Under these conditions, enormous pressure is being brought to bear to convince workers and young people to support the campaign of Biden and Harris. Whatever reservations they may have over the right-wing character of the Democratic Party and its candidates, the argument goes, this is the only way to get rid
Obama continued the most right-wing policies
of George W. Bush (with whom, by the way, he
has established a close personal friendship),
including the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and
the overseeing of the Wall Street bailout
following the 2008 financial collapse. It was the
right-wing policies of Obama and the
nomination of Hillary Clinton on the basis of a
prowar program, glossed over with identity
politics, that created the conditions for the
election of Trump in 2016.
How do we explain
Republicans who support Biden?
By Robert Arvay
I personally know
some Republicans who now support Biden for president. Mind you, these are
people who vigorously opposed Obama's ruinous depredations of the American
economy for eight solid years. They ranted against his treacherous Iran
deal. They decried his open borders policy. They voted for McCain/Palin and then,
four years later, for Romney/Ryan. Finally, they rooted for one or
the other of the Republican contenders in the 2016 primaries — any of them,
that is, except Donald Trump. All the while, they excoriated the Clintons for their
corruption and duplicity.
Then something
mysterious happened. When Trump was nominated, these supposedly
staunchly conservative Republicans seem to have voted, in 2016, for Hillary
Clinton, the woman whom they would have fiercely opposed had the Republican
nominee been Rubio, Cruz, Kasich, or anybody but Trump.
Nothing Trump did,
as president, softened their disdain for the man, even though he revived the
American economy, canceled the Iran giveaway, and decreased illegal immigration
to the extent that any president could, despite being opposed every step of the
way, including by Republicans, even his own White House staff. Trump
did everything the RINOs had said they wanted and the opposite of what Hillary
would have done.
Even today, they
castigate Trump, not for what he is doing, but for how the liberal media twist
their reporting to make it seem that he is a racist, a Hitler, or the devil
himself. In their view, Trump has done nothing right and everything
wrong.
Had
Hillary Clinton won the election, we would have no idea, none, of the depth and
extent of official corruption at the DoJ, the FBI, the CIA, and other agencies
— because Hillary Clinton was fully involved in the corruption. So was
Obama, and so was the new political god of the left, Joe Biden. One
shudders to think of how much worse it would be today had Clinton been
elected.
If
Kamala Harris ever becomes president, she will be no less corrupt, and
certainly no less radical. Biden/Harris will seal the records of
dark state crimes, and the misdeeds will continue even worse than before.
It is as if the
Royal Astronomical Society suddenly decided to promote the Flat Earth
Theory. Photographs of the Earth from orbit, from the moon, and from
even greater distances than that, would be ignored. Gravitation
theory would be replaced by the fantasy of upward thrust of the round disc of
the flat earth. The rising and setting of the sun at different hours
at different locations would in no way dissuade them from their
ideas. Tides, precession, and a plethora of evidence for our global
planet would be discredited.
That is how
illogical it is for supposed opponents of the radical left, spineless RINOs, to
support the Biden/Harris ticket.
Yet there it
is. There they are. It's happening. Their
loyalties are to themselves, and as far as they are concerned, you and your
nation be damned.
YOU CAN'T EVEN ADD UP THE COST OF THE BANKSTER-PLUNDERING OF
AMERICA UNDER BILLARY CLINTON AND BANKSTER-OWNED BARACK OBAMA!
While criticizing “the people who have the most” in Democrat primary debates, Harris raked in thousands in campaign cash from
financial executives from firms such as the Blackstone Group, Morgan Stanley,
Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, and Wells Fargo.
Obama,
Clinton Allies on Wall Street Rally Behind Kamala Harris
16 Aug 2020213
2:46
Executives on Wall Street linked to Hillary Clinton and former
President Barack Obama are rallying behind Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) as
Democrat nominee Joe Biden’s vice presidential pick.
Wells Fargo Vice Chairman for Public Affairs Bill Daley, who
served as Obama’s chief of staff from 2011 to 2012, called a Harris a
“reasonable, rational person who has worked in the system,” in an interview with
the Wall Street Journal.
“Is she a progressive? Yes. Is she someone who wants to burn the
building down? No. I think she wants to strengthen the building,” Daley said.
Likewise, Charles Myers and Lewis Lukens of the financial firm
Signum Global Advisors gave a resounding endorsement of Harris in a memo titled
“Biden’s pick of Harris as VP reinforces centrist ticket.”
Myers and Lukens wrote that Harris is an “energetic and
charismatic candidate and campaigner” with “thirty years of public service and
almost twenty years of campaign experience.”
Myers formerly advised Clinton on the 2016 campaign trail.
Lukens worked as a diplomat for the Obama administration and served in the
State Department while Clinton was Secretary of State.
“Harris, who generally could be called a centrist, will not push
Biden to the left or the right on major policy issues,” they wrote. “She will
be supportive of Biden and the Democratic Party’s policy platform.”
The show of support from Democrat establishment allies on Wall
Street for Harris comes as financial executives similarly voiced their approval
in interviews with the Journal, CNBC, and Bloomberg, as Breitbart News reported.
"Safe, balanced, a woman, diverse,
what’s not to like?" https://t.co/oKY7BFxhDV
— John Binder 👽 (@JxhnBinder) August 13, 2020
A handful of Wall Street executives called Harris a “normal
Democrat” and a “great choice” while another said, “What’s not to like?”
“She’s terrific,” Kynikos Associates founder Jim Chanos told
Bloomberg. “She’s got force of personality in a good way. She takes over a
room. She certainly has a charisma and a presence which will be an asset on the
campaign.”
In the 2019 Democrat presidential primary, Harris won over a
number of Wall Street donors. In Iowa, notably, Harris held a fundraiser backed
by Goldman Sachs Group, Inc — one of the largest multinational banks in the
world.
While criticizing “the people
who have the most” in Democrat primary debates, Harris raked in thousands in campaign cash from financial executives
from firms such as the Blackstone Group, Morgan Stanley, Bank of America,
Goldman Sachs, and Wells Fargo.
John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on
Twitter at @JxhnBinder.
The Democrats
are not even making the pretense of providing a program to address the catastrophe
unfolding in the United States.
The Biden/Harris
campaign and the dead-end of “lesser evil” politics
17 August
2020
The Democratic Party National
Convention is beginning today, a four-day affair that will conclude with the
official nomination Thursday of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris as the Democrats’
candidates for president and vice president. The following week, the Republican
National Convention will be convened to officially renominate Trump, setting
the stage for the final two months of the US elections.
The 2020 elections are being held
under extraordinary conditions. The coronavirus pandemic has spiraled out of
control. More than 170,000 people have already died in the US, and by the time
of the election this figure will be close to or above a quarter of a
million. More than 30 million people are unemployed amidst the greatest
social crisis since the Great Depression. Millions face poverty and eviction
from their homes following the cutoff of federal unemployment benefits three
weeks ago.
There is enormous popular
hostility to the Trump administration, which is directly responsible for this
catastrophe. The policies that it has spearheaded—including the back-to-work
campaign initiated in May and the ongoing efforts to reopen schools—have led to
the deaths of tens of thousands of people. Well aware of growing opposition,
the administration is working to sabotage mail-in voting to deny substantial
portions of the population the right to vote.
Under these conditions, enormous pressure is being brought to bear to convince workers and young people to support the campaign of Biden and Harris. Whatever reservations they may have over the right-wing character of the Democratic Party and its candidates, the argument goes, this is the only way to get rid
This is hardly the first election
in which such “lesser evil” arguments were advanced. In 1988, it was a matter
of voting for Dukakis, the right-wing governor from Massachusetts, to finally
put an end to the Reagan years. After Dukakis lost to George H.W. Bush, the
following election in 1992 became a matter of putting an end to the Bush years
by electing Bill Clinton, whose right-wing policies cleared the path for Bush
II in 2000. In 2008, the argument became the need to elect Obama, the
“candidate of hope and change,” in order to end the disaster produced by Bush
II, above all, the war in Iraq.
Obama continued the most
right-wing policies
of George W. Bush (with whom, by
the way, he
has established a close personal
friendship),
including the wars in Iraq and
Afghanistan and
the overseeing of the Wall Street
bailout
following the 2008 financial
collapse. It was the
right-wing policies of
Obama and the
nomination of Hillary Clinton on
the basis of a
prowar program, glossed over with
identity
politics, that created the
conditions for the
election of Trump in 2016.
This act, in other words, has
been played out before, and each time the result is a further shift to the
right of the entire political establishment.
In this case, amidst all the
hoopla over the “historic” character of the Biden-Harris ticket, attributed
entirely to the race and gender of Harris, the nominees have been selected
through the machinations of the Democratic Party against the candidacy of Bernie
Sanders and even Elizabeth Warren.
Sanders himself is now playing the central role in convincing his previous
supporters that, despite everything, Biden’s election must be the overriding
aim. This was his basic theme in speaking on several of the morning talk shows
yesterday.That is, the Democratic Party’s campaign is founded on a
repudiation of any suggestion that it will carry out a policy of social
reform. The Democrats are not even making the pretense of providing a
program to address the catastrophe unfolding in the United States.
A
particularly revealing exchange came on CNN, when moderator Jake Tapper cited a
comment in the Wall
Street Journal stating that Wall Street breathed a “sigh of
relief” at the nomination of the right-wing ex-prosecutor Harris as vice
president. He then asked, “If Wall Street breathes a sigh of relief with Kamala
Harris being named to the ticket, what does Bernie Sanders do?”
To this, Sanders replied, “Well,
Bernie Sanders does everything that he can to defeat Donald Trump. … Donald
Trump must be defeated. Biden must be elected.” Sanders continued, “And after
the Democrats have control of the Senate and the House, and Joe is the
president, we’re going to do all that we can to mobilize people for a
progressive agenda.”
In fact, the same arguments used
to insist that everything must be subordinated to Biden will be re-employed to
argue that nothing can be done to destabilize a future Biden administration,
because that will only strengthen the right. As always, it is an argument
against any mobilization of the working class against the entire policy of the
ruling elites, represented by both the Democrats and Republicans.
Absent in all of this is any
serious examination of what produced Trump. He is not, after all, some ogre that
has emerged from the depths of hell. Trump is himself a product
of the
capitalist system. He is a
representative of
the financial oligarchy.
There are differences between the
Democrats and Republicans. However, the conflict within the state is between two
factions of the ruling class.
Sections of big business and the
military-intelligence agencies are
opposed to Trump primarily over
issues of foreign policy, particularly in relation to Russia. Summing up the
concerns of the
ruling
class, a comment in the Washington
Post by Josh Rogin
praised the selection of Harris
as vice president because “those
close to Harris describe her as a
‘Truman Democrat,’ a nod to her willingness to use American power to
promote American
values and interests.” That is,
Harris, if she were to
become president, will be willing
to wage
war to advance the interests of
the
American ruling class.
More evidence of corporate
America’s tilt towards the Democrats comes from the reports that the lion’s
share of financial support from the stock market and the major banks is going
to Biden and not Trump, as well as the huge surge in big-money donations that
followed the selection of Harris.
As for the policy of the ruling
class in relation to the pandemic, both parties have united in using the
pandemic to transfer trillions of dollars to Wall Street—sanctioned by the
CARES Act passed in late March—and enforce the back-to-work campaign in states
throughout the country, whether led by Democrats or Republicans.
The basic aim of the Democratic
Party is to strangle and suppress the growing opposition of the working class.
The policies of the ruling elite are producing a social explosion. Teachers and
students are mobilizing against the effort to reopen schools. Workers have
begun forming rank-and-file committees to oppose the homicidal back-to-work
campaign and the unsafe conditions in factories and workplaces.
No comments:
Post a Comment