Friday, February 25, 2022

TWO ETHICALLY DEPRAVED SOCIOPATH LAWYERS - JOE BIDEN AND ANTONY BLINKEN - WANT TO TALK ABOUT CRACKHEAD LAWYER HUNTER? - Blinken: We’re Not Halting Gas and Oil Purchases from Russia Because We’re Trying to Minimize ‘Pain to Us’

THE BIDEN'S AND BANKSTERS

A FAMILY OF BRIBES SUCKING PARASITE LAWYERS

The Tragic Tale of Hunter Biden



Blinken: We’re Not Halting Gas and Oil Purchases from Russia Because We’re Trying to Minimize ‘Pain to Us’

1:09

On Thursday’s broadcast of “CBS Evening News,” Secretary of State Antony Blinken responded to a question on whether the United States will cut off purchases of oil and gas from Russia over its invasion of Ukraine by stating that we’re trying to ensure “that we inflict maximum pain on Russia” while at the same time, “minimizing any of the pain to us.”

Host Norah O’Donnell asked, “Russia’s economy’s fueled by gas, and the U.S. is a consumer. So, would the U.S. consider cutting off oil and gas purchases from Russia?”

Blinken responded, “Well, what we’re doing, Norah, across the board, is making sure that we inflict maximum pain on Russia for what President Putin has done, while minimizing any of the pain to us.”

He also stated, “We’re in full coordination with other countries, both consumers and producers alike, to minimize any impact that this may have on energy prices and on gasoline.”

Follow Ian Hanchett on Twitter @IanHanchett

Blackburn: Putin ‘Feels Like Biden Is Weak’ — ‘He’s Had a Runway from the Biden Administration’

1:38

Thursday on Fox Business Network’s “Mornings with Maria,” Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) reacted to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Blackburn asserted that “thug” Russian President Vladimir Putin “feels like Biden is weak,” which has led to his escalation in Ukraine.

“Of course, this shows you what a thug Vladimir Putin is,” Blackburn asserted. “And he feels like he’s had a runway from the Biden administration. Biden gave him everything he asked for. He gave him a five-year renewal on New START with no conditions. Trump had said he would give him one year with conditions. He gave him Nord Stream 2, so he feels like Biden is weak. This is what you get when someone displays weakness. My hope is that today Biden is going to step up and be very firm in their sanctions.”

“I do understand, Maria, that NATO will have an emergency meeting tomorrow,” she continued. “We do understand the G-7 will meet with the president, virtually, of course, all of these. They will do that today. We do understand that other countries are moving forward quickly with placing sanctions — the E.U., the U.K., Japan. I think one thing that is going to be interesting to watch in this is how China supports Russia. You have Russia, China, Iran, North Korea. That is your new axis of evil, and to see how China will try to soften the sanctions on Russia and on Putin.”

Follow Trent Baker on Twitter @MagnifiTrent

THE BIDEN'S AND BANKSTERS

A FAMILY OF BRIBES SUCKING PARASITE LAWYERS

The Tragic Tale of Hunter Biden




Hunter Biden Laptop Interview Body Language (2021)



Kamala Saves The Day





Watch: Biden in 2001 Praises Putin for Embracing the West, Compares Him to Peter the Great

Vice President of the United States Joe Biden, left, shakes hands with Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin in Moscow, Russia, Thursday, March 10, 2011. The talks in Moscow are expected to focus on missile defense cooperation and Russia's efforts to join the World Trade Organization. (AP Photo/Alexander Zemlianichenko)
AP Photo/Alexander Zemlianichenko
3:21

A video unearthed from 2001 by the Republican National Committee’s research team revealed then-Senator Biden praising Russian President Vladimir Putin for embracing the West, heralding his actions as comparable to Peter the Great.

“I’m close to amazed by how far Putin seems to have come in making – throwing – his lot in with the West,” Biden said as chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. “He seems to have – out of all the briefings I’ve gotten – actually stiff-armed his military and stiff-armed some of the browns and reds in his government and out of government.”

“And made a very – I don’t think anybody since Peter the Great has made such a significant – at least an initial move to the West,” Biden claimed:

Peter the Great was the first Emperor of Russia. Through multiple wars, he expanded the nation into a major European power. He also moved to transpose medieval political systems with the western enlightenment.

Biden’s comparison of Putin with Peter the Great is unfounded. Putin is seeking to restore the lost twentieth-century boundary of the old Soviet Union and denied the “real statehood” of Ukraine in a televised address to the nation on Monday. Putin further stated Ukraine was part of Russia’s “own history, culture, spiritual space.”

Biden has a history of questionable foreign policy judgment and analysis. Robert Gates, George W. Bush and Barack Obama’s secretary of defense, wrote in 2014 that Biden “has been wrong on nearly every major foreign policy and national security issue over the past four decades.”

Biden’s foreign policy judgment before he became president are as follows:

  • Suggested sending $200 million to Iran, “no strings attached.”
  • Voted against the successful Persian Gulf War that forced Saddam Hussein out of Kuwait.
  • Insisted “the Taliban per se is not our enemy.”
  • Opposed the troop surges that brought some stability to both Iraq and Afghanistan
  • Claimed he was responsible for ending the genocide in Bosnia
  • Voted against trade agreements with Singapore, Chile, Oman, and the Dominican Republic
  • Opposed the raid to kill Osama bin Laden, telling Obama “don’t go.”
  • Opposed killing Iranian terrorist Qasem Soleimani

On Tuesday, former President Donald Trump asserted that Russia’s “taking over” of Ukraine is due to Biden’s weakness. “I know Vladimir Putin very well, and he would have never done during the Trump Administration what he is doing now, no way!”

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) told CBS News Biden’s decisions as president could increase the price for a barrel of oil past $100 and perhaps to $115.

“I don’t believe the sanctions will stop them from doing what their plan is but I do think that if you don’t pay a price for doing this, he’s going to do more of it,” Rubio said. “I think Ukrainians are gonna fight back but this is gonna have an impact on Americans even though it seems to be really far away.”

Gas prices are already at their highest level since 2014.

Follow Wendell Husebø on Twitter and Gettr @WendellHusebø

Sanctions Against Russia Include Designation of ‘Elites’ – But Not Putin

By Patrick Goodenough | February 22, 2022 | 11:25pm EST

  
President Biden prepares for his summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Geneva last June. (Photo by Mikhail Svetlov/Getty Images)
President Biden prepares for his summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Geneva last June. (Photo by Mikhail Svetlov/Getty Images)

(CNSNews.com) – Russian President Vladimir Putin is not himself targeted in the sanctions rolled out by the Biden administration on Tuesday, although a White House official said that “no option is off the table, as the president said.”

Among the package of measures responding to Putin’s recognition of two proxy states in eastern Ukraine are sanctions against five individuals, described by deputy national security advisor for international economics Daleep Singh as elites who “share in the corrupt gains of the Kremlin, and they will now share in the pain.”

“Other Russian elites and their family members are now on notice that additional actions could be taken on them as well,” he said during a White House briefing. 

Asked what it would take to target Putin directly, and why the decision was not taken on Tuesday, Singh replied, “I'm not going to telegraph exactly what it would take and under what circumstances that would occur. But no option is off the table, as the president said.”

President Biden described the sanctions announced Tuesday as a “first tranche,” and said that the U.S. and allies “will continue to escalate sanctions if Russia escalates.”

He described Putin’s recognition of the “people’s republics” of Donetsk and Luhansk as “the beginning of a Russian invasion of Ukraine.”

Asked last month if he could envisage Putin personally being sanctioned, should Russia invade Ukraine, Biden replied “yes,” then added, “I would see that.”

Biden went on to say there would be “enormous consequences” for Russia if Putin sent his forces in to invade the entire country of Ukraine – “or a lot less than that as well” – although he did say he was referring not only to economic and political costs for Russia, but also to consequences worldwide.

 

In Paris on Tuesday, European Union foreign policy chief Josep Borrell also confirmed that Putin was not among 27 Russian individuals and entities targeted in new E.U. sanctions for “playing a role in undermining or threatening Ukrainian territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence.”

Sanctions announced by the U.K. government included three oligarchs – “three very high net worth individuals,” in Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s words – but not Putin.

While U.S. sanctions against sitting heads of state are not common, there have been precedents.

The U.S. in 2016 sanctioned North Korea’s Kim Jong Un for human rights abuses, and U.S. administrations have sanctioned Belarus President Alexander Lukashenko since 2006, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad since 2011, and former Burmese strongman Than Shwe since 2007.

Other former heads of state sanctioned in past years include Charles Taylor in Liberia, and the late Robert Mugabe in Zimbabwe, Iraq’s Saddam Hussein, and Muammar Gaddafi in Libya.

‘Kleptocracy’

The U.S. Treasury Department described the five individuals targeted by the U.S. as “powerful Russians in Putin’s inner circle believed to be participating in the Russian regime’s kleptocracy and their family members.”

The sanctions block any property and property interests the five men have in the U.S., block any entities in which they own at least 50 percent stake, and make liable for sanctions any person or financial institution that does business with them.

Two of the five are already under U.S. sanctions – imposed last March in response to the attempted assassination by nerve agent of Kremlin critic Alexei Navalny in 2020.

They are Sergei Kiriyenko, a former prime minister and head of the state nuclear energy giant Rosatom, who is currently first deputy chief of staff at the Kremlin; and Aleksandr Bortnikov, director of the Federal Security Service (FSB), successor to the Soviet KGB.

Kiriyenko and Bortnikov, along with a third of the five men listed – Bortnikov’s son, Denis Bortnikov, deputy president and chairman of the management board of one of Russia’s biggest banks, VTB Bank – are among 35 Russians listed in the FY2022 National Defense Authorization Act.

The legislation, which Biden signed into law last December, requires the president within 180 days (that is, by June 25) to submit to Congress a determination on whether the 35 individuals named should be sanctioned under the Global Magnitsky Act, a 2016 law that provides for punitive measures against human rights abusers and corrupt actors.

The other two Russian “elites” targeted in the sanctions announced on Tuesday are:

--Kiriyenko’s son, Vladimir Kiriyenko, a former vice president of the state-controlled digital service provider Rostelecom, and now CEO of Russia’s biggest social media network company, VK.

--Petr Fradkov, CEO of Promsvyazbank, a state-backed bank that supports Russia’s defense sector. (He is also the son of a former prime minister and foreign intelligence service (SVR) chief Mikhail Fradkov, who was sanctioned by the Trump administration in 2018 “in response to worldwide malign activity.)

‘A glorified piggy bank for the Kremlin’

The sanctions against the five are part of a broader package, the most significant including the blocking of two major banks and their subsidiaries. The two are Promsvyazbank and Vnesheconombank (VEB), Russia’s fifth-largest financial institution, which Singh called “a glorified piggy bank for the Kremlin that holds more than $50 billion in assets.”

The two banks will no longer be able to carry out any transactions with the U.S. or Europe, and their assets in the U.S. and European financial systems are frozen.

Other highlights were an agreement by Germany to shut down the controversial Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline, and the cutting off of the Russian government from Western financing, meaning the Kremlin will no longer be able to raise money from the U.S. and Europe, or trade new debt in U.S. or European markets.

“This was the beginning of an invasion, and this is the beginning of our response,” Singh said.


Poll: Biden’s Approval Rating Underwater on Russia/Ukraine Conflict 

ukraine
Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images
2:23

President Joe Biden’s approval rating on the Russia/Ukraine conflict is underwater, a Wednesday Politico/MorningConsult poll revealed.

Just 40 percent of voters approved of Biden’s management of the conflict, while 45 disapproved, including 35 percent who said they strongly disapproved.

Overall, the poll handed Biden a negative approval rating (44 – 53 percent).

A majority (58 – 28 percent) of respondents also indicated they would find Biden responsible if the Russian/Ukrainian conflict increases American gas prices.

Biden told the nation on Tuesday Americans will bear a financial cost for the conflict. “Defending freedom will have costs, for us as well, and here at home,” he said upon announcing sanctions on Russia. “We need to be honest about that.”

Moscow’s ambassador to the United States Anatoly Antonov seemed to agree with Biden, suggesting that the sanctions will hurt American consumers more than Russians.

“There is no doubt that the sanctions imposed against us will hurt the global financial and energy markets,” Antonov said. “The United States will not be left out, where ordinary citizens will feel the full consequences of rising prices.”

“With regard to Moscow, new US sanctions will not solve anything, Russia has learned to work and develop under restrictions,” he added.

With gas prices expected to increase, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) told CBS News on Tuesday the price for a barrel could surpass $100 and perhaps reach $115. Gas prices are already at their highest level since 2014.

“I don’t believe the sanctions will stop them from doing what their plan is but I do think that if you don’t pay a price for doing this, he’s going to do more of it,” Rubio said. “I think Ukrainians are gonna fight back but this is gonna have an impact on Americans even though it seems to be really far away.”

The national average price of gas per gallon is $3.535, up nearly a dollar from last year’s price of $2.645.

Follow Wendell Husebø on Twitter and Gettr @WendellHusebø

W.H. Deputy NSA on Ukraine’s Call for More Sanctions: ‘There’s Almost a Bloodlust’ for Sanctions, But I’m Not Saying Ukraine Has It

1:56

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “New Day,” Deputy National Security Adviser Daleep Singh responded to Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba’s call for harsher sanctions against Russia by stating that he wonders “if there’s almost a bloodlust out there for sanctions as an end in themselves.” But denied he was saying Kuleba has this bloodlust and said the sanctions announced on Tuesday were “a demonstration effect, and that demonstration effect will go higher and higher.”

Co-host John Berman read from Kuleba’s tweet and then asked, “How do you explain to the Ukrainian Foreign Minister why you are not hitting harder now?”

Singh responded, “Well, John, sometimes I wonder if there’s almost a bloodlust out there for sanctions as an end in themselves. But let me just be really clear, we did hit hard yesterday, and it was only a demonstration effect. … But the point the Ukrainians are making is right. These costs are going to escalate from here.”

Berman then asked who Singh thinks has a bloodlust for sanctions. Singh answered, “I hear it from many in the media, why didn’t you impose all of your sanctions on day one? And so, what I’m saying to you is, we saw the beginning of an invasion yesterday –.”

Berman then cut in to point out he was quoting Ukraine’s Foreign Minister, and ask, “So, does the Ukrainian Foreign Minister have a bloodlust for sanctions?”

Singh answered, “No. No. I’m not saying that. I’m saying I hear from questions out there and commentary, people wondering why didn’t we implement the full package of sanctions yesterday. And what I’m saying to you is, yesterday was a demonstration effect, and that demonstration effect will go higher and higher.”

Follow Ian Hanchett on Twitter @IanHanchett

Joe Biden Sanctions Russia’s Nord Stream 2 Pipeline Nine Months After Lifting Donald Trump’s Sanctions

President Joe Biden speaks in the South Court Auditorium in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building on the White House complex, Tuesday, Feb. 22, 2022, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon) Pipes at the landfall facilities of the 'Nord Stream 2' gas pipline are pictured in Lubmin, northern Germany, Tuesday, Feb. 15, …
(AP Photo/Alex Brandon)(AP Photo/Michael Sohn)
1:48

President Joe Biden announced Wednesday he would level sanctions on Russia’s proposed Nord Stream 2 Pipeline, after lifting sanctions on the project put in place by former President Donald Trump.

“Today, I have directed my administration to impose sanctions on Nord Stream 2 AG and its corporate officers,” Biden said in a statement detailing his decision.

In May 2021, Biden lifted sanctions for the pipeline, arguing it would be difficult, if not impossible, for him to block the project.

“It’s almost completely finished … it’s not like I can allow Germany to do something or not,” Biden said at the time, explaining why he was willing to lift sanctions.

Biden argued at the time that lifting the Trump-era sanctions was important to rebuilding America’s relationship with Europe, calling them “counterproductive.”

On Monday, Germany announced they would halt the Nord Stream 2 pipeline project after Putin sent troops into Ukraine for the sake of “peacekeeping” in two provinces of the country which had declared independence.

The pipeline project, once supported by the Germans, was considered a politically disastrous move for national security regions, allowing Russia to bypass Ukraine to provide natural gas to Europe.

Ukraine’s president Volodymyr Zelensky repeatedly criticized President Joe Biden and European leaders for allowing the project to continue.

“We were very unpleasantly surprised,” Zelensky said in June when asked about Biden’s decision.

He described the pipeline as “a weapon in the hands of the Russian Federation” and said he was confused by Biden’s actions that helped Russia.

Doddering Biden volunteers America for higher energy prices to defend Ukraine's borders

After failing to plan for the obvious contingencies, a doddering Joe Biden turned up late to his own press conference and announced that he's volunteering America for higher energy prices as a result of his feeble bid to defend Ukraine's borders.

America first?  Not by anyone normal's measurement:

Defending freedom will have cost for us as well, and here at home," Biden said. "We need to be honest about that.

Freedom?  He's suddenly all in for freedom?  He sounded like George W. Bush, that same George whose dad annoyingly warned Ukraine about its "suicidal nationalism" back in 1989 in what came to be called his "Chicken Kiev" speech.  Neither Bush knew what was going on over there, nor does Biden.

Nothing in that line or in much of the Ukraine policy that preceded it has ever been particularly choate.  Ukraine is no democracy, having changed its government not too long ago in 2014 by Soros- and Obama administration–inspired machinations, and ten years earlier as well.  Its politics are "poisonous."  It ranks a lowly 86 of 167 countries evaluated for democracy on the Economist Intelligence Unit's 2021 Democracy Index, tied with Mexico, and an even worse 122 out of 186 countries evaluated on Transparency International's 2021 Corruption Perceptions Index.  The corruption, which Joe Biden helped perpetrate, is the exact reason Ukraine can't get into NATO, which would have saved it from a Russian invasion.  Meanwhile, the place is severely polarized, with the eastern regions identifying with next-door Russia, the western regions identifying with neighbors like Poland and Lithuania, and apparently no happy middle.

So now that Russia has invaded, Biden's volunteering us for higher energy prices in the name of defending that unstable, unsustainable mess, which just happens to be a profit center for his son Hunter and some of his no-show jobs, which, as he said, he would not have gotten "if my name wasn't Biden."  Joe, according to those messages from Hunter's abandoned computer, is "the big guy" who skims his "ten percent."

But fear not.  The shuffling president, slurring his speech (see for yourself here — and here), says he's got a plan for the problems that have come of all this.

"I'm going to take robust action to make sure the pain of our sanctions is targeted at [the] Russian economy, not ours." 

He said the administration is "closely monitoring" energy supplies for any disruption.

"This will blunt gas prices. I want to limit the pain the American people are feeling at the gas pump," Biden said.  

His sanctions are largely redundant, mostly the same sanctions imposed earlier by President Trump, so the sanctions don't mean much — Russian markets rose at the news of such weak measures.

His claim to be monitoring energy supplies, as his way to "blunt" the effect of higher gas prices is a joke, too.  How exactly does watching prices have anything to do with lowering prices?  It's about as believable as wearing masks to stop the spread of COVID-19 or "rigorous" vetting for imported Afghan "refugees."

If he were actually serious about this, he wouldn't have gotten into a confrontation with Putin in the first place — at the bare minimum.

But there's also the sorry fact that we now import about twice the oil from Putin under the Biden administration as we did under President Trump, making ourselves very, very dependent on Putin's goodwill. The Germans cut off their own Nordstream 2 project with Russia in response to the invasion of Ukraine, and yes, their energy costs will skyrocket.  Is Joe planning to cut off Russian oil imports in the same way?  Or is he going to keep America buying to keep the dollars flowing to Putin, except that now Putin will decide if he wants to sell?  Haven't heard a thing from Biden about it.

Worse still, Biden has yet to restore America's energy independence.  He cut off the well-along-the-way Keystone XL pipeline from Canada, which would have supplied 830,000 barrels of Canadian tar sand crude to U.S. refineries had it been completed.  That's about a third more than the 595,000 barrels per day of oil the U.S. imports from Russia these days.  We would have been fat and happy and secure in our energy on that alone had Biden not pulled that one. 

He's also shut down new leases for drilling on federal lands, making the U.S. even more dependent on overseas fuel from petro-tyrants.  When Biden asked OPEC to pump more, the sheikhs thumbed their noses at him, and from their point of view, with good reason — Joe was also busy lifting sanctions from Iran to restore Ben Rhodes's and Colin Kahl's pet project — which was not received kindly by the big OPEC producers in the Middle East, who are literally threatened by the mullahs.

Way to go on the planning there, Joe.

But all this is laughable all by itself.  Joe Biden and his administration minions have openly called for higher gas prices as a means of getting America to shift to "alternative" green energy.  This unsustainable energy becomes competitive only when fossil fuel prices rise.  That, above all, is likely why Joe will just watch prices rise at the pump instead of doing something to lower those prices.

His big master plan, in other words, is to blame Putin for his own energy failures, which he can correct on a dime if he were serious about solving them.  That should make Putin happy as he cries all the way to the bank over the toothless Biden sanctions.  There's a reason Putin has been caught bankrolling greenie groups touting useless alternative energy schemes over fossil fuels.  Biden might as well applaud him because that's whose agenda he's supporting with this sorry show.

Image: Screen shot from C-SPAN video, via shareable YouTube.

U.S. Trade Deficit With Russia Up 93.9% in 2021

By Terence P. Jeffrey | February 22, 2022 | 11:24am EST

  

Russian President Vladimir Putin and U.S. President Joe Biden in Geneva, Switzerland, June 16, 2021. (Photo by Peter Klaunser-Pool/Keystone vis Getty Images)
Russian President Vladimir Putin and U.S. President Joe Biden in Geneva, Switzerland, June 16, 2021. (Photo by Peter Klaunzer-Pool/Keystone via Getty Images)

(CNSNews.com) - The United States merchandise trade deficit with Russia increased by 93.9 in 2021, according to data published this month by the Census Bureau.

In 2020, when President Donald Trump was in office, the United States imported $16,901,100,000 in goods from Russia and exported $4,886,900,000 to Russia, resulting in a bilateral trade deficit of $12,014,2000,000.

In 2021, when Joe Biden took office, the United States imported $29,695,100,000 in goods from Russia and exported $6,388,300,000 to Russia, resulting in a trade deficit of $23,306,800,000.

That was a one-year increase of $11,292,600,000—or 93.9%.

The Census Bureau has reported the U.S.-Russia merchandise trade balance going back to 1992, which was the first year after the demise of the Soviet Union. In 1992 and 1993, the United States ran relatively small trade surpluses with Russia ($1,631,100,000 and $1,226,900,000).

Then, in 1994, the United States ran a merchandise trade deficit of $66,900,000 with Russia. In every year since then, the United States has continued to run a trade deficit with Russia. 2021 was the 28th straight year that the United States has run a trade deficit with Russia.

The largest U.S. trade deficit with Russia came in 2011, when it hit $26,300,600,000. The second largest was last year’s $23,306,800,000.

The Top Ten imports the United States bought from Russia in 2021, according to the Census Bureau, were fuel oil ($10,265,587,048); crude oil ($4,714,801,618); other precious metals ($2,594,065,110); petroleum products, other ($2,528,835,6662); steelmaking materials ($1,638,966,123); fish and shellfish ($1,202,782,496); chemicals and fertilizers ($1,178,648,667); iron and steel mill products ($1,040,637,351); nuclear fuel materials ($688,757,733); and bauxite and aluminum ($528,663,788).

No comments: