WE CAN'T SAVE AMERICA UNTIL WE PUT BIDEN, HIS CUBAN MAYORKAS AND THE BANKSTERS' RENT BOY CHUCK SCHUMER IN GITMO.
VISUALIZE REVOLUTION!
Texas blocked—again—from being able to arrest and deport Illegals
Oh, where to begin in the latest episode of “America’s Judicial Rollercoaster” featuring the audacious blockade by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals against Texas's gallant effort to enforce its own borders?
Yes, you heard that right. In a move that could only be concocted in the wildest dreams of a liberal screenplay writer, the appellate court decided to thumb its nose at the U.S. Supreme Court.
Why? Simply to prevent Texas from using Senate Bill 4 to do the unfathomable: arrest and deport illegal immigrants. Gasp! The horror of a state taking steps to protect its citizens and uphold law and order! From CBS:
Hours after the Supreme Court gave Texas officials permission to jail and prosecute migrants suspected of crossing the U.S. southern border without authorization, an appeals court late Tuesday blocked the state from enforcing its controversial immigration law known as SB4.
In a late-night order, a 5th Circuit Court of Appeals panel dissolved a pause that it issued in early March to suspend a lower court ruling that found SB4 to be unconstitutional.
(“Dissolving the pause” meant that the ruling blocking SB 4 from taking effect issued by the court beneath the 5th Circuit Court was back in play; the 5th Circuit is holding a hearing this morning to determine the legality of SB 4.)
Let’s set the scene further. Senate Bill 4 wasn’t just some whimsical decree by the Lone Star State, but a measured response to an untenable situation at the border. Yet before the ink could dry on this piece of legislative pushback, the Biden administration, in its infinite wisdom, challenged it for daring to tread on what they perceive as exclusive federal ground. Cue the international outcry, led by none other than Mexico, which seemed more concerned about Texas’s laws than its own border policies. Because, of course, in the bizarro world of contemporary politics, securing one’s border is now an act of aggression.
This circus act put on by the appellate court doesn’t just highlight the clash between Texas's resolve and federal inertia; it epitomizes the ideological chasm threatening the very fabric of our republic. The decision to block SB 4 is a stark reminder of how far some are willing to go to undermine state sovereignty and promote a borderless agenda, all while wrapping themselves in the cloak of moral superiority.
What's truly fascinating — or disturbing, depending on your tolerance for political theater — is how this saga underscores the broader conflict between common sense governance and the delirious fever dream of “woke” ideology. It's as if the principles that have guided successful societal organization for millennia are being tossed aside in favor of a reality where feelings trump facts, and enforcement of the law is subject to the whims of emotional appeal rather than the letter of the law.
As we stand at this crossroads, watching the spectacle unfold, one can’t help but ponder the implications for federal-state relations. If a state like Texas can’t take proactive steps to secure its borders without being slapped down by the judicial system, what does that say about our republic? Are we to believe that the federal government, which has abdicated its responsibility in this arena, gets to have the final say while states suffer the consequences?
But wait, there’s more. This ongoing legal kerfuffle isn’t just a policy debate; it’s a litmus test for the soul of America. It challenges us to consider what kind of nation we want to be. Do we aspire to uphold the rule of law, sovereignty, and security, or are we content to descend into a chaotic free-for-all, governed by the capricious dictates of “woke” ideology?
As the 2024 presidential election looms, this issue will undoubtedly take center stage, shaping the narrative and forcing candidates to take a stand. Will they side with the rule of law and the principles of sovereignty, or will they capitulate to the forces of chaos and moral relativism?
In the end, the appellate court’s decision is more than a legal anomaly; it’s a clarion call for a moral and intellectual revival. For if we continue down this path, ignoring the lessons of history and the foundational principles of our republic, we risk not just the integrity of our borders, but the very essence of what it means to be America. So, buckle up, folks. It’s going to be a bumpy ride.
Jerry McGlothlin serves as the CEO of Special Guests, a publicity agency known for representing guests who are dedicated to helping preserve and advance our Constitutional Republic and maintaining a Judeo-Christian ethic.
Image: Free image, Pixabay license, no attribution required.
Another day and another cartel fighting cartel for territory in Mexico
This is an example of what I'm talking about:
Hundreds of people have fled their homes in southern Mexico as rival cartels fight for control of routes used to smuggle drugs and migrants.Locals described cowering in their homes while bullets flew through their homes during a seven-hour gun fight.More than 700 residents had been displaced from their communities near the Guatemala border, an official said.The Jalisco New Generation cartel (CJNG) is trying to wrest the area from the grip of the Sinaloa cartel.Criminal organisations like the CJNG and the Sinaloa cartel have been infiltrating the region because of its proximity to the border with Guatemala and important transit routes for migrants, whom they extort.The worst-hit communities are Chicomuselo and La Concordia in Chiapas state. Residents of Chicomuselo said 20 people - 18 gang members and two locals - were killed in a cartel battle on 4 January.In a statement, the community described "the pain at seeing children and youths trembling in fear and getting sick from having to live through these traumatic experiences". They also accused the state of failing to protect them.
Nolte: 66% Concerned Illegal Immigration Creates More Violent Crime
Polling shows that two-thirds of Americans believe illegal immigration “may contribute to the violent crime problem in America.”
Ya think?
His Fraudulency Joe Biden invites millions and millions of unvetted third-world illegals, most of them young, unaccompanied men… What the hell do you expect?
The good news is that most of this violent crime is happening in Democrat-run cities. This means that the people who live in those cities are getting what they voted for, and because this is America, people should get what they vote for. Be happy for them.
Rasmussen Reports polled 1,149 likely voters between March 13, 14, and 17, and found the following…
Only 31 percent said they were not “very” or “not at all” concerned about illegals contributing to violent crime. That is less than half of the 66 percent who are concerned.
The internals are fascinating. Among white people, 64 percent are concerned about the connection between illegal immigration and crime. However, among black people, a whopping 73 percent are worried. And why wouldn’t they be? Black people disproportionately live in the Democrat-run cities that posture as sanctuary cities.
While there is still a lot of denial among Democrats, 51 percent say they are concerned with the connection between illegal immigration and crime, compared to 84 percent of Republicans.
When asked if illegal immigration makes America better or worse, only 14 percent said better. A clear majority of 56 percent said worse.
As far as the Orwellian language wars launched by the left to cloud the debate, 62 percent of those polled prefer the clear language of either “illegal alien” (35 percent) or “illegal immigrant” (27 percent). Only 20 percent chose the stupid “undocumented migrant,” while 12 percent chose the even stupider “asylum seeker.”
Ask yourself…
Who benefits from all these illegals?
Biden opens our back door to millions and millions of people to do what, exactly? Nothing more than create competition for your jobs and your housing. We’re already dealing with a housing shortage, and housing prices are already skyrocketing. So let’s bring in millions more people who need housing. Brilliant. But who benefits? The rich. The property owners, that’s who. Same with the jobs. Who benefits? Only the corporations benefit from those cheaper wages.
Why is Biden importing people who hurt working-class Americans? If you care about people, most especially if you care about Americans getting ahead, working their way out of the working class and into the middle class, you don’t do this. America should be a country that attracts only the brightest, best, and most ambitious from all over the world.
J.D. Vance: Illegal Immigration Robs Americans of Dream of Owning a Home
Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban AffairsJohn Nolte’s debut novel Borrowed Time (Bombardier Books) is available today. You can read an exclusive excerpt here and a review of the novel here.
Nolte: Survey Reveals ‘Only Half of New Yorkers Plan to Stay’ in Democrat-Run City
“Only half of New Yorkers plan to stay in the city, according to the survey of more than 6,600 New York City households,” reports the far-left New York Times.
But-but-but His Fraudulency Joe Biden received 76 percent of the New York City vote in 2020???
But-but-but Democrat Eric Adams received 66 percent of the New York City mayoral vote in 2021???
Why’s everyone so unhappy in New York City when they are getting exactly what they voted for?
Oh, but unhappy these Democrats are, especially compared to seven years ago.
“Only 39 percent are content with the state of public education,” reports the Times. “Only 37 percent are happy with the level of public safety in their neighborhood, and only 34 percent are satisfied with their neighborhood’s cleanliness.”
“Less than a third rate the city’s quality of life as excellent or good. Less than a quarter are content with the overall quality of government services.”
When asked, “How would you rate the quality of life in New York City overall?” only 29.8 percent said “excellent” or “good.” That’s down from 51.2 percent in 2017 and 50.9 percent in 2008.
As you can imagine, safety is a major issue. When asked to “rate how safe or unsafe you feel … riding a subway during the day,” only 49 percent said they felt safe during the day. The day! That is a catastrophic drop from 82 percent in 2017 and 86 percent in 2008.
WATCH: Man Throws Flaming Newspaper at School Kids at NYC Subway
When asked to “rate how safe or unsafe you feel … riding a subway at night,” only 22 percent said they felt safe, compared to 46 percent in 2017 and 45 percent in 2008.
When asked to “rate how safe or unsafe you feel … walking alone on a street in your neighborhood at night,” only 51 percent felt safe, down from 70 percent in 2017 and 69 percent in 2008.
WATCH: Man Attacks Unsuspecting Victim from Behind with Baseball Bat in NYC
NYPDGuess what’s getting the blame…? Yep, the pandemic:
“The drop is stark,” said Andrew Rein, president of the Citizens Budget Commission, even as he stressed that context matters. In 2017, New York City was “seven years into a really robust recovery,” he said. In 2023, New York City was still emerging from a pandemic that brought economic and social upheaval.
Is the coronavirus like a zombie that turns people into criminals?
To its credit, the Times does at least mention that crime might sortakindamightprobablybe a bit of an issue:
Of particular note were New Yorkers’ feelings about crime. There were more murders, robberies, felony assaults, burglaries and grand larcenies last year than in 2019, before the pandemic began, and the survey questions reflected a marked unease in how people felt riding the subway or walking the streets at night.
The same Democrats complaining about this voted for this. They voted to end stop-and-frisk. They voted for politicians who declared New York a sanctuary for illegal aliens. They voted to release violent criminals. And now they are all, Ohnoes, our city sucks. How could this have happened?
WATCH — I Thought This Was America?! Alleged Migrants Beat NYPD Officers
NYPD / BODY CAMS+ /TMXAnd now half of them want to leave.
Idiots.
Sure glad I live here.
John Nolte’s debut novel Borrowed Time (Bombardier Books) is available today. You can read an exclusive excerpt here and a review of the novel here.
No comments:
Post a Comment