Friday, February 9, 2024

IF JOJO BIDEN IS IN PRISON, AND MICHELLE OUT PREACHING RACISM, AND KAMALA RECOVERING FROM YET ANOTHER LOBOTOMY, WILL GEORGE SOROS BE PRESIDENT (AGAIN)?

WE CAN'T SAVE AMERICA UNTIL BIDEN IS IN PRISON ALONG WITH HIS CUBAN MAYORKAS 

Is Joe Biden’s staff sabotaging him or saving the nation?

The special counsel’s report on Joe Biden’s illegally hoarded documents from the time he was a senator and vice president was devastating on several counts.  Special counsel Robert Hur found that Biden “willfully and intentionally” took classified documents and stored them carelessly.  He also shared them illegally with ghost writer, Mark Zwonitzer.  But, he won’t be charged with a crime because his memory is now defective—in other words he is elderly and too feeble-minded, and making him a defendant would be cruel!  This is not how the legal system is supposed to work.

Never having been president at the time, Biden had no right to take any of said documents into his possession.  But, as everyone knows by now, the report also described Biden’s serious cognitive decline, a fact anyone who has been paying attention knows only too well.  The man’s brain is mush.  He should be home enjoying his dotage in peace, without his Edith Wilson wife shoving him on and off various stages.  She is a nasty piece of work; she never should have allowed him to run for she surely knew then what we all know now.

But to add insult to injury, Biden’s staff sent him out for a press conference to address the report.  They even allowed a press pool who shouted questions at him. That is rare; he usually has a prompt sheet telling him who to call on, what their question will be, and what his answer will be.  Not this time.  The result was a disaster.  He showed his anger, bragging that the charges against him were nothing like those against President Trump.  But they were exactly the same, only Trump’s documents were legally his to take under the Presidential Records Act, and were stored under lock and key, guarded by the Secret Service, not in a mess behind only a garage door.

So, the question is: what was Biden’s staff thinking, letting him speak to the nation at a time past his known bedtime, when he was clearly agitated, angry, defensive and obviously disoriented.  He called the president of Mexico El-Sisi; El-Sisi is the president of Egypt.  There were other obvious and serious lapses of sentience in his short, befuddled talk.  One has to wonder if his staff, seeing the writing on the wall, meant to expose his dementia to the nation at this time.  Isn’t it possible that they know he is non compos mentis and want to speed up the process of removing him from office?  They had to know he would behave exactly as he did.  No matter how many drugs he is given when he must appear in public, they are no longer working; they cannot fix or conceal his palpable dementia.

That Trump is being charged, absurdly persecuted by the odious Jack Smith for taking and properly storing documents he was legally allowed to keep now seems like what it is, more desperate lawfare.  Those charges should now certainly be dropped.  With each passing day, the fact that there is a two-tiered system of justice in this country is a constant slap in the faces of conservatives.  Pro-life activists are facing eleven years in prison for singing hymns near an abortion mill while the BLM and Antifa rioters of 2016, Trump’s inauguration, and the summer of 2020, who caused billions of dollars of damage, were not charged with the crimes they committed: arson, vandalism, destruction of federal property, etc.  Hundreds of persons present at the Capitol on J6 have been thrown in jail, denied due process, and sentenced to terms far out of proportion for the crime of “parading.”  There are countless examples of our system of justice having been weaponized, perverted, against people who oppose the extremist, globalist agenda of the American left.  America is now a functional police state.

Despite the left’s denials, there is no doubt that the 2020 election was not a clean and fair process, rigged and/or influenced by numerous calculating schemers on the left—Mark Elias, fraudulent mail-in ballots, Zuckerberg, a cabal of Democrat cheaters across the country.  Biden did not get 81 million votes, or if he did, he didn’t get 81 million legal votes.  The left so fears Trump that they are willing to do anything, no matter how illegal or corrupt, to destroy the man.  They fear his undermining of the uniparty, the deep state that actually runs the country.  They fear the loss of the power that defines and enriches them.  But the more lawfare they throw at Trump, the higher his polls go; everyone except the pundits on MSNBC and CNN knows it.  Their pundits are turning themselves inside out trying to diminish the meaning of the special counsel’s report.  They seem to have no idea how hilarious their silly defenses of Biden are at this point.

John Yoo has suggested that if Biden feels the report unfairly represented the facts with regard to his mental acuity, he could release the transcripts of the interviews with the special counsel; I am betting that will never happen.  If any of his staff or his wife were with him during that two-day interview with the special counsel, they certainly know now how far gone he is.  Perhaps that is why they chose to let him expose his condition to the nation.  Has his mental decline affected his judgment regarding: Opening the border to all comers, ten to twelve million foreigners?  The disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan?  His provoking Putin to invade Ukraine?  His terribly conflicted response to the Hamas attack on Israel?  His ignoring of the SCOTUS regarding the cancellation of student loans?  Destroying the energy independence achieved under Trump?  His “pausing” exports of LNG?  His militant embrace of transgenderism?  His releasing billions of dollars to Iran?

Then there is the massive financial corruption of the Biden family. The list of his actions devastatingly detrimental to the country is long.  Whoever let him speak to the nation Thursday evening wanted the American people to know just how far gone he is.  He must be removed from office before he does any more damage.

Image generated by AI.

It Can’t Be Biden

Despite having always been a walking gaffe-machine, there was once a time when it would have been difficult to deny that Joe Biden was among the slipperiest in the nest of vipers that is Washington, D.C.

That time is certainly not now.  It would be bad enough that, as President* of the United States, he’s incapable of taking scripted questions from predetermined and friendly reporters.  But the ravages of age have impaired him beyond even the most basic cognitive and physical function.  He shuffles about aimlessly, as if lost, whether he’s at the G7 Summit or in the White House Rose Garden.  Even with the aid of a teleprompter, his slurring makes his speech incomprehensible.  His inability to remember key details, and butchering of simple exchanges with the press and diplomats, has made him the subject of mockery among world leaders.

Understandably, given these circumstances, the looming question is: Who’s going to replace Biden on the Democrat ticket in 2024?  This has been a topic throughout his presidency, and it really picked up steam in 2023.  Now however, those discussions seem to have gone by the wayside, and we’re all meant to assume that Democrats are prepared to have him headline.

Many would suggest that we’re just too far along to replace him now.  “Is it too late for Biden to bow out in 2024?” Thomas Gift asks rhetorically at The Conversation.  “Technically, no,” he answers, but he suggests that it’s unlikely due to 30 states already having passed the deadline to get candidates’ names on the primary ballot.  And if Biden isn’t replaced by March, he says, then there would be a “high-stakes fracas at the party’s convention” in August.

There are a lot of uncertain things in politics, and predictions are risky.  But you don’t have to know much about reading political tea leaves to conclude that Biden’s appearance on the ticket in November of 2024 would be a catastrophe for Democrats.

Biden appears to be simply unelectable at this point, and while I don’t believe that Democrats are diabolical geniuses, I also don’t think they’re too stupid to recognize this.

Some things are so obvious that almost everyone can see them.  After having watched Biden bumble around and led around by handlers for a few years, a full 77% of Americans feel that Biden is too old to serve another term in office, for all the aforementioned reasons which have been impossible to ignore.

In the realm of politics in America, 77% is a landslide.  You’d have a hard time getting 77% of Americans to agree on anything, and for reference, that’s higher than the percentage of Americans who say that the American flag “makes them feel proud.”  But 77% of Americans, including 69% of Democrats, agree that Biden is just too old for a second term.

The news only gets worse from there.  According to an NBC poll, Donald Trump has a 23-point lead over Biden on the question of which candidate has the “mental and physical health to be president.”  On the matter of who might better “secure the border and control immigration,” Trump owns a 35-point lead.  Who can better deal with the economy?  Trump by 22 points.  Dealing with crime and violence?  Trump by 21 points.

Among the only issues where Biden actually leads Trump is on abortion (by 12 points) and climate.  The trouble for Democrats is that abortion and climate are prioritized as a top issue by only 21% of American voters.  Since each respondent in this poll was allowed to select three of their top issues, and given the fact that these two issues tend to be peculiarly prioritized only by very socially-minded leftists in suburbia and left-wing college students, the 1-in-5 voter who prioritizes abortion is likely the same voter that prioritizes climate policy.

Again, Democrats aren’t stupid, and they see what you and everyone else see in those numbers.  And the numbers highlight, Mark Murray at NBC says, the clear reversal of the trends observed just six months ago.  In July of 2023, Biden went from a 49–45% lead in a hypothetical head-to-head with Trump, to now being at a 47–42% deficit.

The good news, Murray reports, is that Biden “pulls ahead of Trump when voters are asked about their ballot choice if [Trump] is convicted of a felony.”  But even that may be a phantom hope, given that Biden’s lead then only becomes a two-point margin, and that’s within the margin of error.

So, are Democrats betting the farm on a Trump conviction?  Maybe, but their efforts to convict him haven’t served them well so far.

The first Trump indictment began in June of 2023, and since then, Biden has lost significant ground in most head-to-head matchups with Trump.  This isn’t necessarily because Trump has attracted voters, as the NBC poll numbers show.  It’s because Biden has shed voters to an incredible degree.

Whatever the reason for that, whether it’s Biden’s ever more apparent senility, the invasion at the Southern border, or Biden’s weaponized government agencies targeting his political rival, the trajectory is calamitous for Democrats.  Biden is obviously in freefall, and I can’t imagine that Democrats haven’t already packed a parachute.

Unlike Thomas Gift at The Conversation, and all the other people pretending that we’re too far along for Democrats to anoint a new candidate, I can recall the 2016 and 2020 Democrat primaries.  And I know that anointing a presidential candidate at the convention in August might be much cleaner than again having to cover up the DNC’s efforts to thwart the democratic will of its voters, as it did in 2016 and 2020.

We could discuss the oddities in the coin-flips which put Hillary Clinton on the road to the presidency in 2016; but it’s unnecessary.  It was so obvious that the DNC would accept nothing less than a Hillary Clinton nomination in 2016 that the DNC was forced to apologize to Bernie Sanders and his supporters for Party officials’ bias against him, which was exposed by a large cache of leaked internal emails.

But that wasn’t the last time that the Democrat elites sabotaged Bernie’s primary hopes, which leads us to the Super Tuesday Massacre of 2020.

Bernie was running away with the primary in early 2020, you might recall, while Biden was floundering.  He finished fourth in Iowa, and placed a dismal fifth place in New Hampshire. 

South Carolina was his Hail Mary.  House Representative James Clyburn offered to help Joe Biden secure the black vote in South Carolina—if he committed to nominating a black woman as his first Supreme Court nominee.

Clyburn saved Biden’s candidacy in South Carolina, keeping Joe alive for the DNC.  But the problem was that all the energy and momentum still remained with Sanders.

Then, a curious thing happened.  Pete Buttigieg and Amy Klobuchar, both having performed fairly well in the primary up to that point, dropped out of the race just before Super Tuesday.  This cleared the lane for Biden to generally own the “moderate” vote of the Democrat party.  Meanwhile, Elizabeth Warren remained in the race, cannibalizing large swathes of the far-left, socialist voting bloc that would likely have gone to Bernie Sanders.

You may have noticed that Pete Buttigieg, who couldn’t fill potholes as the mayor of South Bend, later got a cushy appointment as Secretary of the Department of Transportation.  That’s just a coincidence, I’m sure.

Yes, it all looks really shady.  But the fact is that the DNC had decided that, by hook or by crook, Crooked Hillary was going to be on the ticket in 2016.  And in 2020, it was going to be the generic Democrat fixture, old Sleepy Joe, who would be campaigning from his basement while the trusty Democrat machine worked to normalize mail-in ballots and change election laws to Democrats’ advantage.

The primary system has proven inconvenient to the DNC, and their past shenanigans to ensure that their anointed candidate is “selected” within the primary framework has been difficult to conceal.

As such, it makes sense that the DNC would wait to anoint Biden’s replacement.  The very best scenario imaginable for the DNC isn’t to open the process to ideas and speculation and voters today, but to have Biden eliminated from the race at some time around the convention.

It would be a madhouse of speculation and criticism, of course, but all that would be needed is enough of the delegates that were pledged to Biden to break for the newly-anointed candidate.  Superdelegates would have no say unless the convention is contested, though it may be contested to make the process look less rigged.  Thus, they would be able to nullify the preceding primary votes and disenfranchise the voters once again in order to anoint the DNC’s preferred candidate—but this time, it will be justified by the veneer of necessity.

Biden represents an unprecedented crisis, and that requires an unprecedented response.  He is in freefall, and it appears that he’s outlived his usefulness to the Party.  It just makes sense for Democrats to pull the ripcord around summertime.

The only remaining question is, who will be the parachute for the Party?

Image generated by AI.


DOJ MERRICK GARLAND HAS DEDICATED HIMSELF TO PROTECTING THE BIDEN CRIME FAMILY. THE GAMER LAWYER HAS DONE IT AGAIN!


Too incompetent to be prosecuted but not too incompetent to rule?

Per Special counsel Robert Hur’s—a Republican, you’ll be reminded incessantly if you follow this story—findings in the Joe Biden classified documents case, Biden “willfully retained and disclosed classified material after his vice presidency when he was a private citizen.”  I’m not a lawyer but I’m pretty sure this constitutes a felony, at least when a Republican or anyone not named Obama, Biden, or Clinton does it.  But Mr. Hur won’t bring charges because “Mr. Biden would likely present himself to a jury, as he did during our interview with him, as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory.”

This brings to mind the story of Vincent “The Chin” Gigante, a mafioso who feigned insanity to avoid prosecution.  Don’t get me wrong, I don’t think Mr. Biden, at this point, has the capacity to feign anything, least of all competence.  But he wasn’t a pathetic, senile caricature of his current self when these crimes were committed.  Hur’s decision to not charge reminds of James Comey’s speech exonerating Hillary Clinton of her national security breaches.  The difference here is Hur has the authority to charge or not, where Comey did not.  Many saw this as Comey taking his boss, then Attorey General Loretta Lynch, off the hook for making an obviously, politically charged call.

Democrat partisans are, naturally, calling the prosecutor’s report a hatchet job on the president.  If they were being honest they would thank him for putting what many would consider the final nail in Biden’s reelection fantasy.  It’s been widely speculated for some time that after acquiring the needed delegate count in the Democrat primaries that Biden would bow out of the race at the convention and throw his delegates to Michelle Obama, Gavin Newsome, or… God help us, Hillary.

I said four years ago that come November there was no way Biden would be atop the Democrat ticket.  Obviously, I was wrong.  But I feel much more confident in making the same assertion this time around. The $64,000 question is: who will replace him?  That he was “elected” four years ago is testament to how corrupt our political system has become; it’s not as though he was competent then either.  That senile Joe is some kind of puppet front for a covert third Obama administration is hardly speculative.  He has become, for Democrats, the most useful of idiots, but his utility is fading fast.



Raskin: Special Counsel Biden’s A.G. Picked Is an ‘Age-Discriminatory’ Politically-Motivated Republican

On Thursday’s broadcast of CNN’s “Situation Room,” Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) argued that Robert Hur, the Special Counsel appointed by Attorney General Merrick Garland to oversee the classified documents probe of President Joe Biden is a Republican who “intended” to raise concerns about Biden’s age with the “kind of age-discriminatory and age-insulting remarks” about President Biden in the report.

Raskin said, “[T]his Republican special counsel said that Joe Biden had been completely forthcoming and cooperative and they’re not bringing any criminal charges against him. He did take some gratuitous slaps at Joe Biden because of his age, and a lot of these kind of age-discriminatory and age-insulting remarks are getting rather tiresome. All we really need from a special prosecutor like Hur is a decision whether there [are] any legal grounds to move forward, he said there [are] not. And he didn’t need to take all those cheap shots, and, obviously, you could take the same kinds of cheap shots at Donald Trump, who recently confused a woman that he sexually attacked and then lied about with one of his wives and also mixed up Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Nikki Haley.”

Host Wolf Blitzer asked, “In the Special Counsel’s report, it says that President Biden couldn’t remember when he was vice president or even when his son Beau died. It is important to note that many Americans are seriously concerned about his age. Does this raise alarms about whether President Biden is fit to serve another term in office?”

Raskin responded, “Well, undoubtedly, that’s what Robert Hur, who comes from my state, he’s a Maryland Republican, undoubtedly, that’s what he intended to do with those ridiculous cheap shots. I just spent an hour with President Biden and the entire Democratic caucus, where he regaled and entertained everyone for an hour and went through all of the extraordinary accomplishments of his administration, including the Inflation Reduction Act. We’ve got the best economy in the world right now, the creation of millions and millions of jobs, just an extraordinary record to run on. So, they’re going to come up with some cheap shots like that. To me, Wolf, it reminds me of the kind of gender-based cheap shots they took at Hillary Clinton when she ran for president, and now there are all these age-based cheap shots that they’re taking on [Joe Biden]. And it does show you how desperate they are, because you could turn them around and use all the same ones against Donald Trump, who is fumbling his way through every day trying to figure out who he’s attacking this day or that and which case based on his criminal conduct he’s attending.”


Special Counsel Finds Joe Biden ‘Willfully Retained’ Classified Docs — but Is Too Mentally Feeble to Prosecute

Joe Biden Classified Docs
Ting Shen/Bloomberg via Getty Images, DOJ

Special Counsel Robert Hur will not charge President Joe Biden for his handling of classified documents but included stunning revelations in his report of the deterioration of Biden’s mental state that are perhaps more politically damning.

The report says the investigation “uncovered evidence that President Biden willfully retained and disclosed classified materials after his vice presidency when he was a private citizen” but does not establish guilt “beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Source: DOJ

Yet Hur’s assessment of Biden’s “significantly limited” memory also played a part in his decision not to prosecute.

“We have also considered that, at trial, Mr. Biden would likely present himself to a jury, as he did during our interview of him, as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory,” the report states. “Based on our direct interactions with and observations of him, he is someone for whom many jurors will want to identify reasonable doubt.”

“It would be difficult to convince a jury that they should convict him — by then a former president well into his eighties — of a serious felony that requires a mental state of willfulness.”

Source: DOJ

Hur’s report is riddled with examples and assessments that Biden’s mental faculties and memory have deteriorated, saying, “Mr. Biden’s memory also appeared to have significant limitations.”

Shockingly, the report says, “He did not remember, even within several years, when his son Beau died.”

Biden has often spoken about his son Beau’s death from brain cancer, on numerous occasions attributing his death to dying in Iraq.

Perhaps most damning is Biden’s inability to remember his time as vice president:

In his interview with our office… He did not remember when he was vice president, forgetting on the first day of the interview when his term ended (“if it was 2013, when did I stop being Vice President?”), and forgetting on the second day of the interview when his term began (“in 2009, am I still Vice President?”).

Despite Hur’s assessment of a prosecution’s chances in court — which mirror the justifications not to charge Hillary Clinton in 2016 — the evidence presented in the report leaves no doubt of Biden’s at-best sloppy handling of classified documents.

Source: DOJ

“Among the places Mr. Biden’s lawyers found classified documents in the garage was a damaged, opened box containing numerous hanging folders, file folders, and binders. The box…was in a mangled state,” the report reads.

The report also revealed evidence that Biden disclosed classified information to the ghostwriter of his book.

The report’s release comes amid renewed questions about Biden’s mental health. In 2024, Biden has described recent conversations with foreign leaders who died many years ago.

Bradley Jaye is a Capitol Hill Correspondent for Breitbart News. Follow him on X/Twitter at @BradleyAJaye.

Biden classified docs probe ends with charges unlikely, attorney general says

Biden classified docs probe ends with charges unlikely, attorney general says
UPI

Feb. 7 (UPI) — The special counsel investigation of classified documents found at President Joe Biden’s residences has concluded with no charges likely, Attorney General Merrick Garland said Wednesday.

Special counsel Robert Hur ended his investigation and submitted his report to the Justice Department on Monday, Garland reported to House and Senate leaders.

A White House privilege review hasn’t concluded, but Garland said the Justice Department will make “as much of the special counsel’s report public as possible.”

He said the Department of Justice will provide members of Congress with the report, appendices and Hur’s letter after the White House review is done.

The investigation largely involves Biden’s retention of classified documents while he was vice president and after leaving office in January 2017.

Biden allegedly retained the documents in error instead of returning them to the National Archives and Records Administration, CBS News reported.

The classified documents were placed in two storage units and eventually wound up in a private office used by Biden. Some documents also were found in boxes inside Biden’s garage at his home in Wilmington, Del.

A search of Biden’s Rehoboth Beach house in Delaware and at the University of Delaware did not locate more documents.

An additional 10 classified documents were found at the Penn-Biden Center for Diplomacy and Global Engagement in Washington, D.C., which prompted Garland to appoint Hur to investigate Biden’s handling of classified documents in January 2023, ABC News reported.

The classified documents date to Biden’s time as vice president under President Barack Obama, and several were marked as “top secret.”

The investigation by Hur included interviewing about 100 former and current White House and governmental employees. Hur also interviewed Hunter Biden and spent two days interviewing the president.

Biden has told reporters he was surprised to learn of the classified documents in his possession and denied breaking any federal laws.

Meanwhile, former President Donald Trump has been indicted on 40 counts of illegally possessing classified documents. Trump pleaded innocent to the charges against him and accused Justice Department officials of targeting Republicans.

Officials with the National Archives reported that Biden and his legal representatives cooperated with its search for missing classified documents but said Trump and his representatives intentionally withheld classified documents from investigators and the FBI.

Joe Biden Pressured Merrick Garland to Prosecute Donald Trump, Resurfaced NYT Report Says  

WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 16: U.S. Vice President Joe Biden congratulates Judge Merrick Garla
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

President Joe Biden pressured Attorney General Merrick Garland in 2022 to prosecute former President Donald Trump, a resurfaced New York Times report says.

The report, which reemerged Thursday on X, appears to be attracting attention because of the recent legal attacks against Trump:

  • Colorado – Prohibiting Trump from Colorado’s 2024 primary ballot
  • New York – “Stormy Daniels” (state)
  • Miami – “Documents” (federal)
  • Washington, D.C. – “January 6” (federal)
  • Fulton County, Georgia (state)

Times reporters Katie Benner, Katie Rogers, and Michael S. Schmidt published an article on April 2, 2022, about Biden’s frustration with Garland about the lack of prosecution against Trump, according to two people familiar with Biden’s comments.

“The attorney general’s deliberative approach has come to frustrate Democratic allies of the White House and, at times, President Biden himself,” the Times reported. “As recently as late last year, Mr. Biden confided to his inner circle that he believed former President Donald J. Trump was a threat to democracy and should be prosecuted, according to two people familiar with his comments.”

“And while the president has never communicated his frustrations directly to Mr. Garland, he has said privately that he wanted Mr. Garland to act less like a ponderous judge and more like a prosecutor who is willing to take decisive action over the events of Jan. 6,” the report added.

Since the report was originally published, state and federal officials have indicted Trump four times. He faces 91 counts and 717.5 years in jail, Breitbart News reported.

Trump also faces challenges to remaining on state ballots in some blue states. On Tuesday the Colorado Supreme Court ruled in a four-to-three opinion that the United States Constitution’s “Insurrection Clause” blocks Trump from appearing on the state’s presidential ballot, preventing voters from deciding who should become the next president.

“Is Trump an insurrectionist, sir?” a reporter asked Biden Wednesday.

Biden mumbled, “I think … it’s self-evident.” He continued, “Whether the Fourteenth Amendment applies, we’ll let the Court make that decision.”

“But he certainly supported an insurrection,” Biden claimed without evidence. “No question about it. None. Zero.”

Follow Wendell Husebø on “X” @WendellHusebø. He is the author of Politics of Slave Morality.


No comments: