Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Ronan Farrow said on HBO’s Real Time With Bill Maher, that “credible” accusations of rape had been made against former President Bill Clinton by Juanita Broaddrick, adding that an investigation into the allegations is now “overdue.”
What was that about Epstein having an eight-person "party shower"? Did the Clintons do the "party shower"?
Trump has a track record of success, and Democrats hate him. Joe has a track record of failure, corruption, and creepiness. Well, I guess we know why the Democrats seem to love him.
Ed Buck Will Finally Face Trial, but His Conviction Is Far From Guaranteed
Charged with the
the deaths of two men who overdosed in his apartment, the former Democratic
operative’s path to punishment could be difficult and uncertain
By
on September 11, a black man whom the authorities are calling “Joe
Doe” hurried from a West Hollywood apartment to a nearby gas station and asked
the attendant on duty to call 911. A wealthy older man had injected him with
crystal meth, Doe said, and then refused to call an ambulance when he began
overdosing.
Thus began a chain of events that resulted, at long last, in the
arrest of Ed Buck. By then the longtime Democratic Party operative was the
target of protest vigils, a wrongful death lawsuit, and a TV news stakeout.
Though two black men had been found dead of meth overdoses in his home in a
span of 18 months, and several others were telling investigators that Buck had
brought them into his residence and injected them with a quantity of the drug
that made them lose consciousness, local prosecutors had resisted calls to make
an arrest. The 911 emergency of Joe Doe propelled the case suddenly forward out
of what seemed, at least to observers, an interminable lapse of inertia. Within
days after Doe was discharged from the hospital, Buck was arrested at his home
by L.A. County sheriff’s deputies and booked on state charges in connection
with Doe’s overdose. In Doe, investigators had a witness who had escaped Buck’s
apartment alive, and what he told them gave prosecutors the break they needed
to bring long-awaited charges in what was alleged to be one of the most macabre
L.A. crime sprees in years. At that point, however, local prosecutors had
competition.
Earlier this year, at the invitation of the L.A. County Sheriff’s
Department, a federal drug task force opened an investigation into Buck’s
alleged crimes. Where L.A. County District Attorney Jackie Lacey had previously
judged the evidence insufficient to charge Buck in the two overdose deaths in
his home, the United States attorney in L.A., Nicola Hanna, saw things
differently. In a whiplash turn of events over 48 hours, Buck was arrested,
charged in state court, and then promptly transferred to federal custody and
hit with a new set of charges in the deaths of 26-year-old Gemmel Moore and 55-year-old
Timothy Dean.
This summer, the legal drama of Ed Buck enters its improbable
third act. The notoriety of Buck, once famous as a well-connected political
donor, has long since eclipsed his renown. By the time he was handcuffed and
hauled away from West Hollywood in a sheriff’s vehicle, the name Ed Buck had
come to represent many things to many people: to local prosecutors, he is a
scourge; to black and LGBTQ activists, an avatar of status and privilege; to
the right wing, a cudgel with which to bash the Democrats; and, to black gay
men working as escorts in West Hollywood, a kind of terrifying urban legend
come to life. But while the case against him has progressed, the path to
conviction is difficult and uncertain.
The Buck who appeared in court before federal Judge Frederick F.
Mumm on October 10 was a shadow of the political phenom who arrived in L.A.
three decades ago and became a major player in the local Democratic Party. He
stood, looking drawn and anxious in a loose beige prison smock. When Mumm asked
how he would plead to charges that he supplied the methamphetamine that killed
Moore and Dean, the defendant hesitated for a long moment before responding: “I
am working on one hearing aid. Not guilty.”
Family members of Moore and Dean attended the arraignment and
assembled outside court afterward. Moore’s mother, LaTisha Nixon, later called
Buck a “monster” and dismissed his apparent weakness as an act to gain pity
from the court. The families and their activist supporters have long argued that
Buck led a double life that protected him from the consequences of his alleged
crimes, likening him to a modern-day Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. “This was a
really hard case for people in society and politics to wrap their heads
around,” says Jasmyne Cannick, an L.A.-based media consultant active in the
campaign that called for Buck’s arrest. “Here you have this white man, an
animal rights activist who’s run for office and who seems like he’s a decent
guy, a good person. It was really a Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde situation.”
It’s not as if Buck hadn’t shown occasional glimpses of a darker
side: He has been the subject of several requests for temporary restraining
orders. And on at least two occasions, his vitriolic style convinced deputies
at West Hollywood’s City Hall to escort the targets of his tirades to their
cars after public meetings. Still, even to those who had run afoul of Buck’s
temper, the depth of his fall from grace is astonishing.
“Here you have this white man, an
animal rights activist who’s run for office and who seems like he’s a decent
guy. It was really a Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde situation.”
The Ed Buck of the late 1980s was a charismatic gay political
celebrity who lead a quixotic crusade that helped bring down Evan Mecham, the
rancorous Republican governor of Arizona. The Arizona Republic said Buck was
“destined to go down in history as one of Arizona’s most unlikely political
figures.” After moving to L.A., Buck acclimated quickly, forging political
friendships with area congressmen, members of the state Assembly and the City
Council. He fostered golden retrievers, railed against private development, and
donated handsomely to scores of Democrats, including all but one of the present
members of the West Hollywood City Council.
But the same 65-year-old who had
grinned in photos with Hillary Clinton
and former Governor Jerry Brown was
known to homeless men in WeHo’s
Plummer Park as “Dr. Kevorkian.”
But the same 65-year-old who had
grinned in photos with Hillary Clinton
and former Governor Jerry Brown was
known to homeless men in WeHo’s
Plummer Park as “Dr. Kevorkian.”
Buck was being held in early November without bond at the
Metropolitan Detention Center in downtown L.A. An official with the Federal
Bureau of Prisons declined to discuss the conditions of his confinement except
to say that Buck is not permitted visitors. In state court, where he faces separate
charges of operating a drug den and providing the drugs that caused Joe Doe’s
hospitalization for a drug overdose, Buck wore a protective blue vest, the kind
meant to prevent inmates from killing themselves and protect them from attacks
by other prisoners.
The source of Buck’s wealth has always been shrouded in mystery.
He claimed he retired in his early 30s on proceeds from the “million-dollar”
sale of his business (he owned a service that provided driver’s license
information to auto insurers). A former friend told me that more recently Buck
has lived frugally off investment gains from the stock market. Local
prosecutors put forward a different theory, arguing in a recent filing in state
court that Buck “has no known source of income” and “may be funding his
lifestyle with narcotics trafficking.”
Since 2005 Buck has donated more than a half-million dollars to
political candidates and causes in Los Angeles. Though he was once a registered
Republican in Arizona, nearly all of his donations have been linked to
Democrats since he moved to West Hollywood in 1991. He has cut checks for 40
officeholders in California, including several in L.A. City Hall, the
California Assembly, and Congress, the Los Angeles Times has
reported. Some of those politicos have returned the money
or redirected it to charitable causes after Buck’s arrest. Lacey returned the
$100 donation that Buck made to her 2012 campaign for district attorney. She
has said that she doesn’t know Buck and his modest largesse played no role in
the decision about whether to prosecute him.
Whatever its source, Buck’s fortune seems depleted. Seymour
Amster, the attorney who began representing Buck after the death of Moore, is
not listed as his attorney in the federal case. Facing a possible life sentence
in federal prison, Buck has elected to be represented by a public defender, at
a cost of $500 a month, according to a court filing. Amster has spoken for Buck
in the press, saying that Moore’s death was “a tragedy, not a crime,” which he
attributed to Buck’s having “opened his home to an individual who was
troubled.” He referred to the activist campaign against Buck as “a race war.”
Amster appeared at Buck’s side in state court, but that case is on hold until the
federal case is completed, says a spokesman for the DA’s office. Amster, who
previously defended the serial killer known as the Grim Sleeper, did not
respond to messages seeking comment.
When Moore was found dead in Buck’s apartment in 2017, the initial investigation
by the Sheriff’s Department and coroner’s office treated the overdose as an
accident. A law enforcement source told Los Angeles that this
erroneous assumption contributed to errors that investigators committed at the
scene. A year later, when Lacey decided not to prosecute Buck in Moore’s death,
prosecutors listed “inadmissible search and seizure” as one of the reasons.
Lacey later told a meeting of the Stonewall Democratic Club that investigators
had illegally seized around two grams of methamphetamine from a toolbox in
Buck’s apartment. Federal prosecutors later charged Buck with intentionally
distributing the drugs that killed Moore and Dean and three counts of drug
distribution. They must prove that the drugs provided by Buck were the drugs
that entered into the victims. Court documents in the federal case make no
mention of an illegal search.
Nearly three weeks after Moore’s death the Sheriff’s Department
reopened the investigation as a possible homicide. It happened after Moore’s
mother and a young man who had worked as an escort for Buck aired their
suspicion that Buck had supplied and injected Moore with the drugs that killed
him. Nixon told a local reporter: “[Buck] would have my son … go out to … Santa
Monica Boulevard looking for young gay black guys so he could inject them with
drugs, see their reaction and how [they] would react and take pictures of
them.” The reporter, Ryan Gierach, had known Buck for 14 years and knew of his
meth use. “I needed no convincing,” Gierach said. “Over 13 or 14 years I’ve
seen a man, a vital, vigorous, incredible intellect, descend into a monster.”
Buck had once been a political mentor of sorts to Gierach, opening
doors and giving him inside information until the two had a falling out in 2015
after Buck refused to lend him money. Gierach incorporated Nixon’s lurid
allegations into a news feature that delved into Buck’s prominence in the
Democratic Party and included a recent photo of Buck with Clinton. The Drudge
Report promoted the story. The London tabloid The Daily Mail ran its version
under the headline: “Male prostitute, 26, dies of meth overdose at Hollywood
home of high-profile Democrat donor.” Fox News seemed to embrace the story as a
chance to attack multiple foes at once: Democrats, the Clintons, and Hollywood.
(On the night Buck was arrested, Tucker Carlson reported the story with a photo
showing Buck with Hillary Clinton: “Turns out when Buck wasn’t donating to the
Democrats, he liked to inject young men with narcotics in his living room.”)
“I’ve seen a man, a vital,
vigorous, incredible intellect, descend into a monster.”
Entries from Moore’s personal journal were published in various
news outlets in which he blamed Buck for getting him addicted to crystal meth.
Moore wrote in a December 2016 entry that Buck “gave me my first injection of
chrystal [sic] meth it was very painful, but after all the troubles, I became
addicted to the pain and fetish/fantasy.”
Eighteen months after Moore’s death, Timothy Dean, a fashion
consultant for Saks Fifth Avenue who had performed in adult films, died of a
meth overdose in Buck’s living room. Nine months later Joe Doe fled Buck’s
apartment and ended up being treated at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center for a drug
overdose.
Federal prosecutors have the ability to charge Buck in the two
deaths without having to prove that killing them was his intent. The same
statute is being used to prosecute the men who sold the fentanyl-laced
painkillers that killed rap star Mac Miller. Lacey said in a statement that
“there is no comparable statute in California criminal law that my office could
have used to charge defendant Buck in either of the deaths.”
Investigators eventually gathered testimony from at least nine men
who said that Buck had brought them to his home and insisted that they take
drugs he gave them as compensation for sexual services. Two of them reported
that he had injected drugs into their bodies while they were asleep. One of
those two men is Joe Doe.
With the exception of Doe, local and federal prosecutors have
differed over the credibility of witnesses. Many have puzzled over how Buck had
avoided so much as a drug charge in the case. Nixon’s attorneys in a wrongful
death lawsuit against Buck have suggested that local prosecutors were
influenced by the fact that many of the alleged victims were homeless, black,
and sex workers. The federal trial of Ed Buck was originally scheduled to begin
November 26, but has been moved to next summer.
And there's more than a few indicators that Clinton wasn't
naive at all about Epstein. Though he wasn't accused by Epstein's credible
accuser Virginia Giuffre, Clinton's been accused repeatedly being a sexual
predator by others earlier.
She is incredibly incompetent, fundamentally dishonest, and
criminally corrupt, and these are her good qualities. KENNETH ELIASBERG
Harvey
Weinstein has been exposed in the media as the sexual predator he is, and Hillary
Clinton has been exposed as the craven money-grubber she is; money over
morality is the mantra she lives by. PATRICIA Mc CARTHY
Hillary the Punisher: Ronan Farrow says he was cut dead from
Clinton circles after he exposed Weinstein
Apparently, the queen and her moneymen are not to be
challenged.
Young Ronan Farrow learned that the hard way when he found
out he was persona
non grata from charmed social circles of Hillary Clinton
following his investigation into Hollywood movie producer Harvey Weinstein's
long career of sexual harassment and intimidation, an investigation which won
him the Pulitzer prize.
Which culminates a long road of indignities for the young
man. Seems the threats from Weinstein's minions to him were not enough. Nor was
the rejection he encountered from assorted media organizations who refused to
run his work until the New Yorker finally picked it up. Nope, the punishment
Farrow endured also extended to House Clinton, which cut him dead.
Which, to the rest of us, seems like a good thing, given their
long history of moral turpitude. But to young Ronan, it was another sling and
arrow, because he was a Democrat and that was his social circle.
“It’s remarkable how quickly even people with a long relationship
with you will turn if you threaten the centres of power or the sources of
funding around them,” Farrow told the Financial Times.
“Ultimately, there are a lot of people out there who operate in
that way. They’re beholden to powerful interests and if you go up against those
interests, you become radioactive very quickly,” he said.
Clinton appointed Farrow as her special adviser on global youth
issues in 2011 when she was secretary of state. Farrow said he had worked with
Clinton “for years” when he was looking into the Weinstein story.
Instead of praising young Ronan for standing up for the
interests of sex-harrassed women, for igniting the #MeToo movement, Hillary,
that supposed big champion of women's progress, shut him out, probably
refusing to take his calls, and in his view, solely on the grounds that
one of her most important moneymen was put out of commission. He was dead to
her.
And that tells us a lot more about Clinton than it does about
Farrow.
It's a reminder of Clinton's pay-to-play orientation, and
privilege-of-kings morality. Rules of decency do not apply to her. Women's
rights, or anyone's rights, are window dressing. Money talks. Maybe that
can be brought up next time someone bruits about her name for president again.
Everyone knows she stood by her man, blamed his
women, and perhaps was a psychological co-rapist for the sake of her political
ambitions.
Bill and Hill - and the Evil that Men Do
If you asked one
hundred people what they think about when they hear the name Bill Clinton, a
goodly number will say womanizer, cheater – a few will use the dreadful word
rapist. And that number will increase. Time and neurology are working against
the Clintons.
Most memory training programs are simply a matter of learning how to associate memories with emotionally charged ideas. This is because the brain is designed to remember where the dangers and the goodies lie and to forget the dry statistics. The brain is more inclined to remember Jennifer Flowers than the unemployment rate in 1996. This effect has tainted the collective memory of many presidents, for example, disclosures about the mistresses of Franklin Delano Roosevelt and John Kennedy. This effect will increase for Bill Clinton both because of the outrageous nature of his conduct and the way it has and will be reported.
Most memory training programs are simply a matter of learning how to associate memories with emotionally charged ideas. This is because the brain is designed to remember where the dangers and the goodies lie and to forget the dry statistics. The brain is more inclined to remember Jennifer Flowers than the unemployment rate in 1996. This effect has tainted the collective memory of many presidents, for example, disclosures about the mistresses of Franklin Delano Roosevelt and John Kennedy. This effect will increase for Bill Clinton both because of the outrageous nature of his conduct and the way it has and will be reported.
People tend to cut
quite a bit of slack for the weaknesses of the flesh because there’s a lot of
that going around. But Hillary will gain no benefit from that latitude.
Everyone knows she stood by her man, blamed his women, and perhaps was a
psychological co-rapist for the sake of her political ambitions. Before
the next president is elected, Hillary will not only have an albatross around
her neck, she will be covered with names like Wellstone, Broaddrick, Moffet,
Ward Gracen, Brown, Dowdy, Jones, Ferguson, Zercher, Willey, and more. A majority
of those one hundred people will remember the evil the Clintons did, and their
legacy will be lost in the folds of tattered dresses and bleeding lips.
Lives -- after them, the good is oft interred with their bones. So let it be with the Clintons.
Lives -- after them, the good is oft interred with their bones. So let it be with the Clintons.
If you asked one
hundred people what they think about when they hear the name Bill Clinton, a
goodly number will say womanizer, cheater – a few will use the dreadful word
rapist. And that number will increase. Time and neurology are working against
the Clintons.
Most memory training programs are simply a matter of learning how to associate memories with emotionally charged ideas. This is because the brain is designed to remember where the dangers and the goodies lie and to forget the dry statistics. The brain is more inclined to remember Jennifer Flowers than the unemployment rate in 1996. This effect has tainted the collective memory of many presidents, for example, disclosures about the mistresses of Franklin Delano Roosevelt and John Kennedy. This effect will increase for Bill Clinton both because of the outrageous nature of his conduct and the way it has and will be reported.
People tend to cut quite a bit of slack for the weaknesses of the flesh because there’s a lot of that going around. But Hillary will gain no benefit from that latitude. Everyone knows she stood by her man, blamed his women, and perhaps was a psychological co-rapist for the sake of her political ambitions. Before the next president is elected, Hillary will not only have an albatross around her neck, she will be covered with names like Wellstone, Broaddrick, Moffet, Ward Gracen, Brown, Dowdy, Jones, Ferguson, Zercher, Willey, and more. A majority of those one hundred people will remember the evil the Clintons did, and their legacy will be lost in the folds of tattered dresses and bleeding lips.
Lives -- after them, the good is oft interred with their bones. So let it be with the Clintons.
Most memory training programs are simply a matter of learning how to associate memories with emotionally charged ideas. This is because the brain is designed to remember where the dangers and the goodies lie and to forget the dry statistics. The brain is more inclined to remember Jennifer Flowers than the unemployment rate in 1996. This effect has tainted the collective memory of many presidents, for example, disclosures about the mistresses of Franklin Delano Roosevelt and John Kennedy. This effect will increase for Bill Clinton both because of the outrageous nature of his conduct and the way it has and will be reported.
People tend to cut quite a bit of slack for the weaknesses of the flesh because there’s a lot of that going around. But Hillary will gain no benefit from that latitude. Everyone knows she stood by her man, blamed his women, and perhaps was a psychological co-rapist for the sake of her political ambitions. Before the next president is elected, Hillary will not only have an albatross around her neck, she will be covered with names like Wellstone, Broaddrick, Moffet, Ward Gracen, Brown, Dowdy, Jones, Ferguson, Zercher, Willey, and more. A majority of those one hundred people will remember the evil the Clintons did, and their legacy will be lost in the folds of tattered dresses and bleeding lips.
Lives -- after them, the good is oft interred with their bones. So let it be with the Clintons.
Hillary Clinton Is not just a sore loser, she is a total loser
As one can readily see, Hillary Clinton has been unable to recover
from having lost the 2016 presidential election -- a self-inflicted wound that
she will never cop to. Or, possibly, an act of divine intervention. She has
come up with well over a dozen reasons for her defeat -- every one but the real
one, i.e. she is a loser -- not just a sore loser, but a total loser. She
is
incredibly incompetent, fundamentally
dishonest, and criminally corrupt, and these
are her good qualities.
In addition, she is bereft of a trace of integrity or character, has absolutely no judgment, and is devoid of people skills ( she’s very easy to dislike and distrust and thereby become a member of her deplorables). The 2016 race was hers to lose, and by failing to listen to advice on where to campaign, she managed to do just that -- lose! Thank God -- a Hillary Clinton presidency would be the last nail in America’s coffin.
incredibly incompetent, fundamentally
dishonest, and criminally corrupt, and these
are her good qualities.
In addition, she is bereft of a trace of integrity or character, has absolutely no judgment, and is devoid of people skills ( she’s very easy to dislike and distrust and thereby become a member of her deplorables). The 2016 race was hers to lose, and by failing to listen to advice on where to campaign, she managed to do just that -- lose! Thank God -- a Hillary Clinton presidency would be the last nail in America’s coffin.
We could go through the litany of Hillary Clinton’s failures –
Cattlegate, Whitewater, Travelgate, Filegate, her clumsy and opaque handling of
the health care assignment her husband handed her, her tour of duty in the U.S.
Senate, or her stint at the State Department, starting with her failure to get
the Russian word for “reset” correct and ending with her dereliction of duty in
the case of Benghazi (which produced four dead Americans, including her
“friend” Ambassador Christopher Stevens), which, on testifying before Congress,
she fobbed off with “what difference, at this point, does it make?”
But, for present purposes, I would just like to focus on the
liberties that she has always taken with the truth. When Bill Safire of the New
York Times called
her a congenital liar, he flattered her. You
see, the Clintons don’t just tell lies, they live them.
Consider her most recent whopper -- the one in which she observed,
on being asked what was her most difficult decision, that it was remaining in
her marriage. Why was this her biggest whopper? Because she had no choice but
to remain in her marriage, if, indeed, the arrangement that the Clintons have
qualifies as a “marriage,” rather than a political partnership looking to
advance the ambitions of each of the partners.
Some have applauded her incredible loyalty to Bill in view of his
tawdry behavior. However, if all they had was an “arrangement” to advance their
ambitions, his infidelities were irrelevant as far as hurt feelings were
concerned.
But they were necessary to make her both the object of sympathy
(although one has to wonder why you are deserving of pity on your husband’s
1000th marital transgression). Also, every time he got caught, so it goes,
he owed her one. Ergo, the health care assignment, her Senate term, and,
finally, her stint as Secretary of State. In each of these situations
she distinguished herself more for her failures than any accomplishment.
The point here is that Hillary had no choice but to stay in her
marriage. Without her connection to Bill Clinton, Hillary could not be
nominated for, let alone be elected to, dog catcher of even the smallest of
communities. Her successes in securing all of these positions was
achieved by attaching herself to Bill’s coattails and riding them to each one
of these positions.
So why did Hillary lose the 2016 Presidential election? Because
she’s Hillary Clinton, a born loser. And, more to the point, Hillary Clinton
belongs in the Big House, not in the White House.
BILL CLINTON: SERIAL RAPIST and his enabler, Hillary!
MONICA’S VIDEO ON SERIAL RAPIST BILL CLINTON, HUSBAND OF
SWAMP EMPRESS HILLARY CLINTON, CHARITY FOUNDATION FRAUDSTER
Harvey Weinstein has been exposed in the
media as the sexual predator he is, and Hillary
Clinton has been exposed as the craven money-grubber she is; money over
morality is the mantra she lives by. PATRICIA Mc CARTHY – AMERICAN THINKERcom
Monica Lewinsky says Bill Clinton hinted she should perjure
herself, arranged a farewell Christmas tryst before dumping her
Why is no
one helping or caring about all these women? Who Hillary Viciously went after. The
hypocrisy right now on the left is utterly stunning me. Bill Clinton-12 women
on record telling their stories of him sexually assaulting them starting back
in college! Imagine all the women who still have never told their stories about
him?
Eileen Wellstone (1969)
Allegation: S-exual assault
Anonymous female student at Yale University (1972)
Anonymous female student at the University of Arkansas (1974)
Anonymous female lawyer (1977)
Juanita Broaddrick (1978)
R-ape
Carolyn Moffet (1979)
Elizabeth Ward (1983)
Sally Perdue (1983)
Paula Jones (1991)
Sandra Allen James (1991)
Christy Zercher (1992)
Kathleen Willey (1993)
Monica Lewinsky. 22-year-old intern working for the President
Ronan
Farrow: Bill Clinton ‘Credibly’ Accused of Rape, Investigation Is ‘Overdue’
https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2019/11/03/ronan-farrow-bill-clinton-credibly-accused-of-rape-investigation-is-overdue/
3 Nov 20192,510
2:29
Pulitzer
Prize-winning journalist Ronan Farrow said on HBO’s Real Time With Bill Maher, that
“credible” accusations of rape had been
made against former President Bill Clinton by Juanita Broaddrick, adding that
an investigation into the allegations is now “overdue.”
Maher asked Farrow, who is
best known for helping uncover the Harvey Weinstein sexual assault scandal,
whether Clinton could have survived in today’s political climate of
hyper-awareness about sexual misconduct.
“I think that it is very important
to interject that Bill Clinton is a different conversation,” responded Farrow.
“He has been credibly accused of rape. That has nothing to do with gray areas.
I think that the Juanita Broaddrick claim has been overdue for revisiting.”
Broaddrick, a former nursing
administrator, first made the allegations against Clinton in 1999, claiming
that he raped her in her hotel room in Little Rock in 1978, when he was
Arkansas attorney general and running for governor. Clinton has denied the
allegation through his attorney.
Farrow recently accused Hillary
Clinton in his best-selling book Catch
and Kill of pressuring him during his investigations into
Harvey Weinstein’s behavior. According to Farrow, Clinton’s publicist Nick
Merrill described the story as “a concern” for her reputation.
Meanwhile,
Maher also pressed Farrow on longtime rumors that he is the son of singer
Frank Sinatra, with his mother Mia Farrow having been romantically involved
with the singer and the pair bearing a strong physical resemblance.
“Now, what do you think your father
would think about what you’re doing now?” Maher asked Farrow, in reference to
his investigative reporting.
“I knew I was walking into that so I
asked,” Farrow said. “I didn’t want to give you the sound-bite of ‘Which one?’”
In
2013, Mia Farrow said in an interview with Vanity Fair that Sinatra could
“possibly” be her son’s biological father.
“I feel like there’s no one more
#MeToo-y than Frank Sinatra,” Maher said, asking. “You do own a mirror, don’t
you?”
Farrow eventually admitted that he
“doesn’t know” what Sinatra would have thought of his journalism, but joked
that Maher could “ask my mom” for answers.
Where were the HOWLERS
when serial rapist Bill Clinton, Bill Cosby and Harvey Weinstein were on the
prowl?
http://hillaryclinton-whitecollarcriminal.blogspot.com/2016/07/30-lies-of-hillary-clinton-and-thats.html
Harvey Weinstein has been exposed in the
media as the sexual predator he is, and Hillary
Clinton has been exposed as the craven money-grubber she is; money over
morality is the mantra she lives by. PATRICIA Mc CARTHY – AMERICAN THINKERcom
"But
what the Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of
the American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power,
use it to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and
venal. Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear
to every person on the planet by now."
---- Patricia McCarthy -
AMERICANTHINKER.com
Leaked Julian Assange
Message:
Hillary Is A ‘Well Connected,
Sadistic Sociopath’
"But what the
Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of the
American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power, use it
to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and venal.
Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear to
every person on the planet by now."
---- Patricia McCarthy -
AMERICANTHINKER.com
Hillary, Billary,
Cosby, Buttman Affleck, Oliver Stone, Harvey Weinstein and their boy Obomb…..
new definitions of
degradation and
sleaze.
Harvey Weinstein has been exposed in the
media as the sexual predator he is, and Hillary
Clinton has been exposed as the craven money-grubber she is; money over
morality is the mantra she lives by. PATRICIA Mc CARTHY – AMERICAN THINKERcom
"But
what the Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of
the American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power,
use it to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and
venal. Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear
to every person on the planet by now."
---- Patricia McCarthy -
AMERICANTHINKER.com
DO
YOU GET SICK AND TIRED OF HOLLYWOOD’S STAGGERING HYPOCRISY???
RICH LIBERALS AND
THEIR CELEBRATES P IMPS AND PERVS
…. The parasitism
of Hillary, Billary, Obomb, Heffner, Cosby, Buttman
Affleck, Oliver Stone, Weinstein and the rest.
Harvey Weinstein has been exposed in the
media as the sexual predator he is, and Hillary Clinton has been exposed as the craven money-grubber she is; money over morality is the mantra she lives
by. PATRICIA Mc CARTHY – AMERICAN
THINKERcom
Former
President Bill Clinton speaks during a plenary session at a Clinton Global
Initiative meeting in Marrakech, Morocco, on May 6, 2015. (Abdeljalil
Bounhar/AP Photo)
Bill Clinton Accusers Speak
Out After Ronan Farrow Says Ex-President Was ‘Credibly Accused of Rape’
Juanita Broaddrick, who has long accused
former President Bill Clinton of sexual assault, said that she
agrees with comments made by reporter Ronan Farrow.
Farrow wrote
the book “Catch and Kill: Lies, Spies and a Conspiracy to Protect Predators,”
touching on NBC News’ attempts to silence his reporting about Harvey Weinstein.
He told “Real Time with Bill Maher” that Broaddrick had credibly
accused Clinton of rape.
“Bill Clinton is a different conversation.
He has been credibly accused of rape … That is, I think the Juanita Broaddrick
claim has been overdue for revisiting,” he said on Nov. 1.
He was
answering a question from Maher, who asked a panel, “Could Bill Clinton,
if he had done what he did in 1998 survived today? Or would his own party have
thrown him under the bus?”
According to the Daily Caller, three women who have accused Clinton of assault,
including Broaddrick, said they are hoping for justice.
Clinton has
denied all of the allegations.
“I always have
thought that this should be revisited. … I would like for something to be done
in order to expose this man for all of the things that he has done and possibly
get all of his past presidential perks taken from him,” Broaddrick told the
website. “That would be my biggest goal, because I don’t think anything else can
be done after 40 years.”
Broaddrick
said that the allegations of assault never amounted to anything because of the
power he wielded.
“I think it’s
because of who it was,” she said. “[Lauer and others] are all lower characters.
Who should have been exposed was the president of the United States.”
She accused
him of rape when he was campaigning for governor of Arkansas in 1978.
Leslie
Millwee, another Clinton accuser, told the Daily Caller that she was pleased to
hear Farrow’s interest in the allegations.
“I absolutely
agree that it’s long overdue. … I think that more things are going to come to
light,” Millwee said. “I’m really excited that Ronan’s looking into it. I was
sexually assaulted three times by Bill Clinton … and I would not only like for
Juanita to get justice, you know, I’d like to get justice. I’m elated that he’s
looking into this.”
“I don’t care
what your political affiliation is—whether you lean left or right—sexual
assault is bad and wrong and it should be looked at in that way, and nothing to
do with political affiliation,” said Millwee, a former Arkansas reporter.
And Kathleen
Willey, a former aide in the White House, said that she doesn’t believe
Farrow’s interest in the topic will actually lead to charges against Clinton.
“The world
knows that the Clintons have everybody in their back pocket, and I just don’t
know who’s willing to come forward and take something like that on,” she told
the news outlet. “I certainly agree with what Ronan Farrow said. … What
does ‘revisit’ mean? Is the [district attorney] going to look into this? Is the
special counsel?” Willey said. “It’s been 40 years, and I can’t see anybody
picking the ball up and running with it.”
Willey claimed
that Clinton assaulted her in 1993 in the Oval Office while she volunteered as
an aide, according to Business Insider. Clinton denied the allegations.
Millwee alleged that the former president
sexually assaulted her in 1980 several times at the television station where
she worked. She came forward with the allegations in 2016, speaking to Breitbart.
Clinton
eventually was impeached in 1998 by the House of Representatives for lying
under oath and obstruction of justice following the publication of his
relationship with Monica Lewinsky.
The Senate
ultimately acquitted him in 1999 and he served out his second term until
January 2001.
O.K., Prince Andrew's out
of public life. Why isn't Bill Clinton?
The press is making a big deal out of Britain's Prince Andrew now
being ousted from public life, based on his pretty gamy associations with
pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. He had his hand draped around the bare midriff of a
17-year old, in one photo. He kibbitzed with Epstein after his Florida
slap-on-the-wrist conviction and there's a photograph there, too. Flight
records show he rode the Lolita Express. And incredibly, he claims he
never knew anything untoward was going on.
U.K.'s Daily Mail has this comprehensive report, reasonably
explored from a U.K. perspective. But the U.S. press has been all over it,
too. Here's CNN, Washington Post, Vanity Fair, CNBC, Time, Fox News...
It's good clean fun for the American press, given that the British
royal family is unimportant here, and relies on a pristine public image to
maintain U.K. public support which is pretty incompatible with jetting around
with Epstein, but it also raises questions about why that other famous friend
of Epstein's, Bill Clinton, who rode the Lolita Express again, and again, and
again, isn't getting the same pariah treatment. Fact is, the press hasn't
brought the disgusting thing up at all, even as Clinton's wife (and daughter)
gallivant around the country on a thinly disguised campaign for Hillary as
president.
Joe Biden's gotten all kinds of questions based on his son
Hunter's gamy business dealings. But Hillary Clinton remains immune -- and
not a word has been said in the media about hubby Bill, who's still carrying on
his public life as usual. It's as if he's out of the picture, and all those
denials he's thus far made are simply factual ... albeit about as factual
as Prince Andrew's denials.
And there's more than a few indicators that Clinton wasn't
naive at all about Epstein. Though he wasn't accused by Epstein's credible
accuser Virginia Giuffre, Clinton's been accused repeatedly being a sexual
predator by others earlier. Someone like Clinton turning up with Epstein, is pretty
obviously a matter of public interest, particularly with his wife's presidential
ambitions. Just recently, one of Clinton's accusers, Juanita Broaddrick,
gave this interview to Australia's Sky News, bringing up the constant
issues with the much-vaunted Democratic ex-president, and still seeking
justice. She's not getting any so far:
My
interview with Sky News Australia this evening
MeToo
movement "never wanted anything to do with the victims of Bill Clinton” |
Sky News Australia https://www.skynews.com.au/details/_6108127574001 …
MeToo movement "never wanted anything to do with the
victims of Bill Clinton” | Sky News Australia
Which brings up again why Clinton isn't getting any attention, let
alone ostracization, on his well-known relationship with Epstein. Why not? The
Brit press is interested in British angles, the American press should be
similarly interested in American angles. But only Prince Andrew gets the full
press attention. Maybe that's because he's not a Democrat to protect?
It just shows the press's credibility problem in conveniently
attempting to protect another Democrat from any uncomfortable questions.
Is someone gonna ask the
Clintons about all those trips to Epstein's 'cowboy village'?
The press is piling on against the U.K.'s
Prince Andrew, who's been probably credibly accused of participating in
"suicide" pervert Jeffrey Epstein's sex-with-little-girls operations.
Yes, it's wretched and
appalling. It's bad for a royal family that for decades has
portrayed itself as the embodiment of middle-class values. This
is Shaka Zulu or Genghis Khan territory.
But it's also of limited interest, given
that Prince Andrew is not even important in the royal succession lineup, and
frankly, who cares what some rich overseas princeling is up
to? The media sure didn't, up until now.
There's likely a reason for it — to
deflect attention from the growing evidence that Bill, Hillary, and
even Chelsea Clinton have had a pretty spectacularly intense association
with the very same pervert.
The Daily Mail has been on the job and has
found another credible witness, a former contractor of Epstein's at his
New Mexico "cowboy village" ranch who says the Clintons jetted in
annually on Epstein's Lolita Express and had a grand old time on Epstein's
many-camera'ed grounds. Some opening points from the Mail:
- Bill and Hillary
Clinton would stay at Jeffrey Epstein's New Mexico ranch frequently after
they left the White House, former estate workers told DailyMailTV
- The former president
was Epstein's closest 'celebrity mate' and the Clintons visited Zorro
Ranch 'a whole bunch of times', a former contractor who ran the IT system
at the property said
- The family never
stayed in the main house but bunked down in a special cowboy-themed
village created by Epstein, which lies a mile south of his own villa,
sources said
- The guest homes are
next to other traditional Wild West-style buildings such as an old
schoolhouse and saloon bar, which are all near Epstein's private airstrip,
where he arrived on his private planes
And to read the details of the report is
enough to give the gross-outs to anyone. Why were the Clintons going
to a place Epstein called his "baby-making ranch"? What
was that about Epstein having an eight-person "party
shower"? Did the Clintons do the "party
shower"? Was it on film? How many times? And
who else was in the pen with them? What about that party
room with the stripper poles? Did the Clintons go there,
too? What was the Secret Service thinking, or did Bill bug out again
on his Secret Service? And why are taxpayers paying for this farce?
Why again did Epstein have that icky
portrait of Bill Clinton wearing a blue dress on his Manhattan mansion wall?
'My contact
was Brice, their main concern was that there was no video surveillance on the
property at all. I thought this was a simple request, as they wanted
surveillance to protect their investment. It's a huge site.
'But what was
weird was that the whole time I was on site, Brice would be bragging about how
the Clintons would visit, the whole family. Not just Bill, but Bill, his wife,
their kid, and they would stay on the ranch itself.
More ickiness about Epstein's obsession
with cameras:
Instead of
using an expensive, robust camera system, which used underground cables, he
wanted a 'point-to-point wireless fluid mesh design', which means cameras are
operating via antenna, and is considerably cheaper.
After Kellogg
did an estimate and sent in a plan, he never heard back.
He said:
'They had this huge facility, but it felt like they didn't have the money to do
anything. They were trying to find the most cost-effective way to transmit
video footage and we had to come up with a point-to-point wireless fluid mesh
design because normally we want to trench everything. It saves money as you
don't have to build a trench and put in a cable.
Sound like someone who's been
blackmailed? You decide.
Now, arguably, one could argue that the
press is saying nothing about this, given that the contractor was a different
kind of witness from Virginia Giuffre, the credible young woman who says
Epstein trafficked her with Prince Andrew when she was a teenager.
But the Mail slips in something that
hasn't appeared significantly in the press at all: that Giuffre also says she
saw Bill Clinton at Epstein's pervert haunts being honored by the pedophile
himself.
Why aren't the media covering
that? Now we have the Clintons pinned at two places — the
"cowboy ranch" and the Caribbean pervert island — and no one's saying
anything. It's all about Prince Andrew.
Yet Eptein was obsessed with cameras and
obviously blackmail. He roped in Prince Andrew. But the
real question is to what extent he got the Clintons. With all these
new revelations rolling out, why is the press silent?
Image
credit: Photo montage by Monica Showalter from public domain sources.
Convicted sex offender and Mueller witness
George Nader indicted for illegal contributions to boost Hillary Clinton
Convicted sex offender George Nader, who was a key witness in
special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation, has been indicted by
United States prosecutors for his alleged role in a scheme to conceal large
sums of illegal campaign contributions to help Hillary Clinton in the 2016
election.
Nader, a 60-year-old Lebanese American lobbyist, is accused of
conspiring with Ahmad “Andy” Khawaja, the Los Angeles-based 48-year-old chief
executive of Allied Wallet, to conceal the source of more than $3.5 million in
campaign contributions to political committees associated with a presidential
candidate to gain influence during and after the 2016 campaign.
Nader and Khawaja were charged on Nov. 7 as part of a 53-count
indictment dealt by a federal grand jury in the District of Columbia. The
indictment was unsealed on Tuesday.
Khawaja gave more than $4 million to Clinton's campaign and
other Democrats during the 2016 cycle but later donated $1 million to President
Trump's inaugural committee after Clinton lost, according to the Associated Press. As he shifted his focus to Republicans after the 2016
election, the Lebanese-born Khawaja met with Trump at a Manhattan fundraiser
and got a photo with the president in the Oval Office.
The Justice Department announced on Tuesday that Khawaja
allegedly conspired with Nader to make $3.5 million in straw donations to boost
a presidential candidate from March 2016 through January 2017.
No candidate is mentioned by name, but the indictment and
campaign finance records make it clear that the money was directed towards
helping Clinton during the 2016 campaign.
"By design, these contributions appeared to be in the names
of Khawaja, his wife, and his company. In reality, they allegedly were funded
by Nader," Assistant Attorney General Brian Benczkowski of the Justice
Department’s Criminal Division and FBI Washington Field Office chief Timothy
Slater announced in a statement.
"Khawaja and Nader allegedly made these contributions in an
effort to gain influence with high-level political figures, including the
candidate. As Khawaja and Nader arranged these payments, Nader allegedly
reported to an official from a foreign government about his efforts to gain
influence," they continued.
According to the indictment, after the election Khawaja used his company to steer $1
million to Trump's inaugural committee and attended Trump's inauguration with
Nader.
The other charges in the indictment allege Khawaja and six
associates — Roy Boulos, Rudy Dekermenjian, Mohammad “Moe” Diab, Rani El-Saadi,
Stevan Hill, and Thayne Whipple — conspired to conceal executive contributions,
totaling more than $1.8 million, to various political committees in 2016
through 2018. "Among other things, these contributions allegedly allowed
Khawaja to host a private fundraiser for a presidential candidate in 2016 and a
private fundraising dinner for an elected official in 2018," Benczkowski
and Slater said.
Khawaja is also charged with obstructing the grand jury investigation
in the summer by providing a witness called to testify in the case with false
information about Nader and his connection to Khawaja’s company, while four of
his associates are charged with obstruction by lying to the FBI.
Nader is already in federal custody on other charges. In July,
he was charged with
sex trafficking for allegedly transporting a 14-year-old boy from Europe and
then abusing him. Nader pleaded not guilty in federal court in Alexandria,
Virginia.
Part of a rap sheet dating to the 1980s, Nader pleaded guilty in
1991 to a federal child porn charge involving footage of 13- or 14-year-old
boys and received a six-month sentence, served at a Baltimore halfway house.
Nader acted as a connection between Trump’s circle and Russian,
United Arab Emirates, and Saudi Arabian officials in 2016 and 2017 as he
pursued business deals in the Middle East. This included helping to set up a
January 2017 meeting in the Seychelles between Trump associate and Blackwater
founder Erik Prince and a Russian official with close ties to Russian President
Vladimir Putin.
As reported by the Washington Examiner, records indicate Nader visited the White House at least 13
times to meet with Trump’s then-chief strategist Steve Bannon.
Nader was interviewed by Mueller's team on multiple occasions
regarding possible UAE efforts to influence members of Trump's campaign, and was mentioned in
Mueller's final report more than 100 times.
An attorney for Nader declined
to comment to the Washington
Post, and an attorney for Khawaja could not immediately be reached by the
outlet.
Federal Election Commission records detail the
millions of dollars Khawaja admitted donating to Democratic candidates, campaigns,
and political action committees.
Khawaja told the Federal Election Commission he donated $2,700
in October 2015 and $2,700 in July 2016 to Clinton’s 2016 presidential
campaign, Hillary for America. He said he donated $135,000 in March 2016,
$150,000 in April 2016, $68,400 in June 2016, and $60,000 in September 2016 to
the Clinton campaign’s joint fundraising committee, the Hillary Victory Fund.
The records also show a donation totaling $200,400 in July 2016 to the Hillary
Action Fund, a joint fundraising effort between Clinton’s campaign and the
Democratic National Committee.
Khawaja told the FEC about donations to the DNC totaling
$231,100, in addition to donations to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign
Committee totaling $33,400 in 2016 and $43,900 in 2017 and the Democratic
Congressional Campaign Committee totaling $233,400 in 2016, $230,000 in 2017,
and $237,300 in 2018.
Khawaja also reported donating massive sums to liberal PACs,
including $1,100,000 to Priorities USA Action, the primary super PAC supporting
Clinton's campaign, and $100,000 to Senate Majority PAC in 2016. He also
donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to Senate and congressional races
around the country with a special focus on his home state of California,
including $4,200 in 2016 and $3,900 in 2017 to Schiff for Congress, the
campaign committee for House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff.
In addition, Khawaja’s company, Allied Wallet, reported giving
$550,000 to the Philadelphia 2016 Host Committee, the Democratic National
Convention’s fundraising arm, in July 2016. The business also donated hundreds
of thousands of dollars to Democratic super PACs in 2017 and 2018.
FEC records show Nader reported giving $595 in donations to
Trump’s presidential campaign committee in 2016, as well as $100 dollars to Ben
Carson's campaign, but not to any Democrats that election cycle.
Nader was a business associate of Elliott Broidy, a top Republican fundraiser and deputy
finance chairman of the Republican National Committee who resigned from
that position in April 2018 after reports that Trump lawyer Michael Cohen
negotiated a $1.6 million settlement in 2017 between Broidy and a former
Playboy model who said Broidy impregnated her. Nader and Broidy worked to influence U.S.
foreign policy in the Middle East prior to Broidy's resignation and Nader's
arrest in June.
Is that you, Bill Clinton?
New book says Epstein blackmailed politicians
Jeffrey Epstein was a bizarre
creep. Not only was he a pedophile, but he seemed to be drawn to
pulling in famous people to his pedophilery, in the interests of blackmail.
A new book lays out how strange it was,
stating that Epstein got his entire spy operation from the media empire of the
late Robert Maxwell, a sleazy tabloid-media character who was Epstein
girlfriend Ghislane Maxwell's father, and who died under mysterious
circumstances himself on his yacht, years ago. Apparently, he was
useful to the Mossad for blackmailing politicians, so they all had some kind of
relationship, and Epstein, a pedophile, was brought in. Here's an
interesting review with excerpts from Medium:
According to
the former spy, the ultimate order to embrace Epstein and involve him in the
ongoing arms deals came from "the bosses" at Israeli intelligence
headquarters.
"They
were agents of the Israeli Intelligence Services," he told James
Robertson.
"Later
on [Ghislaine] got involved with Israeli intelligence together with him. But
not in this arms deal with Iran business," Ben-Menashe also told Zev Shalev,
former CBS News executive producer and investigative journalist for the
website Narativ.
"These
guys were seen as agents. They weren't really competent to do very much. And so
they found a niche for themselves — blackmailing American and other political
figures."
He told
Robertson, "Mr. Epstein was the simple idiot who was going around providing
girls to all kinds of politicians in the United States. See, f------ around is
not a crime. It could be embarrassing, but it's not a crime. But f------ a
fourteen-year-old girl is a crime. And he was taking photos of politicians
f------ fourteen-year-old girls — if you want to get it straight. They would
just blackmail people, they would just blackmail people like that."
This, if true, tells us two things: that
Epstein was able to get away from the long arm of the law due to politics, but
he also may have had some nefarious sway over a lot of politicians, what with
his tabloid spy ties via House Maxwell and, apparently, the Israeli spy
apparat, too.
So imagine a guy like Bubba Clinton
strolling into this and indulging his enormous appetites, and not a clue as to
the forces circling him.
If even a scintilla of this is what was
going on, there may be forces out there with the wherewithal to rub out Epstein
in his prison, as well as hold enormous sway over many gullible and immoral
Western politicians.
It once again raises questions as to where
Bill Clinton was in all this. He's intersected the Epstein world all
too often for something of this nature not to ensnare. And with a
compliant media establishment, he's still getting away with saying nothing was
going on.
Image credit:
Photo illustration by Monica Showalter from public domain sources.
Joe
Biden? Seriously?
“He’s a
totally corrupt swamp thing, and here’s the worst part of his manifest
corruption – he doesn’t seem to realize that he’s corrupt, if not personally
than in terms of allowing his bum kid to leverage his position. He thinks it’s A-OK for his boy Hoover to cash in
all over the globe. After all, that’s what you do, right? That’s part of the
benefits package for being in the liberal elite. And all these people fussing
and fighting about the paternity test-failing dirtbag getting rich are totally
out of line. How dare they? HOW DARE THEY!”
He
wants to raise taxes, open the borders, let you pay for illegal aliens’ sex
changes, and spark a civil war by taking guns from the people who don’t commit
crimes.
Joe
Biden? Seriously?
The
establishment narrative on Joe Biden is, to put it mildly, malarkey. Gropey J
actually is everything the liberals accuse Donald Trump of being – bizarre,
vulgar, dumb, corrupt, incompetent, and utterly unfit to be president. But yet
the Creepy Veepy is so much more. In the last month, this totally not-senile,
not-at-all-weird guy has assembled a track record of freaky behavior that would
put mid-eighties Crispin
Glover to
shame.
Let’s
review…
Corn Pop
is old news. Biden’s latest rambling onion-on-the-belt monologue was something about
little kids at a pool rubbing his leg hair or something – it’s so random I’m
not even linking to it. There’s no best-case scenario here – he’s just creepy.
Then, for
no other reason than I guess he felt like a snack, he started gnawing on his
wife’s fingers in public and on camera. You know, like people do. You wonder
what the thought process there was…
“Hey,
sure are lots of cameras…gosh, I’m kind of hungry…oh look, an index finger.
Yum.”
I’m a
little surprised he didn’t pull out a packet of ketchup.
But the
best part was when some guy pointed out that, you know, Biden’s loser son Lil’
Crackpipe is the poster child for corruption and Sane Joe started spazzing out
and calling him “fat” and challenging him to a push-up contest for some reason.
This is
just odd. And this is the candidate who, amazingly, is still in the lead for
the Democrat nomination.
And then
there’s the groping females thing. He still does it occasionally, though the
media does its best to curtail coverage of his lecherous creeping. Do you
believe there’s any chance at all that he is not going to, at some point, have
some horrifying incident with some female at the White House, you know, like
grabbing the Queen for a hug n’ rub, or walking absent-mindedly into the press room
in a flapping robe with Little Joe and the gang in effect?
And let’s
be charitable. No one has ever called Joe Biden “smart.” Well, maybe as a joke.
The fact is that he’s a 40-watt guy in a 100-watt world. Haters say Trump is
dumb, but he is demonstrably not dumb. The thing about Trump is that because
our garbage elite hates him it tends to ascribe all possible negative
characteristics to him regardless of whether they apply. Trump is cunning,
crafty and has a keen sense of strategy. You may dislike him, but that does not
change the fact that alone, against the full force of the elite and its media
serfs, he prevailed and continues to prevail. If Trump, who managed to figure
out that it would be a good idea to campaign in Wisconsin, is dumb, what does that
make Felonia Milhous von Pantsuit and the sobbing losers who supported her?
No one
can seriously argue that Joe Biden is smart, and no one does. They’ll either
call you “racist” or start complaining about Trump. But you won’t get anyone
comparing the former veep to Stephen Hawking. They just sort of elide past his
staggering stupidity, perhaps hoping that whoever he picks for his veep will
give him a rubber ball to play with and lock him in an Oval Office closet when
it's time to do some presidenting.
He’s a
totally corrupt swamp thing, and here’s the worst part of his manifest
corruption – he doesn’t seem to realize that he’s corrupt, if not personally
than in terms of allowing his bum kid to leverage his position. He thinks it’s A-OK for his boy Hoover to cash in
all over the globe. After all, that’s what you do, right? That’s part of the
benefits package for being in the liberal elite. And all these people fussing
and fighting about the paternity test-failing dirtbag getting rich are totally
out of line. How dare they? HOW DARE THEY!
Understand
that Biden sees nothing wrong with this. Nothing. And that means there will be
exponentially more of it. Hell, the useless DoJ under Trump won’t prosecute
obvious graft. Do you think a DoJ that’s thrilled to have a fellow traveler
back in the White House is going to root out Biden's business badness? You do?
Well, then meet my unicorn Chet.
And
SloJoe is utterly incompetent. This is the guy who thought they should let bin
Laden skate. As Robert Gates, no Trumpie, said, "I think he has been wrong
on nearly every major foreign policy and national security issue over the past
four decades.”
This is
the guy who wants to take your doctor, again, and impose another brilliant
healthcare reform idea, again – all designed to unscrew the last big healthcare
reform the Democrats passed, which he praised as “a big [vulgarity] deal.”
He wants
to obey that tiresome Swedish teenager’s commands to sacrifice at the altar of
the weird weather cult. He wants to appoint all Hawaiian and Scat Franciscan
judges.
He
wants to raise taxes, open the borders, let you pay for illegal aliens’ sex
changes, and spark a civil war by taking guns from the people who don’t commit
crimes.
When you
think of a calm, steady, wise presence guiding the nation, you do not think of
Joe Biden, though that’s what is allegedly needed to end the nightmare of the
Trump presidency – you know, the record job numbers and the lack of stupid new
wars. You think of Obama and Stumbles McMyturn, only dumber and touchier.
Just
recently, Biden’s campaign ran an ad alleging that foreigners were “laughing”
at Donald Trump. Is there any Democrat anywhere who takes America’s side in a
dispute with malicious aliens? In any case, those tin pot euroweenies had
plenty to cry about – Donald Trump has forced them to pay up for NATO. Of
course, that will end too if Joe takes office. We’ll return to business as
usual – the business as usual of being shafted for the benefit of the global
bigshots.
Basically,
we’ll get rid of all the peace and prosperity that Trump has brought and get
back to normal – that is, people like us being plundered by the garbage elite.
Trump has
a track record of success, and Democrats hate him. Joe has a track record of failure,
corruption, and creepiness. Well, I guess we know why the Democrats seem to love him.
It’s out
now, my new novel Collapse, the action-packed yet hilarious
sequel to People's Republic, Indian Country and Wildfire. Friendless loser Never Trumpers
hate it, so you’ll love it.
***One last thing. On
Wednesdays, there's BONUS KURT if you're a Townhall VIP member. Sign up today.
Three Kurts is better than two.
No comments:
Post a Comment