Thursday, January 27, 2011

ED KOCH ON EMPLOYERS ILLEGALLY HIRING ILLEGALS

MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com




NO PRESIDENT IN AMERICAN HISTORY HAS ASSAULTED THE AMERICAN WORKER ON BEHALF OF HIS CORPORATE PAYMASTERS, MORE THAN BARACK OBAMA!

Even with staggering unemployment, Obama’s first priority is keeping wages depressed by assaulting our border security, sabotaging e-verify, and sending messages to the employers of illegals that NO LAW AGAINST HIRING ILLEGALS WILL BE ENFORCED. Have there been???



*

FORMER NYC MAYOR, ED KOCH:



“On one side of this contentious issue are those who believe as I do that the Obama administration has exactly the same goal as its predecessor, the Bush administration, which is to provide amnesty and a "path to citizenship" for our illegal alien population, now estimated at between 11 million and 20 million.” (MOST NON-GOV LA RAZA PROPAGANDA PUT THE REAL NUMBER OF ILLEGALS IN THIS NATION AT ABOUT 40 MILLION! IF THAT SOUNDS TOO HIGH, SIMPLY COME TO MEXIFORNIA AND SEE FOR YOURSELF ABOUT 20 MILLION!)



*

THERE ARE ONLY EIGHT (8) STATE WITH A POPULATION GREATER THAN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, WHERE HALF THOSE WITH A JOB ARE ILLEGALS USING STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS. THIS SAME COUNTY PAYS OUT $600 MILLION A YEAR IN WELFARE TO ILLEGALS, AND HAS THE HIGHEST RATE OF MEX GANG RELATED MURDER IN THE COUNTRY. MORE MURDER BY ILLEGALS THAN ANY E.U. COUNTRY!

NO ONE HAS HEARD OF AN EMPLOYER OF ILLEGALS BEING PROSECUTED!

LA RAZA FEINSTEIN HAS LONG HIRED ILLEGALS AT HER S.F. HOTEL, AND LA RAZA PELOSI HAS LONG HIRED ILLEGALS AT HER ST. HELENA, NAPA WINERY. PELOSI HAS LONG VOWED THE WALL WILL NEVER BE COMPLETED. OBAMA HAS STOPPED THE CONSTRUCTION.

*

What I and many others urge is a crackdown on American employers who knowingly hire illegals. They usually do so in order to have a docile workforce that is afraid of being deported and is therefore fearful of complaining about workplace conditions and illegal, below-minimum-wage salaries. If such employers were prosecuted and upon conviction received prison sentences, even as low as six months to one year, I believe the message would hugely deter future such breaches in the law. White collar criminals -- predator employers -- don't fear civil penalties and fines -- the cost of doing business -- as much as they fear serving time behind bars. Were the jobs to disappear, I believe that illegal aliens, many here to work and send much of their paychecks back to their families in Mexico and elsewhere, would go home.

*



http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ed-koch/an-overriding-november-el_b_667968.html



Ed Koch

Former Mayor, New York City

Posted: August 2, 2010 05:37 PM

An Overriding November Election Issue: Amnesty for Illegal Aliens

Immigration is the issue that will dominate the November elections.

On one side of this contentious issue are those who believe as I do that the Obama administration has exactly the same goal as its predecessor, the Bush administration, which is to provide amnesty and a "path to citizenship" for our illegal alien population, now estimated at between 11 million and 20 million. Supporters of amnesty often say the alternative is to put millions of aliens into boxcars and send them back to Mexico and other Latin American countries, where most of them are from, creating the Nazi-like and totally unacceptable image of Jews on their way to the crematoria. It is a false argument. No one I know who opposes amnesty supports such an approach.

What I and many others urge is a crackdown on American employers who knowingly hire illegals. They usually do so in order to have a docile workforce that is afraid of being deported and is therefore fearful of complaining about workplace conditions and illegal, below-minimum-wage salaries. If such employers were prosecuted and upon conviction received prison sentences, even as low as six months to one year, I believe the message would hugely deter future such breaches in the law. White collar criminals -- predator employers -- don't fear civil penalties and fines -- the cost of doing business -- as much as they fear serving time behind bars. Were the jobs to disappear, I believe that illegal aliens, many here to work and send much of their paychecks back to their families in Mexico and elsewhere, would go home.

We can also attract illegal aliens to join a going home program by offering to pay their airfare and even offering them a reward of $1,000 or more, payable one year later on proof they had remained in their own country for at least a year after their return. However, if amnesty is provided, we will simply be continuing a failed policy. In 1986 we said there would be no more amnesties after the Simpson-Mazzoli act legalized the status of illegal aliens who were in the country at that time.

We should be compassionate in dealing with individual cases and special categories. The New York Times of August 1st reports,

The Obama administration, responding to requests from Democratic and Republican lawmakers, has taken steps to make it easier for illegal immigrants who are spouses and family members of Americans serving in the military to gain legal status.



(“CHAIN MIGRATION” WHICH WOULD PERMIT 38 MILLION ILLEGALS TO BRING ON UP THE REST OF THEIR FAMILY – WOULD DOUBLE THE ILLEGAL POPULATION!)

I would go further and not limit the program to the military, but apply it to all immediate family members -- brothers, sisters and parents -- of American citizens living in this country as illegal aliens.

There are those who believe the policy of the Obama administration for what they euphemistically call a "comprehensive reform of the immigration laws," which means amnesty for basically all, but not criminals, is predicated on the belief that the amnesty recipients -- overwhelmingly Hispanics -- will vote Democratic in appreciation. That is not a legitimate reason to in effect create a policy of open borders for this country. If open borders became the policy of the United States because the federal government decided it could not actually control our borders, they being so vast -- and President Obama did convey that thought -- we would have a dramatic illustration of what former Senator Patrick Moynihan meant when he coined the phrase "defining deviancy down": if you can't control illegality, legalize it.

The Obama administration should reach out to those who disagree with his amnesty approach and seek to find a compassionate, rational approach to an admittedly vexing problem. The current approach of the Obama administration, which is to bar the efforts of the state of Arizona to control its borders from infiltration by illegals, is deplored by most Americans. A poll taken by CNN on July 27th shows that 55 percent nationally favor the Arizona law recently gutted by a federal district court judge, with 40 percent opposing the law. In Arizona itself, a Rasmussen poll of April 21st shows that 70 percent favor the Arizona law and 23 percent oppose it.

The decision of the federal judge gutting the law is now being appealed. Unless overturned, it applies only to those states in the jurisdiction of the 9th Federal Circuit. It does not mandate the actions of most of the states, those in other circuit court jurisdictions seeking to emulate the Arizona law. Sooner or later, the U.S. Supreme Court will rule on the issue of whether states like Arizona, which are spending billions on health care for illegals, as well as for education of their children - Arizona has an estimated 500,000 illegal immigrants - can take police measures to control its border with Mexico, or must rely on inadequate federal efforts. One such inadequate effort is the President sending 1,200 National Guardsman to the southern borders of our southwestern states, who have no authority to arrest illegals crossing, but can only call on the U.S. Border Patrol to do so when sighting an illegal. That is not exactly a real effort by the Obama administration.

*

HOW MANY GUARDS IS OBAMA SENDING TO THE BORDER AGAIN?



Lou Dobbs Tonight

Monday, September 28, 2009





And T.J. BONNER, president of the National Border Patrol Council, will weigh in on the federal government’s decision to pull nearly 400 agents from the U.S.-Mexican border. As always, Lou will take your calls to discuss the issues that matter most-and to get your thoughts on where America is headed.

*

Lou Dobbs Tonight

And there are some 800,000 gang members in this country: That’s more than the combined number of troops in our Army and Marine Corps. These gangs have become one of the principle ways to import and distribute drugs in the United States. Congressman David Reichert joins Lou to tell us why those gangs are growing larger and stronger, and why he’s introduced legislation to eliminate the top three international drug gangs.

No comments: