Likewise, the Biden-Harris plan for national immigration policy — which seeks to drive up legal and illegal immigration levels to their highest levels in decades — offers a flooded labor market with low wages for U.S. workers and increased bargaining power for big business that has long been supported by Wall Street. JOHN BINDER
GLOBALISTS’ DEMOCRAT PARTY FOR WIDER OPEN BORDERS TO KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED.
https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/11/frontpage-hidden-agenda-of-pueblo-sin.html
Demonstrably and irrefutably the Democrat Party became the party whose principle objective is to thoroughly transform the nature of the American electorate by means of open borders and the mass, unchecked importation of illiterate third world peasants who will vote in overwhelming numbers for Democrats and their La Raza welfare state. FRONTPAGE MAG
CRONY CAPITALISM AND THEIR CRONY KLEPTOCRACY
THE DEMOCRAT PARTY OF BRIBES SUCKERS.. destroying America as fast as they destroyed America’s borders.
https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2022/04/the-democrat-party-of-corruption-and.html
American Corporate Community and its major players — BlackRock (JOE BIDEN’S BIGGEST BRIBSTER), Goldman Sachs, Bridgewater, Google, Microsoft, Intel, Twitter, and Musk — and, of course, Gates — that draws them to a plutocracy that would never hesitate to betray America for a financial advantage or an opportunity to be a part of a global powerhouse oligarchy complicit with and colluding with malefactor government tyrannies. (avarice, cupidity, and rapaciousness) JOHN DALE DUNN
“Our entire crony capitalist system, Democrat and Republican alike, has become a kleptocracy approaching par with third-world hell-holes. This is the way a great country is raided by its elite.” ---- Karen McQuillan
Chris Hedges | Corporate DEATH Forces
Chris Hedges | America's MAFIA State
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DwWUPqibsVQ
VIDEOS
The voices inside his Earpiece
Back To The Basement
Democrats: We’ll Keep Border Barrier If Republicans OK More Legal Migration
Democrats and their business-backed allies are hinting they want the Republicans to okay more legal migration in exchange for keeping border barriers against illegal migration.
“I don’t think there’s any incentive for the Republicans to deal,” amid Democratic threats to lift the Title 42 border barrier against migration, responded Jessica Vaughan, the policy studies director at the Center for Immigration Studies.
“The Republicans know enough to insist on a clean extension of Title 42, not one encumbered with the Democrats’ wish list items,” she said, adding:
The Democrats might think that they could get something in exchange for allowing a Title 42 extension. But I think it would be a miscalculation. I don’t think it’s a good look for them to be trying to put a price on Title 42 extension when most of the public wants it extended. That would be seen as obstructing or complicating the continuation of Title 42.
Some Democratic supporters indicate they have little leverage. “Democrats are terrified that ending Title 42 enforcement will produce an all-out border crisis just in time for the midterm elections,” Democratic strategist William Galston wrote in the April 19 Wall Street Journal.
“The deadline for the lifting of Title 42 is a month away [May 23] — but the Biden administration is under enormous pressure to stall the timeline amid a Democratic mutiny,” TheHill.com reported on April 22.
Yet some Republicans are signaling they will work with Democrats to pass a law that would convert the Title 42 illegal inflow into more of the legal immigration that benefits business groups and donors at the expense of ordinary voters:
Still, the GOP hints about agreeing to a deal may only be rhetorical concessions to donors and Democrats and are not intended to result in any deal.
The Democratic hints are thrown out whenever they are asked about their plan to open the borders in May by lifting the Title 42 border barrier against epidemics.
“Immigration in our country is broken,” Jennifer Psaki said on April 20 when she was asked about the administration’s plan to remove the Title 42 barrier. She continued:
There are a range of ideas out there in Congress — Democrats, Republicans, others — some who support a delay of Title 42 implementation, some who strongly oppose it. And there are a range of other ideas of reforming our immigration system. This would all require congressional action. We’re happy to have that conversation with them.
“A long-term solution can only come from comprehensive legislation that brings lasting reform to a fundamentally broken system,” border chief Alejandro Mayorkas said on April 1 as he announced that the last elements of the Title 42 barrier would be removed by May 23.
“On the president’s first day in office, he sent an immigration bill to Congress that invests in smart solutions, effectively manages the border, and addresses the root causes of migration,” the White House told Axios for an April 6 article on Title 42. “Those that are concerned about [the U.S.] immigration system … should pass it.”
“The president proposed comprehensive immigration reform [on] his first day in office,” Biden’s chief of staff Ron Klain said on April 7. “I haven’t seen what the Republican plan is other than to stall it.”
Biden’s January 2021 bill would spike Wall Street values by massively raising the inflow of foreigners into Americans’ jobs, careers, schools, and homes.
“Our immigration system is broken and it’s badly broken and it’s been that way for decades,” Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) said on April 5. “What we need to do is finally sit down together and say, what is the orderly way to do it?”
The same open borders or more legal-migration message is being pushed by business-backed groups that lobby for more foreign consumers, renters, and workers.
“Political necessity requires Democrats to get off the immigration dime,” immigration advocate Ali Noorani wrote at TheDailyBeast.com:
Right-wing Republicans who seek a return to the [Donald] Trump/[Stephen] Miller approach have filled the vacuum, leading a growing number of Democrats and reform-minded Republicans to call for Title 42 to remain in place.
…
[Biden needs] to engage Congress in a process that advances a first tranche of sustainable reforms needed to secure our borders and modernize our immigration system. While the time to advance reforms this year is limited, Congress is not starting from scratch.
“Ending Title 42 at the border is the right thing to do, but it is not enough,” said an April 6 post by Laura Collins, a pro-migration advocate at the George W. Bush Presidential Center. “Congress must seriously consider nimble legislative solutions to improve border security and the legal immigration system,” she added.
Vaughan is skeptical that Democrats and businesses can force the GOP to make a deal before the election.
If Democrats try to demand a price for protecting the public, “I don’t think that that would go over well with the public,” she said.
Besides, the GOP can expect gains from any debate in which the TV cameras are showing Biden’s migration into Americans’ jobs and towns, she said. “It gives the Republicans the opportunity to say ‘Look, Title 42 is a temporary tool, and what we really want is for you to enforce the actual immigration laws to disrupt this inflow,'” Vaughan said.
Some Republicans do want a deal that helps businesses, especially by providing more foreign graduates to replace U.S. graduates. “Two years ago, we had two bills on the floor that came very, very close,” Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) told Durbin and several other Senators on March 15. He continued:
We had a historic number of Republicans voting for a path to citizenship for the DACA population. We almost got where we needed to be on addressing some of the border security issues. Now we can, I think, dust that off and come up with something productive. I, for one, would like to this to be the Congress where we address the DACA population, that we also address some of these guest worker programs, and Green Card issues, which, to me, I learned firsthand [when] I got exposed to the H-1B process in my [prior] job at PriceWaterhouse.
I’ve tried to tell anyone who thinks that we just need to find more [American] computer scientists, more data analysts, more people with advanced degrees from the U.S. population, that they need to wake up and recognize that if we want our economy to continue to grow, if we want to continue to build on this great economy, that we’ve got to look to legal immigration as a critical part of fulfilling our workforce needs and really growing our innovation economy.
Republicans will resist the business pressure before the November election, Vaughan predicted:
Democrats might try to do something on asylum or refugees or some some way to expand or facilitate making a lot of these border projects legal, and that way they won’t mind giving in on Title 42 because they’ve got another way to [legally] let people in. But Republicans won’t fall for that. Republicans have been very clear that they want the asylum system tightened, not loosened, and [they are] not supportive of a major increase in refugees or humanitarian programs.
There’s no polling evidence that GOP voters and swing voters want legislation to accelerate the inflow of legal immigrants into Americans’ jobs, homes, and communities.
And some of the Republicans who say they want a deal are also hinting that the Title 42 issue is a political disaster for Democrats:
Extraction Migration
Since at least 1990, the D.C. establishment has extracted tens of millions of migrants and visa workers from poor countries to serve as legal or illegal workers, temporary workers, consumers, and renters for various U.S. investors and CEOs.
This economic strategy of Extraction Migration has no stopping point. It is brutal to ordinary Americans because it cuts their career opportunities, shrinks their salaries and wages, raises their housing costs, and has shoved at least ten million American men out of the labor force.
Extraction migration also distorts the economy and curbs Americans’ productivity, partly because it allows employers to use stoop labor instead of machines. Migration also reduces voters’ political clout, undermines employees’ workplace rights, and widens the regional wealth gaps between the Democrats’ coastal states and the Republicans’ Heartland and southern states.
An economy built on extraction migration also alienates young people and radicalizes Americans’ democratic, compromise-promoting civic culture because it allows wealthy elites to ignore despairing Americans at the bottom of society.
The policy is hidden behind a wide variety of excuses and explanations, such as the claim that the U.S. is a “Nation of Immigrants” or that Americans have a duty to accept foreign refugees. But the economic strategy also kills many migrants, exploits poor people, splits foreign families, and extracts wealth from the poor home countries.
The economic policy is backed by progressives who wish to transform the U.S. from a society governed by European-origin civic culture into a progressive-led empire of competing identity groups. “We’re trying to become the first multiracial, multi-ethnic superpower in the world,” Rep. Rohit Khanna (D-CA), told the New York Times on March 21. “It will be an extraordinary achievement … we will ultimately triumph,” he insisted.
Not surprisingly, the wealth-shifting extraction migration policy is very unpopular, according to a wide variety of polls. The polls show deep and broad public opposition to labor migration and the inflow of temporary contract workers into jobs sought by young U.S. graduates.
The opposition is growing, anti-establishment, multiracial, cross-sex, non-racist, class-based, bipartisan, rational, persistent, and recognizes the solidarity that Americans owe to one another.
Mayorkas Pushes Democrats to OK Removal of Title 42 Border Barrier
The nation’s pro-migrant border chief is rebuking the many Democratic legislators who say the Title 42 barrier should be kept until officials have “a plan” to deal with the expected wave of ambitious and desperate migrants.
“The assertion that we do not have plans is an assertion that is not grounded in fact,” homeland secretary Alejandro Mayorkas told a pro-migration reporter at CBS News.
Numerous legislators and media outlets have talked about the need for a plan to deal with the huge inflow expected once Mayorkas stops enforcing the Title 42 anti-disease barrier at the border. But Mayorkas’s plan has been public for weeks, and, yet, politicians and journalists have been reluctant to describe the very unpopular contents of his plan.
Mayorkas sketched out his strategy to minimize the TV coverage of the arriving migration by quickly legalizing them and then transporting them to Americans’ jobs via a government-funded catch and release network:
We have been planning for months to address increases in migration … proof of that is the fact that we’ve deployed additional resources to the border in anticipation of an end to Title 42. The surging of personnel, transportation, medical resources, the development of additional facilities to support border operations. These plans have been in the works for months. And so, we do indeed have plans and I can assure the American people and their representatives that we do indeed.
The public pushback by the Cuban-born border chief comes amid a nationwide rejection of his plans to open the borders to anyone around the world who says they need asylum protection from foreign governments, unverifiable spousal abuse, routine poverty, and ordinary crime. Since January 2021, Mayorkas and his allies have allowed roughly 1 million economic migrants over the southern border — without even trying to detain them until their court cases are heard, as required by law.
President Joe Biden has not resolved the internal White House debate. His absence ensures a continued fight between deputies who favor more immigration and deputies who are trying to preserve Democratic political clout in Congress.
Many Democrats are trying to get others from their party to preserve the Title 42 barrier because they fear Mayorkas’s pro-migrant plan will destroy the Democrats’ political base on Capitol Hill.
“Democrats are terrified that ending Title 42 enforcement will produce an all-out border crisis just in time for the midterm elections,” Democratic strategist William Galston wrote in the April 19 Wall Street Journal.
CNN reported on April 23:
The Democratic rebellion against President Joe Biden’s plans to lift pandemic-era border restrictions is growing, as candidates in marquee races from Nevada to New Hampshire break with the administration and Republicans turn immigration into a centerpiece of their midterm election messaging.
The Biden administration is set to roll back next month the public health authority known as Title 42, which was first invoked by then-President Donald Trump. The measure allows border authorities to turn migrants back to Mexico or their home countries because of the public health crisis.
Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas has privately told members of Congress he’s concerned with the Biden administration’s handling of its plans to lift Title 42 on May 23, sources familiar with the conversations tell Axios.
A. Secretary’s Intent.
1 ) Purpose: The purpose of this plan is to describe a proactive approach that humanely prevents and responds to surges in irregular migration across the U.S. [southern border]. This will be done while ensuring that migrants can apply for any form of relief or protection [emphasis added] for which they may be eligible, including asylum, withholding of removal, and protection from removal under the regulations implementing United States obligations under the Convention Against Torture.
In his interview with the Columbian-born CBS reporter, Camilo Montoya-Galvez, Mayorkas was eager to talk about the existence of the plan, but not the details of how he and his business allies will use the plan to move many — perhaps millions — of migrants into Americans’ jobs, housing, schools, and communities.
Mayorkas, who still identifies as an immigrant, said:
We are confident that we can implement our plans when they are needed. And we are also very aware of the fact, Camilo, that we are planning for different scenarios. And certain of those scenarios present significant challenges for us. There is a fundamental point, Camilo, that is so important to communicate every single time that we speak of these challenges, and that is that we are operating within the confines of a system that is entirely broken, and that is long overdue for legislative fix.
Mayorkas is a pro-migration zealot who is part of the White House’s West Coast Faction that favors the mass migration of blue-collar and white-collar consumers, renters, and workers.
He has repeatedly shown that he favors foreign immigrants and U.S. investors over the many Americans whose wages, housing, and community resources will be damaged by the mass inflow of migrant consumers, renters, and workers.
Mayorkas rarely appears in public and dodges difficult issues by instead appearing at scripted meetings with legislators or picked pro-migration reporters hired by pro-migration corporations.
Extraction Migration
Since at least 1990, the D.C. establishment has extracted tens of millions of migrants and visa workers from poor countries to serve as legal or illegal workers, temporary workers, consumers, and renters for various U.S. investors and CEOs.
This economic strategy of Extraction Migration has no stopping point. It is brutal to ordinary Americans because it cuts their career opportunities, shrinks their salaries and wages, raises their housing costs, and has shoved at least ten million American men out of the labor force.
Extraction migration also distorts the economy and curbs Americans’ productivity, partly because it allows employers to use stoop labor instead of machines. Migration also reduces voters’ political clout, undermines employees’ workplace rights, and widens the regional wealth gaps between the Democrats’ coastal states and the Republicans’ Heartland and southern states.
An economy built on extraction migration also alienates young people and radicalizes Americans’ democratic, compromise-promoting civic culture because it allows wealthy elites to ignore despairing Americans at the bottom of society.
The policy is hidden behind a wide variety of excuses and explanations, such as the claim that the U.S. is a “Nation of Immigrants” or that Americans have a duty to accept foreign refugees. But the economic strategy also kills many migrants, exploits poor people, splits foreign families, and extracts wealth from the poor home countries.
The economic policy is backed by progressives who wish to transform the U.S. from a society governed by European-origin civic culture into a progressive-led empire of competing identity groups. “We’re trying to become the first multiracial, multi-ethnic superpower in the world,” Rep. Rohit Khanna (D-CA), told the New York Times on March 21. “It will be an extraordinary achievement … we will ultimately triumph,” he insisted.
Not surprisingly, the wealth-shifting extraction migration policy is very unpopular, according to a wide variety of polls. The polls show deep and broad public opposition to labor migration and the inflow of temporary contract workers into jobs sought by young U.S. graduates.
The opposition is growing, anti-establishment, multiracial, cross-sex, non-racist, class-based, bipartisan, rational, persistent, and recognizes the solidarity that Americans owe to one another.
Watch – Ohio’s J.D. Vance Diagnoses How America’s Leaders Drained Working Class Jobs Overseas at Newsmax Town Hall
Republican Ohio Senate candidate J.D. Vance appeared at a Newsmax town hall meeting Wednesday where he discussed a range of topics, from bringing back American jobs to protecting children’s innocence in the classroom.
On the issue of American jobs, a former Air Force veteran asked Vance how he would address struggling middle-class Americans who have become dependent on government welfare in the face of their jobs being shipped overseas.
“People prosper when they have good jobs that support families, not when they just sit at home and get a check from the government,” said Vance. “What happened to Dayton and what happened to Toledo and Middletown, and so many states, is that our leaders decided we don’t need to make stuff here anymore.”
“The steel that we rely on in our buildings, the computer chips that are in everything now, from appliances to phones to cars, the pharmaceuticals that our kids take, all of this stuff is now mainly made overseas by people who don’t like us,” he added. “What happened is a lot of middle-class communities lost the good jobs that support families.”
Vance cited former President Trump’s trade tariffs as an example of combating this epidemic.
“You’re never gonna write enough checks to make up for the fact that we used to be a proud country that made stuff,” he concluded.
In another exchange, with a high school student, Vance explained why he stands above other candidates in the already crowded primary.
“I don’t do talking points and I don’t do slogans,” Vance said.
Vance noted the town hall was originally supposed to be a debate, but no other candidates showed up.
Perhaps Vance’s strongest moment of the town hall came when he addressed the so-called “Don’t Say Gay” bill being floated in Ohio, which essentially bars teachers from discussing gender or sexuality with children grades K-3.
“I think the media has called this thing a ‘Don’t Say Gay’ bill,” Vance asserted. “I think it’s one of the great successes in the media: creating something when there wasn’t anything before. The actual text of the Florida legislation that people call ‘Don’t Say Gay,’ what it says is you should not be able to talk about sexuality and gender identity with children who are K-3.
“You’re talking about five, six, seven, eight-year-old kids. That seems like a pretty good idea,” Vance added, prompting applause from the audience.
J.D. Vance received a huge bump last week when former President Donald Trump endorsed his candidacy, hailing him as “our best chance for victory in what could be a very tough race.”
“The Democrats will be spending many millions of dollars, but the good news is that they have a defective candidate who ran for President and garnered exactly zero percent in the polls. The bottom line is, we must have a Republican victory in Ohio,” Trump said.
No comments:
Post a Comment