Monday, September 25, 2023

Nearly Two-Thirds of Voters – Including Half of Democrats – Want Border Security in Budget Deal

 

Nearly Two-Thirds of Voters – Including Half of Democrats – Want Border Security in Budget Deal

CRAIG BANNISTER | SEPTEMBER 25, 2023
DONATE
Text Audio
00:0000:00
Font Size

As the nation’s illegal immigration crisis intensifies, nearly two-thirds of voters say they want border security measures included in the next spending bill, even as a partial government shutdown looms if Republicans and Democrats don’t agree by Saturday on whether or not to increase government spending.

A national Rasmussen survey conducted last week asked U.S. likely voters if they “support or oppose making border security part of the negotiations for a new spending bill.”

In response, 63% said they either “strongly support” (43%) or “somewhat support” including border security in the spending bill. Seven percent said they weren’t sure, leaving 30% opposed.

Even half of self-described Democrat voters said they support including border security:

  • 80% of Republicans, 50% of Democrats and 61% of unaffiliated voters at least “somewhat” support including border security in the spending bill.
  • 66% of men and 61% of women support including border security in the spending bill.
  • Young and wealthy voters are both the most likely to oppose a border security measure in the bill.
  • 57% of voters who “strongly approve” of Pres. Joe Biden’s job performance are opposed to including border security in the spending bill.
  • 71% of voters who strongly disapprove of Biden’s performance strongly support making border security part of the spending deal.

 

Among voters who “strongly support” including border security in the spending bill, 70% would prefer a government shutdown to higher spending.

Voters are much more negative than positive about the impact of illegal immigration, results of a separate Rasmussen survey, conducted September 11-13, reveal:

  • By more than three to one, voters say illegal immigration has made their schools worse (39%), rather than better (11%).
  • By a three-to-one margin, voters say illegal immigration has made their local job market worse (33%), not better (11%).
  • By five-to-one, they say illegal immigration has made their local health care system worse (40%), as opposed to better (8%).
  • Democrats, Biden supporters and voters making more than $200,000 annually have the most positive view of the impact of illegal immigration.

 

Meanwhile, the number of immigrants surging across the border into the U.S. has already set a fiscal year (FY) record, with six days left in FY 2023. As a result, border towns have been overwhelmed and thrown into a state of emergency. Texas has taken to installing its own border security structures, in the face of active opposition by the Biden Administration, which has removed wire fences and sued to stop the state from employing border buoys to keep out illegal immigrants seeking to break into the U.S. over waterways.

Since Saturday is the last day of the fiscal year, a partial government shutdown would be triggered if a new spending bill is not passed and signed:

  • 48% of voters support a partial government shutdown until Congress agrees to either cut spending or keep it unchanged.
  • 40% would have Congress approve a higher spending level, in order to avoid a shutdown.
  • 12% aren’t sure which they’d prefer.

 

The business and economic reporting of CNSNews.com is funded in part with a gift made in memory of Dr. Keith C. Wold.



Commentary
Chain Migration and the Diversity Visa Program: Legal Immigration at Its Worst
By Philip Linderman
American Conservative, September 18, 2023
Excerpt: The legal immigration debate is not a “yes” or “no” question, although that is how pro–mass immigration groups like to frame the issue. This misleading slant obscures serious failures in our poorly conceived immigration system that most Americans would soundly reject if they understood it.
Podcast
Terrorist Entry Through the Southwest Border
Host: Mark Krikorian
Guest: Todd Bensman
Parsing Immigration Policy, Episode 123
Featured Posts
Is Cultural Leniency in Order for Afghan Sexual Offenders?
By Nayla Rush
Excerpt: Even if Adil was indeed “rigorously screened” and all the documents pertaining to his judicial history in Afghanistan were available, he would still have been cleared to enter the United States. In Adil’s case, nothing was missed because there was probably nothing to find. As Adil’s lawyer underlined, some sexual conduct that is deemed criminal in the United States is considered normal in Afghanistan, hence the absence of any record of misconduct on that front from his hometown.

NYC Has Become a Refugee Camp Before Our Very Eyes
By Andrew R. Arthur
Excerpt: Under the UNHCR Emergency Handbook, “urban settings” like NYC are supposed to be the preferred alternative to refugee camps. But it’s the city’s own “right-to-shelter law” that has created the camp, and its “sanctuary city” status that ensured it would be filled.
SCOTUS Explains How to End Biden's Immigration Programs
By George Fishman
Excerpt: I recently took a deep dive into the Supreme Court’s 2020 decision in DHS v. Regents of the University of California, in which the Court unexpectedly invalidated the Trump administration’s recission of President Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) administrative amnesty program for illegal aliens claiming to have come to the U.S. as minors.

UN Declares Southwest Border ‘World’s Deadliest Migration Land Route’
By Andrew R. Arthur
Excerpt: A dubious distinction, but hardly a surprise to anyone tracking the disaster unfolding there since Joe Biden took office and decided to simply ignore Congress’ migrant detention mandates.

 
More Blog Posts

No comments: