Tuesday, July 25, 2023

WHY IS INSIDE TRADER NANCY PELOSI STILL WORKING CONGRESS??? - Why is Nancy Pelosi Still in Congress? Where's the outrage from left-wing activists?

Why is Nancy Pelosi Still in Congress?

Where's the outrage from left-wing activists?

July 25, 2023 by Derek Hunter 7 Comments

Remember when Democrats lost the House and Nancy Pelosi announced she was no longer going to lead the Democrats, handing over leadership to New York Congressman Hakeem Jeffries? You have to remember it, Jeffries is black and that fact had Democrats and the media pleasuring themselves over how they’d selected a “historic” first. Well, it’s been a while now and you’d be hard-pressed to find anyone who doesn’t think old Nancy is still in charge of Democrats in the House. That begs the question, why is she still there?

The deal was Nancy Pelosi would stick around for a little while to help the new leadership team understand how the House works – something wildly condescending, if you think about it – then she would resign. Parties can only have one leader at a time, right?

Well, it’s been seven months and Nancy shows not only no sign of resigning, she shows no sign if giving up control of the Democrat caucus in the House.

I sign up for all the left-wing fundraising emails I can get, mostly because they’re absolutely hilarious. I challenge any sane person to read them without laughing hysterically while feeling a deep sense of despair that stupidity of this nature works on anyone in this country.

Putting that aside, once you’re on enough email lists you start getting emails from organizations you didn’t sign up for because politicians sell your contact information to each other, thinking if someone was a sucker for one candidate or cause they could easily become one for another. There’s a lot of money in it.

I suddenly started getting emails from Nancy Pelosi’s campaign. I never signed up for, why would I when she was stepping down? Not so fast.

Pelosi’s campaign is emailing more often than Hakeem Jeffries does, probably under her orders, so she can keep her hands on the cash and control where it goes. The person who controls the money is the one in charge, no matter what they signs on the doors say.

But it’s not just campaign cash, it’s the media too.

Jeffries gets his share of media hits on MSNBC and CNN, seemingly afraid to go anywhere else. But he is overshadowed in every way by Nancy Pelosi. She’s more important than he is, easily.

When Hakeem appears on TV he is “Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries,” when Nancy shows up she’s “Former Speaker of the House” or “Speaker Emeritus.” Which sounds more impressive to an audience?

Her existence blocks out his, easily.

Personally, I hate how former office holders maintain their titles. Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 of the Constitution states, “No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.”

I suppose an argument could be made that the second part means it only applies to foreign-granted titles, but the first part clearly states the US can’t grant any at all. We can argue all day over whether or not former position titles are akin to nobility, but they’ve been every bit as monetized as any royal title has.

Nevertheless, Nancy Pelosi remains in Congress and leader of the Democrats. Not de facto leader, but leader in everything but name.

Does Pelosi not trust a black man to do as good of a job as she thinks she did? If these were Republicans we are talking about the question would’ve at least been asked by now, multiple times per day by the very same Morning Joe crew who bows in affection with every Pelosi appearance.

But they don’t seem to even care when it’s one of their own; their dear leader. They fawn over her still, after having patted themselves on their backs for being a part of anointing a black man Democrat leader in the House.

Where is the outrage from the left-wing activists? Where is the anger directed toward the rich, old white lady who would only give up the ceremonial title of leadership but not the actual position and power?

Minnesota Attorney General and detestable racist Keith Ellison recently compared Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas to a house slave from the movie “Django Unchained” because Ellison views thinking for himself as some sort of sell-out. I wonder what Ellison thinks of being a public face of something while someone else is really running the show? Since they’re Democrats, Ellison probably doesn’t think anything of it. In the hive mind, everyone knows their place.

Pelosi, Whose Husband Traded Timely Stocks, Calls Justice Thomas Unethical

Paul Pelosi bought more than $1 million in Nvidia just before massive subsidies were voted on.

June 26, 2023 by Daniel Greenfield 22 Comments

Newsletter

Democrats, their advocacy groups, like ProPublica, and their media outlets, like the New York Times, have launched a dishonest campaign accusing conservative Supreme Court justices of being unethical.

These attacks are coming from some of the most corrupt and unethical figures and organizations in the country like ProPublica, created by the Sandler family whose greedy actions helped cause the previous recession led them to being profiled on Saturday Night Live as people who should be shot, not to mention a former Enron executive and FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried.

Now former Speaker Nancy Pelosi ducked out of her glass house to throw some pebbles.

Former Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said Sunday that it was “shameful” that Supreme Court Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas are so “cavalier” about ethics.

Speaking of cavaliers...

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi found herself in the center of a firestorm following one of her husband’s most recent stock purchases, but his stock purchases have caught the media’s attention and come under scrutiny for quite some time.

Pelosi’s latest headache ignited after her husband Paul, who owns a San Francisco investment and consulting firm, bought more than $1 million in Nvidia, a computer chip company, just weeks before a congressional vote that would provide massive subsidies to the industry.

During summer 2021, Paul cashed in on big tech shortly before the House Judiciary Committee voted to curtail the “unregulated power” of companies like Google and Amazon, Fortune reported. The move, however, wasn’t considered a threat to the companies, and the tech firms’ stock prices continued to rise.

Paul, meanwhile, had purchased 4,000 shares of Alphabet, Google’s parent company, by exercising call options a week before the vote. The call options – which give investors the right to buy shares of a company at a specific price – allowed him to snag the shares of Alphabet at $1,200 a piece as they closed that day at just over $2,500, according to Fortune. Paul earned $5.3 million on the investment at the time.

A few months before the Alphabet purchase, Paul picked up millions of dollars worth of Microsoft stock just days before the company announced a lucrative government contract.

Paul exercised call options and paid $1.95 million to buy 15,000 shares of Microsoft at a strike price of $130 on March 19, Fox Business reported. That same day, Paul paid $1.4 million for 10,000 shares valued at $140.

Microsoft announced a government contract worth nearly $22 billion to supply U.S. Army combat troops with augmented reality headsets just twelve days after Paul’s purchase, and the company’s share prices increased from about $230 to roughly $255 – or close to 11% – in the weeks following the announcement.

Ethics are for little people. And conservative Supreme Court justices. And certainly not for top Dems.

Daniel Greenfield

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical Left and Islamic terrorism.

Elon Musk Gets up and RIPS Nancy Pelosi to SHREDS, Evidence in showing Pelosi's Lies and Corruption!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qv19kmZw8lc

“Our job as elected officials is to serve the people — not ourselves,” the Virginia Democrat said in a statement on Friday.

Nancy Pelosi Sits in SILENCE as Lauren Boebert UNVEIL New Facts on her in Congress

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=49fs72UqZ6k

Watters: The Five (CRIME) Families of the Democrat Party

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BBpvvHethg0

Internet stock traders often follow Nancy Pelosi's purchases and selloffs for investing tips, Business Insider reported, with some suggesting "she's making the big bucks off of insider information."

Nancy Pelosi Sits in SILENCE as Lauren Boebert UNVEIL New Facts on her in Congress

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=49fs72UqZ6k

San Fran patrol special officer rips Pelosi's inaction over BLACK crime surge: She doesn't care

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SewBXWKj2g

SF Suffers Highest Rate of Car Break-Ins Compared to Atlanta, DC, Dallas, LA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTLPISB7xig

Among the 25 largest U.S. cities, San Francisco has had the highest property-crime rate in four of the most recent six years for which data is available, bucking the long-term national decline in such crimes that began in the 1990s. Property crimes declined in San Francisco during the first year of the pandemic, but rose 13% in 2021. Burglaries in the city are at their highest levels since the mid 1990s. There were 20,663 thefts from vehicles last year—almost 57 a day—a 39% increase from the prior year, although still below the record of 31,398 in 2017, according to the police. Zusha Elinson

Watters: The Five (CRIME) Families of the Democrat Party

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BBpvvHethg0

“Our entire crony capitalist system, Democrat and Republican alike, has become a kleptocracy approaching par with third-world hell-holes. This is the way a great country is raided by its elite.” Karen McQuillan

SAUDI DIRTY MONEY ENDS UP IN THE CLINTON FOUNDATION FAMILY SLUSH FUND

Jesse Watters: The Clintons' crooked connections

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnPSvkxKuLg

HOW MANY OF THESE PIGS ARE GAMER LAWYERS?

“Protect and enrich.” This is a perfect encapsulation of the Clinton (LAWYERS-2) Foundation and the (LAWYERS-2) Obama book and television deals. Then there is the Biden (LAWYERS-3) family corruption, followed closely behind by similar abuses of power and office by the (LAWYER) Warren and Sanders families, as Peter Schweizer described in his recent book “Profiles in Corruption.” These names just scratch the surface of government corruption (YOU CAN ADD LAWYER KAMALA HARRIS AND LAWYER CHUCK SCHUMER TO THE PATHEION OF DEMOCRAT BRIBES SUCKING CORRUPT LAWYER POLITICIANS!). BRIAN C JOONDEPH

One topic that Hillary is quick to criticize President Trump on is his relationship with Saudia Arabia. It’s ironic given the Clinton Foundation’s refusal to state that they will no longer accept financial donations from The Kingdom as others have.

the confessions of an inside trader: nancy pelosi