JOE BIDEN CRONY LARRY FINK OF BLACKROCK HAS ACQUIRED $60 BILLION IN RENTAL WHILE JOJO HAS BEEN IN OFFICE. DO A SEARCH FOR BIDEN AND LARRY!
The inflow also reduces economic pressure on the federal government to deal with Americans’ problems — homelessness, low wages, a shrinking middle class, slowing innovation, declining blue-collar life expectancy, spreading poverty, the rising death toll from drugs, and the spreading alienation among young people.
Feds: Illegal Aliens Charged with Attack on NYPD Officers Members of Venezuela’s Tren de Aragua Gang
At least two of eight illegal aliens accused of attacking New York City Police Department (NYPD) officers last month are members of Venezuela’s violent street gang known as Tren de Aragua, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials reveal. Seven of the illegal aliens are now in jail on Rikers Island.
On Jan. 27, a mob of illegal aliens from Venezuela was caught on surveillance and police body cam footage attacking a pair of NYPD officers outside of a taxpayer-funded migrant shelter in midtown Manhattan.
Since then, eight illegal aliens have been charged with the attack. On Friday, seven of the illegal aliens were sent to jail on Rikers Island in New York after pleading not guilty. Only one illegal alien linked to the attack has yet to be arraigned.
NYPD / BODY CAMS+ /TMXThe five illegal aliens arraigned on Friday are:
- 24-year-old Yorman Reveron held on a $100,000 cash bail or $250,000 bond
- 24-year-old Yohenry Brito held on a $15,000 cash bail or $50,000 bond
- 19-year-old Kelvin Servita Arocha held on a $15,000 cash bail
- 21-year-old Wilson Juarez held on a $1 cash bail
- 19-year-old Darwin Gomez-Izquiel held on a $50,000 cash bail
Meanwhile, 21-year-old Ulises Bohorquez and 18-year-old Yarwuin Madris are already being held on Rikers Island for the attack. Bohorquez has a cash bail of $100,000, while Madris has been ordered held without bail.
Jhoan Boada, a 22-year-old illegal alien from Venezuela, has been charged and let out without bail but has yet to be arraigned.
Thanks to Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg (D), linked to billionaire George Soros, previously not requesting bail for most, Brito and Madris were the only two illegal aliens charged in the attack who have remained consistently in jail, while the others had been released.
A so-called “sanctuary church” in Brooklyn, this week, had sought to help free Brito from jail by paying his previously set $15,000 cash bail, but he was ordered held on the bail on Friday.
According to ICE officials, who spoke to the Washington Times‘s Stephen Dinan, Juarez and Arocha are both members of Venezuela’s Tren de Aragua and crossed the southern border at some point in the last couple of years.
ICE agents had taken both into custody, noting that Arocha was wanted by the agency, while Juarez had already been ordered deported by a federal immigration judge a year ago but was never deported.
Juarez’s low bail of just $1 is likely to get him off Rikers Island, but ICE agents have said he will re-enter their custody if he is released from jail. Juarez’s bail is vastly lower than other suspects because he is charged with a single count of tampering with evidence, not with the attack.
The gang members’ involvement in the attack comes as federal authorities are increasingly worried that the nation’s porous southern border is allowing hundreds, potentially thousands, of Tren de Aragua members into American communities to set up shop.
In New York City, federal authorities worry that Tren de Aragua may form an alliance with the violent MS-13 gang from El Salvador which has many members across the city and Long Island.
John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Email him at jbinder@breitbart.com. Follow him on Twitter here.
Poll Reveals Consensus: Migration Curbs Are Good for U.S.
Almost 70 percent of Americans say the U.S. would benefit from new curbs on migration at the southern border, according to an Economist/YouGov poll of 1,671 citizens.
The February 11-13 poll asked, “If Congress passes a new bill restricting the admission of new migrants at the border, do you think this would be good or bad for the United States?”
Sixty-nine percent of the Americans responded that it would be “good,” while only 14 percent predicted “bad.”
That result shows five Americans believe migration curbs will benefit America for every one American who believes migration curbs would be harmful.
The new national consensus against southern migration comes after President Joe Biden and Democrats vigorously backed a Senate bill that they suggested would sharply curb their huge wave of southern migration.
The Democrats’ suggestion was a deceptive promise in the 2024 campaign. In reality, the Senate bill was so fraudulent, pro-migration, and lopsided that it was torpedoed by a revolt among populist-minded Republican senators on February 7.
But the Democrats’ rhetoric about migration curbs inadvertently gives Americans an opportunity to openly back the curbs on legal and illegal migration that they have privately favored.
Many Americans, especially nonpolitical Americans, hide their private concerns about mass migration under a well-meaning welcome for individual migrants. Often, this silence is caused by a reluctance to publicly contradict the establishment’s “Nation of Immigrants” narrative that has been pushed on children and adults since the Cold War 1960s.
But the silence has been cracked by Biden’s increasingly unpopular refusal to enforce the nation’s border laws — and by his welcome for more than six million wage-cutting, rent-inflating migrants. For example, just 11 percent of YouGov’s respondents said they “strongly approve” of Biden’s border policy, while 57 percent strongly disapprove.
The new willingness to openly oppose migration is seen in the new YouGov poll: Just 17 percent of respondents dodged the “good or bad for the United States?” question by declaring they were “Not Sure” how to answer the survey question.
All groups in the new YouGov poll said migration curbs would be good for America.
For example, self-described liberals believe curbs would be good for the nation by 57 percent to 29 percent.
Curbs were welcomed by 88 percent of people who plan to vote for Donald Trump in 2024 and a 55 percent majority of people who plan to vote for Joe Biden. Only one in five — 20 percent — of Biden voters said the curbs would have bad results.
Sixty percent of swing-voting independents believe curbs would be good for the U.S., as do 49 percent of liberals, 69 percent of “moderates,” 66 percent of Hispanics, 53 percent of black people, and 73 percent of white Americans.
Young people — who tend to be most welcoming of migrants — also voted strongly in favor of new curbs, with 57 percent saying “good” and just 22 percent saying “bad.”
The poll furthermore showed that Democrats believe curbs would help Biden more than Trump.
The survey also asked if border curbs would benefit Biden. Fifty-four percent of Democrats and 47 percent of liberals said the curbs would benefit him.
When asked if curbs would benefit Trump, only 36 percent of Democrats and 39 percent of liberals said the curbs would be good for him.
Forty percent of Americans said migration makes U.S. politics better, and 13 percent said it makes politics worse.
A new report from the Congressional Budget Office reinforces the vast evidence that the federal policy of Extraction Migration shifts family wages and workplace investment toward Wall Street, real estate, coastal states, and government.
The economic policy is very unpopular, in part, because it also diverts politicians’ focus from American communities and the rising “deaths of despair” among discarded Americans.
RELATED — Cuellar: ‘We’re Going to Lose a Lot of Democrats’ Because Biden ‘Ignored’ Border, Won’t Deport People He Needs To
No comments:
Post a Comment