JOE BIDEN HAS NEVER DONE ANYTHING FOR AMERICA BUT HE SURE GOT RICH DOING IT!
As a senator, Biden
vigorously voted for several similar bills. In short, based on his voting
record, Joe Biden is not (and never was) a champion of disadvantaged Americans,
unless you consider multi-billion-dollar credit card corporations and
millionaires “disadvantaged.”
This year, it’s Mr. Biden. Financial
industry cash flowing to Mr. Biden and outside groups supporting him shows him
dramatically out-raising the president, with $44 million compared with Mr.
Trump’s $9 million.
Biden and Harris, said Obama at the DNC, would "rescue the
economy, like Joe helped me do after the Great
Recession." Rescue? Was this a laugh
line? As Louis Woodhill noted in
a May 2012 Forbes article, "[u]nder Obama, the worst recession since the
1930s has been followed by the slowest economic recovery in the history of the
republic. In a very real sense, there has been no recovery at all —
things are still getting worse."
Dissecting Obama's Delusional DNC Speech
By Jack
Cashill
Barack
Obama's speech at the DNC's misbegotten cyber-convention worked only for those
Americans, including most in the media, who paid no serious attention to the
eight years of Obama's presidency. As I document in my book Unmasking
Obama, I and scores of other journalists, many of them
unsalaried, did pay attention. What follows are some of the riffs
that I, and likely they, found most entertaining.
Obama
began by telling us the Constitution "wasn't a perfect document,"
implying that he would have done better had he been there. Its
redeeming quality was that it established "a system of representative
government — a democracy — through which we could better realize our highest
ideals."
As
late as March 2011, Obama seemed to believe this, saying, "With respect to
the notion that I can just suspend deportations through executive order, that's
just not the case, because there are laws on the books that Congress has
passed."
In
2012, with re-election looming, Obama unilaterally decided he could suspend
deportations through executive orders. He gave out a million or so
work authorizations while he was at it, arguing that he personally could make
laws that were "more fair, more efficient, and more just" than
Congress. Curiously, that is almost exactly what Stalin told the
Politburo when he forcibly collectivized Ukrainian farms.
Said
Obama at the DNC: "Donald Trump hasn't grown into the job because he
can't. And the consequences of that failure are
severe. One hundred seventy thousand Americans
dead. Millions of jobs gone while those at the top take in more than
ever."
To
blame Trump for the COVID dead is disgraceful, pure
demagoguery. Trump resisted the urge to nationalize the response and
allowed each state to respond to local conditions. As a result,
perhaps a third of American deaths occurred in just three of our bluest states
— New York, New Jersey, and Massachusetts. A much higher percentage
of people died of COVID in the U.K. Was Trump responsible for
those? As to "those at the top" who profited — people like
Mark Zuckerberg and Jeff Bezos — they are almost all Obama-supporters.
"For
eight years," said Obama, "Joe [Biden] was the last one in the room
whenever I faced a big decision." Biden was certainly in the
room on January 5, 2017. So were Comey, Brennan, Rice, Clapper, and
Sally Yates. The "big decision" here was how best to tie Trump
to Russia and subvert his presidency, "by the book," of course.
In
speaking of the Biden-Harris ticket, Obama told the DNC, "They'll expand
health care to more Americans, like Joe and I did ten years ago when he helped
craft the Affordable Care Act and nail down the votes to make it the law."
The
DNC might have invited Obamacare architect Jonathan Gruber to explain how those
votes were really nailed down. Said Gruber when he thought no one
was looking, "This bill was written in a tortured way to make sure CBO did
not score the mandate as taxes. If CBO scored the mandate as taxes,
the bill dies."
"Lack
of transparency is a huge political advantage," Gruber
continued. "And basically, call it the stupidity of the
American voter or whatever, but basically that was really, really critical for
the thing to pass."
Biden
and Harris, said Obama at the DNC, would "rescue the economy, like Joe
helped me do after the Great Recession." Rescue? Was
this a laugh line? As Louis Woodhill noted in
a May 2012 Forbes article, "[u]nder Obama, the worst recession since the
1930s has been followed by the slowest economic recovery in the history of the
republic. In a very real sense, there has been no recovery at all —
things are still getting worse."
Here
was one of my favorite Obama lines: "Joe knows the world, and the world
knows him." No one denies that, especially not the Russian and
Ukrainian oligarchs. In February 2009, Biden was the first to say,
"It is time to press the reset button and to revisit the many areas where
we can and should be working together with Russia."
During
a 2011 speech, Biden boasted of visiting a high-tech hub on the outskirts of
Moscow. With a proven talent for taking care of those close to him,
a talent he would hone in China and the Ukraine, Biden encouraged American
venture capitalists to invest there. By the way, yes, this is the
same evil Russia that Trump allegedly colluded with.
According
to Obama, Biden and Harris "believe that no one — including the president
— is above the law, and that no public official — including the president —
should use their office to enrich themselves or their supporters."
At
the time Obama ran for U.S. Senate in 2004, he was still struggling to pay his
student debts. Today, the Obamas have a net worth north of $40
million, almost as much as the Clintons and slightly more than Hunter Biden.
Biden
and Harris, Obama insisted, understand that the military ought not to be used
"against peaceful protesters on our own soil." Obama
actually said "peaceful," and no one apparently laughed.
Biden
and Harris also understand that "political opponents aren't 'un-American'
just because they disagree with you." Catherine Engelbrecht had
to chuckle at that one. Engelbrecht faced twenty-three distinct
audits or inquiries for daring to organize a Tea Party in Texas. The
IRS stalled or rejected the applicants of hundreds, if not thousands, of
comparable groups as well.
In
public testimony, Engelbrecht asked Congress "to end this ugly chapter of
political intimidation. There was a time when people of goodwill
were encouraged to participate in the processes of government, not targeted
because of it." Obama and Biden would not have been re-elected
in 2012 without that "ugly chapter."
Obama
assured us, too, that Biden and Harris understand that "a free press isn't
the 'enemy,' but the way we hold officials accountable." Tell
that to Sharyl Attkisson. Then with CBS News, Attkisson endured an
unprecedented campaign of Deep-State cyber-harassment for her failure to be
"reasonable" in her Benghazi reporting.
Meanwhile,
James Rosen, then chief Washington correspondent for Fox News, went three years
unaware that the DOJ was surveilling his personal and professional
communications. So invasive was the DOJ's surveillance that it moved
even the Washington Post, if not to condemn the action, at least to report it.
After
several minutes of multicultural blather, Obama closed by accusing Trump of
exactly what his administration did in the closing months of the 2016 campaign:
"tear[ing] our democracy down if that's what it takes to win."
Mr.
Barr, let's get those indictments ready.
Image:
Gage Skidmore via Flickr.
Fact Check: Joe Biden Mismanaged the
2009 Stimulus
CLAIM: Joe
Biden led America’s economic recovery in 2009, when he oversaw the Obama
administration’s stimulus.
VERDICT:
FALSE. Biden’s management of the stimulus was a disaster, with a buggy website
and failures like Solyndra.
Democrats
keep citing Biden’s role in the 2009 stimulus as evidence that he would be best
to manage the recovery of the American recovery from the coronavirus.
Billionaire mega-donor and failed presidential candidate Mike Bloomberg made
that argument on the fourth night of the Democratic National Convention (DNC)
on Thursday.
But the
facts say otherwise.
President
Barack Obama campaigned on providing a $50 billion stimulus
for the U.S. economy. By the time he took office, in the wake of the global
financial crisis, that figure ballooned and eventually hit $862 billion in
federal spending.
Obama gave
Biden the job of overseeing the stimulus. But things went wrong from the start.
The official
website monitoring the stimulus, Recovery.gov, was plagued by bugs, even
listing stimulus grants as having been sent to congressional districts that
simply did not exist.
Moreover,
much of the spending went to state and local governments to protect public
sector union jobs, not to generate economic growth in the private sector. Other
grants went to pet projects that had very little broader economic impact.
Senators
John McCain (R-AZ) and Tom Coburn (R-OK) released a report on the waste in the stimulus, as Politico noted:
There’s $4.7
million for Lockheed Martin to study supersonic corporate jet travel. More than
$210,000 for the National Institutes of Health to study the sex lives of
college students. And roughly $233,000 for California college students to
conduct exit polls in Africa about voting patterns.
…
McCain cited
$500,000 for Arizona State University to “study the genetic makeup of ants to
determine distinctive roles within the ant colony” and another $450,000 to
“study division of labor in ant colonies and develop a model for humans to
determine the optimal strategy for distributing a specialist in a variable work
environment.”
There were
other outrageous projects, like money to the Napa Wine
Train, and a golf course in San Francisco.
Notably,
both McCain and Coburn blamed Biden: “Asked who is to be blamed for such
projects in the stimulus bill, the two senators pointed to Vice President Joe
Biden, who once likened himself to a “sheriff” overseeing stimulus spending,” Politico reported.
But by far
the most memorable symbol of Biden’s mismanagement was Solyndra, a solar panel
manufacturer to which Biden gave over half a billion dollars in loan guarantees.
He even personally visited the plant in California, as did Obama.
“By
investing in the infrastructure and technology of the future, we are not only
creating jobs today, but laying the foundation for long-term growth in the 21st
century,” Biden promised at a groundbreaking for the company, in
terms similar to the promises he makes today about “green” energy.
And then,
just months later, Solyndra went bust.
Biden kept
predicting that things would eventually work. In 2010, he and Obama promised a “Recovery Summer.”
That summer
never came. Unemployment remained stubbornly high, and Republicans swept the
midterm elections in the House of Representatives.
Ultimately,
the stimulus failed — by its own standards. Obama’s economic team said that the
stimulus would prevent unemployment from rising above eight percent. It went
much higher than that, and for far longer than predicted.
The economy
eventually recovered — slowly — in spite of Biden and the stimulus, not because
of them.
Joel B.
Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News and the host of Breitbart News Sunday on Sirius XM
Patriot on Sunday evenings from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. ET (4 p.m. to 7 p.m. PT). His
new book, RED NOVEMBER,
tells the story of the 2020 Democratic presidential primary from a conservative
perspective. He is a winner of the 2018 Robert Novak Journalism Alumni
Fellowship. Follow him on Twitter at @joelpollak.
WE KNOW WHAT
OBAMA-HOLDER-BIDEN DID FOR THEIR CRONY BANKSTERS! THEIR CRIME TIDAL WAVE IS NOT
OVER AND NONE HAVE GONE TO PRISON!
As a senator, Biden vigorously voted for several similar
bills. In short, based on his voting record, Joe Biden is not (and never was) a
champion of disadvantaged Americans, unless you consider multi-billion-dollar credit
card corporations and millionaires “disadvantaged.”
This year, it’s Mr. Biden. Financial industry cash
flowing to Mr. Biden and outside groups supporting him shows him dramatically
out-raising the president, with $44 million compared with Mr. Trump’s $9
million.
"The reference to
what “Trump’s done” is a
fraud, since the both the
Democrats and
Republicans endorsed, on a
nearly unanimous
basis, the multi-trillion
dollar bailout of Wall
Street in March."
"Biden reassured Wall Street and the billionaires, “I’m not looking to
punish anyone.”
I’ve also fallen toward a
consultant theory of change — or like, a process theory of change. So a lot of
people on the left would say that the Hillary Clinton campaign largely ignored
economic issues, and doubled down on social issues, because of the neoliberal
ideology of the people who worked for her, and the fact that campaigning on
progressive economic policy would threaten the material interests of her
donors.
Democrats
nominate Biden in inane display of political reaction
21 August
2020
The
Democratic National Convention concluded Thursday night with the formal
acceptance of the party’s presidential nomination by former Vice President Joe
Biden, after a final two-hour session that was full of empty clichés, inane
rhetoric and nauseating insincerity.
The atmosphere Thursday
was more of a religious revival than a political event. There was incessant
emphasis on the personal moral superiority of Biden compared to Trump,
accompanied by increasingly maudlin testimonials to Biden’s alleged deep
concern for children, the downtrodden, and virtually anyone who crossed his
path. One former White House official referred to Biden’s “empathy skills,” a
phrase which recalls the old wisecrack: “Sincerity—if you can fake that, you’ve
got it made.”
The sheer contempt for the
intelligence of the
population and the viewing
audience was
summed up in Biden’s
acceptance speech. His
speechwriters appeared to
have been trying
to cram every
possible trite phrase into a
single 20-minute address.
He ran
through a laundry list of promises, from climate change to racism to student
debt, none of which the Democratic Party has the slightest intention of
actually carrying out. Only two phrases had real meaning.
Biden
reassured Wall Street and the billionaires, “I’m not looking to punish anyone.” This sent
a message to the financial aristocracy that, while the candidate was compelled
to make demagogic attacks on the wealthy for electoral purposes, these would
have no lasting consequences. “Nothing will change” for the
super-rich, he told a Wall Street fundraiser last year, and that pledge he will
keep.
And the
former vice president denounced Trump for being too soft on Russia, threatening
to hold Vladimir Putin accountable for allegedly paying bounties to Taliban
fighters who attacked American troops in Afghanistan. This phony story is just
the latest fabrication by the New York Times in its
four-year-long campaign to provoke a US war with Russia.
The tone
for the convention’s final day was set by the report Thursday afternoon that a
group of 73 former national security officials from four Republican
administrations were endorsing Biden and denouncing Trump in an open letter to
be published in the Wall Street Journal. The
list includes an array of militarists and police-state operatives who are
responsible for the death of millions of people in Latin America, Africa, the
Middle East and Central Asia.
Among the most prominent
and most deserving of prosecution for war crimes endorsing Biden are:
·
John Negroponte, with a bloody record from the contra terrorist
war against Nicaragua to the occupation of Iraq in the 2000s;
·
Colin Powell, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff during the
1991 Persian Gulf War, and secretary of state during the 2003 Iraq War, in
which he played a central role in justifying a war based on lies;
·
Michael Hayden, former director of the National Security Agency
and later CIA director, who oversaw CIA torture programs and domestic spying;
·
Robert Blackwill, deputy director of the National Security
Council with responsibility for Iraq war policy in 2003–2004;
·
Michael Leiter, director of the National Counterterrorism Center
under the younger Bush; and
·
William Webster, director of the FBI under Reagan and of the CIA
under the elder Bush.
The support of these
former leaders of the military-intelligence apparatus only underscores the real
character of the conflict between the Democratic and Republican parties, the
twin political instruments of the American ruling elite.
The Democrats oppose
Trump, not because of his tax cuts for billionaires or his attacks on
democratic rights and the rights of immigrants and refugees, but rather because
of differences over foreign policy related to the Middle East and particularly
Russia. An incoming Biden administration would immediately adopt an even more
provocative and aggressive anti-Russian policy.
This was underscored in
one segment after another of the final day’s program leading up to Biden’s
acceptance speech, with military veterans and Republicans brought forward to
speak in video segments. The most strident pro-war message came from Senator
Tammy Duckworth, who denounced Trump as the “coward in chief” for his alleged
capitulation to Putin over the bounties.
As for
domestic policy, Biden’s closest political associate, his Senate chief-of-staff
Ted Kaufman, who heads the transition team preparing for a future Biden
administration, told the Wall Street Journal Wednesday
that the rising federal budget deficit would make ambitious spending programs
impossible. “When we get in, the pantry is going to be bare,” Kaufman said.
“When you see what Trump’s done to the deficit… forget about COVID-19, all the
deficits that he built with the incredible tax cuts. So we’re going to be
limited.”
The reference to what
“Trump’s done” is a
fraud, since the both the
Democrats and
Republicans endorsed, on a
nearly unanimous
basis, the multi-trillion
dollar bailout of Wall
Street in March. The
coronavirus pandemic—which, as a
result of the policies of
the ruling class, has produced a social and
economic catastrophe for
the American population—has been
utilized by the ruling
elite as an opportunity to loot the public
treasury. And it is the
working class that will be forced to pay.
Despite claims by Bernie
Sanders that Biden could become the most progressive president since Franklin
Roosevelt, the real policy orientation of a future Biden administration was
signaled by the appearance of billionaire Michael Bloomberg, who gave the last
speech before Biden himself was introduced, pouring scorn on Trump as a poor
businessman and incompetent manager. It is the billionaires and the military-intelligence
apparatus, not political charlatans like Sanders, who will call the shots if
the Democrats win the White House.
Next week will put the
ultra-right ravings of the Republican Party and the Trump White House on
display. The Democratic Party masquerades as the friend of the workers while
doing the bidding of the corporate elite; the Republican Party, under Trump’s
direction, is working to develop a fascist movement. Both parties are the
enemies of the working class, which must develop and build an independent
revolutionary alternative.
BIDEN WAS SELECTED
BY BANKSTER-OWNED OBAMA BECAUSE OF HIS LONG HISTORY OF SERVING THE BANKSTERS!
Biden backed brutal
bankruptcy bill in 2005
By Chris
Talgo
In 1999, then-Sen. Joe Biden (D-DE) declared, “I’m not the senator from MBNA.”
Apparently, Biden felt it was necessary to clarify that he did not exclusively
represent credit card giant MBNA because his constituents were thoroughly
confused, based on his track record of being a shill for credit card companies
located in the First State.
Then, six years later, Biden inserted his foot directly
into his mouth (again) when he championed the notorious (and ill-named)
Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act (BAPCPA). A more
appropriate name could have been the Act to Protect Credit Card Companies and
Shaft Students and Workers.
In short, BAPCPA was a terrible bill that favored credit
card companies, big banks, and millionaires over working-class borrowers. It
also is solely responsible for the fact that student loan debt is totally
impossible to dismiss -- even after one has declared bankruptcy.
Wait a minute, I thought Joe Biden was the consummate
defender and advocate of the working class and oppressed. Far from it. In
reality,Biden’s political career of more than four decades was predicated
upon protecting the interests of credit card companies.
And he and his son, Hunter, were compensated handsomely for
doing so. According to a 2019 GQ article titled “How Biden Helped Strip
Bankruptcy Protection From Millions Just Before a Recession” -- “one of the
biggest credit card companies in Delaware, MBNA, hired Joe Biden's son Hunter
in 1996. Even after Hunter became a federal lobbyist in 2001, he stayed on at
MBNA as a consultant at a fee of $100,000 per year, meaning he was pulling in a
six-figure salary at the same time his father was pushing for the industry's
top priorities.” Can you say, quid pro quo, Joe?
According to Adam J. Levitin, professor of law at Georgetown University, BAPCPA “was perhaps
the most anti-middle class piece of legislation in the past century.” And, as
Levitin writes, “Biden used his clout to push for the law’s passage and to
defeat amendments to shield servicemembers, women, and children from its harsh
treatment. When votes were taken, ‘Middle-Class Joe’ was no friend to the
middle class.” It sure seems that Biden abandoned his Lunchbox Joe persona when
it came to voting in favor of BAPCPA, not to mention that he strongly supported
amendments that made the bill even more hostile to the middle class!
And adding insult to injury, Biden also voted against
several amendments that were specifically meant to help several
“underprivileged” groups. As Levitin writes, “He voted against three amendments to ease bankruptcy requirements for consumers whose financial
troubles stem from medical expenses. He voted against an amendment that would have helped seniors keep their homes. He voted against exempting servicemembers and widows of
servicemembers killed in action from the law’s eligibility restrictions. He voted against an amendment to exempt women whose financial troubles stemmed
from deadbeat husbands’ failure to pay child support or alimony. And Biden even voted against an amendment that would have ensured that children of debtors
could still be given birthday and Christmas presents. Biden also voted against allowing debtors to pay their union dues during
bankruptcy,
potentially imperiling their employment and ability to achieve financial
rehabilitation.” Could Biden’s voting record on this bill get any worse?
Actually, yes.
Not only did Biden strongly oppose BAPCPA amendments aimed
to help “disadvantaged” groups, he voted for two giant loopholes that
effectively allowed millionaires to shield their assets from collectors after
they filed for bankruptcy. What a joke, Joe.
As a senator, Biden vigorously voted for
several similar bills. In short, based on his voting record, Joe Biden is not
(and never was) a champion of disadvantaged Americans, unless you consider
multi-billion-dollar credit card corporations and millionaires “disadvantaged.”
Chris Talgo (ctalgo@heartland.org) is an editor at The
Heartland Institute.
Obama’s State
of Delusion ... OR JUST ANOTHER "Hope & Change" HOAX?
”The delusional character of Obama’s State of the Union
address on Tuesday—presenting an America of rising living
standards and a booming economy, capped by his declaration
that the “shadow of crisis has passed”—is perhaps matched
only in its presentation by the media and supporters of the
Democratic Party.”
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2015/01/oxfam-richest-one-percent-set-to.html
“The general tone was set by the New York Times in its lead
editorial on Wednesday, which described the speech as a “simple, dramatic
message about economic fairness, about the fact that the well-off—the top
earners, the big banks, Silicon Valley—have done just great, while middle and
working classes remain dead in the water.”
OBAMANOMICS:
The report observes that while the wealth of the world’s 80
richest people doubled between 2009 and 2014, the wealth of the poorest half of
the world’s population (3.5 billion people) was lower in 2014 than it was in
2009.
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2015/01/oxfam-richest-one-percent-set-to.html
In 2010, it took 388 billionaires to match the wealth of
the bottom half of the earth’s population; by 2013, the figure had fallen to
just 92 billionaires. It fell to 80 in 2014.
THE OBAMA ASSAULT ON THE AMERICAN MIDDLE-CLASS
“The goal of the Obama administration, working with the
Republicans and local governments, is to roll back the living conditions of the
vast majority of the population to levels not seen since the 19th century,
prior to the advent of the eight-hour day, child labor laws, comprehensive
public education, pensions, health benefits, workplace health and safety
regulations, etc.”
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2015/01/oxfam-richest-one-percent-set-to.html
“In response to the ruthless assault of the financial
oligarchy, spearheaded by Obama, the working class must advance, no less
ruthlessly, its own policy.”
New Federal Reserve report
US median income has plunged, inequality has grown in Obama
“recovery”
The yearly income of a typical US
household dropped by a massive 12 percent, or $6,400, in the six years between
2007 and 2013. This is just one of the findings of the 2013 Federal Reserve
Survey of Consumer Finances released Thursday, which documents a sharp decline
in working class living standards and a further concentration of wealth in the
hands of the rich and the super-rich.
Why the rich favor the Democrats
There's little doubt that today's Democrat
Party is the party of the rich. Actually, that's an
understatement. Far more than billionaires are involved. A better expression of reality
would be to say a fundamental core of Democrat coalition is the managerial
class, also known as the elite. These are the people who run the
media, Hollywood and the entertainment industry, the big corporations, the
universities and schools, the investment banks, and Wall Street. They
populate the upper levels of government bureaucracies. These are the
East and West Coasters.
The alliance of the affluent with the
Democrat Party can be seen in the widely disproportionate share of hefty
political donations from the well-to-do going to Democrats and a bevy of
left-wing causes. It's also why forty-one out of the fifty wealthiest
congressional districts are represented by Democrats.
BLOG: DEMS LOVE SOCIALISM FOR ILLEGALS TO
KEEP THEM COMING AND BREEDING ANCHOR BABIES FOR WELFARE AND SOCIALISM FOR
BANKS. TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS OF IT!
Bernie Sanders is an
exception. But he's an anomaly viewed as dangerous to the party,
which is why he's being crushed by the Democrat establishment.
Why do the wealthy align with the
Democrats? The answer may seem counter-intuitive, but it is really
quite simple. It's surely not ideals or high-minded
principles. Nor is it ignorance. Rather, it boils down to
raw self-interest.
In his book, The
Age of Entitlement: America Since the Sixties, Christopher Caldwell
notes that rich Americans think themselves to be as vulnerable as
blacks. They are a relatively small minority of the
population. They fear being resented for their wealth and power and
of having much of that taken from them. Accordingly, the wealthy
seek to protect what is theirs by preventing strong majorities from forming by
using the divide and conquer principle.
As R.R. Reno writes when reviewing Caldwell's book: "Therefore, the richest
and most
powerful people in America have strong incentives
to support an anti-majoritarian political system." He goes
on: "Wealthy individuals shovel donations into elite institutions that
incubate identity politics, which further fragments the nation and prevents the
formation of majorities."
Some of the rotten fruit of the wealthy
taking this approach include multiculturalism, massive immigration of
diverse people, resistance to encouraging assimilation, racial strife,
trying to turn white males into pariahs, and the promotion of gender
confusion. Through
it all, society is bombarded with the Orwellian mantra that
"diversity is strength," as if repeating it often enough can make it
so. It is also why patriotism and a common American culture are so
disparaged today. Those from the upper strata of society project the
idea that if you're a flag-waving American, you must be some kind of retrograde
mouth-breathing yokel.
The wealthy as a groups are content to
dissolve the glue that holds the U.S. together. And it is all done
to enhance and preserve their power, wealth, and influence. This is
why they so hate Donald Trump. He strives to unite people and
the country, although you'd never know that that is what the president is
doing if you live in the media
bubble. Trump's MAGA agenda is an anathema to the
managerial class.
To quote Reno one final time:
The next decade will not be
easy. But it will not be about what preoccupied us in the sixties,
and which Caldwell describes so well. Rather than the perils of
discrimination we are increasingly concerned with the problem of disintegration
— or in Charles Murray's terms, the problem of "coming apart."
Trump and the GOP he is molding are the
vehicles to restore and strengthen national solidarity. Trump said at
the Daytona 500, "No matter who wins, what matters most is God, family,
and country." That is not the Democrat
agenda. As seen in Democrat politicians, their policies, and the
behavior of their major contributors, the aim is to further weaken the social
and national bonds in America. There is a lot at stake
here. If solidarity wins, the Republic can survive
and prosper. If the Democrats and their wealthy cohorts do,
then the middle class withers, the Republic dies, and the rich and their
managerial class get to rule the roost. That is what it comes down
to.
ALL BILLIONAIRES ARE DEMOCRATS. ALL BILLIONAIRES WANT
WIDER OPEN BORDERS, AMNESTY AND HELL NO TO E-VERIFY!
In addition, establishment Republicans are no better than
Democrats at stemming the flow of illegal immigration because big businesses reap the benefits of this cheap labor without incurring any of the social
costs.
This is why the SEIU supports blanket amnesty for illegal aliens.
No comments:
Post a Comment