with former aides, including a communications specialist named Margo Martin, and two people who were working on a book about former Trump Chief of Staff Mark Meadows.
According to the report, Trump in the recording was complaining about Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley.
“He said that I wanted to attack Iran. Isn’t that amazing? I have a big pile of papers, this thing just came up. Look. This was him,” Trump allegedly said, indicating it was Milley who wanted to attack Iran, not him.
“They presented me this – this is off the record, but – they presented me this. This was him. This was the Defense Department and him. We looked at some. This was him. This wasn’t done by me, this was him,” Trump allegedly said.
“All sorts of stuff – pages long, look. Wait a minute, let’s see here. I just found, isn’t that amazing? This totally wins my case, you know. Except it is like, highly confidential. Secret. This is secret information. Look, look at this.”
Trump has maintained that as president, he declassified all documents he had in his possession after leaving office.
Harvard University Emeritus Professor of Law Alan Dershowitz in a Newsweek op-ed downplayed the recording as a smoking gun.
“It is unlikely that the recording of Trump showing classified material to a writer will suffice, unless prosecutors can establish the contents of these documents and that they were actually read by an unauthorized person,” he wrote. “There must be evidence of willful conduct that violates clear and unambiguous laws and that gives honest prosecutors no choice but to indict.”
Follow Breitbart News’s Kristina Wong on Twitter, Truth Social, or on Facebook.
DOJ Covers Up $5M Biden Bribe From Burisma While Indicting Trump
"$5 million for one Biden, $5 million for the other Biden"
The Biden Justice Department and its various arms were fighting to keep a document alleging that Biden had accepted a $5 million bribe hidden from the public. That’s the same DOJ that is ordinarily more than happy to leak materials involving Trump and conservative targets to the media. The DOJ and the FBI ignored a congressional subpoena and only contempt charges provided limited access to the Biden bribe document.
The FBI claimed that it was following DOJ policy to protect confidential sources. Except that the supposed concern for the confidential source would suggest that Biden is not only guilty, but that the money trail leads to some dangerous people. And yet little follow-up work appears to have been done on the investigation.
The apparent contents of the bribe document leaked once members of Congress were given access to it.
President Joe Biden was allegedly paid $5 million by an executive of the Ukrainian natural gas firm Burisma Holdings, where his son Hunter Biden sat on the board, a confidential human source told the FBI during a June 2020 interview, sources familiar told Fox News Digital.
The FD-1023 form, dated June 30, 2020, is the FBI’s interview with a “highly credible” confidential source who detailed multiple meetings and conversations he or she had with a top Burisma executive over the course of several years, starting in 2015. Fox News Digital has not seen the form, but it was described by several sources who are aware of its contents.
The Burisma executive sought the advice of the confidential source, a business professional, on gaining U.S. oil rights and getting involved with a U.S. oil company, the sources familiar with the document said. The Burisma executive was speaking with the confidential source to “get advice on the best way to go forward” in 2015 and 2016.
According to the FD-1023 form, the confidential human source said the Burisma executive discussed Hunter’s role on the board. The confidential human source questioned why the Burisma executive needed his or her advice in acquiring access to U.S. oil if he had Hunter Biden on the board. The Burisma executive answered by referring to Hunter Biden as “dumb.”
The Burisma executive explained to the confidential source that Burisma had to “pay the Bidens” because Ukrainian prosecutor Viktor Shokin was investigating Burisma, and explained how difficult it would be to enter the U.S. market in the midst of that investigation.
The confidential source further detailed that conversation, suggesting to the Burisma executive that he “pay the Bidens $50,000 each,” to which the Burisma executive replied, it is “not $50,000,” it is “$5 million.”
“$5 million for one Biden, $5 million for the other Biden,” the Burisma executive told the confidential human source, according to a source familiar with the document.
A source familiar said according to the document, the $5 million payments appeared to reference a kind of “retainer” Burisma intended to pay the Bidens to deal with a number of issues, including the investigation led by Shokin. Another source referred to the arrangement as a “pay-to-play” scheme.
We already have clear evidence of a pattern of corruption in which a large complicated network of shell companies were used to funnel money to members of the Biden family. We already know Hunter Biden got a major pay cut after daddy left the room. Nobody seriously believes that Hunter’s board membership at Burisma was anything other than an influence-buying operation with a guy whose chief asset was his last name.
