An executive order signed by President Joe Biden has focused on registering convicts to vote and exclusively involved left-wing non-governmental organizations (NGOs), an investigation from the Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project revealed. (HERITAGE FOUNDATION IS LA RAZA FASCIST FRONT NOW CALLING ITSELF UNIDOus - see below list)
CUT AND PASTE YOUTUBE LINKS
Victor Davis Hanson: Biden is the most dangerously radical President in US history
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jdkca09EHRI&t=772s
I can no longer remain in today’s Democratic Party that is now under the complete control of an elitist cabal of warmongers driven by cowardly wokeness, who divide us by racializing every issue and stoke anti-white racism, actively work to undermine our God-given freedoms, are hostile to people of faith and spirituality, demonize the police, and protect criminals at the expense of law-abiding Americans, believe in open borders, weaponize the national security state to go after political opponents, and above all, dragging us ever closer to undeclared nuclear war REP. TULSI GABBARD
JOE BIDEN is known as a serial liar, a "public servant" who has somehow managed to accrue tremendous wealth, a race-baiting opportunist, a Catholic-in-name-only, and a bought-and-paid-for politician in bed with criminal cartels and foreign foes. In another era, Joe Biden would have been run out of his country much the same way Benedict Arnold was two and a half centuries ago; in an era when integrity, honor, fortitude, fidelity, and grit have been jettisoned for immorality, unscrupulousness, weakness, betrayal, and craven pliability, however, he is elevated to king sleazeball in a city drowning in sleaze. JB SHURK
Investigation: Biden Executive Order Focuses on Registering Convicts to Vote
An executive order signed by President Joe Biden has focused on registering convicts to vote and exclusively involved left-wing non-governmental organizations (NGOs), an investigation from the Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project revealed.
In March 2021, Biden signed an executive order titled “Promoting Access to Voting,” which he billed as a “nonpartisan” government-wide effort to “expand citizens’ opportunities to register to vote and to obtain information about, and participate in, the electoral process.”
Two months after the order was signed, the Biden administration held a “Listening Session” with several NGOs — all of which identified with the Democrat party or left-wing policy initiatives, according to an analysis from the Oversight Project.
The NGOs involved in the Listening Session were:
Documents via the Oversight Project
Likewise, the Oversight Project obtained unredacted notes from the Listening Session which revealed a heavy focus on registering convicts to vote.
In one particular note, an official with the Sentencing Project mentioned the importance of having the Bureau of Prisons notify “newly eligible voters of their right to vote.” That official also suggested that “felony disenfranchisement is voter suppression.”
Another official with the Campaign Legal Center said they want to see the Bureau of Prisons implement a voter registration system that informs convicts of their right to vote after they are released from prison.
Documents via The Oversight Project
Documents via the Oversight Project
Other notes from the Listening Session focused on making it easier for immigrants, presumably newly naturalized citizens, to get onto the nation’s voter rolls.
An official with MALDEF said, “Immigrants and noncitizens — we support voter registration efforts. We want to make sure that they are done in a careful way. All [federal] employees must be trained in this. Need to trust people are acting in bounds of the law. Especially when there are language issues.”
Another official with Asian Americans Advancing Justice said “voter registration info” should be “mandatory at naturalization ceremonies” and the government’s official website for voter registration should be translated into many languages.
In its memo, executives with the Oversight Project called Biden’s executive order “a partisan voter mobilization effort” that seeks to “influence the outcome of future elections through the use of federal resources, infrastructure, and reach.”
John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Email him at jbinder@breitbart.com. Follow him on Twitter here.
WE CAN'T SAVE AMERICA UNTIL WE PUT BIDEN IN PRISON
video: mayorkas urges illegals to vote for biden
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxfjL3BkYes
Established by the White House in 1987, the Hispanic Heritage Foundation (HHF) is an award-winning nonprofit that identifies, inspires, prepares and positions Latino leaders in the classroom, community and workforce to meet America's priorities.
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas was grilled by Rep. Dan Bishop (R-NC) during a hearing over an alleged flyer that the Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project claims asks migrants to vote for President Joe Biden in November.
IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT JOE BIDEN'S PRESIDENTIAL TRANSITION TEAM INCLUDED FORMER LA RAZA V.P. CECEILA MUNOZ WHO WAS FUNDED AND WORKED IN THE OBAMA WHITE HOUSE.
IT SHOULD ALSO BE NOTED THAT FORMER A.G. OF MEXIFORNIA, NOW WITH THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION, IS LONG ASSOCIATED WITH LA RAZA AND THE MEX FASCIST SEPARATIST MOVEMENT OF M.E.Ch.A. (see below)
BARACK OBAMA, JOE BIDEN and ERIC HOLDER’S SABOTAGE OF HOMELAND SECURITY: The “zero tolerance” program was dismantled by Attorney General Erc Holder once it had successfully cut the transit of migrants by roughly 95 percent. Initially, officials made 140,000 arrests per year in the mid-2000s, but the northward flow dropped so much that officials only had to make 6,000 arrests in 2013, according to a 2014 letter by two pro-migration Senators, Sen. Jeff Flake and John McCain. NEIL MUNRO
It’s time to reprise a 2003 warning by Democratic former Colorado governor Dick Lamm about a “secret plan” that is destroying our country through the combined effects of unchecked immigration, the “diversity” agenda and abandoning our national principle of “out of many, one.” This lunacy must end.
. . .
THE U.S. TAX DOLLAR SUPPORTED MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA “The Race” IS NOW CALLING ITSELF UNIDOSus.
IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT JOE BIDEN'S PRESIDENTIAL TRANSITION TEAM INCLUDED FORMER LA RAZA V.P. CECEILA MUNOZ WHO WAS FUNDED AND WORKED IN THE OBAMA WHITE HOUSE.
IT SHOULD ALSO BE NOTED THAT FORMER A.G. OF MEXIFORNIA, NOW WITH THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION, IS LONG ASSOCIATED WITH LA RAZA AND THE MEX FASCIST SEPARATIST MOVEMENT OF M.E.Ch.A. (see below)
BARACK OBAMA, JOE BIDEN and ERIC HOLDER’S SABOTAGE OF HOMELAND SECURITY: The “zero tolerance” program was dismantled by Attorney General Erc Holder once it had successfully cut the transit of migrants by roughly 95 percent. Initially, officials made 140,000 arrests per year in the mid-2000s, but the northward flow dropped so much that officials only had to make 6,000 arrests in 2013, according to a 2014 letter by two pro-migration Senators, Sen. Jeff Flake and John McCain. NEIL MUNRO
It’s time to reprise a 2003 warning by Democratic former Colorado governor Dick Lamm about a “secret plan” that is destroying our country through the combined effects of unchecked immigration, the “diversity” agenda and abandoning our national principle of “out of many, one.” This lunacy must end.
. . .
THE U.S. TAX DOLLAR SUPPORTED MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA “The Race” IS NOW CALLING ITSELF UNIDOSus.
La Raza Founder РKill the Gringos (Jos̩ Angel Guti̩rrez)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5_u62dhkjQ
Obama Funds the Mexican Fascist Party of LA RAZA “The Race”
FIFTEEN THINGS YOU SHOULD KNOW
ABOUT LA RAZA “THE RACE”
by Michelle Malkin
Only in America could critics of a group called "The Race" be labeled racists. Such is the triumph of left-wing identity chauvinists, whose aggressive activists and supine abettors have succeeded in redefining all opposition as "hate."
Both Barack Obama and John McCain will speak this week in San Diego at the annual conference of the National Council of La Raza, the Latino organization whose name is Spanish for, yes, "The Race." Can you imagine Obama and McCain paying homage to a group of white people who called themselves that? No matter. The presidential candidates and the media have legitimized "The Race" as a mainstream ethnic lobbying group and marginalized its critics as intolerant bigots. The unvarnished truth is that the group is a radical ethnic nationalist outfit that abuses your tax dollars and milks PC politics to undermine our sovereignty.
Here are 15 things you should know about "The Race":
15. "The Race" supports driver's licenses for illegal aliens.
14."The Race" demands in-state tuition discounts for illegal alien students that are not available to law-abiding U.S. citizens and law-abiding legal immigrants.
13. "The Race" vehemently opposes cooperative immigration enforcement efforts between local, state and federal authorities.
12. "The Race" opposes a secure fence on the southern border.
11. "The Race" joined the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee in a failed lawsuit attempt to prevent the feds from entering immigration information into a key national crime database -- and to prevent local police officers from accessing the data.
10. "The Race" opposed the state of Oklahoma's tough immigration-enforcement-first laws, which cut off welfare to illegal aliens, put teeth in employer sanctions and strengthened local-federal cooperation and information sharing.
9. "The Race" joined other open-borders, anti-assimilationists and sued to prevent Proposition 227, California's bilingual education reform ballot initiative, from becoming law.
8. "The Race" bitterly protested common-sense voter ID provisions as an "absolute disgrace."
7. "The Race" has consistently opposed post-9/11 national security measures at every turn.
6. Former "Race" president Raul Yzaguirre, Hillary Clinton's Hispanic outreach adviser, said this: "U.S. English is to Hispanics as the Ku Klux Klan is to blacks." He was referring to U.S. English, the nation's oldest, largest citizens' action group dedicated to preserving the unifying role of the English language in the United States. "The Race" also pioneered Orwellian open-borders Newspeak and advised the Mexican government on how to lobby for illegal alien amnesty while avoiding the terms "illegal" and "amnesty."
5. "The Race" gives mainstream cover to a poisonous subset of ideological satellites, led by Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan, or Chicano Student Movement of Aztlan (MEChA). The late GOP Rep. Charlie Norwood rightly characterized the organization as "a radical racist group … one of the most anti-American groups in the country, which has permeated U.S. campuses since the 1960s, and continues its push to carve a racist nation out of the American West."
4. "The Race" is currently leading a smear campaign against staunch immigration enforcement leaders and has called for TV and cable news networks to keep immigration enforcement proponents off the airwaves -- in addition to pushing for Fairness Doctrine policies to shut up their foes. The New York Times reported that current "Race" president Janet Murguia believes "hate speech" should "not be tolerated, even if such censorship were a violation of First Amendment rights."
3. "The Race" sponsors militant ethnic nationalist charter schools subsidized by your public tax dollars (at least $8 million in federal education grants). The schools include Aztlan Academy in Tucson, Ariz., the Mexicayotl Academy in Nogales, Ariz., Academia Cesar Chavez Charter School in St. Paul, Minn., and La Academia Semillas del Pueblo in Los Angeles, whose principal inveighed: "We don't want to drink from a White water fountain, we have our own wells and our natural reservoirs and our way of collecting rain in our aqueducts. We don't need a White water fountain … ultimately the White way, the American way, the neo liberal, capitalist way of life will eventually lead to our own destruction."
2. "The Race" has perfected the art of the PC shakedown at taxpayer expense, pushing relentlessly to lower home loan standards for Hispanic borrowers, reaping millions in federal "mortgage counseling" grants, seeking special multimillion-dollar earmarks and partnering with banks that do business with illegal aliens.
1. "The Race" thrives on ethnic supremacy -- and the elite sheeple's unwillingness to call it what it is. As historian Victor Davis Hanson observes: "[The] organization's very nomenclature 'The National Council of La Raza' is hate speech to the core. Despite all the contortions of the group, Raza (as its Latin cognate suggests) reflects the meaning of 'race' in Spanish, not 'the people' -- and that's precisely why we don't hear of something like 'The National Council of the People,' which would not confer the buzz notion of ethnic, racial and tribal chauvinism."
The fringe is the center. The center is the fringe. Viva La Raza.
THIS FUCKER IS WORSE THAN LA RAZA AND M.E.Ch.A. MEMBER CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL XAVIER BECERRA!
OBAMA APPOINTED Judge whose sister heads La Raza rules 130-year la against encouraging illegal immigrants is unconstitutional
Obama Funds the Mexican Fascist Party of LA RAZA “The Race”
FIFTEEN THINGS YOU SHOULD KNOW
ABOUT LA RAZA “THE RACE”
by Michelle Malkin
Only in America could critics of a group called "The Race" be labeled racists. Such is the triumph of left-wing identity chauvinists, whose aggressive activists and supine abettors have succeeded in redefining all opposition as "hate."
Both Barack Obama and John McCain will speak this week in San Diego at the annual conference of the National Council of La Raza, the Latino organization whose name is Spanish for, yes, "The Race." Can you imagine Obama and McCain paying homage to a group of white people who called themselves that? No matter. The presidential candidates and the media have legitimized "The Race" as a mainstream ethnic lobbying group and marginalized its critics as intolerant bigots. The unvarnished truth is that the group is a radical ethnic nationalist outfit that abuses your tax dollars and milks PC politics to undermine our sovereignty.
Here are 15 things you should know about "The Race":
15. "The Race" supports driver's licenses for illegal aliens.
14."The Race" demands in-state tuition discounts for illegal alien students that are not available to law-abiding U.S. citizens and law-abiding legal immigrants.
13. "The Race" vehemently opposes cooperative immigration enforcement efforts between local, state and federal authorities.
12. "The Race" opposes a secure fence on the southern border.
11. "The Race" joined the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee in a failed lawsuit attempt to prevent the feds from entering immigration information into a key national crime database -- and to prevent local police officers from accessing the data.
10. "The Race" opposed the state of Oklahoma's tough immigration-enforcement-first laws, which cut off welfare to illegal aliens, put teeth in employer sanctions and strengthened local-federal cooperation and information sharing.
9. "The Race" joined other open-borders, anti-assimilationists and sued to prevent Proposition 227, California's bilingual education reform ballot initiative, from becoming law.
8. "The Race" bitterly protested common-sense voter ID provisions as an "absolute disgrace."
7. "The Race" has consistently opposed post-9/11 national security measures at every turn.
6. Former "Race" president Raul Yzaguirre, Hillary Clinton's Hispanic outreach adviser, said this: "U.S. English is to Hispanics as the Ku Klux Klan is to blacks." He was referring to U.S. English, the nation's oldest, largest citizens' action group dedicated to preserving the unifying role of the English language in the United States. "The Race" also pioneered Orwellian open-borders Newspeak and advised the Mexican government on how to lobby for illegal alien amnesty while avoiding the terms "illegal" and "amnesty."
5. "The Race" gives mainstream cover to a poisonous subset of ideological satellites, led by Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan, or Chicano Student Movement of Aztlan (MEChA). The late GOP Rep. Charlie Norwood rightly characterized the organization as "a radical racist group … one of the most anti-American groups in the country, which has permeated U.S. campuses since the 1960s, and continues its push to carve a racist nation out of the American West."
4. "The Race" is currently leading a smear campaign against staunch immigration enforcement leaders and has called for TV and cable news networks to keep immigration enforcement proponents off the airwaves -- in addition to pushing for Fairness Doctrine policies to shut up their foes. The New York Times reported that current "Race" president Janet Murguia believes "hate speech" should "not be tolerated, even if such censorship were a violation of First Amendment rights."
3. "The Race" sponsors militant ethnic nationalist charter schools subsidized by your public tax dollars (at least $8 million in federal education grants). The schools include Aztlan Academy in Tucson, Ariz., the Mexicayotl Academy in Nogales, Ariz., Academia Cesar Chavez Charter School in St. Paul, Minn., and La Academia Semillas del Pueblo in Los Angeles, whose principal inveighed: "We don't want to drink from a White water fountain, we have our own wells and our natural reservoirs and our way of collecting rain in our aqueducts. We don't need a White water fountain … ultimately the White way, the American way, the neo liberal, capitalist way of life will eventually lead to our own destruction."
2. "The Race" has perfected the art of the PC shakedown at taxpayer expense, pushing relentlessly to lower home loan standards for Hispanic borrowers, reaping millions in federal "mortgage counseling" grants, seeking special multimillion-dollar earmarks and partnering with banks that do business with illegal aliens.
1. "The Race" thrives on ethnic supremacy -- and the elite sheeple's unwillingness to call it what it is. As historian Victor Davis Hanson observes: "[The] organization's very nomenclature 'The National Council of La Raza' is hate speech to the core. Despite all the contortions of the group, Raza (as its Latin cognate suggests) reflects the meaning of 'race' in Spanish, not 'the people' -- and that's precisely why we don't hear of something like 'The National Council of the People,' which would not confer the buzz notion of ethnic, racial and tribal chauvinism."
The fringe is the center. The center is the fringe. Viva La Raza.
THIS FUCKER IS WORSE THAN LA RAZA AND M.E.Ch.A. MEMBER CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL XAVIER BECERRA!
OBAMA APPOINTED Judge whose sister heads La Raza rules 130-year la against encouraging illegal immigrants is unconstitutional
https://www.conservativereview.com/news/judge-whose-sister-heads-la-raza-rules-130-year-law-encouraging-illegal-immigrants-unconstitutional/
Imagine if Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez or Rashida Tlaib got to single-handedly veto sovereignty legislation dating back to the 1880s just like a president could veto a new bill passed by Congress this session. Imagine if they could unilaterally abolish ICE and declare open borders, except, unlike a president, they wouldn’t have to stand for re-election. Well, that is exactly the situation this week with a single federal judge. Thanks to Republicans agreeing to the notion that judges – even lower court judges – have direct veto power over legislation, a foundational immigration law has just been “vetoed.”
KCUR-FM reports that on Wednesday, Judge Carlos Murguia of the U.S. District Court of Kansas ruled, based on a Ninth Circuit opinion, that 8 U.S.C. §1324, the law prohibiting someone from “encouraging” or “inducing” illegal immigration, is an unconstitutional infringement upon the First Amendment. In doing so, Murguia vacated the convictions of two illegal aliens, Jose Felipe Hernandez-Calvillo and Mauro Papalotzi, who were convicted in August 2018 by a jury for conspiring to encourage illegal aliens to remain here through employment at a drywall company in Lawrence, Kansas. Four others were originally indicted by a grand jury in 2015.
This law has been on the books in some form for over 130 years, and numerous federal courts have upheld convictions based on §1324. Yet one judge, who worked for an open-borders group named El Centro Inc. and whose sister Janet Murguia is president of La Raza (now called UnidosUS), suddenly thinks conspiring to harbor and encourage illegal immigration violates the First Amendment. Carlos’ sister Mary (who is an identical twin to Janet) is a federal judge on the very Ninth Circuit Court from which he drew this opinion. Judge Mary Murguia once recused herself from a trial involving pro-enforcement Sheriff Joe Arpaio because of her sister’s leadership of La Raza. Carlos should have done the same thing this week in this case, which involves a law that directly conflicts with the work with the open-borders groups his family is associated with.
Rather than rule based on the law, he decided to adopt the ruling of the Ninth Circuit (which doesn’t have jurisdiction in Kansas), which ruled last December that §1324 is “unconstitutionally overbroad” because it “criminalizes a substantial amount of protected expression.” “The court adopts (the 9th Circuit’s) analysis in full and agrees that (the law) on its face is overbroad under the First Amendment,” said Murguia in a brief bench ruling first reported by KCUR-FM.
This assertion is ridiculous, because the law clearly refers to engaging in subversive and fraudulent activities to encourage or enable actual individual aliens to remain in the country, not mere political advocacy for liberal immigration policies in the abstract. It’s like saying that someone who hates high taxes or gun control laws and advocates against them is the same as a person who actively assists tax cheats and gun felons in achieving the end goal of the criminalized behavior.
The 1952 INA (8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv)) calls for felony prosecution for anyone who “encourages or induces an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law.” Subsection (V)(I) prohibits “any conspiracy to commit any of the preceding acts.” The two defendants in this case were convicted on both counts. This law passed the Senate unanimously!
The forerunners to this law were the Contract Labor Law of 1885 and the 1891 Immigration Act. The 1885 law made it unlawful to “in any way assist or encourage the importation or migration of any alien” for the purpose of contract labor. Section 3 of the 1891 Immigration Act made it a felony to “assist or encourage the importation or migration of any alien by promise of employment” through advertisements.
Other circuits have long recognized this law as completely legitimate. “Harboring, within the meaning of §1324, encompasses conduct tending substantially to facilitate an alien’s remaining in the United States illegally and to prevent government authorities from detecting his unlawful presence,” wrote the Second Circuit in 1999. “Such facilitation may be attempted through a wide range of conduct.” (United States v. Kim, 193 F.3d 567, 574 (2d Cir. 1999).) The Fifth Circuit has ruled that Congress intended for §1324 to “broadly proscribe any knowing or willful conduct fairly within any of these terms that tends to substantially facilitate an alien’s remaining in the U.S. illegally.”
So how could a single judge who has a family history of open-borders activism be allowed to veto such long-standing and universal laws? The answer is that he has no such power other than what the other branches are willing to cede him.
The concern here is that this will not only protect employers who knowingly help illegal aliens get around our immigration laws, but it will also essentially legalize sanctuary cities. Throughout the county, sanctuary cities are taking active steps to thwart immigration law. We would never tolerate this for other federal laws concerning American criminals. Why should illegal aliens have special privileges?
Rather than shirking from §1324 prosecutions, Trump’s DOJ should aggressively go after sanctuary cities, especially in areas where there are saner federal judges. A judge has no power to “strike down” or veto statutes he or she believes are overly broad. If there is a case that concerns pure speech or advocacy without any conspiracy or action taken to encourage illegal immigration, then it is within the prerogative of a judge not to convict the person. That is judicial power. But judges have no ability to say that the statute can’t be applied even when an action is involved because, in their view, the text of the law might rope in speech in other cases. To believe otherwise is to concoct an entirely new level of judicial veto that our Founders explicitly rejected. This is the difference between judicial review and judicial supremacy.
Finally, it’s important to remember that this is yet another example of judges attempting to fully nullify long-standing immigration law. Some on the Right believe that Congress needs to pass new laws in order to end illegal immigration. It’s simply not true. We don’t have a law problem; we have a judicial supremacy problem. The only question is whether the other branches will give this fake power full effect.
Kamala Harris Urges
Illegal Migrants to Help Elect Joe Biden
NEIL MUNROSen. Kamala Harris
promised Sunday to reduce detention space for migrants as she asked an illegal
immigrant activist to help Joe Biden win the election.
“I’m undocumented … I
can’t vote …What can we do during this election to help make sure that we get
you elected?” asked Astrid Silva, who was brought into
the United States as a child by her illegal migrant parents.
“You can tell people who
can vote what life is like for you now, and what life can be like,” Vice
President nominee Harris told the Nevada-based political organizer who runs the
pro-amnesty Dream Big Nevada group, adding that:
We are committed to
shutting down private detention centers and ending policies that have been
about separating children from their parents at the border.
Harris’s comments may be
a coded message to would-be illegal migrants and their supportive
legal-immigrant relatives.
For example, if
implemented, Harris’s promise to start “shutting down private detention
centers” could cripple border enforcement. If the enforcement agency does not
have commercial prisons to hold detainees prior to their asylum hearings, the
agency would be forced to release waves of job-seeking migrants into the U.S.
labor market.
Similarly, Harris’s
promise to end “policies … about separating children” echoes the
media-magnified demand by pro-migration activists that officials release
migrant mothers and children when they cross the border. That demand would let
migrant families freely travel to relatives — including their illegal
migrant husbands and fathers — who are working illegally in the United States.
Last week in Nevada, I caught up with my friend @Astrid_NV, to discuss the Biden-Harris plan for immigration reform and how Dreamers
can make a difference in this election.
If you're eligible to
vote, show up at the ballot box for those who can't: https://t.co/VbrfuqVy9P. pic.twitter.com/knU2qFSYmn
— Kamala Harris
(@KamalaHarris) November 1, 2020
Like Biden, Harris pushed the Cold
War “Nation of Immigrants” claim, even though only about 10 percent of people
in the United States are legal immigrants:
We want to have a
president who understands we are a nation of immigrants. This is a country that
was built and that has derived its strength from immigrants coming here over
the generations.
Harris also tried to blur
the legal and civic differences between illegal migrants, legal immigrants, and
American citizens. For example, she told Silva:
Define who you are, and
you tell the world who you are. Don’t let anybody ever put you in a box because
they have a limited perspective on who can do what and who can be one.
[…]
We are all in this
together. And so, chin up, shoulders back, right? We speak our truth and know
that there will always be people applauding and supporting that even if you
can’t see them at that one moment, know that there are so many of us who are
supporting your leadership and the power of your voice. It’s really important.
Harris also claimed
President Donald Trump vilified immigrants: “We’ve seen under the current
president the kind of vitriol, the kind of hate, the vilification of immigrants
in such a horrible way.”
But a Washington Post poll showed in April that Latinos are
the strongest advocates for a near-total
halt to legal immigration during the coronavirus epidemic and economic crash.
Biden’s
2020 plan promises to “reassert
America’s commitment to asylum-seekers and refugees,” wipe out Trump’s asylum
reforms, bar any deportations for 100 days, and end migration enforcement against illegal
aliens unless they commit a felony.
Joe Biden’s asylum and open-border policies will destroy the American
middle class by releasing millions of foreign migrants into the United States,
Stephen Miller told reporters October 28. https://t.co/BaeLSIud7y
— Breitbart News
(@BreitbartNews) October 28, 2020
Biden also wants
to let companies import more visa workers,
let mayors import temporary workers,
and allow an unlimited flow of foreign graduates through U.S. universities into
white-collar jobs. Biden would “exempt from any
cap [the] recent graduates of Ph.D. programs in STEM fields.”
Biden also wants to accelerate the inflow of chain
migration migrants and dramatically accelerate the inflow of poor
refugees to at least 125,000 per year.
“The influx of low wage
workers from all across the world will drive down incomes, drive down wages,
deplete the middle class, bankrupt Social Security, bankrupt Medicare, bankrupt
Medicaid, bankrupt federal entitlements, overcrowd schools, and overcrowd every
hospital in the middle of a pandemic,” White House aide Stephen Miller told reporters on
October 28.
“It is an assault on
reason, it is an assault on law enforcement, and it’s an assault on the very
idea of having a country, having a Republic,” Miller added. “This is not about
left or right or Center. This is about between having a country, or not even having
a country.”
video: mayorkas urges illegals to vote
for biden
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxfjL3BkYes
Established by the White House in 1987,
the Hispanic Heritage Foundation (HHF) is an award-winning nonprofit that
identifies, inspires, prepares and positions Latino leaders in the classroom,
community and workforce to meet America's priorities.
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary
Alejandro Mayorkas was grilled by Rep. Dan Bishop (R-NC) during a hearing over
an alleged flyer that the Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project claims asks
migrants to vote for President Joe Biden in November.
Elon Musk’s
Twitter Censors ALIPAC Ad on Documentation of Noncitizen Voters Citing ‘Hate
Speech’
13
Jaap
Arriens/NurPhoto via Getty Images
25 Apr 2024
3:26
Americans For Legal Immigration PAC (ALIPAC) has withdrawn
support for Elon Musk’s X/Twitter after the platform censored its ad promoting
a new website and forum section aimed at documenting noncitizen and illegal
migrant voters.
On April 17, ALIPAC launched a press release announcing the creation of NonCitizenVoters.com, a website
dedicated to collecting documentation of noncitizen and illegal migrant voters.
The purpose of the site is to assist media, lawmakers, candidates, and voters
in addressing this acknowledged national issue. However, the X/Twitter ad
promoting the press release and information, which quickly gained 44,000 views,
was censored and halted by Elon Musk’s company.
LUKEVILLE, ARIZONA – DECEMBER
07: Immigrants from the west African nation of Guinea strike a celebratory pose
after successfully crossing the U.S.-Mexico border on December 07, 2023 in
Lukeville, Arizona. (Photo by John Moore/Getty Images)
Elon Musk (Slaven Vlasic
/Getty)
William Gheen, spokesman for ALIPAC,
said in a post: “Today we are releasing
Twitter’s emails to us declaring that felony-committing noncitizen and illegal
migrant voters are a ‘protected group’ on X and promoting documentation and
sources proving we have a system-wide problem with this form of election fraud
is considered ‘hate speech / hateful content’ which they will block!”
The release and post was flooded
by comments on both X/Twitter and Facebook, claiming that anyone concerned
about the issue of illegal migrant voters was lying and a racist. ALIPAC
notified a national network of activists and encouraged them to respond to the
trolls with links and source citations.
ALIPAC believes that many of the commenters are online trolls,
referring to them as “China Trolls” or “Laughing Trolls.” According to ALIPAC,
these trolls are hired by unknown paymasters and attack people in groups, use
the same language, and target accounts that have low visibility and are
shadowbanned, such as @ALIPAC. These trolls also appear to have a poor
understanding of basic English and the issues at hand, according to ALIPAC.
They respond very quickly to certain content, which suggests that they are
searching platforms to find targeted content about immigration, Ukraine, and
other related topics.
When ALIPAC contested the censorship of their ad by X/Twitter
and inquired why it was censored, Twitter initially stated: “Our team manually
reviewed your content and confirmed that it violates our Hateful Content
policy…Hate speech or advocacy against a protected group, individual, or
organization.” However, when asked where it was written that people of many
races violating American election laws and committing felonies by voting as
noncitizens are a protected group, Twitter changed its stance and claimed that
the ad was targeting countries not permitted for advertising Political Content.
ALIPAC, a registered Political
Action Committee, responded by citing a recent article in the Guardian stating that Twitter allows U.S. political candidates and
parties to advertise. They asked for clarification on whether the current
Twitter / X Political Content Policy prohibits their political advertising in
the United States or if a change needs to be made to allow their ads to run
only in the United States.
Twitter did not respond and instead reiterated their claim that
the ad violates their “Hate Speech” rules.
Read more at ALIPAC here.
Lucas Nolan is a reporter for
Breitbart News covering issues of free speech and online censorship.
DEMOCRAT PARTY
NEO-FASCISM: FIRST BLOCK FREE SPEECH UNDER THE GUISE OF 'MISINFORMATION'
Here is the problem in a nutshell. Most Democrat voters
don't realize that leftist idealogues have hijacked
the Democrat party,
actively pushing traditional Democrat politicians out. They don't yet
understand that the Democrat party they knew doesn't exist anymore. Almost all of the major news organizations work together to lie
to Democrat voters and feed them misinformation constantly. Corrupted
government entities like the FBI and the DOJ, and the leftists running all
social media, have worked together to censor and silence any dissenting
voices. The goal is to
create a false reality in the eyes of Democrat voters and shield them from the
truth. This is vital to ensure their continued support on Election
Day.
IAN MacCONNELL
Imagine if Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez or Rashida Tlaib got to single-handedly veto sovereignty legislation dating back to the 1880s just like a president could veto a new bill passed by Congress this session. Imagine if they could unilaterally abolish ICE and declare open borders, except, unlike a president, they wouldn’t have to stand for re-election. Well, that is exactly the situation this week with a single federal judge. Thanks to Republicans agreeing to the notion that judges – even lower court judges – have direct veto power over legislation, a foundational immigration law has just been “vetoed.”
KCUR-FM reports that on Wednesday, Judge Carlos Murguia of the U.S. District Court of Kansas ruled, based on a Ninth Circuit opinion, that 8 U.S.C. §1324, the law prohibiting someone from “encouraging” or “inducing” illegal immigration, is an unconstitutional infringement upon the First Amendment. In doing so, Murguia vacated the convictions of two illegal aliens, Jose Felipe Hernandez-Calvillo and Mauro Papalotzi, who were convicted in August 2018 by a jury for conspiring to encourage illegal aliens to remain here through employment at a drywall company in Lawrence, Kansas. Four others were originally indicted by a grand jury in 2015.
This law has been on the books in some form for over 130 years, and numerous federal courts have upheld convictions based on §1324. Yet one judge, who worked for an open-borders group named El Centro Inc. and whose sister Janet Murguia is president of La Raza (now called UnidosUS), suddenly thinks conspiring to harbor and encourage illegal immigration violates the First Amendment. Carlos’ sister Mary (who is an identical twin to Janet) is a federal judge on the very Ninth Circuit Court from which he drew this opinion. Judge Mary Murguia once recused herself from a trial involving pro-enforcement Sheriff Joe Arpaio because of her sister’s leadership of La Raza. Carlos should have done the same thing this week in this case, which involves a law that directly conflicts with the work with the open-borders groups his family is associated with.
Rather than rule based on the law, he decided to adopt the ruling of the Ninth Circuit (which doesn’t have jurisdiction in Kansas), which ruled last December that §1324 is “unconstitutionally overbroad” because it “criminalizes a substantial amount of protected expression.” “The court adopts (the 9th Circuit’s) analysis in full and agrees that (the law) on its face is overbroad under the First Amendment,” said Murguia in a brief bench ruling first reported by KCUR-FM.
This assertion is ridiculous, because the law clearly refers to engaging in subversive and fraudulent activities to encourage or enable actual individual aliens to remain in the country, not mere political advocacy for liberal immigration policies in the abstract. It’s like saying that someone who hates high taxes or gun control laws and advocates against them is the same as a person who actively assists tax cheats and gun felons in achieving the end goal of the criminalized behavior.
The 1952 INA (8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv)) calls for felony prosecution for anyone who “encourages or induces an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law.” Subsection (V)(I) prohibits “any conspiracy to commit any of the preceding acts.” The two defendants in this case were convicted on both counts. This law passed the Senate unanimously!
The forerunners to this law were the Contract Labor Law of 1885 and the 1891 Immigration Act. The 1885 law made it unlawful to “in any way assist or encourage the importation or migration of any alien” for the purpose of contract labor. Section 3 of the 1891 Immigration Act made it a felony to “assist or encourage the importation or migration of any alien by promise of employment” through advertisements.
Other circuits have long recognized this law as completely legitimate. “Harboring, within the meaning of §1324, encompasses conduct tending substantially to facilitate an alien’s remaining in the United States illegally and to prevent government authorities from detecting his unlawful presence,” wrote the Second Circuit in 1999. “Such facilitation may be attempted through a wide range of conduct.” (United States v. Kim, 193 F.3d 567, 574 (2d Cir. 1999).) The Fifth Circuit has ruled that Congress intended for §1324 to “broadly proscribe any knowing or willful conduct fairly within any of these terms that tends to substantially facilitate an alien’s remaining in the U.S. illegally.”
So how could a single judge who has a family history of open-borders activism be allowed to veto such long-standing and universal laws? The answer is that he has no such power other than what the other branches are willing to cede him.
The concern here is that this will not only protect employers who knowingly help illegal aliens get around our immigration laws, but it will also essentially legalize sanctuary cities. Throughout the county, sanctuary cities are taking active steps to thwart immigration law. We would never tolerate this for other federal laws concerning American criminals. Why should illegal aliens have special privileges?
Rather than shirking from §1324 prosecutions, Trump’s DOJ should aggressively go after sanctuary cities, especially in areas where there are saner federal judges. A judge has no power to “strike down” or veto statutes he or she believes are overly broad. If there is a case that concerns pure speech or advocacy without any conspiracy or action taken to encourage illegal immigration, then it is within the prerogative of a judge not to convict the person. That is judicial power. But judges have no ability to say that the statute can’t be applied even when an action is involved because, in their view, the text of the law might rope in speech in other cases. To believe otherwise is to concoct an entirely new level of judicial veto that our Founders explicitly rejected. This is the difference between judicial review and judicial supremacy.
Finally, it’s important to remember that this is yet another example of judges attempting to fully nullify long-standing immigration law. Some on the Right believe that Congress needs to pass new laws in order to end illegal immigration. It’s simply not true. We don’t have a law problem; we have a judicial supremacy problem. The only question is whether the other branches will give this fake power full effect.
Kamala Harris Urges
Illegal Migrants to Help Elect Joe Biden
NEIL MUNROSen. Kamala Harris
promised Sunday to reduce detention space for migrants as she asked an illegal
immigrant activist to help Joe Biden win the election.
“I’m undocumented … I
can’t vote …What can we do during this election to help make sure that we get
you elected?” asked Astrid Silva, who was brought into
the United States as a child by her illegal migrant parents.
“You can tell people who
can vote what life is like for you now, and what life can be like,” Vice
President nominee Harris told the Nevada-based political organizer who runs the
pro-amnesty Dream Big Nevada group, adding that:
We are committed to
shutting down private detention centers and ending policies that have been
about separating children from their parents at the border.
Harris’s comments may be
a coded message to would-be illegal migrants and their supportive
legal-immigrant relatives.
For example, if
implemented, Harris’s promise to start “shutting down private detention
centers” could cripple border enforcement. If the enforcement agency does not
have commercial prisons to hold detainees prior to their asylum hearings, the
agency would be forced to release waves of job-seeking migrants into the U.S.
labor market.
Similarly, Harris’s
promise to end “policies … about separating children” echoes the
media-magnified demand by pro-migration activists that officials release
migrant mothers and children when they cross the border. That demand would let
migrant families freely travel to relatives — including their illegal
migrant husbands and fathers — who are working illegally in the United States.
Last week in Nevada, I caught up with my friend @Astrid_NV, to discuss the Biden-Harris plan for immigration reform and how Dreamers
can make a difference in this election.
If you're eligible to
vote, show up at the ballot box for those who can't: https://t.co/VbrfuqVy9P. pic.twitter.com/knU2qFSYmn
— Kamala Harris
(@KamalaHarris) November 1, 2020
Like Biden, Harris pushed the Cold
War “Nation of Immigrants” claim, even though only about 10 percent of people
in the United States are legal immigrants:
We want to have a
president who understands we are a nation of immigrants. This is a country that
was built and that has derived its strength from immigrants coming here over
the generations.
Harris also tried to blur
the legal and civic differences between illegal migrants, legal immigrants, and
American citizens. For example, she told Silva:
Define who you are, and
you tell the world who you are. Don’t let anybody ever put you in a box because
they have a limited perspective on who can do what and who can be one.
[…]
We are all in this
together. And so, chin up, shoulders back, right? We speak our truth and know
that there will always be people applauding and supporting that even if you
can’t see them at that one moment, know that there are so many of us who are
supporting your leadership and the power of your voice. It’s really important.
Harris also claimed
President Donald Trump vilified immigrants: “We’ve seen under the current
president the kind of vitriol, the kind of hate, the vilification of immigrants
in such a horrible way.”
But a Washington Post poll showed in April that Latinos are
the strongest advocates for a near-total
halt to legal immigration during the coronavirus epidemic and economic crash.
Biden’s
2020 plan promises to “reassert
America’s commitment to asylum-seekers and refugees,” wipe out Trump’s asylum
reforms, bar any deportations for 100 days, and end migration enforcement against illegal
aliens unless they commit a felony.
Joe Biden’s asylum and open-border policies will destroy the American
middle class by releasing millions of foreign migrants into the United States,
Stephen Miller told reporters October 28. https://t.co/BaeLSIud7y
— Breitbart News
(@BreitbartNews) October 28, 2020
Biden also wants
to let companies import more visa workers,
let mayors import temporary workers,
and allow an unlimited flow of foreign graduates through U.S. universities into
white-collar jobs. Biden would “exempt from any
cap [the] recent graduates of Ph.D. programs in STEM fields.”
Biden also wants to accelerate the inflow of chain
migration migrants and dramatically accelerate the inflow of poor
refugees to at least 125,000 per year.
“The influx of low wage
workers from all across the world will drive down incomes, drive down wages,
deplete the middle class, bankrupt Social Security, bankrupt Medicare, bankrupt
Medicaid, bankrupt federal entitlements, overcrowd schools, and overcrowd every
hospital in the middle of a pandemic,” White House aide Stephen Miller told reporters on
October 28.
“It is an assault on
reason, it is an assault on law enforcement, and it’s an assault on the very
idea of having a country, having a Republic,” Miller added. “This is not about
left or right or Center. This is about between having a country, or not even having
a country.”
video: mayorkas urges illegals to vote
for biden
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxfjL3BkYes
Established by the White House in 1987,
the Hispanic Heritage Foundation (HHF) is an award-winning nonprofit that
identifies, inspires, prepares and positions Latino leaders in the classroom,
community and workforce to meet America's priorities.
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary
Alejandro Mayorkas was grilled by Rep. Dan Bishop (R-NC) during a hearing over
an alleged flyer that the Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project claims asks
migrants to vote for President Joe Biden in November.
Elon Musk’s
Twitter Censors ALIPAC Ad on Documentation of Noncitizen Voters Citing ‘Hate
Speech’
13Jaap
Arriens/NurPhoto via Getty Images
25 Apr 2024
3:26
Americans For Legal Immigration PAC (ALIPAC) has withdrawn
support for Elon Musk’s X/Twitter after the platform censored its ad promoting
a new website and forum section aimed at documenting noncitizen and illegal
migrant voters.
On April 17, ALIPAC launched a press release announcing the creation of NonCitizenVoters.com, a website
dedicated to collecting documentation of noncitizen and illegal migrant voters.
The purpose of the site is to assist media, lawmakers, candidates, and voters
in addressing this acknowledged national issue. However, the X/Twitter ad
promoting the press release and information, which quickly gained 44,000 views,
was censored and halted by Elon Musk’s company.
LUKEVILLE, ARIZONA – DECEMBER
07: Immigrants from the west African nation of Guinea strike a celebratory pose
after successfully crossing the U.S.-Mexico border on December 07, 2023 in
Lukeville, Arizona. (Photo by John Moore/Getty Images)
Elon Musk (Slaven Vlasic
/Getty)
William Gheen, spokesman for ALIPAC,
said in a post: “Today we are releasing
Twitter’s emails to us declaring that felony-committing noncitizen and illegal
migrant voters are a ‘protected group’ on X and promoting documentation and
sources proving we have a system-wide problem with this form of election fraud
is considered ‘hate speech / hateful content’ which they will block!”
The release and post was flooded
by comments on both X/Twitter and Facebook, claiming that anyone concerned
about the issue of illegal migrant voters was lying and a racist. ALIPAC
notified a national network of activists and encouraged them to respond to the
trolls with links and source citations.
ALIPAC believes that many of the commenters are online trolls,
referring to them as “China Trolls” or “Laughing Trolls.” According to ALIPAC,
these trolls are hired by unknown paymasters and attack people in groups, use
the same language, and target accounts that have low visibility and are
shadowbanned, such as @ALIPAC. These trolls also appear to have a poor
understanding of basic English and the issues at hand, according to ALIPAC.
They respond very quickly to certain content, which suggests that they are
searching platforms to find targeted content about immigration, Ukraine, and
other related topics.
When ALIPAC contested the censorship of their ad by X/Twitter
and inquired why it was censored, Twitter initially stated: “Our team manually
reviewed your content and confirmed that it violates our Hateful Content
policy…Hate speech or advocacy against a protected group, individual, or
organization.” However, when asked where it was written that people of many
races violating American election laws and committing felonies by voting as
noncitizens are a protected group, Twitter changed its stance and claimed that
the ad was targeting countries not permitted for advertising Political Content.
ALIPAC, a registered Political
Action Committee, responded by citing a recent article in the Guardian stating that Twitter allows U.S. political candidates and
parties to advertise. They asked for clarification on whether the current
Twitter / X Political Content Policy prohibits their political advertising in
the United States or if a change needs to be made to allow their ads to run
only in the United States.
Twitter did not respond and instead reiterated their claim that
the ad violates their “Hate Speech” rules.
Read more at ALIPAC here.
Lucas Nolan is a reporter for
Breitbart News covering issues of free speech and online censorship.
DEMOCRAT PARTY
NEO-FASCISM: FIRST BLOCK FREE SPEECH UNDER THE GUISE OF 'MISINFORMATION'
Here is the problem in a nutshell. Most Democrat voters
don't realize that leftist idealogues have hijacked
the Democrat party,
actively pushing traditional Democrat politicians out. They don't yet
understand that the Democrat party they knew doesn't exist anymore. Almost all of the major news organizations work together to lie
to Democrat voters and feed them misinformation constantly. Corrupted
government entities like the FBI and the DOJ, and the leftists running all
social media, have worked together to censor and silence any dissenting
voices. The goal is to
create a false reality in the eyes of Democrat voters and shield them from the
truth. This is vital to ensure their continued support on Election
Day.
IAN MacCONNELL
No comments:
Post a Comment