America Faces No Greater Threat Than Joe Biden and the Democrat Party. Their Assault to Our Borders Is As Great As Their Assault to Free Speech and Free Elections
Thursday, March 24, 2022
JOE BIDEN'S ASSAULT ON HOMELAND SECURITY - And most Americans don't even know there's a jihad threat from which they need to be saved.
MORE GROUNDS FOR IMPEACHMENT
Old Joe Biden’s handlers have essentially erased the Southern border, and as a result, illegals are streaming in at a rapid clip.
Miami Imam Muses: Why Has Allah Not Destroyed America and All Homosexuals?
Fadi Kablawi blames women for rape, says gays should thank him for their continued existence.
Koran 2:191 "s lay the unbelievers wherever you find them" Koran 3:21 "Muslims must not take the infidels as friends" Koran 5:33 "Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticize Islam" Koran 8:12 "Terrorize and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the Koran" Koran 8:60 " Muslims must muster all weapons to terrorize the infidels" Koran 8:65 "The unbelievers are stupid, urge all Muslims to fight them" Koran 9:5 "When the opportunity arises, kill the infidels wherever you find them" Koran 9:123 "Make war on the infidels living in your neighborhood" Koran 22:19 "Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron rods, boiling water, melt their skin and bellies" Koran 47:4 "Do not hanker for peace with the infidels, behead them when you catch them".
Who are these people who will stream in? What is their background? THEY'RE UNREGISTERED DEM VOTERS WHO WILL WORK CHEAP AND SUCK BIG WELFARE TO VOTE DEMOCRAT FOR MORE!
The Border Is Open, and Al-Qaeda Is Calling on Jihadis to Come In
And most Americans don't even know there's a jihad threat from which they need to be saved.
Old Joe Biden’s handlers have essentially erased the Southern border, and as a result, illegals are streaming in at a rapid clip. Even the New York Times, a reliable Leftist propaganda organ, admitted last October that “migrants were encountered 1.7 million times in the last 12 months, the highest number of illegal crossings recorded since at least 1960.” A new record could be set in 2022, as the UK’s Daily Mailreported Thursday that “more than 170,000 migrants are waiting on the Mexican-side of the U.S.-Mexico border to cross and claim asylum” once the Biden administration trashes, as it is expected to do, Title 42, a Trump-era provision that allowed illegal migrants to be expelled during the COVID-19 hysteria. And as all this is unfolding, al-Qaeda has published a new online magazine encouraging jihad terrorists to immigrate to the United States and commit massacres here. It looks as if yet another Biden-caused disaster is in the offing.
Those 170,000 migrants, according to the Daily Mail, will be just the beginning: “The U.S. could be just hours away from another wave of mass migration if the Biden administration lifts Title 42.” Who are these people who will stream in? What is their background? Come on, man! Nobody knows, and apparently, no one in the Biden administration cares. They’re coming here, they’ll go on welfare, they’ll vote Democrat, and that’s all that matters. Criminals? Terrorists? Maybe — indeed, probably — but who cares?
Terrorists are watching, too. On Wednesday, according to the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI), an al-Qaeda group called Hurras Al-Tawheed (that is, Guardians of Monotheism) published an issue of the online magazine “Mujahedeen in the West.” The lead article is an extended defense of the Islamic concept of hijra (moving to a non-Muslim land in order to expand the scope and influence of Islam) and a refutation of claims that this was a duty for Muslims only in the time of Muhammad but not today.
The concept of hijra is based in part on the Qur’an, which tells Muslims, “Whoever emigrates for the sake of Allah will find much refuge and abundance in the earth, and whoever forsakes his home, a refugee for Allah and his messenger, and death overtakes him, his reward is then obligatory upon Allah. Allah is always forgiving, merciful.” (4:100) Muhammad himself, according to Islamic tradition, performed the first hijra when he moved from Mecca, where he was born, to Medina, where he became for the first time a political and military leader as well as a religious one. This is extremely significant in Islamic theology, for the Qur’an holds up Muhammad as the “excellent example” (33:21), to be emulated in every possible respect.
The al-Qaeda magazine argues strongly that Muslims should be immigrating to infidel lands today, even saying, “Woe to the liars, as the angels told the Muslims who remained [that is, didn’t embark on a hijra] and were given hellfire. The angels told the Muslims who did not do hijrah that their destination will be JAHANNAM [hell].”
In another article, the jihadis exhorted “the Lions of Allah:” “Do not waste your time on small lone wolf attacks, go to their embassies, courts, security checkpoints and strike them in their gathering of unbelief.” It praised Muslims who live in “the abode of unbelief” (e.g., the United States) but nevertheless “manage to be guided by Allah and choose to live for the religion of Allah and not the religion of Democracy.” These strong believers “did not submit to the fragile emasculated, pro-feminist, pro-LGBTQTAGHUT+ ‘Islam.’” Taghut is the idolatrous rule of disbelievers.
After that, the magazine really gets down to business, providing aspiring jihadis with detailed bomb-making instructions.
Now, is it possible that any young jihadi will read this magazine and decide to take advantage of Old Joe’s essentially nonexistent Southern border to enter the United States and set off his homemade bomb here? Of course, it is. In August 2021, outgoing Border Patrol chief Rodney Scott warned that the Southern border was “a national security crisis,” with “TSDBs at a level we have never seen before. That’s a real threat.” TSDB is the Terrorist Screening Database; Scott meant that suspected jihad terrorists were streaming into the U.S. at record levels. And what was there to stop them?
The al-Qaeda magazine’s last article addresses non-Muslims who are sounding the alarm about the ongoing jihad threat. “We enjoy your distress by our magazines,” it says. “May our words continue to give you restless nights. We see your tweets, and articles. Go ahead! Continue barking and tweeting. While we can enjoy your concern and distress. The majority of disbelievers will not even listen to you. Funny how you try to ‘save’ them.”
Yes, it’s funny, because most Americans at this point have no idea that there is a jihad threat from which they need to be saved. I myself have been calling attention to it for well over twenty years, and for my pains have been called a “rogue academic,” a “bigot,” and far worse, even “antichrist.” The establishment media doesn’t want you to know that there is a jihad, or that it threatens Americans, and has done its best to defame and destroy those who have called attention to it. Unfortunately, that will not make the threat go away.
While the world justifiably worries about the expansion of Russia under Vladimir Putin, another world power is slowly expanding its reach.
It’s called Islam. Unlike Russia, Islam is not one large land mass, but it does cover a lot of territory. There are 57 member nations in the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) making the OIC the largest voting bloc in the United Nations.
The world’s attention is currently focused on Russia, but it would be unwise to forget about Islam. Whereas the population of Russia is about 145 million and declining, Islam’s global population is approximately 1.8 billion and growing.
It’s becoming clear that Russia under Putin is expansionist. But it’s difficult to know to what extent. Will Russia be satisfied in neutralizing Ukraine? Or does it hope to reassert control over its former satellites in Europe? Or does it seek to control all of Europe?
Coincidentally, some of the territory that Russia covets was once controlled by Islam, and many Muslims believe that any territory once conquered by Islam still belongs to Islam.
Like today’s Russia, Islam is expansionist. Subjugating the entire world under the rule of Allah is, arguably, the chief purpose of Islam. And history confirms that gobbling up land in order to spread the faith is precisely what Islam has always done.
Within 100 years of Muhammad’s death, Islam had conquered all of North Africa and Spain as well. And the conquests continued for many centuries. About half of the world’s great empires were Islamic empires and some of them were of immense size and power.
However, when discussing present day Islamic expansion, it’s important to realize that expansion is not always a matter of conquest and the acquisition of new territory. The Organization of Islamic Cooperation hasn’t added any new members for quite a while, but that doesn’t mean that the Islamic world hasn’t been expanding.
In recent decades Islam has increased its influence through a combination of high birth rates, migration, and jihad terror.
We’re all familiar with examples of Islam’s population boom. Many Western citizens were surprised to learn about a decade ago that “Muhammad” was the most popular name for baby boys in several European cities; that Muslim children in cities such as Vienna and Birmingham outnumbered Christian children; and that Muslims had established “no-go zones” in some 750 locations in France—usually in suburban areas of major cities such as Paris, Lyon, and Marseille.
But Europe had a small Muslim population to begin with. So, the increase in the Muslim population wasn’t as noticeable at first. It is now, however. A recent Harris poll of French people revealed that 61 percent are worried that Europe’s white, Christian populations are being threatened with extinction by immigration from African and Muslim countries.
In one of Hemingway’s novels, one of the characters offers a succinct explanation of how he went bankrupt: “two ways, gradually and then suddenly.” Europe is still in the “gradual” phase of demographic bankruptcy, but it is fast approaching “suddenly.”
In Africa, where population is more evenly divided between Muslims and Christians, the situation is more critical. North Africa, of course, is almost totally Muslim, and has been for centuries. But there’s a possibility that sub-Saharan Africa could eventually follow suit. That’s because the Muslim population in sub-Saharan Africa is expected to grow at a faster rate than the Christian population. Between 2010 to 2050, according to the Pew Research Center, the Muslim population is projected to increase by 170 percent versus a 115 percent increase for Christians
That figure, however, doesn’t take into account the war of attrition that Muslim jihadists are waging against Christians throughout Africa. The actual decline of the Christian population in Africa is probably much higher. Except for the fact that Christianity in Africa is of a hardier sort than that practiced in Europe, one might say that Africa is much closer to the “suddenly” phase.
Surprisingly, relations between Muslims and Christians in Africa were much friendlier in the not-too-distant past. In general, Christians and Muslims were good neighbors to each other. The Islam practiced in the Southern half of Africa seemed to be of a more relaxed nature than that practiced in Saudi Arabia far to the north.
But eventually the radical message of the Iranian Revolution seems to have filtered down to some, if not all, of the sub-Saharan Muslim population. Which brings us to another factor that needs to be considered when discussing the expansion of Islam.
Population shifts, especially those that result from migration, always cause friction. But the amount of friction is usually a factor of the cultural distance between the two populations that rub up against each other.
Islamic culture post-1979 had far more rough edges than the Islam that Europeans and Africans were accustomed to.
We often hear that the vast majority of Muslims are moderate, and that radical Muslims make up only a tiny minority. Forty-four years ago, that might have been the case. Prior to the Iranian Revolution of 1979, most of the Muslim world was fairly moderate.
During most of the twentieth Century, many of the major Muslim powers were ruled by secular strong men such as Ataturk in Turkey. the Shahs in Iran, Nasser in Egypt, Hussein in Iraq, and Assad in Syria. Many of these leaders looked to the West as a model of progress. Western Ideas, Western conveniences, Western clothing, and Western entertainment set the standard—at least in the larger cities.
Meanwhile, the religion of Islam was either suppressed (as in Turkey) or ignored. Kemal Ataturk once referred to Islam as the “theology of an immoral Arab,” entirely unsuited to a “modern progressive state.” And during the 1960s President Nasser of Egypt joked publicly about the impossibility of making women wear the hijab (as demanded by the Muslim Brotherhood). The large audience to which he spoke was quite appreciative of the joke. The hijab, they were sure, was a thing of the past.
The climate of the times is captured in an article by Ali A. Allawi, a former Iraqi cabinet minister. Here’s an excerpt:
I was born into a mildly observant Muslim family in Iraq. At that time, the 1950s, secularism was ascendant among the political, cultural, and intellectual elites of the Middle East. It appeared to be only a matter of time before Islam would lose whatever hold it still had on the Muslim world… To an impressionable child, it was clear that society was decoupling from Islam.
In short, Islam’s moderate era, was the result, in part, of a loss of faith in Islam.
Paradoxically, the perception that the faith was slipping away was also the cause of its renewal. In 1979, the jihadist Islam of the past came roaring back. With the Iranian Revolution and the ascendance to power of the Ayatollah Khomeini, everything changed. Miniskirts were no longer worn in Tehran, and Islam was once again taken very seriously. As Khomeini once remarked, “there are no jokes in Islam.”
Moreover, the Iranian Revolution set off a chain reaction. Like the French Revolution, its ideas and ideals were soon exported to other nations. Hardly any Muslim nation was left untouched by Iran’s overthrow of the Shah. Khomeini had reminded them that Islam is a militant religion—that each Muslim has a duty to wage jihad for the sake of Allah to the best of his abilities.
One of the more unexpected converts to militant Islam was Turkey. In a matter of a dozen years, President Recep Erdogan was able to transform Turkey from the thoroughly secular state created by Ataturk to something more reminiscent of the early Ottoman Empire. Indeed, it’s no secret that Erdogan has long wanted to restore the Caliphate—with himself as Caliph.
One way to accomplish this aim was to invade Europe—not with soldiers, but with migrants. As Muhammad had shown in his conquest of Medina, migration could be employed in the service of jihad.
Erdogan realized this, but Europeans did not. They had fallen in love with the concept of multiculturalism and with the multicultural belief that, beneath the surface differences, all peoples and all cultures are essentially the same. They were sure that once the migrants realized how welcoming Europe was, they would quickly assimilate.
But Erdogan had other ideas. When he spoke to an audience of 20,000 Turks gathered in Cologne, Germany, he told them that “Assimilation is a crime against humanity.” Moreover, he encouraged Turkish families in Europe to have not just three, but five children apiece. Erdogan seems to look at Muslims in Europe, not simply as migrants, but as the advance units of an army.
Although we still cling to the hope that the vast majority of Muslims are moderates, Islam is at heart a radical religion. It’s all about transforming the world. And, almost by definition, moderate people are not out to change the world. The alarming expansion of Islam’s size and influence over the last four decades owes more to those who were inspired by Muhammad’s conquering spirit, than to those “mildly observant” Muslims described by Ali Allawi.
That’s not to say that the Muslim world’s secular leaders were a peaceful lot. Although Egypt’s president Gamal Abdel Nasser was nominally a Muslim, his government was basically secular. But that didn’t prevent him from attacking Israel on several occasions. His motivation, however, had more to do with Arab nationalism than with Islam.
Arab nationalism is no longer the force that it once was, but the appeal of militant Islam is still strong—even stronger as a result of the Taliban’s victory in Afghanistan.
However, Putin’s vicious attack on Ukraine has now distracted us from the Taliban and the boost they have given to the international jihad. Compared to Russia’s army and its possession of nuclear weapons, the threat from jihadists suddenly seems like small potatoes.
But just as Putin was mistaken to underestimate the strength of Ukrainian resistance, we would be mistaken to underestimate the appeal and the persistence of jihad.
It would also be a mistake to expect the forces of jihad to arrive at our borders in the same way that Putin’s army arrived on the borders of Ukraine—with 200,000 troops backed by tanks, heavy artillery, fighter jets and long-range missiles.
Stealth jihadists are already inside the borders of all Western countries, and they are using Erdogan’s methods, not Putin’s. They’re taking advantage of our romance with diversity, shaming us for our “Islamophobia,” bribing our universities to present Islam in a positive light, and demanding increased levels of Muslim migration. Meanwhile, as Joe Biden promised, Muslims are now working at every level of his delusional administration.
We have every reason to be alarmed by Putin’s brutal and reckless tactics, but we can’t afford to forget that in radical Islam we face an equally determined and ruthless enemy.
Audio: ‘Christian Persecution Is Getting Worse. Is Islam the Problem?’
Raymond Ibrahim, a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center, was recently interviewed on the podcast, Shoulder to Shoulder, with Rabbi Pesach and Pastor Doug. The hour long program can be listened to here. Its description follows:
Recent years have seen a drastic increase in the persecution of Christians all over the world. According to recent reports, 2021 was the worst year on record. Almost all of the most dangerous places for Christians today are Muslim countries. Raymond Ibrahim is an author, historian, and journalist who has written extensively about these issues. In this conversation, Raymond goes into the history and theology of Islam and places the current atrocities in historical context.
Yet the New York Times continues to describe the Saudi monarchy, the principal financier and sponsor of Islamic fundamentalist groups throughout the world, as “a partner in combating terrorism.”
Although the bill nowhere names Saudi Arabia, the Saudi government has threatened massive retaliation, including by moving $750 billion in assets out of the country before they can be seized in American legal proceedings. This reaction alone confirms the monarchy’s guilt.
Inside Qatar’s ‘Multimillion-Dollar Plan’ To Mainstream Anti-Israel Journalists
Report exposes anti-Semitic, anti-Israel postings from Qatar-Northwestern program
The Qatari government and Northwestern University are "training a new generation of journalists who will legitimize anti-Semitic, anti-Israel, and anti-American positions," according to a report by a watchdog group.
"Qatar's Multimillion-Dollar Plan to Influence American Media," a report authored by Canary Mission, a watchdog group that documents anti-Semitism on U.S. college campuses, focuses on administrators, professors, lecturers, graduates, and students at Northwestern's satellite campus (NU-Q) in Doha, Qatar's capital, who were found to have made at least 750 "anti-Semitic, anti-Israel, and anti-American" social media postings. This number includes posts endorsing terrorism, touting boycotts of Israel, referring to pro-Israel Jews as "Zionist pigs," and praising Nazi leader Adolf Hitler.
Of the 37 individuals highlighted in the report, 73 percent expressed support for terrorism, 81 percent demonized Israel and Jews, 27 percent posted anti-Semitic content, and 54 percent backed the anti-Semitic Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement (BDS), which wages economic warfare on the Jewish state.
"The NU-Q learning experience consists of a fully immersive environment that includes a heavily biased curriculum and a host of lecturers who hold antisemitic, anti-Israel, and anti-American views," according to the report.
NU-Q is completely funded up to $50 million annually by Qatar through two state-controlled organizations: the Qatar Foundation and the Al Jazeera Media Network, both of which have come under fire for attempting to wage influenceoperations in the United States and mainstream anti-Israel and anti-Semitic views. The program lecturers include in-house professors as well as Al Jazeera reporters, producers, and management. Qatar has long been accused of funding U.S. academic institutions to build an influence network across the United States. Programs funded by the Qatari government have come under scrutiny for their anti-Israel bent and focus on demonizing the pro-Israel community.
"Whether students begin with anti-Western views or not, too many emerge from their studies at NU-Q with an anti-Israel and anti-American mindset," Canary Mission said in a statement on its findings. "When they subsequently find positions in mainstream media, they come equipped with both the motivation and ability to influence public opinion."
The watchdog group further says in the report that Northwestern's campus in Doha "trains students to legitimize anti-Semitic, anti-Israel, and anti-American narratives in Western media." Once completing the program, students are pushed into mainstream media jobs where they can promote these views, according to the report.
One professor highlighted in the report, Sami Hermez, appeared to support Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah in a 2007 posting at the Electronic Intifada website, which is known for its anti-Israel and anti-Zionist views.
"Sayed Hassan Nasrallah, general secretary of Hezbollah, is the leader of a movement claiming to fight for the right of self-determination, in the same way that Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela were leaders of movements that claimed similar ends," Hermez wrote. He is also affiliated with the BDS movement, according to Canary Mission’s findings.
Another professor, Ibrahim Abusharif, was a founder of the Quranic Literacy Institute, a nonprofit that was alleged to be acting as a "money-laundering clearing house" for the Hamas terror group. More than $1 million of the organization’s assets were seized in 2004 after it was found guilty of funding a Hamas strike that killed an American teenager in the West Bank, according to reports from the time.
Current students and graduates of the program also were found to hold extreme anti-Israel views.
Alaa Lami, whom the report cites as a current student studying journalism at the Doha campus and slated to graduate in 2024, said in a 2021 tweet, "I called ppl who said ‘innocent israelis shouldnt die' zionist pigs on a uni group."
Another current student, Lujain Assaf, described Israel as "a colonizer and oppressor" and said that "Zionism is a violent racist ideology" in a 2020 tweet cited in the report.
Nawal Aqeel, who Canary Mission says graduated from the Northwestern-Qatar campus site, tweeted in 2014, "I wish Hitler was alive so he could exterminate the existence of Jews attacking the beautiful land of Gaza!"
Northwestern did not respond to a request for comment on the report and its findings.
THE MUSLIM PROFIT MOHAMMED WAS A PEDOPHILE WITH NUMEROUS CHILD BRIDES!
THE KORAN
BIBLE OF THE MUSLIM TERRORIST:
“The Wahhabis finance thousands of madrassahs throughout the world where young boys are brainwashed into becoming fanatical foot-soldiers for the petrodollar-flush Saudis and other emirs of the Persian Gulf.” AMIL IMANI
Koran 2:191 "s lay the unbelievers wherever you find them" Koran 3:21 "Muslims must not take the infidels as friends" Koran 5:33 "Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticize Islam" Koran 8:12 "Terrorize and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the Koran" Koran 8:60 " Muslims must muster all weapons to terrorize the infidels" Koran 8:65 "The unbelievers are stupid, urge all Muslims to fight them" Koran 9:5 "When the opportunity arises, kill the infidels wherever you find them" Koran 9:123 "Make war on the infidels living in your neighborhood" Koran 22:19 "Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron rods, boiling water, melt their skin and bellies" Koran 47:4 "Do not hanker for peace with the infidels, behead them when you catch them".
Imam Who Defended Honor Killings and Sex Slavery to Speak On Campus About Challenges of Being Muslim
The great thing about being an Islamist in the Ms. Marvel era is that no matter what awful things they catch you saying, there will be no consequences. After some initial awkwardness, everyone will back away for a few months or a year... and then the party is back on.
When Bernie Sanders appeared with Imam Omar Suleiman, the Imam's hateful views became an issue and the Sanders campaign temporarily backed away. These days you'll find virtually no mention of it. Google is helpfully suppressing search results on the subject and so there's a magical clean slate.
And now Suleiman's going to be speaking at Oakland University on the challenge of being a Muslim in America. It's tough when they won't let you kill your daughters.
"Sisters, you know what happens with a really jealous Dad? He kills you and he kills the guy," a smiling Imam Suleiman told Muslim female college students at an Islamist youth event. "Even if they don't have a man who's going to be a real man, Allah has more than any man."
And won't let you take sex slaves.
"Society's welfare always takes precedence over the individual's welfare," Imam Suleiman had said, when discussing concubines and sex slaves. "It supersedes the outrage of a woman - the very real possibility that a woman in that situation had that option not been there - would have most likely been put in a situation of prostitution."
And then, making it clear that he was talking about sex slavery of the ISIS variety, he discussed a situation where “a prisoner of war was to come in, if a woman was to come in that situation”.
In Islam, girls and women are captured as “prisoners of war” and raped by Muslim men. As the many Yazidi girls and women raped by ISIS were. As were American women like Kayla Mueller.
Or chop off hands.
"The punishment for theft," Imam Omar Suleiman said at a Sharia Council Panel, "which would be the cutting off of the hand, that's not just any theft, Allah wants to protect the life of the one who had stolen... but a skilled thief."
Also there's the support for killing Jews.
Earlier in the conflict, Omar had tweeted, “God willing on this blessed night as the 3rd Intifada begins, the beginning of the end of Zionism is here. May Allah help us overcome this monster, protect the innocent of the world, and accept the murdered as martyrs. ameen #48kMarch #3rdIntifada.”
He later tweeted, “The people of #Gaza made us proud. You refused to let terror break you and we refuse to let Zionist media silence you.”
I'm not sure what the challenge is honestly.
Islamists like Omar can spew the worst hateful filth and then be embraced by leftists and invited to college campuses.
Viral Palestinian Wedding Features Calls for Increased Russian Attacks on Ukraine, Taking of Their Women
In a video clip that has garnered well over half a million views within a day, a famed Palestinian wedding performer leads the crowd with a song calling for increased attacks on Ukraine and the banishment of its citizens in order for Palestinian men to wed the remaining Ukrainian women. It also called for China to invade Taiwan to hit back at the U.S.
The viral clip of a wedding performance by popular Palestinian singer Mohammed Arani, whose official Facebook page has over 112,000 followers, shows Palestinian participants celebrating to the tune of calls for broadening the current bloody conflict in Ukraine, which has already cost the lives of thousands.
Arani is joined by fellow singer Suhaib Al-Jamma’ini, whose official Facebook page has nearly 75,000 followers.
The song specifically addresses Russian President Vladimir Putin, urging him to intensify his war on Ukraine which would lead to the availability of Ukrainian women for Palestinian men to wed.
“Harden your heart, O Putin,” Arani sings. “Increase your attacks.”
“Banish them to Palestine, and we will marry Ukrainian women,” it continues.
The next part urges authoritarian China to seize its democratic neighbor Taiwan in order to defeat the Israel-supporting United States.
“Also, we say to China: invade Taiwan! Also, we say to China: Why don’t you invade Taiwan?” he sings.
“This way we will smash the nose of the Americans — who make the [Israeli] airplanes,” the song continues.
Arani is then seen repeating the chorus which called for President Vladimir Putin to escalate attacks on Ukraine as well as the banishing of Ukrainian women to Palestine for the purposes of being married off to local men.
Many took to Twitter to express outrage over the clip, which was posted on various Palestinian sources online earlier this month.
Dr. Nervana Mahmoud, a regional observer and independent commentator on Middle East issues, called it “absolutely sick fascism and misogyny.”
“This is who the left adore,” wrote political commentator Sophie Corcoran.
“Heartwarming, from the usual suspects,” human rights lawyer and national security analyst Irina Tsukerman wrote mockingly.
“Here to my progressive friends enjoy true palestinian culture,” wrote commentator Eli Dror.
“It almost feels like they want to lose all the sympathies the world still has for them,” one Twitter user wrote.
“This is disturbing on so many levels….,” wrote another.
Last week, model Gigi Hadid was slammed for comparing victims in Ukraine to people who live in Palestinian territories.
Activist and influencer Elizabeth Savetsky stated she is “absolutely appalled” over Hadid’s comparison, elaborating on reasons the matter is incomparable.
Israeli actress and author Noa Tishby also reacted to Hadid’s comments, stating that the model is “hijacking the Russian invasion of Ukraine to promote propaganda about Israel.”
“We’re seeing, yet again, celebrities and social media influencers co-opting a global tragedy in order to spread lies about Israel,” Tishby said. “Ukraine is not Palestine, and Israel is not Russia. So, no, Gigi, it’s not the same.”
In January, a report revealed the Biden administration was being sued for refusing to submit internal documents that could show it violated a law barring the federal government from sending money to the Palestinian government until it stops its so-called “pay-for-slay” scheme paying terrorists and their families.
No comments:
Post a Comment