3 MIN AGO: NYC Starts Arresting ALL Migrants!
CHUCK SCHUMER'S STATE WILL HAND OUT BILLIONS FOR JOE'S ILLEGALS EVEN AS LEGALS SLEEP ON THE SIDEWALK!
NYPD investigating suspected migrant crime ring
‘Sanctuary Church’ Helps Free from Jail Illegal Alien Charged with Migrant Mob Attack on NYPD Officers
One of only two illegal aliens held on bail following a migrant mob attack on New York City Police Department (NYPD) officers last month is now free to walk the streets again thanks to a so-called “sanctuary church” in Brooklyn that posted his bond.
On Jan. 27, a mob of illegal aliens from Venezuela were caught on surveillance and police body cam footage attacking a pair of NYPD officers outside of a taxpayer-funded migrant shelter in midtown Manhattan.
NYPD / BODY CAMS+ /TMXThus far, only two of the seven illegal aliens charged with the violent attack have been ordered held on bail at Riker’s Island in New York City, while the others were immediately released thanks to New York state’s bail reform law.
Now, according to the New York Post, one of those illegal aliens held on bail is back on the city’s streets after a “sanctuary church” in Brooklyn paid his $15,000 bond:
The sole migrant who had been held behind bars for the gang attack on two NYPD cops in Times Square is now also free after an activist Brooklyn priest posted his $15,000 bail, The Post has learned. [Emphasis added]
Yohenry Brito, 24, who was being held at Rikers Island on the Jan. 27 cop attack and is due to be arraigned on an assault indictment this week, walked out of jail Tuesday after Good Shepherd Lutheran Church in Bay Ridge put up the money, the church’s pastor said. [Emphasis added]
“Our church is basically a sanctuary,” the Rev. Juan Ruiz told The Post on Wednesday. “We assume that people are innocent until they are proven otherwise.” [Emphasis added]
Yarwuin Madris, an 18-year-old illegal alien from Venezuela, was arrested this week for the attack and is being held in jail on bail.
Meanwhile, five illegal aliens — 24-year-old Yorman Reveron, 22-year-old Jhoan Boada, 21-year-old Wilson Juarez, 19-year-old Darwin Andres Gomez-Izquiel, and 19-year-old Kelvin Servita Arocha — have been charged with the attack but were all released without bail.
Boada went viral online when he was filmed leaving a Manhattan courthouse flipping off cameras earlier this month following his arrest.
Gomez-Izquiel is now back in NYPD custody after he was arrested for allegedly robbing a Macy’s in Queens just weeks after being arrested for the attack. Likewise, Juarez and Arocha are also now in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) custody but are due back in Manhattan court this week.
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg (D), financially linked to billionaire George Soros, has come under immense fire for releasing most of the illegal aliens accused of the attack on NYPD officers.
Republicans in the New York State Senate, for example, have called on Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) to remove Bragg from his position as district attorney.
Hochul has yet to call out Bragg by name, instead telling the media that “you don’t let them out [of jail], you ask for bail, a judge grants it and then you hold people until you find out exactly what happened” in the case.
Bragg’s district attorney’s office, though, has not sought bail for most of the illegal aliens accused in the attack.
John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Email him at jbinder@breitbart.com. Follow him on Twitter here.
GOP Rep. Guest: We Passed an Increase in Border Agents and Detention Beds that Schumer Still Won’t Move
On Thursday’s broadcast of the Fox Business Network’s “Bottom Line,” Rep. Michael Guest (R-MS) responded to arguments from Democrats that the failure of the Senate bill will force budget shortfalls on DHS by pointing out that the House appropriations bill increased the number of Border Patrol agents and the number of detention beds, while prior budget requests from the Biden administration have requested cuts to detention beds.
Guest said, [relevant remarks begin around 2:05] “The crisis on the southern border was created by the fact that Secretary Mayorkas refuses to enforce the law. He refuses to detain inmates. And it is so ironic now that they are — being the Democrats — are saying, because the bill in the Senate did not pass, they’re going to have to close detention beds. If they’re worried about funding detention beds, take up the appropriations bill that we passed out of the House that funds DHS. We funded 41,500 detention beds. Secretary Mayorkas only asked for 25,000. We funded a record number of Custom[s] and Border Patrol agents. And so, it is so ironic for the Democrats to want to bring Republicans and [say] we are responsible for the lack of funding, when they’ve had a bill in the senate for months now, that Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) has refused to bring up, and they are going to exacerbate the crisis that they created.”
Follow Ian Hanchett on Twitter @IanHanchett
JOE BIDEN CRONY LARRY FINK OF BLACKROCK HAS ACQUIRED $60 BILLION IN RENTAL WHILE JOJO HAS BEEN IN OFFICE. DO A SEARCH FOR BIDEN AND LARRY!
The inflow also reduces economic pressure on the federal government to deal with Americans’ problems — homelessness, low wages, a shrinking middle class, slowing innovation, declining blue-collar life expectancy, spreading poverty, the rising death toll from drugs, and the spreading alienation among young people.
Poll Reveals Consensus: Migration Curbs Are Good for U.S.
Almost 70 percent of Americans say the U.S. would benefit from new curbs on migration at the southern border, according to an Economist/YouGov poll of 1,671 citizens.
The February 11-13 poll asked, “If Congress passes a new bill restricting the admission of new migrants at the border, do you think this would be good or bad for the United States?”
Sixty-nine percent of the Americans responded that it would be “good,” while only 14 percent predicted “bad.”
That result shows five Americans believe migration curbs will benefit America for every one American who believes migration curbs would be harmful.
The new national consensus against southern migration comes after President Joe Biden and Democrats vigorously backed a Senate bill that they suggested would sharply curb their huge wave of southern migration.
The Democrats’ suggestion was a deceptive promise in the 2024 campaign. In reality, the Senate bill was so fraudulent, pro-migration, and lopsided that it was torpedoed by a revolt among populist-minded Republican senators on February 7.
But the Democrats’ rhetoric about migration curbs inadvertently gives Americans an opportunity to openly back the curbs on legal and illegal migration that they have privately favored.
Many Americans, especially nonpolitical Americans, hide their private concerns about mass migration under a well-meaning welcome for individual migrants. Often, this silence is caused by a reluctance to publicly contradict the establishment’s “Nation of Immigrants” narrative that has been pushed on children and adults since the Cold War 1960s.
But the silence has been cracked by Biden’s increasingly unpopular refusal to enforce the nation’s border laws — and by his welcome for more than six million wage-cutting, rent-inflating migrants. For example, just 11 percent of YouGov’s respondents said they “strongly approve” of Biden’s border policy, while 57 percent strongly disapprove.
The new willingness to openly oppose migration is seen in the new YouGov poll: Just 17 percent of respondents dodged the “good or bad for the United States?” question by declaring they were “Not Sure” how to answer the survey question.
All groups in the new YouGov poll said migration curbs would be good for America.
For example, self-described liberals believe curbs would be good for the nation by 57 percent to 29 percent.
Curbs were welcomed by 88 percent of people who plan to vote for Donald Trump in 2024 and a 55 percent majority of people who plan to vote for Joe Biden. Only one in five — 20 percent — of Biden voters said the curbs would have bad results.
Sixty percent of swing-voting independents believe curbs would be good for the U.S., as do 49 percent of liberals, 69 percent of “moderates,” 66 percent of Hispanics, 53 percent of black people, and 73 percent of white Americans.
Young people — who tend to be most welcoming of migrants — also voted strongly in favor of new curbs, with 57 percent saying “good” and just 22 percent saying “bad.”
The poll furthermore showed that Democrats believe curbs would help Biden more than Trump.
The survey also asked if border curbs would benefit Biden. Fifty-four percent of Democrats and 47 percent of liberals said the curbs would benefit him.
When asked if curbs would benefit Trump, only 36 percent of Democrats and 39 percent of liberals said the curbs would be good for him.
Forty percent of Americans said migration makes U.S. politics better, and 13 percent said it makes politics worse.
A new report from the Congressional Budget Office reinforces the vast evidence that the federal policy of Extraction Migration shifts family wages and workplace investment toward Wall Street, real estate, coastal states, and government.
The economic policy is very unpopular, in part, because it also diverts politicians’ focus from American communities and the rising “deaths of despair” among discarded Americans.
RELATED — Cuellar: ‘We’re Going to Lose a Lot of Democrats’ Because Biden ‘Ignored’ Border, Won’t Deport People He Needs To
No comments:
Post a Comment