THE DOCTRINE OF THE N.A.F.T.A. GLOBALIST DEMOCRATS IS TO SERVE THE BILLIONAIRE CLASS WITH ENDLESS WAVES OF INVADING 'CHEAP' LABOR SUBSIDIZED WITH WELFARE FUNDED BY TAXES ON MIDDLE AMERICA.
In many speeches, Mayorkas says he is building a mass migration system to deliver workers to wealthy employers and investors and “equity” to poor foreigners. The nation’s border laws are subordinate to elites’ opinion about “the values of our country,” Mayorkas claims.
Thursday, January 2, 2020
CALIFORNIA TO LOSE CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT AS AMERICANS (LEGALS) FLEE THE HIGH TAX MEXICAN WELFARE STATE
Guillermo Arias / AFP / Getty Images
California could lose a congressional district following 2020 census count
California is poised to lose a congressional seat for the first time in its history as a state.
California is poised to lose a congressional seat for the first time in its history as a state, based on U.S. Census Bureau population estimates released Monday that showed the nation’s growth continued to slow in 2019.
Some 27 states and the District of Columbia lost residents through net domestic migration between 2018 and 2019, the new census data show.
About 203,000 people left California in that period, a result of the state’s shifting migration patterns and economic strains that are making it harder to afford living here. New York, Illinois, New Jersey, Massachusetts and Louisiana also saw large losses to other states.
California’s potential loss in reapportionment, which will be determined by next year’s census count, would drop the state’s number of seats in the U.S. House of Representatives from 53 to 52, said William Frey, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution.
“It’s got a lot to do with dispersion from California to the rest of the west,” Frey said. “Arizona, Texas and Colorado are all big destinations for California migrants, and they all are gaining seats.”
A 2019 relocation study by Texas Realtors found that 63,175 Californians moved to Texas in 2017, while California was the top destination for Texans to move — nearly 41,000 relocated here.
Texas is likely to gain three seats following the 2020 decennial count, according to Frey’s analysis of census data, while states such as Arizona, Colorado and Oregon may gain one seat apiece.
The apportionment population count for each of the 50 states includes the state’s total resident population — citizens and non-citizens — as well as a count of the overseas federal employees and their dependents who have that state listed as their home state in their employers’ administrative records, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
The House of Representatives is limited to 435 members, not under the U.S. Constitution, but because of a 1929 federal law that could be changed if lawmakers and the president agreed to do so.
Exactly where California would lose a seat in the House depends on which communities are larger or smaller compared to census numbers from 2010. The state’s Citizens Redistricting Commission, whose members will be selected in coming months, will hold public hearings in 2021 to determine how to redraw congressional maps.
Paul Mitchell, one of the state’s leading analysts of the redistricting process, said that two places could dominate the discussion: the communities sitting at the intersection of Los Angeles, Orange and San Bernardino counties and the suburbs to the east of San Francisco.
But other big changes to the political map-drawing process are also in store — including the 2013 ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court to strike part of the federal Voting Rights Act that strongly influenced the current California maps.
“That will allow a massive rewrite of the Central Valley congressional districts, so it might be really hard to see the total impact” of losing a House seat because of population, Mitchell said.
Even so, the most obvious political impact would be to force incumbent House members to either run against each other or leave office. In 2012, Rep. Brad Sherman (D-Northridge) defeated former Rep. Howard Berman in a bitter contest brought on by the new lines drawn in Los Angeles County.
State census workers, community organizations and local politicians started outreach efforts as early as April to ensure an accurate tally in next year’s count. In addition to reapportionment, nearly $800 billion in federal tax dollars and political redistricting are at stake.
State government leaders have allocated about $187 million to help verify addresses and expand outreach efforts, according to California’s census office.
Still, there will be major hurdles. Those without reliable internet connections may be missed in a census that will rely heavily on online surveys. Los Angeles County, officials say, will be the nation’s hardest to tally because of its high concentrations of renters and homeless people, as well as immigrant communities that may not participate, either because of language barriers or because they fear being targeted by federal immigration authorities.
“If, as many fear, non-citizen populations and the state’s heavily Latino population either fails to participate or participates without providing full household counts, then California could lose more than one seat,” said Mitchell, whose firm analyzes political data for regional and statewide candidates.
Nationally, natural increase (births minus deaths) has declined steadily over the past decade. The U.S. also registered a decline in its population under the age of 18, Frey, the demographer, said. California led in that category, with a drop of about 400,000 people under the age of 18, followed by Illinois and New York. The South and West saw the biggest gain in children, Frey added, led by Texas.
“This is a symptom of an aging population,” he said, “and in states like California, an out-migration of younger families with children.”
California’s representation stayed the same following the 2010 census count. If the state does lose a seat or two in 2020, Frey said, it’s uncertain whether the decline would carry into the 2030 count.
“In a way, these last few years are a confluence of things that may not continue over time,” he said. “The slowdown in immigration may not continue, millennials may finally start having kids. Domestic out-migration may continue. All those things happened at the same time, so I don’t think they’re going to be quite as dim in the next few years.”
ONLY ABOUT ONE IN EIGHT BORDER JUMPERS ARE ACTUALLY CAUGHT.
THE REST GO ON TO LOOT JOB, WELFARE, SOCIAL SERVICES AND THEN VOTE DEMOCRAT FOR
MORE
4.3M
Migrants Caught at SW Border in Decade — More Than Los Angeles Population
Border Patrol agents apprehended
more than four million migrants who illegally crossed the southwest border with
Mexico during the past 10 fiscal years. If these migrants were placed into a
single city, it would be larger than Los Angeles by population.
During the past 10 fiscal years,
October 1, 2009, through September 30, 2019, U.S. Border Patrol agents assigned
to the nine sectors that make up the United States’ southwest border with
Mexico apprehended 4,318,200 migrants. The highest year during that decade for
apprehensions occurred during Fiscal Year 2019 when agents apprehended 851,553
— including 76,020 Unaccompanied Alien Children (UAC) and 473,682 Family Unit
Aliens (FMUA), according to reports obtained from U.S. Customs and Border
Protection.
Apprehensions by Fiscal Year:
FY2019 — 851,553
FY2018 — 396,579
FY2017 — 303,916
FY2016 — 408,870
FY2015 — 331,333
FY2014 — 479,371
FY2013 — 414,397
FY2012 — 356,873
FY2011 — 327,577
FY2010 — 447,731
During the past decade, Rio Grande
Valley (RGV) Sector Border Patrol agents apprehended the largest numbers of
migrants. Between fiscal years 2010 and 2019, RGV Sector agents apprehended
1,600,663 migrants who illegally crossed the border into South Texas, the
reports state.
Agents assigned to the Tucson Sector
had the second-highest number of total apprehensions — 946,948. The Big Bend
Sector in West Texas had the lowest number of total apprehensions — 56,149.
The report shows a shifting in
migration traffic during the past decade. In FY2010, the Tucson Sector reported
the highest number of apprehensions — 212,202. This changed in FY2013 when the
largest apprehension numbers shifted to the RGV Sector.
In Fiscal Year 2019, RGV agents
apprehended 339,135 migrants including 34,523 UACs and 211,631 FMUAs.
During the past 10 fiscal years,
Border Patrol agents apprehended a total of 433,216 unaccompanied minors.
Officials reported that more than half of those apprehensions, 235,050 took
place in the RGV Sector.
FMUA apprehension numbers for the
decade were not readily available. U.S. Customs and Border Protection officials
provided statistics for Fiscal Years 2013 through 2019. During that period,
Border Patrol agents apprehended 857,328 family units. More than half of these,
463,811, occurred in the RGV Sector.
FMUA apprehensions represent the
largest increase in migrant demographics. The number of apprehensions jumped
from 14,855 in FY2013 to 473,682 in FY2019 — an increase of more than 3,000
percent. Again, more than half of the FMUA apprehensions occurred in the RGV
Sector — 463,811.
With three fiscal years missing from
the FMUA report, FMUA and UAC apprehensions account for 1.3 million of the
total 4.3 million apprehensions. These demographics also represent the highest
cost to U.S. taxpayers in terms of processing, transporting, feeding, and
providing healthcare, Border Patrol officials repeatedly state.
The Census Bureau claims that
immigration dropped to just 595,000 people in the 12 months up to mid-2019, but
the estimate is built on conflicting data, said Steven Camarota, a statistician
at the Center for Immigration Studies.
“Net
immigration is a very hard thing to measure because there is so much sampling
variability” amid continued arrivals and departures, he said, adding that
President Donald Trump’s pro-American policies may be prompting illegal
migrants to evade surveys.
The
bureau’s conflicting migrant population estimates are hidden under the bureau’s
claim that the nation’s population rose by just 0.5 percent from
July 2018 to July 2019, up to 328 million. The number is low partly
because the bureau says the resident population of legal and illegal migrants
rose by only 595,000 during the year up to July 2019.
But
the Department of Homeland Security reported that 700,000 migrants crossed the
southeastern border in the nine months before July 2019. The vast majority of
those Central American migrants were allowed to stay pending their eventual
asylum hearings.
Trump
sharply reduced the flow of border migrants in the second half of 2019 and may
have reduced the number of new overstays and new illegals. But Congress and
business have blocked his 2018 efforts to shrink legal immigration.
Business
groups and investors want
the federal government to stimulate their economic growth and stock values
by adding more
immigrant workers and more consumers. Faster
population growth means higher forecasts for economic consumption, sales,
housing prices, and profits, thus boosting the value of stock prices on Wall
Street.
So
business groups are touting the bureau’s new low-ball estimate to demand even
more migration. For example, the New
York Timesportrayed the
bureau’s new claim of slow immigrant growth as bad for investors and the
economy:
William
H. Frey, a noted demographer and senior
fellow at the Brookings Institution, said in an interview Monday
that the percentage increase was the lowest in a century. The growth rate
during the most recent decade, about 6.7 percent, is expected to be the lowest
since the government started taking population counts around 1790, he said.
“This
is a huge downturn in the nation’s growth,” Mr. Frey said. “This is even lower
than the Great Depression.”
Census
watchers say that one of the biggest reasons for the stagnancy of the
population is the decrease in the number of new immigrants. a trend that has
continued through President Trump’s first three years in office.
…
“The
immigration is really the [economic] safety valve for us going forward,” Mr.
Frey said of population growth. “I think that immigration is an important part
of what we have to think about going forward.”
In
contrast, wage-earning Americans gain from a reduced migrant inflow. Any
declines in worker population pressure employers to compete for new employees
by offering higher wages and by training sidelined Americans. The slower
population growth also allows young Americans to migrate to good jobs in other
regions, and to buy homes in good locations at lower costs. Slower population
growth also forces employers to buy labor-saving machines to allow employees to
earn more by getting more work done each day.
Those
changes also mean that slower population growth — via lower births or reduced
immigration — also tends to transfer wealth from older investors back to young
wage-earners. “Throughout American history, even during the Great Depression,
business always says they don’t have enough workers,” said Camarota, adding:
That’s
true today as well – [because] they always want to keep wages down [and] they
have an [economic] interest in an ever-more densely populated America. Whether
that is in the interest of the American people already here that is a different
question.
Almost 50% of U.S. employees got higher wages in 2019, up
from almost 40% in 2018.
That's useful progress - but wage growth will likely rise
faster if Congress stopped inflating the labor supply for the benefit of
business. http://bit.ly/2SyaLg7
However,
the Associated Press pushed the same pro-migration,
pro-growth theme. “Immigration is a wildcard in that
it is something we can do something about,” Frey said. “Immigrants tend to be
younger and have children, and they can make a population younger.”
“Immigration
is no fix for an aging society,” said Camarota. “The immigrants grow old,
and they don’t have that many children.” Currently, “everybody has
got low fertility … and the fertility of young immigrants has declined more
than the fertility of natives,” he said.
Some
of the population data is easy to count accurately. For example, government
agencies and hospitals reported just 3,791,712 births and 2,835,038 deaths
in 2019, so boosting the native-born population by only 956,674.
But
estimates for immigration are far more difficult, said Camarota.
For
example, the two Census Bureau population-tracking estimates lag far
behind the news.
In
November, the bureau released its 2018 American Community Survey that excluded
data from the second half of 2018 and all of 2019. So the 2018 report missed
the inflow of roughly 800,000 migrants across the border in 2019 as it reported
that 1.45 million new legal and illegal immigrants settled in the United
States during 2017.
The
estimated 1.45 million immigrant inflow in 2017 is down from 1.75 million
migrants in 2016 and the 1.62 million migrants in 2015, but it was
also more than any year between 2002 to 2013.
Alongside
the ACS, the bureau also releases the Current Population Survey (CPS). It
“showed a significantly larger total number of [legal and illegal] immigrants
in 2018 (45.8 million) vs. the total shown in the ACS (44.7 million),” said
a November
analysis by Camarota.
“A
recent news story in the New
York Times announced that growth in the immigrant population “Slows to a
Trickle,” said an October report by
CIS, which explained:
An
op-ed in the Times a
few weeks later went even further, mistakenly
interpreting the earlier report as meaning that “immigration fell 70%”
in the last year. The writers interpret this as the result of President Trump’s
immigration policy changes.
But
it is not clear that any slowdown in immigration has actually taken place.
First,
growth in the immigrant population does not measure new arrivals; immigrants
come and go, so the net change in the total is not the same as the annual
number of new arrivals.
More
important, though, is that the two Census Bureau surveys that measure the
foreign-born have recently diverged in unexpected ways. The Times news story correctly
reports the results of one of those data sources, the American Community Survey
(ACS), showing a growth of 200,000 immigrants. But the other data source, the
Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement (CPS ASEC, or
just CPS for short), shows an increase of 1.6 million in the immigrant
population between 2017 and 2018 – quite the opposite of “slowing to a
trickle”.
These
annual differences produce larger differences over several years, said the CIS
report:
In
terms of growth, the ACS shows a 4.8 million increase from 2010 to 2018 in the
immigrant population, while the [2018] CPS shows a 6.9 million increase over
the same period. The just-released 2019 CPS shows an increase of 7.3 million
since 2010 …
From
2015 to 2019, growth in the immigrant population averaged one million in the
CPS, while in the ACS it averaged 600,000 from 2015 to 2018 (Figure 1 and Table
1).
NYT's Tom Edsall says Trump's immigration-reform voters
are 'snakes and vermin.'
Edsall usually tries to understand ordinary Americans'
concerns. But he & his elite peers live in a bubble & just don't see
immigration's huge economic damage to Americans.http://bit.ly/2YQO7Aq
The
swearing-in of new citizens also lags,he Census Bureau reports. The
naturalization data show that a record number of immigrants became citizens —
and possible voters — in 2019:
Earlier this week ICE released its 2019 report on
enforcement activity. While overall removals increased due to a record number
of illegal arrivals at the southwest border, removals from the interior
declined by 10 percent. Meanwhile, ICE's caseload grew by 24 percent, with more
than 630,000 cases added to its docket, which has grown to a record high of
more than three million cases.
THOMAS
HOMAN, the former acting head of
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
warned Democrats running in 2020 about
“enticing” illegal immigrants with lax policies.
"They
say they care about these people, they
care
about children dying and women being
raped...
they need to look in the mirror
because
if you keep offering enticements...
'sanctuary
cities'... free health care... in-state
A six-time deported
illegal alien has been arrested for allegedly killing a 51-year-old Colorado
grandmother after being released from local law enforcement custody.
Juan Sanchez, a Mexican
illegal alien who has already been deported from the United States six times
over the last decade, was arrested last week and charged with vehicular
homicide and fleeing the scene of an accident after he allegedly hit and killed
Annette Conquering Bear, a grandmother, while she was walking home from
Walgreens, 9 Newsreported.
Sanchez, Immigration and Customs
Enforcement (ICE) officials revealed, was deported from the U.S. twice in 2002,
three times in 2008, and in 2012. Sometime after his last deportation, he
illegally re-entered the U.S. for the seventh time.
“Sanchez is an ICE enforcement priority,”
ICE officials said in a statement.
Four days before Conquering Bear’s killing,
Sanchez was in local law enforcement custody on suspicion of drunk driving but
was released after Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials said
they did not have enough time in advance to lodge a detainer against him so he
could be turned over to their custody.
During that arrest, Sanchez was allegedly
driving drunk with a blood-alcohol level of 0.183, which is twice the legal
limit. Police said Sanchez admitted to having had “two beers” before getting in
his car and driving with an “international driver’s license.”
Sanchez was taken into custody at the time
and was then quickly released after he became uncooperative and allegedly
telling officers, “I’ll fight my way out of jail.”
The illegal alien is now being held on a $500,000
bond.
John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart
News. Follow him on Twitter at @JxhnBinder.
Sanctuary City Released Human Rights Violator
And then NYC hit the snooze button on this wake-up call
In my last post, I discussed a Liberian
amnesty provision that was snuck into section 7611
of the National Defense Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2020. I specifically
referenced the case of Liberian human rights violator Charles
Cooper, who
was removed by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to Liberia in
June 2018. I left out the part about how the New York Police Department (NYPD)
failed to honor an ICE detainer for him, and released him without even
notifying the agency. The incident does not reflect well on those who set the
rules for New York's finest.
Cooper entered the United
States in January 2006 on a nonimmigrant visa, and remained beyond his
authorized return date. He was no ordinary visa overstay. According to ICE, Cooper
"served as a bodyguard to former Liberian President Charles Taylor and was
a member of a paramilitary police unit called the Secret Security Service
(SSS)."
ICE continued:
"Cooper, while a member of the SSS and the National Patriotic Front of
Liberia [NPLF], was directly involved in the persecution of civilians in
Liberia." In addition to identifying Cooper as "a human rights
violator," the agency asserted that he was "a member of an
organization known for setting fires to whole villages."
The aforementioned Charles Taylor is a special case.
He was a Liberian civil servant in the 1980s, and was accused of embezzlement.
He made his way to the United States, but escaped from prison in Massachusetts
where he was being held for extradition, and travelled back to West Africa. He
thereafter formed the NPFL, and in 1989 launched attacks against the Liberian
government from the Ivory Coast, igniting Liberia's first civil war.
Global
Security explains
that between December 1989 and the middle of 1993, the NPFL "is estimated
to have been responsible for thousands of deliberate killings of civilians. As
NPFL forces advanced towards Monrovia in 1990, they targeted people of the
Krahn and Mandingo ethnic groups, both of which the NPFL considered supporters
of [then-Liberian President Samuel] Doe's government."
Various factions became
involved in the conflict, including the NPFL; forces that were loyal to Doe;
the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and their Nigerian-led
peacekeeping force, ECOMOG; and the breakaway Independent National Patriotic
Front of Liberia (INPFL), which was led by Prince Johnson. INPFL captured, mutilated,
and killed Doe on September 10, 1990.
The first bloody civil war
ended with Taylor's election as president in 1997. According to Britannica, however:
As
president, Taylor restructured the army, filling it with members of his former
militia. Conflict ensued between Taylor and the opposition, and Monrovia became
the scene of widespread gun battles and looting. Governments around the world
accused Taylor of supporting rebels in Sierra Leone, and in 2000 the United
Nations Security Council imposed sanctions on Liberia. The country was
subsequently gripped again by civil war, and Taylor, accused of gross human
rights violations, was indicted by a UN-sponsored war-crimes tribunal (the
Special Court for Sierra Leone) in 2003.
Following
widespread international condemnation, Taylor agreed to go into exile in Nigeria.
In March 2006, however, the Liberian government requested Taylor's extradition,
and Nigeria announced that it would comply with the order. Taylor subsequently
attempted to flee Nigeria but was quickly captured. Charged with crimes against
humanity and war crimes committed during Sierra Leone's civil war, he was later
sent to The Hague, where he was to be tried before the Special Court for Sierra
Leone.
Taylor was found guilty in
April 2012 on 11 counts "of bearing responsibility for the war crimes and
crimes against humanity committed by rebel forces during Sierra Leone's civil
war", and subsequently sentenced to 50 years in prison.
Back to Cooper. As noted, he entered as
a nonimmigrant with permission to remain until August 2006. When he failed to
depart, he was placed into removal proceedings. He was ordered removed by an
immigration judge and appealed the decision, which was dismissed by the Board
of Immigration Appeals in February 2016.
According to ICE:
On
Aug. 11, 2017, Cooper was arrested by the New York Police Department, and
charged with DWI. On that same date, [ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations
(ERO)] deportation officers lodged an immigration detainer with the NYPD's
Richmond Central Booking. Cooper was released from NYPD custody, without the
detainer being honored and without notification to ICE.
Fortunately, in May 2018,
ICE deportation officers arrested Cooper in Staten Island, New York, leading to
his removal.
As my former
colleague Preston
Huennekens reported:
"In March 2013, New York City began ignoring [ICE] detainer notices."
According to ICE, the agency had "not
been notified about the release of aliens in custody at New York City
facilities since 2014, except for those that fall within the 170 crimes
considered egregious by the Mayor's Office." Apparently, human rights
violators do not make the cut.
Huennekens noted that in just
one three-month period (January to mid-April 2018), the NYPD and the New York
Department of Corrections together ignored 440 detainers; "40 of those
individuals released from custody subsequently committed more crimes and were
arrested again." About this, ICE stated: "In
just three months, more than three dozen criminal aliens were released from
local custody. Simply put, the politics and rhetoric in this city are putting
its own communities at an unnecessary risk."
To restate the obvious:
Sanctuary policies, including those that prevent ICE from finding out about the
release of dangerous aliens and that require police to ignore ICE detainers,
make no sense. They only serve as sanctuary for criminals, or in Cooper's case,
human rights violators.
Cooper should have served
as a wake-up call to those in power who, for purely political reasons, require
the NYPD to turn a blind eye to ICE's requests for help. But instead, as
Huennekens' reporting demonstrates, Gotham's officials simply hit the snooze
button.
“Furthermore, the
much-quoted estimate of 11 million undocumented aliens in the U.S. may be
woefully short of the truth. A new study by Yale University suggests the true
number of illegals is probably in the 20-to-30 million range, more than enough
to kill the two-party system at one stroke, if they eventually receive the
citizenship amnesty promised by Democrats.” JAMES DELMONT…. AMNESTY
WILL ENABLE 40 MILLION ILLEGALS TO BRING UP THE REST OF THEIR FAMILIES. NOW DO
THE MATH ON THE LOOMING JOBS, HOUSING AND SOCIAL SECURITY CRISIS.
California’s de facto
status as a one-party state lies at the heart of its poverty problem. With a permanent majority in the
state senate and the assembly, a prolonged dominance in the executive branch,
and a weak opposition, California Democrats have long been free to indulge
blue-state ideology while paying little or no political price. The state’s
poverty problem is unlikely to improve while policymakers remain unwilling to
unleash the engines of economic prosperity that drove California to its golden
years. Kerry Jackson
Is the government of Mexico behind this?
You have seen quotes from a Mexican President and a Mexican Consul General in
support of it. They have everything to gain and little to lose by pushing it.
The Mexican government is also pushing illegal immigration, which destabilizes
our economy. TOM BARRETT
One in
every eleven
persons born in Mexico has gone to the U.S.
The National Review reported that in
2014 $1.87 billion was spent on incarcerating
illegal immigrant criminals….Now add hundreds of billions for welfare and
remittances! MICHAEL BARGO, Jr
Is Mass Immigration Killing Two-Party Democracy in the U.S.?
Few seem willing to admit
it, but mass immigration appears to be killing democracy in the United States.
Two-party democracy withstood the unprecedented mass immigration of the 1870-to-1914
period because the European immigrants tended, for one reason or another, to
vote for both parties. That is not true today. In the 19th century, newcomers
voted along religious lines to a remarkable degree: Irish Catholics 80 percent
Democrat and all Catholics 70 percent Democrat. But after the Civil War,
Germans and Scandinavians, heavily Lutheran, voted Republican, as English
Canadian and British immigrants did. In the famous turning-point presidential
election of 1896, urban working-class immigrants tended to vote Republican,
organized by the active and powerful political machines in big cities like New
York, Philadelphia, and Chicago. Very few in the mass migration of that day
moved to the American South, which remained solidly Democrat. The two-party
system survived throughout most of the country as both parties had urban
political machines that provided social services to immigrants.
The present massive wave of
immigration that began in the 1970s, largely as a result of the extended family
clause in the 1965 Kennedy immigration reform bill, has had remarkably
different results. The new immigrants are voting overwhelmingly Democrat:
Hispanics 2 to 1, Asians about 70 percent (all election figures from the Pew Research Center). The children of
Asian immigrants voted 82 percent for Barack Obama in 2008. In addition, black
Americans who used to vote Republican now vote 90 percent or more Democrat, as
do black immigrants.
California not long ago was
a state Republicans could win. Two presidents, Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan,
came from California and major offices such as governor were regularly won by
Republicans. Today California is a permanently blue state, with its wealth of
electoral votes. Its U.S. senators, governor, and most of its members of
Congress are Democrats. Democrats have a supermajority in both houses of the
Legislature and have changed the constitution so that party primaries have been
banned in favor of “open” primaries in which Republicans are likely not to
finish higher than third, thus not making the November ballot. In the last two
U.S. Senate races, 2016 and 2018, voters were offered Democrat No. 1 and
Democrat No. 2 as choices. Unsurprisingly, Democrats won both elections, and
one of the winners, Kamala Harris, is
now running for president.
The demographic tidal wave
of mostly Third World immigrants who vote heavily Democrat is now running
legally at a million a year, an all-time record, and is turning red states
purple and then blue. Arizona is going, Colorado and Georgia
are going, Virginia is gone, North Carolina is tipping, and Florida is a dead
heat but the immigration trends (south-of-the-border Latinos and Puerto Ricans)
are against the GOP. Even Texas is drifting leftward as Latinos bid to become a
solid majority there. There is the myth, of course — offered by members of the
Bush family — that Hispanics will see the light and begin voting like Indiana
Republicans. In fact, Hispanics have voted Democrat since 1960, and they
went for Obama in 2008 by 67-31 percent and for Hillary Clinton in 2016 by
66-28 percent. So much for the Bush theory. Asians voted 77 percent for Obama
in 2012 and 79 percent for Clinton in 2016. So much for the two-party system.
Furthermore, the much-quoted
estimate of 11 million undocumented aliens in the U.S. may be woefully short of
the truth. A new study by Yale University suggests the true number of illegals
is probably in the 20-to-30 million range, more than enough to kill the
two-party system at one stroke, if they eventually receive the citizenship
amnesty promised by Democrats.
The two-party system in the
U.S. has been healthy since 1796, when Thomas Jefferson took on John Adams in
the presidential contest. They met again in 1800 in a more famous showdown, by
which time the earliest political parties had formed and taken on ideological
hues that still exist today. The ideal situation for a healthy democracy and a
workable two-party system is a stable population. If the population is stable
(and growing slowly), each party has an opportunity to persuade the public of
its merits. That opportunity is disappearing quickly because the population is
not stable. We are not far from the time when the U.S. will have a Latino
majority and will, regrettably, be a one-party state. Apparently, that is what
Democrats want.
James Delmont, author of The
Great Liberal Death Wish, has been
published in Financial Times, USA Today, the Baltimore Sun,
the Weekly Standard, the Saturday Evening Post, the Daily
Caller, the Minneapolis Star-Tribune, the Omaha World-Herald, and
other publications. He has taught at the University of Nebraska-Omaha, the
University of Minnesota, and other institutions.
The US should think long and hard about the high number of
Latino immigrants.
By Lawrence Harrison
It's not just a
short-run issue of immigrants competing with citizens for jobs as unemployment
approaches 10 percent or the number of uninsured straining the quality of
healthcare. Heavy immigration from Latin America threatens our cohesiveness as
a nation.
MEXICO WILL DOUBLE U.S.
POPULATION
By Tom Barrett
At the current rate of invasion (mostly through Mexico, but also
through Canada) the United States will be completely over run with illegal
aliens by the year 2025. I’m not talking about legal immigrants who follow US
law to become citizens. In less than 20 years, if we do not stop the invasion,
ILLEGAL aliens and their offspring will be the dominant population in the
United States.
Open the floodgates of our
welfare state to the uneducated, impoverished, and unskilled masses of the
world and in a generation or three America, as we know it, will be gone. JOHN
BINDER
But many
less-skilled migrants play their largest role by simply shifting small slices
of wealth from person to person, for example, by competing up rents in their
neighborhood or by competing down wages in their workplace. The crudest
examples can be seen in agriculture.
"The public schools indoctrinate their young charges to
hate this country and the rule of law. Illegal aliens continue
overwhelming the state, draining California’s already depleted public
services while endangering our lives, the rule of law, and public safety
for all citizens."
IMMIGRATION AS ECONOMIC WAR ON THE AMERICAN
MIDDLE-CLASS.
However, the dominant force in American politics for the last
two decades has been economic warfare against American citizens.
This economic warfare has two primary components; the use of
government to economically favor one group over another; and the collusion of
immigrant groups to economically inhibit Americans who oppose replacement
migration.
JOSHUA FOXWORTH – AMERICAN THINKER
"This is country
belongs to Mexico" is said by the Mexican Militant. This is a common
teaching that the U.S. is really AZTLAN, belonging to Mexicans, which is taught
to Mexican kids in Arizona and California through a LA Raza educational program
funded by American Tax Payers via President Obama, when he gave LA RAZA
$800,000.00 in March of 2009!
The “mother of all caravans” is forming in Central America, and our
border-enforcement system is at “the breaking point” — all because Democrats in Congress
rejects any effort to plug the legal loopholes that drive the accelerating flood at the border.
In effect, Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer are doing just what Cesar Chavez
complained about 40 years ago: placating employers by allowing the unhindered
importation of cheap labor to undermine the efforts of American workers to
negotiate higher wages. MARK KRIKORIAN
THE
AMNESTY HOAX
But the business community will have little
reason to defend Trump, partly because they have gotten their double-shot of
tax cuts and cheap labor. In fact, the legislation does not sunset the amnesty,
meaning it can be quietly expanded with a few legal tweaks that can be attached
to any of the myriad obscure bills annually passed by Congress.
Yes, it is by invitation of the Democrat and
Republican parties on behalf of their rich paymasters!
"Critics argue that
giving amnesty to 12 to 30 million illegal aliens in the U.S. would have an
immediate negative impact on America’s working and middle class — specifically
black Americans and the white working class — who would be in direct
competition for blue-collar jobs with the largely low-skilled illegal alien
population." JOHN BINDER
The
U.S.-born baby is, of course, a U.S. citizen, whose illegal alien parents are
eligible to receive, on the baby’s behalf, food stamps, nutrition from the
Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) program, and numerous tax benefits,
including the EITC.
Most
importantly, the newborn is deportation insurance for its parents. Illegal
aliens facing deportation can argue that to deport one or more parents would
create an “extreme hardship” for the new baby. If an immigration officer
agrees, we’ve added a new adult to the nation’s population. At age 21 the
former birthright citizen baby can formally apply for green cards for parents
and siblings, and they, in turn, can start their own immigration chains.
US now has more Spanish speakers than Spain – only Mexico
has more
However, the dominant
force in American politics for the last two decades has been economic warfare
against American citizens.
This economic warfare has
two primary components; the use of government to economically favor one group
over another; and the collusion of immigrant groups to economically inhibit
Americans who oppose replacement migration.
JOSHUA FOXWORTH – AMERICAN
THINKER
MEXICO’S INVASION by invitation!
"The amnesty activist also said that the “border has been a
crooked proposition from the beginning, and it will continue to be twisted to
meet political ends,” adding that many open-borders activists still insist that
“people didn’t cross the border, the border crossed them.”
“At some point we will have to accept the fact that the border
between Mexico and the United States is nothing more than an invention. It was
demarcated in 1848, following a war that cost Mexico about half its territory
(it’s no coincidence that cities like Los Angeles, San Antonio and San
Francisco have Spanish names),” Ramos said. “Also, it’s been said a thousand
times that many people didn’t cross the border, the border crossed them. And
the cultural and commercial ties between the two sides remain in place to this
day. Look at the fellowship exhibited by cities like El Paso, Texas, and Ciudad
Juárez, Mexico even if barbed wire and concrete barriers have been erected in
some places along the divide.” LA RAZA SUPREMACIST JORGE RAMOS
1. What nation occupied
the land for 300 years on which Mexicans now live?
2. What nation purchased 525,000 sq. miles of that land from Mexico for $15
million dollars?
3. What nation has a tougher immigration policy than the one who bought the
land?
4. What nation built a wall along its Southern border to keep out illegal
aliens?
5. What nation has millions of Mexican and Central American immigrants who came
here legally and who don't want any illegal immigrants invading their country,
stealing their jobs and bringing gangs, crime, drugs, infectious disease and
human trafficking along with them?
6. What nation has millions of legal Latino immigrants who are proud to be
citizens of a host country that is a sovereign nation with defined borders and
with more individual freedoms and economic opportunities than any place on
earth?
7. What people would like to tell the race-baiting, Jose Ramos, "Vete a la
mierda!"?
ANSWERS:
1. Spain
2. United States
3. Mexico
4. Mexico
5. United States
6. United States
7. Latino Americans and other Americans who are not liberal Democrats.
America
Created Just 20,000 Jobs in February...and those all went to foreign
born!
Exclusive–Mo Brooks:
‘Masters of the Universe’ Want More Immigration to ‘Decrease In mes of
Americans’
Consequently,
the pumping of ultra-cheap money into the financial system,
fueling speculation and parasitism, together with ever-widening
social inequality, is not a temporary measure but must be
made permanent.
The declining living standards of
the working class are feeding directly into the retail apocalypse and
mass layoffs of retail workers will only exacerbate the issue.
Workers’
wages have seen little to no growth in the last four decades, and any
economic growth experienced since 2008 has gone to
“US household net
worth sees biggest fall since crisis”
“Trump Touts
Legal Immigration System for ‘Our Corporations’ at Expense
of
American Workers “– JOHN BINDER
Trump’s shift from a
wage-boosting legal immigration system to one that benefits corporations and
their shareholders coincides with recent big business lobby influence over his
White House, at the behest of advisers Jared Kushner and Brooke Rollins.
“Trump Abandons
‘America First’ Reforms: ‘We Need’ More Immigration to
Grow Business Profits” JOHN BINDER
Additionally, Koch spokespeople at the donors’ conference said the
network has its sights set on pushing amnesty for millions of illegal aliens
this year.
DYING AMERICA: Poverty,
Open Borders, Widespread Homelessness, Housing Crisis, Opioids, Corrupt
Politicians and Then Suicide!
"In a state like Florida, where immigrants make up about 25.4
percent of the labor force, American workers have their weekly wages reduced by
perhaps more than 12.5 percent. In California, where immigrants make up 34
percent of the labor force, American workers’ weekly wages are reduced by
potentially 17 percent." JOHN BINDER
"In the
last decade alone, the U.S. admitted ten million legal immigrants,
forcing American workers to compete against a growing population of low-wage
foreign workers. Meanwhile, if legal immigration continues, there will be 69
million foreign-born residents
living in the U.S. by 2060. This would represent an unprecedented electoral
gain for the Left, as Democrats win about 90 percent of
congressional districts where the foreign-born population exceeds the national
average."
THE INVASION!
MEXICO UNDER, OVER
AND OCCUPYING AMERICA AT STAGGERING COSTS
https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2019/04/mexico-in-meltdown-narco-state-pouring.html
"While other witnesses at Mr. Guzmán’s trial in Federal District Court in
Brooklyn have testified about huge payoffs from traffickers to the Mexican
police and public officials, the testimony about Mr. Peña Nieto was the most
egregious allegation yet. If true, it suggests that corruption by drug cartels
had reached into the highest level of Mexico’s political establishment."
*
The former president of Mexico, Enrique Peña Nieto,
took a $100 million bribe from JoaquÃn
Guzmán Loera, the infamous crime lord known as El Chapo, according to a
witness at Mr. Guzman’s trial. ALAN
FEUER
“Mexican drug cartels are the “other” terrorist threat to
America. Militant Islamists have the goal of destroying the United
States.Mexican drug cartels
are now accomplishing that mission – from within, every day, in
virtually every community across this country.” JUDICIAL WATCH
Migrant
enclaves already are at the top of the U.S. lists for bad places to live -
10 of the 50 worst places in America to live according to this list are in
California, and all of them are famous for their illegal
populations. MONICA SHOWALTER
California—not Mississippi, New Mexico, or West Virginia—has
the highest poverty rate in the United States. According to the Census Bureau’s
Supplemental Poverty Measure—which accounts for the cost of housing, food,
utilities, and clothing, and which includes noncash government assistance as a
form of income—nearly one out of four Californians is poor. Kerry Jackson
California’s de facto status as a one-party state lies at the
heart of its poverty problem. With a permanent majority in the state senate and
the assembly, a prolonged dominance in the executive branch, and a weak
opposition, California Democrats have long been free to indulge blue-state
ideology while paying little or no political price. The state’s poverty problem
is unlikely to improve while policymakers remain unwilling to unleash the
engines of economic prosperity that drove California to its golden years. Kerry Jackson
As Breitbart
News reported, if chain migration is not ended —
as President Donald Trump has demanded — the U.S. electorate will forever be
changed, with between seven to eight million new foreign-born individuals being
eligible to vote because of chain migration, and overall, an additional 15
million new foreign-born voters.
No Justice for Taxpaying Americans By Howie
Carr But the real double standard kicks
in when the undocumented Democrat gets to the courtroom. A taxpaying American
can only dream of the kid-gloves treatment these Third World fiends get.
Illegal aliens continue
overwhelming the state, draining California’s already depleted public services
while endangering our lives, the rule of law, and public safety for all
citizens.Arthur Schaper
The costs of illegal immigration are being carefully hidden by Democrats. MONICA SHOWALTER
The Federation for
American Immigration Reform estimates that California spends $22 billion on
government services for illegal aliens, including welfare, education, Medicaid,
and criminal justice system costs. STEVEN BALDWIN
Heather Mac Donald of the Manhattan
Institute has testified before a Congressional committee that in 2004, 95% of
all outstanding warrants for murder in Los Angeles were for illegal aliens; in
2000, 23% of all Los Angeles County jail inmates were illegal aliens and that
in 1995, 60% of Los Angeles’s largest street gang, the 18th Street gang, were
illegal aliens.
THE DEMOCRAT PARTY’S
WAR ON AMERICA’S LEGAL WORKERS, BORDERS AND LAWS as they build the LA RAZA
welfare state on our backs.
One in
every eleven persons born in Mexico has
gone to the U.S. The National Review reported that in 2014 $1.87 billion was
spent on incarcerating illegal immigrant criminals….Now add hundreds of
billions for welfare and remittances! MICHAEL BARGO, Jr.
"Chairman of the DNC Keith Ellison was even
spotted wearing a shirt stating, "I don't believe in
borders" written in Spanish.
According to a new CBS news poll, 63 percent of Americans in competitive congressional
districts think those crossing illegally should be immediately deported or
arrested. This is undoubtedly contrary to the views expressed by the
Democratic Party.
Their endgame is open borders, which has become evident over
the last eight years. Don't for one second let them convince you
otherwise."Evan Berryhill Twitter @EvBerryhill.
At the current rate of invasion (mostly
through Mexico, but also through Canada) the United States will be completely
over run with illegal aliens by the year 2025.
I’m not talking about legal immigrants who follow US law to become citizens. In
less than 20 years, if we do not stop the invasion, ILLEGAL aliens and their
offspring will be the dominant population in the United States. According to US
Border Control (see LINK below). “They will have made such inroads into the
political and social systems that they will have more influence than our
Constitution over how the U.S. is governed. The ugly consequence of an ignored
U.S. Constitution is already taking place.” The millions upon millions of
illegal aliens streaming into the US are the foundation for what could be another
attempt at secession by several US states. Many of them will use
ill-conceived programs that reward illegal immigration to become US citizens. Other
illegals will simply go to the polls and vote without taking the trouble to
apply for citizenship.Together, these groups could form a voting block
that could tear our nation apart. Those of you who read the email version
of this column should go to www.ConservativeTruth.org to see the map posted there. It shows the
borders of a new nation proposed by influential Mexican nationals and Hispanic
US Citizens. (See LINK below: Professor Predicts 'Hispanic Homeland'.) It
includes six northern states of Mexican, as well as Texas, New Mexico,
Arizona, California, and southern Colorado. The idea of a Hispanic Homeland
could be ignored as the pipedream of crackpots if a substantial majority of
Mexican citizens did not support it. A Zogby poll of Mexicans done in June 2002
revealed that a substantial majority of Mexican citizens believe that
southwestern America properly belongs to Mexico. They said that Mexicans do not
need the permission of the U.S. to enter this territory. 58 percent of Mexican
citizens agreed with this statement: "The territory of the United States'
southwest rightfully belongs to Mexico." Only 28 percent disagreed with
the statement. Listen to what some Mexican government officials and US leaders
(including politicians and Professors at taxpayer-funded Universities) have to
say on this subject. Jose Angel Gutierrez, professor, University of Texas,
Arlington and founder of La Raza Unida political party screams at rallies:
"We have an aging white America. They are dying. They are ******** in
their pants with fear! I love it! We have got to eliminate the gringo, and what
I mean by that is if the worst comes to the worst, we have got to kill
him!" (See LINK below.) Richard Alatorre, Los Angeles City Council
"They’re afraid we’re going to take over the governmental institutions and
other institutions. They’re right. We will take them over. Mario Obledo,
California State Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare under Jerry Brown,
who was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by Bill Clinton, says,
“California is going to be a Hispanic state. Anyone who doesn’t like it should
leave." Proposition 187 was the California initiative supported by a
majority of Californians that denied taxpayer funds for services to
non-citizens. Speaking at a Latino gathering in response to Proposition 187’s
passage in 1995, Art Torres, the Chairman of the California Democratic Party,
said: "Power is not given to you. You have to take it. Remember, 187 is
the last gasp of white America in California." The national newspaper of
Mexico, Excelsior: "The American Southwest seems to be slowly returning
to the jurisdiction of Mexico without firing a single shot." Gloria
Molina, Los Angeles County Supervisor: "We are politicizing every single
one of these new citizens that are becoming citizens of this country...I gotta
tell you that a lot of people are saying, "I’m going to go out there and
vote because I want to pay them back." Jose Pescador Osuna, Mexican Consul
General: “We are practicing ‘La Reconquista’ in California." "Reconquista"
means the reconquest of the US southwest by Mexico. (See LINK below.). These
people are serious! They think they are going to take US territory. The Mexican
President declared it here in our country, and Bill Clinton signed a
Presidential Executive Order that paves the way for at least part of Mexico’s
dream. Mexican President Ernesto Zedillo said in Chicago on July 23, 1997,
"I have proudly affirmed that the Mexican nation extends beyond the
territory enclosed by its borders and that Mexican migrants are an important – a
very important – part of this. For this reason, my government proposed a
constitutional amendment to allow any Mexican with the right and the desire to
acquire another nationality to do so without being forced to first give up his
or her Mexican nationality." Translation: It is next to impossible to
receive Mexican citizenship unless you can prove you are of Mexican descent.
But Mexico knows that the US has soft immigration laws and will grant
citizenship to almost anyone. (After all, we grant citizenship every day to
immigrants from countries who have sworn to destroy us.) So Mexico wants to
take advantage of this ridiculous situation by encouraging their citizens to
apply for US citizenship while keeping Mexican citizenship. That way the
Mexican government can influence the political process here in the US.
Executive Order 13122, signed on May 25, 1999, by the most treasonous president
this nation has ever been cursed with, Bill Clinton, established an Interagency
Task Force on the Economic Development of the Southwest Border. Part of the
Order reads, "The Southwest Border or Southwest Border region is defined
as including the areas up to 150 miles north of the United States-Mexican
border in the States of Arizona, New Mexico, Texas, and California." According
to experts on international law, this sets the stage for a 150-mile-wide
“Border Zone” that will neither belong to Mexico or the US. This could then
become the first area of a Hispanic Nation that would eventually encompass the
areas shown in the map of the proposed Republica del Norte (The Northern
Republic). Our government, pushed by liberal Democrats, has been systematically
laying the groundwork for such a breakaway republic. Did you know that
immigrants from Mexico and other non European countries can come to this
country and get preferences in jobs, education, and government contracts? It’s
called affirmative action or racial privilege. Some time ago a vote was taken
in the U.S. Congress to end this practice. It was defeated. Every single Democratic
senator except Ernest Hollings voted to maintain special privileges for
Hispanic, Asian and African immigrants. They were joined by thirteen
Republicans. Bill Clinton and Al Gore have repeatedly stated that they believe
that massive immigration from countries like Mexico is good. They have also
backed special privileges for these immigrants. Mexico, a nation that has
benefited enormously from American generosity is now working to destabilize our
country. Is “destabilize” too strong a word? I don’t think so. Whether or not
Mexican leaders think they can actually create enough hatred against “gringos”
to accomplish the creation of a new republic made up of mainly US territory,
they know that pushing that agenda will cause huge political problems here and allow
Mexico to accomplish many of their goals. Is the government of Mexico behind
this? You have seen quotes from a Mexican President and a Mexican Consul
General in support of it. They have everything to gain and little to lose by
pushing it. The Mexican government is also pushing illegal immigration, which
destabilizes our economy. The US Border Control website (see LINK below)
shows an illustration from a Mexican government publication showing their
citizens how to best illegally enter the US. Why? It takes the strain of taking
care of unemployed Mexicans off the Mexican treasury and puts it on the US
treasury. And when the illegals get on welfare, they send some of their money
home, which helps the Mexican economy. All this talk by Mexican and US officials
about the US illegally occupying Mexican territory does nothing but breed
racial hatred. The sad thing is that none of this is about race. It is about
the things that all wars and conflicts are about: Greed, power and money. I
don’t like to talk about a problem without offering a solution. The US
politicians and professors who advocate taking US territory are guilty of
sedition. Remove them from their offices and (hopefully) put them in a federal
penitentiary where they can consider the error of their ways. The Mexican
politicians who do the same are guilty of inciting sedition. This is very close
to an act of war. Immediately cut of all economic aid to Mexico until its
government publicly disavows this lunatic plan. Finally, we must realize that
we can’t stop this by marching US troops into Mexico. We should use troops to
guard our borders, because the US Border Patrol cannot cover the huge US-Mexico
border without help. And we need to use pass laws that will stop the government
from rewarding illegal immigrants at the expense of those who follow the law.
We have a huge immigration problem in this country. This ridiculous Hispanic
Homeland idea is just a symptom of the problem. INTERNET RESEARCH: Professor
Predicts 'Hispanic Homeland' 1. http://www.aztlan.net/homeland.htm
Professor Predicts 'Hispanic Homeland'
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — A University of New Mexico Chicano Studies professor
predicts a new, sovereign Hispanic nation within the century, taking in the
Southwest and several northern states of Mexico. Charles Truxillo suggests the
“Republica del Norte,” the Republic of the North, is “an inevitability.” He
envisions it encompassing all of California, Arizona, New Mexico, Texas and
southern Colorado, plus the northern tier of Mexican states: Baja California,
Sonora, Chihuahua, Coahuila, Nuevo León and Tamaulipas. Along both sides of the
U.S.-Mexico border “there is a growing fusion, a reviving of connections,”
Truxillo said. “Southwest Chicanos and Norteño Mexicanos are becoming one
people again.” Truxillo, 47, has said the new country should be brought into
being “by any means necessary,” but recently said it was unlikely to be formed
by civil war. Instead, its creation will be accomplished by the electoral
pressure of the future majority Hispanic population in the region, he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment