Crump knows that the U.N. cannot affect policing in America. This is theater, but it's disgusting theater to see a race-hustler appeal to an anti-American organization that has no trouble with totalitarian organizations around the world abusing people under their control, and that turned a blind eye for decades to its own organization's abuse of blacks. Thinking about Crump's conduct, perhaps it's time to drag out the Logan Act...
Why No 'White Lives
Matter'?
Tessa Majors, a young
woman ''not of color," was unable to complete her first semester at
Barnard University in New York City. She was fatally stabbed in Morningside
Park adjacent to the university, collapsing as she left the park -- a place
referred to over the years as "Muggingside Park.” At least one "person
of color," all of thirteen years old, has been arrested. Although it is unclear
whether he participated in the murder, he has implicated others who, like him,
have barely reached their teen years.
Three days earlier, a
black man and a black woman, members of a virulently anti-Semitic sect, the
black Hebrew Israelites, went on a killing spree in a kosher market in Jersey
City. Six people died, including a police officer.
Last week’s incidents
have one obvious thing in common -- both involved blacks murdering
whites. They also have at least one other thing in common -- nobody
marched, nobody protested, nobody circulated ‘White Lives Matter” shirts,
nobody organized boycotts of black-run businesses, nobody took to the streets
screaming racial epithets, nobody threw bricks at black-owned property, and
nobody attacked black citizens.
Contrast that
non-reaction not only to what occurred in Baltimore four years ago when Freddie
Gray died, or five years ago in Ferguson when Michael Brown died, but with what
happened for three days in 1991 when a seven-year-old black boy was tragically
but unintentionally killed by a vehicle driven by Yosef Lifsh, an Orthodox Jew
who was escorting the Grand Rebbe of the Lubavitch Hasidic community to the
cemetery where he visited his deceased wife every Sunday. Lifsh’s car collided
with another vehicle; the collision sent Lifsh's car flying onto the sidewalk
where it pinned a black youth, Gavin Cato, against a building, causing his
death.
Approximately
600 blacks in Crown Heights rioted for three days, injuring just under two
hundred people; two residents were shot, a sniper wounded eight police
officers, a firehouse was attacked and buildings burned. All of that pales by
comparison to the fate of Yankel Rosenbaum, a Hasidic scholar from Australia.
He was surrounded by a large group of black youths and repeatedly stabbed by
Lemrick Nelson, until he collapsed and died.
Why are the reactions to
those tragedies so different? Why no rioting and no reprisals when whites are
intentionally and brutally murdered by blacks but prolonged rioting and reprisals
reflexively occur when a black is tragically but unintentionally killed,
another black is shot to death as he was attacking a white police officer and a
third black died from injuries sustained in a police van after being arrested
for possession of an illegal weapon? (It is important to remember that none of
the police officers were convicted of anything and the Justice Department
decided against filing federal civil rights charges against any of the officers
involved in the Freddie Gray incident and the police officer who shot and
killed Michael Brown was never charged).
If pressed to answer what
they perceive as a racist inquiry, liberals will point to the sordid history of
slavery in this country. Doesn’t that beg the question? By 1991, no black who
lived through slavery was still alive. In fact, it is unlikely that even a
child of a slave was still alive then. Moreover, the Crown Heights riot
occurred in a place where slavery was outlawed in 1827 and which was a center
of abolitionist activism thereafter. While Jews did comprise roughly one
percent of Southern slaveowners, the Jewish commitment to the Civil Rights
movement one hundred years later -- which actually happened during the
lifetimes of many involved in the Crown Heights rioting -- is far more telling
evidence of their present-day racial mindset. If we want to talk prejudice and
discrimination, no group has had more personal experience to draw upon than the
Jews. While slavery was horrific, it still wasn’t genocide. So why the rioting,
why no real consequences for the rioting, and why no Jewish rioting in Jersey
City or Columbia University?
There is no better
example of the Jewish reaction to their horrendous mistreatment than the recent
Hungarian film 1945. After surviving years in a concentration
camp, an elderly Orthodox Jew and his son return to their Hungarian village.
Local officials had alerted the Germans to their presence in the village during
the war in order to steal the Jews’ property once they were deported to the
camps. Returning to the village, the father and son, throughout almost the
entirety of the film, walk slowly but deliberately back toward their home
carrying a very large crate. Their quiet (they never speak) dignity is in sharp
contrast to the bedlam their arrival engenders. Everyone fears they have
returned to claim the property officials stole from them years earlier. In
fact, the guilt, greed and stupidity of the townsfolk results in their burning
down their own village, not before, however, they realize that the "large
crate” contains playthings and remnants, all that was left of the lives
of their family who perished in the camp. They return home not to fight for
their property but to bury those remnants of lost lives in the family
cemetery.
This is how Jews for the
most part react to the tragic and inhumane treatment to which they are too
often subjected. It is this grace and grandeur depicted in 1945 that
enrages other minorities more than anything else. Jews are not loathed just for
failing to “man up.” Rather, it is their failure to react that way, whether in
response to the Jersey City murders or the Crown Heights riots, which both
demonstrates and symbolizes a moral pinnacle which others despise. They despise
it because it brings into sharp contrast their own animalistic response. Simply
put, it is the old story of Jacob and Esau with one twist -- if anyone stole
the symbolic birthright of the blacks, it certainly wasn’t the Jews.
Walter Williams tackles the elephant
in the room on crime
Dr. Williams is a well known conservative economist and longtime
John Olin Chair faculty at George Mason University in eastern Virginia, author
of 12 books and syndicated columnist. In the past, he has been
substitute host on the Rush Limbaugh radio program. He is almost
like family to me, and I have benefited from his essays and books over the
years. This past week, I saw and read his essay on disparities in crime rates among races that was picked up
by Military in its October 2019 issue. What got Dr. Williams going
was the article by Matthew DeLisi of Iowa State U and John Paul
Wright of the U of Cincinnati titled "What Criminologists Don't Say and
Why."
Dr. Williams confirms that the writers are right about the liberal
tilt of criminologists — "If criminologists have the guts to even talk
about a race-crime connection, it's behind closed doors and in guarded
language. Any discussion about race and crime ... can mean the end
of one's professional career."
Dr. Williams points out teen black-on-white predatory behavior —
chronicled in detail by many, particularly Colin Flaherty, whose investigative reports appear frequently (more than 100) at American Thinker — cannot be reported,
mentioned, or considered by the media, politicians, criminologists,
commentators, politicians, even law enforcement people without risking being
called racist, the easy epithet used to enforce a ban on talking about the
realities of racial disparities in crime and the increasingly violent nature of
black violence against whites — the knockout game, polar bear hunting, flash
mob violence against people and property.
Referencing the Wright and DeLisi report, Dr. Williams comments on
another reality: that the rate of black homicide and armed robbery as well as
other violent crimes are as is as much as 15–30 times more than whites, for example, and he points out the silliness of criminologists'
claims that mass incarceration rather than criminality has decimated the black
community. He favorably quotes Wright and DeLisi when they say,
"What they [criminals] did, in reality was to prey on their neighbors."
Dr. Williams returns to a theme he has explored many times before
in this essay and commentary when he points out that the black family of the
past was two parents and stable, even back to days of slavery, and that the
black community was moral and law-abiding. "The strong
character of black people is responsible for the great progress made from
emancipation to today. ... [T]oday's conduct among black youth wouldn't have
been tolerated yesteryear."
My regret is there aren't enough Walter Williams and Thomas Sowell
types to engage the nutty attitudes of liberal chatterbox experts.
John Dale Dunn, M.D., J.D.
is an emergency physician, sheriff's medical officer and inactive attorney,
policy and science adviser to the American Council on Science and Health of NYC
and the Heartland Institute of Chicago.
Operation Mockingbird's Racial Destructive Lies
In
a recent article, I explained that Operation Mockingbird is a program
founded by the CIA in the 1950s to use journalists and front groups to spread
propaganda.
Today’s
version of Operation Mockingbird uses intelligence agencies, academia,
Hollywood, and the Democratic party to spread hatred for Christians,
traditional values, law-abiding gun owners, straight white men, pro-lifers,
police and the 63 million who voted for Trump.
I
am encouraged that a growing number of young Americans realize they are being
propagandized 24/7. Young people are fed up with SJWs (social justice warriors)
demonizing whites, anyone who is happy, successful, thin, and enjoying life.
Youths are angry for being branded an “ist” or “phobe” for everything they say
or do.
These
three Operation Mockingbird lies continue to wreak havoc, igniting racial
hatred, division and violence.
The Tea Party is racist.
In
2008, I was about to sing my “American Tea Party Anthem” at a rally in Orlando,
Florida. The audience of 6000 was 95% white. At center stage, I spontaneously
proclaimed, “Hello my fellow patriots. I am NOT an African American. I am
Lloyd Marcus, AMERICAN!” Surprisingly, the audience leaped
to their feet, erupting in thunderous cheers and applause. After the rally, I
was rushed by people, some with tears, thanking me. They believe hyphenating
divides us. I love John Wayne's hyphen speech. That
day in Orlando, I became “The Unhyphenated American.”
My
unhyphenated American proclamation received the same joyous response at over
500 Tea Party rallies nationwide. A Holocaust survivor gave me a tearful bear
hug.
At
a rally in Texas, a white cowboy approached me pushing a stroller with two
black babies he and his wife adopted from Africa. He and his wife asked God for
babies who needed their love. The proud pop was excited about his kids becoming
U.S. citizens.
At
a rally in Traverse City Michigan, a white woman in a wheelchair yelled, “Oh my
gosh, there's Lloyd Marcus! Can I get a picture with you?” The woman's adult
daughter told a staffer that her mom was dying and meeting me was atop her
mom's bucket list. Wow!
At
a rally in Montana, a rancher with working man's hands invited my wife and I to
visit his huge ranch. “We can shoot guns, drink whiskey on my porch and watch
the beautiful big sky sunset.”
Do
these Tea Party people behave like racist white supremacists? No. As a matter
of fact, 40% of the Tea Party voted for Obama,. They simply opposed him driving
us down the road to socialism.
Cops Murder Blacks
Democratic
presidential candidates Elizabeth Warren and Kamala Harris said Michael Brown
was “murdered” by a racist white cop. That irresponsible statement should
disqualify these two power-obsessed despicable people from becoming president.
Brown was not murdered. Evidence confirmed that Brown was shot while attacking
the officer inside his cruiser, trying to take the officer's
gun. Operation Mockingbird continues to promote the
Brown-was-murdered lie, resulting in cops being assaulted, ambushed, and
assassinated.
Whites Routinely Murder Blacks
To
sell their irresponsible evil lie that whites routinely murder blacks, fake
news media reported that Trayvon Martin was gunned down by George Zimmerman, a
“white Hispanic.” The truth is, Martin jumped on top of Zimmerman and began
beating his head into the ground. Incredibly, NBC news went as far as to edit
Zimmerman's 9/11 call to make him sound like a racist.
George
Zimmerman was acquitted in the 2012 shooting. And yet, the Martin shooting
continues to be used to sell the lie that innocent black children live in
constant danger of being murdered by racist white men. Zimmerman is
fighting back with a $100 million lawsuit against Martin's family
and the prosecutors.
Patriot brother JJ Flash is with the Trump Train and The True
Channel. He has done an outstanding job exposing how Operation Mockingbird is
behind corruption in our government.
Americans
have about had it with elitists who are behind the scenes propagandizing
us while demanding control of our lives and behavior. President Trump is
our new sheriff in town in Washington D.C. Thanks to him, We the People are
fighting and winning back our culture and freedoms.
Lloyd Marcus, The Unhyphenated American
She never said it was the police, by the way (she
casually refused, in an article about police killings, to place the blame anywhere), and we know it wasn't, because the police killed about 19 unarmed black males in 2017, and black people killed about 2,627 — a difference of over a hundred times. In fact, in 2018, black people killed about 2,600 black people, and whites in general — all of us, despite being 60% of the populace — killed only 234, more than ten times fewer. The greatest danger to black people in America today is always other black people. Black lives matter to Black Lives Matter only when it gives them an excuse to attack white people.
What Do They Really Want?
Imani Bashir, writing for the New York Times, says, "Living abroad is my way of prolonging my black son's life." It's actually the title of the article. She says she's been living abroad for years now, in places like Cairo and Poland and Malaysia and Wuhan (yes, that Wuhan), and that the bills are piling up and they're eating at her soul. Still, she won't move back to America. She sees her son's face in every black person the police kill. She's stuck in Florida for the moment, waiting for the borders to ease up so she can go anywhere else.
Her husband, from Buffalo, New York, is traveling with her, coaching American football where he can. She says before he turned 25, 30 of his friends had been killed. They never talked about white picket fences when they got married. They said if they were going to make it, if their son was going to make it, they had to go anywhere but here.
But notice they didn't go anywhere. They went to Poland, noted for its strict (and some say "bigoted") stances on immigration and gay rights; Cairo, a place that just blew up a few years ago, is looking to blow up again, and is known for its horrible treatment of women; and China, a communist country known for locking up Christians and Muslims and honest reporters, for not having habeas corpus, for selling the organs of political prisoners, and for grinding its workers into the dust. It's a firm supporter of the most oppressive, volatile states in Asia, the Middle East, and Africa. It has a domestic surveillance system seen only in our most harrowing classics of science fiction. Nineteen eighty-four came almost to life, and Imani Bashir moved there instead of Schenectady.
I mention these things because of where she didn't go. For instance, if she can scratch out a living on the fly, why not anywhere in black Africa? Why not the sub-Saharan region, where, as Howard French reports in China's Second Continent, 10 of the 20 fastest growing economies exist? Why not somewhere where the cost of living is cheaper and where, since she says racism exists everywhere, there could be little to no racism against her son?
These questions deserve a solid answer — especially if it's anything other than "I don't want to live around black people." It should also be asked of all the other famous black people who don't want to live around black people. Beyond this, I think it's questionable that 30 of her husband's friends died at the hands of the police. She never said it was the police, by the way (she casually refused, in an article about police killings, to place the blame anywhere), and we know it wasn't, because the police killed about 19 unarmed black males in 2017, and black people killed about 2,627 — a difference of over a hundred times. In fact, in 2018, black people killed about 2,600 black people, and whites in general — all of us, despite being 60% of the populace — killed only 234, more than ten times fewer. The greatest danger to black people in America today is always other black people. Black lives matter to Black Lives Matter only when it gives them an excuse to attack white people.
My theory is that she doesn't go to black Africa because she doesn't feel safe around black people, and she doesn't want to be confused for them. He doesn't, either. It's what they call a hidden bias. People with the sort of mindset I suspect here know that a fraction of their 13% of Americans is responsible for 50% of the crime, and they're profiling. The fact is, they can't say it. Once they admit it, the whole anti-racism scam is up. It means white parents, whose children, according to the FBI, are killed twice as often by black people than the other way around, have more of an excuse to move their kids to Poland. It means they have a reason to stop busing black kids to white schools, and going soft on crime, and beating their chests, and being hard on police. But Bashir says she's scared of us — and because she's afraid, people are rioting. I remind you that racism means being afraid of people for things they don't do.
The question is, what does she want? The New York Times reports that Minneapolis, like all the other places on fire, is one of the most liberal cities in the nation. Surpassing even Seattle, Minneapolis has black people on the City Council. Two of these black council members are transgender. None of them is a Republican. Juneteenth gets a yearly parade, and the police chief, until this week, was a black man. They're so devoted to fighting racism that you can't zone for single-family housing anymore — ostensibly to make the housing cheaper for blacks and to keep richer whites from having better neighborhoods to move to.
This means that Minneapolis and all the other left-wing cities on fire already do everything they can to police the police — and if they go any farther, they'll have to get rid of them altogether. The main job of the police officer, after all, is not to stop crimes in progress (since there are too few of them to see everything), but to show up after the fact and then sniff out a suspect. This means everyone who fits a criminal's description in the area will be tracked down, picked up, tied up, and locked up — and if he refuses, probably beaten up. If he refuses too manfully, possibly killed. In a country of 330 million people, there are going to be a few dozen murders by cop. But you get rid of this right to track, and you've gotten rid of the police. You get rid of profiling, and you get rid of the concept of policing. You get rid of the police, and you get rid of society. And Minneapolis, where the violent crime rate was already horrible — this year, before the riots, twice the national average, and last year three — is already too dangerous. Thanks to Black Lives Matter blowing up the police stations, it is about to get worse.
I ask you again — what does Imani Bashir want? What they all want and can't say: to live somewhere her son can't theoretically be mistaken for or hurt by a black criminal. It's a legitimate want. We want it for all good black people, too. But Black Lives Matter isn't finding ways to stop the criminals. It's instead finding ways, mostly, to punish the innocent. Bashir profiles and runs and barricades herself, and she's a victim of racism. I just wish that she, and the Black Lives Matter movement, and The New York Times, would respect us when we do it, too. They won't.
No comments:
Post a Comment