Dem Sen. Kelly: ‘Confident’ Biden Will Win Arizona with More Votes than 2020
Senator Mark Kelly (D-AZ) said Wednesday on MSNBC’s “The Last Word” that he was “confident” President Joe Biden will win in Arizona by more votes than he got in 2020.
Kelly said, “With Donald Trump in the White House, I mean, we saw during his administration, he cared about tax cuts for the wealthy and taking away, reproductive rights for women. I mean, that was the agenda. President Biden is taking this country forward, not backwards.”
In Arizona, Biden said, “He says immigrants are poisoning the blood of our country, what the hell is he talking about? I need you. I need you badly. I need the help. Kamala and I desperately need your help. Look. there’s only about six or seven states you’re going to turn down coming in this election. They’re tossup states in this election. This is one of them.”
Host Lawrence O’Donnell said, “The pressure is on, in Arizona. How do you see the Biden campaign, winning Arizona this time time.”
Kelly said, “The president won Arizona by 10,000 votes. He can do that again. He’s got a record to run on like the bipartisan infrastructure bill. President Trump didn’t do anything that bipartisan. So this president is going to move the country forward. I think Arizonans get that. When you consider Trump’s language about migrants. And my response to that is it’s just un-American. Joe Biden knows who we are. I’m confident here’s going to win in Arizona. He won by 10,000 votes. I’m going to make sure he wins by more in the 2024 election.”
Follow Pam Key on Twitter @pamkeyNEN
Gary Franks: Democrats are planning to use today’s illegal immigrants to help them win elections for decades to come
Illegal immigrants have not and will not be entering America with a platinum healthcare insurance plan. All will be without healthcare coverage. Yes, that equals millions of illegal immigrants. So, they will have Uncle Sam as their healthcare provider – we call it Medicaid (healthcare for the indigent). And it costs us billions.
Are there any Americans who would agree to pay more taxes in order to pay for the influx of illegal immigrants? Well, we cannot continue to put it on Uncle Sam’s credit card either.
For the sake of our nation, Republicans must hold the line, fund our government but do not provide foreign assistance for those protecting their borders until Biden takes one, if not all, of following three steps to secure America’s border:
1. Use executive orders to secure our border
2. Return to the border security policies that were working under the prior administration
3. Use the military to protect and secure our border
The Republican Senate leadership’s failure and now House Speaker Mike Johnson’s wavering, could give President Joe Biden and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer a lifeline. House Republicans, led by Speaker Johnson, negotiated, and got absolutely nothing.
They are poised to cave on forcing Biden to protect our border with Mexico, giving Biden and Schumer a total victory for funding the security needs of other countries. With one finger in the air, Biden and Schumer said accept our crappy border deal from the Senate or get nothing. Yes, it is the proverbial “take it or leave it” diplomacy.
Last year the growth of Medicaid was three times the rate of inflation – nearly 10%. It currently stands at a cost of $800 billion and at its current rate will soon eclipse $1 trillion.
We already have to borrow $1.75 every time we buy that $6.20 coffee. We simply do not have the money, Mr. Biden – but you already know that.
Our top money man Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell has stated that the course we are on financially is unsustainable. Maybe we should listen to him.
Individually, our nation’s financial plight has rippling negative effects – high interest rates being one of the biggest ripples. For instance, due partially to high interest rates, home foreclosures are up, business and personal bankruptcies are up 16.8%, and credit card debt is at an all-time high, a whopping $1.02 trillion. These are all facts not widely reported by our liberal media.
So why would Biden and the Democrats push America more rapidly toward the financial cliff? Paramount for them is winning elections.
But Democrats have a problem with this. They have not won the white vote in over 50 years. Yes, they have lost the white vote in every single presidential election since Lyndon Johnson.
So their “Plan B” is to let the mess happen at the Mexican border. They want the flow of illegal immigrants to swell into the millions, knowing that these immigrants will eventually be included in the census and vote. That’s sad.
The cat is out of the bag, however.
That is the reason the Democrats “recruit” new voters so the party can create a clearer path to victory in the decades to come. But do not call these folks “illegals”!
Democrats are offended when their ploy is revealed. They are also offended when people come to America in a non-legal way and are referred to as “illegal immigrants.” They are immigrants and they are crossing into America with no regard for our laws. That is the definition of an illegal immigrant.
The not-so-secret Democrat model and plan goes like this… Abraham Lincoln freed the slaves and won for the Republicans a near unanimous vote of Black people for decades thereafter. Biden and the Democrats wrongfully believed that Hispanics would do the same thanks to the party’s strong support of immigrants. But this is not happening, however.
Why not? Well, having 400 years of slavery for Black people, freedom in America trumps merely wanting a new job in America for Hispanic people. Loyalty to the liberator of the slaves creates a unique bond.
Regarding elections, flipping Texas would make it nearly impossible for Republicans to win at the electoral college level in the future. Arizona, Nevada, and New Mexico could also fall permanently in the Democrat column.
Thanks to Texas Gov. Greg Abbott’s approach of sending illegal immigrants to Democrat states, the likelihood decreases for the Democrats to gain politically. It was a brilliant move by Abbott. History may show that he played a key role in saving the nation.
Biden, the stubborn, octogenarian, and 50-year political pro, is willing to risk the wellbeing of millions of people around the world in order to keep the water flowing, the flow of illegal immigrants moving across our southern border. He has refused to lift a finger – despite the U.S. Constitution which clearly states that “the United States must protect each state from an invasion.” Don’t forget the Democrats would say, “It depends on the meaning of ‘invasion’?”
In polls, a vast majority of Americans feel it is an invasion. Illegal immigrants are being weaponized to bring down America financially. The numbers of invaders and Biden’s inaction are historic.
To end the invasion, suffice it to say: “Where there is a will, there's a way.” The problem for the Democrats is that there is no “will” to do so. Their policy is tragic and financially costly for America, but it may win votes for Democrats into the future.
_____
ABOUT THE WRITER
____
Gary Franks served three terms as U.S. representative for Connecticut’s 5th District. He was the first Black Republican elected to the House in nearly 60 years and New England’s first Black member of the House. Host: podcast "We Speak Frankly." Author: "With God, For God, and For Country." @GaryFranks
How Many Millions of Illegal Aliens in the Country Does the Democrat Party Need to Destroy America?
I entered duty with the U.S. Border Patrol in 1995, back when there were only 5,000 people (Agents and support personnel) in all of the USBP. I was the Director of the Aircraft Maintenance Facility in Del Rio, Texas in the Del Rio Border Patrol Sector
My guys maintained Piper Super Cubs and Aerospatiale A-Star AS-350 helicopters for our cadre of pilots. Back then, the Chief Pilot and I collected daily Air Operations performance data. The pilots annotated (after flight) on their flight logs how many aerial-assisted apprehensions (APPs) they performed as well as the number of GOT AWAYs pilots counted from the air. Such as, Border Patrol Agents performing flying duties would detect and follow tracks in the desert, (called “cutting sign”) and when those tracks stopped or disappeared, such as at a paved road where a groups of illegal aliens were picked up, those tracks left in the desert were counted as GOT AWAYs.
The Chief Patrol Agent of Air Operations at El Paso collected the data from each of the ten Border Patrol Sectors’ Air Operations and published the data as “Measures of Performance” as required by the Government Accountability Office. Monthly and annual reports went to Congress, the Chief of the Border Patrol, the I&NS Commissioner, and because the Border Patrol was part of the DOJ at the time, the Attorney General.
The annual report was fairly uniform across all of Border Patrol Air Ops - -Border Patrol Pilots conducted about a million aerial-assisted apprehensions per year and counted, across all Sectors, about two million GOT AWAYs.
After 9-11, when the Department of Homeland Security was created and the Border Patrol was wrapped up with the U.S. Customs Service, I assumed the newly formed Customs and Border Patrol Air and Marine (CBP) still collected “Measures of Effectiveness” data or something similar under a new name.
When I moved to Washington, D.C., no longer with the Border Patrol, every year I heard reports from the networks or in the Washington Times reports of the number of illegal aliens in the country, and every year I would say B.S. because I had been there in Del Rio, collecting annual performance data, where the numbers of APPs and GOT AWAYs remained fairly uniform, 1 million apprehensions and 2 million GOT AWAYs, even when the Border Patrol grew to 20,000 Agents.
But noteworthy, every year the various media reported there were about 10 million illegal aliens in the country. It was an anecdotal data point that could not be researched.
When President Trump came into office, and his efforts to secure the border were put into place, I assumed the number of apprehensions and GOT AWAYs would go down. My 2018 American Thinker article, Real Walls Prevent Illegal Border Crossings discussed the different political strategies of “walls.”
And I noticed something funny; that there were still magically 10 million illegal aliens in the country. Every once in a while, someone on the news would say there were more, but never less and never citing a solid reference, like an annual “Measures of Effectiveness” report, it was a just a SWAG -- silly wild ass guess
But over the last three years, President Biden and the DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas assured America that there was no crisis and the “border was secure,” even when video after video of Del Rio Sector Stations (Del Rio and Eagle Pass, specifically) were massing on the Mexican border before overrunning Border Patrol Stations with countless numbers of illegal aliens crossing the Rio Grande and entering the U.S. through removed or opened border barriers.
The Democrats and the media just engaged in military-grade propaganda.
It may be possible Trump’s policies and wall construction projects prevented millions of apprehensions and GOT AWAYs every year only to be reversed by Biden when he moved into the White House.
In my October 2023 American Thinker article, Democrats Plot to Turn Texas Blue, the Democrats are welcoming foreign invaders into the country in violation of established law for a simple reason; to change the dynamics of the next election. President Ulysses S. Grant would call their actions traitorous. (From the Grant quote: There are now two parties, traitors and patriots.)
What is happening in America reminds me of the political situation in 1917 and the Russian Revolution; there was a schism between the Bolsheviks (majority party) and Mensheviks (minority party) where the Bolsheviks eventually crushed and outlawed the Mensheviks. One party rule in Russia introduced the country to communism.
By my calculations, since 1995, the Border Patrol had probably performed as many as 25-30 million illegal alien apprehensions (where some were removed and some criminal aliens went to jail), and if you assume the number of GOT AWAYs was linear year over year, with the exception of the Trump years, there seems there may have been as many as 40 to 60 million GOT AWAYs; the actual number that are in the country isn’t known, ten million seems to be a farcical number, but however many are in the United States they are just a single signature away from getting amnesty. Meaning today’s illegal alien is tomorrow’s Democrat voter.
Even if there isn’t an immediate amnesty, many of the illegal aliens being let in will have access to illegal weapons and can form terrorist cells. Do not think illegal aliens are peaceful; that is Democrat and media propaganda. Laken Riley is just the latest abduction/rape/murder by an illegal alien. Only a moron would think her death was a unique occurrence. As long as the border is unsecured, there will be many more illegal aliens committing rapes and murders.
The full treachery of the Democrat party is now on display as some idiot Democrat members of Congress are suggesting, “let them into the military, let them become police, let them vote.” Democrats must believe they have enough illegal aliens in the country now to ensure they will always remain in power. Democrats have become the majority Bolshevik party; the neutralization of Republicans is nearly complete. They are one signature away from making it impossible for Republicans to compete in any election, and one-party communist rule will dominate.
Which means the Constitution and the Second Amendment will be shredded. The hated NRA will be abolished and Republicans will be disarmed. That’s the Democrats’ plan.
Because, if you give illegal aliens money, schools, licenses, homes, hotel rooms, cell phones, and the vote, they will vote for the criminals who let them into the country. It’s obvious when you have a critical mass of newly potential Democrat voters.
History will show that the Democrats' plan to destroy the Constitution, justice system and the military from within was on track until Donald Trump got elected. Remember Obama’s “fundamentally transforming the country,” Hillary’s missing emails, Huma Abedin’s boxes of “Muslim Outreach” documents, as well as Joe’s boxes of classified documents he “willingly retained.” Hundreds of articles were written on what Obama, Hillary, Huma, and Joe had done: sabotage, espionage, and treason, that is until the very compromised FBI running top cover for Democrats say it wasn’t.
Washington and blue state Democrats, America’s domestic enemies, are stealing America. Trump was supposed to be neutralized, but Democrats find themselves in a race to stop Trump’s second term. If he is reelected, there will be a political bloodbath. Trump will not allow domestic terrorists and criminals to run roughshod over the country.
Trump has had to learn the hard way what triggered the Democrats response and what they were truly up to. President Trump didn’t have the benefit of a war college education where he would have learned what Clausewitz observed: Politics is combat by other means. Trump is being bombarded today with every bogus charge the Democrats can muster to stop him.
The governors of Texas and Florida recognized the federal government was attacking them with military-age invaders. These deep red states are on the front lines and are doing what they can to protect their state; moving military-age illegal aliens out of those states where they can be welcomed in a blue sanctuary city and no longer a threat to Texas and Florida residents.
The Democrat’s Ministry of Propaganda, the DHS-media complex, is trying to leverage every psychological operational trick in the book to influence the narrative: there is no invasion, the border is secure, and there are only a few million “climate refugees” in the country. The liberal media has been disingenuous and hysterical; Fox News and the alternate media are reporting relentlessly, with live video from the border, essentially reverse engineering Democrat propaganda.
Are Americans waking up to the fact that Washington Democrats are domestic terrorists who have not only lied to them on what is happening at the border but that there was another purpose to Biden opening the border to invaders? Destroy the Republican Party, create one party rule, and welcome a communist government.
WE'RE GONNA PUT YOU OUT FUKER JOE! OUT TO GITMO!
RFK Jr.: Biden Suspended Free Speech
RFK Jr.: Why Our Economy Is Headed For Collapse
Report: Biden Administration Relying on Democrat ‘Influencers’ Who Created ‘Bloodbath’ Hoax
Democrat social media “influencers” affiliated with the White House created the “bloodbath” hoax — the misleading claim that former President Donald Trump called for a “bloodbath” of political violence if he is not elected, according to a report.
“Acyn,” an anonymous senior digital editor for the activist liberal news site MeidasTouch.com, first made a video clip of Trump’s speech from Ohio, in which the former president warned of an economic bloodbath for the United States auto industry due to Chinese manufacturing.
WATCH — Fake News Freakout! Leftist Media Hoax over Trump’s “Bloodbath” Comment… What Did He Actually Say?:
However, instead of showing Trump’s full remarks, they were presented out of context to suggest that Trump was referring to political violence if he is not elected.
According to Semafor, Democrats “leaped to demand news outlets cover it as a major story that underscored Trump’s violent intentions.”
Despite backlash for the hoax being misleading, the official rapid-response X account for the Joe Biden-Kamala Harris 2024 campaign pushed the hoax in a number of posts and then turned the moment into a campaign ad.
According to the report, the Biden White House has embraced Acyn and other social media influencers pushing out misleading content about Trump, even inviting Acyn and his boss, Ron Filipkowski, and other social media influencers such as Aaron Rupar, to “talk strategy” before the State of the Union.
They were reportedly given a preview of the speech, and spoke with White House strategist Anita Dunn and Second Gentleman Doug Emhoff about the president’s agenda.
Anita Dunn (L) at the U.S. Capitol on July 22, 2021, in Washington, DC. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Dunn praised Filipkowski, Rupar, and other influencers to Semafor:
We need to be creative and move fast to contrast the President’s optimistic agenda for the future with the extreme agenda of Republican officials who want to take us back in time… . Aaron, Ron, and many others are on the front lines of making sure the American people know the truth of what is at stake.
Filipkowski told the outlet that one of his goals was to change the “storyline” of Biden’s “presidential feebleness,” by highlighting Trump gaffes.
“The Meidas guys, as a team, said: We are going to do this to Trump,” Filipkowski told Semafor:
We are going to hit every gaffe, every mispronunciation, every slurred word, every mispronounced name, every time he mixes up a name. We’re going to clip that and we’re going to put it out and we’re going to put it in montages. No one else was doing that. Before last August, you can’t find a mainstream media story about Trump mispronouncing and slurring words. They weren’t out there.
The Intercept’s Ryan Grim reportedly criticized Rupar and other similar social media influencers as “Trump’s most valuable weapons,” for highlighting quotes that Trump could spin away — such as the misleading “bloodbath” hoax.
Grim reportedly called Rupar “a threat to the free press, undermining honest reporters by presenting himself as a journalist but behaving as a partisan hack.”
Follow Breitbart News’s Kristina Wong on ”X”, Truth Social, or on Facebook.
America First Legal: Biden Administration Actively Supports Foreign Censorship Campaigners
Evidence uncovered by America First Legal reveals that the Biden Administration’s Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and State Department have been actively supporting a foreign-based organization in its efforts to censor Americans’ speech online.
America First Legal, a nonprofit organization dedicated to promoting the rule of law, has recently exposed a disturbing collaboration between the Biden Administration and the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), a United Kingdom-based nonprofit that has been encouraging online censorship for years. The evidence suggests that the Biden Administration has been mobilizing federal counterterrorism assets to support CCDH’s global censorship campaign, raising serious concerns about the government’s role in suppressing free speech.
According to the documents obtained by America First Legal, the Biden Administration’s National Security Council published its first-ever National Strategy for Countering Domestic Terrorism on June 15, 2021. The strategy asserted that “Internet-based communications platforms” make Americans vulnerable to “domestic terrorist recruitment and other harmful content,” effectively justifying censorship and turning to the national security state and allied technology companies to censor political opponents.
The Biden Administration’s strategy involved building a community of “critical partners,” including foreign allies, civil society, and the technology sector, to control information and promote censorship. The administration endorsed the Christchurch Call to Action, an international initiative to eliminate “terrorist and violent extremist content online,” which the Trump Administration had previously refused on free speech grounds.
CCDH, led by leftist political operative Imran Ahmed, has been a key player in this censorship campaign. The organization is best known for its March 24, 2021 report, “THE DISINFORMATION DOZEN,” which branded 12 Americans, including Robert F. Kennedy Jr., as “anti-vaxxers” and called for their blacklisting online. The Missouri v. Biden case revealed that White House officials quickly pressured social media companies to act on this report.
Emails obtained by America First Legal show that DHS Under Secretary Robert Silvers and CCDH’s then-Head of Policy, Eva Hartshorn-Sanders, connected in March 2022 to discuss CCDH’s research and the DHS’s strategies and plans. Hartshorn-Sanders also invited Silvers and the DHS Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Counterterrorism to CCDH’s Global Summit and Changemakers Dinner.
By September 2022, CCDH was directly meeting with officials from the White House, the National Security Council, and the State Department’s Bureau of Counterterrorism, updating them with CCDH’s latest findings and submitting policy recommendations to the White House Task Force to Address Online Harassment and Abuse.
The mobilization of federal counterterrorism assets to promote censorship and suppress dissenting voices is a clear threat to the First Amendment and the fundamental principles of free speech, and the evidence uncovered by America First Legal raises alarming questions about the Biden Administration’s involvement in supporting a foreign organization’s efforts to censor American speech.
Read more at America First Legal here.
Lucas Nolan is a reporter for Breitbart News covering issues of free speech and online censorship.
House Majority Whip Signals Biden’s Overtly Political SOTU May Have Blown Up Tradition
House Majority Whip Rep. Tom Emmer (R-MN) suggested this weekend that Democrat President Joe Biden’s overtly political State of the Union address may have disintegrated the tradition of presidents being invited to deliver the annual speech before the House chamber.
While Republicans, including Emmer — who has endorsed former President Donald Trump, the presumptive GOP nominee in 2024 — hope Trump defeats Biden in November, if somehow Biden comes back and wins the election this year, Emmer said that House Republicans might not welcome Biden back for a State of the Union address next year.
“That was about the most divisive State of the Union — I wouldn’t extend him an invitation next year, if that’s what we’re going to get,” Emmer said in an interview with Axios published on Sunday.
This may set things down a slippery slope, too, whereby Republicans do not invite Democrat presidents to give a State of the Union address and vice versa in divided government.
President Joe Biden delivers the State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress at the Capitol, Thursday, March 7, 2024, in Washington. (Shawn Thew/Pool via AP)
In Biden’s speech, he attacked Trump more than a dozen times — repeatedly calling Trump “my predecessor” throughout the speech. Biden also laid out an aggressively leftist agenda replete with tax increases, more spending, radical border and immigration policies, and even for sending U.S. military forces into Gaza to build a port to send aid there. Biden, in addition, regularly attacked the Republicans in the chamber.
Nonetheless, Emmer’s argument extends even beyond Biden continuing as president and said that Congress should reconsider welcoming a president to deliver a speech to give their State of the Union update to Congress. For many years throughout U.S. history, a State of the Union address from the president to Congress just simply did not happen. In fact, while George Washington — the nation’s first president — did address Congress in person, it was not until President Woodrow Wilson in 1913 that presidents began appearing in person before Congress to give what has become known as the State of the Union address.
U.S. House Majority Whip Tom Emmer (R-MN) speaks to reporters as he leaves a House Republican candidates forum on October 23, 2023, in Washington, DC. (Win McNamee/Getty Images)
“Since Washington’s first speech to Congress, U.S. Presidents have ‘from time to time’ given Congress an assessment of the condition of the union. Presidents have used the opportunity to present their goals and agenda through broad ideas or specific details. The annual message or ‘State of the Union’ message’s length, frequency, and method of delivery have varied from President to President and era to era,” the White House website from the George W. Bush administration said, explaining the history of the address. “For example, Thomas Jefferson thought Washington’s oral presentation was too kingly for the new republic. Likewise, Congress’s practice of giving a courteous reply in person at the President’s residence was too formal. Jefferson detailed his priorities in his first annual message in 1801 and sent copies of the written message to each house of Congress. The President’s annual message, as it was then called, was not spoken by the President for the next 112 years. The message was often printed in full or as excerpts in newspapers for the American public to read.”
Emmer seemed to suggest that Congress might do well to return to that model of doing business, given the fact that Biden seems to have ruined the tradition with his address this year.
“He’s not going to be there next year — it’ll be a different president,” Emmer told Axios. “But I think you’ve got to rethink issuing invitations for a State of the Union if it’s not going to be a State of the Union, and that was not. That was a campaign speech.”
No comments:
Post a Comment