Obama Administration Challenges
Arizona E-Verify Law
The
Obama administration has asked the Supreme Court to strike down a 2007 Arizona law that punishes employers who
hire illegal aliens, a law enacted by then-Governor Janet Napolitano. (Solicitor General's Amicus
Curiae Brief).
Called the “Legal Arizona Workers Act,” the law requires all employers in
Arizona to use E-Verify and provides that the business licenses of those who
hire illegal workers shall be repealed. From the date of enactment, the
Chamber of Commerce and other special interest groups have been trying to undo
it, attacking it through a failed ballot initiative and also through a lawsuit.
Now the Chamber is asking the United States Supreme Court to hear the case (Chamber
of Commerce v. Candelaria), and the Obama Administration is weighing in
against the law.
To
date, Arizona’s E-Verify law has been upheld by all lower courts, including the
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Ninth Circuit, in particular, viewed it as
an exercise of a state’s traditional power to regulate businesses. (San Francisco Chronicle, June 2, 2010).
Obama’s Justice Department, however, disagrees. Acting Solicitor General Neal
Katyal said in his filing with the Supreme Court that the lower courts were
wrong to uphold the statute because federal immigration law expressly preempts
any state law imposing sanctions on employers hiring illegal immigrants.
Mr. Katyal argues that this is not a licensing law, but “a statute that
prohibits the hiring of unauthorized aliens and uses suspension and revocation
of all state-issued licenses as its ultimate sanction.” (Solicitor General's Amicus
Curiae Brief,
p. 10). This is the administration’s first court challenge to a state’s
authority to act against illegal immigration, and could be a preview of the
battle brewing over Arizona’s recent illegal immigration crackdown through SB
1070.
Napolitano
has made no comment on the Department of Justice’s decision to challenge the
2007 law, but federal officials said that she has taken an active part in the
debate over whether to do so. (Politico, May 28, 2010).
As Governor of Arizona, Napolitano said she believed the state law was valid
and became a defendant in the many lawsuits against it. (Id.).
*
Obama soft on illegals
enforcement
Arrests of illegal immigrant
workers have dropped precipitously under President Obama, according to figures
released Wednesday. Criminal arrests, administrative arrests, indictments and
convictions of illegal immigrants at work sites all fell by more than 50
percent from fiscal 2008 to fiscal 2009.
The figures show that Mr. Obama has made good on his pledge to shift enforcement away from going after illegal immigrant workers themselves - but at the expense of Americans' jobs, said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, the Republican who compiled the numbers from the Department of Homeland Security's U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE). Mr. Smith, the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, said a period of economic turmoil is the wrong time to be cutting enforcement and letting illegal immigrants take jobs that Americans otherwise would hold.
The figures show that Mr. Obama has made good on his pledge to shift enforcement away from going after illegal immigrant workers themselves - but at the expense of Americans' jobs, said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, the Republican who compiled the numbers from the Department of Homeland Security's U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE). Mr. Smith, the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, said a period of economic turmoil is the wrong time to be cutting enforcement and letting illegal immigrants take jobs that Americans otherwise would hold.
*
Obama Quietly Erasing Borders
(Article)
*
OBAMA PUT A LA RAZA SUPREMACIST IN AS SEC. OF LABOR TO ASSURE ILLEGALS GET
OUR JOBS FIRST!
“Labor
Secretary Hilda Solis, a former California congresswoman with close ties to the
influential La Raza movement, announced the “We Can Help” project with great fanfare a few days ago.”
“Last May, the state defeated
the Chamber of Commerce's suit against the law in the Supreme Court.”
Arizona shows pitfalls in Romney’s proposed national E-Verify program
Romney greets supporters in Chandler, Ariz. (Gerald
Herbert/AP)
At
Wednesday night's GOP debate, Mitt Romney called Arizona a "model"
for immigration enforcement, singling out the state's 2007 law mandating that
all employers use the national E-Verify database when hiring workers. He promised to institute a national
E-Verify law if elected. "You do that,
and just as Arizona is finding out, you can stop illegal immigration,"
he said. Last May, the state defeated
the Chamber of Commerce's suit against the law in the Supreme Court.
Kansas
Secretary of State Kris Kobach, Romney's adviser on immigration issues, helped
write Arizona's E-Verify law as well as Arizona's 2010 SB1070 law (Support Our
Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act). At the recent Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington,
Kobach touted what's happened in Arizona as proof that
"self-deportation"—Romney's chosen immigration strategy—is working.
"People started self-deporting by the tens of thousands," after
E-Verify passed, he said, according to the Hill.
Romney
and Kobach are right that, on at least one level, the law has had a significant
impact in Arizona. A study
published last year by the Public Policy Institute of California shows that
about 92,000, or 17 percent, of the Hispanic non-citizen population of Arizona
left the state in the year after the state passed E-Verify legislation; most of
those who moved were probably illegal immigrants. (THEY
PROBABLY MOVED TO MEXIFORNIA!) PPI researchers told
Yahoo News that the law—not the recession, or highly-publicized raids targeting
illegal immigrants—was the most likely cause of the exodus.
Yet
while PPI's research helps predict what might happen if an E-Verify system were
implemented nationally, as Romney hopes, it exposes some of the less-desirable
side-effects of the law as well. In
Arizona, the non-citizen Hispanic workers who did stay behind increasingly
shifted into a shadow economy, said Magnus Lofstrom, a co-author of the
study. The self-employment rate among non-citizen Hispanics in Arizona nearly
doubled post-E-Verify, and a higher proportion of people who said they were
self-employed lived in poverty and lacked health insurance.
Lofstrom
told Yahoo News that the informal economy would grow significantly nationwide
if a national E-Verify system were established. While illegal immigrants in Arizona were able to move to other states
to find work, their choices would be significantly limited if E-Verify were
implemented nationally; the only real (and unlikely) option would be to for
undocumented workers to move to another country. In other words, we'd be
much more likely to see an increase in informal employment rather than a
massive movement among illegal immigrants to "self-deport."
(RIDDING OURSELVES OF THE
LA RAZA OCCUPIERS WILL NOT BE EASY. THEY’RE VOTING MORE LA RAZA SUPREMACIST
INTO OFFICE EVERY ELECTION! IT WILL BRING A DECLINE IN THE STAGGERING COST OF
THE MEXICAN WELFARE STATE ($600 MILLION PER YEAR IN LA RAZA INFESTED LOS
ANGELES COUNTY ALONE), AND ALSO THE STAGGERING MEXICAN CRIME RATES. ACCORDING
TO CA ATTORNEY GEN. KAMALA HARRIS, HALF OF ALL MURDERS IN CA ARE BY MEXICAN
GANGS! THE CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR CHARACTERIZES CA AS THE “MEXICAN GANG
CAPITAL of AMERICA”.)
What
would that mean? An increase in informal employment among the nation's
estimated 11 million illegal immigrants would result in lower tax
revenues--since non-self employed illegal immigrants are more likely to have
taxes withheld from their paychecks--higher poverty levels among illegal
immigrants, and a higher potential for employer abuse, said Lofstrom. (Right
now, America has a relatively small shadow
economy
compared to other developed countries, like Italy.)
Another
snag with instituting a national E-Verify program is that the current system
cannot detect identity fraud. A 2009 government-commissioned study found that E-Verify only
flags illegal immigrants half the time, because it can't detect when a worker
is using documents that belong to someone else. (Employers enter in Social
Security or alien registration numbers, birthdates and names of employees into
the database, which figures out whether they match the federal immigration and
Social Security databases.) To combat
this fraud, Romney has said he supports biometric ID cards for immigrants that
would contain a fingerprint or other identifying device that clears them for
work. Romney hasn't explicitly said that every person in America should
have this card--an idea that many libertarians
object to.
But without being adopted universally, undocumented people could still use
false documents. (The Romney team had not responded to requests for comment
from Yahoo News by the time this article was published.) Mandatory national ID
cards have played a starring role in failed bipartisan immigration reform
proposals in Congress over the past few years.
In Arizona, there is no
state-wide system to make sure businesses are using E-Verify. Rather,
individual citizens are asked to expose employers that they suspect of hiring
illegal immigrants to their local district attorneys. Yet district attorneys were
not granted the power to subpoena businesses that are suspected of hiring
illegal immigrants, and some DAs have complained that the law is an unfunded
mandate for their offices, according to Judy Gans, immigration policy director
at Arizona University's Udall Center. Only
three businesses were prosecuted under the law in the first three years after
it passed.
But
business owners still worry that E-Verify's high error rate could leave them
open to prosecution. Republicans in Arizona's state Senate are now moving to
change the law at their request. Republican state senator Jerry Lewis, who
defeated anti-illegal immigration hardliner Russell Pearce last year in a historic
recall election, is co-sponsoring a bill with seven other Republican senators
to provide "safe harbor" to businesses that use E-Verify but still
accidentally hire unauthorized workers.
Lewis,
who is backing Romney, told Yahoo News that he is not a fan of Kobach's draft
immigration laws.
"Does
Kobach's presence in Romney's campaign create a difficulty for him? I believe
it does," Lewis said. "I think people want a real solution and I
don't think the legislation that has been drafted by Kobach is a real solution."
Lewis said the immigration laws "polarize people."
Lewis
added that he thinks Romney will eventually agree with him that making all
illegal immigrants leave the country is not a solution to the country's
immigration problems.
"I
think he'll realize that there is a place for a real solution to the issue, and
it's not just let's get everybody that's undocumented out of the country,"
Lewis said.
ARIZONA, UNDER LA RAZA
OCCUPATION, ENDORSES ROMNEY, WHILE THE MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS STILL STAND BEHIND
THEIR MAN OBAMA!
OBAMA HAS SUED THE
AMERICAN PEOPLE OF AZ ON BEHALF OF HIS LA RAZA PARTY BASE OF ILLEGALS, HAS
SABOTAGED E-VERIFY IN AZ, AND MADE BORDER SECURITY A JOKE!
NEXT TO MEXICO CITY,
PHOENIX IS THE CAPITAL OF MEXICAN KIDNAPPING, HOME INVASION, CAR THEFT, AND
GATEWAY FOR THE SOUTHERN INVASION OF THE MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS!
*
PAT
BUCHANAN ON OBAMA’S HISPANDERING FOR THE
ILLEGALS’ VOTES:
What is the response of
Barack Obama, who took an oath to see to it that federal laws are faithfully
executed?
He is siding with the
law-breakers. He is pandering to the ethnic lobbies. He is not berating a
Mexican regime that aids and abets this invasion of the country of which he is
commander in chief. Instead, he attacks the government of Arizona for trying to
fill a gaping hole in law enforcement left by his own dereliction of duty.
*
TOWNHALL.com
Whose
Country Is This? THE MEXICANS KNOW WE ARE A LOOTED COLONY OF NARCOMEX!
Pat Buchanan
Tuesday, April 27, 2010
With the support of 70
percent of its citizens, Arizona has ordered sheriffs and police to secure the
border and remove illegal aliens, half a million of whom now reside there.
Arizona acted because the
U.S. government has abdicated its constitutional duty to protect the states
from invasion and refuses to enforce America's immigration laws.
"We in Arizona have been
more than patient waiting for Washington to act," said Gov. Jan Brewer.
"But decades of inaction and misguided policy have created an unacceptable
situation."
We have a crisis in Arizona
because we have a failed state in Washington.
What
is the response of Barack Obama, who took an oath to see to it that federal
laws are faithfully executed?
He
is siding with the law-breakers. He is pandering to the ethnic lobbies. He is
not berating a Mexican regime that aids and abets this invasion of the country
of which he is commander in chief. Instead, he attacks the government of
Arizona for trying to fill a gaping hole in law enforcement left by his own
dereliction of duty.
He has denounced Arizona as
"misguided." He has called on the Justice Department to ensure that
Arizona's sheriffs and police do not violate anyone's civil rights. But he has
said nothing about the rights of the people of Arizona who must deal with the
costs of having hundreds of thousands of lawbreakers in their midst.
How's that for Andrew
Jackson-style leadership?
Obama has done everything but
his duty to enforce the law.
Undeniably, making it a state
as well as a federal crime to be in this country illegally, and requiring
police to check the immigration status of anyone they have a "reasonable
suspicion" is here illegally, is tough and burdensome. But what choice did
Arizona have?
The state has a fiscal crisis
caused in part by the burden of providing schooling and social welfare for
illegals and their families, who consume far more in services than they pay in
taxes and who continue to pour in. Even John McCain is now calling for 3,000
troops on the border.
Police officers and a
prominent rancher have been murdered. There have been kidnappings believed to
be tied to the Mexican drug cartels. There are nightly high-speed chases
through the barrios where innocent people are constantly at risk.
If Arizona does not get
control of the border and stop the invasion, U.S. citizens will stop coming to
Arizona and will begin to depart, as they are already fleeing California.
A
country that cannot control its borders isn't really a country anymore, Ronald
Reagan reminded us.
What we are talking about
here is the Balkanization and breakup of a nation into ethnic enclaves. A country that cannot control its borders
isn't really a country anymore, Ronald Reagan reminded us.
The tasks that Arizonans are
themselves undertaking are ones that belong by right, the Constitution and
federal law to the Border Patrol, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and
Homeland Security.
Arizona has been compelled to
assume the feds' role because the feds won't do their job. And for that
dereliction of duty the buck stops on the desk of the president of the United
States.
Why is Obama paralyzed? Why
does he not enforce the law, even if he dislikes it, by punishing the
businessmen who hire illegals and by sending the 12 million to 20 million
illegals back home? President Eisenhower did it. Why won't he?
*
AMERICA – POSTED! NO LEGAL NEED
APPLY! BUT WE STILL GET THE BILLS FOR THE LA RAZA WELFARE AND CRIME STATE IN
OUR BORDERS!
JOE LEGAL
and JOSE ILLEGAL… who will vote for obama? JOSE ILLEGAL GETS AMERICAN JOBS WITH
A STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER. OBAMA HAS PROMISED ILLEGALS HE WOULD SABOTAGE
E-VERIFY, WHICH THE LA RAZA DEMS IN MEXIFORNIA HAVE OUTLAWED!
JOE LEGAL
STILL GETS THE TAX BILLS TO PAY FOR JOSE ILLEGAL’S “FREE” ANCHOR BABY BIRTHING
AND WELFARE, “FREE” EDUCATION, “FREE” DEM DREAM ACTS, “FREE” OBAMACARE and MEX
CRIME TIDAL WAVE.
CAN OBAMA
PUNK JOE LEGAL TO VOTE FOR HIS “CHANGE” AGAIN?
OBAMA HAS
PROMISED ILLEGALS GREATER LOOTING IS AROUND THE NEXT ELECTION. THEY JUST NEED
TO GET REGISTERED TO ILLEGALLY VOTE!
MOST OF THE FORTUNE 500 ARE GENEROUS DONORS TO LA
RAZA – THE MEXICAN FASCIST POLITICAL PARTY
(THESE FIGURES
ARE DATED. NOW CALCULATED TO BE $300 TO $400 BILLION PER YEAR!)
“The principal beneficiaries of our current
immigration policy are affluent Americans who hire immigrants at substandard
wages for low-end work. Harvard economist George Borjas estimates that American
workers lose $190 billion annually in depressed wages caused by the constant
flooding of the labor market at the low-wage end.”Christian Science Monitor
*
Much
more can be done on immigration before election
06/19/12 07:42 PM
ET
-
Congress
doesn’t have to wait until Election Day to respond to what the American people
care about. Poll after poll shows that the American people are overwhelmingly
concerned about jobs and the economy. They also consider national security an
important issue. By making some changes to our immigration system, Congress can
take action now to address the issues Americans care about the most.
We could open up millions of jobs for
unemployed American workers by requiring all U.S. employers to use E-Verify.
Last year, the House Judiciary Committee approved a bipartisan bill that does
just that, the Legal Workforce Act.
E-Verify is a Web-based program that quickly identifies
illegal immigrants in the workforce and protects jobs for legal workers by
checking the Social Security numbers of new hires. The program is free, quick
and easy to use. It only takes about a minute to run a newly hired employee
through E-Verify and persons eligible to work here are immediately confirmed
99.5 percent of the time. More than 375,000 employers already use E-Verify, and
2,200 new businesses sign up each week.
Considering
its track record, it’s no surprise that a recent poll found 82 percent of
Americans surveyed support the expansion of E-Verify. And with 13 million
Americans unemployed and 7 million illegal immigrants working here, now is the
time to expand this popular program.
We
could also boost job creation and improve our economy by allowing the United
States to retain some of the world’s best and brightest foreign graduates of
American universities. Foreign students receive nearly 4 out of every 10
master’s degrees awarded in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM)
fields and about the same percentage of all doctorates. These students have the
potential to come up with an invention that could save thousands of lives or
jump-start a whole new industry. They also have the ability to start a company
that could provide jobs to tens of thousands of American workers.
Unfortunately,
our immigration system does not always put American interests first — we select
only 5 percent of our immigrants based on the skills and education they bring
to the United States. Our immigration laws should not force the country to
forfeit retaining some of the most talented students from around the world. We
should make tweaks to our immigration system to allow more of the top foreign
graduates of American universities to stay and work here.
Our
immigration system should also better protect our country and citizens from
foreign nationals who wish to do us harm. Recent events underscore the need to
strengthen and improve visa security; we know terrorists use loopholes and
weaknesses in our immigration system to enter the United States. In fact, all
of the 9/11 terrorists entered the country legally on visas. And terrorists
will continue coming to the United States legally if we do not improve and
tighten our visa security process.
The
Secure Visas Act, approved by the House Judiciary Committee last year, helps
prevent terrorists from obtaining U.S. visas by expanding the number of visa
security units overseas to areas designated as “highest risk” for terror
threats. Visa security units ensure that thorough background checks are
conducted on all visa applicants, not just a select few. The bill also allows
U.S. officials to expedite the removal of terrorists who are in the United
States on a visa. Visa security is critical to America’s national security.
The
safety of all Americans could be further enhanced by enacting the Keep Our
Communities Safe Act that was approved by the House Judiciary Committee last
year. This bill is designed to prevent dangerous criminal immigrants from being
released into our communities.
Recent
Supreme Court decisions have ruled that under current law, illegal and criminal
immigrants cannot be detained for more than six months when they cannot be
removed to their home country in the near future. Because some countries refuse
to take back their criminal immigrants, federal authorities have had no choice
but to release thousands of dangerous criminal immigrants into our
neighborhoods.
Tragically,
there have been at least eight preventable deaths because of this loophole. We
cannot continue to let dangerous criminal immigrants slip through the cracks of
our legal justice system. We have a responsibility to make sure the laws of
this land protect Americans rather than endanger them. The Keep Our Communities
Safe Act provides a legislative remedy to this problem by allowing dangerous
criminal immigrants to be detained beyond six months if they cannot be
deported.
Election
Day might be just five months away, but that shouldn’t stop Congress from doing
its job now. Congress still has an opportunity to work across party lines and
take up immigration bills that will help put Americans back to work and make
our country safer.
Smith is chairman of the House Judiciary Committee.
Amnesty
for Immigrants?
To the Editor:
Jorge G.
CastaƱeda and Douglas S. Massey (“Do-It-Yourself Immigration Reform,” Op-Ed, June 2)
argue that we should grant amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants because
illegal immigration from Mexico is down. But this conclusion is flawed.
First, they claim
that Mexican illegal immigration is down because of decreased job
opportunities. But this doesn’t mean that illegal immigrants won’t try to enter
once the economy improves.
For this reason,
we need to turn off the jobs magnet that encourages illegal immigration. We
should expand E-Verify, a Web-based program that quickly identifies illegal
immigrants working here and protects jobs for legal workers.
And since the
Government Accountability Office has found that only 44 percent of the
Southwest border is under the “operational control” of the Border Patrol, the
border is still not secure and remains an open invitation to more illegal
immigration.
Second, while illegal immigration has slightly diminished, it’s
still a problem. Last year, more than 340,000 people were apprehended trying to
enter the country illegally. But it’s estimated that there are two to three
successful illegal crossings for every one thwarted. That means more than a
million illegal immigrants could have entered last year.
Third, not all
illegal immigrants are from Mexico. Each year, tens of thousands of illegal
immigrants enter the United States from countries other than Mexico, including
some countries with strong ties to terrorist organizations like Syria, Iran,
Somalia, Nigeria and Pakistan. This means that if we grant amnesty to all
illegal immigrants in the United States, it could also include those who wish
to do us harm.
Granting amnesty to illegal immigrants is a shortsighted fix that
will only encourage more illegal immigration.
LAMAR SMITH
Washington, June 6, 2012
Washington, June 6, 2012
WIKILEAKS EXPOSES OBAMA'S AGENDA OF LA
RAZA SUPREMACY AND AN ILLEGAL IN EVERY AMERICAN JOB TO KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED.
THE LEGALS GET THE TAX BILLS FOR THE MEX WELFARE AND CRIME TIDAL WAVE.
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2012/05/illegals-obama-promises-his-la-raza.html
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2012/05/illegals-obama-promises-his-la-raza.html
LA RAZA "THE RACE" lies - MEX FASCISM (VIVA LA
RAZA SUPREMACY? obama does!)
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2012/01/heather-mac-donald-la-raza-fascist.html
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2012/01/heather-mac-donald-la-raza-fascist.html
MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com
OBAMA HAS FILLED
HIS ADMINSTRATION WITH PRIMARILY LA RAZA PARTY MEMBERS.
Here’s his Sec.
Labor, HILDA SOLIS:
While in
Congress, she opposed strengthening the border fence, supported expansion of
illegal alien benefits (including driver's licenses and in-state tuition
discounts), embraced sanctuary cities that refused to cooperate with federal
homeland security officials to enforce immigration laws, and aggressively
championed a mass amnesty. Solis was steeped in the pro-illegal alien worker
organizing movement in Southern California and was buoyed by amnesty-supporting
Big Labor groups led by the Service Employees International Union. She has now
caused a Capitol Hill firestorm over her new taxpayer-funded advertising and
outreach campaign to illegal aliens regarding fair wages:
*
Michelle
Malkin
The
U.S. Department of Illegal Alien Labor
President
Obama's Labor Secretary Hilda Solis is supposed to represent American workers.
What you need to know is that this longtime open-borders sympathizer has always
had a rather radical definition of "American." At a Latino voter
registration project conference in Los Angeles many years ago, Solis asserted
to thunderous applause, "We are all Americans, whether you are legalized
or not."
That's
right. The woman in charge of enforcing our employment laws doesn't give a hoot
about our immigration laws -- or about the fundamental distinction between
those who followed the rules in pursuit of the American dream and those who
didn't.
While in
Congress, she opposed strengthening the border fence, supported expansion of
illegal alien benefits (including driver's licenses and in-state tuition
discounts), embraced sanctuary cities that refused to cooperate with federal
homeland security officials to enforce immigration laws, and aggressively
championed a mass amnesty. Solis was steeped in the pro-illegal alien worker
organizing movement in Southern California and was buoyed by amnesty-supporting
Big Labor groups led by the Service Employees International Union. She has now caused
a Capitol Hill firestorm over her new taxpayer-funded advertising and outreach
campaign to illegal aliens regarding fair wages:
"I'm
here to tell you that your president, your secretary of labor and this
department will not allow anyone to be denied his or her rightful pay --
especially when so many in our nation are working long, hard and often
dangerous hours," Solis says in the video pitch. "We can help, and we
will help. If you work in this country, you are protected by our laws. And you
can count on the U.S. Department of Labor to see to it that those protections
work for you."
To
be sure, no one should be scammed out of "fair wages." Employers that
hire and exploit illegal immigrant workers deserve full sanctions and
punishment. But it's the timing, tone-deafness and underlying blanket amnesty
agenda of Solis' illegal alien outreach that has so many American workers and
their representatives on Capitol Hill rightly upset.
With double-digit
unemployment and a growing nationwide revolt over Washington's border security
failures, why has Solis chosen now to hire 250 new government field
investigators to bolster her illegal alien workers' rights campaign? (Hint:
Leftists unhappy with Obama's lack of progress on "comprehensive
immigration reform" need appeasing. This is a quick bone to distract
them.)
Unfortunately,
the federal government is not alone in lavishing attention and resources on
workers who shouldn't be here in the first place. As of 2008, California,
Florida, Nevada, New York, Texas and Utah all expressly included illegal aliens
in their state workers' compensation plans -- and more than a dozen other
states implicitly cover them.
Solis'
public service announcement comes on the heels of little-noticed but far more
troubling comments encouraging illegal alien workers in the Gulf Coast. Earlier
this month, in the aftermath of the BP oil spill, according to Spanish language
publication El Diario La Prensa, Solis signaled that her department was going
out of its way to shield illegal immigrant laborers involved in cleanup
efforts. "My purpose is to assist the workers with respect to safety and
protection," she said. "We're protecting all workers regardless of
migration status because that's the federal law." She told reporters that
her department was in talks with local Immigration and Customs Enforcement
(ICE) officials who had visited coastal worksites to try to verify that workers
were legal.
No
word yet on whether she gave ICE her "we are all Americans, whether you
are legalized or not" lecture. But it's a safe bet.
*
HERE’S HOW NO E-VERIFY BREAKS
DOWN:
Joe Legal vs. Jose Illegal
CA MAKES E-VERIFY ILLEGAL! COURTESY THE
MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA!
Joe Legal vs. Jose Illegal
Here is an example of why hiring illegal aliens is not economically productive for the State of California...
Here is an example of why hiring illegal aliens is not economically productive for the State of California...
You have 2 families..."Joe Legal" and "Jose Illegal". Both families have 2 parents, 2 children and live in California.
"Joe Legal" works in construction, has a Social Security Number, and makes $25.00 per hour with payroll taxes deducted...."Jose Illegal" also works in construction, has "NO" Social Security Number, and gets paid $15.00 cash "under the table".
Joe Legal...$25.00 per hour x 40 hours $1000.00 per week, $52,000 per year
Now take 30% away for state and federal tax
Joe Legal now has $31,231.00
Jose Illegal...$15.00 per hour x 40 hours $600.00 per week, $31,200.00 per year
Jose Illegal pays no taxes...
Jose Illegal now has $31,200.00
Joe Legal pays Medical and Dental Insurance with limited coverage
$1000.00 per month
$12,000.00 per year
Joe Legal now has $19,231.00
Jose Illegal has full Medical and Dental coverage through the state and local clinics at a cost of $0.00 per year
Jose Illegal still has $31,200.00
Joe Legal makes too much money is not eligible for Food Stamps or welfare
Joe Legal pays for food
$1,000.00 per month
$12,000.00 per year
Joe Legal now has $ 7,231.00
Jose Illegal has no documented income and is eligible for Food Stamps and Welfare
Jose Illegal still has $31,200.00
Joe Legal pays rent of
$1,000.00 per month
$12,000.00 per year
Joe Legal is now in the hole... minus (-) $4,769.00
Jose Illegal receives a $500 per month Federal rent subsidy
Jose Illegal pays rent
$500.00 per month
$6,000.00 per year
Jose Illegal still has $25,200.00
Joe Legal now works overtime on Saturdays or gets a part time job after work.
Jose Illegal has nights and weekends off to enjoy with his family.
Joe Legal's and Jose Illegal's children both attend the same school. Joe Legal pays for his children's lunches while Jose Illegal's children get a government sponsored lunch.
Jose Illegal's children have an after school ESL program. Joe Legal's children go home.
Joe Legal and Jose Illegal both enjoy the same Police and Fire Services, but Joe paid for them and Jose did not pay.
Don't vote/support any politician that supports illegal aliens...
Its WAY PAST time to take a stand for America and Americans!
No comments:
Post a Comment