STEVIE NICKS - THERE'D BE NO FLEETWOOD MAC IF I'D NOT HAD AN ABORTION - WHAT DID YOU NAME YOUR UNBORN CHILD? - “I Cut the Vocal Cord So The Baby Can't Scream.”

 ABORTION KI LLS…. the innocent!

PLANNED PARENTHOOD:

America’s baby murdering factories…. Your tax dollars at work

 

“I Cut the Vocal Cord So The Baby Can't Scream.”

 

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/03/baby-butcher-dr-leah-torres-in-salt.html 

 

Dr. Leah Torres, an OB/GYN in Salt Lake City, Utah, said that when she performs certain abortions she cuts the vocal cord of the baby so "there's really no opportunity" for the child to scream. She also described herself as a "uterus ripper outer" because she performs hysterectomies.

SOCIOPATH LAWLESS LAWYER KAMALA HARRIS.

BEING AN ‘OFFICER OF THE COURT’ CORRUPT PROSECUTOR AND ETHICALLY DEPRAVED LAWYER, KAMALA HARRIS HAS DEMONSTRATED A LONG RECORD OF TURNING LAWS UNDER THE CARPET WHEN THERE IS A BRIBE TO BE HAD!

https://kamala-harris-sociopath.blogspot.com/2020/09/ethically-depraved-lawyer-kamala-harris.html

It is the handmaidens working for Planned Parenthood who have joked about selling aborted baby body parts.  And it was Kamala Harris, when she was A.G. of California, who viciously prosecuted the young man who exposed that scandal, after she had received a hefty donation from Planned Parenthood. DIANA MARY SITEK

Kamala Harris, like Biden, supports Planned Parenthood’s crimes against the unborn and takes money and endorsements from the abortion industry. 

                                                DANIEL JOHN SOBIESKI

The best-case scenario is that she’s a progressive who repeatedly violated her own principles so that she could promote her career. In the worst-case scenario, she’s just another corrupt, rotten, regressive prosecutor.

                                                           JESSER HOROWITZ

Stevie Nicks: There’d Be No Fleetwood Mac ‘If I Had Not Had That Abortion’

Dimitrios Kambouris/Getty Images For The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame

ALANA MASTRANGELO

15 Oct 2020894

2:48

After telling Variety that she’s contemplating leaving the United States if President Donald Trump wins re-election, rocker Stevie Nicks says there wouldn’t have been a Fleetwood Mac if she had not had an abortion.

“If I had not had that abortion, I’m pretty sure there would have been no Fleetwood Mac,” said Nick in a recent interview with The Guardian. The singer ended her unborn child’s life in 1979 while she was dating Don Henley of The Eagles. “There’s just no way that I could have had a child then, working as hard as we worked constantly. And there were a lot of drugs, I was doing a lot of drugs — I would have had to walk away.”

Besides, Nicks felt that “the music we were going to bring to the world” was much more important than the life of her own flesh and blood.

“And I knew that the music we were going to bring to the world was going to heal so many people’s hearts and make people so happy,” she said. “And I thought: you know what? That’s really important. There’s not another band in the world that has two lead women singers, two lead women writers. That was my world’s mission.”

The rocker jumped into the presidential election last week, telling Variety in an interview to promote her new single “Show Them the Way” that she’s “thinking: Oh, space” if Trump wins. “Maybe I can talk Elon Musk into giving us a jet and letting me pick 50 people.”
Nicks is not the only celebrity elite to suggest that she wouldn’t have been able to figure out how to be successful in her career if she had started a family.

Earlier this year at the 77th Golden Globes, actress Michelle Williams suggested that abortion was the reason she was able to win a golden globe.

Watch Below:

“I’m grateful for the acknowledgement for the choices I’ve made and I’m also grateful to live in a moment in our society where choice exists because as women and as girls, things can happen to our bodies that are not our choice,” said Williams. “I’ve tried my very best to live a life of my own making and not just the series of events that happen to you but one that I can stand back and look at and recognize my handwriting all over, sometimes messy and scrawling, sometimes careful and precise, but one that I have carved with my own hand and I wouldn’t have been able to do this without employing a woman’s right to choose.”

On Wednesday, actress Patricia Arquette even took it upon herself to speak on behalf of suburban mothers across America, proclaiming that they want their daughters to have the right to abortion.

The majority of suburban women want their daughters to have the right to chose and to have access to a safe abortion if they need one.

— Patricia Arquette (@PattyArquette) October 14, 2020

“The majority of suburban women want their daughters to have the right to chose and to have access to a safe abortion if they need one,” wrote Arquette to her 470,000 Twitter followers.

You can follow Alana Mastrangelo on Facebook and Twitter at @ARmastrangelo, on Parler at @alana, and on Instagram.

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand: ‘Our Lives Depend On’ Protecting Abortion Rights

  

By Craig Bannister | May 24, 2019 | 12:57 PM EDT

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) (Getty/Steve Pope)

“Our lives depend on” protecting abortion rights, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) claimed Friday in response to breaking news that restrictions on the termination of unborn babies in Missouri had been signed into law.

Reacting to an Associated Press (AP) story that Missouri’s new law bans abortion at the eighth week of pregnancy, Sen. Gillibrand tweeted that women’s lives depend on forcefully fighting back:

“Women can't afford for us to take half-measures in response to an all-out onslaught on their rights. We have to fight back like our lives depend on it. They do.”

According to the AP story, Missouri’s abortion ban includes exceptions when the life or physical health of the mother is endangered by pregnancy:

Missouri Gov. Mike Parson on Friday signed a bill that bans abortions on or beyond the eighth week of pregnancy without exceptions for cases of rape or incest, making it among the most restrictive abortion policies in the nation.

…

The measure includes exceptions for medical emergencies, such as when there is a risk of death or permanent physical injuries to “a major bodily function of the pregnant woman.”

What Is It With Democrats And Death?

https://townhall.com/columnists/kevinmccullough/2019/05/26/what-is-it-with-democrats-and-death-n2546898

Kevin McCullough

|

They oppose legislation to prevent them from being killed. They pass legislation that seeks ways to ensure their death. They make outlandish and ridiculously stupid claims as justification to do so. And when presented with evidence to the contrary they flinch.

Recently I found myself in a conversation with perhaps the single most influential person not currently in elective office in New York City.

We were discussing the impact of the six or seven states that have adopted “heartbeat bills” and Alabama’s recently passed nearly 100% abortion ban.

This person’s observation specifically: “If Republicans don’t stop with the pro-life issue, they will push women to vote for... (dramatic pause inserted) ...Democrats.”

So Democrats are supported by those who want the right to see their children dead.

In New York it was the Democrat elected Assembly and governor who passed, signed into law, and then gave themselves a standing ovation on the dead-of-night passage of that state’s new legalization of killing children after they had been born.

In Virginia it was a Democrat governor who eerily described on morning radio step by step what happens when they decide whether a born child has the right to live or be killed.

On Friday, at a gathering of nearly 1300 New York City/Tri-State area pastors, those gathered learned that Democrats have opposed the expansion of crisis pregnancy centers, while actively pushing for the expansion of abortion facility licenses. This happening while three NYC Democrat-controlled zip codes are the only ones where abortions outnumber live births.

Democrats often claim that to be in favor of killing of children is to be “pro-woman.” Yet they refuse to acknowledge that their policies have ushered in the death of more than 30 million women in recent years.

Democrats claim that no child should be forced to live a life unwanted—that every child—they argue should know a life of love. Yet they fail to recognize that at any single point in time there are somewhere around 2 million couplesseeking adoption while last year Americans killed a touch more than 800 thousand innocent babies in 2018. 

Democrats have argued for mandatory tax-payer funding for low income women to have their children killed without having to pay for it. They have also turned around and resisted efforts by then President George W. Bush to incentivize and encourage marriage  which statistically speaking provides greater financial and emotional security for the woman and the child.

Democrats argue in favor of government administrated gun control laws—which leave children in high crime areas far more vulnerable. Democrats argue against common gun ownership by law abiding citizens which again would by law leave children at the mercy of criminals. Democrats almost unilaterally ignore the gunman’s choices in school shootings. They also never fail to condemn gun makers. The very gun makers that produced the tools used to stop most school shooters.

Democrats refuse to assist the children separated from real families (not the coyote rapists) in the current immigration crisis. Democrats also looked the other way when President Clinton signed the family separation law, and President Obama began to enforce it.

And this week Nancy Pelosi led the charge of Democrats and for the fiftieth consecutive time were able to kill legislation that prevented post birth killing of children already born. Akin to the dead of night New York State Assembly vote—Democrats on the national stage voted to keep the killing of born children—legal.

They claim it’s all about compassion.  They cite statistics that are in themselves so small that they—statistically speaking—almost never come into play. Or do they?

Bottom line Democrats argue in favor and 

tirelessly work for the death of children—

born and unborn.

I just don’t get why. 

It seems to me to be very cruel and completely lacking in the compassion they too often invoke.

Kevin McCullough's Latest Books including The Kind of Man Every Man Should Be: Taking a Stand for True Masculinity are available on Amazon 

Anti-abortion activists participate in the "March for Life," an annual event to mark the anniversary of the 1973 Supreme Court case Roe v. Wade, which legalized abortion in the US, outside the US Supreme Court in Washington, DC, January 18, 2019. (Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images)