America Faces No Greater Threat Than Joe Biden and the Democrat Party. Their Assault to Our Borders Is As Great As Their Assault to Free Speech and Free Elections
Friday, April 12, 2019
RICK MORAN - WHITE HOUSE WANTED TO RELEASE ASYLUM SEEKERS INTO SANCTUARY CITIES
Exclusive–Steve Camarota: Every Illegal Alien Costs Americans $70K Over Their Lifetime
Every illegal alien, over the course of their lifetime, costs American taxpayers about $70,000, Center for Immigration Studies Director of Research Steve Camarota says.
During an interview with SiriusXM Patriot’s Breitbart News Daily, Camarota said his research has revealed the enormous financial burden that illegal immigration has on America’s working and middle class taxpayers in terms of public services, depressed wages, and welfare.
“In a person’s lifetime, I’ve estimated that an illegal border crosser might cost taxpayers … maybe over $70,000 a year as a net cost,” Camarota said. “And that excludes the cost of their U.S.-born children, which gets pretty big when you add that in.”
LISTEN:
“Once [an illegal alien] has a child, they can receive cash welfare on behalf of their U.S.-born children,” Camarota explained. “Once they have a child, they can live in public housing. Once they have a child, they can receive food stamps on behalf of that child. That’s how that works.”
Camarota said the education levels of illegal aliens, border crossers, and legal immigrants are largely to blame for the high level of welfare usage by the f0reign-born population in the U.S., noting that new arrivals tend to compete for jobs against America’s poor and working class communities.
In past waves of mass immigration, Camarota said, the U.S. did not have an expansive welfare system. Today’s ever-growing welfare system, coupled with mass illegal and legal immigration levels, is “extremely problematic,” according to Camarota, for American taxpayers.
The RAISE Act — reintroduced in the Senate by Senators Tom Cotton (R-AR), David Perdue (R-GA), and Josh Hawley (R-MO) — would cut legal immigration levels in half and convert the immigration system to favor well-educated foreign nationals, thus relieving American workers and taxpayers of the nearly five-decade-long wave of booming immigration. Currently, mass legal immigration redistributes the wealth of working and middle class Americans to the country’s top earners.
“Virtually none of that existed in 1900 during the last great wave of immigration, when we also took in a number of poor people. We didn’t have a well-developed welfare state,” Camarota continued:
We’re not going to stop [the welfare state] tomorrow. So in that context, bringing in less educated people who are poor is extremely problematic for public coffers, for taxpayers in a way that it wasn’t in 1900 because the roads weren’t even paved between the cities in 1900. It’s just a totally different world. And that’s the point of the RAISE Act is to sort of bring in line immigration policy with the reality say of a large government … and a welfare state. [Emphasis added]
The immigrants are not all coming to get welfare and they don’t immediately sign up, but over time, an enormous fraction sign their children up. It’s likely the case that of the U.S.-born children of illegal immigrants, more than half are signed up for Medicaid — which is our most expensive program. [Emphasis added]
As Breitbart News has reported, U.S. households headed by foreign-born residents use nearly twice the welfare of households headed by native-born Americans.
Every year the U.S. admits more than 1.5 million foreign nationals, with the vast majority deriving from chain migration. In 2017, the foreign-born population reached a record high of 44.5 million. By 2023, the Center for Immigration Studies estimates that the legal and illegal immigrant population of the U.S. will make up nearly 15 percent of the entire U.S. population.
Breitbart News Daily airs on SiriusXM Patriot 125 weekdays from 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. Eastern.
John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on Twitter at @JxhnBinder.
White House wanted to release asylum seekers into Sanctuary Cities
The Trump administration proposed releasing immigrant detainees onto the streets of “sanctuary cities”--including San Francisco-- on at least two occasions within the past six months as retribution against the president’s political enemies, The Washington Post reported, citing unnamed Department of Homeland Security officials and emails.
The proposal was first floated in November amid reports of a large migrant caravan from Central America making its way to the southern border. The other time it was considered-- in February-- occurred during a standoff between Trump and Democrats over border wall funding.
It was rejected both times by immigration agencies, the report said. A Nov. 16 email from the White House to officials at several agencies reportedly asked whether migrants could be arrested and bused to “small-and mid-sized sanctuary cities” and other Democratic strongholds.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s district in San Francisco was considered one of the areas targeted, according to the paper. Pelosi blasted the plan Thursday, calling it “despicable” to use “human beings — including little children — as pawns in their warped game to perpetuate fear and demonize immigrants.”
What is Pelosi's beef? Releasing detainees into sanctuary cities is the opposite of fear mongering. Won't the detainees be safer there than they would be in a city without sanctuary protections?
Don't city officials make a huge deal about being "welcoming" to all people? So now, when it comes time to put their city budget where their mouth is, they get cold feet and start talking about "fear" and "demonizingt" immigrants?
Listen children, this is politics in the age of Trump - no holds barred, in your face, smash mouth, ram it down your throat politics. Trump has shown he can play that game as well as the Democrats. For Pelosi and the left to call "foul" on Trump is hypocritical.
But Pelosi's right, of course. It's a "warped" idea. And the immigration bureaucracy declined the opportunity to stick it to Democrats and sanctuary cities. But the game has changed and Democrats have been put on notice that even those who pretend to be nice guys, won't win much in the way of power and influence.
It's time to go to the mattresses and take no prisoners.
MEX MURDERS MOTHER IN PELOSI, FEINSTEIN, KAMALA
HARRIS, GAVIN NEWSOM'S ! SANCTUARY ! CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO!
Steinle’s
murderer, Jose Zarate and been deported 5xs!
*
"While walking with her father on a pier
in San Francisco in 2015, Steinle was shot by the illegal alien. Steinle
pleaded with her father to not let her die, but she soon passed in her father’s
arms."
*
In the last two years, ICE officers made
266,000 arrests of aliens with criminal records, including those charged or
convicted of 100,000 assaults, 30,000 s ex crimes, and 4,000 violent k illings.
Over the years, thousands of Americans have been brutally k illed by those who
illegally entered our country, and thousands more lives will be lost if we
don't act right now.
STEALING AMERICA!
Here’s how California
surrendered to Mexico… OR WAS HANDED TO MEXICO BY NANCY PELOSI, DIANNE FEINSTEIN,
KAMALA HARRIS, JERRY BROWN and GAVIN NEWSOM!
“It’s almost impossible
to get convicted in this city,” said [Sgt. Kevin] Healy, who works in the
Police Department’s narcotics division. “The message needs to be sent that
it’s not OK to be selling drugs. It’s not allowed anywhere else. Where else can
you walk up to someone you don’t know and purchase crack and heroin?
Is there such a place?”…
Police say drug dealers
from the East Bay ride BART into San Francisco every day to prey on the
addicts slumped on our sidewalks, and yet the city that claims to
so desperately want to help those addicts often looks the other way.
Steinle’s
murderer, Jose Zarate and been deported 5xs!
"While walking with her father on a pier
in San Francisco in 2015, Steinle was shot by the illegal alien. Steinle
pleaded with her father to not let her die, but she soon passed in her father’s
arms."
What will it take? Another two years? Another 19 hardened Democrat lawyers and 40 professional staffers? Another 500 witnesses? Another 50 million dollars spent, 2,800 subpoenas, 500 search warrants?
After almost three years of being saturated in a unending tsunami of every form of media, academic, and entertainment venues, after almost three years of pronouncements of daily imminent and incontrovertible proof of Trumpian "collusion," we finally have a report that tells us, Never mind, nothing here to look at, go about your business, forget you were ever led to believe otherwise. This shock is as great as the shock felt by the adoring Hillary crowd that predicted her overwhelming "landslide" victory in her run for president. So sure, but so wrong...twice.
Why is there no media coverage of what the Clintons were involved in? Selling access for contributions to the Clinton Foundation, commonly known as "pay for play." The Democrats selling the rights to Russian oligarchs for North American uranium. Bill getting $500,000 for a 20-minute speech to a hedge fund. Signing a treaty with Iran that imperils our future and freeing up the Iranians' previously blocked assets so they can support insurgent organizations like Hamas and Fatah, who kill Jews, Christians, and American soldiers whenever and wherever they can. How about Hillary bleaching her server? Violently destroying her phones, having a private email server over which confidential messages were sent and received?
The real collusion was Democrat collusion, starting with Steele's phony and salacious dossier, filled with falsehoods and a moving curtain of lies invented by the Russian FSB (AKA KGB), purchased with Clinton's $165,000 passed through a DNC Washington law firm to fool FISA judges four times to bring innocent citizens to their knees and financial ruin. A DOJ and FBI infiltrated by rogue high-ranking officials who were committed to doing anything in their power to change an election, and if that plan failed, they planned an "insurance policy" to have Trump impeached at worst or impeded and powerless at best.
If it's true that Putin had in mind using a Trump Tower in Moscow to boost his prestige and easing of tensions between our two countries as being mutually beneficial, then explain to me why, once Trump ratcheted up the sanctions on Russia, Putin did not either surreptitiously or obviously allow evidence to come forward that would be damaging to Trump if, in fact, Trump is a Putin puppet.
Like the jurors in the O.J. trial, except to opposite effect — who would not under any conditions, video included, with O.J. smiling and waving at the camera holding a bloody knife in his hands, have found him guilty — the MSM just choose to ignore the Mueller report because it didn't deliver the promise they thought had been made — and that they were so sure would be delivered.
As to immigration, the mantra is, "We need a president who builds bridges, not walls, who recognizes that immigrants built this country, and who understands that diversity and dissent are part of the fabric of our democracy."
Walls are what our houses are made of, not bridges. Walls are what separate honest and law-abiding citizens from freeloaders, thieves, gang members, and drug-dealers. Leave your door unlocked from now on if you really believe that, after all, a door is a kind of wall, isn't it? The fabric of democracy is being rent by a "no border, everyone is welcome" policy. Our American identity cannot survive a continuous and unabated wave of illegal aliens. Is there a concrete number after which we can stop admitting them? Ten million? Twenty million? Why not 50 million? Why not just close up shop in Ecuador, and El Salvador, and some bordering Mexican states, and bring them all here? When is enough enough?
No comments:
Post a Comment