Mark Levin: Why do Democrats hate America?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pllML6OQRLk
The level of 'corruption' in our government is 'unacceptable': JD Vance
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpa0w4A87Ao
BLOG EDITOR: The biggest war profiteer in modern American history is Sen. Dianne
Feinstein who also ranks as one of the most corrupt. It was Feinstein who quickly endorsed
Biden's third big for the presidency for obvious reasons.
WE CAN'T FIX OUR OWN COUNTRY OR DEFEND OUR OWN BORDERS
FROM THE NARCOMEX DRUG CARTELS AND YET WE HAVE TROOPS
SCATTERED ALL OVER THE GLOBE!
Another is that president Biden, the “border czar” Kamala
Harris and the head of the Department of Homeland Security,
Mayorkas haven’t noticed there are a lot more dead bodies at the
southern border under Biden than there were under
Trump. RICHARD McDONOUGH
Our military is for defense; it’s not a galivanting righter of wrongs. We haven’t enough challenges at home? Our cities are increasingly lawless. Big, Democrat-run cities might as well be called war zones. We don’t have a border that’s been blown wide open by Biden administration policy?
J. ROBERT SMITH
There are certainly no calls for diplomacy and peaceful resolutions in
Washington, D.C. Not from the Biden administration, not from
Congress, not from mainline defense and foreign policy thinktanks.
Not in corporate media. Instead, relentless belligerence. A march
toward war is their way. J. ROBERT SMITH
I can no longer remain in today’s Democratic Party that is now under the complete control of an elitist cabal of warmongers driven by cowardly wokeness, who divide us by racializing every issue and stoke anti-white racism, actively work to undermine our God-given freedoms, are hostile to people of faith and spirituality, demonize the police and protect criminals at the expense of law-abiding Americans, believe in open borders, weaponize the national security state to go after political opponents, and above all, dragging us ever closer to nuclear war. TULSI GABBARD
Tulsi’s Declaration of Independence
I can no longer remain in today’s Democratic Party that is under the complete control of an elitist cabal of warmongers driven by cowardly wokeness, who divide us by racializing every issue & stoke anti-white racism. … Unfortunately, today's Democratic Party … stands for a government that is of, by and for the powerful elite. -- Tulsi Gabbard, Tweet, Oct. 11, 2022
Rumble video screengrab
Just as Tulsi Gabbard (Iraq War Veteran, former Democrat Rep. Hawaii, 2nd District, popular 2016 Democrat Presidential candidate) was explaining that she was leaving the Democrat party because of its “cowardly wokeness” that “racializes every issue” and divides Americans, former President Barack Obama was speaking to Europeans at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit in a closed door session and racializing the fact that many Republicans have the audacity to disagree with him,
Sometimes, it just turns out they’re mean, they’re racist, they’re sexist, they’re angry. Your job is to just beat them because they’re not persuadable … Sometimes we get filled up in our own self-righteousness. We’re so convinced we’re right that we forget what we are right about.
Well, he’s right about one thing. The Democrats are nothing if not “self-righteous”. That is part of Tulsi’s point. Self-righteousness is not the best mental state for achieving a fair and balanced grasp of the issues. It is, however, a good foundation for calling people names who commit the unforgivable sin of thinking for themselves.
In fact, self-righteous people are often projecting (in the psychological sense) their own negative characteristics on others. A person (or Party) that is angry, sexist, racist and unpersuadable (obstinate dogmatism) will tend to see anger, sexism and racism and obstinate dogmatism in others. Projecting one’s own sins on others is a useful tool for refusing to face one’s own shortcomings. The implicit argument is simple: “Since I hyperventilate [virtue-signal] about sexism, racism and implacable dogmatism in others I obviously cannot be a sexist or racist or dogmatist myself.” Very useful fallacy for bigots!
It is easy to see why Democrats are self-righteously unwilling to examine themselves. The Democrat party has a long history, stretching right up to the present, of systematic racism. Recently, a Los Angeles Latino Democrat, Nury Martinez and two others, were caught on a leaked tape from a “closed door” meeting comparing a two-year old black child to a “monkey,” saying, in a prima facia call for violence against the child, that he needs a “beat down”. Kevin De Leon stated that the child, who has two gay white parents, carry him around like a “handbag”. Anti-Semitic and anti-Armenian insults, including the statement that the “Jews cut their deal with South L.A.” and “are going to screw everybody else,” were, accompanied by laughter. Indigenous people from Oaxaca were described as “little, short, dark ... ugly ... people”. Martinez also said “F--- that guy. He’s with the blacks.” These members of “the inclusive Party” denigrated black people, including a two-year old child, gay people, Jews and little dark ugly indigenous people in record time. Despite the carefully choreographed theatrics the mask sometimes slips off and the what’s underneath is not pretty.
None of this is surprising to conservatives, who are used to being accused of hate, racism and sexism by hateful, racist and sexist people on the Left simply for wanting, in keeping with American tradition, to have free and fair discussions about serious social issues. Conservative actor, James Woods, who has an impressive film portfolio, and whose IQ is allegedly 184 (definitely have to get rid of him), states that he and other conservative actors are blacklisted in Hollywood. Woods, a fine actor, cannot even be allowed to work in his profession. The pettiness of “liberals” is directly proportional to their self-righteousness.
In fact, there are many reasons that have nothing to do with hate, anger, racism, sexism or dogmatism that, back in the old days before everything became cowardly and woke, used to be called “objective reasons” why one might oppose Democrat policies. Perhaps Obama hasn’t noticed these because they are not visible from the massive 30-acre, massive carbon footprint oceanfront mansion in his mostly white, safe, definitely Venezuelan-free Martha’s Vineyard.
One of them is that under Democrat control of both elected branches of government, inflation has gone from 1.4% when they took over in Jan. 2020 to about 8.5% now (a 40-year high). Another is that president Biden, the “border czar” Kamala Harris and the head of the Department of Homeland Security, Mayorkas haven’t noticed there are a lot more dead bodies at the southern border under Biden than there were under Trump. So-called “border czar” Harris has not even managed to make it to the border but she did fly to E Paso for a photo-op when she found out that Trump was going to the border.
Another is that Biden’s precipitous withdrawal from Afghanistan led to 13 US military blown to bits and a hundred more injured (not to mention the hundreds of Afghans killed and injured).
Another is that soon after Biden said that a little incursion by Russia into Ukraine might not be too bad, Russia invaded Ukraine leading to massive deaths and worldwide economic dislocation.
Another is that North Korea has resumed its nuclear weapons and ballistic missile programs, all suspended under Trump, and begun firing ballistic missiles over Japanese territory again.
Another is that crime and homicides are “skyrocketing” across the US due to the Democrats’ absurd district attorneys and “Defund the Police” movement.
Another is that Biden has destroyed the US oil and natural gas industry.
Another is that the Biden administration shamelessly lies about things, the most recent being the lie that the Border Patrol were whipping the migrants who were trying to enter the country illegally.
Another is that after promising to unite the country Biden is now calling half the country “semi-fascists”.
Another is that even though the Democrats are in charge of everything they refuse to take responsibility for anything Everything is Trump’s fault, Putin’s fault or the oil industry’s fault or your fault! Everything is politics to Democrats who use “any means necessary” to get their way.
That is what Tulsi was talking about. Got it now Obama?
The Madness of America’s Ruling Class
The ruling class has failed immensely. The last two years are proof, but with each passing day, one wonders: Are America’s elites plunging into madness? That’s a dead serious question. With their madness may go our lives. That’s dead serious, too.
Joe Biden spoke the other day about the possibility of nuclear “Armageddon.” With cataclysm in mind, Biden’s Department of Health and Human Services spent $290 million on anti-radiation drugs. Uncle Sam makes plenty of wasteful expenditures, but is this one?
Said our doddering president, AP, October 7:
Speaking at a Democratic fundraiser, Biden said Thursday night that Russian President Vladimir Putin is “a guy I know fairly well” and the Russian leader is “not joking when he talks about the use of tactical nuclear weapons or biological or chemical weapons.”
Is Biden sounding the alarm to try to rally Americans and stave off midterm election losses for congressional Democrats? Crass politics from Biden wouldn’t surprise, yet…
Jordan Schachtel, writing at The Dossier on Substack, says that Volodymyr Zelensky’s call to bomb Russia (now being walked back by the Ukrainian government) has no support from NATO.
But what if a direct attack on Russia isn’t what ignites major conflict with the Russians?
Retired General Jack Keane, a regular on Fox News programs, appeared on “Fox & Friends” last Friday. Keane is a war hawk. He’s pushed for a more aggressive U.S. military posture in Ukraine since the Russian invasion.
Keane said that if Putin uses tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine, the U.S. would have to respond. No other choice. Not in kind, mind you, but conventionally with a “comprehensive air and military attack” inside Ukraine. The aim would be to destroy the Russian army there. Putin loses, says Keane. But what he omits matters greatly.
If the U.S. strikes at the Russians in Ukraine, what assurance does Keane have that the war stays there, particularly if the U.S. is trying to annihilate the Russian army? There’s no risk of Putin expanding the war throughout Europe and to the U.S.? Russian missiles can’t reach America? Russian saboteurs can’t, for example, enter the U.S. -- if they aren’t here already -- and wreak havoc? Maybe take out power grids?
If Putin loses his army in Ukraine, his regime likely collapses. That’s what the ruling class wants. What that destabilization does to Russia and how that may adversely impact the rest of the world isn’t discussed.
Hillary Clinton and NATO grandees had no problem engineering Moammar Qaddafi’s killing. Libya has been torn by strife ever since. Acknowledging the possible consequences of destabilizing Putin’s regime may only make Americans more wary of being dragged into conflict.
If Putin is a goner, what does he have to lose by broadening the war? Why would the Biden administration gamble by attacking the Russian army in Ukraine?
Keane was never asked those questions by Fox News’ Brian Kilmeade. Regardless, there’s an underlying conceit about wanting to topple Putin. The conceit: war will be contained to Ukraine. A desperate Vladimir Putin would never escalate the conflict. Why worry? Yet two nations armed to the teeth with nuclear weapons have never warred. American military engagement in Ukraine is fraught with many perils. Disaster spreading well beyond Ukraine’s borders is realistic. If not, why buy hundreds of millions of dollars in anti-radiation meds?
Some say Putin’s back is to the wall, or near enough. The war hasn’t resolved as he hoped. Yet, one must account for the fog of war and propaganda, which makes war foggier.
Putin has announced the annexation of Ukrainian territory: Luhansk and Donetsk (republics) and two areas in southern Ukraine, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia. All are under Russian control. The spin that Putin is losing may just be spin. Col. Douglas Macgregor, a dissenting voice and a regular guest on Tucker Carlson’s show, thinks so.
Who trusts “U.S. intelligence sources” (Deep State) and corporate media anymore? We hear that American intelligence is backdooring Russian generals. Putin is hamstrung, unable to unilaterally use nuclear weapons. We’re to believe this based on unidentified sources?
Having been misled by U.S. intelligence about “weapons of mass destruction” in Iraq and given virtually no heads up about the looming defeat in Afghanistan last year, we shouldn’t be skeptical?
Biden speaks casually of Armageddon. Armageddon because of a localized conflict. Let that sink in. A war where no vital American interest is at risk. A war that’s limited to Ukraine and poses no threat to the homeland. A war, though, that the ruling class and military-industrial complex conflates with U.S. security.
Why? Because of mindsets that are trapped in the Cold War. Why? Because Democrats have made Russia a whipping boy. Democrats, who pawn off lies about Trump’s collusion with Russia to fix U.S. elections (Democrats don’t need Russians for that). Why? Because conflict is how the war industry ups profits.
A war that apologists for increased American and NATO military engagement have claimed is required to “protect democracy.” That’s a dubious claim, given that democracy and our rights are under assault here. Dubious because of Ukraine’s extensive corruption and checkered history with democracy.
Are we ready to sacrifice our sons and daughters for an abstraction? Do we dare court bringing destruction to our shores? Innocent American blood must be spilled to “make the world safe for democracy?” Is Ukraine really the hill that Lord knows how many Americans must die on?
When will we as a nation jettison Wilsonian sanctimony for a return to Washingtonian sensibility? Our military is for defense; it’s not a galivanting righter of wrongs. We haven’t enough challenges at home? Our cities are increasingly lawless. Big, Democrat-run cities might as well be called war zones. We don’t have a border that’s been blown wide open by Biden administration policy?
If our military is to engage, deploy it along the U.S.-Mexican border -- or what’s rumored to be a border. That’s where the real threat to America’s welfare and security lies. 4.5 million illegals have entered our country, bringing crime, fentanyl, illness, and poverty. Cartels menace. More “migrants” come daily. And who knows how many enemy agents are among the diaspora?
Edging toward war with Russia is eerily reminiscent of World War I’s beginning, though this time substitute Ukraine for Serbia. History may not repeat itself, but it can approximate.
Anyone with a basic understanding of WWI knows that it was pure folly. It squandered tens of millions of lives and devastated Western and Central Europe -- without nuclear weapons. It gave rise to communist Russia, opened the way for fascism, spawned WWII, and finished with the Cold War. Austria needn’t have attacked Serbia because of the assassinations of Archduke Ferdinand and his wife, Sophie. Redress there had to be, but Austria’s aggression set off a chain reaction.
The Germans, Russians, French, and English could have pushed for restraint… could have sought to mediate, insisting that Gavrilo Princip and his fellow conspirators be dealt swift justice while keeping Serbia free from Austrian reprisals. Yet, the great powers followed their respective allies into war, automatically. WWI set in motion the decline of Europe, a decline that continues.
Do we hear calls among the ruling class for American diplomacy to end hostilities in Ukraine? Where are the peacemakers? Ending hostilities would entail recognizing Russia’s legitimate security concerns (NATO advancing again to Russia’s border) and acceptance that Ukraine be nonaligned, though free from Russian domination.
There are certainly no calls for diplomacy and peaceful resolutions in Washington, D.C. Not from the Biden administration, not from Congress, not from mainline defense and foreign policy thinktanks. Not in corporate media. Instead, relentless belligerence. A march toward war is their way.
Madness? You bet. If the madness isn’t checked, it’s we the American people who’ll pay a most horrific price.
J. Robert Smith can be found regularly at Gab @JRobertSmith. He also blogs at Flyover.
WAR PROFITEER DIANNE FEINSTEIN SUCKS OFF BRIBES AND DEALS SIPHONED THROUGH HER PIMP-HUSBAND RICHARD BLUM FROM THE FOLLOWING:
https://twitter.com/philosophrob/status/1099103180552654848
1. Wells Fargo (Banking)
2. Northrop Grumman (Defense)
3. Bank of America (Banking)
4. General Atomics (Defense)
5. General Dynamics (Defense)
SEN. DIANNE FEINSTEIN RANKS AS ONE OF THE MOST CORRUPT AND SELF-SERVING POLITICIANS IN AMERICAN HISTORY.
SHE HAS AMASSE A STAGGERING FORTUNE AS SHE STALKED THE HALLS OF CONGRESS SNIFFING OUT DEALS THAT SHE AND BARBARA “BRIBES” BOXER VOTED ON THAT DROPPED HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS INTO THE POCKETS OF FEINSTEIN’S PIMP-HUSBAND RICHARD BLUM
BLUM HAS HANDED OUT CAMPAIGN “CONTRIBUTIONS” BRIBES TO VIRTUALLY ALL MAJOR DEM POLS SO THEY KEEP THEIR MOUTHS CLOSED ABOUT FEINSTEIN’S STAGGERING CORRUPTION.
FEINSTEIN HAS VOTED AGAINST ALL SENATE ATTEMPTS TO CURB SIPHONING OFF BRIBES TO FAMILY MEMBERS IN THE FORM OF “CONSULTANT” FEES.
BARBARA “BRIBES” BOXER MADE A VAST FORTUNE SHE SIPHONED OVER TO HER SON, OAKLAN LAWYER DOUG BOXER.
PELOSI HAS SIPHONED OFF BRIBES TO HER HUSBAND. AND THEN THERE ARE THE BACK ROOM DEALS BLUM MADE TO PROFIT ON FEINSTEIN’S RED CHINA CONNECTIONS.
JUST FOLLOW THE MONEY AS THESE TRAITORS DESTROY OUR COUNTRY AND FILL THEIR POCKETS DOING IT!
SENATOR DIANNE FEINSTEIN: I got rich, really, rich, selling out my country as my husband/pimp paid out bribes to other DEM POLS so they would keep their mouths closed about our corruption!
https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2019/07/she-ranks-as-one-of-most-corrupt-and.html
*
IN THE November 2006 election, the voters demanded congressional ethics reform. And so, the newly appointed chairman of the Senate Rules Committee, Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., is now duly in charge of regulating the ethical behavior of her colleagues. But for many years, Feinstein has been beset by her own ethical conflict of interest, say congressional ethics experts.
“All in all, it was an incredible victory for the Chinese government. Feinstein has done more for Red China than other any serving U.S. politician. “ Trevor Loudon
“Our entire crony capitalist system, Democrat and Republican alike, has become a kleptocracy approaching par with third-world hell-holes. This is the way a great country is raided by its elite.” ---- Karen McQuillan AMERICAN THINKER.com
A SEARCH FOR FEINSTEIN AND WAR PROFITEER
Search Results
Web results
freepress.org › article › dianne-feinstein-war-profiteer-and-war-criminal
Dianne Feinstein: War profiteer and war criminal | Freepress.org
1.
Jul 5, 2013 - Dianne Feinstein: War profiteer and war criminal ... Senator Feinstein has been quick to be at the forefront of defending these programs and ...
original.antiwar.com › joshua-frank › 2006/02/28 › senator-feinsteins...
Senator Feinstein's War Profiteering - Antiwar.com Original
1.
Feb 28, 2006 - If the antiwar movement takes on the Democrats for their bitter shortcomings, a few liberals are bound to criticize us for not hounding Bush instead. ... According to the Center for Public Integrity, Feinstein’s husband Richard Blum has racked in millions of dollars from Perini, a ...
original.antiwar.com › justin › 2009/10/11 › dianne-feinstein-war-pro...
Dianne Feinstein: War Profiteer - Antiwar.com Original
1.
Oct 11, 2009 - Dianne Feinstein: War Profiteer. Justin Raimondo ... A particularly brazen example of the latter is Sen. Dianne Feinstein, Democrat of California ...
www.dailykos.com › story
Feinstein Family War Profits - Daily Kos
1.
May 11, 2006 - Senator Dianne Feinstein's husband, Richard Blum, could well be called ... ties and war profiteering, as it did in Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11, then ... senator's spouse gleaning off the spoils of war and passing it along to ...
www.dailykos.com › story
Senator Feinstein - War Profiteer by Marriage. - Daily Kos
1.
Feb 28, 2006 - Is this the kind of Democrat we want serving us? We already have Lieberman, Biden, Dodd and a host of other DINOs. It's about time for ...
www.lewrockwell.com › 2007/04 › joshua-frank › sen-feinstein-as-a-...
Sen. Feinstein as a Merchant of Death - LewRockwell
1.
Apr 4, 2007 - Democratic Blood Money and Senator Feinstein's War Profiteering ... Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein of California silently resigned from ...
www.sfgate.com › news › article › Army-contract-for-Feinstein-s-hus...
Army contract for Feinstein's husband / Blum is a director of ...
1.
Apr 22, 2003 - URS Corp., a San Francisco planning and engineering firm partially owned by California Sen. Dianne Feinstein's husband, landed an Army ...
dissidentvoice.org › Apr07 › Frank05
Democratic Blood Money and Senator Feinstein's War ...
1.
Apr 5, 2007 - Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein of California silently resigned ... Here's a brief rundown of the Feinstein family's blatant war profiteering.
dissidentvoice.org › Mar06 › Frank01
(DV) Frank: Senator Feinstein's War Profiteering
1.
Senator Feinstein's War Profiteering by Joshua Frank www.dissidentvoice.org. March 1, 2006. Send this page to a friend! (click here). It happens all the time.
theintercept.com › 2015/09/25 › dianne-feinstein-husband-threaten-u...
The Greatest Threat to Campus Free Speech is Coming From ...
1.
2.
Sep 25, 2015 - ... about Israel that Dianne Feinstein and her war-profiteering husband ... Illinois Democratic Senator Dick Durbin — is merely illustrative of this ...
Page 2 of about 28,100 results (0.42 seconds)
Search Results
Web results
www.sanjoseinside.com › 2015/07/16 › sen-dianne-feinsteins-husban...
Sen. Dianne Feinstein's Husband, Richard Blum, Grows Fortune
1.
Jul 16, 2015 - Richard Blum, husband of U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein, has ... has a $50,000–$100,000 investment in Colony American Homes War I and no ...
www.fogcityjournal.com › lt_code_pink_feinstein_070409
Code Pink, Raging Grannies ask Feinstein to return profits to ...
1.
Apr 9, 2007 - of corruption and war profiteering. Feinstein releases statement ... Senator Dianne Feinstein and Richard C. Blum. Feinstein has since broken ...
www.theguardian.com › commentisfree › mar › cia-double-life-diann...
The CIA: the double life of Dianne Feinstein | Editorial ...
1.
Mar 11, 2014 - Editorial: The exasperation with the Democratic senator from California is that she hasn't also directed her outrage at the NSA.
underground.net › birds-eye-view › war-profiteering
War Profiteering – Underground Network
1.
2.
War profiteers are people, corporations, or any actors that profit from war. ... US Senator Dianne Feinstein, who voted in favor of the Iraq Resolution, and her ...
www.democraticunderground.com › discuss › duboard
Sen Dianne Feinstein's Husband Top Iraq War Profiteer - Democratic ...
1.
Jul 24, 2008 - 32 posts - 28 authors
That's because Blum's wife, Senator Dianne Feinstein, appears to have used her seat on the Military Construction Appropriations subcommittee ...
en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Dianne_Feinstein
Dianne Feinstein - Wikipedia
1.
2.
Dianne Goldman Berman Feinstein is an American politician serving as the senior United ... At the age of 86, Feinstein is the oldest sitting U.S. Senator. ... committee has coincided with the Senate Report on Pre-war Intelligence on Iraq and the ...
Political party: Democratic
Children: Katherine
Education: Stanford University (BA)
Constituency: At-large district (1970–1978); 2nd ...
Missing: profiteers | Must include: profiteers
en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Political_positions_of_Dianne_Feinstein
Political positions of Dianne Feinstein - Wikipedia
1.
2.
Dianne Feinstein is the current senior senator in the U.S. Senate representing California. ... Feinstein supported the Iraq war resolution in the vote of October 11, 2002; she has since claimed that she was misled by President Bush on the ...
Political party: Democratic
Missing: profiteers | Must include: profiteers
books.google.com › books
Censored 2009: The Top 25 Censored Stories of 2007-08
Peter Phillips, Andy Lee Roth, Project Censored - 2011 - Political Science
And in December 2007, Judicial Watch ranked Senator Feinstein as one of ... Sources “The Diane Feinstein War Profiteering Scandal,” Rush Limbaugh, ...
books.google.com › books
The Economics of War: Profiteering, Militarism and Imperialism
Imad A. Moosa - 2019 - Political Science
Profiteering, Militarism and Imperialism Imad A. Moosa ... (2003) has reported that US senator Dianne Feinstein, who voted in favour of the invasion of Iraq, and ...
books.google.com › books
Kissinger's Shadow: The Long Reach of America's Most ...
Greg Grandin - 2015 - Biography & Autobiography
Iran-Contra and Senator John Kerry's hearings on the CIA's use of drug ... activities in Nicaragua, and now to Senator Dianne Feinstein's torture report, and the ... the press; Blackwater; Abu Ghraib; war profiteering; the torture memos; drones.
Page 3 of about 24 results (0.37 seconds)
Search Results
Web results
books.google.com › books
Combating War Profiteering: Are We Doing Enough to ...
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 2007 - Contracting out
Hearing Before the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One ... Jr., Delaware HERB KOHL, Wisconsin DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California RUSSELL ...
www.indybay.org › uploads › 2015/12/10 › feinstein_corruption_1.2...
The Corruption of Senator Feinstein - Indybay
1.
2.
PDF
Dec 10, 2015 - Sen. Dianne Feinstein's husband wins CA rail contract . ... The Feinsstein Family held war profiteering contracts in Afghanistan, Bolivia and ...
www.rushlimbaugh.com › daily › 2007/03/29 › the_dianne_feinstein...
The Dianne Feinstein War Profiteering Scandal - The Rush ...
1.
Mar 29, 2007 - The Dianne Feinstein War Profiteering Scandal. Mar 29 ... 'Sen. Dianne Feinstein has resigned from the Military Construction Appropriations ...
Images for sen. dianne feinstein war profiteers
View all
More images for sen. dianne feinstein war profiteersReport images
Web results
www.paloaltoonline.com › square › 2008/02/24 › diane-feinsteins-co...
Diane Feinstein's Conflict of Interest in Iraq | Town Square ...
1.
Feb 24, 2008 - Shortly before my expose of Senator Dianne Feinstein's conflict of interest was published in January ... Blum & Feinstein - Corrupt War Profiteer
www.wnd.com › 2007/03
Feinstein quits committee under war-profiteer cloud - WND
1.
Mar 28, 2007 - Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., has abruptly walked away from her responsibilities with the Senate Military Construction Appropriations ...
dyncorp.wordpress.com › 2009/10/12 › dianne-feinstein-war-profiteer
Dianne Feinstein: War Profiteer | Dyncorp Sucks
1.
Oct 12, 2009 - A particularly brazen example of the latter is Sen. Dianne Feinstein, Democrat of California and formerly the mayor of what is generally ...
nymag.com › intelligencer › 2020/01 › lev-parnas-on-maddow-trump-k...
Lev Parnas on Maddow: Trump Knew 'Exactly What Was ...
2 days ago - “It was never about corruption,” Parnas said, referring to the unreliable Trump-team claim that the administration wanted to go after profiteering ...
www.youtube.com › watch
How to Profit Off War: Iraq, Afghanistan and Big-Money ...
1.
2.
Jan 18, 2015 - A war profiteer is any person or organization that profits from warfare or by selling weapons and other goods to parties at war. The term has ...
No comments:
Post a Comment