HALF THE POPULATION OF MELTDOWN CA WAS BORN IN MEXICO. THIS STATE HANDS OUT $50 BILLION PER YEAR IN SOCIAL SERVICES TO ILLEGALS WHEN STATE, COUNTY AND CITY FUNDS ARE COMBINED.
Pelosi: Biden Should Have Called Suspect in Laken Riley Murder Undocumented, Not Illegal
Representative Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) said Thursday on CNN’s coverage of the State of the Union address that President Joe Biden should have called the suspect in the murder of Laken Riley, a 22-year-old nursing student “undocumented” instead of “illegal.”
Biden said, “Laken Riley an innocent young woman who was killed by an illegal. That’s right. But how many of the thousands of people being killed by illegals? To her parents, I say my heart goes out to you having lost children myself, i understand.”
Pelosi said, “He should have said undocumented, but it’s not a big thing.”
Anchor Dana Bash said, “I actually wasn’t even going to ask about that. I was just going to ask more about the moment. But you do think that he should have sent undocumented? That wasn’t going to be my question.”
Pelosi said, “Well, we usually say undocumented, he said illegal. I don’t think it’s a big deal. Okay. I don’t think it’s a big deal, but but more broadly, because I think the his focus was on the sympathy for the family.”
Follow Pam Key on Twitter @pamkeyNEN
OPEN BORDERS TO KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED
New study says high housing costs, low income push Californians into homelessness
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o4guGq6kWxg
CA makes up third of homeless population in U.S., according to study
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5OCZZF3_Yas
Study: More than 7-in-10 California Immigrant
Welfare
More than 7-in-10 households headed by immigrants in the state of California are on taxpayer-funded welfare, a new study reveals.
The latest Census Bureau data analyzed by the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) finds that about 72 percent of households headed by noncitizens and immigrants use one or more forms of taxpayer-funded welfare programs in California — the number one immigrant-receiving state in the U.S.
Meanwhile, only about 35 percent of households headed by native-born Americans use welfare in California.
All four states with the largest foreign-born populations, including California, have extremely high use of welfare by immigrant households. In Texas, for example, nearly 70 percent of households headed by immigrants use taxpayer-funded welfare. Meanwhile, only about 35 percent of native-born households in Texas are on welfare.
In New York and Florida, a majority of households headed by immigrants and noncitizens are on welfare. Overall, about 63 percent of immigrant households use welfare while only 35 percent of native-born households use welfare.
President Trump’s administration is looking to soon implement a policy that protects American taxpayers’ dollars from funding the mass importation of welfare-dependent foreign nationals by enforcing a “public charge” rule whereby legal immigrants would be less likely to secure a permanent residency in the U.S. if they have used any forms of welfare in the past, including using Obamacare, food stamps, and public housing.
The immigration controls would be a boon for American taxpayers in the form of an annual $57.4 billion tax cut — the amount taxpayers spend every year on paying for the welfare, crime, and schooling costs of the country’s mass importation of 1.5 million new, mostly low-skilled legal immigrants.
As Breitbart News reported, the majority of the more than 1.5 million foreign nationals entering the country every year use about 57 percent more food stamps than the average native-born American household. Overall, immigrant households consume 33 percent more cash welfare than American citizen households and 44 percent more in Medicaid dollars. This straining of public services by a booming 44 million foreign-born population translates to the average immigrant household costing American taxpayers $6,234 in federal welfare.
John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on Twitter at @JxhnBinder.
California approves ‘shocking’ policy giving weekly checks to migrants: Report
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGCsB3LL1Nw
The state of California is home to more illegal aliens than any other state in the country. Approximately one in five illegal aliens lives in California, Pew reported.
Immigration Studies (CIS) finds that about 72 percent of households headed by noncitizens and immigrants use one or more forms of taxpayer-funded welfare programs in California — the number one immigrant-receiving state in the U.S.
“The Democrats had abandoned their working-class base to chase what they pretended was a racial group when what they were actually chasing was the momentum of unlimited migration”. DANIEL GREENFIELD
Liberal California Emigrants are Toxic
When Arizona, a state that has historically leaned conservative, was won by Joe Biden and now-senator Mark Kelly this week, very few were taken by surprise. Extensive polling indicated Arizona was ripe for swinging liberal and in this instance, at least, the polling was correct.
The question is why? Why has a state that held two elected Republican senators as recently as 2018 and which held a dependable stable of electoral votes for GOP presidential candidates become a purple state on its way to becoming solidly blue? Have Arizona residents suddenly awaked to the idea that liberal policies and doctrines are more sensible than conservative ones? Hardly.
The answer regarding Arizona’s swing lies in its neighbor to the west, California. Since 2012, California has overwhelmingly sent more transplants to Arizona than any other state. When surveyed, escaping Californians cite high taxes, high crime rates, unaffordable housing, out-of-control homelessness, and high unemployment rates as their top reasons for fleeing.
Who is responsible for creating such an alarming living environment within the state? California liberals. A November, 2020 report produced by the Mercatus Center at George Mason University stated that California has 395,608 regulatory restrictions. The sheer volume and scope of California regulations creates such a compliance nightmare that they kill entire industries, send housing prices to unattainable heights, and restrict even commonplace liberties for which conservative leaning states are known.
Piled onto California’s endless river of regulations are its nonsensical laws and policies. Twenty major metropolitan cities or counties in California have established laws, ordinances, regulations, or other practices that shield illegal immigrants from prosecution after committing a crime. These counties brazenly safeguard illegal immigrant criminals against deportation either through noncompliance or by refusing to hand them over to federal agencies such as ICE. With over $1.5 trillion in state and local government debt, California effectively has little money to spare for conveniences such as criminal incarceration. What do sanctuary cities and counties see as the alternative to handing illegal immigrant criminals over for deportation? Release them back into the general population, of course.
Consider this: Between 2014 and 2017, the FBI reported that 49 states saw an average increase in crime annually of around 3%. After implementing “humane” alternatives to criminal prosecution, California crime increased more than 12% per year over the same time period. With irrational sanctuary policies that send a clear message of little to no consequence for offenses, is it any wonder California’s crime rate is now spiraling out of control?
Arizona is not the only beneficiary of the California exodus. The Colorado State Demography Office has published an active flow map of people moving into the state from 2010 on. Disturbingly, the state sending the most movers to Colorado since then has consistently been California. As recently as 2004, Colorado had the political trifecta of a Republican governor and a Republican-controlled House and Senate. A short ten years later, all three had turned irrevocably Democrat. The subsequent consequence? A drastic increase in state and local regulations, a dramatic increase in violent crimes, a severe shortage of home
‘What the F*ck?’: Leftists Livid with Biden for Saying ‘Illegal’ Migrant, Omitting ‘Abortion’ in SOTU
Far-left Democrats are livid with President Biden for apparently not being politically correct enough during his State of the Union address.
Biden called an illegal migrant an “illegal” and failed to use the word “abortion,” two alleged mistakes that caused the far left to lash out.
Biden used the word “illegal” as a noun in reference to the illegal immigrant who allegedly killed Laken Riley.
Noting Biden’s use of the word “illegal,” Las Americas Executive Director Marisa Limon Garza told Politico Playbook, “It was painful. And likely off-script.”
“At best, it’s like when my father, a septuagenarian, makes an unintentional gaffe or foible. At worst, it’s a tired, racist trope. Either way, he needs to do better,” she added.
“He should have said ‘undocumented,’” Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) told CNN after the debate.
U.S. Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) whispers to Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-NY) during a joint meeting of Congress in the House chamber at the U.S. Capitol on March 7, 2024, in Washington, DC, where President Joe Biden delivered his last State of the Union address before the general election this coming November. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty)
Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-TX) claimed Biden’s remark was “dangerously close to language from Donald Trump that puts a target on the backs of Latinos everywhere.”
Biden also failed to use the word “abortion,” which enraged some members of the far left.
“He can say ‘cease-fire’ and not ‘abortion.’ What the fuck?” one abortion activist told Playbook.
In Biden’s prepared remarks, he was supposed to say “abortion,” but he apparently omitted the word and instead spoke about reproductive health, a phrase Democrats use to politically spin the controversial issue.
Biden did, however, use his remarks about the topic of abortion to scold Supreme Court Justices sitting before him.
“In its decision to overturn Roe v. Wade the Supreme Court majority wrote, ‘Women are not without electoral or political power.’ Clearly those bragging about overturning Roe v. Wade have no clue about the power of women in America,” Biden claimed.
“If you, the American people, send me a Congress that supports the right to choose, I promise you, I will restore Roe v. Wade as the law of the land again,” he added.
Wendell Husebo is a political reporter with Breitbart News and a former GOP War Room Analyst. He is the author of Politics of Slave Morality. Follow Wendell on “X” @WendellHusebø or on Truth Social @WendellHusebo.
No comments:
Post a Comment