BIDENOMICS OF OPEN BORDER: WIDESPREAD STAGGERING POVERTY FOR LEGALS!
WHERE ARE THE FUKING JOBS? THEY ALL GO TO 'CHEAP' LABOR ILLEGALS. PAY A VISIT TO MEXIFORNIA TO SEE FOR YOURSELF!
IMAGES OF AMERICA UNDER LA RAZA
MEX OCCUPATION:
Your neighborhood will be next to fall to LA RAZA!
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2013/10/america-la-raza-mexicos-wide-open.html
VIDEOS
this is a travelogue of NAFTA, perpetrated by Billary Clinton and then Sen Joe Biden.
GET PREPARED! THIS IS WHAT AMERICA WILL BE LIKE
AFTER THE BANKSTERS AND WALL STREET COMPLETE
THEIR NEXT WAVE OF PLUNDER UNDER BIDENOMICS!
WHERE ARE THE FUKING JOBS? THEY ALL GO TO 'CHEAP' LABOR ILLEGALS. PAY A VISIT TO MEXIFORNIA TO SEE FOR YOURSELF!
I Went To The Worst Place In Arkansas
WHERE ARE THE FUKING JOBS? THEY ALL GO TO 'CHEAP' LABOR ILLEGALS. PAY A VISIT TO MEXIFORNIA TO SEE FOR YOURSELF!
I Went To The Saddest Place In The United States
WHERE ARE THE FUKING JOBS? THEY ALL GO TO 'CHEAP' LABOR ILLEGALS. PAY A VISIT TO MEXIFORNIA TO SEE FOR YOURSELF!
New Orleans Is Broken And Crumbling. Can It Be Saved?
WHERE ARE THE FUKING JOBS? THEY ALL GO TO 'CHEAP' LABOR ILLEGALS. PAY A VISIT TO MEXIFORNIA TO SEE FOR YOURSELF!
.jpg)
WATCH: Karine Jean-Pierre Struggles To Explain Why Biden Is Sending Troops to the 'Secure' Border
White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre struggled to explain why the Biden administration needs to deploy troops to the border that she has described as "secure."
"Because we need more work. We need more—work needs to be done," Jean-Pierre said Tuesday when asked by Fox News reporter Peter Doocy why, if the border is secure, the administration is sending the military. "Republicans in Congress refused to act. ...We are putting ... forth processes to deal with the changes that are going to be ahead of us."
Jean-Pierre's attempt to downplay the administration's Tuesday decision to deploy 1,500 active-duty troops to the border ahead of an expected surge in migration this month came a day after she falsely claimed that "illegal immigration" has "come down by more than 90 percent." Illegal immigration actually hit a record-high in 2022 of 2.76 million encounters.
Jean-Pierre has repeatedly claimed the situation at the southern border is not out of control and said she agreed with Vice President Kamala Harris's claim that the border is "secure."
In spite of repeated assurances by Jean-Pierre, Harris, and Department of Homeland Security secretary Alejandro Mayorkas that the border is secure the administration plans to send 1,500 active duty troops to the border ahead of the expiration of Title 42, a pandemic-era rule that allows border agents to turn away migrants. The troops will assist agents with administrative duties, Politico reported, joining 2,500 National Guard troops already deployed at the border.
Kamala Harris: Medicare for All Includes
Illegal Aliens
https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2019/05/viva-la-raza-supremacy-hispandering.html
Harris, a guest on CNN's "State of the Union," said "I support Medicare for all. It is my preferred policy." She said she supports the bill introduced by Sen. Bernie Sanders.
Sending Troops to Border Is 'Inappropriate' and 'Political,' Said Veep Whose Boss Is Now Sending Troops to Border
Vice President Kamala Harris in a 2018 interview blasted the Trump administration's decision to send troops to the border as "political" and "inappropriate," remarks that may hurt her after news broke Tuesday that the Biden administration is sending 1,500 troops to the border.
"The administration made a decision to deploy [troops] based on a political agenda," then-senator Harris said, "and I believe that it is inappropriate to require the limited resources of the United States military to be used in such a way." She described the Trump administration's decision as "some demonstration for the TV cameras based on a political agenda instead of what is a national security threat."
Harris has not used similar language to describe the Biden administration's decision to deploy troops to the border. According to a Homeland Security Department memo, the Pentagon will send staff to manage an enormous expected surge on the southern border following the repeal of Title 42, a Trump administration border security measure, the Washington Free Beacon reported Tuesday. Defense Department officials confirmed the same day that the administration will send "1,500 active-duty troops to the U.S.-Mexico border in anticipation of an influx of migrants," according to CNN.
"The active-duty Army units will assist Border Patrol and will be armed," National Review reported. In addition to the Army, 2,500 active-duty National Guardsmen are already stationed at the border.
The Border Patrol, which last year faced a record-high number of encounters with illegal immigrants, may now have to deal with up to 15,000 migrants per day. By comparison, the whole month of March 2022 "saw an average of roughly 5,200 daily illegal border crossings," the Free Beacon reported. An unprecedented 5.5 million immigrants have already illegally crossed the border since Harris's boss, President Joe Biden, took office.
Harris, who is ostensibly in charge of managing the administration's response to the crisis, has only been to the border once, in June 2021. In January of this year, she visited the border state of Arizona but didn't discuss the crisis. Instead, she talked about green energy projects.
Even as the crisis worsens by the day, Biden administration officials, including Harris, have insisted that the border is secure. One day before the Pentagon confirmed the troop movement, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre falsely claimed that "illegal migration" has "come down by more than 90 percent."
Published under: Biden Administration , border , Border Crisis , Border Patrol , Illegal Immigration , Kamala Harris , Military , National Security , Pentagon , Title 42 , Trump Administration
Victor Davis Hanson: Joe Biden's regime is most revolutionary Left-wing since FDR
President Kamala
The most oppressed woman in America runs for president.
Biden’s announcement that he’s going to run for a second term was really Kamala’s campaign.
The ancient politico, who was born a little over a year after Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, would be 86 years old at the end of a hypothetical second term. It’s unlikely that Biden, who already seems confused during press conferences, has trouble walking up the stairs and spends much of his time away from the White House would be able to function throughout a second term.
“With regard to age, I can’t even say – I guess, how old I am – I can’t even say the number. It doesn’t register with me,” Biden recently blathered.
It registers with everyone else.
Before his campaign launch, Biden had the opportunity to pick a viable vice presidential candidate who might be ready to step into the job. Instead he doubled down on Kamala.
With approval ratings in the 30s, Kamala is even more unpopular than her boss. And that’s why he picked her. Biden may be failing but he cannily understood that his best defense against a 25th amendment scenario was a completely unacceptable vice president. Despite the expectations of many Republicans, Biden intends to cling to the office as long as possible.
But what happens when he can’t anymore?
Kamala isn’t just a face on the ticket the way that most vice presidential candidates are, she’s the presidential candidate. A second term for Biden is really a first term for Kamala.
That’s a problem not just for Republicans or Democrats, but for Americans.
Sent off to wave the bloody shirt on abortion, Kamala claimed that abortion pills had been legalized by the “federal drug administration”: a wholly imaginary agency. Prepping for a second term, she still doesn’t know what the FDA stands for or much of anything else about her job.
This is how all of Kamala’s public-facing appearances go.
The White House sends her out to take ownership of a core issue, immigration, international relations or abortion, she botches it with an unserious presentation and verbal flubs, and then her defenders blame racism and sexism.
Right on cue, Ron Klain, Biden’s ex-chief of staff, popped up to claim that “sexism and racism are part of the problem”.
They are, but not the way Klain meant. When Kamala wasted $36 million and dropped out without ever going through a single primary, she blamed racism and sexism.
“Is America ready for that? Are they ready for a woman of color to be President of the United States?” she demanded.
America may be ready, but Kamala isn’t. After a primary campaign in which she only gained traction by accusing her future boss of racism, she spent the election accusing Trump of racism and then spent her time in office accusing America of racism while her defenders blamed racism for her unpopularity. That’s not an original gimmick, but Kamala’s identity politics is defensive, not offensive. And that’s why not even the biggest wokes take her posturing seriously.
The most oppressed woman in America is running for president on the “poor me” platform.
All the whining about racism and sexism is pure deflection with nothing behind it. Kamala isn’t Obama. She’s not an activist and doesn’t have a vision. She’s a sorority girl and socialite from a wealthy family who’s well-connected, but not particularly bright and everyone in politics knows it. The only reason she got this far was California’s incestuous tangle of corrupt networks and identity politics which took her from being the girlfriend of one of the most crooked figures in San Francisco politics to being a heartbeat away from the presidency.
Along the way, Kamala has failed at every pre-presidential task, from running for office (her campaign dissolved into infighting between her sister and her staff before collapsing), running her vice presidential office (most of her key staffers have fled the sinking ship) and making her boss look good (she’s consistently had worse approval ratings making her a drag on the ticket.)
Despite constantly playing identity politics by reminding everyone that she’s sorta black, sorta Indian and probably a woman (assuming we can still define what that is), none of those groups like her. Biden performs better with black voters than Kamala does. That’s why he got the nomination and she didn’t. Despite Biden’s habit of sniffing and groping women, and accusations of sexual assault by a former Senate staffer, she performs only a little better with women than he does. Kamala still doesn’t have a base or anyone who really likes her.
Biden administration staffers spent years running her down anonymously to the media. Now they face the horrifying prospect that she might end up being their boss. That’s a problem she could have fixed. Hillary Clinton, who intended to be Obama’s successor, managed to build a relationship that took her to the nomination despite being a venomous and unlikable harridan. Kamala couldn’t manage to do it because she’s fundamentally inept at every basic political task.
All of this is fine for her current role as Biden’s human shield against the 25th Amendment. Like some medieval European monarchs, Biden has deliberately made such a hash of his succession that his staffers and the entire party will be forced to prop him up to avoid the horrifying disaster of a Kamala presidency. But does Biden envision having his presidency function like Feinstein or Fetterman’s hospitalizations? The Senate has allowed disabled Democrats to play this game, but the Constitution bars such presidential shenanigans.
And the commander in chief role is too important to be conducted from a hospital ward.
Biden’s decision to stick with Kamala is on par with the self-serving cynicism that governs all of his actions carried out for the sole goal of staying in power, but it’s spectacularly destructive in an non-ideological way. Biden has been slipping for a while and instead of gracefully stepping down, he’s clinging to power using every dirty trick only to hand that power over to someone he knows is unfit to serve because he chose her for that reason and kept her for that reason.
If Biden manages to get into office and survive a second term, Kamala’s career will be over. Her only shot will be for her boss to step down. Once a second term ends, there will be a long line of successors, beginning with Gov. Gavin Newsom and she won’t even have a shot at the job. The relationship between Kamala and the rest of the White House is bad now, imagine it in Year 6.
But what will she do if the most oppressed woman in the country becomes the most powerful?
The trouble with Kamala is her hollowness. And, unlike Biden, that hollowness isn’t just ideological, it extends throughout her entire being. Never has there been anyone this close to the presidency with no apparent skills, agenda or any purpose beyond checking boxes.
Given total power, Kamala will still botch everything, and then blame sexism and racism. But for the first time, her actions will have real consequences. And we may all end up paying the price.
Daniel Greenfield
Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical Left and Islamic terrorism.
Reader Interactions
GAMER LAWYERS BIDEN AND KAMALA AND THE PIG PARASITE LAWYER CLASS:
All of this is, if we can be permitted to use Biden’s catchphrase, “malarkey.” Harris has already proven herself as a trusted servant of the interests of the rich and powerful at the expense of the working class. The Wall Street Journal wrote last week that Wall Street financers had breathed a “sigh of relief” at Biden’s pick of Harris. Industry publication American Banker noted that her steadiest stream of campaign funding has come from financial industry professionals and their most trusted law firms.
Harris has often been described as a "politician on the make," someone who will do whatever is expedient. Writing for RealClearPolitics, Debra Saunders calls Harris a "progressive opportunist." Yves Smith, looking through her less than progressive record as California prosecutor, would alter that to "opportunist to the core." JEFFREY FOLKS
The best-case scenario is that she’s Kamala Harris) a progressive who repeatedly violated her own principles so that she could promote her career. In the worst-case scenario, she’s just another corrupt, rotten, regressive prosecutor. JESSER HOROWITZ
Joe Biden, the corrupt, unaccomplished 47-year career politician, with a reputation of having been a proud segregationist, an unabashed plagiarist and liar, a resolute tale-teller, and a serial flip-flopper, is pretending to head up a radical social-democratic ticket for President of the United States that includes as his running mate the ambitious, disagreeable junior senator from California: Kamala Harris.
Duplicity aside, perhaps the only details of Harris’s speech more cringeworthy than her insincerity was her inability to tell the truth about virtually anything. DAVID KELTZ
WATCH: Kamala Is ‘Essentially Running for President’ Given Biden’s Age, Says CNN Commentator
CNN contributor Van Jones said on-air Wednesday that Vice President Kamala Harris is "essentially running for president" in her 2024 reelection campaign with Joe Biden.
"She is in such an unusual position," Jones told anchor Michael Smerconish on CNN Primetime. "She's a woman. She's black. She's Asian. And she's running alongside the oldest person to ever do it. So she's essentially running for president. That's what she's doing. And I think people understand that."
Jones predicted that Harris—whose approval rating is even lower than Biden's and whose own 2020 presidential bid was a flop—will impress Americans once they see more of her.
"I just think sometimes if the team never really gives you the ball and lets you shoot your shot, you might underestimate that player," Jones said. "I expect people will become more and more impressed with her as she gets more and more opportunity. I don’t think she’s been given the opportunity in the last two years to shoot her shots."
"I think you will see her grow now that she has the opportunity," Jones added. "Everybody understands this is the oldest guy ever to run, so the VP matters a ton. She will be under more scrutiny, but I think she will also have more opportunity to prove herself."
Biden, 80, who announced Tuesday that he is running for reelection, would be 86 years old at the end of a second term. Already the oldest serving president in U.S. history, Biden has faced growing scrutiny of his unsteady public appearances and his limited and stage-managed interactions with the press.
Asked during a press conference Wednesday about concerns he is too old, Biden said, "I took a hard look at it before I decided to run, and I feel good and excited about the prospects."
Biden's choice to seek a second term, contrary to indications he gave in 2019, was reportedly influenced by his belief that Harris cannot defeat former president Donald Trump, the GOP presidential frontrunner.
THERE IS NO GREATER FRAUD IN AMERICA THAN PIG GAMER PARASITE SOCIOPATH LAWYER JOE BIDEN!
|
|
|
|
| Visit Website |
No comments:
Post a Comment