"The truth is that the
majority receiving SNAP benefits have a worker in the home. The largest single
group receiving it is white."
The
Feinstein-Boxer LA RAZA Welfare State: 1.5 MILLION MORE “CHEAP” LABOR MEXICAN
FARM WORKERS TO EXPLOIT.
A CASE STUDY IN HOW THE LA RAZA DEMS BUILD THE MEXICAN WELFARE STATE OFF THE BACKS OF AMERICANS (LEGALS). THIS IS SOMETHING FEINSTEIN, BOXER, PELOSI AND OBAMA HAVE DONE TO THE TUNE OF $22 BILLION IN CA, A MEX-OCCUPIED WELFARE AND GANG INFESTED STATE.
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2012/06/sen-dianne-feinstein-barbara-boxer-and.html
Jose Herria emigrated illegally from Mexico to Stockton, Calif., in 1997 to work as a fruit picker. He brought with him his wife, Felipa, and three children, 19, 12 and 8 -- all illegals. When Felipa gave birth to her fourth child, daughter Flor, the family had what is referred to as an "anchor baby" -- an American citizen by birth who provided the entire Silverio clan a ticket to remain in the U.S. permanently.
THE AMERICAN
GOVERNMENT’S WAR ON THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ON BEHALF OF THEIR SPECIAL INTERESTS
PAYMASTERS
IT IS NOT BY
ACCIDENT THAT AMERICAN BORDERS WITH NARCOMEX ARE LEFT WIDE OPEN, UNDEFENDED AND
SABOTAGED BY THE HISPANDERING OBAMA REGIME AS IT WAS PRIOR ADMINISTRATIONS. IT’S
ALL ABOUT KEEPING WAGES DEPRESSED WITH HORDES OF ILLEGALS. THE REAL COST FOR
ALL THAT STAGGERINGLY EXPENSIVE “CHEAP” MEXICAN LABOR IS PASSED ALONG TO THE
AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS WITHOUT VOTE. IT’S THE WAY THE DEMS OPERATE: BY HOOK,
CROOK, STEALTH AND BRIBES FROM SPECIAL INTERESTS.
THE LA RAZA
SUPREMACY PARTY IN CA (DEMS ELECTED BY ILLEGALS) IN CA, MEX-OCCUPIED MEXIFORNIA,
A LA RAZA WELFARE STATE, HAS ENACTED LAW AFTER LAW THAT BENEFITED ONLY
ILLEGALS. ONE OF THEIR LAST WAS TO MAKE IT ILLEGAL FOR EMPLOYERS TO USE
E-VERIFY. VIRTUALLY ALL SERVICE SECTOR/HOSPITALITY AND CONSTRUCTION, AND FARM
LABOR JOBS GO TO MEXICANS, MANY USING STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS.
WHILE THESE
EXPLOITED MEXICANS EARN MISERABLE WAGES,
THESE WAGES ARE STILL ABOUT 8XS MORE PER HOUR THAN THEY WOULD BE PAID IN MEXICO
FOR THE SAME LABOR. IN THE UNITED STATES LA RAZA GETS “FREE” GRINGO PAID
HEALTHCARE, ANCHOR BABY BIRTHING = 18 YEARS OF WELFARE, EDUCATION, FOODS
STAMPS, AND EDUCATION.
PART OF THE
AMNESTY HOAX IS TO KEEP THE FLOOD OF FARM WORKERS JUMPING OUR BORDERS SO HIGHLY
PROFITABLE BIG AG BIZ DOES NOT HAVE TO PAY LIVING WAGES. WE’VE ALL HEARD THE CRAP
ABOUT THE $5 HEAD OF LETTUCE. IT’S REALLY JUST ABOUT KEEPING WAGES AT SLAVE
LABOR LEVEL AND THEN PASSING ON THE REAL COST OF THIS LABOR TO THE AMERICAN
MIDDLE CLASS IN CA. SENS. FEINSTEIN AND BOXER, TWO OF THE MOST CORRUPT AND
SELF-SERVING POLITICIANS IN AMERICAN HISTORY, BOTH HAVING AMASSED MILLIONS OF
DOLLARS OF WEALTH OFF ELECTED OFFICE, HAVE THREE TIMES PUSHED FOR A “SPECIAL
AMNESTY” FOR 1.5 MILLION NEW MEXICAN FARM WORKERS TO EXPLOIT DESPITE THAT FACT
THAT ONE-THIRD OF ALL FARM WORKERS END UP ON WELFARE. UNFORTUNATELY MANY
AMERICANS (LEGALS) STILL SEEM TO THINK THAT ILLEGALS DON’T COLLECT WELFARE.
THEY DO AND IN THE BILLIONS OF DOLLARS WORTH.
REP. NANCY
PELOSI HAS LONG HIRED ILLEGALS AT HER ST. HELENA, NAPA CA WINERY. FEINSTEIN HAS
LONG HIRED ILLEGALS AT HER S.F. HOTEL, ONLY MILES FROM HER $16 MILLION DOLLAR
WAR PROFITEER’S MANSION.
BELOW IS A
CASE STUDY OF THE STAGGERING REAL COST OF JUST ONE MEXICAN FARM WORKER AND HIS
ANCHOR BABIES WHO WILL COLLECT WELFARE FOR AT LEAST 18 YEARS AND BY THAT TIME
WILL HAVE GIVEN BIRTH TO NUMEROUS ILLEGITIMATE CHILDREN WHO COLLECT WELFARE.
EVEN AT THE END OF THAT 18 YEARS, NONE OF THESE PEOPLE WILL BE ABLE TO SPEAK
ENGLISH, AND NONE WILL HAVE ANY DESIRE TO BECOME AMERICAN CITIZENS, EVEN AS
THEY ENDLESSLY RANT FOR MORE LA RAZA WELFARE AND VOTE DEM.
BARACK OBAMA
HAS SABOTAGED AMERICAN BORDERS USING ANY DEVICE AT HAND. ONE OF THE LAST WAS TO
FURLOUGH 6,000 BORDER GUARDS AND LET LOSE ON US 2,000 MEXICAN CRIMINALS UNDER
THE GUISE OF SEQUESTER.
DURING OBAMA’S
FIRST TERM, A PERIOD OF NATIONAL UNEMPLOYMENT CRISIS FOR AMERICANS (LEGALS),
2/3s OF ALL JOBS WENT TO IMMIGRANTS, BOTH LEGAL AND ILLEGAL. FEDERAL WORKPLACE
ENFORCEMENT OF LAWS PROHIBITING THE EMPLOYMENT OF ILLEGALS PLUMMETED 70%, AND
IS EXPECTED TO BE NON-EXISTENT DURING OBAMA’S SECOND TERM AFTER ILLEGALS
REELECTED HIM. OBAMA’S SEC. of (illegal) LABOR WAS LA RAZA SUPREMACIST HILDA
SOLIS AND HIS NOMINEE FOR THE SECOND TERM IS THOMAS PEREZ. OBAMA’S ONLY
NOMINEED TO THE SUPREME COURT WAS LA RAZA PARTY MEMBER SONIA SOTOMAYOR, WHO
VOTED AGAINST E-VERIFY AND REFERS TO ILLEGALS AS “UNDOCUMENTED ALIANS”. HOW
SWEET. MEANWHILE ERIC HOLDER ENDLESSLY HARASSES AMERICAN STATES ON BEHALF OF
OBAMA’S LA RAZA SUPREMACY AGENDA. HE HAS SUED ARIZONA TO BLOCK E-VERIFY, AND
THREE OTHER STATES. HOLDER HAS NATIONWIDE ATTEMPTED TO BLOCK STATES FROM
CURBING MEXICANS FROM VOTING BY DEMANDING IDs. ONE NEWSPAPER IN SANTA ROSA, CA, QUOTED ON THE
FRONT PAGE AN ILLEGAL WOMAN THAT DECLARED SHE WOULD NOT VOTE FOR OBAMA AGAIN
UNLESS HE HANDED THEM AMNESTY! SOME AMERICANS THINK THAT ILLEGALS RESPECT
AMERICAN LAWS EVEN AS THEY DRIVE ILLEGALLY, CONTRACT ILLEGALLY, USE STOLEN
SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS AND FRAUDULENT IDs TO
LOOT US FOR MORE… NOPE, THESE PEOPLE HAVE NO RESPECT FOR THE STUPID
GRINGO, OUR BORDERS, WHICH THEY ARE INDOCTRINATED INTO THINKING DO NOT EXIST,
OUR FLAG, OUR CULTURE AND LANGUAGE OR LAWS!
THE OBAMA – McCain
AMNESTY HOAX IS FILLED WITH MULTIPLE DEVICES TO CONTINUE OBAMA’S SABOTAGE OF
HOMELAND SECURITY AND E-VERIFY. THE GANG OF 8 SCHUMER HAS DECLARED THAT
HOMELAND SECURITY IT NOT IMPORTANT. RUBIO DECLARED THAT HOMELAND SECURITY WOULD
NOT IMPACT THE AMNESTY HOAX FOR THE FIRST FIVE YEARS, DURING WHICH TIME THE
REST OF MEXICO WILL HAVE INVADED, OCCUPIED AND PURSUED VOTING FOR HISPANIC LA
RAZA SUPREMACIST.
THE FASTEST
GROWING POLITICAL PART IN AMERICA IS NOT THE TEA BAGGERS, IT IS THE MEXICAN
FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA “THE RACE”. IN THE OBAMA – McCAIN AMNESTY HOAX THERE
IS $150 MILLION AMERICAN TAX DOLLARS TO BE HANDED OVER TO HIS MEXICAN FASCIST
ORGANIZATION.
NOW WHILE
CONGRESS IS CUTTING FOOD STAMPS FOR AMERICANS, OBAMA IS HANDING !!!!! ILLEGALS
!!!!! FOOD STAMPS BY THE TRUCK LOADS OUT THE BACK DOOR.
WSWS.org
US farm bill proposals include huge cuts to food assistance
By Ruby Rankin
27 May 2013
27 May 2013
On May
15, the House Agricultural Committee passed its 2013 farm bill called the
Federal Agriculture Reform and Risk Management Act of 2013. The bill includes
almost $21 billion in cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program
(SNAP) program over the next ten years. Close to two million low-income people
will be cut off altogether the food assistance program formerly known as food
stamps. An estimated $39.7 billion would be cut from the entire farm bill. Over
half of those cuts come from SNAP. This will mean a loss of an average of $25
of monthly SNAP benefits for a family of four.
The SNAP program, upon
which 48 million people depended last year for their survival, half of them
children, is the principal remaining assistance offered to the poorest in
America.
The farm
bill is the generic name for the large bundle of legislation that governs the
USDA (United States Department of Agriculture) and food and fiber
production and distribution in the US. Because the scope of the USDA is
wide-ranging, covering farming, agriculture, forestry and food, it is hotly
debated with big business, and many powerful interests invest millions to lobby
for favorable provisions for their special interest.
Over the
past 50 years farm bills have been re-argued, reconfigured and renamed
approximately every five years. The last farm bill, called the Food,
Conservation and Energy Act of 2008, expired September 30, 2012 without a new
farm bill being negotiated through Congress. A nine-month extension was cobbled
together in January 2013, leaving mostly intact the
farm subsidies, while cutting $110 million from Supplemental Nutrition
Assistance Program (SNAP) Education programs and funding to programs promoting
local food production and organic farm practices.
The farm
bill covers a vast array of programs: farm subsidies, income protection
insurance for farm owners, research and development in agriculture,
rejuvenation and conservation of fragile and significant country and wetlands,
support for local and regional food production and distribution, research into
organic food production, and trials of healthy school lunch and snack programs.
Both houses of the US
Congress are working on farm bills in an effort to pass legislation in the next
few months that will make the biggest cuts to welfare since Bill Clinton’s
1996, “end of welfare as we know it” legislation that dismantled Aid to
Families with Dependant Children.
With record numbers of
people on food stamps due to the economic crisis, the discussion between the
Republicans and Democrats is purely on the level of how much will be cut. The
fact that tens of millions of Americans routinely go hungry is simply not an
issue. The
Senate Agriculture Committee chair Debbie Stabenow (D-Michigan) offers the
“kinder-gentler” position of a $400 million annual cut from food stamps, but
the final vote will not take place until next week. Welfare recipients are
vilified in the media and by politicians as dependent, fraudsters, lazy and
from minority backgrounds, spending taxpayers’ money on sugary carbonated
beverages and other junk on the one hand or exotic gourmet food on the other.
By some bizarre reasoning, food stamps become the cause of obesity. These
accusations are then used to demand cuts that will deprive people of their only
source of sustenance; rather than address the underlying causes of
unemployment, under-employment and low wages as well as the growing incidence
of food deserts—neighborhoods that only have markets selling junk food and fast
food outlets.
The truth is that the
majority receiving SNAP benefits have a worker in the home. The largest single
group receiving it is white. African Americans and Hispanics are the second
and third largest groups. “Households typically include a child, an elderly
person or a disabled person, and a gross income of $744 a month,” according to
thefoodjournal.com.
The use
of food stamps occurs all across the US, but there are areas of higher
concentration. Washington DC is one of the highest with 23 percent of the
population on food stamps last year. About
1,000 active members of the US military also rely on food stamps.
Since 2008 there has been
exponential growth in the need for SNAP—over 15 million people were added in
one year. Even so,
the social safety net in the US is meager, to say the least. A family of 3 must
have less than $23,800 per year to qualify for a $4.50 per day benefit or $300
per month.
Either
version of the farm bill cuts will be achieved by many more hundreds of
thousands going hungry—half of them children. And it is not only the Republican
right that claim food stamps are too expensive and the US must take food from
its poorest citizens. In financial year 2012, the US allocated $74.6 billion to
SNAP to reduce the suffering of the most oppressed Americans. The US military spent that amount every 9 days or so through 2012.
Along
with the cuts, provisions are proposed that will monitor what people are buying
with food stamps and where—in the name of fighting obesity and fraud. These
proposals have proponents from diverse groups from the far right to anti-hunger
campaigners. The issues are complex. SNAP is distributed by plastic card
similar to a credit card. It can only be used in stores which can process this
card. This means that the big retailers like Walmart get a huge benefit from
food stamps while farmers markets get none.
Information
on where food stamps are spent and what is purchased with them will only be
used to make further spending cuts or other attacks on the working class. US
farm subsidy programs originated from the Great Depression and FDR’s New Deal
to aid struggling farmers through tough times, whether made tough by
over-production and low prices or by dust bowl weather conditions. In 1933 the
federal government bought excess grain from struggling farmers and distributed
it to charities to feed the hungry—a pragmatic solution to a crisis of
over-production of agricultural commodities. This is why welfare and farm
subsidies are historically linked in legislation. Because they are in the same
bill and SNAP is by far the largest component, some sense of proportionality is
claimed in the present debate to make it necessary to cut food stamps, pitting
nutrition against production. In the House bill nearly half the proposed cuts
come from nutrition.
Over the
course of the 2008 farm bill, $314 billion went to SNAP, that is over 70
percent of the whole $412 billion, five-year expenditure. $60 billion went to
farm subsidies and insurance schemes. $22 billion on conservation programs and
the rest, $15 billion, was divided among many other programs, agricultural
research, rural infrastructure and economic development, specialty crop
development (i.e., vegetables, fruits, nuts—whatever is not one of the
commodity grains covered by farm subsidies), overseas food aid, WTO
obligations, forestry, livestock, dairy, organic food production, the school
lunch and snack programs, to name a few.
The
second largest component, the farm subsidy and income protection insurance
schemes are also the target of cuts in this farm bill. Many struggling farmers
survive because of the farm subsidy and insurance programs; however, not
surprisingly, the vast majority of farm support goes to the big end of
town—literally.
The urban areas of
Manhattan, Los Angeles, Chicago, Dallas, Washington DC and San Francisco is
where the USDA pays the majority of the farm subsidy and insurance schemes,
i.e., not to farmers but to the owners of large agricultural operations. SEN.
FEINSTEIN and BOXER’S BIG AG BIZ DONORS!
Five
commodity crops: corn, wheat, soybean, rice and cotton receive about 75 percent
of the benefits of farm subsidies. (Tobacco got almost $200 million in 2011.)
Vegetables, fruit and nuts are called “specialty” crops and do not get
subsidized. This is the principle mechanism by which 62 percent of US farmers
get no USDA support (they may get insurance and apply for disaster relief) and
the richest 10 percent of farm owners get 74 percent of the subsidies.
According
to The Environmental Working Group, “The top 20 percent of subsidy
recipients collected almost 80 percent of all insurance funding. By contrast,
the bottom 80 percent of premium subsidy recipients [389,494 operations],
collected, on average, about $5,000.”
Direct
payment subsidy to farmers, about $5 billion a year, is cut out of both House
and Senate farm bills, although the House version phases it out over some years
for the cotton growers. New insurance schemes are being proposed in both bills
that will claw back much of what is lost in direct payments, especially for
corn, soybean, rice and peanut farmers.
$600
million a year is the proposed cut to vital conservation programs that moderate
the effects of agricultural sources of water pollution, protect top soil from
erosion (avoiding another dust bowl) and preserving endangered flora and fauna
by protecting habitat.
Whatever
the eventual outcome of the farm bill in 2013, one can have every confidence
that the interests of big business will be well taken care of, while the most
vulnerable in society will be made to suffer even more loss. There has been
some fanfare around adding a food for needy kids program, but shamefully,
funding for the new program comes by reducing by 10 percent per person other
SNAP benefits.
WSWS.org
Poverty skyrockets in US suburbs AS
WELFARE FOR ILLEGALS SOARS
WELFARE FOR ILLEGALS SOARS
By Marcus Day
23 May 2013
23 May 2013
According to a new book published by the Brookings
Institution, poverty in American suburbs soared more than 64 percent from 2000
to 2011. The report, titled Confronting Suburban Poverty in America,
revealed that nearly 16.4 million suburban residents are now living below the
federal poverty line, up from roughly 10 million in 2000.
The study reveals that the biggest surge
in suburban poverty occurred in the centers of the housing collapse throughout
the South and Southwest. Poverty in the suburbs of Phoenix, Arizona rose by
134.2 percent; Las Vegas, Nevada by 139.3 percent; Austin, Texas by 142.5
percent; and Atlanta, Georgia by 158.9 percent. However, there were a number of
other cities spread throughout the country, many in former industrial areas,
which also saw increases in poverty of 100 percent or more, including Detroit,
Michigan (114.7 percent), Minneapolis, Minnesota (127.9 percent), Boise, Idaho
(129.7 percent), Denver, Colorado (138.2 percent), and Salt Lake City, Utah
(141.7 percent).
Although inner cities still have a greater proportion of
their population living in poverty—22 percent, versus 12 percent in the suburbs—the
latter’s increase in poverty over the last 10 years was more than twice that of
US cities—64 percent, versus 29 percent in the cities. The suburbs now hold the
largest overall number of people living below the poverty limit, with 3 million
more poor people than in the big cities and 9 million more than in rural areas.
As bleak as this portrait is, it nevertheless falls short of
a truly accurate picture of the desperate situation facing millions more
families. The federal poverty limit—defined as a yearly income at or below
$22,314 for a family of four—is a grossly inadequate measure of real social
misery. Indeed, shortly after last year’s presidential elections a change in
the poverty measure worked out by the Census Bureau produced an upward revision
of the overall US poverty rate from 15 percent to 16.1 percent—the highest rate
since 1965 and comprising nearly 50 million people. Forty-eight percent of the
population is now categorized as at or “near poor,” meaning they make less than
twice the federal poverty limit (see: “The social crisis
in America”).
The authors of the study pointed out that the suburbs are in
many ways even less capable of providing an adequate safety net for the poor
than urban areas. Much of what little social assistance the federal government
provides is directed towards larger cities, and high fuel costs and the
almost-total lack of public transportation in many suburbs pose significant
obstacles to commuting to a job or traveling to social service agencies.
The study partly ascribes the explosive growth of suburban
poverty to changing demographic trends. Many impoverished workers and youth
from the inner cities have been chased out by gentrification and the
destruction of public housing over the preceding decades and were able to find
relatively more affordable housing in the suburbs—for a time. In addition, the
destruction of manufacturing jobs around Midwestern cities has driven many to
seek unskilled, low-wage work in the service industry.
Although suburban poverty has been growing steadily over the
last decade, it was given a sharp impetus by the housing market plunge and
subsequent economic crisis. According to the authors of the study, nearly 75 percent
of home foreclosures have occurred in the suburbs. The steep fall in property
values has had devastating effects for working and even middle class families:
last year, a Federal Reserve report revealed that the median net worth of US
families had plunged nearly 40 percent between 2007 and 2010 (see: “Crisis has thrown
US families back 20 years”). By the Brookings Institution’s own
estimates, the number of those living in poverty in the suburbs increased by 1
million between 2010 and 2011 alone, from 15.4 million to 16.4 million.
As Jennifer Clary, research associate for the Chicago-based
non-profit Heartland Alliance, told the Chicago Tribune, “It’s really
clear that lower incomes combined with the rising cost of pretty much
everything in life are really crushing people in the suburbs.” Along with
skyrocketing costs for education and health care, workers’ wages, which
stagnated throughout 1980s and 1990s, have been under concerted attack since
the onset of the financial crisis, even as the stock market has recovered and
reached new heights.
Despite the alarming character of the study’s revelations,
its authors reach more or less conservative conclusions, stating that their
findings “underscore the need to think differently”—as if the financial elite
and their political representatives were merely unaware of the devastating
impact of their anti-social policies. Reflecting the lie of the political
establishment that there is simply not enough money to meet the needs of the
population, Elizabeth Kneebone, one of the study’s authors, stated, “There are
promising models emerging on how to use limited resources.” Among the book’s
proposals is a “competitive” federal grant, in which states or municipalities
would apparently be compelled to fight over funds for anti-poverty programs.
Regardless of the ineffectual proposals, the growth of
social misery revealed in the report explodes the myth, widely peddled over
previous decades that the population living in US suburbs is uniformly
complacent and economically secure. As Kneebone admitted, “When people think of
poverty in America, they tend to think of inner city neighborhoods or isolated
rural communities. But today, suburbs are home to the largest and fastest
growing poor population in the country.”
Whether it is in the suburbs or cities, in the US or
throughout the world, the impact of the capitalist crisis and the growth of
staggering inequality is creating enormous social tensions which will inevitably
erupt into open class conflict.
*
POST-ELECTION GIFT TO ILLEGALS: food stamps
OBMAMA’S
LA RAZA WELFARE STATE… plus illegals get all the jobs!
“Since
President Obama came into office, SNAP participation has increased at 10 times
the rate of job creation, the annual spending on SNAP has doubled, and one in
seven Americans now participates in SNAP,”
Obama's 'Hispanicazation' of
America
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/08/obamas-hispanicazation-of-america-most.html
JUDICIAL WATCH
OBAMA’S SECRET AMNESTY! WHAT WILL IT
COST US?
The LA RAZA GANG of 8 Promise Obama, illegals, Mexico
and Employers of Illegals NO E-VERIFY…. in a time of national unemployment
crisis for Americans, the entire amnesty sham is really all about keeping wages
depressed with endless hordes of Mexicans!
CHRISTIAN SCIENCE
MONITOR
May 28, 2009
The US should
think long and hard about the high number of Latino immigrants.
The principal beneficiaries of our current immigration policy are
affluent Americans who hire immigrants at substandard wages for low-end work.
Harvard economist George Borjas estimates that American workers lose $190
billion annually in depressed wages caused by the constant flooding of the
labor market at the low-wage end.
AMNESTY = Depressed Wages for Americans,
Poverty for Americas and Jobs and Massive Welfare for Illegals… it’s all about
keeping wages depressed!
THE TRAGEDY of LONG-TERM UNEMPLOYMENT
In America, all jobs go to foreign born
that are either imported or permitted to jump our borders!
*
CONGRESS
DECLARES THAT ILLEGALS SAP TAX DOLLARS… SO THEN WHAT WOULD 40 MILLION LEGALIZED MEXICAN LOOTERS DO???
GO OUT AND VOTE GOP?
*
UNDER OBAMA 2/3S JOBS GO TO ILLEGALS –
HIS SOLUTION? OPEN THE BORDERS WIDER and SABOTAGE E-VERIFY!
SOCIOPATH OBAMA – ALL
HIS WARS ARE TO PROTECT THE BORDERS OF THE MUSLIM DICTATORS HE PROPS UP ON OUR
TAX DOLLARS, EVEN WHILE HE SABOTAGES OUR BORDERS WITH NARCOMEX TO BUILD THE
DEMS’ PARTY BASE OF ILLEGALS…. AND THEY GET ALL THE JOBS, WELFARE AND
OBAMACARE!
HOW OBAMA’S AMNESTY HOAX DESTROYED the GOP and BUILT
the LA RAZA MEXICAN FASCIST WELFARE STATE IN AMERICA.
WHAT WOULD AMERICANS THINK IF THEY KNEW ABOUT OBAMA’S
TIES TO LA RAZA SUPREMACIST PARTY, WHICH HE FUNDS WITH AMERICAN TAX DOLLARS AND
OPERERATES OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE UNDER CECILIA MUNOZ?
JUDICIAL WATCH:
It proves the Obama administration is willing to go to any extent - including gaming the courts - to continue stonewalling the full story of its lawless release of illegal aliens. Now, with the prison floodgates being thrown open to illegal aliens under the phony pretense of abiding by sequester cuts, it is more important that details of this threat to the public safety be revealed.
THE OBAMA – McCAIN
AMNESTY… EXPECTING 100 MILLION MORE LA RAZA LOOTERS… it’s how we will keep
wages depressed!
“But in the last year or so, there have
been signs of an increase, and now a new poll suggests many Mexicans would come
to the U.S. if they had the chance. And many of them would come illegally if
necessary.”
*
The OBAMA – McCAIN Amnesty Promises NO E-VERIFY enforcement
to Employers and NO BORDER enforcement to LA RAZA invaders.
…isn’t
that what we already have going ????
Dream Act proposals are also a magnet for fraud. Many illegal
immigrants will fraudulently claim they came here as children or that they are
under 30. And the federal government has no way to check whether their claims
are true or not. REP. LAMAR SMITH
"It lets businesses that knowingly
violated the law off the hook," Mr. Krikorian said. "If they were not
withholding payroll taxes, they’re held harmless. If they were violating labor
laws, they’re held harmless. So this is a boon for crooked business."…
MARK KRIKORIAN
“Another force for amnesty is corporate America. Thousands of
businesses have hired illegals in violation of U.S. law. Amnesty for their
illegal workers means, de facto, amnesty for them”… PAT BUCHANAN
high cost of
illegals in Arizona
Arizona’s illegal immigrant population is costing the
state’s taxpayers even more than once thought -- a whopping $2.7 billion in
2009, according to researchers at the public interest group that helped write
the state's new immigration law.
KRUGMAN
CALIFORNIA – MEXICO’S $22 BILLION DOLLAR WELFARE STATE
CALIFORNIA IS A LOOTED COLONY OF
MEXICO. THE LA RAZA-CONTROLLED STATE LEGISALTURE PASSES LAW AFTER LAW THAT
BENEFITS ILLEGALS AND ENCOURAGES MORE OF THEM TO HOP OUR BORDERS.
*
Most Illegal
Immigrant Families Collect Welfare… ALL GET AMERICAN JOBS???
April
05, 2011
Surprise, surprise; Census Bureau data reveals that most U.S.
families headed by illegal immigrants use taxpayer-funded welfare programs on
behalf of their American-born anchor babies.
SENS.
FEINSTEIN and BOXER and NANCY PELOSI VOW TO BUILD AMERICAN’S BIGGEST
GRINGO-PAID “FREE” LA RAZA ANCHOR BABY FACTORY.
JUDICIAL WATCH:
While
the Obama Administration halts deportations to work on its secret
amnesty
plan, hospitals across the U.S. are getting stuck with the exorbitant tab of
medically treating illegal immigrants and some are finally demanding
compensation from the federal government.
BREEDING MEXICANS
ANCHOR
BABY FACTORIES…who pays?
AMNESTY IT IS! OBAMA
AND MEXICO ANNOUNCE EXPANDED ANCHOR BABY FACTORIES!
“Through love of having
children, we are going to take over.” AUGUSTIN CEBADA, BROWN BERETS, THE LA RAZA
FASCIST PARTY – OBAMA FUNDS LA RAZA WITH OUR TAX DOLLARS AND IT OPERATES OUT OF
THE WHITE HOUSE UNDER LA RAZA SUPREMACIST CECLIA MUNOZ – GOOGLE IT!
BLANKET
AMNESTY and CONTINUE NON-ENFORCEMENT ANNOUNCED. OBAMA and MEXICO ANNOUNCE TOTAL
AMNESTY and LA RAZA SUPREMACY ESTABLISHED IN ALL 50 AMERICAN STATES!
VIVA LA RAZA
FASCISM and SUPREMACY over AMERICANS (Legals)?
“What
we're seeing is our Congress and national leadership dismantling our laws by
not enforcing them. Lawlessness becomes the norm, just like Third World
corruption. Illegal aliens now have more rights and privileges than Americans.
If you are an illegal alien, you can drive a car without a driver's license or
insurance. You may obtain medical care without paying. You may work without
paying taxes. Your children enjoy free education at the expense of taxpaying
Americans.”
FOR LA RAZA, MEXICO and
the U.S. CHAMBER of COMMERCE, OBAMA VOWS TO SABOTAGE E-VERIFY AND BORDER
SECURITY TO KEEP WAGES FOR AMERICANS (Legals) DEPRESSED.
*
According to the Centers for Immigration Studies, April
'11, at least 70% of Mexican illegal alien families receive some type of
welfare in the US!!! cis.org
OBAMA’S SECOND TERM: MASS UNEMPLOYMET and ILLEGALS
GET ALL THE JOBS
*
RUBIO and OBAMA VOW TO ILLEGALS NO REAL BORDER
SECURITY AS THE MEXICAN HORDES JUMP OUR BORDERS FOR OUR JOBS AND WELFARE
*
OBAMA’S AMNESTY =
JOBS, OBAMACARE and LA RAZA DREAM ACTS of WELFARE PAID OFF OUR BACKS!
JUDICIAL WATCH
OBAMA’S SECRET AMNESTY! WHAT WILL IT
COST US?
OBAMA
TO CUT MEDICARE and SOCIAL SECURITY TO PAY FOR THE BILLIONS ILLEGALS COST US…
AND THEY STILL GET OUR JOBS!
OBAMA AND
OBAMA DONOR SEN. DIANNE FEINSTEIN LOOT MEDICARE
GOP: OBAMA’S AMNESTY HANDOUT WILL COST THE
AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS BILLIONS!
MY LORD, WHAT THE HELL ARE THE TALKING ABOUT? CA
ALONE PUTS OUT $22 BILLION PER YEAR IN SOCIAL SERVICES TO ILLEGALS, AND
COUNTIES PAY OUT EVEN MORE ON TOP OF THAT! LOS ANGELES COUNTY’S WELFARE TO
ILLEGALS COST $600 MILLION PER YEAR, PRIMARLY TO ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS…. AND
STILL THE JOBS IN L.A. ONLY GO TO HISPANICS!
Budget
cuts, DC debate have illegals surging across Mexican border, experts say
*
THE SABOTAGE of the
AMERICAN BORDERS by PRESIDENT OBAMA to BUILD THE LA RAZA DEM PARTY BASE of
ILLEGALS and DESTROY the GOP WITH AMNESTY for 40 MILLION NEW UNREGISTERED DEMS
Byron York: What is the real
number of illegal border crossings?
WELFARE or JOBS?... in obama’s America,
illegals get both, and americans none!
OBAMA’S LA RAZA
LOOTED AMERICA – ONLY JOBS FOR BANKSTER DONORS PROTECTED… ALL OTHERS GO TO
ILLEGALS.
THE FOOD STAMP
PRESIDENT
SOARING POVERTY IN AMERICA – SENIORS SUFFER AS
OBAMA and the LA RAZA DEMS BUILD THE LA RAZA MEXICAN WELFARE STATE and HAND THE
TAX BILLS FOR ALL OBAMA’S BANKSTERS’ LOOTING to the AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS!
Non-deportation rate drops — to 99.2 percent
The Washington Times
Saturday, May 18, 2013
The
Homeland Security Department has granted legal status to 99.2 percent of all
illegal immigrants who have applied under President Obama's new non-deportation
policy for young adults, according to the latest numbers released Friday.
*
The amnesty that
never ends
HISPANDERING BARACK OBAMA HAS PROMISED ILLEGALS,
MEXICO and LA RAZA THAT SHOULD AMNESTY FAIL, HE WILL CONTINUE HIS POLICIES OF
NON-ENFORCEMENT, SABOTAGE OF E-VERIFY AND OUR BORDERS TO EASE MILLIONS MORE
ILLEGALS INTO OUR VOTING BOOTHS AND JOBS!
By Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas) - 05/06/13 08:18 PM ET
Advocates for amnesty argue that the 11 million
immigrants in the country illegally should be legalized (but what if there are
40 million? What’s the math then?).
They claim we need to
bring illegal immigrants “out of the shadows.” But illegal immigrants are very
visible — they attend public schools, obtain health services at hospital
emergency rooms at taxpayer expense and even testify before Congress.
No comments:
Post a Comment