The Democrats: A Corrupt, Insane Posse Masquerading as a Political Party
Eleven years ago, the writer Michael Walsh wrote (under his penname David Kahane) “Think of the Democratic Party as it really is: a criminal organization masquerading as a political party.”
After the Democrats’ Russia, Kavanaugh, Mueller, and Ukraine fiascos, the Iowa caucus debacle, and Friday’s bizarre Democratic debate, I think we need to update it: It’s a Criminal, Insane Posse masquerading as a political party.
The week began with an outstanding, uplifting, and inspiring State of the Union address by the President before a joint Congress. Among the House delegates were a gaggle of Democratic congresswomen dressed in white who insist they are strong, independent, capable, and worthy to lead. They stood, clapped, or sat in unison at signals from Speaker Pelosi who sat behind the President, mouthing words to some imaginary friend and moving her mouth reminiscent of someone on psychotropic drugs. (Message: I am woman -- hear me meow chasing the laser red dot.) At the conclusion of the speech she stood and ripped up her copy of the SOTU address in small packets either because she lacked strength to rip it all in one batch or for dramatic effect. To say the Democrats’ behavior was disconsonant with any message of sober adult solons is to understate it.
The following day, the Senate voted down the House’s absurd impeachment effort, after which the President gave a heartfelt address to all those in the House and Senate who had helped him in exposing the fact-free, corrupt House effort to overturn the 2016 election by ousting him from office. If you missed it, here’s a video of it. He was gracious and thankful to all those who stood by him, something Republicans are not known to do as soon as Democrats hurl charges, no matter how patently flimsy and partisan those charges are. For once, Republicans didn’t flee the forum for fear of spotting their white togas when the jackals appeared. (I suppose when much of the media described the address the address as “dark,” they meant the pushover Republican days were over for them and their party of choice.)
The App that Failed
And then there was the Iowa Caucus, the results of which are unclear -- did Sanders or Buttigieg win? Will the DNC chair who is about to leave that slot with a big bonus persuade Iowa to recanvas or will they give him the back of their hand? Only the Shadow apparently knows… Although it is clear that Warren and Biden lost.
Over at the Wall Street Journal, James Freeman explains the genesis of the App that failed. “Veterans of Hillary Clinton’s failed 2016 presidential campaign” who for some reason were considered “gurus at this sort of thing“ created the app. (Professor Kevin Gutzman reminds us: ”Robbie Mook, the Hillary staffer who laughed at Bill Clinton when he said Hillary needed to go to Michigan and Wisconsin in the 2016 campaign’s final days, is the fellow responsible for the app that didn’t work in Iowa.”)
Their outfit, Shadow, in turn was supported by a firm called Acronym, Acronym is a “non-profit” run by Tara McGowan, continues Freeman. Certainly not by coincidence, McGowan “oversaw the $42 million digital program in 2016 for Priorities USA, the primary super PAC for Hillary Clinton.” Among the hotshot coders Shadow engaged “was a prep cook for Starbucks.”
Why was Shadow hired to do this? Connections.
David Burge, Iowahawk, tweeted the contract chain:
Keep in mind whenever you donate to a political party or movement, this is where your money goes -- to make sure Senator McDreamy’s nephew’s roommate gets his piece of the takeI know there are Bernians who see the app as a Machiavellian technoplot to fix the vote, but the truth is much more likely a bunch of Hillary campaign wunderkinds decided to cosplay as a Silicon Valley startup, and everybody was afraid to say they were in way over their headsWhere you come from, the software salesman isn’t your boss who says you better damn well buy it if you know what’s good for you.
Vice, like Iowahawk seems to think that the coders were working off an App Coding for Dummies book.
It’s not clear that this simple and likely explanation for the app that failed will persuade Sanders’ followers. After all, he was cheated in 2016 and the people whose app seem to have cheated him out of a clear victory in Iowa and momentum going on to New Hampshire were intimately connected to Hillary Clinton.
Of course, you can ignore the app’s factual genesis and look elsewhere for blame. Sheila Jackson Lee, B.A. Yale JD U Va, whose gerrymandered district looks like a gaping shark’s mouth, suggested that Russia was responsible for the crashing App in Iowa.
Rachel Maddow blamed the weird message board 4 Chan.
As for me -- I’m sticking with graft and incompetence, the usual Democratic Party’s operational mode.
Burning Bernie
Professor Charles Lipson explains why the Sanders supporters have reason to doubt the fairness of their opposition in the Democratic establishment:
The Democrats’ nominating process increases the likelihood of a contested convention -- and a nasty fight with Bernie and his supporters. The party discarded the traditional, Anglo-American system, where each state’s winner receives all its delegates. Instead, they chose a European-style system in which each candidate wins a fraction of the delegates proportional to his share of the vote. The Anglo-American system produces clear winners and losers. The European system doesn’t. It includes all factions in Parliament, where the leading party tries to assemble a governing coalition.Democrats’ problem is that they are not trying to form an inclusive, coalition government. They are trying to pick a nominee, but they are doing it with a system that was never designed to produce a single, decisive winner. Oops.If the convention is contested, elected delegates will be joined by “super delegates,” starting on the first or second ballot, depending on the convention rules. Who are these super delegates? They are quintessential insiders, mostly state and local elected officials. There is absolutely no way they will jeopardize their own fiefdoms by choosing Bernie or any other socialist.Their refusal will produce a bitter clash if Bernie arrives in Milwaukee with millions of votes and millions of donors. If he actually holds a plurality of elected delegates and is passed over anyway, the fight will degenerate into trench warfare. Remember, Bernie knows this is his last rodeo, and he has zero loyalty to the party. Remember, too, that his default speaking style is “really angry,” interspersed with “damned mad.” If that’s how Bernie and his supporters leave the convention, it’s hard to see a Democratic path to victory.The party’s best outcome would be for Bernie to lose decisively in both the primary vote and delegate count -- so decisively that his followers believe the process was fair and the nominee legitimate. A bad outcome would be an inconclusive primary contest, where Bernie did well but lost at the convention.Worst of all would be one where Bernie arrived with the most votes and delegates but fell short of a majority and came away empty-handed. He would blame party leaders and their back-room deals to benefit billionaires, corporations, and corrupt politicians. If that happens, the party will be in real trouble. Bernie will scream, Trump will exploit the divisions, and left-wing voters will spend November 3 in a purple haze, eating Ben and Jerry’s. What they won’t do is trudge to the polls and vote Democratic.
The Democratic “Debate”
I confess, by week’s end I lacked enough patience to watch the Democrats’ debate on Friday night, and contented myself with reading about it from trusted observers. The actor James Woods is back from a year-long jailing by Twitter, and bounced back having lost none of his acid wit:
“The #Democrats have cheated elections for so long, they can’t even elect themselves... #IowaCaucusDisaster
-- James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) February 7, 2020”
Pete Buttigieg seems to have mastered the art of glibly speaking meaningless word salads (an Obama mode). So much that Sundance cleverly satirized him:
Sample Mayor Pete quote:"The consequential moments that we face are moments of great consequence we must face; and when facing those moments we must think of the great consequence behind these faces or we will fail to be great..."sarcastically: Yup. The consequential moments that we face are moments of great consequence we must face; and when facing those moments we must think of the great consequence behind these faces or we will fail to be great...
:::crowd cheers:::
Stage crew looks around: "Huh, what the?.."-- TheLastRefuge (@TheLastRefuge2) February 8, 2020
“If you take a step back and really think about what they’re saying in this debate it’s fricking bonkers stuff. Like really beyond crazy.’
Josh Holmes:
"It used to be over-the-top parody to say that Democrats want free healthcare for illegal immigrants and felons to be voting from their cells it’s now a consensus position among their leading Presidential candidates."
Greg Price:
“Elizabeth Warren says we need "race-conscious laws." Think about that. Isn't that what we spent so long trying to make sure we didn't have? #DemDebate”
Tom Maguire tweets:
“Physicists have theorized on the manner in which some stars collapse inward and then go super-nova. The Dem party may give us a lab experiment in 2020.”
Maybe so. Some viewing the weak field of Democratic contenders are placing their bets on another old White Male Hope -- the latecomer, billionaire Michael Bloomberg. He spent $20 million in Iowa to garner 20 votes. If he seriously campaigns from now to the election, and maintains that spending pattern, I think he’d still lose but it would be a bigger boon for the economy, especially Democrat coders, consultants, pilots of private planes, and ad agencies, than any other stimulus package I can imagine. The press will love that, as well. Trump has proven that clever use of social media makes it unnecessary for a candidate with a saleable message to keep them alive by paying them a fortune for ads no one watches. But if Bloomberg thinks $1 million per vote is a great campaign plan, who would complain?
‘Profiles in Corruption’ Hits #1 on NYT Bestseller List
3:01
The bombshell investigatory blockbuster Profiles in Corruption: Abuse of Power by America’s Progressive Elite has hit number one on the New York Times bestseller list.
Profiles in Corruption, based on over a year and a half of research by Breitbart News senior contributor and Government Accountability Institute (GAI) President Peter Schweizer and his team of investigators, details the past conduct and little-known ties of several prominent progressive leaders. Those include former Vice President Joe Biden, Mayor Eric Garcetti, and Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Cory Booker (D-NJ), Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Kamala Harris (D-CA) and Sherrod Brown (D-OH).
The revelations in Schweizer’s investigative work are backed by 1,126 endnotes, totaling 83 pages of source material. Some of those revelations include:
- Joe Biden’s Brother Frank Linked to Projects Receiving $54,000,000 in Taxpayer Loans from the Obama Administration—Despite No Experience by Haris Alic
- Hunter Biden’s Firms Scored Reportedly Hundreds of Millions from Russians, Chinese, and Kazakhs by Kristina Wong
- Elizabeth Warren Made Millions Helping Corporations Evade Their Pension and Healthcare Obligations by Hannah Bleau
- Amy Klobuchar Selectively Prosecuted White-Collar Crimes, Failed to Pursue Massive Ponzi Scheme—Despite Evidence by Haris Alic
- Book Bombshell: James Biden’s Firm Got $1.5 Billion in Government Contracts Despite Zero Experience by Haris Alic
- Joe Biden’s Sister Valerie Sent Millions of Joe’s Campaign Dollars to Her Own Consulting Firm by Hannah Bleau
- Book Bombshell: Start-up Linked to Hunter Biden’s Firm Bagged $3 Million from Government Program Run by Biden Adviser by Haris Alic
- Elizabeth Warren’s Daughter Amelia Piggybacked off Mom to Cash In on Corporate Contracts by Hannah Bleau
- Klobuchar Received Thousands from Corporations While Introducing Legislation That Benefitted Them by Haris Alic
- Breaking Bombshell: Elizabeth Warren’s Son-in-Law Produced Film Funded by Iranian Government by Kristina Wong
- ‘I Don’t Believe in Charities’: Book Exposes Bernie Sanders’ Beef Against Charities by Hannah Bleau
- Joe Biden Helped Launch Business for Son-in-Law from the Oval Office, Repeatedly Briefed Investors Privately by Haris Alic
Profiles in Corruption edged out A Very Stable Genius on the New York Times bestseller list, which was penned by two Washington Post reporters.
Establishment media TV outlets have largely ignored the findings exposed in Profiles in Corruption and have failed to question the presidential candidates covered in the book on their past conduct.
The critical element required is a pattern
of criminal or racketeering activity. This pattern is proved by showing
two predicate crimes were committed within ten years. The list of predicate crimes is extensive and
includes bribery, embezzlement, fraud, theft, money laundering, and obstruction
of justice.
The list of predicate crimes is extensive and includes bribery, embezzlement,
fraud, theft, money laundering, and obstruction of justice.
Secretary Hillary Clinton and the Deep State: A RICO Criminal
Conspiracy
It’s About Corruption –
Replacing a Failed and Corrupt Political Establishment
The Most Egregious Series
of 'Corrupt Acts' Ever
Now
for the bad stuff. In February 1996, a Chinese Long March 3B rocket carrying a
Loral-built Intelsat 708 satellite crashed just after liftoff and killed or
injured at least sixty people in a nearby village.
The Clinton Looting of the Poor of Haiti
FROM DAY ONE THE CLINTONS HAVE BEEN A CRIME TIDAL WAVE!
Anatomy of a Clinton Scam
TOGETHER,
WE CONTINUE PUTTING PEOPLE FIRST
Our Russia Collusion Nightmare: All Hillary's Fault?
Clinton Foundation bleeding money
with no Clintons in high office
The list
of predicate crimes is extensive and includes bribery,
embezzlement, fraud, theft, money laundering, and obstruction of justice.
Secretary Hillary Clinton and the Deep State: A RICO Criminal
Conspiracy
The critical element required is a pattern
of criminal or racketeering activity. This pattern is proved by showing
two predicate crimes were committed within ten years. The list of predicate crimes is extensive and
includes bribery, embezzlement, fraud, theft, money laundering, and obstruction
of justice.
The list of predicate crimes is extensive and includes bribery, embezzlement,
fraud, theft, money laundering, and obstruction of justice.
Secretary Hillary Clinton and the Deep State: A RICO Criminal
Conspiracy
We who elected President
Trump understood our elected officials and the Deep State were sandbagging Trump and self-dealing
public funds. It was no secret that President Trump is no angel,
unpresidential, blunt, and crude, and a disruptor. Trump was hired to drain the
swamp.
I watched this kabuki theater unfold over the
last several years. Through my eyes as a shopworn gumshoe, I will explain what
is happening. My investigative curiosity was first piqued by the ATF Fast and
Furious scandal and continues through the recent House impeachment show trial.
There is a common element running through all of these cons —
the actions of an organized crime conspiracy. A group of people
either acting alone or in concert with others committed crimes with a common
purpose - a criminal enterprise as described in
"CRIMINAL RICO: 18 USC. §§1961-1968 A
Manual For Federal Prosecutors."
The players acted
together – in the usurpation of power, the abuse of power by public officials,
bribery, thefts by fraud including federal funds, money laundering, perjury and
the obstruction of justice, the violations of fundamental of civil rights,
aided and abetted in the commission of these crimes and or to conceal these
crimes. Criminals will lie and can't keep their lies straight. Their methods
and behaviors are the same, whether engaging in street crimes or elaborate
white-collar financial schemes. The only difference is when more money is
involved, the perps are more adept in concealing, covering up their sins, and
hiding where the money went. Many of these scandals are well known to the American
Thinker readers. I will focus my comments on Hillary's home brew
sever and the Clinton Foundation as an example of how RICO can be used to
prosecute the players.
FBI Director James Comey
indicted Hillary Clinton for her home brew server at his press conference.
Comey then egregiously concluded that there was no evidence of criminal intent
purportedly “required” to prosecute. Comey bastardized the Federal Espionage Act in absolving
Hillary Clinton. FBI's investigation of Clinton's emails was low-balled. There
was never a real search for the truth. The outcome was preordained. My jaw
dropped wide open. I knew the fix was in. FBI Director Comey lied to the people
with a straight face. Why?
The chance meeting of
Bill Clinton and AG Loretta Lynch on the airport tarmac was no mere
coincidence. This chat was not about the grandkids. Bill Clinton was there to
convey a specific message to Lynch that there would be no indictment of
Hillary. Hillary Clinton's email case must tank. This would have
constituted bribery, if AG Lynch was assured she would continue as AG in
Clinton Administration. This meeting took place only weeks before Comey's press
conference dumping Hillary Clinton's email case.
The Deep State needed
Hillary Clinton to win the 2016 presidential election, or the dike holding back
the truth would burst. Trump, the disruptor, was an immediate threat to both
the Republicans, Democrats, and the Deep State. If the truth were
laid bare, it would expose the Obama Administration, Hillary Clinton, the
Senate and House, and many executive departments for these abuses of power,
corruption, bribery, frauds, and thefts of public funds.
High-level government
officials and the Deep State committed many serious felonies either in
furtherance of or to conceal the crimes committed in the pay to play scam.
In exchange for favorable consideration by Secretary Clinton, those who
benefited would donate to the Clinton Foundation. The FBI
started and stopped investigations into the Clinton Foundation at least twice
as reported by the Washington Post. Peter Schweizer's book, Clinton Cash, is the most damning. Dinesh D'Souza slammed the
Foundation in the National Review, as did The Federalist.
The status of the investigation of the Foundation
by US Attorney John Huber's is unknown. Rudy Giuliani said there was enough to
pursue "Clinton Inc" as
racketeering under RICO. The Foundation and its affiliated nonprofits require a real
investigation with an in-depth forensic audit to determine where the money
went. In financial crimes investigation, the prime rule is "follow the
money, honey." Illicit nonprofits have many ways to divert funds by
inflating salaries, expenses, and money laundering.
Illegal nonprofit schemes
are difficult to prosecute without hard evidence and the testimony of insiders.
The motive of Hillary Clinton's use of the home brew server was to conceal
emails from FOIA requests that would provide the hard evidence. Hillary Clinton
destroyed the data on her server and cell phones with the knowledge of the FBI.
It took years for Judicial Watch and others to pry
and recover some of these damning emails from the foot-dragging executive
departments that were complicit and knew what was going on.
RICO initially was used to
target mob families. RICO is also a useful tool to fight white collar
conspiracies. They both have the same hierarchy of low-level crooks led by the
top players, linked together with a common purpose. RICO has tools to squeeze
the low-level operatives to gather evidence to prosecute, jail, and seize
assets of the conspirators. The critical element required is a pattern
of criminal or racketeering activity. This pattern is proved by showing
two predicate crimes were committed within ten years. The list of predicate crimes is extensive and
includes bribery, embezzlement, fraud, theft, money laundering, and obstruction
of justice. The typical five-year statute of limitations for most
federal felonies is extended to ten years from the last criminal act or acts
committed to conceal the conspiracy, i.e., lying under oath and similar actions
to obstruct justice. The prison sentences are steep. The effect is to cut off the
head of the organization and not just the low-level players.
The criminal activity
extends back to the ATF's Fast and Furious program through the House
impeachment show trial to cover up the illegal acts of the Obama
Administration, Hillary Clinton, the Department of State, the DOJ, the FBI, and
the CIA. A telltale sign that the DOJ under US Attorney General Barr is
willing to play hardball and may use RICO, came when he spoke to the Federalist
Society: "Barr accuses liberal 'resistance' of
trying to 'sabotage' Trump." AG Barr said this, "shows FBI launched Trump campaign
investigation on the 'thinnest of suspicions." AG Barr is the new sheriff in town,
he wears a badge, has guns and will travel, can impanel grand juries, indict
and arrest people, and is not limited in his jurisdiction, like DOJ IG
Horowitz.
The collective actions of
the Deep State are and were a silent coup to delegitimize a Presidential candidate.
Once elected to impede and resist the duly elected President. The President's
law enforcement and intel agencies were corrupted at the highest level and went
rogue.
Organized crime can't
exist without corrupt law enforcement. As I wrote in a letter to President
Trump earlier this year:
. . . I believe you
understand the gravity of the situation and of its importance to the very
survival of our Country as we know it. If the people involved are not held
accountable for their actions, we will be no different than some Third World
Banana Republic.
Failure to act will
destroy our founding principle of the Rule of Law as stated by President John
Adams, "We Are a Nation of Laws, Not of Men" and we cannot allow a
two-tiered justice system to prevail.
Ron Wright is a retired detective from Riverside PD, CA. BA in
political science CSUF, M. Adm. University of Cal, Riverside. Facebook at Ron
T. Cop.
“Our entire crony
capitalist system, Democrat and Republican alike, has become a kleptocracy
approaching par with third-world hell-holes. This is the way a great
country is raided by its elite.” ---- Karen McQuillan AMERICAN
THINKER.com
Peter Schweizer, author of “Secret Empires: How the American
Political Class Hides Corruption and Enriches Family and Friends,”
It’s About Corruption –
Replacing a Failed and Corrupt Political Establishment
American presidents have their famous
speeches, remembered long after they leave office. JFK said: “Ask not what
your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country.” Ronald
Reagan stood at the Brandenburg Gate and told Mikhail Gorbachev to: “Tear
down this wall.”
Some speeches are memorable in other ways.
George W. Bush, days after 9/11, ironically announced that: “Islam is
peace.” Barack Obama proclaimed himself the messiah: “This was the moment
when the rise of the oceans began to slow, and our planet began to heal.”
President Trump has certainly given strong
speeches, such as at the recent March for Life. But he may be remembered more
for his raucous rallies and hilarious tweets. Yet one speech has flown under
the radar.
On Oct. 13, 2016, just weeks before
the election, Trump spoke at a campaign rally in Florida. Leading up to the election,
he was holding several rallies each day, giving numerous speeches, but this
seemingly random speech stands out.
The enigmatic Q group refers to it as the
speech that got Donald Trump elected. As it was one of many pre-election
speeches he gave and at a Florida rally, it may have only been heard by a
fraction of Trump voters before the election, but it certainly encapsulates his
philosophy, both before and after the election, toward government corruption.
The speech explains the resistance by the
Washington, D.C. ruling class to Trump’s candidacy, election, and presidency.
Trump attacked the foundation of deep state power, wealth, and corruption.
Trump was indeed an “existential threat” to the cabal.
Before even being elected, and years
before Joe Biden decided to run for president, Donald Trump was focused on
corruption. Not to influence his reelection, as House Democrats accuse, since
he wasn’t even president yet. But because rooting out corruption was part of
his plan to make America great again.
Everything that followed his election,
from the Russian collusion accusations, White House leaks, special counsel
investigation, and now impeachment, is a reaction to the ideas Trump explains
in this 6-minute speech. Watch it here or read the transcript.
The opening lines are prescient, becoming
painfully obvious now almost four years after he laid out the scale of
corruption.
Our movement is about replacing a failed
and corrupt political establishment with a new government controlled by you,
the American People. There is nothing the political
establishment will not do, and no lie they will
not tell, to hold on to their prestige and power at your expense.
The Washington establishment, and the financial
and media corporations that fund it, exists for only one reason: to protect and
enrich itself.
The establishment has trillions of dollars at
stake in this election. As an example, just one single trade deal they’d like
to pass, involves trillions of dollars controlled by many countries,
corporations and lobbyists.
For those who control the levers of power in
Washington, and for the global special interests they partner with, our
campaign represents an existential threat.
“Protect
and enrich.” This is a perfect encapsulation of the Clinton Foundation and
the Obama book and television deals. Then there is the Biden family corruption,
followed closely behind by similar abuses of power and office by the Warren and
Sanders families, as Peter Schweizer described in his recent book “Profiles in
Corruption.” These names just scratch the surface of government
corruption.
Candidate
Trump then went on to say:
It’s a global power structure that is responsible
for the economic decisions that have robbed our working class, stripped our
country of its wealth, and put that money into the pockets of a handful of
large corporations and political entities.
This
is money given to corrupt foreign countries, disguised as aid, only to be
returned to the political elite by hiring their unqualified family members for
do-nothing jobs, as in Hunter Biden, or funneling these U.S. taxpayer dollars
back into political foundations, consultancies, or campaign contributions.
Once
upon a time, journalists investigated such corruption. Now they ignore it,
aiding and abetting the deception. As Trump said in his speech:
The corporate media in our country is no longer
involved in journalism. They are a political special interest, no different
than any lobbyist or other financial entity with an agenda.
Speak
up against the cabal and you will be destroyed, or even commit suicide. Trump
went on:
The establishment and their media enablers wield
control over this nation through means that are well known. Anyone who
challenges their control is deemed a sexist, a racist, a xenophobe and morally
deformed. They will attack you, they will slander you, they will seek to
destroy your career and reputation. And they will lie, lie and lie even more.
It’s
amazing that Trump predicted exactly what happened a few days ago when
“Republican political strategist” Rick Wilson called the group of “you”
mentioned above, “credulous boomer rubes” with CNN hack Don Lemon laughing so
hard he almost fell off his chair.
President
Trump has been impeached for drawing back the curtain on deep state
malfeasance. Before handing over millions of hard earned U.S. taxpayer dollars
to Ukraine, the most corrupt country in Europe,
he wanted to know the money was necessary and going where promised, rather than
into the pockets of oligarchs and U.S. politician grifters.
He
acted as he was required to under the “Treaty with
Ukraine on mutual legal assistance in criminal matters,” ratified in 2000,
15 years before Trump announced his run for president. He was doing his job,
fulfilling his Constitutional oath of office. His reward for pouring roach
killer in the nest of Democrat crooks and knaves was impeachment and a
concerted effort by Democrats, the media, and nasty NeverTrump Republicans, all
heads on the same toxic hydra, to overturn the last election and rig the next
one.
It’s
not about Trump enriching himself, despite what Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler
say, it’s for the country. Again, from the famous speech:
I didn’t need to do this. I built a great
company, and I had wonderful life. I could have enjoyed the benefits of years
of successful business for myself and my family, instead of going through this
absolute horror show of lies, deceptions and malicious attacks. I’m doing it
because this country has given me so much, and I feel strongly it was my turn
to give back.
It’s
all about corruption, exposing it, rooting it out, and destroying it. Those who
are the most threatened are those who scream the loudest. Given the Democrat
and media apoplexy, Trump must be getting closer to the truth.
He
ended his speech by throwing down the gauntlet:
We will vote to put this corrupt government
cartel out of business. We will remove from our politics the special interests
who have betrayed our workers, our borders, our freedoms, and our sovereign
rights as a nation. We will end the politics of profit, we will end the rule of
special interests, we will put a stop to the raiding of our country – and the
disenfranchisement of our people.
It’s
not about abuse of power or obstruction of Congress. It’s not about quid
pro quo or bribery. It’s simply a new sheriff in town, bringing law
and order to drain a swamp of greed and corruption. It’s President Trump doing
exactly what he said he would do if elected, making America great again.
He
is doing what past presidents have talked about and promised, but then either
looked the other way or became active participants in the graft. And those
milking the system are petrified over exposure and their long overdue
reckoning.
Brian
C. Joondeph, M.D., is a Denver-based physician and freelance writer whose
pieces have appeared in American Thinker, Daily Caller, and other publications.
Follow him on Facebook,
LinkedIn, Twitter,
and QuodVerum.
The Most Egregious Series
of 'Corrupt Acts' Ever
“The evidence points in
the direction of the president inviting Ukraine to engage in the corrupt acts
of investigating a US political opponent,” House manager Adam Schiff told the
U.S. Senate about a thousand times last week.
A master dissembler,
Schiff said whatever he had to in his effort to remove President Trump from
office. However shameful, that was his job. The media had no excuse for
enabling him. Those old enough to remember the Clinton years know what “corrupt
acts” by a sitting president really smell like.
In 1997, the Senate
Committee on Governmental Affairs chaired by Sen. Fred Thompson laid out in
broad terms the scope of corruption that President Bill Clinton orchestrated:
The president and his
aides demeaned the offices of the president and vice president, took advantage of minority
groups, pulled down all the barriers that would normally be in place to keep
out illegal contributions, pressured policy makers, and left themselves open to
strong suspicion that they were selling not only access to high-ranking
officials, but policy as well. Millions of dollars were raised in illegal
contributions, much of it from foreign sources.
Johnny Chung described
the state of affairs a bit more colorfully. “The White House is like a subway,”
he told the Thompson committee. “You have to put in coins to open the gates.”
Chung admitted to funneling $100,000 from the Chinese Military to the
Democratic National Committee.
In the runup to the 1996
election, the Clintons needed every dollar they could extort to rebound from
their own scandalous missteps and the Democratic Party’s drubbing in the 1994
midterms.
I could cite a score of
specific outrages during that campaign, but I will concentrate on one that, as
Schiff was fond of saying, “endangered U.S. national security.” By comparison,
anything the U.S. or the Ukraine suffered as a result of the celebrated funding
“pause” was a trifling inconvenience.
Here are a few of the
other, lesser outrages during that election cycle:
- In February 1996, Clinton met
with with Chinese arms dealer Wang Jun, a meeting greased by a $50,000
donation, a meeting even Clinton would admit was “clearly inappropriate”
but only after Wang Jun’s company was caught flooding California’s inner
cities with illegal semi-automatic weapons.
- In April 1996 Clinton sent
embattled Commerce Secretary Ron Brown to Croatia to broker a sweetheart
deal between the neo-Fascists who ran that country and the Enron Corporation.
- In April 1996, the Clinton White
House sabotaged the investigation into the inexplicable USAF plane crash
that killed Brown and 34 others.
- In July 1996, the White House
orchestrated a cover-up of the accidental missile strike on TWA Flight 800
that killed 230.
- In September 1996 Clinton
“unilaterally” declared a new 1.7 million-acre national monument in
southern Utah, in the process handing his patrons, the Riady family of
Indonesia, a monopoly on the world’s supply of low-sulfur coal.
The Pentagon welcomed the
news. Just a few months earlier, a Chinese military officer had warned American
ambassador Chas Freeman, “If you hit us now, we can hit back. So you will not
make those threats [about Taiwan].”
American technical advice
was making Chinese missile rattling more than an empty threat. And yet in their
relentless drive to raise money, the Clintons were fully prepared to broker
that advice.
A month after the Long
March’s failure, Clinton signed off on a “decision memorandum” that countered
the State Department recommendations, voided Pentagon veto power, and awarded
authority over satellite-export licensing to the deeply compromised Ron Brown
at Commerce. Said an attached memo, ‘‘Industry should like the fact that they
will deal with the more ‘user friendly’ Commerce system.’’
Soon after the Long March
failure Loral CEO Bernard Schwartz dispatched a review team to China to assess
the damage and suggest refinements. Schwartz paid for the privilege. In the
1996 cycle he gave $632,000 to the president’s reelection effort and emerged as
the single largest donor to the Democratic Party.
A House Select Committee
on National Security would later describe Schwartz’s actions as “an unlicensed
defense service for the PRC that resulted in the improvement of the reliability
of the PRC’s military rockets and ballistic missiles.”
So serious was the
offense that in 1998 the Criminal Division of the Justice Department launched
an investigation. Incredibly, while the investigation was in process, Sandy
Berger, Clinton fixer and national security advisor, sent a memo to the
president urging him to “waive the legislative restriction on the export to
China of the communications satellites and related equipment for the Space
Systems/Loral (SS/L) Chinasat 8 project.”
This waiver would present
a huge problem for the prosecution. Berger admitted as much: “Justice believes
that a jury would not convict once it learned that the president had found
SS/L’s Chinasat 8 project to be in the national interest.”
But Berger was not about
to let that stop him: “We will take the firm position that this waiver does not
exonerate or in any way prejudge SS/L with respect to its prior unauthorized
transfers to China.” Berger was blowing smoke, and he knew it. A waiver would
make prosecution all but impossible.
The president could only
issue a waiver, however, if it served America’s “national interest.” Berger
made a comically specious case that it did, arguing satellite technology would
give remote Chinese villagers access “to people and ideas in democratic
societies.”
For its part, Loral had
no greater cause than its own bottom line. “If a decision is not forthcoming in
the next day or so, we stand to lose the contract,” Loral lobbyist Thomas Ross
wrote Berger. “In fact, even if the decision is favorable, we will lose
substantial amounts of money with each passing day.”
So much for the national
interest. Ross then added the kicker, sure to win the president’s heart.
“Bernard Schwartz had intended to raise this issue with you at the Blair
dinner, but missed you in the crowd.” Schwartz knew he had a friend in the
White House. The president approved the waiver, and the prosecution came to
naught.
Democrats like Jerry
Nadler and Nancy Pelosi were in Congress for all of this. Schiff was there for
the tail end. If they were really concerned about acts that “endangered U.S.
national security” they would have moved to impeach the traitor themselves.
Jack Cashill’s new novel, The Hunt, a political thriller co-authored with Mike
McMullen, is widely available. Signed first editions can be had at
www.TheHuntBook.com.
Clinton Foundation Put On Watch List Of Suspicious ‘Charities’
"But
what the Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of
the American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power,
use it to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and
venal. Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear
to every person on the planet by now." ---- Patricia
McCarthy
HILLARY
& BILLARY: The Evita and Juan Peron of Wall Street
The Clinton Looting of the Poor of Haiti
“The couple parlayed lives supposedly
spent in “public service”
into admission into the upper stratosphere of American wealth, with incomes in
the top 0.1 percent bracket. The source of this vast wealth was a political
machine that might well be dubbed “Clinton, Inc.” This consists essentially of
a seedy money-laundering operation to ensure big business support for the
Clintons’ political ambitions as well as their personal fortunes. The basic
components of the operation are lavishly paid speeches to Wall Street and
Fortune 500 audiences, corporate campaign contributions, and donations to the
ostensibly philanthropic Clinton Foundation.”
into admission into the upper stratosphere of American wealth, with incomes in
the top 0.1 percent bracket. The source of this vast wealth was a political
machine that might well be dubbed “Clinton, Inc.” This consists essentially of
a seedy money-laundering operation to ensure big business support for the
Clintons’ political ambitions as well as their personal fortunes. The basic
components of the operation are lavishly paid speeches to Wall Street and
Fortune 500 audiences, corporate campaign contributions, and donations to the
ostensibly philanthropic Clinton Foundation.”
IT
WAS BILL CLINTON WHO UNLEASHED WALL STREET’S BIGGEST CRIMINAL BANKSTERS…. And haven’t
they sucked up the banksters’ gratuities since?
Only
Barack Obama has serviced banksters more than Hillary and Billary!
“Clinton also failed to mention how
he and Hillary cashed in after his presidential tenure to
make themselves multimillionaires, in part by taking tens of
millions in speaking fees from Wall Street bankers.”
FROM DAY ONE THE CLINTONS HAVE BEEN A CRIME TIDAL WAVE!
Anatomy of a Clinton Scam
“The bigger the lie, the more likely the buy-in” -- that must be
the theory underlying a plan relentlessly executed by Bill and Hillary Clinton
to suck money from the public in support of a supposed “charity” currently
known as “Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation.”
Unlike the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation that was originally
funded primarily by the Gates family, the Clinton Foundation was meant to take
money from the general public, and from governments.
So, affairs of the Clinton Foundation were never supposed to be
directed by the Clinton family. But public records apparently prove that strict
rules governing the conduct of public charities are not applied when it comes
to long-time “public servants” such as the Clintons.
Incorporated but not Organized
Incorporated on Oct. 23, 1997, just as word started to leak of
Bill Clinton’s dalliance with Monica Lewinsky and while doubts crested
concerning foreign funding for the Clinton legal defense effort, the main
Clinton charity was originally named “The William J. Clinton Presidential
Foundation” in papers filed with the Arkansas Secretary of State by three
lawyers.
However, to qualify for federal tax-exemption, a charity must be
formally organized not simply by lawyers but by, at least three truly
independent directors, who needed to adopt articles of incorporation and bylaws
in a formal organizational meeting before the entity conducted official operations.
Bylaws for this entity may not have been formally adopted by initial directors
(referred to as “Trustees”) until Dec. 23, 1997 as you can see for yourself by
reviewing these materials available through the main Clinton Foundation website.
A reasonable question to ask is: what did “The William J. Clinton
Presidential Foundation” do, if anything, prior to adopting bylaws, and how did
they accomplish these actions before becoming formally ''organized ``?
“Formless aggregations of individuals” are not “organizations”
Well before Dec. 23, 1997, Clinton allies laid groundwork required
to erect the Clinton Foundation in a portion of Little Rock that had long been
run-down, depressing local property values.
However, the IRS explains that only “organizations” are eligible for exemption from
taxes, not “formless aggregations of individuals”:
“An individual, partnership, or formless aggregation of
individuals, however, cannot qualify for exemption under IRC 501(c)(3). If it
is determined that no organization exists, the applicant will be advised that
no ruling or determination letter can be issued [emphasis added].”
Newspaper accounts, court records and other publicly available
information show that early efforts on behalf of the “Clinton Foundation” were
not conducted in corporate form, but instead loosely and informally,
chiefly by Clinton political supporters.
“[Little Rock] Mayor Dailey said he received word from Skip
Rutherford, local coordinator for the Presidential Library at 7:00 AM, that
President and Mrs. Clinton has selected the site along the Arkansas River in
Little Rock as the location for the proposed William Jefferson Clinton
Presidential Library [emphasis added].”
In this C-SPAN clip, Rutherford is clearly seen explaining
widespread activities carried out through Nov. 7, 1997:
In 1997, and for years afterward, Bill and Hillary Clinton were
not lawfully designated directors, trustees, officers, or agents of the
purported legal entity that was supposed to operate the presidential library
and research center only in Little Rock.
How did Bill and Hillary Clinton have lawful authority to pick the
site for Bill’s presidential library?
Moreover, did The William J. Clinton Presidential Foundation even
exist as a lawfully organized corporate entity in 1997?
Admissions Against Interest
Under siege late in 1997, in 1998, and then safely through the
Impeachment trial by early 1999, the Clinton team must have been sure that
loyal elements within the Arkansas Attorney General’s office, the Internal
Revenue Service and the U.S. Attorney General’s office would never prosecute
those responsible for operating the Clinton Foundation illegally so long as the
Clintons remained resident inside the White House.
Though required to do so, the Clinton Foundation never filed an
informational return (on Form 990, or 990EZ) for the “short period” from Oct.
23, 1997 through Dec. 31, 1997. This is important because, somehow, the Clinton
Foundation acquired financial resources sufficient to pay lawyers and fund
operations starting late in October. And a key unanswered question remains:
“who advanced them the money?”
In a report to Michigan government authorities, filed in July
1998, Rutherford explained why the Clinton Foundation did not file an IRS Form
990 or 990EZ for 1997 because:
“The organization [was] not in existence last fiscal year--[Not Applicable]
[emphasis added].”
In the second informational return the Clinton Foundation
ultimately did file with the IRS for 1999, on Nov. 20, 2000, an officer of the
entity admitted, under penalties of perjury:
“The Foundation began operations in 1998 [emphasis added] and is
in the early stages of raising funds to meet the exempt purposes. Program
development is in the very early planning stage and no significant program
service expenses have been incurred.”
So, The William J. Clinton Presidential Foundation did not exist
in 1997, even as elements within the IRS rushed to grant federal tax-exemption
to the entity back to Oct. 23, 1997 as this “Determination Letter,” found on the Clinton Foundation website clearly states.
Times were certainly different from 1997 through 2000, but we
remember when the IRS rigorously and ruthlessly enforced key charity laws and regulations under President Obama.
Are former Presidents above the law?
Stillborn in 1997, the Clinton Foundation has managed to grow into
a network of entities, none of which has ever lawfully been organized or
operated. This allegation is now supported by some 200 podcasts, averaging two hours in length each, most of which are
accompanied by pull-down slide presentations that readily take viewers and
should take investigators into details of what seems to be the largest set of
unprosecuted charity frauds in history:
Bob Mueller, James Comey and Rod Rosenstein may have “missed” the
early development of this scam, from 2001 through 2005 when the FBI and DOJ “investigated” the Clinton Foundation as these redacted records reveal.
And, on the 10th anniversary of devastating disasters that
flattened portions of Haiti, Hillary Clinton actually crowed about US Attorney
John Huber’s unconfirmed decision to wind down the latest “investigation” of
potential Clinton Foundation crimes:
This week, the Justice Department determined that the
lies that were peddled about me, my family, & @ClintonFdn are without merit.
I couldn’t be more grateful to everyone that stuck with us while we continued to focus on the work. Let’s keep going.
https://bbis.clintonfoundation.org/2020/annual-fund-m …
I couldn’t be more grateful to everyone that stuck with us while we continued to focus on the work. Let’s keep going.
https://bbis.clintonfoundation.org/2020/annual-fund-m …
TOGETHER,
WE CONTINUE PUTTING PEOPLE FIRST
The Clinton Foundation’s
record of exploiting natural disasters to source funds for which they never
account is as long as it is shameless.
Americans across the
political spectrum must push our government authorities to hold operators of
the Clinton charity scam network to account.
“Bleachbit” notwithstanding,
overwhelming evidence of unprosecuted charity frauds dating to Oct. 23, 1997
hides in plain sight
Check applicable laws, then
check facts for yourselves and remember these words from John Adams:
“Facts
are stubborn things [emphasis added]; and whatever may be our wishes, our
inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of
facts and evidence.”
During the 2016 election
cycle, the mainstream media failed to probe the heart of the more recent Clinton Foundation scandal --
how the Clinton family may have exploited Hillary’s position as Secretary of
State and her standing as presidential frontrunner through November 2016.
Building fortunes through
operating charities is a monstrous affront to decent, law-abiding people of all
political persuasions, so it is not a partisan thing, here, to attack the
Clintons for their known public record of transgressions.
In fact, a better question
might be to wonder why Democrats, including Bernie Sanders, are not much more
insistent that ongoing Clinton charity scams be fully exposed, and aggressively
prosecuted by state, federal and foreign governments.
Our Russia Collusion Nightmare: All Hillary's Fault?
The biggest political scandal in the history of the United
States. Three years of constant lies told by government agents, political
operatives, and deceitful news personalities. Thousands of hours of
criminal investigative interviews; thousands of written stories and television
segments; thousands of leaks and insinuations and threats. All to
take down the legitimately elected American president, Donald J. Trump.
Now that some light is finally revealing just how rotten this
whole nonsense has been from the very beginning, the most maddening aspect of
all is the one thing not said nearly enough: every bit of this frame-up job to
hang the American president for being a Russian agent and traitor to his nation
began as a way to inoculate Hillary Clinton from her largest political
vulnerabilities going into the 2016 campaign.
Aside from her questionable health and a lifetime of scandal,
Hillary had two sizable liabilities (of her own creation) that threatened her
ability to win the general election: (1) her use of the Clinton Foundation as a
vehicle for laundering bribes from foreign governments and moneyed interests
and (2) her decision to conduct the business of the State Department (as well
as to discuss our nation's most guarded secrets) on an unsecured private email
server that had been hacked by known and unknown foreign governments and
adverse entities. Peter Schweizer's Clinton Cash did a remarkable
job exposing the Clinton Foundation as a spectacular pay-to-play operation that
had allowed Hillary to trade the powers of her office for personal
aggrandizement (including the sale of 20% of America's uranium to Russia for,
among other things, $145 million transferred to her foundation). And
even though the Obama Justice Department was doing its best to minimize the
revelation of Hillary's gross breach of national security and slow-walk any
repercussions, the American people were discovering that life-and-death secrets
had been entrusted to a person with such disregard for our well-being that she
stored them on a personal server in a downstairs bathroom.
For a normal person with a modicum of ethical concern, sense of
shame, or patriotic duty, these crimes would have been more than sufficient to
prompt withdrawal from an election for the country's highest
office. This type of honest self-reflection and private admission of
guilt is alien to the Clintons, though, so what would have represented
immovable obstacles to anyone else became just another set of political
variables that had to be neutralized in her favor.
I can just imagine the conversation Hillary had with her most
trusted advisers — not the ones with the official titles like Robby Mook and
Brian Fallon, whose chief value lay in their expendable nature and the ease
with which Hillary could roll them up into any unexpected scandal to be
disposed with the trash at a future time of her convenience. I mean
the real group of confidants, the ones who have "the ends justify the
means" tattooed on their souls and have gotten away with more crimes than
we'll ever know. If you're Sid Blumenthal or John Podesta or Cheryl
Mills or Marc Elias or Lanny Davis and you know where some of the bodies are
buried along the spectacular trail of Clinton corruption through the years,
then the prospect of a massive pay-to-play scandal or criminal indictment for
mishandling top-secret intelligence or engaging wittingly or unwittingly in
espionage is just another bump on the long road of progressive relativism and
Clinton nihilism. If Clinton
Cash and FBI investigators come
knocking, you simply accuse all your political opponents of being the real
grifters and foreign agents.
That's exactly what Team Hillary did. They leveled
allegations of criminal bribery at Jeb Bush; they questioned Marco Rubio's
loyalty to the United States; but Donald Trump was the prize. A man
who had spent a lifetime in the exotic world of luxury real estate around the
globe while mixing it up with all kinds of powerful figures in that often shady
world was the ideal mark, and he also happened to be a political novice who the
Democrats universally believed would lose in a landslide of historical
dimensions for political lore long to come. When Paul Manafort
joined his team just before the kickoff to the general election and brought
with him a lifetime of political baggage that included skullduggery around
Russia's zone of interest, it must have seemed as if Christmas had come early
for the Clinton team. (Kind of makes you wonder how coincidental
this unforced error really was.)
And so, after a lifetime in the public eye, starring in a popular
television show, and rubbing elbows with celebrities and politicians of all
stripes, Donald Trump woke up one day to find himself being generally slandered
(and libeled) as a Russian spy by the information merchants who control
America's airwaves and print media. That had to have made him laugh,
considering that the press had spent most of his foray into politics demeaning
him as a greedy capitalist playboy nationalist who selfishly placed America's
interests before those of our common world.
Yes, before John Brennan devised a global espionage ring to frame
President Trump as a national security risk and enable the FBI to open up
counterintelligence investigations into his political associates; before Jim
Comey and Andrew McCabe attested to false information with the FISA Court;
before Robert Mueller put the screws to General Flynn in order to sink a
lifetime defender of America for political purposes; before President Obama
initiated changes to security classification that opened up scurrilous
investigative records on President-Elect Trump to an exponentially greater
number of bureaucrats with partisan motivations; before Susan Rice left an
electronic CYA memorandum at 12:15 P.M. on Inauguration Day of 2017 noting that
Sally Yates and James Clapper and John Brennan and Joe Biden and Jim Comey had
all agreed in the Oval Office with President Obama to continue any
investigations "by the book"; before Samantha Power unmasked hundreds
of names picked up during the course of electronic surveillance that were
deemed to somehow implicate the new president in wrongdoing; even before the
Clinton operatives and Fusion GPS and Christopher Steele first started
composing the fan fiction now known as "the Dossier" — before all of
this and everything else we have been forced to endure for three long years,
there was Hillary Clinton, doing what she and her people know best: accusing
her political opponent of the very crimes she had committed
herself.
As awful as this orchestrated campaign against President Trump has
been, it is absolutely maddening to realize that none of it would have happened
had Hillary Clinton not engaged in one of the greatest pay-for-play operations
in American history while placing our most guarded secrets (as well as the very
lives of our soldiers and civilians) on a silver platter for those governments
and adversaries who wish us the most harm in this world. Three years
of Russian hysteria happened only because of the deep corruption of Hillary
Clinton.
This scheme of political projection and wicked treachery should go
down as a final reminder that America survives today only because President
Trump managed to prevail against the nearly insurmountable wave of our
government's intelligence agencies, the justice system, media propagandists,
and the combined wills of the Democrats and NeverTrump Republicans intending to
swamp him.
Only six percent of the billions of dollars the
"Foundation" takes in goes to charity. The rest subsidizes
the lavish lifestyles of the Clintons and their sycophants; those people who
have sold their souls to rub shoulders with unadulterated power.
Clinton Foundation
Put On Watch List Of Suspicious ‘Charities’
"But what the Clintons do is criminal
because they do it wholly at the expense of the American people. And they feel
thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power, use it to enrich themselves and their
friends. They are amoral, immoral, and venal. Hillary has no core beliefs
beyond power and money. That should be clear to every person on the planet by
now." ---- Patricia McCarthy
Clinton Foundation bleeding money
with no Clintons in high office
The Bill,
Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation can no longer raise enough money to
cover its expenses, ever since Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign failed
to propel her into an office from which she could dispense political favors.
Clinton Foundation reports to the IRS for the last two tax years have
demonstrated that without anyone to grant boons, fewer donors are interested in
supporting it.
The Clinton
Foundation reported a loss of more than $16 million in 2018, according to newly
released tax records, marking
the second consecutive year of losses since Hillary Clinton's humiliating
defeat to President Donald J. Trump in 2016.
The
foundation reported total revenue of just $30.7 million, including $24.2
million worth of grants and contributions, a record low for the alleged
"charity." That figure was well short of the foundation's total
expenses for the year—$47.5 million— resulting in a net loss of $16.8 million.
The
previous year, the Clinton Foundation reported a net loss of $16.1 million. In
total, the organization has lost a staggering $32.9 million since Hillary
Clinton's lifelong quest for the presidency crumbled to dust in November 2016.
The
contrast with previous years when political favors were a lure is striking:
The Clinton
Foundation posted its highest revenue haul ($249 million) in 2009, the year
Hillary was sworn in as President Barack Obama's secretary of state. By 2013,
the foundation had reported an additional $392.2 million in revenue, and went
on to raise $344.4 million between 2014 and 2016.
Between
2008 and 2016, the Clinton Foundation reported total revenue in excess of $1.1
billion, or an annual average of $130.4 million. Needless to say, Clinton's
stunning failure to defeat Donald Trump in the 2016 election appears to have
had a significant impact on the foundation's ability to raise money.
US Attorney
for Utah, John Huber, has been tasked with investigating the Clinton
Foundation. So far there has not been a single leak out of his office over its
work. That could mean either that they have turned up nothing, or that the
investigation and grand jury are proceeding with the secrecy that the law
demands.
VIDEO:
THE
FRAUDULENT CLINTON FOUNDATION EXPOSED.
PAY-TO-PLAY
FROM THE FIRST DAY!
Is it a
signal that she's back in the game because she's selling her president-ability
to the world's global billionaire crowd and laying the groundwork for more
funds? There are all kinds of ways for foreign billionaires to get
money to the U.S. without consequences, after all. What's more, it's
pretty much the biggest base of support she has, which is at least one reason
why she lost the 2016 election.
“The couple parlayed lives supposedly spent in “public
service” into admission into the upper stratosphere of American wealth,
with incomes in the top 0.1 percent bracket. The source of this vast wealth was
a political machine that might well be dubbed “Clinton, Inc.” This
consists essentially of a seedy money-laundering operation to ensure big
business support for the Clintons’ political ambitions as well as their
personal fortunes.
The basic
components of the operation are lavishly paid speeches to Wall Street
and Fortune 500 audiences, corporate campaign contributions, and donations
to the ostensibly philanthropic Clinton Foundation.”
HILLARY
& BILLARY AND RED CHINA!
“Facilitating
strategic technology transfer in return for money is an old Clinton game.
The Chinese bought their way to access of considerable space technology
when Bill Clinton was president. Remember Charlie Trie, Loral, and the
rest of the crew?”
THE CLINTONS AND RED
CHINA:
A MONEY MAKING
TRAITORSHIP!
"Ask
Jeff Sessions about the charges. Money was flowing into the Clinton
Foundation from all over the world, disguised, rerouted through a Canadian
charity, all to obscure its origins."
AMERICAN
PREDATORS:
THE BRIBES
SUCKING LIVES OF HILLARY & BILLARY
The Clintons have been a criminal enterprise since they came to power in
Arkansas. The list of scandals they have generated is long and
tawdry. Their principal goal then and now has always been to enrich
themselves. They never once had a moral compunction about lying,
cheating, selling, and stealing their way to wealth. They are the Perons
of America. They eventually set up a "foundation" and the
money kept rolling in.
Only six percent of the billions of dollars the
"Foundation" takes in goes to charity. The rest subsidizes
the lavish lifestyles of the Clintons and their sycophants; those people who
have sold their souls to rub shoulders with unadulterated power.
THE SHADY POLITICS OF HILLARY CLINTON and her PAY-TO-PLAY MAFIA
The left
cared nothing about that bit of collusion.
Hillary and
her campaign aides have long been involved with Russia for reasons of personal
gain. Clinton herself got $145 million in
donations to the Clinton Foundation for allowing Russia to take over twenty
percent of all uranium production in
the U.S. Her campaign chairman, John Podesta, is reaping the financial
benefits of being on the board of a Russian company, Joule, which he did not disclose. PATRICIA
McCARTHY
Had Hillary
been elected, the Clinton Foundation would be raking in even more millions than
it did before. She would be happily selling access, favors and our
remaining freedoms out from under us. PATRICIA McCARTHY
THE PHONY
CLINTON FOUNDATION CHARITY slush fund
“There
is no controlling Bill Clinton. He
does whatever he wants and runs up incredible expenses with foundation funds,”
states a separate interview memo attached to the submission.
“Bill
Clinton mixes and matches his personal
business
with that of the foundation. Many
people
within the foundation have tried to
caution
him about this but he does not listen,
and
there really is no talking to him,” the
memo
added.
The list
of predicate crimes is extensive and includes bribery,
embezzlement, fraud, theft, money laundering, and obstruction of justice.
Secretary Hillary Clinton and the Deep State: A RICO Criminal
Conspiracy
We
who elected President Trump understood our elected officials and the Deep State were
sandbagging Trump and self-dealing public funds. It was no secret that
President Trump is no angel, unpresidential, blunt, and crude, and a disruptor.
Trump was hired to drain the swamp.
I
watched this kabuki theater unfold
over the last several years. Through my eyes as a shopworn gumshoe, I will
explain what is happening. My investigative curiosity was first piqued by the
ATF Fast and Furious scandal and continues through the recent House impeachment
show trial. There is a common element running through all of these cons —
the actions of an organized crime conspiracy. A group of people
either acting alone or in concert with others committed crimes with a common
purpose - a criminal enterprise as
described in "CRIMINAL RICO: 18 USC.
§§1961-1968 A Manual For Federal Prosecutors."
The
players acted together – in the usurpation of power, the abuse of power by
public officials, bribery, thefts by fraud including federal funds, money
laundering, perjury and the obstruction of justice, the violations of
fundamental of civil rights, aided and abetted in the commission of these
crimes and or to conceal these crimes. Criminals will lie and can't keep their
lies straight. Their methods and behaviors are the same, whether engaging in
street crimes or elaborate white-collar financial schemes. The only difference
is when more money is involved, the perps are more adept in concealing,
covering up their sins, and hiding where the money went. Many of these scandals
are well known to the American Thinker readers. I will
focus my comments on Hillary's home brew sever and the Clinton Foundation as an
example of how RICO can be used to prosecute the players.
FBI
Director James Comey indicted Hillary Clinton for her home brew server at his
press conference. Comey then egregiously concluded that there was no evidence
of criminal intent purportedly “required” to prosecute. Comey bastardized
the Federal Espionage Act in
absolving Hillary Clinton. FBI's investigation of Clinton's emails was
low-balled. There was never a real search for the truth. The outcome was preordained.
My jaw dropped wide open. I knew the fix was in. FBI Director Comey lied to the
people with a straight face. Why?
The
chance meeting of Bill Clinton and AG Loretta Lynch on the airport tarmac was
no mere coincidence. This chat was not about the grandkids. Bill Clinton was
there to convey a specific message to Lynch that there would be no indictment
of Hillary. Hillary Clinton's email case must tank. This
would have constituted bribery, if AG Lynch was assured she would continue as
AG in Clinton Administration. This meeting took place only weeks before
Comey's press conference dumping Hillary Clinton's email case.
The
Deep State needed Hillary Clinton to win the 2016 presidential election, or the
dike holding back the truth would burst. Trump, the disruptor, was an immediate
threat to both the Republicans, Democrats, and the Deep State. If
the truth were laid bare, it would expose the Obama Administration, Hillary
Clinton, the Senate and House, and many executive departments for these abuses
of power, corruption, bribery, frauds, and thefts of public funds.
High-level
government officials and the Deep State committed many serious felonies either
in furtherance of or to conceal the crimes committed in the pay to play scam.
In exchange for favorable consideration by Secretary Clinton, those who
benefited would donate to the Clinton Foundation. The FBI started and stopped
investigations into the Clinton Foundation at least twice as reported by
the Washington Post.
Peter Schweizer's book, Clinton Cash, is
the most damning. Dinesh D'Souza slammed the Foundation in the National Review, as
did The Federalist.
The
status of the investigation of
the Foundation by US Attorney John Huber's is unknown. Rudy Giuliani said there
was enough to pursue "Clinton Inc"
as racketeering under RICO. The Foundation and its affiliated
nonprofits require a real investigation with an in-depth forensic audit to
determine where the money went. In financial crimes investigation, the prime
rule is "follow the money, honey." Illicit nonprofits have many ways
to divert funds by inflating salaries, expenses, and money laundering.
Illegal
nonprofit schemes are difficult to prosecute without hard evidence and the testimony
of insiders. The motive of Hillary Clinton's use of the home brew server was to
conceal emails from FOIA requests that would provide the hard evidence. Hillary
Clinton destroyed the data on her server and cell phones with the knowledge of
the FBI. It took years for Judicial Watch and
others to pry and recover some of these damning emails from the foot-dragging
executive departments that were complicit and knew what was going on.
RICO
initially was used to target mob families. RICO is also a useful tool to fight
white collar conspiracies. They both have the same hierarchy of low-level
crooks led by the top players, linked together with a common purpose. RICO has
tools to squeeze the low-level operatives to gather evidence to prosecute,
jail, and seize assets of the conspirators. The critical element required is
a pattern of criminal or racketeering activity.
This pattern is proved by showing two predicate crimes were committed within
ten years. The list of predicate
crimes is extensive and includes bribery, embezzlement, fraud,
theft, money laundering, and obstruction of justice. The typical five-year
statute of limitations for most federal felonies is extended to ten years from
the last criminal act or acts committed to conceal the conspiracy, i.e., lying
under oath and similar actions to obstruct justice. The prison sentences are
steep. The effect is to cut off the head of the organization and not just the
low-level players.
The
criminal activity extends back to the ATF's Fast and Furious program through
the House impeachment show trial to cover up the illegal acts of the Obama
Administration, Hillary Clinton, the Department of State, the DOJ, the FBI, and
the CIA. A telltale sign that the DOJ under US Attorney General Barr is
willing to play hardball and may use RICO, came when he spoke to the Federalist
Society: "Barr accuses liberal
'resistance' of trying to 'sabotage' Trump." AG Barr said
this, "shows FBI launched
Trump campaign investigation on the 'thinnest of suspicions."
AG Barr is the new sheriff in town, he wears a badge, has guns and will travel,
can impanel grand juries, indict and arrest people, and is not limited in his
jurisdiction, like DOJ IG Horowitz.
The
collective actions of the Deep State are and were a silent coup to delegitimize
a Presidential candidate. Once elected to impede and resist the duly elected
President. The President's law enforcement and intel agencies were corrupted at
the highest level and went rogue.
Organized
crime can't exist without corrupt law enforcement. As I wrote in a letter to
President Trump earlier this year:
. .
. I believe you understand the gravity of the situation and of its importance
to the very survival of our Country as we know it. If the people involved are
not held accountable for their actions, we will be no different than some Third
World Banana Republic.
Failure
to act will destroy our founding principle of the Rule of Law as stated by
President John Adams, "We Are a Nation of Laws, Not of Men" and we
cannot allow a two-tiered justice system to prevail.
Ron Wright is a retired
detective from Riverside PD, CA. BA in political science CSUF, M. Adm.
University of Cal, Riverside. Facebook at Ron T. Cop.
No comments:
Post a Comment