CUT AND PASTE YOUTUBE LINKS
Bidens don't seem to 'cover their tracks' in alleged China money web: Curley
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQkbnOO-mbM
SERVING RED CHINA: JOE BIDEN AT WORK
Biden admin is ‘enormously dangerous’ to the survival of America: Newt Gingrich
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dB8YNrfbD_E
Did Hunter Biden Sleep with a Chinese Spy?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kn83Uk9pX2k
Hunter Biden faces possible subpoena after missing deadline to turn over docs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K6hxjrGHJ8I
M y colleague Peter Schweizer’s runaway bestseller, Red Handed: How American Elites Get Rich Helping China Win, first revealed that the Biden family received some $31 million from the highest levels of Chinese intelligence at the same time Hunter was paying the vice president’s bills. Schweizer believes that there is a slam dunk case to indict Hunter Biden.
VIDEO
CUT AND PASTE YOUTUBE LINK
Watters: I guarantee you Satan went to law school
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6Ln2aXLqWw
THE BIDEN KLEPTOCRACY
American people deserve to know what China was up to with Joe Biden, especially when Beijing had already shelled out millions of dollars to Biden family members — including millions in set-asides for “the big guy.” What else is on that infamous Hunter Biden laptop? The conflicted Biden Justice Department cannot be trusted to engage in any meaningful oversight on this issue. We need a special counsel now.
TOM FITTON - JUDICIAL WATCH
Breitbart Political Editor Emma-Jo Morris’s investigative work at the New York Post on the Hunter Biden “laptop from hell” also captured international headlines when she, along with Miranda Devine, revealed that Joe Biden was intimately involved in Hunter’s businesses, appearing to even have a 10 percent stake in a company the scion formed with officials at the highest levels of the Chinese Communist Party.
Follow Wendell Husebø on Twitter @WendellHusebø. He is the author of Politics of Slave Morality.
Hunter has reportedly sold five paintings worth $75,000 each to an anonymous buyer. Hunter’s art dealer, Georges Bergès, has previously boasted he had strong ties to businessmen in Communist China, which has concerned many due to the Biden family’s business ventures abroad.
“We are 95% sure that that artwork went to China,” Comer said. “We don’t know where exactly that went to in China, but we’re going to try to find out when we get subpoena power.”
Follow Wendell Husebø on Twitter @WendellHusebø. He is the author of Politics of Slave Morality.
Biden family business dealings with China is a ‘national security issue’: Schweizer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Hew-Pm1d-0
Peter Schweizer’s new book Red-Handed: How American Elites Get Rich Helping China Win tells the story of how Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s (D-CA) husband Richard Blum was part owner of a Chinese firm that allegedly sold computers with spyware chips to the U.S. military. The military has never been able to calculate how much sensitive data these computers allowed China to steal.
THE BIDEN KLEPTOCRACY
RIDING THE DRAGON: The Bidens' Chinese Secrets (Full Documentary)
BlackRock, MSCI Draw Congressional Scrutiny for China Investments
The world’s largest asset manager and a leading investment index provider are facing congressional probes for allegedly facilitating the flow of U.S. dollars into Chinese companies that the United States has deemed to be fueling China’s military or the regime’s human rights abuses.
In letters dated July 31 to BlackRock CEO Larry Fink and MSCI head Henry Fernandez, the U.S. House’s China Select Committee stated that a brief review of MSCI indexes and BlackRock funds showed that the two companies together have directed investments to more than 60 Chinese entities already on the U.S. blacklist.
As a “direct result” of BlackRock’s and MSCI’s decisions, Americans who invested savings in their funds are now “unwittingly funding” Chinese companies that build weapons for the Chinese military known as the People’s Liberation Army, giving a hand to “the CCP’s stated mission of technological supremacy,” Rep. Mike Gallagher (R-Wis.), the committee’s chairman, and Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-Ill.), the ranking Democrat, wrote.
“It is unconscionable for any U.S. company to profit from investments that fuel the military advancement of America’s foremost foreign adversary and facilitate human rights abuses,” the lawmakers wrote, adding that the “massive flows of American capital” to these entities are “exacerbating an already significant national security threat and undermining American values.”
In the case of BlackRock, across five funds alone, the asset manager has invested more than $429 million in flagged Chinese firms, while nearly 5 percent of the MSCI China A Index is pegged to blacklisted entities. Such numbers, the lawmakers suspect, are only the tip of the iceberg.
The probe makes up part of the committee’s ongoing investigation into U.S. investments in China, which, in July, included venture capital firms that have invested in China-based artificial intelligence, semiconductor, and quantum companies.
A tough stance on China is one of the few issues that garner support from both political sides in the deeply divided Congress. The bipartisan House panel, formed in January, makes policy recommendations and has subpoena power, which Mr. Gallagher has said he would use if executives fail to cooperate with the committee probes.
“Both Democrats and Republicans can agree that we should not be funding PLA military modernization, supporting the CCP’s techno-totalitarian surveillance state, nor the CCP’s gross human rights abuses,” a source close to the committee told The Epoch Times.
MSCI has more than $13 trillion benchmarked to its products, making it one of the largest index providers globally. BlackRock oversees more than $9 trillion in assets, and is responsible to millions of U.S. investors who depend on its services for their future retirement.
BlackRock told The Epoch Times in a statement that it “complies with all applicable U.S. government laws” with “all investments in China and markets around the world,” and will continue to engage with the committee on the issues raised.
“Like many global asset managers, BlackRock offers our clients a number of strategies to invest in or exclude China from their portfolios. The majority of our clients’ investments in China are through index funds, and we are one of 16 asset managers currently offering U.S. index funds investing in Chinese companies,” a company spokesperson said.
MSCI, similarly, said it’s reviewing the request for information from the lawmakers.
“MSCI indexes measure the performance of equity markets available to international investors, and comply with all applicable U.S. laws. MSCI does not manage or recommend or facilitate investments in any country,” an MSCI spokesperson told The Epoch Times.
The Chinese entities on MSCI indexes include state-owned aerospace firm Aviation Industry Corp. China, which makes aircraft for the Chinese military; BGI Genomics, a military-linked Chinese genetics giant that the United States has found complicit in supporting forced labor; and ZTE, whose telecom equipment the United States banned last year, citing national security risks.
BlackRock, meanwhile, has funded a major subsidiary of China General Nuclear Power Group that the U.S. authorities accused of stealing U.S. nuclear technology, as well as that of China North Industries Group Co., producer of artillery shells and munitions for the Chinese military.
The lawmakers said they want to see a list of all the companies on MSCI indexes, as well as the thinking behind their inclusion, policies, and guidance documents relating to conflicts of interest that BlackRock has applied when engaging with China-linked entities, and details of U.S. investor exposure.
Lawmakers Raise Alarm Over TikTok’s Potential to Flood US Market With Slave Labor Goods
WASHINGTON—TikTok’s launch of a new shopping platform is causing concern among some U.S. lawmakers because of the prospect of the Chinese-owned video-sharing app flooding the U.S. market with the e-commerce business.
TikTok, owned by the Beijing-based tech giant ByteDance, is reportedly expanding its e-commerce business by introducing a new program in the United States as early as August.
Rather than partnering with U.S. merchants, TikTok will use the digital marketplace to sell goods manufactured in China, such as clothes and household gadgets, according to The Wall Street Journal, which cited unnamed sources.
With the shopping feature, TikTok is eyeing to take on Temu and Shein, two fellow Chinese e-retailers that have gained explosive growth in the United States by directly selling low-cost products made mostly in China.
“TikTok will follow in the path blazed by Shein and Temu. That is, it will flood the U.S. market with slave-made goods, bypassing the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act by keeping shipments below the $800 de minimis threshold for customs inspection,” Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) told The Epoch Times.
“This will undermine American businesses, because who can compete with slave labor and duty-free entry? Worse, it will make American citizens complicit in the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP’s) genocide in Xinjiang.”
More than a million Uyghur and other Muslim minorities have been incarcerated in internment camps in China’s far-western Xinjiang region, where they have been subjected to forced sterilization, torture, and forced labor. The United States and other Western democracies have labeled Beijing’s actions a genocide. An independent tribunal in London in December 2021 reached the same conclusion.
In response, President Joe Biden signed the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act into law in 2021, banning products from Xinjiang from being imported into the United States, unless companies could prove their suppliers don’t use forced labor. The law has been in effect since June 2022.
But lawmakers took note of a potential “loophole” in implementing the ban. Under current laws, products under $800 in valuation could enter the United States free of duty. These shipments could face fewer inspections by border officials related to the forced labor ban. Moreover, by avoiding tariffs and import duties, these digital marketplaces could sell products at low prices, offering them advantages over local retailers that buy in bulk.
The two booming Chinese shopping apps, Shein and Temu, have been accused of taking advantage of the exemption rule, which is referred to as the de minimis provision, and shipping thousands of small packages directly to U.S. customers.
According to a congressional finding released in June, more than 30 percent of imported parcels under the de minimis provision were reported by Shein and Temu last year. Nearly half of such shipments were from China, it added.
In the report, the House Select Committee on the CCP accused Temu of failing to maintain “even the façade of a meaningful compliance program” that blocked products sourced from forced labor in China from being sold on its platform.
Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), who is among the leading lawmakers in Congress pushing to clamp down on products made with forced labor in Xinjiang, raised concerns that merchandise sold on TikTok’s new marketplace could bypass the standard import controls.
The “Uyghur community, having been enslaved in an incredible, science fiction, high-track fashion is of concern to anybody who loves freedom in the world and who cares about human rights, and that was a big deal to say the products made with forced labor can’t come to the U.S.,” Mr. Merkley, co-chair of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China, told The Epoch Times.
“So if this bypasses that in any way, that’s a problem.”
The company last November quietly introduced the existing in-app shopping feature, TikTok Shop, to allow vendors to sell products by paying a commission on their sales. But for the new marketplace, TikTok will store and ship items and handle transactions, logistics, and customer service, according to The Wall Street Journal.
Additionally, TikTok is testing a new retail function, dubbed Trendy Beat, in the app’s British version. Products offered are shipped from China and sold by a subsidiary of TikTok’s parent company, ByteDance. A spokesperson for TikTok told media outlets they’re not testing the new program in the United States. But a trademark application filed in May for Trendy Beat suggested the social media company may be preparing to do so.
By expanding its e-commerce presence, TikTok is seeking to increase the gross merchandise value to as much as $20 billion from last year’s $4.4 billion, according to the report.
In response to a question from The Epoch Times at a press briefing, State Department spokesman Vedant Patel wouldn’t comment directly on TikTok’s initiative to sell goods made in China but said the Biden administration has moved to ban the Chinese-owned social media app on government devices.
“What I can say is from the State Department’s point of view, we’ve been clear—at least as it relates to TikTok—that they are not available or sanctioned to be used on State Department and U.S. government devices,” Mr. Patel said.
Mr. Rubio, calling for Congress to pass the Import Security and Fairness Act that he co-sponsored in June, said it’s time to ban TikTok.
“What matters more: a CCP-owned cellphone app or the economic health and moral security of our nation?” he asked.
The Epoch Times reached out to TikTok for comment but received none by press time.
National Security Concern
The push to ban TikTok, which has more than 113 million U.S. users a month, has been gaining momentum, at a time when threats stemming from the CCP’s global ambitions to challenge the liberal democratic world order are drawing broader concern.
Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle expressed security concerns about the viral app that could hand over American users’ data to the Chinese authorities, given that China’s intelligence law compels “any organization or citizen” to “support, assist, and cooperate” with security and intelligence agencies when asked.
The popular China-owned platform has for years sought to minimize its links with Beijing—links that triggered efforts from the Trump administration to block TikTok from operating in the United States. In a number of public statements, the company has maintained that it stores U.S. user data locally and wouldn’t hand it to Chinese authorities if asked.
As the social media app moves aggressively into e-commerce, its handling of American users’ data has Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.) concerned.
It’s important to ensure that “we’re not getting over to China or anyone else our information and access” that “they can play games with,” Mr. Meeks, House Foreign Affairs Committee ranking member, told The Epoch Times.
“We’ve got to protect our records, our identity, and our people,” he said. “I don’t want anything that’s stored in China.”
More than half of U.S. states have banned government-owned devices from using TikTok. Montana Gov. Greg Gianforte signed legislation in May banning the social media app from operating in his state. TikTok is challenging the state-wide ban that is set to take effect on Jan. 1, 2024.
During a Senate Select Committee on Intelligence hearing on March 8, FBI Director Christopher Wray said that TikTok “screams out with national security concerns” and could be used as a tool by the CCP to manipulate the thinking of millions in the United States.
Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), like Mr. Rubio, called for a complete ban in the United States.
“Not only is the Chinese Communist Party stealing our data using TikTok, but they want to team up together to influence our manufacturing sector. If there was any question that the app is being used as a tool for the CCP to embed in American society, there shouldn’t be now,” she said.
“They are a national security risk that should have no place in the U.S. while they are under CCP control.”
Jackson Richman contributed to this report.
Chinese Student With Military Ties Arrested for Alleged Visa Fraud
Chinese national Jiaxuemo Zhang, 28, was arrested and charged with criminal visa fraud, facing a maximum of 10 years in prison, U.S. Attorney for the Western District of New York Trini E. Ross announced on Aug. 3.
Mr. Zhang is pursuing a master’s degree at the University of Buffalo under an F-1 nonimmigrant visa issued by the U.S. Department of State in 2021 to study aerospace engineering. According to the complaint, Mr. Zhang conducted research and studied at Beihang University in China, which is known to do research for the Chinese military, the People’s Liberation Army (PLA). He omitted this information in his visa application outlining his education history and research activity. The only university listed was China University of Mining and Technology Beijing.
Beihang University is designated as one of China’s “Seven Sons of National Defense” and also houses nine major Chinese defense laboratories, including the National Laboratory of Computational Fluid Dynamics co-established with a military academy. Mr. Zhang conducted research in this laboratory.
During his time there, Mr. Zhang was also mentored by Chongwen Jiang, the deputy director of the Military Research Office.
Last December, Mr. Zhang began to apply to Ph.D. programs in the United States, and the agent on his case alleged the information on the CV he submitted differed from his visa application, revealing ties to Beihang University.
“My client is a Chinese student at the University at Buffalo. The Government alleges that he left information off his visa application to study in the United States. Mr. Zhang simply wanted to come here because America can provide him with the best education in the world. We look forward to sorting this all out as the case proceeds,” Fonda Dawn Kubiak, assistant federal public defender, told the Chinese language edition of The Epoch Times.
“Mr. Zhang entered a not guilty plea to the charge and is presumed innocent. The case is in the early stages of the criminal trial process. At this point, the defense team will review and assess the government’s evidence and thereafter formulate our defense as the case proceeds.”
Mr. Zhang appeared before U.S. Magistrate Judge Michael J. Roemer on July 28 and was released on conditions.
Students Collecting Technology for China
According to historical annual reports from Open Doors, there has been an explosion in the number of Chinese students enrolling in the United States in the past two decades, seeing a five-fold increase from 60,000 in 2000 to 317,000 in 2020. The constant upward trend dipped to 290,000 in 2021, but Chinese students still comprise the majority of international students.
In May 2020, then-President Donald Trump signed a proclamation suspending certain students and researchers from entry as nonimmigrants. The proclamation went into effect on June 1 of that year.
“The PRC authorities use some Chinese students, mostly post-graduate students and post-doctorate researchers, to operate as non-traditional collectors of intellectual property,” the proclamation reads.
These students and researchers “are at high risk of being exploited or co-opted” by China to acquire “sensitive United States technologies and intellectual property to modernize its military.”
The effort is “wide-ranging and heavily resourced” and “is a threat to our Nation’s long-term economic vitality and the safety and security of the American people,” the proclamation reads.
The proclamation barred nonimmigrant Chinese nationals from obtaining an F or J visa if they have received funding from, been employed by, studied at, or conducted research on behalf of entities with ties to China’s “military-civil fusion strategy” or its efforts to acquire foreign technologies. It makes an exception for students seeking to pursue undergraduate studies and asylum seekers, among others.
The FBI has repeatedly warned that China’s communist regime is targeting businesses, universities, and government research facilities to obtain artificial intelligence research and products in order to advance their own technologies, posing a national security threaT
Washington Post Gives Joe Biden ‘Four Pinocchios’ for Saying Hunter Never Made Money in China
The Washington Post‘s fact-checker, Glenn Kessler, gave President Joe Biden four Pinocchios for lying about his son Hunter Biden not making money in China.
Kessler documented two instances where Biden denied his son had made money in China.
In an October 22, 2020 presidential debate, Biden told moderator Kristen Welker: “My son has not made money in terms of this thing about, what are you talking about, China. I have not had … the only guy who made money from China is this guy [Donald Trump]. He’s the only one. Nobody else has made money from China.”
In a September 29, 2020, debate, Trump told Biden, “Once you became vice president [Hunter Biden] made a fortune in Ukraine, in China, in Moscow and various other places,” to which Biden responded, “That’s not true.”
Kessler wrote:
But now, nearly three years later, Biden’s assertions have been directly rebutted by Hunter himself. In court testimony last week, the younger Biden acknowledged that he in fact had been paid substantial sums in China — the first official confirmation that this was the case.
He added, “What is clear is that Hunter Biden did receive ‘a dollar from China.'”
Kessler noted that Hunter’s admission came “shortly before” lawmakers were due to interview his former business partner, Devon Archer.
Kessler also reviewed what he said were the “facts” about Hunter’s past business dealings in China.
He noted that Hunter flew on his father’s Air Force aircraft when the then-vice president was on an official trip to China in 2013, and that by Hunter’s own admission, he used the trip to connect with a Chinese business partner, and even introduced the partner to his father.
Kessler noted that 12 days after he was in China, Hunter joined the board of a just-formed investment advisory firm known as BHR (Bohai, Harvest and Rosemont), whose partners included Chinese entities, including the partner he introduced to his father.
The goal was to raise $1.5 billion, although they fell short of that, Kessler said. He wrote that Hunter later acquired a 10 percent interest in the entity overseeing the fund, but his lawyers claimed he divested of it after his father was elected president.
Kessler noted that after Biden left public office, Hunter in 2017 inked a deal with Chinese energy conglomerate CEFC China Energy, and that documents found on his laptop showed that over the course of 14 months, CEFC and its executives paid $4.8 million to entities controlled by Hunter Biden and Joe Biden’s brother, James.
Kessler also noted that a former Hunter business partner, Tony Bobulinski, said an email found on Hunter’s laptop about a proposed partnership agreement involving CEFC that said 10 percent would be “held by H for the big guy,” was a reference to Joe Biden.
“What wasn’t clear until now was how much money Hunter Biden personally received from these deals,” Kessler wrote.
Kessler wrote that last week, under questioning from U.S. District Judge Maryellen Noreika, Hunter acknowledged he earned nearly $2.4 million in 2017 and $2.2 million in 2018, ” most of which came from Chinese or Ukrainian interests.”
Under questioning, he acknowledged that in 2017 he earned just under a million dollars from a company he formed (Hudson West) with a CEO of a Chinese business conglomerate, and then latter he earned an additional $644,000 from CEFC later that year.
He also acknowledged he earned $500,000 in directors fees from Ukrainian natural gas and oil company Burisma, as well as $70,000 from Romanian business interests.
Hunter acknowledged that on March 22, 2018, he received a “million dollar payment” for legal fees for Patrick Ho, a CEFC official who was later charged in connection with a scheme to bribe African leaders.
Kessler also noted that both Democrats and Republicans acknowledged that Devon Archer testified behind closed doors that Hunter had put his father on speaker phone with business associates about “20 times over the course of a decade” — despite Biden saying he had “never spoken to” his son about his business dealings.
Democrats and the White House claimed those instances did not amount to a “substantive” conversation.
A Biden aide told Kessler that at the time Biden made his false claims he was “addressing a barrage of false attacks by Donald Trump.”
Kessler conceded that Biden may have been sloppy in his phrasing, but concluded, “The fact remains that Biden, during the debate, denied his son had made money in China. In court last week, his son has said he earned hundreds of thousands of dollars from Chinese business deals.”
Follow Breitbart News’s Kristina Wong on Twitter, Truth Social, or on Facebook.
Dem Rep. Krishnamoorthi on Alleged Leak of Secrets to China: DOD Has to Do More to Protect Secrets
On Friday’s broadcast of “CNN News Central,” Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) reacted to two Navy sailors being charged for sharing secret information with China by stating that “low-level folks in the military have access to too much classified or protected or sensitive information,” and the Department of Defense needs to do more to safeguard American secrets.
Krishnamoorthi stated that while he has a high degree of confidence that the U.S. can defend its interests in the Pacific, China is trying to get information about American operations in the Pacific, and it is “absolutely trying to get more of this information, and then, on the flip side, we have to do more to protect that information. And, quite frankly, I think it continues a pattern where I am concerned that low-level folks in the military have access to too much classified or protected or sensitive information, and that’s a separate issue that we have to tackle as well.”
He added, “I think they’re doing everything they can to target members of our military. They have 110,000 people in their equivalent of our CIA, which is called the Ministry of State Security, the MSS. And these people, around the world, are trying to go after targets, trying to recruit people like these individuals who were indicted recently. It’s a good thing that we uncovered this particular plot. But, going forward, obviously, we have to continue to be vigilant, because these folks, the CCP, are hell-bent on getting an information advantage on us.”
Co-host Boris Sanchez then asked, “Do you think the Pentagon is adequately protecting its secrets?”
Krishnamoorthi answered, “I think it could do more. I think it’s doing a decent job, but it needs to do more. What we know about the CCP is that roughly two-thirds of cyberattacks in the United States, just generally, come from the PRC. And, on top of that, they have recently been found to be planting malware in critical infrastructure related to military bases. I’m talking about power, water, and communications lines. They are, obviously, also trying to go after secrets within the Pentagon and at our federal contractors. And so, to that extent, we have to do a better job of promoting cybersecurity, not only at the Pentagon, but also in the private sector and making sure that those who are subject to attacks or victims of attacks are willing to share the information about it so we can all be protected.”
Follow Ian Hanchett on Twitter @IanHanchett
THE BIDEN KLEPTOCRACY
American people deserve to know what China was up to with Joe Biden, especially when Beijing had already shelled out millions of dollars to Biden family members — including millions in set-asides for “the big guy.” What else is on that infamous Hunter Biden laptop? The conflicted Biden Justice Department cannot be trusted to engage in any meaningful oversight on this issue. We need a special counsel now.
TOM FITTON - JUDICIAL WATCH
5 People Referenced Joe Biden as the ‘Big Guy’
Overwhelming evidence suggests the “big guy” is a monicker that represents President Joe Biden.
The monicker appears in an FBI informant form, text messages, and emails between Biden business associates. It also reportedly formed a part of the grand jury investigation into Hunter Biden, which IRS whistleblowers claim was politically influenced to protect the Bidens.
When questioned if he is the identity behind the monicker, Joe Biden snapped: “Why do you ask such a dumb question?”
At least five individuals involved in the family business referenced Joe Biden as the ‘big guy.”
1) Mykola Zlochevsky
An FBI informant form publicly revealed Thursday shows Zlochevsky referred to Joe Biden as the “big guy.” Zlochevsky is the founder of Burisma Holdings. An FBI informant claimed in a FD-1023 form that Zlochevsky bribed Joe and Hunter Biden with $5 million each:
CHS mentioned Zlochevsky might have difficulty explaining suspicious wire transfers that may evidence any (Illicit) payments to the Bidens. Zlochevsky responded he did not send any funds directly to the “Big Guy” (which CHS understood was a reference to Joe Biden).
2) Gary Shapley
IRS whistleblower Gary Shapley said the leadership of the DOJ’s criminal investigation of Hunter Biden for alleged tax and gun violations prevented subordinates from investigating the “big guy.”
The whistleblower told Republicans:
Among other things, we wanted to question Walker about an email that said: “Ten held by H for the big guy.” We had obvious questions like who was H, who the big guy was, and why this percentage was to be held separately with the association hidden. But AUSA Wolf interjected and said she did not want to ask about the big guy and stated she did not want to ask questions about “dad.” When multiple people in the room spoke up and objected that we had to ask, she responded, there’s no specific criminality to that line of questioning.
3) James Gilliar
Hunter Biden’s business partner, James Gilliar, dubbed Joe Biden ‘the big guy’ in a 2017 email. Gilliar used the monicker for Joe Biden in his May 13, 2017, email to whistleblower Tony Bobulinski, who confirmed “the big guy” was a reference to Joe Biden. The 2017 email revealed a business deal between Bobulinski, the Biden family, and high-ranking members of the Chinese Communist Party would include 10 percent “held by H for the big guy?”
Gilliar also called Joe Biden the “big guy” a second time on October 14, 2020, in an exchange with a panicked unnamed person, the New York Post reported:
Gilliar was asked if “Hunter and/or Joe or Joe’s campaign [would] try to make it ‘Oh, we were never involved’ … and try to basically make us collateral damage?”
“I don’t see how that would work for them…,” Gilliar responded in the 6:07 p.m. message reviewed by The Post.
“I think in the scenario that he wins they would just leave sleeping dogs lie,” Gilliar added. “If they lose, honestly, I don’t think that the Big Guy really cares about that because he’ll be too busy focusing on all the other s–t he is doing.”
4) Geoff Roger
Rogers wrote to the president’s son, “Hunt see below… I was not there but heard all about it. The big guy made them happy.”
5) Hunter Biden
Hunter Biden used the “big guy” monicker in a 2014 email to Chuck Harple, a trade union lobbyist, with whom Hunter Biden hoped to set a meeting between the head of the North American Building Trades Union and Joe Biden. The email came after not receiving a response after using an official channel.
I’ll work on it — but is there any issue I should know about before I go around everyone and straight to him?” Hunter questioned.
“What works best — for you and I — is for you to call [the union president] first. Say you talked to me and that you want to get all the facts before you talk to the big guy,” Harple replied.
Follow Wendell Husebø on Twitter @WendellHusebø. He is the author of Politics of Slave Morality.
No comments:
Post a Comment