Wednesday, March 24, 2021

MURDERING MUSLIMS - Muslim Soldiers Executing Their Christian Comrades

The gunman who allegedly opened fire in a Boulder, Colorado, grocery store on Monday has been identified as 21-year-old Ahmad Al Aliwi Alissa by the New York Times.


Boulder Shooter is ISIS Sympathizer, Leftists Hardest Hit

Another opportunity to shore up their sagging “white terror threat” narrative is lost.

 

A man murdered ten people in a Boulder, Colorado supermarket Monday. No details were immediately released about the shooter, but Leftist “journalists,” working from a photo of the shooter, seized upon the shooting to shore up their sagging narrative of “white supremacist terrorism.” There was just one problem: the massacre was actually, after a four-year hiatus, a new incidence of Islamic jihad on American soil.

Even after the shooter’s name was revealed as Ahmad Al Issa (which is how he himself wrote it on his Facebook and Twitter accounts), establishment media reports continued to give his name as  “Alissa,” which of course is a common first name for women in the U.S., and thus gives the impression that he is an American non-Muslim. Were “journalists” trying to obscure the fact that he is a Muslim migrant ISIS sympathizer? Of course they were.

And that was after they had already decided that he was one of those “right-wing extremists” who are, according to DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, the “most lethal and persistent” threat the U.S. faces today. Julie DiCaro, a senior writer and editor at Deadspin, tweeted: “Extremely tired of people’s lives depending on whether a white man with an AR-15 is having a good day or not.” As of this writing on Tuesday afternoon, DiCaro has not taken down the tweet, as some media hacks are still, like a captain going down with his sinking ship, insisting that Al Issa is white. Prominent race baiter Tariq Nasheed tweeted: “White supremacists are trying their hardest to deflect from the fact the Boulder suspect is WHITE. Syrians in America are legally, politically & socially WHITE. Their white status is well documented in court cases Terms like ‘muslim’, ‘Arab’, ‘islamic’ doesn’t change whiteness.”

Of course Al Issa really is white, as he is an Arab Muslim migrant from Syria, and Arabs have been considered “white” ever since they began arriving in this country. Nasheed’s tweet, however, still pointed up the Left’s inconsistency and hypocrisy: up until this shooting, Leftists considered Arab Muslims to be “brown,” after the fashion of Linda Sarsour, who memorably identified as white until she put on a hijab and miraculously became a “person of color.” If the Boulder shooter had been a white non-Muslim American and his victims had been white Arab Muslims, Tariq Nasheed would be railing against the persecution of “brown” people in the United States.

But as it is, Nasheed is trying desperately to shore up a failing narrative. The reality is that Ahmad Al Issa is a deeply religious Muslim with pro-ISIS sympathies. He complained bitterly about “Islamophobia,” hated Donald Trump with passionate intensity, and had scouted out churches and Trump rallies as possible targets for his jihad massacre.

All this makes it abundantly clear that not only is Ahmad Al Issa not a “white supremacist,” but he is a living manifestation of the effects of Leftism in America today. After migrating from Syria as a child during the Obama administration, he, and many others like him, has been inundated with relentless propaganda about how he is a victim of a racist and “Islamophobic” society that will never give him a fair shake, and is institutionally determined to make sure he will never succeed. He has been told that Trump hated Muslims and that his followers were precisely the people who were keeping him down and denying him access to the privilege that they themselves enjoyed at the expense of the “brown” people they despised.

The Democratic Party has been stoking this kind of resentment and feeding it to young people in schools, colleges and universities for years. Ahmad Al Issa is a product of their indoctrination. That in itself may be one reason why Leftist “journalists” and professional agitators such as Tariq Nasheed are so intent on driving home the point that this was a “white” shooter acting out of the hatred that is intrinsic to American culture: to deflect attention away from the fact that he is not a product of American culture at all, but of the Left’s subculture of hatred and resentment. If we had a sane political environment in the country today, that is the hateful subculture the Justice Department would be concerned about. Instead, even as Antifa continues to make the Great Northwest into a radioactive wasteland, this hateful subculture isn’t even on the radar screen. And Ahmad Al Issa isn’t going to put it there.

Robert Spencer is the director of Jihad Watch and a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. He is author of 21 books, including the New York Times bestsellers The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades) and The Truth About Muhammad. His latest book is Rating America’s Presidents: An America-First Look at Who Is Best, Who Is Overrated, and Who Was An Absolute Disaster. Follow him on Twitter here. Like him on Facebook here.


Palestinian Media Watch, an Israeli watchdog group, recently determined the Palestinian government spent around 3.2 percent of its total 2020 budget, or $155 million, on the "pay-to-slay" program. Many of these payments were obscured by the PA, which funneled some $300 million to the PLO so that it could continue payment to terrorists in violation of U.S. law.


Muslim Soldiers Executing Their Christian Comrades

Muslim soldiers are killing their Christian comrades in arms — apparently because the latter, as "infidels," are already the enemy.  Most recently, in Nigeria, a Muslim colonel stole weapons from an armory and then blamed the twelve soldiers on duty for the theft.  Six of those twelve soldiers — all Christians — were then executed.  According to a lawyer acquainted with the case:

The [Nigerian] government of today detests Christianity[.] ... This administration is running on ethnic agenda against the Igbo [Christian] population[.] ... This has never been a practice in the Army. Things got changed the moment this present administration [of Muhammadu Buhari] came to power. Things are happening before that didn't happen. It's not only about these six soldiers[.] ... Even in the security forces, Christians are being targeted.

The Feb. 4 report elaborates:

Many Nigerians now believe the Army fights for Islam, not Nigeria[.] ... In the country's predominately Christian south, people call it 'Boko Haram's Army.' Muslims hold all the most important leadership positions. The Army's lack of action to protect Christians comes directly from its leaders in government[.] ... When troops go into areas controlled by radical Islamists to defend Nigerian Christians, the government orders them to retreat. Then, Islamist rebels shoot them in the back.

The phenomenon of Muslim military men murdering their Christian counterparts — and getting away with it — is hardly limited to Nigeria.  In 2018, for instance, Matthew Samir Habib, a 22-year-old Christian in Egypt's military was killed simply for being Christian.  He was the latest of about ten Christian soldiers in Egypt to be killed in separate incidents over the years by Muslim soldiers on account of their faith.

In virtually all of these cases, a similar pattern follows: despite all the evidence otherwise (such as physical bruises all over the bodies of the slain), military officials insist that — due to some sudden and inexplicable bout of depression — all these Christians supposedly committed "suicide."  Meanwhile the dead Christian soldiers' families and those closest to them insist their slain sons and brothers were happy and healthy, that they were observant Christians, and that there was evidence that they were being persecuted by their Muslim "brothers-in-arms" for their evident Christianity.

For example, in the aforementioned case of Matthew Habib, the murdered Christian was shot twice — and still authorities maintain it was suicide.  (Click here for several more examples of military authorities offering bizarre reasons for the deaths, all rejected by the victims' Christian families.)

Why these Christians are being killed is not difficult to comprehend.  For many Muslims in Egypt, Nigeria, and elsewhere, war is synonymous with jihad — and it doesn't do much for morale to have lowly infidels, who are themselves the prime targets of jihad, fighting alongside the practitioners of jihad.

These modern-day killings shed further light on a more theoretical — or rather theological — point.  One of the staples of the Islamic whitewashing industry is the claim that jizya — the extortion money subjugated Jews and Christians were and are required to pay (Koran 9:29) — actually "entitled them to Muslim protection from outside aggression and exempted them from military service," to quote Georgetown University's John Esposito.

By this widely held logic, Muslim invaders did not demand that the conquered non-Muslim populations ransom their lives with money — as virtually all Muslim jurists and historians explain it — but rather were kind enough to offer their infidel subjects "protection" and exemption from military service for a small fee.

However, and as the modern-day killings of Christian soldiers makes clear, Christians and Jews were "exempt" from military service not because they paid jizya tribute, but because, as conquered infidels, they themselves were the enemy and had to remain separate and subjugated — as Christian minorities in Muslim nations tend to till this day.  (As one example, requests to open or renovate churches are always met with mass violence and upheavals, often enabled if not instigated by local Muslim authorities: as infidels, Christians are not allowed to build or renovate temples of worship that openly challenge the teachings of Muhammad.)

Apologists like Esposito twist the facts around in another important way: while payment of jizya did indeed purchase "protection" (of a sort) for the conquered infidels, that protection was not against an outside hostile force, but against inside hostile forces — that is, Muslims themselves: sharia manuals make clear that failure to pay jizya made the lives of dhimmis forfeit.

Finally, and as if all the above was not enough, that the Koran itself requires conquered non-Muslims "to give the jizya willingly while they are humbled" (9:29) — or else — puts to rest any claim that payment of jizya was a mere business transaction justifying exemption from military but rather a ritual show of Islamic dominance over infidel subjects.

Raymond Ibrahim, author of Sword and Scimitar, is a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center, a Judith Rosen Friedman Fellow at the Middle East Forum, and a Distinguished Senior Fellow at the Gatestone Institute.

Image: CreaPark via PixabayPixabay License.


Alleged Boulder Colorado Gunman ID’d as Ahmad Al Aliwi Alissa

ahmad-alissa-bpd
Boulder Police Department
1:28

The gunman who allegedly opened fire in a Boulder, Colorado, grocery store on Monday has been identified as 21-year-old Ahmad Al Aliwi Alissa by the New York Times.

The New York Post reports that Alissa was charged with “charged with 10 counts of first-degree murder” on Tuesday.

Boulder police chief Maris Harold noted that Alissa lived in Arvada, Colorado, and pointed out that his ten alleged victims were between the ages of 20 and 65 years of age.

NPR reports that the deceased included 51-year-old police officer Eric Talley, who had been with the Boulder Police Department since 2010.

The New York Daily News observed that police do not have a motive behind the Boulder attack. But Gov. Jarid Polis reacted by saying, “Today we saw the face of evil. I am grieving with my community and all Coloradans.”

AWR Hawkins is an award-winning Second Amendment columnist for Breitbart News and the writer/curator of Down Range with AWR Hawkins, a weekly newsletter focused on all things Second Amendment. He is the political analyst for Armed American Radio. Follow him on Twitter: @AWRHawkins. Reach him directly at awrhawkins@breitbart.com. Sign up to get Down Range at breitbart.com/downrange.

Ten killed in mass shooting at Boulder, Colorado grocery store

Ten people, including three workers at the King Soopers grocery store in Boulder, Colorado, were killed Monday afternoon in the latest mass shooting to occur in the United States. The suspected shooter, 21-year-old Ahmad Al Aliwi Alissa, was taken into police custody Monday following a brief shootout that left 51-year-old Boulder Police officer and father of seven, Eric Talley, dead.

Alissa is currently detained in a local hospital after suffering an apparent gunshot wound to the leg. He has been charged with 10 counts of first-degree murder.

Police stand outside a King Soopers grocery store where a shooting took place, Monday, March 22, 2021, in Boulder, Colo. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski)

The ages of the victims range from 20 to 65. King Soopers has confirmed that three of the deceased were employees: an aspiring pilot, 20-year-old Denny Stong; front-end manager Rikki Olds (25) and Special Olympics track and field and skiing participant Teri Leiker (51).

Denny Stong (Credit: Facebook)

Nevin Stanisic (23), Tralona Bartkowiak (49), Suzanne Fountain (59), Kevin Mahoney (61), Lynn Murray (62) and Jody Waters (65) were also killed in the attack, which began shortly before 2:30 p.m. local time and ended with Alissa being led away in handcuffs just before 3:30 p.m.

Photos and video released from the scene show grocery store workers, hands on each other’s backs, helping to lead customers out of the store in single file lines, as hundreds of police and SWAT officers, along with drones, helicopters and armored vehicles, descend on the store. The market is less than two miles south of the University of Colorado at Boulder. None of the victims are believed to have been enrolled at the university.

The university, with an enrollment of over 33,000, is the social and economic center of Boulder. The city is relatively affluent, with a median income of $66,117. The median property value, at $645,600, is nearly triple the national average.

As a witness to the shooting, Ryan Borowksi, told CNN, “Boulder feels like a bubble, and that bubble burst. This feels like the safest place in America and I just nearly got killed for getting a soda and a bag of chips.”

The shooting comes one week after a 21-year-old Georgia man shot and killed eight people, including six women of Asian-American descent, at massage parlors in the Atlanta area, and five days after two workers were killed by a co-worker inside a Roundy’s grocery distribution center in Oconomowoc, Wisconsin.

The latest statistics from the Centers for Disease Control estimate that 111 people are killed every day in the US due to gun violence, with 39,707 people killed in 2019, a number that exceeds all other countries except Brazil.

As of yet, no information has surfaced that establishes a political motive, or points to links between Alissa and terrorist or extremist organizations. He appears to have been suffering from psychological distress, likely exacerbated by the pandemic.

Alissa resides in a suburb of Denver called Arvada, about 20 miles south of Boulder, sharing a residence with his brother and sister-in-law. Key details of his personal life, including whether he is employed or attending school, have not yet been made public.

He was enrolled at Arvada West High School from 2015 until he graduated in 2018. While in high school, he participated on the wrestling team, and on his Facebook profile he described himself as “Born in Syria 1999, came to the USA in 2002. I like wrestling and informational documentaries.”

On his Facebook page, Alissa posted videos of himself wrestling in high school and occasional posts about his Muslim faith. Like millions of other Facebook users, in November 2015 Alissa sympathized with victims of a series of ISIS-linked terrorist attacks. He changed his profile picture to the French flag in support of the victims of a mass terror attack in Paris.

In response to the far-right terrorist attack in April 2019 that targeted Christchurch, New Zealand mosques, Alissa shared a post that read: “The Muslims at the #christchurch mosque were not the victims of a single shooter, they were the victims of the entire Islamophobia industry that villified [sic] them.”

In interviews with investigators, members of Alissa’s family have stated that he may have been suffering from an undiagnosed mental illness. The Associated Press cited an unnamed official as revealing that Alissa’s family said he had complained of people following or chasing him.

In interviews with CNN and the Daily Beast, Alissa’s brother, Ahmad Al Aliwi Alissa, said that beginning around 2014, Alissa said he felt like he was being followed and became increasingly paranoid. Alissa said his brother put tape over his laptop camera to prevent anyone from observing him.

“He always suspected someone was behind him, someone was chasing him,” Ali Alwi Alissa said. “We kept a close eye on him when he was in high school. He would say, ‘Someone is chasing me, someone is investigating me,’ and we’re like, ‘Come on man, there’s nothing…’ He was just closing into himself.”

In interviews with the press and the police, Alissa’s brother reiterated that “[It was] not at all a political statement, it’s mental illness.” He told the Daily Beast that his younger brother “used to get bullied a lot in high school, he was like an outgoing kid, but after he went to high school and got bullied a lot, he started becoming anti-social."

Court records obtained by a local Fox affiliate, KDVR in Boulder, show that Alissa was arrested in 2017 after he allegedly punched a classmate in the head. At the time, Alissa reportedly said that the victim “had made fun of him and called him racial names weeks earlier.” Alissa plead guilty to a charge of assault.

Witnesses and the police warrant indicate that the shootings began outside the grocery store and that Alissa was armed with a “black AR-15 style” rifle and possibly body armor. Footage taken at the scene of the shooting shows that multiple victims were shot in the parking lot. The victims, according to statements given to investigators, included an older man whom Alissa allegedly shot multiple times as he stood over him. He then made his way into the grocery store.

Court documents allege that Alissa had purchased a Ruger AR-556 pistol on March 16, six days before the shooting. The affidavit, which was unsealed Tuesday, indicates that his sister-in-law, whose name is redacted, saw Alissa “playing with a firearm she thought looked like a ‘machine gun’” in the days prior to the shooting. Police have indicated that they recovered a “rifle” and a semiautomatic handgun at the scene.

While mass shootings have long since become a grotesquely regular feature American life, and an acute expression of the deeply dysfunctional character of US capitalist society, the country’s social, political and economic contradictions have intensified after a year of the pandemic.

Colorado has been home to a disproportionate number of mass shootings since the 1990s. A 2019 analysis by the Denver Post revealed that Colorado had more mass shootings per capita than all but four states, and that the Denver metropolitan area has had more school shootings per capita since 1999 than any of the other 24 largest metropolitan areas in the US. Alissa himself was born three days before the 1999 Columbine massacre.

In ritualistic fashion, Democratic and Republican politicians have offered their “thoughts and prayers,” while spouting their respective party’s political positions in the “debate” between gun rights and gun control. The Democratic party is once again promoting the panacea of limited restrictions on guns—such as the closing of “loopholes,” expansion of background checks and a ban on assault weapons—while the Republicans curry favor with their far-right supporters by opposing any limitation on what they proclaim to be their “Second Amendment” right to bear arms.

No section of the political or media establishment dares seriously examine the underlying social and political conditions that have made the US the scene of over 100 mass shootings since 1999, costing thousands of lives. Issues such as ever widening social inequality, endless wars abroad and the militarization of the police at home, and a general attack on science and culture are not raised because they point to the bankruptcy of capitalism and its ruling elite.

In bumbling comments Tuesday, President Joe Biden rehashed the usual clichès while joining fellow Democrats in calling for more gun control measures. At a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on reducing gun violence, Chairman Dick Durbin of Illinois cited two pieces of legislation passed by the House in 2017 that would supposedly close “gaps” in the federal background check system.

The Republican response was made clear in the opening comments of the ranking Republican member of the committee, Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley. Grassley used the hearing to raise the bogeyman of “left-wing extremism,” absurdly linking the Boulder shooting with last year’s mass protests against police murder.

“Statistics show that the murder rate in 2020 increased most significantly in June when the rioters were on the march and policy makers forced police into retreat,” Grassley declared.

Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton, an advocate of martial law to crush left-wing protests, said the “simple” solution to gun violence was “support our police, enforce our laws and lock up criminals.”

Palestinians Funneled Hundreds of Millions to Terrorists, State Dept Report Reveals

Biden administration remains intent on restarting aid to Palestinians

  •  
  •  
  •  
Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas / Getty Images

The Biden administration privately confirmed to Congress last week that the Palestinian Authority has continued to use international aid money to reward terrorists but said the finding won't impact its plans to restart funding.

In a non-public State Department report obtained by the Washington Free Beacon, the administration said the Palestinians spent at least $151 million in 2019 on its "pay-to-slay" program, in which international aid dollars are spent to support imprisoned terrorists and their families. Financial statements further indicate that at least $191 million was spent on "deceased Palestinians referred to as ‘martyrs.’" Despite this practice, which violates U.S. law and prompted the Trump administration to freeze aid to the Palestinians, the "Biden-Harris Administration has made clear its intent to restart assistance to the Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza," according to the report.

It remains unclear how the Biden administration will restart American aid without violating a 2018 bipartisan law known as the Taylor Force Act, which prohibits the U.S. government from resuming Palestinian aid until the payments to terrorists are stopped. The latest report on the matter is likely to rankle pro-Israel lawmakers in Congress who see the payments as a gift to the Palestinian government as it continues to sponsor terrorism and foment anti-Israel hatred.

A spokesman for Sen. Ted Cruz (R., Texas), a primary backer of the Taylor Force Act and proponent of continuing the freeze of Palestinian aid, told the Free Beacon the Biden administration is currently planning to skirt American laws barring taxpayer dollars from reaching the Palestinian government.

"Congress correctly and overwhelmingly passed the Taylor Force Act to limit assistance to areas controlled by the Palestinian Authority, because the Palestinian Authority just shifts fungible resources to pay terrorists," the spokesman said. "Sen. Cruz is concerned that in the rush to elevate the Palestinians and downgrade the U.S.-Israel relationship, the Biden administration is looking for ways to circumvent the restrictions on American taxpayer dollars going to those areas in ways that will benefit the Palestinian Authority."

The State Department admitted it was "unable to certify" to Congress that the Palestinian Authority and Palestine Liberation Organization are complying with the Taylor Force Act, primarily because they have "not terminated payments for acts of terrorism to any individual, after being fairly tried, who has been imprisoned for such acts of terrorism and to any individual who died committing such acts of terrorism, including to a family member of such individuals," according to the report.

The Palestinian government continues to fund the "pay-to-slay" program, the State Department confirmed in the unclassified March 18 report. A classified version of the report with "additional information on the amount the PA is believed to have transferred to" terrorists during 2019 also was produced by the State Department. Those figures, which likely stand at more than $155 million in 2020 alone, could galvanize a bipartisan coalition of lawmakers to publicly oppose the Biden administration’s efforts to resume Palestinian aid. 

Currently, "plans for [resuming] this assistance are being developed, and the resumption of assistance to the West Bank and Gaza, including any assistance for the PA using [fiscal year] 2020 funds, will be fully consistent with applicable requirements under U.S. law," the administration claims in the report without explaining exactly how it will legally execute that plan.

Another private State Department memo outlining the Biden administration’s efforts to increase diplomacy with the Palestinian government indicates that U.S. aid dollars will start flowing again at the end of March or early April, according to a copy of that memo recently leaked in the press.

In addition to paying terrorists and their families, the State Department determined the Palestinian government has "not taken proactive steps to counter incitement to violence against Israel." Thus, the U.S. government also could not certify for Congress that the PA has made good on repeated promises to end incitement and recommit to peace negotiations.

The report highlights contradictory statements by PA president Mahmoud Abbas made throughout 2020 promising to pursue peace and also continue terror operations against Israel. Moreover, "incitement to violence and glorification of terrorism occur in public statements and social media posts by PA officials and politicians, in official media broadcasts and social media outlets, and in school textbooks," according to the report.

Palestinian Media Watch, an Israeli watchdog group, recently determined the Palestinian government spent around 3.2 percent of its total 2020 budget, or $155 million, on the "pay-to-slay" program. Many of these payments were obscured by the PA, which funneled some $300 million to the PLO so that it could continue payment to terrorists in violation of U.S. law.

No comments: