Joe Biden Shields Palestinians from Deportation, Vows to Give Them U.S. Jobs
President Joe Biden is shielding Palestinians in the United States from deportation while authorizing the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to loosen work requirements to funnel them into American jobs.
On Wednesday, Biden issued a memorandum to DHS and the State Department, providing most Palestinians in the U.S. with “Deferred Enforced Departure” for at least 18 months amid war in Israel with Hamas terrorists.
Ultimately, the memorandum ensures that most Palestinians cannot be deported from the U.S. over the next year and a half — a plan that was first pitched to Biden by the far-left Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR).
“I am directing the deferral of removal of certain Palestinians who are present in the United States,” Biden writes in the memorandum. “… I have determined that it is in the foreign policy interest of the United States to defer for 18 months the removal of any Palestinian subject to the conditions and exceptions provided below.”
Also, the memorandum authorizes DHS to open “employment for noncitizens whose removal has been deferred … for the duration of such deferral” as well as urging the agency to loosen regulations so that Palestinians in the U.S. on F-1 student visas can hold American jobs.
The Biden administration’s economic agenda, for years now, has been to massively inflate the nation’s labor market with millions of newly arrived illegal aliens and legal immigrants.
That agenda has delivered highly successful results for the business lobby and corporate special interests who have a vested financial interest in keeping U.S. wages down by adding millions to the workforce with a constant stream of foreign-born workers to hire.
Former Democrat congressman Dennis Kucinich recently called Biden’s agenda “a plan to drive down wages.”
America’s working and middle class have been detrimentally impacted by the agenda. For instance, the latest employment data reveals that since late 2019, nearly three million illegal aliens and legal immigrants have been added to the workforce, while there are close to 200,000 fewer native-born Americans working today.
In the last year, nearly all new U.S. jobs have gone to foreign-born workers.
John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Email him at jbinder@breitbart.com. Follow him on Twitter here.
JOE BIDEN'S SEC OF OPEN BORDERS MAYORKAS AT WAR WITH AMERICA:
The DHS is working with World Relief, a Christian nonprofit associated with the National Association of Evangelicals, to bring 75 Somalian refugees to the Eau Claire area in the Chippewa Valley by Sept. 30.
Will Islam take over Europe?
Even if all migration into Europe were to immediately and permanently stop -– a “zero migration” scenario -– the Muslim population of Europe still would be expected to rise from the current level of 4.9% to 7.4% by the year 2050, according to a 2017 report from Pew Research.
This is because Muslims are younger (by 13 years, on average) and have higher fertility (one child more per woman, on average) than other Europeans, mirroring a global pattern.
This is just the least-migration-filled scenario. The report states that a second, “medium” migration scenario assumes that all refugee flows will stop as of mid-2016 but that recent levels of “regular” migration to Europe will continue (i.e., migration of those who come for reasons other than seeking asylum).
Under these conditions, Muslims could reach 11.2% of Europe’s population in 2050.
Finally, a “high” migration scenario from this report projects the record flow of refugees into Europe between 2014 and 2016 to continue indefinitely into the future with the same religious composition (i.e., mostly made up of Muslims) in addition to the typical annual flow of regular migrants.
In this scenario, Muslims could make up 14% of Europe’s population by 2050 -– nearly triple the current share, but still considerably smaller than the populations of both Christians and people with no religion in Europe.
The refugee flows of the last few years, however, are extremely high compared with the historical average in recent decades, and already have begun to decline as the European Union and many of the member states have made policy changes aimed at limiting refugee flows.
Predicting future migration levels is impossible, because migration rates are connected not only to political and economic conditions outside of Europe, but also to the changing economic situation and government policies within Europe.
Although none of these scenarios are expected to play out exactly as projected, each provides a set of rough parameters from which to imagine other possible outcomes.
For example, if regular migration continues at recent levels, and some asylum seekers also continue to arrive and receive refugee status -– but not as many as during the historically exceptional surge of refugees from 2014 to 2016 -– then the share of Muslims in Europe’s population as of 2050 would be expected to be somewhere between 11.2% and 14%.
With increased Muslim migration, the potential for conflict rises. Back in 2008, the CIA director, Michael V. Hayden, was quoted by the Washington Post as saying that Europe will continue to see a strong increase in the Muslim population.
At the same time, the birth rates of the long-established European population would continue to decline. The integration of these Muslim migrants will pose major challenges for European states – and significantly increase the potential for civil wars and extremists.
The civil war against “infidel” Europe has long since begun. The historic third wave of attacks against the bulwark of Europe (Bernhard Lewis) is Islam’s most successful conquest campaign in modern times. Muslims everywhere speak openly about their intention to Islamize our continent.
The following highlights very current civil war scenarios from European countries.
This war is still being waged solely by immigrant Muslims against the European majority population, who have been left defenseless against attacks by Muslims so far and who, without exception, have been abandoned by their own governments.
But governments that do not protect their populations quickly lose their legitimacy -– a look at history shows this. The first Europeans have already begun to defend themselves against the Islamic threat by casting out their elected officials. This will continue.
Image: Screen shot from Times Now video, via YouTube
Local NGOs conspiring with Feds to ‘resettle’ Somalis behind the backs of the people and the elected representatives
Wisconsin is a battleground state, but while one side of the aisle grovels for transparency, the other side dominates and conquers. Here’s the story, from Fred Lucas at Fox News:
Wisconsin … is currently a battleground over a refugee resettlement controversy.
Wisconsin officials have sought to meet with officials from the Department of Homeland Security about the first group of Somali refugees to settle in the Eau Claire County area of the state. The issue has even garnered interest from members of Congress.
As it turns out, the controversy arose when it was revealed that neither the citizens nor their local elected representatives knew anything about the plan to bring third world refugees into their neighborhood—the “resettlement” scheme had been foisted upon the people by the federal government, along with its bureaucratic NGO conspirators:
The DHS is working with World Relief, a Christian nonprofit associated with the National Association of Evangelicals, to bring 75 Somalian refugees to the Eau Claire area in the Chippewa Valley by Sept. 30.
In response, a handful of Republicans… put forth a bill to require “greater transparency” regarding future resettlements. (Why not just write another strongly worded letter?) Per Lucas:
State legislators are set this week to advance a bill requiring greater transparency on resettlement decisions. Federal law already requires federal officials to ‘consult regularly (not less often than quarterly) with state and local governments’ before settling the refugees to an area. The state legislation would specifically require consulting with ‘elected officials’ accountable to the public – rather than just appointed officials – as well as a requirement for public comment.
“Greater transparency” and “a requirement for public comment” yields… a whole lotta nothing for conserving America and her values. Somalis are still resettled, which kicks off the chain migration, and before you know it, the state has been conquered and colonized. And a “requirement for public comment”? Kind of like what the federal bureaucracies do before finalizing a new rule? We all know it’s just a formality, and has no bearing on the agenda; they’re going to enact the rule regardless of what the public has to say.
One need only look at Minnesota to see how “resettling” a “few” Somalian “refugees” actually goes, on a not-very-long timeline; as Lucas notes, the Somali population “ballooned” to millions in just two decades. Or, one could observe the current landscape of Lewiston, Maine, which was once a staunchly conservative American enclave with zero gangs; now Somali thugs are part and parcel of the Lewiston experience.
Why not forbid resettlements altogether? Cut off any and all Wisconsin tax dollars flowing to World Relief? If the group has any special tax protections, why not remove them? News flash, it’s not “charity” if you’re dumping financial dependents on the taxpayer, instead of funding the mission yourself—and that’s exactly what World Relief is doing, importing new welfare enrollees (public school, WIC, Medicaid, etc.). What about securing Wisconsin’s borders, and prohibiting DHS agents from stepping into the state?
I’d love for a leftist to explain how it benefits me, a tax-paying American, to import third world “refugees” who have no money, no skills, and no loyalty to this country. If they couldn’t enrich their home nations, how could one expect they have anything to offer here?
The long march through the (formerly) conservative states continues.
Image: Fibonacci Blue from Minnesota, USA, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons, unaltered.
.jpg){kind=link}
No comments:
Post a Comment