Biden is denying everything.
Congressional Republicans who read an FBI informant file accusing President Biden of a role in a $5 million bribery scheme said Thursday that it involved the Ukrainian company Burisma — but Biden tauntingly retorted, “Where’s the money?”
“It’s a bunch of malarkey,” Biden told a Post reporter when asked about the bribery claim hours after FBI Director Christopher Wray agreed to let rank-and-file House Oversight Committee members read a June 2020 document in a bid to avoid being held in contempt.
That’s a good question.
If Biden is hiding income, that’s an actual crime. Not just a process crime.
The DOJ has shrugged this off, meanwhile, Trump is being indicted on what appears to amount to a process crime. After 8 years of false allegations and claims of foreign payments that failed to show a single cent actually being paid to Trump for political influence from abroad (remember the failed Alfa Bank smear?), he’s being indicted for something that every high-profile politician has done, retain classified documents, not on the act itself, but as a process crime emerging from the witch hunt over it.
Much as in 2016, when Hillary Clinton got a pass over mishandling classified documents, there’s a glaring double standard here that is at the heart of the weaponization of the DOJ against political opponents of the Left.
Daniel Greenfield
Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical Left and Islamic terrorism.
Reader Interactions
James Comer: There are more Biden documents
Elon Musk EXPOSED Joe Biden And Barack Obama's CORRUPTION!
TRUMP Campaign releases new ad, "Wolves"
Child Support Case Judge Threatens Hunter Biden With 1 Year in Jail and $20K Fine
An Arkansas judge on Monday issued an order threatening Hunter Biden with up to a year of prison time and a $20,000 fine if he fails to provide financial information and appear in court next month to answer questions from the counsel of his child’s mother.
Last year, Hunter Biden opened up his paternity agreement with Lunden Roberts, the mother of his child, citing “a substantial material change” in his “financial circumstances, including but not limited to his income.” Hunter Biden’s payments are $20,000 per month, a calculation based on income.
Hunter Biden’s financials could reveal information about his family’s business deals and his anonymous art sales.
For example, they could reveal how much Hunter Biden earned from his interest in BHR Partners, a Chinese state-backed investment fund founded just days after Hunter and President Joe Biden visited China in 2013. Hunter Biden held a ten percent stake in BHR Partners through an entity called Skaneateles LLC. Documents obtained by Breitbart News revealed Skaneateles LLC is controlled by Kevin Morris, Hunter’s top attorney, who also paid Hunter’s IRS debts.
If Hunter Biden does not provide financial information and show up for the court appearance, the judge said he will face “six months in jail for criminal contempt, six months in jail for civil contempt, and a $20,000 fine payable to Ms. Roberts,” the Sun reported.
In early May, Hunter Biden appeared before the Independence County circuit judge, who ordered him to answer questions about his financials and sit for an interview under oath in a child support case against his daughter’s mother. The judge also scheduled a hearing for July to determine the child support dispute.
“Mr. Biden does not want to disclose his income and assets, says that he is somewhat financially destitute, while he lives on a mountain overlooking the Pacific Ocean in Malibu, has Secret Service protection, and enjoys his time abroad,” Roberts’s legal team wrote.
Hunter Biden’s court case in Arkansas is just one of his legal challenges. He faces a Justice Department investigation into potential tax and gun violations and is the center of the House Oversight Committee’s probe into the Biden family for nine potential violations.
Follow Wendell Husebø on Twitter @WendellHusebø. He is the author of Politics of Slave Morality.
Arkansas Judge Orders Hunter Biden Back to Court, Says Burden Is on Him to Avoid Jail Time
Hunter Biden has been ordered to appear in an Arkansas court next month to face questions about his financial status and defend himself against contempt allegations that could carry a penalty of up to six months in jail.
The Monday order from Arkansas Circuit Court Judge Holly Meyer came weeks after Lunden Alexis Roberts, the mother of Biden’s four-year-old daughter, asked the court to hold Biden in both civil and criminal contempt for failing to turn over requested financial information. Biden has been fighting to reduce his $20,000-per-month child support payments, which he says he can no longer afford.
The July 10 hearing could further complicate Biden’s legal issues, which include a federal tax probe and a House Oversight Committee investigation into potential influence-peddling by the Biden family.
Judge Meyer said Biden must appear in July to "show cause, if any exists, why he should not be held in contempt" and to "determine if a finding of contempt and sanctions are appropriate." The judge said she will consider a range of penalties, including fines and "incarceration for criminal contempt for a period of up to six months."
She added that Biden’s "ability to pay" child support "is or may become a critical issue in the contempt proceeding," opening him up to questions about his financial condition in court.
Biden "will have an opportunity at the hearing to respond to statements and questions about his financial status" and "is subject to an express finding by the court that he has the ability to pay," said Judge Meyer.
If Biden is held in contempt, the court could toss out his motion to reduce his child support payments, and another motion he filed to block his four-year-old daughter from using the "Biden" last name.
Roberts’s lawyer, Clint Lancaster, said in a contempt motion in May that Biden was "playing hide the ball" and has not turned over complete information about his income, assets, and investments. Lancaster said the court should hold Biden in contempt to make him a "believer in the rule of law."
Biden’s legal team countered that he has complied with discovery to the best of his ability, but he "does not have access to some of the information requested for various reasons."
The July 10 hearing would be Biden’s second public appearance in the case since it was filed four years ago. His first was last month.
Judge Meyer previously rejected requests by Roberts’s legal team to hold Biden in contempt, most recently in early May. She said at the time that the motion had "not been properly pled."
However, she also warned Biden at a May 1 hearing that there would be consequences for continuing to withhold financial records, and wrote in a recent order that the court "will not accept cryptic or vague answers to discovery and may treat such answers as a failure to answer."
Published under: Arkansas , Court , Feature , Hunter Biden
Poll: Majority of Voters Say FBI Covered Up Alleged Joe Biden Bribery Doc
A majority of voters believe FBI officials tried to cover up a bureau informant file that allegedly details a $5 million bribery scheme involving an exchange of money for policy decisions between now-President Joe Biden and a foreign national, a Rasmussen Reports poll found Wednesday.
The FBI’s informant file allegedly linked Joe Biden to the family’s business deals in Ukraine, House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer (R-KY) revealed Tuesday. The FBI file originated from an interview the bureau conducted with an informant, who is reportedly a “highly credible” FBI source with a history dating back to the Barack Obama administration.
The FBI refused to comply with Comer’s subpoena for nearly a month. Eleven hours before the House Oversight Committee planned to assemble to vote on holding FBI Director Wray in Contempt of Congress, the FBI agreed to permit all members of the Oversight Committee to review an unclassified file.
The bureau’s capitulation came on the same day polling revealed that 60 percent of voters believe it is likely that top FBI officials helped cover up any alleged wrongdoing the document might detail by Joe Biden or his family, including 48 percent who believe it is “very likely.”
“Thirty-three percent (33%) don’t believe an FBI cover-up is likely, including 16% who say it is Not At All Likely,” the poll found.
The poll surveyed 999 likely voters from June 4-6 with a +/- three percent margin of error.
The committee stated Wednesday:
After weeks of refusing to even admit the FD-1023 record exists, the FBI has caved and is now allowing all members of the Oversight and Accountability Committee to review this unclassified record that memorializes a confidential human source’s conversations with a foreign national who claimed to have bribed then-Vice President Joe Biden.
“Allowing all Oversight Committee members to review this record is an important step toward conducting oversight of the FBI and holding it accountable to the American people,” the committee added.
Related — Dem Rep. Goldman: House GOP’s Corruption Allegation Against Biden “Complete Garbage”
Follow Wendell Husebø on Twitter @WendellHusebø. He is the author of Politics of Slave Morality.
Grassley: ‘I Believe the FBI Is Covering for President Biden’
Wednesday, during an appearance on FNC’s “Jesse Watters Tonight,” Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, accused the FBI of covering for President Joe Biden.
Grassley was referring to the FBI’s alleged stonewalling regarding House inquiries into potential wrongdoing by Biden and members of his family.
“Senator Chuck Grassley, you’re a resolute guy,” FNC Jesse Watters said. “You are patient. You’ve done this before. You know how this works. Do you feel like the Department of Justice and the FBI are playing games?”
“Absolutely,” Grassley replied. “First of all, I want to compliment Congressman Comer because he has been very helpful with working me on this issue. And we wouldn’t be where we are with the FBI if he hadn’t been involved.”
“So, let me answer your question this way,” he continued. “We have an unclassified document. We have what the FBI calls a credible source because they paid this person over the years, six figures. And I’ve got a reputation for protecting whistleblowers, and we’re going to keep going until we get this document. But, yes, I believe the FBI is covering for President Biden. And the information that’s in this is from a credible source, from credible whistleblowers, people that are protected by the Whistleblower Protection Law, and we just got to get to the bottom of it, and we’re not going to give up until we get this document.”
“Senator Grassley, we’re hearing the FBI says they can’t protect this whistleblower if this document drops, he might wind up dead,” Watters asked. “How does that make you feel?”
“Well, let’s put it this way,” Grassley replied. “Look at — compared to the way they’re treating Congress as a second-class citizen. They gave the New York Times on May 18 a classified document. We have an unclassified document, and they gave them the name of a human source. Did they worry about that person being assassinated? I think that’s all blue smoke.”
Follow Jeff Poor on Twitter @jeff_poor
Tim Scott on Trump Indictment: We Are Seeing ‘Weaponization’ of DOJ Against a Former President
Republican presidential candidate Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC) said Thursday on FNC’s “Fox News Tonight” that we were seeing “weaponization of the Department of Justice against a former president” when responding to reports the former president Donald Trump will be indicted in the Mar-a-Lago classified documents probe.
Anchor Harris Faulkner said, “We turn now to Senator Tim Scott, running in the Republican field for the nomination of the Republican Party for the White House against Donald Trump. Senator, it’s an awkward position to be in, but the bottom line is you’re a Republican. This was a Republican president. Look what’s happened. Your reaction.”
Scott said, “Well, Harris, more importantly I’m an American. Let’s look at what’s happening to an American. More importantly then the Republicans and Democrats, red or blue, black or white, is this notion that our nation is the greatest nation on earth because Lady Justice has a blindfold on. That means Republicans are not hunted and Democrats are not protected. It means that we look at every single case based on the evidence. In America, every single person is presumed innocent, not guilty. What we’ve seen over the last several years is the weaponization of the Department of Justice against a former president. You don’t have to be a Republican to see injustice and want to fix it. You don’t have to be a Democrat to see injustice and want to fix it. You just have to be an American and stand up for the right thing.”
He added, “I don’t care whether you’re in my party or not in my party. I don’t care if you look like me or not. The one thing that makes America the city on the hill is confidence in our justice system, and today what we see is a justice system where the scales are weighted.”
Follow Pam Key on Twitter @pamkeyNEN
J.D. Vance: Biden ‘Using the Justice System to Preemptively Steal the 2024 Election’
Ohio Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH) described the most recent indictment of former President Donald Trump as a “moral and constitutional joke,” blasting Attorney General Merrick Garland as a “disgrace” and asserting that President Biden is “using the justice system to preemptively steal the 2024 election.”
“The former president will be indicted for ‘mishandling’ his own government’s classified info. Yet everyone agrees the president has the authority to declassify anything,” Vance said.
“This is a moral and constitutional joke. Merrick Garland has disgraced this country,” the senator continued, asserting that “Biden is attacking his most likely 2024 opponent.”
“He’s using the justice system to preemptively steal the 2024 election. This is what’s happening, plain and simple,” he added.
Vance’s remarks follow Trump revealing on Truth Social that U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) prosecutors notified his attorneys of the indictment, associated with Special Counsel Jack Smith’s investigation into his handling of White House documents.
Trump wrote in part:
The corrupt Biden Administration has informed my attorneys that I have been Indicted, seemingly over the Boxes Hoax, even though Joe Biden has 1850 Boxes at the University of Delaware, additional Boxes in Chinatown, D.C., with even more Boxes at the University of Pennsylvania, and documents strewn all over his garage floor where he parks his Corvette, and which is “secured” by only a garage door that is paper thin, and open much of the time.
“I am an innocent man,” Trump said. “The Biden administration is totally corrupt.”
The GOP frontrunner concluded that these actions are those of “election interference” and described them as a “continuation of the greatest witch hunt of all time.”
No comments:
Post a Comment