Wednesday, May 4, 2022

NAFTA JOE BIDEN - I'M WORKING WITH MY BILLIONAIRE DONOR CRONIES MARK ZUCKERBERG AND JEFF BEZOS TO KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED - IS IT WORKING? GOT ANOTHER TEN MILLION ILLEGALS HEADED TO WHAT WAS THE BORDER NOW!

 

LAYOFFS Imminent (Housing Market is NOT PREPARED)'




Immigration Is No Fix for Inflation
Analysis shows cutting wages by increasing foreign workers
wouldn't significantly reduce prices and would harm the poor
Washington, D.C. (May 4, 2022) – The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other lobbying groups have called for increases in immigration to reduce wages and control inflation. A new analysis by the Center for Immigration Studies estimates that even substantially reducing wages for all less-educated workers, or in the occupations where they are concentrated, would have a negligible impact on consumer prices because such workers account for only a modest share of the GDP.

“It is simply not possible to control inflation by reducing the wages of the less-educated because such workers earn so little to begin with,” said the report’s lead author, CIS Director of Research Steven Camarota. “Bringing in more foreign workers to lower the wages of workers who don’t earn much in the first place also seems grossly unfair.”

Among the findings:
  • Reflecting their relatively modest average compensation, all less-educated workers (those without a bachelor’s degree) account for only 25 percent of GDP. More-educated workers and capital account for the other 75 percent of the economy.
  • Therefore, even a substantial reduction of 10 percent in the wages of all less-educated workers would likely reduce consumer prices by only an estimated 2.5 percent, assuming all of the savings were passed on to consumers and not retained as higher profits by businesses.
  • It may be possible to reduce wages more by dramatically increasing the number of foreign workers in a few specific sectors of the economy. But individual lower-paid occupations account for only a tiny share of GDP. For example, construction workers are only 2.2 percent of GDP, cleaning and maintenance 1 percent, food service only 1.1 percent, and healthcare support just 0.9 percent.
  • Prior to Covid-19, workers have generally seen their wages decline or grow very little for more than two decades, particularly those without a bachelor’s degree. Reducing their wages by admitting more immigrants can be seen as unfair and unwise.
  • More than one in seven less-educated workers are currently eligible to receive cash payments from the Earned Income Tax Credit and Additional Child Tax Credit, the nation’s largest cash assistance programs for low-wage workers. Reducing the wages of such workers would undo efforts to help low-income workers.
  • Nearly two-thirds of all children in poverty are dependent on a worker who does not have a bachelor’s degree. Using immigration to reduce wages for less-educated workers has significant negative implications for American’s poorest children.
Visit Website



VIDEO OF EVENTS THAT LED TO TRUMP'S PLAN BEING BROUGHT DOWN!

Failure Is Their ONLY Option


THIS VIDEO SHOWS 'CREDIT CARD' BIDEN'S MANSION THAT THE BANKSTERS BOUGHT OL' JOE THE BRIBES SUCKER.

VIDEO:

They Get Away With EVERYTHING

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsFHC1CS9Dg


DRUGGIE WILMINGTON   -  PEOPLE DIE ON THE STREETS 

Here's how TERRIBLE Joe Biden's home town of Wilmington, Delaware looks these days.





JOE BIDEN: AMERICA’S DRUG DEALER!

 https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2022/05/joe-biden-americas-drug-dealer-but-then.html

From April 2020 to April 2021, more than 100,000 Americans died from drug overdoses, according to data from the National Center for Health Statistics. An overwhelming majority of those deaths came from opioids, and fentanyl smuggling has surged at the southern border since the start of Joe Biden's presidency. Joseph Simonson and Collin Anderson 

https://www.breitbart.com/border/2022/04/19/border-town-usa-migrants-busted-in-michigan-with-mexican-cartels-20k-fentanyl-pills/


Border Town USA: Migrants Busted in Michigan with Mexican Cartel’s 20K Fentanyl Pills

 https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2022/04/joe-bidens-sabotage-of-homeland_19.html

JOE BIDEN'S SABOTAGE OF HOMELAND SECURITY - Illegal immigration is also the ways and means by which illegal drugs enter the United States. Last year, 100,000 Americans, most of them young, died of overdoses, with two-thirds of these Americans succumbing to fentanyl that is produced in China and comes through Mexico. PATRICK BUCHANAN


The only reason that Biden became president is because Democrat campaign workers, posing as journalists, buried a truthful story about the Biden family corruption that most of them knew was true. They still intentionally hide the truth of the depth and breadth of the corruption from the public because they know Biden's and other Democrats’ poll numbers would be much worse if the public knew the truth. 

THE BIDEN CRIME MAFIA   -  50 YEARS OF BRIBES

A 'corrupt family occupies the White House'




May The Truth Be With You



A FEW HUNDRED REASONS WHY LAWYER-POLITICIANS SHOULD BE BANNED FROM SEEKING ELECTIVE OFFICE:

MOST ARE SOCIOPATHS AND BRIBES SUCKING GAMERS OF THE LAW ALL ARE DESPERATE PARASITES EAGER TO GET AT THE MONEY NO MATTER ANYTHING!

https://ca-judicial-performance-hoax.blogspot.com/2022/04/should-lawyers-be-banned-from-elective.html

THE BIDEN CRIME MAFIA   -  50 YEARS OF BRIBES

A 'corrupt family occupies the White House'



Schweizer: Independent Counsel Needed to Investigate Hunter Biden

Joe Biden: Let’s Beat Russia by Importing Russians for Americans’ Careers

A Russian girl dressed in her graduation gown poses for photographs at Red Square in Moscow on July 10, 2018, on the eve of the Russia 2018 World Cup semi-final football match between between Croatia and England. (Photo by MANAN VATSYAYANA / AFP) (Photo credit should read MANAN VATSYAYANA/AFP via …
MANAN VATSYAYANA/AFP via Getty
11:11

Indebted U.S. college graduates would help the war against Russia by sharing their careers with imported Russian graduates, according to a funding request sent to Congress by President Joe Biden.

The funding request “would amend section 203(b)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act to eliminate the requirement that Russian STEM professionals have an employer sponsor in the United States before applying for an employment-based [green card] visa,” says the April 28 the funding request.

The bill would “attract and retain Russian STEM talent and undercut Russia’s innovative potential, benefitting U.S. national security,” the document says.

The message to U.S. professionals is that “Uncle Sam wants YOU to suffer wage depression … to ensure that a larger portion of Ukraine is under the government of Kyiv but not Moscow,” responded Mark Krikorian, director of the Center for Immigration Studies.

“It’s not a vital U.S. interest whether some districts of eastern Ukraine are to be run from Moscow or Kyiv,” said Krikorian. The bloody war over districts in Eastern Ukraine, such as the Luhansk Oblast, “is the kind of ugly European power politics that our Founding Fathers wanted to keep us out,” he added.

GOP leaders will try to exclude the corporate giveaway from the spending bill, one Hill source told Breitbart News.

The Democratic majority can pass “an expensive aid package where we’re going to send defense and humanitarian assistance to Ukraine … or even to the neighboring European nations to help them absorb refugees in their country,” the source said. “But we [Republicans] will not be including immigration provisions.”

The spending request rule would allow Fortune 500 executives to hire hundreds of thousands of desperate Russian graduates for the jobs and careers that are needed by tens of millions of American graduates.

Those U.S. graduates are already being forced to compete for jobs and decent wages against the little-recognized population of roughly 1.5 million college-trained contract workers extracted from India, China, and other poor countries.

The spending request hides the breadth of foreign graduates sought by the new extraction policy under a long list of military-style technologies:

Advanced Computing, Advanced Engineering Materials, Advanced Gas Turbine Engine Technologies, Advanced Manufacturing, Advanced and Networked Sensing and Signature Management, Advanced Nuclear Energy Technologies, Advanced Particle Detector Instrumentation Technologies, Artificial Intelligence, Autonomous Systems and Robotics, Biotechnologies, Communication and Networking Technologies, Cybersecurity, Directed Energy, Financial Technologies, Human-Machine Interfaces, Hypersonics, Advanced Missile Propulsion Technologies, Networked Sensors and Sensing, Quantum Information Technologies, Renewable Energy Generation and Storage, Semiconductors and Microelectronics, Space Technologies and Systems …

But the language says the invite is for Russians who “have earned a master’s or doctoral degree in the United States or an equivalent foreign degree in a field involving science, technology, engineering, or mathematics [STEM].”

But the federal definition of “STEM” is extremely broad. The definition is also being expanded to the universities which dangle U.S. work permits to help recruit fee-paying foreign students.

The federal definition for STEM includes dairy science, horticultural science, soil microbiology, veterinary anatomy, environmental studies, forestry, media, computer programming, data processing, Web Page design, Computer Support Specialist, Education/Instructional Technology, Architectural Engineering, HVAC technicians, environmental technicians, manufacturing technician, quality control technician, solar energy technician, biology,  animal behavior, plant genetics, exercise physiology, ecology, statistics, financial mathematics, behavioral sciences, climate science, financial analytics, chemistry, paleontology, child psychology, archeology, medical science, environmental health, and the catch-all title of “business statistics.”

“If [the plan] were confined to PhDs in STEM fields, the numbers would be much lower,” Krikorian said:

The tell is that these proposals are never limited to PhDs. They always include master’s degree holders. Frankly, I have a master’s degree and I shouldn’t be getting any special immigration consideration from any foreign country and neither should master’s degree holders abroad …  This kind of [masters degree] proposal always metastasizes into a means of importing cheap labor to undermine Americans.”

A 2017 article in Forbes.com calculated that Russia had 561,000 STEM graduates.

As usual, the scale of the program is unrecognized by U.S. reporters who do not recognize the federal government’s long-standing strategy of fuelling economic growth with extraction migration from poor countries.

For example, Bloomberg.com reported the extraction proposal shows the U.S. is “enticing experts in semiconductors, cybersecurity, space,” even as it also noted that “A spokesman for the National Security Council confirmed that the effort is meant to weaken Putin’s high-tech resources in the near term and undercut Russia’s innovation base over the long run — as well as benefit the U.S. economy and national security.”

“Many reporters are not going to dig into this — they’re just going to transcribe what they think is the right point of view,” said Krikorian.

Few media outlets have noticed the many millions of white-collar jobs have been transferred to legal and illegal migrants and contract workers. The jobs were transferred to the millions of H-1B, L-1, J-1, TN, or B-1/B-2 visa workers that have been imported and hired by Fortune 500 companies and their many subcontractors, or to the millions of Optional Practical Training graduates produced by U.S. universities.

That foreign inflow has pushed myriad U.S. technology professionals out of well-paying careers. A 2021 study by the Census Bureau reported:

The vast majority (62%) of college-educated workers who majored in a STEM [science, technology, engineering and math] field were employed in non-STEM fields such as non-STEM management, law, education, social work, accounting or counseling. In addition, 10% of STEM college graduates worked in STEM-related occupations such as health care.

The path to STEM jobs for non-STEM majors was narrow. Only a few STEM-related majors (7%) and non-STEM majors (6%) ultimately ended up in STEM occupations.

This year, House Democrats have voted to accelerate this white-collar outsourcing via a draft bill marketed as a bill to counter China’s government-backed companies. However, GOP leaders, including Sen. Todd Young, (R-IN), have promised to block the measure, which would deny myriad well-paying jobs to Americans in the GOP-dominated Midwest.

The mass transfer of jobs and careers to foreign graduates has coincided with the flat-lining of salaries for a wide range of U.S. college graduates.

“Most college graduates have actually seen their real incomes stagnate or even decline” since 2000, says New York Times columnist Paul Krugman. “Many of those who did manage to [graduate] found that the financial rewards were far smaller than they expected,” he said in an April 29 article that ignored immigration while urging more government spending to reduce unpaid college debt.

Krugman, however, drafted a chart showing how media white-collar wages have stagnated:

This existing displacement goes far beyond Silicon Valley or Fortune 500 jobs. For example, hospital chains have used the visa workers and immigration rules to bump at least 1 million Americans out of skilled nursing and other healthcare technician jobs. Nationwide, almost 20 million working-age men have been pushed out of the workforce by the massive inflow of low-wage migrants.

Extraction Migration

Since at least 1990, the D.C. establishment has extracted tens of millions of migrants and visa workers from poor countries to serve as legal or illegal workers, temporary workers, consumers, and renters for various U.S. investors and CEOs.

This economic strategy of Extraction Migration has no stopping point. It is brutal to ordinary Americans because it cuts their career opportunities, shrinks their salaries and wagesraises their housing costs, and has shoved at least ten million American men out of the labor force.

Extraction migration also distorts the economy and curbs Americans’ productivity, partly because it allows employers to use stoop labor instead of machines. Migration also reduces voters’ political clout, undermines employees’ workplace rights, and widens the regional wealth gaps between the Democrats’ coastal states and the Republicans’ Heartland and southern states.

An economy built on extraction migration also alienates young people and radicalizes Americans’ democratic, compromise-promoting civic culture because it allows wealthy elites to ignore despairing Americans at the bottom of society.

The policy is hidden behind a wide variety of excuses and explanations, such as the claim that the U.S. is a “Nation of Immigrants” or that Americans have a duty to accept foreign refugees. But the economic strategy also kills many migrants, exploits poor people, splits foreign families, and extracts wealth from the poor home countries.

The economic policy is backed by progressives who wish to transform the U.S. from a society governed by European-origin civic culture into a progressive-led empire of competing identity groups. “We’re trying to become the first multiracial, multi-ethnic superpower in the world,” Rep. Rohit Khanna (D-CA), told the New York Times on March 21. “It will be an extraordinary achievement … we will ultimately triumph,” he insisted.

Not surprisingly, the wealth-shifting extraction migration policy is very unpopular, according to a wide variety of polls. The polls show deep and broad public opposition to labor migration and the inflow of foreign contract workers into jobs sought by young U.S. graduates.

The opposition is growinganti-establishmentmultiracialcross-sexnon-racistclass-basedbipartisan,  rationalpersistent, and recognizes the solidarity that Americans owe to one another.

 

Biden Gives Up on Mandatory Vaccines for Migrants

Getty Images
 • May 2, 2022 5:00 am

SHARE

SOUTHMOST, Texas—The Biden administration appears to have abandoned its effort to ensure all migrants apprehended by immigration authorities are inoculated against COVID-19, just a month after the White House said vaccines would be mandatory.

According to several individuals familiar with the matter, some of whom requested anonymity to speak candidly, Border Patrol officials in the Rio Grande Valley are exempting migrants from such countries as Guatemala, Haiti, and Mexico from vaccine mandates. And migrants from Nicaragua, Cuba, and Venezuela must only receive one dose of the vaccine before they are released into the U.S. interior.

DHS in March issued a directive that some migrants in seven U.S. regions, including the Rio Grande Valley, must receive COVID-19 vaccinations or be placed into expedited deportation proceedings, the New York Times reported. That policy appears to have been scrapped—or at least modified—in favor of a voluntary vaccination program of one shot.

"It depends on the shift, to be honest," said one individual familiar with the matter. "You talk to guys who work around midnight, and they're not vaccinating anyone. It's really more of an optional policy."

A spokesman for Customs and Border Protection declined to comment.

The initial vaccination plan was widely seen as President Joe Biden's response to critics who allege his administration acted hypocritically when it implemented employer-based vaccine mandates without similar conditions for migrants who wish to enter the country. Scrapping that vaccination plan comes as DHS officials prepare for a surge in migrants following Biden's repeal of Title 42—a federal law that allows for the accelerated removal of migrants during a public health crisis—and as his Department of Justice fights in court to maintain a transportation mask mandate.

Outside the Rio Grande Valley, one Border Patrol Officer stationed in Arizona said he had never heard of any mandatory vaccination policy.

"We're getting steamrolled out here by the thousands," the officer said. "No, we are not vaccinating people."

At the Catholic Charities Humanitarian Respite Center in McAllen, Texas, hundreds of migrants from around the world pass through each day to receive health care, food, and other forms of assistance before they make their way farther into the U.S. interior. According to Sister Norma Pimentel, who runs the shelter, she works every day to persuade migrants to get the vaccine.

"The county set up a vaccination clinic right here," she told the Washington Free Beacon. "We push migrants to take it and say, ‘Look, you can't go anywhere without one.' But, you know, it's up to them really."

The Biden administration's public messaging on the issue has changed as well. Last month, the White House announced a policy expanding vaccinations of migrants of the southern border. Nowhere in that announcement, however, did the Biden administration say such vaccinations were mandatory.

"DHS has also been providing the COVID-19 vaccines to noncitizens in ICE custody since summer 2021," the announcement reads. "Beginning March 28, 2022, DHS expanded those efforts to cover migrants in CBP custody, so as to further safeguard public health and ensure the safety of border communities, the workforce, and migrants."

CBP has also not implemented COVID-19 testing policy for migrants, even though a September 2021 DHS inspector general report blasted the Biden administration for putting "its workforce, support staff, communities, and migrants at greater risk of contracting the virus." That lack of policy means the burden falls on charities, such as Pimentel's, to provide COVID-19 tests.

While left-wing activist groups such as Oxfam America have said people in Latin America "have access to vaccines," many Latin American countries have extremely low vaccination rates.

Guatemala, for example, has just over 36 percent of its population fully vaccinated, according to the vaccination tracking organization Our World in Data. The same organization found that just 1.1 percent of Haiti's population is fully vaccinated.

The outfit Obama worked for in Chicago is a good example.  Even at the time, old-school Democrats like Mayor Richard Daley saw the danger of CAA funding so many radical groups, with no real political constituency or accountability.

Why the Democrats Can Expect to Lose a Lot of Elections

Twenty twenty was a bitter defeat for many of us, and the charges of fraud were not without merit.  What wasn't true however were the tales of rigged voting machines swinging the election.  As I wrote not long afterward, the truth emerged, and it was just the same illegal ballot-harvesting operation the leftist activists always run, but this time with hundreds of millions in Silicon Valley dollars and the connivance of some election officials.

The new documentary out this week brilliantly documents how all this happened: D'Souza's 2000 Mules.

For all the illegality, though, I think 2020 is going to be seen as a Pyrrhic victory, with so many of the Democrats' bad ideas catching up with them and as the black and Hispanic base sours on Biden and his party.  A wipe-out in 2022 will surprise no one.

To a certain extent, we have been here before. Voters back in the 1980s walked away from the Democrats, heralding the Reagan Revolution, and many never looked back.  But a lot of party leaders understood their problems and did something about it.  The moderate Democratic Leadership Council, the DLC, which launched Bill Clinton's national career, were effective in pushing back on the McGovern wing and at least pretended to be sensible centrists.  "The era of big government is over," they said.

Today, the DLC is long gone, and even in the face of upcoming election collapse, the Democrats seem to be happy to take their marching orders from the kookiest people they can find, like AOC, who wants Biden to go even farther to the left.

We may never again see a moderate wing of the party.  Ruy Teixeira thinks the problem is that the Dems have lost touch with blue-collar workers.  So do Sohrab Ahmari and many other pundits.  But it is deeper than that.  White-collar suburban voters also hate CRT/transgender stuff in the schools, the rising crime rate, the inflation crisis, the open border, and the general obtuseness of Biden's foreign policy.

The problem is that there really is no longer a functioning Democrat party worthy of the name.  There is just an election plaything that goes by that name, run from the gilded board rooms of America's wealthiest non-profits.

People on the left are also starting realize this, like Sam Adler-Bell.  Michael Lind complains of the end of dissent in opinion journals, also the creature of the elite non-profits.  There is a lock-step conformity expected of all.  "Debate has been replaced by compulsory assent and ideas have been replaced by slogans that can be recited but not questioned: Black Lives Matter, Green Transition, Trans Women Are Women, 1619, Defund the Police."

I would go farther: although it's often said politics is downstream from culture — at least for Democrats and the American left — politics, culture, elite media, popular media, religion, education, and anything else are all downstream from the non-profit foundation complex that writes the grant money checks.  Checks for journalists, checks for activists, checks for politicians.

Political parties must be about the business of winning arguments and winning elections, at some point, lest they wither away.  But for the foundations and their executives, there is never any pressure to achieve such popular success.  They have their billion-dollar endowments, all invested in blue-chip American stocks paying huge dividends. They are secure and go on their merry way.  The biggest shame of it is that so many of these enormous foundations were begun by businessmen on the political right — Ford, Rockefeller, MacArthur, Mellon, etc. — only to have lefty activists hijack their boards.

Elected Democrats now have no interest in the average voter because that's not whom they work for.  It's the big money foundations and the armies of their paid activists.  They are the ones doing the all the ballot-harvesting that is finally being exposed in the 2000 Mules documentary.  They are the ones who can hand a presidential nomination to an Obama, a mansion to a BLM leader, or make a failure like Stacey Abrams very rich.

But that still raises a big question: why are so many Democrats, practical politicians, supposedly in touch with ordinary people, deep in the thrall of elite foundations?

I think it goes back to the formative days of our current politics, the early 1960s.  Amity Schlaes wrote a brilliant book about this era, Great Society, A New History, and her thesis is that just two men on opposite sides created much of the America we live in today.

One of them is Ronald Reagan, and you likely know a lot of his story, from running the Reds out of Hollywood in the 1940s, to teaming up with the visionary leaders of General Electric to fight the shop-floor militants of the 1950s and inspire a new kind of American business ethos, more entrepreneurial and participatory — the Theory Y leadership model.  Reagan then went into politics, as governor of California, to champion law and order and limited government.  This was when California really was the Golden State.

The other person is all but forgotten today: the UAW president, Walter Reuther.  Reuther started out as part of the anti-communist left of the labor movement.  He was happy to expel the Reds from the CIO in 1949 and merge with the much more conservative AFL not long afterward.  This also obliterated the UAW's chief rival, the communist-dominated Farm Equipment Workers Union.  Then, by the late 1950s, American unions were rolling in money from their dues and pension funds.  They scarcely knew where to put it all.  The Teamsters famously lent it to mob associates to build Las Vegas.

Reuther's UAW, thanks to all those booming Detroit assembly lines, had more money than anyone, and he meant to use it to transform America into what he understood was the worker's paradise of Sweden.  Millions in union grant money went to his pet projects and activists.

Martin Luther King and his Southern Christian Leadership Council would have been but a footnote in American history without the UAW's money and people helping him.  This allowed MLK to organize the enormous marches and protests that made him famous.  MLK even became something of a Reuther disciple in his later years, embracing Scandinavian economic ideas.  Reuther also got the far-left SDS and Tom Hayden going, organizing a youth movement at the UAW's resort complex at Port Huron in 1962.  Just about every Alinsky-style group in America was eventually getting UAW money.

And then Reuther convinced LBJ to have the federal government fund the massive Great Society programs.  Unlike the New Deal, where federal dollars were distributed directly through government agencies, thanks to Reuther, the Great Society was run in large measure in partnership with non-profit groups on the left, from older organizations like Planned Parenthood to new Alinsky-style inner-city groups funded by the Community Action Agency.  The outfit Obama worked for in Chicago is a good example.  Even at the time, old-school Democrats like Mayor Richard Daley saw the danger of CAA funding so many radical groups, with no real political constituency or accountability.

But it was too late.  A vast network of activist groups grew in every state, with their billions in federal grant money, union support, and private corporate foundations, to swallow up local party Democrats one after another.  In effect, the "mules," the foundation-funded activists, have replaced the donkeys of the old party.

So that's what we see today, the culmination of mega-rich woke foundations creating a political party in their own image.  The modern Democrat party, led by Joe Biden, has become nothing but a Potemkin façade, with no real organic constituency.  It doesn't even matter to them if the Democrat lose a lot of elections from here on out.  Their massive endowments keep paying the bills for their luxury lifestyle.  The Democrat party is just a flashy "loss leader."

Several cycles of defeats may eventually lead to a new generation of actual politicians wanting to reclaim the party from the foundations.  But that is a long way off.  The foundation mule Democrats don't seem to have a winning future.

As an old Republican philosopher once remarked, the mule has neither pride of ancestry nor hope of posterity.


IT WAS THIS NEO-FASCIST FOR OPEN BORDERS, MARK ZUCKERBERG, WHO GOT THIS GAMER PIG LAWYER JOE BIDEN ELECTED! AND NOW WHAT?!?

A few weeks ago, David Bossie released his film, also titled Rigged.   It exposed the scheme perpetrated by Mark Zuckerberg; “Zuckerbucks” had spent over $400m to fraudulently rnsure a Biden victory.  

This week brings the release of Dinesh D’Souza’s film, 2000 Mules.  This film exposes and explains how paid “mules” in numerous states stuffed those drop boxes that Zuckerberg paid for with many thousands of ballots faked or harvested.  Using geo-tracking of cell phones, Catherine Engelbrecht of True the Vote and Gregg Harris uncovered two thousand people who were paid via a variety of leftist non-profits to stuff those drop boxes, over and over again.  


The consequences of the stolen 2020 election are increasingly catastrophic

Last year Mollie Hemingway wrote a book about the 2020 election.  Its title was Rigged, How the Media, Big Tech, and the Democrats Seized our Elections.  It is a comprehensive story of the numerous ways the left orchestrated the Biden win.   

A few weeks ago, David Bossie released his film, also titled Rigged.   It exposed the scheme perpetrated by Mark Zuckerberg; “Zuckerbucks” had spent over $400m to fraudulently rnsure a Biden victory.  

This week brings the release of Dinesh D’Souza’s film, 2000 Mules.  This film exposes and explains how paid “mules” in numerous states stuffed those drop boxes that Zuckerberg paid for with many thousands of ballots faked or harvested.  Using geo-tracking of cell phones, Catherine Engelbrecht of True the Vote and Gregg Harris uncovered two thousand people who were paid via a variety of leftist non-profits to stuff those drop boxes, over and over again.  

The film is a shocking expose and reveals yet another very complex and devious way certain leftist non-profits cheated to win.  There can no longer be any question that Trump handily won the 2020 election and that the most criminal methods in American history were employed to steal his victory from the American people.  

Neither film, Rigged nor 2000 Mules, addressed the possible manipulation of the voting machines by way of illicit programming and/or possible hacking via their connection to the internet.  Those issues have been deeply covered by several cyber experts.  Peter Navarro’s report early on also essentially proved that the 2020 election was marred by massive fraud.  

The elephant in the room is this:  Why has no DOJ investigation been mounted given the overwhelming volumes of evidence of election fraud?  Why have the courts dismissed each case without even looking at the evidence?  The only answer is that the DOJ, every other federal law enforcement agency and the corporate media are corrupt.  They are all agents of the Democrat party.  As Dennis Prager often comments, truth is not a left-wing value.

Beyond the mules, the illegally harvested ballots, fake ballots that were never folded, mailed or signed, the finagling of people like Republican Gov. Kemp and Sec of State Raffensperger of Georgia and the never-Trump powers that be in Colorado, Arizona, Nevada, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Michigan and probably numerous other states, the 2020 election was the most dishonest, the most unscrupulous in American history.  Unable to accept her defeat in 2016, Hillary Clinton fabricated the notion that Russia facilitated Trump’s win, which gave birth to the entirely phony Mueller investigation, the trumped up impeachments based on nothing and the equally fabricated “insurrection” charges about January 6.   

The Democrats have descended into the ninth circle of hell.  They are willing to destroy the nation rather than see Trump’s MAGA movement succeed anywhere. 

The Biden regime has embraced the tactics of Marx and Mao and the prescient fantasies of George Orwell to gain and maintain control over the American population, all the while importing millions of migrants from around the world into the country.  Biden seems intent upon ruining the country by any means possible.  He’s rendered us energy dependent again so that Americans are paying $6+ for gas.  Inflation is soaring, dragging us into a recession, likely depression.  This sad state of affairs was fodder for comedy at the WHCD; Biden heartily laughed at the misery he has stoked.

Twitter video screengrab

Biden and the military industrial complex wanted this war in Ukraine and are escalating it.   The Ukrainian people are cannon fodder in a dangerously misguided attempt to take down Putin.  The warmongers are at it again, briefly interrupted by President Trump, the arms dealers want a war.  Now the administration is depleting the American defensive arms inventory by shipping them to Ukraine and sending billions of taxpayer dollars that simply do not exist, money that, if it did exist, could be spent on protecting our southern border, not Ukraine’s eastern border.  Ukraine is a European problem, not an American responsibility. 

All this chaos and destruction is due to the catastrophic consequences of a stolen election.  Purposeful?  Indeed.  The Biden administration’s agenda is the destruction of America, its middle and working classes and the power of its currency.  Biden is bowing to China, Russia and for inexplicable reasons intent upon letting Iran have nukes. Each of those countries are mortal enemies of the US but each with leverage over this terrible President.  He has sold out his country for unearned wealth.  There are volumes of evidence, proof actually, that the 2020 election was grossly fraudulent.  Who among our numerous law enforcement agencies will go to bat for the American people?  Someone has got to go to prison.   Every American needs to see 2000 Mules


The only reason that Biden became president is because Democrat campaign workers, posing as journalists, buried a truthful story about the Biden family corruption that most of them knew was true. They still intentionally hide the truth of the depth and breadth of the corruption from the public because they know Biden's and other Democrats’ poll numbers would be much worse if the public knew the truth. 

THE BIDEN CRIME MAFIA   -  50 YEARS OF BRIBES

A 'corrupt family occupies the White House'




May The Truth Be With You



A FEW HUNDRED REASONS WHY LAWYER-POLITICIANS SHOULD BE BANNED FROM SEEKING ELECTIVE OFFICE:

MOST ARE SOCIOPATHS AND BRIBES SUCKING GAMERS OF THE LAW ALL ARE DESPERATE PARASITES EAGER TO GET AT THE MONEY NO MATTER ANYTHING!

https://ca-judicial-performance-hoax.blogspot.com/2022/04/should-lawyers-be-banned-from-elective.html

THE BIDEN CRIME MAFIA   -  50 YEARS OF BRIBES

A 'corrupt family occupies the White House'



Schweizer: Independent Counsel Needed to Investigate Hunter Biden

1:28

In an interview set to air on Sunday’s broadcast of Fox News Channel’s “Life, Liberty & Levin,” Breitbart News senior contributor and Government Accountability Institute president Peter Schweizer said an independent counsel would be required to investigate Hunter Biden’s financial dealings given the potential conflict of interest for his father, President Joe Biden.

Schweizer, the author of Red-Handed: How American Elites Get Rich Helping China Win, also warned the case could be settled outside of court without public knowledge.

“This is a tailor-made case for an independent counsel,” Schweizer said. “It’s an investigation involving the family of the president. The attorney general is, of course, appointed by the president. And he’s the one who’s going to direct this U.S. attorney that has this grand jury in Delaware — so you need an independent counsel.”

“There is lots of evidence … some of that money ended up with Joe Biden,” he added. “The money was fungible. It moved around. It went to James Biden and others.”

Schweizer also told FNC host Mark Levin the investigation might find opposition from Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) because of the business interests that McConnell and his wife, former Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao, have abroad.

Follow Jeff Poor on Twitter @jeff_poor


video - shocking facts on joe biden's staggering corruption1

Sen. Johnson blasts DHS's new misinformation board as 'Orwellian'





JOE BIDEN = MENTAL!

They’ll Say Anything For Money

Just Blame The Other Guy



He Used Mind Control

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egMUZRO0bdI


Joe Biden is 'ghosting' Kamala Harris





Ted Cruz: Red ‘tsunami’ coming in November




BIDEN'S NEO-FASCIST ATTEMPT TO CONTROL FREE SPEECH.

Biden and Pelosi are the real source of 'misinformation': GOP lawmaker

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhV_OU7oaP0



Biden should be thankful for the media, but it has nothing to do with the truth or protecting democracy

President Biden was thankful for the media during the White House Correspondents Dinner.

From an AP article:

While the majority of the speech was filled with cutting jabs, Biden did make note of the important role journalism plays in American democracy, especially in the last decade.

"I mean this from the bottom of my heart, that you, the free press, more than you ever did in the last century" he said: " you are the guardians of the truth:

The President and his party should be happy with the press, but it has nothing to do with them being the guardians of the truth or protecting democracy.

The only reason that Biden became president is because Democrat campaign workers, posing as journalists, buried a truthful story about the Biden family corruption that most of them knew was true. They still intentionally hide the truth of the depth and breadth of the corruption from the public because they know Biden's and other Democrats’ poll numbers would be much worse if the public knew the truth. .

For the four years before the 2020 election, they also intentionally lied about Russian collusion and repeatedly called Trump an illegitimate president. They still bury most of what Durham has found about the deep corruption of the government and Hillary.

Much of what most of the media reports has anything to do with the truth or protecting democracy. It has everything to do with maintaining and getting more power for Democrats.

It is the media that is the greatest existential threat to our freedom, prosperity and survival as a great country, not challenging election results or anything to do with fossil fuels.

Isn't it time that journalists started doing their jobs instead of acting like talking sock puppets?

Photo credit: YouTube screengrab

JUDICIAL WATCH’S TEN MOST CORRUPT LIST

President Barack Obama: During his presidential campaign, President Obama promised to run an ethical and transparent administration. However, in his first year in office, the President has delivered corruption and secrecy, bringing Chicago-style political corruption to the White House. JUDICIAL WATCH


A few weeks ago, David Bossie released his film, also titled Rigged.   It exposed the scheme perpetrated by Mark Zuckerberg; “Zuckerbucks” had spent over $400m to fraudulently rnsure a Biden victory.  

This week brings the release of Dinesh D’Souza’s film, 2000 Mules.  This film exposes and explains how paid “mules” in numerous states stuffed those drop boxes that Zuckerberg paid for with many thousands of ballots faked or harvested.  Using geo-tracking of cell phones, Catherine Engelbrecht of True the Vote and Gregg Harris uncovered two thousand people who were paid via a variety of leftist non-profits to stuff those drop boxes, over and over again.  

Well aware that the voice of the people threatens the trajectory of the global elite agenda, the former president used the opportunity to double down on what he does best, which is to manipulate minds with clever word games. The stunning effort focused on convincing the naïve that government control of public discourse somehow strengthens “democracy.”

BIDEN'S NEO-FASCIST ATTEMPT TO CONTROL FREE SPEECH.

Biden and Pelosi are the real source of 'misinformation': GOP lawmaker

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhV_OU7oaP0


HOW MANY OF THESE PIGS ARE GAMER LAWYERS?

“Protect and enrich.” This is a perfect encapsulation of the Clinton (LAWYERS-2) Foundation and the (LAWYERS-2) Obama book and television deals. Then there is the Biden (LAWYERS-3) family corruption, followed closely behind by similar abuses of power and office by the (LAWYER) Warren and Sanders families, as Peter Schweizer described in his recent book “Profiles in Corruption.” These names just scratch the surface of government corruption (YOU CAN ADD LAWYER KAMALA HARRIS AND LAWYER CHUCK SCHUMER TO THE PATHEION OF DEMOCRAT BRIBES SUCKING CORRUPT LAWYER POLITICIANS!)         BRIAN C JOONDEPH 

NEO-FASCIST MARK ZUCKERBERG SAYS HE WILL ELECT OBOMB FOR A THIRD TERM!

Barack Obama Calls for More Censorship: First Amendment ‘Does Not Apply to Facebook and Twitter’

https://ca-judicial-performance-hoax.blogspot.com/2022/04/lawless-lawyers-bankster-regime-of.html

 

Obama’s Fundamental Manipulation of Free Speech

Setting the stage for the DHS announcement of the Biden Administration’s Disinformation Governance Board recently, at a Stanford University Cyber Policy Center symposium entitled, “Challenges to Democracy in the Digital Information Realm,” deceptive mind-control specialist Barack Obama emerged from behind his Joe Biden mask to deliver the keynote speech. 

According to the anonymous author of the 2009 Department of Homeland Security treatise on “right-wing extremism,” government needs to help companies better “…recognize the often-dangerous relationship between social media, nationalism [and] domestic hate groups” like pro-lifers, ex-military, Second Amendment supporters, Christians, and America-First patriots.

Well aware that the voice of the people threatens the trajectory of the global elite agenda, the former president used the opportunity to double down on what he does best, which is to manipulate minds with clever word games. The stunning effort focused on convincing the naïve that government control of public discourse somehow strengthens “democracy.”

Attempting to persuade Americans that controlling free speech correlates with democratic non-complacency, Obama argued that limiting freedom “nurtures” democracy by instituting a policy that runs counter to freedom.  

Credit where credit is due, the former president is masterful at presenting nonexistent consensuses as if they truly exist. Take for instance his suggestion that questioning the 2020 election threatens “democratic ideals” and is tantamount to affiliation with Putin, while simultaneously inferring everyone agrees that the 2016 election was stolen from Hillary.

The Alinsky-mentee repeatedly portrayed American citizens as threats to the republic by juxtaposing extremes with divisive statements like:

People like Putin and Steve Bannon, for that matter, understand people don’t need to believe this information to weaken democratic institutions. You just have to flood a country’s public square with enough raw sewage. You just have to raise enough questions, spread enough dirt, and plant enough conspiracy theorizing that citizens no longer know what to believe.

So, in other words, democratic institutions will be strengthened when Barack Obama’s “raw sewage” answers all our questions and dictates what we must think and believe?

Amongst the trustworthy mix of oppressed freedom fighters, Barack presented himself, mainstream media shills, the government he’s likely coordinating, and then pointed out those he deems untrustworthy: anyone who causes Americans to distrust each other by disagreeing with his vision. 

Word to the wise, when the former self-proclaimed “target of disinformation,” Barack Obama, exonerates himself, the mainstream media, and political institutions, and then asks, “So where do we go from here?” freedom-loving Americans best listen up.

On behalf of a perverted definition of “democracy,” and sounding like a recruitment ad for “Public Enlightenment,” the former community organizer attempted to rally “the tech community, not just its corporate leaders, but employees at every level have to be part of the solution” to “push,” i.e., “nudge” employers to submit to Communist Command and Control.

The former president depicted dictatorial control freaks as global uniters and feigned a desire for unity by stirring suspicions of voter suppression in black and brown communities, mentioning racism, white supremacism, Putin-like ethnonationalism, “sexism, class conflict, religious strife, greed, envy, and all the deadly sins.” Exempting himself from the division he cultivates, according to Obama, muzzling opposing opinions will “help tamp down divisions and let us rebuild the trust and solidarity needed to make our democracy stronger.”  

Convincing the credulous that he is a supporter of free speech and in favor of a “free, robust, sometimes antagonistic exchange of ideas,” Obama stressed that democratic ideals will be realized when the news media, and private companies like Facebook and Twitter, submit to the proposed management of a product that -- when it disagrees with him -- disseminates what Obama calls “toxic information.” Seven months before a midterm election, the former president insisted that “while content moderation can limit the distribution of clearly dangerous content, it doesn’t go far enough.” Therefore, “these big platforms need to be subject to some level of public oversight and regulation” that surely he will be closely involved in overseeing.

Imagine this, Obama proposed that government monitoring of algorithms “spurs innovation,” and eliminates competition for communities of color, because in the end, despite “extraordinarily good faith in some cases,” deplatforming and canceling the left’s detractors is simply not enough to “keep the rest of us safe.” Say what?

With that in mind, let’s review: COVID vaccines (that he mistakenly admitted were clinically tested on “billions”) “keep us safe,” Anthony Fauci’s masked edicts “keep us safe,” mail-in ballots “keep us safe,” Democrat poll watchers “keep us safe,” gun-control crackdowns “keep us safe,” and now, government regulation of free speech, will also “keep us safe.”  

Shrewdly, Obama protested too much when he asserted that he’s certainly not suggesting that fairness exclude “views diametrically opposed” to his own, or that opinions and divisions be “fixed.” Oh, no, no, no! Instead, he said that there could be an effort to fundamentally transform or “redesign” and “broaden our perspectives” by mimicking “hard core Hannity, Carlson fans,” being successfully brainwashed by exclusive exposure to CNN, which, according to Obama, has the potential to change “perspectives.” Put another way, does Obama think viewing FOX ‘unmeaningful,’ and singular exposure to CNN helpful in safeguarding his idea of “democracy” by “reshaping” political opinion in “meaningful ways?” 

Is that why, Obama believes that the “common baseline of how we debate and sort out our disagreements,” would be better managed by the governance of a First Amendment dictated to by ideologies that agree with the left’s definition of what a demon like Barack Obama calls, “better angels?” Or that efforts to preserve democracy must include kids being taught to become “critical thinkers” by limiting exposure to differing opinions on things like climate change, sexuality, COVID vaccines, Putin, elections, and January 6th?

Wanting to curtail free speech from the beginning, Obama even managed to squeeze in a backhanded criticism of the “flawed” U.S. Constitution by insinuating that undermining the First Amendment fosters a “more perfect union” and likened government regulation of free speech to amendments abolishing slavery, and granting women the right to vote. 

Obama, the controlling “tool” of the global elite, ended this alarming address by saying:

[a]t the end of the day, tools don’t control us. We control them, and we can remake them. It’s up to each of us to decide what we value and then use the tools we’ve been given to advance those values. And I believe we should use every tool at our disposal to secure our greatest gift: a government of, by, for the people, for generations to come. 

By defining the voice of the people as a “steady stream of bile and vitriol,” Obama’s attempt at implied consensus, again attempted to convert Americans to “fight for [his] truth and to pick [his] side,” or chance being branded -- “for generations to come” -- as responsible for “allow[ing] our democracy to wither.” 

Jeannie hosts a blog at www.jeannieology.us


The Master of Misinformation is Still in Charge

Obama touts more “regulation” of the internet -- in his quest for a fourth term in 2024.

7 comments

At the White House on April 5, former president Barack Obama introduced “vice president Joe Biden,” claiming “that was a joke!” Joe Biden wasn’t laughing. The Delaware Democrat is clearly incapable of exercising national office, and after the Afghanistan debacle openly said he was “instructed” to call on certain reporters.

“He is not in charge,” observed Stephen Miller of The Spectator, and as Tiana Lowe of the Washington Examiner wondered,  “who the hell is in charge here?” That became clear on April 5, but it was already apparent long before.

“The country was in better shape now than it had been when I’d started,” claims POTUS 44 in A Promised Land, released two weeks after the 2020 election. This 751-page auto-hagiography is a bloated rehash of the 2015 Believer, by “Obama’s narrator” David Axelrod. The former Barry Soetoro touts his “calling,” leaving little doubt that Biden is the front man in his current third term.

Joe Biden had a “handsome face always cast in a dazzling smile,” A Promised Land explains. On domestic issues Joe was smart and “his experience in foreign policy was broad and deep.” And so on, in vintage Axelrod style.

On Biden’s watch, Putin invades Ukraine. On the domestic scene crime, inflation and gas prices are soaring, and only 17 percent of Americans rank the economy as excellent or good, the lowest since 2014. Even so, two weeks after the Obama White House appearance, Biden let it slip that he is running for re-election in 2024. The way things are now, the Delaware Democrat says in effect, is the way they are going to be moving forward. That too relates to The Promised Land author.

In his April 5 White House appearance, he touted Obamacare, which advanced a strategic objective. Contrary to what the president proclaimed, you couldn’t keep your plan or your doctor. Under Obamacare, you get only the care the government wants you to have. Remember, the author of Dreams from my Father, The Audacity of Hope, and A Promised Land was all about “fundamentally transforming the United States of America,” which was already a top-heavy welfare state.

Obamacare was demolition to clear the ground for “single payer,” the government monopoly system favored by totalitarian states. This was hardly the only fundamental transformation.

On April 21 at Stanford University, the former president proclaimed that “people are dying because of misinformation” about the vaccines he proclaimed “safe” and “effective” because “clinically tested on billions of people worldwide.” No word about adverse reactions or misinformation from Dr. Anthony Fauci, the non-practicing MD who proclaims “I represent science.”

According to 44, online misinformation is about “the competition between truth and falsehood, cooperation and conflict.” Misinformation is the province of those who “continue to cast doubt on the legitimacy of the last election.” As POTUS 44 has it, misinformation flows from “people like Putin and Steve Bannon,” who  “understand it’s not necessary for people to believe this information in order to weaken democratic institutions.”

No one in his administration was “surprised that Russia was attempting to meddle in our election.” No word that the Russia hoax was pure misinformation, endlessly recycled by establishment and social media. “Regulation has to be part of the answer,” says the former president, whose 7,054-word, hour-long speech mentions “regulation” six times.

For all but the willfully blind,  the former president wants to rig the internet to censor and cancel Biden’s political opponents. During 44’s  first term, he transformed the nation into a place where security agencies neglect foreign adversaries and target his domestic opposition. Under 44, the upper reaches of the FBI and DOJ, along with key players in the CIA and intelligence community, deployed against candidate and President Trump.

For the FBI, those less than worshipful of the Biden Junta are domestic terrorists, violent extremists, and so on. The Department of Homeland Security neglects terrorism and targets misinformation, such as “false or misleading narratives regarding unsubstantiated widespread election fraud and COVID-19.”

Meanwhile, in his Stanford speech, POTUS 44 claimed he “spent years being a target of disinformation” when he actually embodies it.  His 1995 Dreams from My Father, for example, came billed as an autobiography. In Rising Star: The Making of Barack Obama, David Garrow revealed that Dreams from My Father was not an autobiography or memoir.

“Without any question,” wrote Garrow, Dreams was a novel and the author a “composite character.” His beloved “Frank,” portrayed as a happy-drunk poet, is Frank Marshall Davis, the African American Communist who spent most of his life serving an all-white Soviet dictatorship.

The  composite character now seeks to rig the internet to cancel political opponents and gain a fourth term through Joe Biden.

In 2013, the composite character touted Kamala Harris as the “best looking attorney general.” In 2022 vice president Harris is not looking good as a replacement for the addled Biden, who recently claimed that he served as a liaison between Israel and Egypt during the Six Day War in 1967, when he was still in law school.

As Trump says, we’ll have to see what happens. In the meantime, the struggle of truth against misinformation, prosperity versus poverty, and freedom against tyranny, is all about memory against forgetting.



IS BARACK OBAMA STILL THE MOST 

DANGEROUS MAN IN AMERICA???


THE BIDEN CRIME MAFIA   -  50 YEARS OF BRIBES

A 'corrupt family occupies the White House'




The Master of Misinformation is Still in Charge

Obama touts more “regulation” of the internet -- in his quest for a fourth term in 2024.

7 comments

At the White House on April 5, former president Barack Obama introduced “vice president Joe Biden,” claiming “that was a joke!” Joe Biden wasn’t laughing. The Delaware Democrat is clearly incapable of exercising national office, and after the Afghanistan debacle openly said he was “instructed” to call on certain reporters.

“He is not in charge,” observed Stephen Miller of The Spectator, and as Tiana Lowe of the Washington Examiner wondered,  “who the hell is in charge here?” That became clear on April 5, but it was already apparent long before.

“The country was in better shape now than it had been when I’d started,” claims POTUS 44 in A Promised Land, released two weeks after the 2020 election. This 751-page auto-hagiography is a bloated rehash of the 2015 Believer, by “Obama’s narrator” David Axelrod. The former Barry Soetoro touts his “calling,” leaving little doubt that Biden is the front man in his current third term.

Joe Biden had a “handsome face always cast in a dazzling smile,” A Promised Land explains. On domestic issues Joe was smart and “his experience in foreign policy was broad and deep.” And so on, in vintage Axelrod style.

On Biden’s watch, Putin invades Ukraine. On the domestic scene crime, inflation and gas prices are soaring, and only 17 percent of Americans rank the economy as excellent or good, the lowest since 2014. Even so, two weeks after the Obama White House appearance, Biden let it slip that he is running for re-election in 2024. The way things are now, the Delaware Democrat says in effect, is the way they are going to be moving forward. That too relates to The Promised Land author.

In his April 5 White House appearance, he touted Obamacare, which advanced a strategic objective. Contrary to what the president proclaimed, you couldn’t keep your plan or your doctor. Under Obamacare, you get only the care the government wants you to have. Remember, the author of Dreams from my Father, The Audacity of Hope, and A Promised Land was all about “fundamentally transforming the United States of America,” which was already a top-heavy welfare state.

Obamacare was demolition to clear the ground for “single payer,” the government monopoly system favored by totalitarian states. This was hardly the only fundamental transformation.

On April 21 at Stanford University, the former president proclaimed that “people are dying because of misinformation” about the vaccines he proclaimed “safe” and “effective” because “clinically tested on billions of people worldwide.” No word about adverse reactions or misinformation from Dr. Anthony Fauci, the non-practicing MD who proclaims “I represent science.”

According to 44, online misinformation is about “the competition between truth and falsehood, cooperation and conflict.” Misinformation is the province of those who “continue to cast doubt on the legitimacy of the last election.” As POTUS 44 has it, misinformation flows from “people like Putin and Steve Bannon,” who  “understand it’s not necessary for people to believe this information in order to weaken democratic institutions.”

No one in his administration was “surprised that Russia was attempting to meddle in our election.” No word that the Russia hoax was pure misinformation, endlessly recycled by establishment and social media. “Regulation has to be part of the answer,” says the former president, whose 7,054-word, hour-long speech mentions “regulation” six times.

For all but the willfully blind,  the former president wants to rig the internet to censor and cancel Biden’s political opponents. During 44’s  first term, he transformed the nation into a place where security agencies neglect foreign adversaries and target his domestic opposition. Under 44, the upper reaches of the FBI and DOJ, along with key players in the CIA and intelligence community, deployed against candidate and President Trump.

For the FBI, those less than worshipful of the Biden Junta are domestic terrorists, violent extremists, and so on. The Department of Homeland Security neglects terrorism and targets misinformation, such as “false or misleading narratives regarding unsubstantiated widespread election fraud and COVID-19.”

Meanwhile, in his Stanford speech, POTUS 44 claimed he “spent years being a target of disinformation” when he actually embodies it.  His 1995 Dreams from My Father, for example, came billed as an autobiography. In Rising Star: The Making of Barack Obama, David Garrow revealed that Dreams from My Father was not an autobiography or memoir.

“Without any question,” wrote Garrow, Dreams was a novel and the author a “composite character.” His beloved “Frank,” portrayed as a happy-drunk poet, is Frank Marshall Davis, the African American Communist who spent most of his life serving an all-white Soviet dictatorship.

The  composite character now seeks to rig the internet to cancel political opponents and gain a fourth term through Joe Biden.

In 2013, the composite character touted Kamala Harris as the “best looking attorney general.” In 2022 vice president Harris is not looking good as a replacement for the addled Biden, who recently claimed that he served as a liaison between Israel and Egypt during the Six Day War in 1967, when he was still in law school.

As Trump says, we’ll have to see what happens. In the meantime, the struggle of truth against misinformation, prosperity versus poverty, and freedom against tyranny, is all about memory against forgetting.

BIDEN OPERATES A CRIME WAVE WITH LAWYER HUNTER BIDEN DURING THE CORRUPT LAWYER BARACK OBAMA BANKSTER REGIME

This isn’t just Joe Biden: Gingrich


BIDEN OPERATES WHITE COLLAR CRIMES OF INFLUENCE PEDDLING OUT OF THE OBOMB WHITE HOUSE

The Faulkner Focus  Breaking News




Joe Biden paid $800k in legal fees for Hunter according to email

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MV_s4y-kxm4


GAMER LAWYER JOE BIDEN’S LIFE OF CRIME

https://ca-judicial-performance-hoax.blogspot.com/2022/04/the-lawless-lawyer-class-is-gamer.html

The discrepancy raises questions about where the nearly $5.2 million might have originated.

In April, Joe Biden claimed he doesn’t “think you should make money while you’re in office.”

However, emails from Hunter’s laptop appeared to show great sums of money were transferred to the Biden family via the scion’s shady overseas business.

 David Bernstein & The Heritage Foundation - “Lawless: The Obama Administration’s Unprecedented Assault on the Constitution and the Rule of Law.”

 

“The Lawlessness of the Obama Administration: A

never-ending story.” 


Michael Barone – American Historian –  Washington Examiner

 

NEO-FASCIST MARK ZUCKERBERG SAYS HE WILL ELECT OBOMB FOR A THIRD TERM!


Barack Obama Calls for More Censorship: First Amendment ‘Does Not Apply to Facebook and Twitter’

https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2022/04/mark-zuckerberg-i-am-senile-joe-bidens.html

JUDICIAL WATCH’S TEN MOST CORRUPT LIST

President Barack Obama: During his presidential campaign, President Obama promised to run an ethical and transparent administration. However, in his first year in office, the President has delivered corruption and secrecy, bringing Chicago-style political corruption to the White House. JUDICIAL WATCH

 

HOW MANY OF THESE PIGS ARE GAMER LAWYERS?

“Protect and enrich.” This is a perfect encapsulation of the Clinton (LAWYERS-2) Foundation and the (LAWYERS-2) Obama book and television deals. Then there is the Biden (LAWYERS-3) family corruption, followed closely behind by similar abuses of power and office by the (LAWYER) Warren and Sanders families, as Peter Schweizer described in his recent book “Profiles in Corruption.” 

These names just scratch the surface of government corruption (YOU CAN ADD LAWYER KAMALA HARRIS AND LAWYER CHUCK SCHUMER TO THE PATHEION OF DEMOCRAT BRIBES SUCKING CORRUPT LAWYER POLITICIANS!)         BRIAN C JOONDEPH


‘Ministry of Truth’ Reveals Ruling Class Weakness

All we white supremacists and armed insurrectionists and ordinary deplorables are outraged this week by the creation of the “Disinformation Governance Board.”

But it’s probably not the end of the world. Even Politico’s Jack Shafer thinks it’s a stupid idea.

DHS couldn’t stamp out disinformation or erect an American Reich if we reallocated to it all of the arms we’re currently shipping to Ukraine. It’s peopled by a confederacy of dunces and botch-artists, incapable of carrying out its current mission.

So I say: let us stitch together a narrative that experiences the Biden regime and its globalist co-conspirators as Keystone Kops rather than Nineteen Eighty-Four’s cunning O’Brien.

Take the eternal fight against inequality, that to me is epitomized by Frenchie Thomas Piketty. Piketty has a new book out, A Brief History of Equality, and I can’t think why, because I thought I had reduced his notions on inequality in Capital in the Twenty-first Century to chopped liver back in 2014.

Against all the disinformation on everything from homelessness to wealth, I give you this, according to Google Search:

According to Statista, the current number of smartphone users in the world today is 6.648 billion, and this means 83.72% of the world's population owns a smartphone.

Do you ever stop to realize how stunning this is? If we say that Steve Jobs and his techie chappies put out the first smartphone in 2008, we are talking about going from zero to 84 percent of the world in 14 years.

So it’s a moral and political disaster that smartphone producers have made trillions? After getting smartphones to nearly everyone in the world in 14 years? You think you could have done that, lefty, using an appropriate tax on the rich and a Cell Back Better program from Klaus Schwab and a battalion of Cell Lives Matter activists funded by George Soros?

And think of the upside, lefties. Today you have the Widow Jobs financing all kinds of stupid lefty rubbish with lots of lovely NGO jobs for lefty activists -- all feasting on dearly departed hubby’s ill-gotten gains.

What do you care how much Jobs made out of Apple when teenagers in India with smartphones can ask tourists at rock temples for a selfie? What do you care if Musk made billions out of SpaceX, when he can turn on a dime and send an emergency shipment of Starlink thingies to Ukraine?

What I think is that everything our rulers obsess about right now -- from green energy to disinformation to equity to systemic racism to the vital importance of teaching kiddies all about transgender -- is the ruling class in a defensive crouch that won’t mean a thing in five years.

Maybe it’s a good thing that they are obsessing about stuff that won’t make a blind bit of difference, except to end their regime a bit earlier than it might have if they’d had half a brain.

Yes, I know that Curtis Yarvin says that all government is aristocracy, and “Every true revolution is the replacement of an old aristocracy by a new one.” But the devil is in the details, as illustrated in The Americanization of Benjamin Franklin by Gordon S. Wood.

Wood takes Franklin through all his phases, from escaped apprentice to businessman to bestselling author to gentleman to Brit Deep Stater, to accidental bomb-thrower and finally the diplomat in Paris who won the Revolutionary War by talking the French into helping ditch the Brits at Yorktown.

Here’s the thing: Franklin first thought that the Brits and the Yanks should be one happy nation, and spent ten years in London from 1764 trying to make it so. But it turned out that everyone else thought differently. The daily life-world in North America and the daily life-world in Britain led people to experience themselves as two separate nations. And so, in North America, we got a ruling class that made it so. And we got an aristocracy of Washington and Hamilton and Jefferson and Madison to get the new regime started.

(By the way, when I say “life-world” I am using the incredibly sophisticated notion of German lefty Jürgen Habermas who got it from the Nazi Martin Heidegger who got it from the Jew Edmund Husserl. I don’t think you chaps at the Disinformation Governance Board have the chops to understand all this, so why not send out for a vegan pizza.)

Here’s my prediction for our rulers’ Cunning Plans over the next two years. All the Disinformation stuff and J6 Committee hearings and Zuckbucks and ballot mules and ESG’d corporations won’t make a blind bit of difference as Americans suffer through the next two years of inflation and recession.

In 2024 they will not just be voting for Time for a Change. They will be begging for a leader to lead them out of slavery in the Land of Woke into a Promised Land.

Christopher Chantrill @chrischantrill runs the go-to site on US government finances, usgovernmentspending.com. Also get his American Manifesto and his Road to the Middle Class.

Image: Duncan C


White House Defends DHS Disinformation Board as ‘Non-Partisan and Apolitical’ Despite Nina Jankowicz Public Support for Hillary Clinton

Hillary Clinton attends the Gender Equality Conference at BI Business School on March 8, 2019 in Oslo, Norway. (Photo by Rune Hellestad/Getty Images)
Rune Hellestad/Getty Images, DHS
2:35

The White House on Monday said the newly created Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) Disinformation Governance Board would be “non-partisan” despite the leader of the board’s history of partisan statements on social media.

“The mandate is not to adjudicate what is true or false online or otherwise, it will operate in a non-partisan and apolitical manner,” White House press secretary Jen Psaki told reporters at the daily briefing.

The appointed executive director of the board, Nina Jankowicz, publicly stated her support for failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton during the 2016 election.

“Maybe Hillary Clinton’s most important point so far: A Donald Trump presidency would embolden ISIS,” she wrote on Twitter with the hashtag #ImWithHer.

During the 2016 election, Jankowicz spread discredited stories about then-presidential candidate Donald Trump’s ties to Russia and the Kremlin.

Jankowicz also repeatedly criticized former President Trump’s use of social media and scolded tech companies for failing to punish him for controversial posts on Twitter.

She also repeatedly pointed to claims that the Hunter Biden laptop was part of a Russian disinformation operation to affect the 2020 presidential election.

In 2020, Jankowicz even defended Christopher Steel’s thoughts on disinformation after his widely discredited Russian dossier was widely discredited as a major source for lies about President Trump during the campaign.

Jankowicz also defended Biden’s handling of Ukraine, despite Russian President Vladimir Putin invading the country during his presidency.

She argued that Trump would have been “much worse” than Biden.

Psaki said the DHS Disinformation Board under Jankowicz would “coordinate ongoing work that is happening” online from the Department.

She also said the board will focus on “things that would incite violence extremism” as well as human trackers and transnational criminals, malign foreign influence, or information endangering people during emergencies.

“A lot of this work is really about work that people may not see every day that’s ongoing by the Department of Homeland Security,” she said.

When asked how DHS would identify “extremist” groups, Jen Psaki said she did not know told reporters to question the Department of Homeland Security.

Only Internet Fascism Can Save Democracy

Won’t someone save democracy from the people?

19 comments

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical Left and Islamic terrorism.

Free speech on the internet endangers democracy, Barack Obama told Stanford University.

The widely hailed speech at Big Tech’s favorite university claimed that autocrats are "subverting democracy" and that democracies have "grown dangerously complacent". In the slow parade of teleprompter cliches he even  warned that "too often we've taken freedom for granted."

To Obama, the threat to democracy doesn’t come from government power, but the lack of it.

“You just have to flood a country’s public square with enough raw sewage. You just have to raise enough questions, spread enough dirt, plant enough conspiracy theorizing that citizens no longer know what to believe. Once they lose trust in their leaders, in mainstream media, in political institutions, in each other, in the possibility of truth, the game’s won,” he summed up.

Like every Obama speech, “Challenges to Democracy in the Digital Information Realm” didn’t offer anything new, just a distillation of familiar talking points and misplaced assumptions.

The assumption at the heart of Obama’s speech and that of the range of arguments depicting free speech as a cultural and national threat is that the purpose of discourse is state power.

Obama, like many post-liberal lefty critics of free speech, reduces speech to its social impact and its social impact to its political impact. This holistic integration is so fundamental to Marxists and many lefties that they don’t even think twice about the idea that everything we do is reducible to a move on the great abacus of social justice. The food you eat, the car you buy, and the words you say have the potential to either save or damn the planet and humanity.

This quasi-religious conception of mass social mobilization pervades American society. It’s the precondition for wokeness because the only possible moral justification for terrorizing random people on social media is the conviction that governance isn’t political, it’s social, and that the only way to avert climate change and social inequality is by controlling what everyone believes.

Wokeness collapses the distinction between the private and public spheres, and between government and individuals. In a national social crisis, the only conceptual framework through which the Left ever really governs, there’s no time for such liberal niceties as private spheres.

Obama’s speech neatly illustrates the fascism at the heart of this panopticon political project.

Introduce disagreement and you “raise enough questions” that people “no longer know what to believe” and then “lose trust in their leaders”, “mainstream media” and even “truth”. Stripped of all the Brookings Institute globalist prose, what Obama is really saying is that individual disagreement undermines the state. And that truth is dependent on public faith in the state.

This is a value system utterly at odds with the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, one which envisions an intimate link between individual speech and state authority that would have horrified King George III, but absolutely delighted Hitler or Stalin.

It assumes that there can be no other legitimate points of view other than the official one and that there should be no leaders except those who share them. Limiting the range of opinions is necessary to protect state power because there is no distinction between them and the state.

Or as a certain Austrian artist once put it, "One people, One state, One leader".

When he was promoting his last book two years ago, Obama made the same arguments. "If we do not have the capacity to distinguish what’s true from what’s false, then by definition the marketplace of ideas doesn’t work. And by definition our democracy doesn’t work."

The assumption that the democratic process leads to truth rather than choice, absolute rightness rather than people power, is an undemocratic paradigm. Its inevitable conclusion becomes that of Obama, that democracy must be protected by controlling the people.

Not only elections, but ideas, are too important to be left to the public.

Obama doesn’t want a marketplace of ideas because people might get the wrong idea and vote him and his political allies out of office. The explicit goal of internet censorship is to control election outcomes by filtering what information the public is able to access.

Like the provenance of a certain Delaware artist’s laptop.

Narrowing the range of acceptable information in order to narrow the range of acceptable opinions, candidates and political systems is the first fundamental trick of tyrannies. It takes a certain chutzpah and a stock of Orwellian buzzwords to redefine that as protecting democracy.

Obama complains, "China’s built a great firewall around the Internet, turning it into a vehicle for domestic indoctrination" and proposes a democratic firewall around the internet under a "regulatory structure" to be designed with "communities of color" to slow "the spread of harmful content." The democratic people of color firewall will be so much better than China’s firewall.

Pro-censorship elites have the same assumptions as China about the interaction between speech, society, and the state which is why they, like Obama, arrive at the same conclusions. They can dress up those conclusions in buzzwords about “democracy” and “people of color”, but those are differences of style, not substance. The trains all end up at the same station.

Obama speaks about “bugs” in the Constitution. While he is always happy to critique America, the particular totalitarian bug here is deeply embedded into the leftist worldview which denies that people have individual agency, insists that everyone is a prisoner of their social context, and contends that the purpose of the society and the state is an enlightened intertwining. The bug, which is really more of a feature, directly leads to the same outcome as in China or Stanford.

A free society requires healthy breathing spaces between politics and life.The difference between a politicized society and a tyranny is only time. The question at the heart of this debate is “What is discourse for” which is really the question of, “What are people here for?” To believe, as the Left does, that people primarily exist as vehicles for political change is to enslave them.

That’s why every leftist revolution invariably slides toward tyranny along the same worn tracks.

The Founding Fathers believed that people would self-define their purposes. That was why America’s revolution uniquely led to freedom and why leftist revolutions lead to tyranny.

America defined freedom as individual power while lefties define it by the power of the state.

Obama is simply replaying what happens when liberation is treated as a collective enterprise, a journey toward rather than from, that can only be achieved collectively, through the exercise of state power rather than individually through personal choices. The internet, once individualistic, has become collective, and social media, the ultimate embodiment of that collectivism, has become the battleground between individualist expressers and collectivist censors.

No comments: