Tuesday, March 9, 2021

NEO-FASCIST MARK ZUCKERBERG - I OWN THE 'BIG GUY'' JOE BIDEN! - I BOUGHT THE BRIBES SUCKING HO, AND I GOT HIM ELECTED! HE'S MINE UNTIL KAMALA COMES TO SERVE ME

THESE TECH BILLIONAIRES KNOW HOW CORRUPT THESE FILTHY POLITICIANS ARE AND HOW EASY THEY ARE TO BUY. ABOUT LIKE BUYING A WHORE IN AN ALLEY.


Exclusive–Devin Nunes Tackles Big Tech: ‘There Is Nothing These Oligarchs Won’t Do Now’

Jack Knudsen, Matthew Perdie
Volume 90%
5:32

ORLANDO, Florida — Reigning in Big Tech is one of the most important issues Americans can relay to their representatives, Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) told Breitbart News in an exclusive interview during the 2021 Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC).

Nunes detailed the warning outlined in his book Countdown to Socialism, explaining that he wrote it as a caution to people who say “this really can’t happen” in our country. But he said he has observed it his entire life, watching the left moving from a labor party to a radical party in the 60s, 70s, and 80s.

“When I was a kid, it was this radical ‘in the name of the environment’ [movement]. [It] became a radical green movement,” he explained. “And we were used in my area, the agricultural area of California, we were used as the guinea pigs where they would come in and build narratives so that ‘oh we’re just trying to save this little creature from these evil corporate people who are cutting down these trees and it’s causing fires… It was all fake news.'”

The challenge now, he said, is a bit different due to the power of Big Tech, which largely controls the narratives. But decades ago, the late Rush Limbaugh, Nunes said, largely broke the information barrier after essentially taking over AM radio.

“Everybody tuned in because they’re like, wow. I’m hearing things I haven’t heard before, and I’m not hearing these things on the news. And so he was kind of there before the creation of the web,” he said, briefly walking through how former President Trump utilized social media during his 2016 campaign.

“He was able to get above and beyond the traditional legacy, fake news media complex and he was able to, you know, get his information out and reach his voters through things like Facebook Live. And then, of course, right after that, the crackdown occurred and it began. People think that Donald Trump made up the term fake news. It wasn’t. It was Zuckerberg and Obama. [They] are the first ones that I can find that actually made up the term fake news.”

After that, Google and the other tech “oligarchs” opted to crack down on censorship even further, the ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee explained.

“So then Google and the other oligarchs got in and they said ‘OK We’re going to censor places like Breitbart,'” he said.

“They build the narrative. They promote the narrative. People that just want to be out there doing their thing and, you know, taking their kids to soccer practice or what have you, they’re just deluged with, on their devices, with all this garbage and they don’t ever get to see what real investigative work is, like what Breitbart tries to do, what Project Veritas tries to do in terms of holding these people accountable,” Nunes said, admitting that Big Tech went “far beyond” where he ever thought they would go in engaging in censorship.

Noting the similarities to “some of the old Soviet dictators,” Nunes told Breitbart News:

I knew they would shadow ban people on these sites, but I never knew that they would actually eliminate a company from a platform. Apple had so far stayed out of this fight, but you know, now they eliminated a company, essentially. They destroyed them. And Amazon. So there’s nothing these oligarchs won’t do now, so we’re really in a situation. It’s much like California but much bigger where you have a politburo type system where you have people who don’t even have to run for office, like Biden who just hid in his basement. Harris couldn’t even win a primary. She couldn’t even get tenth place in a primary, so she had to drop out.

“They were just kind of propped up and you see that where, you know, Biden maybe makes a — talks to people what? A couple times a week?”

When asked how conservatives can push back on Big Tech, particularly prior to the next election, Nunes stressed the time to fight is “right now.”

“You cannot win a battle for ideas if you have no communications architecture. Right now, we’re relegated to the ghetto… on the internet,” Nunes said, explaining that he has to go directly to websites, such as Breitbart News, in order to get the news because he knows he is not going to see it otherwise.

“I’m sure apps are going to get canceled, and everything else, so that’s not going to work. You can’t win a battle for ideas if you have no way to really communicate with one another and promote your ideas out there to the public,” he said.

People need to make sure their representatives know the “most important issue is to reign in these tech oligarchs and for us to get a social media platform out there that where we can communicate our ideas,” Nunes said, warning it is “going to be really tough to win in the future” if conservatives do not do so.

Actions can also be taken at the state level to combat Big Tech, the California Republican added, highlighting the Big Tech crackdown Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) recently previewed for the Sunshine State:

Then secondly at the state level, it’s not just the federal level. It’s also the state level, and we heard Governor DeSantis here in Florida say it, that if any of these big tech oligarchs censor, they’re going to pass legislation where they’re going to fine by the day if they eliminate political people from their state.

“That’s going to be interesting to watch, and hopefully other states will replicate that because look, you’re not going to reign these guys in,” Nunes added. “These guys are bigger; these big tech companies are bigger than most countries.”

Facebook Censors Wall Street Journal Over ‘Fact Checked’ Coronavirus Op-Ed by Johns Hopkins Surgeon

WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 29: Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg testifies via video conference during an Antitrust, Commercial and Administrative Law Subcommittee hearing on "Online platforms and market power. Examining the dominance of Amazon, Facebook, Google and Apple" on Capitol Hill on July 29, 2020 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Graeme …
Graeme Jennings - Pool/Getty Images
3:57

Facebook’s fact-checkers have come for the Wall Street Journal, causing the mainstream newspaper to be censored on the world’s largest social network, after the Journal published an op-ed from a Johns Hopkins surgeon who argued that the United States is likely to achieve herd immunity to the COVID-19 virus by April.

The surgeon, Dr. Marty Makary, argued that a failure to take natural immunity as well as vaccine immunity into account was leading some to underestimate when herd immunity could be achieved. Citing a 77 percent decline in cases over the past six weeks, Makary called for “contingency planning for an open economy by April.”

Makary also said that other medical experts privately agreed with him, but that they recommended remaining quiet to avoid a premature relaxation of precautionary measures.

“Some medical experts privately agreed with my prediction that there may be very little Covid-19 by April but suggested that I not to talk publicly about herd immunity because people might become complacent and fail to take precautions or might decline the vaccine,” wrote Makary. “But scientists shouldn’t try to manipulate the public by hiding the truth.”

Makary’s op-ed was subsequently “fact-checked” by Health Feedback, a project tied to the World Health Organization and an affiliate of Science Feedback, a group focusing on “fact-checking” skepticism of the man-made climate change theory, a position mainly held by conservatives.

Health Feedback tagged the Wall Street Journal op-ed with the label “missing context” and “misleading,” causing Facebook to censor the article by reducing its distribution across the platform.

“Once we have a rating from a fact-checking partner, we take action by ensuring that fewer people see that misinformation,” Facebook confirmed to the WSJ. 

Responding, the Wall Street Journal editorial board condemned the fact-check as the work of a “progressive health clerisy” presenting their opinions as scientifically-settled fact.

Via the Wall Street Journal:

…the progressive health clerisy don’t like [Makary’s] projection because they worry it could lead to fewer virus restrictions. The horror! Health Feedback’s fact checkers disagree with the evidence Dr. Makary cites as well as how he interprets it. Fine. Scientists disagree all the time. Much of conventional health wisdom about red meat, sodium and cardiovascular risk is still fiercely debated.

The same goes for Covid-19. There’s still much we don’t understand about the virus and its transmission and immunity. Yet Facebook’s fact-checkers “cherry-pick,” to borrow their word, studies to support their own opinions, which they present as fact. So let’s fact-check Facebook’s fact checkers.

The Journal went on to cite evidence in support of Makary’s claims from a range of sources, including the New England Journal of Medicine, the Journal of the American Medical Association, the Lancet, and Science, among others.

The editorial board went on to say that the actions of Facebook and its fact-checkers support the case for reform of Big Tech’s special legal protections.

We’ve been leery of proposals in Congress to modify Section 230 protections that shield internet platforms from liability. But social-media giants are increasingly adding phony fact checks and removing articles flagged by left-leaning users without explanation. In short, they are acting like publishers in vetting and stigmatizing the content of reputable publishers. The legal privileges that enable these companies to dominate public discourse need to be debated and perhaps revised.

Breitbart News has reached out to Health Feedback for comment.

Allum Bokhari is the senior technology correspondent at Breitbart News. He is the author of #DELETED: Big Tech’s Battle to Erase the Trump Movement and Steal The Election.


NYT: Big Tech’s Section 230 Protections Will ‘Survive’ Congress

Mark Zuckerberg Facebook creepy smile
KENZO TRIBOUILLARD /Getty
3:12

In a recent article, the New York Times writes that the law protecting the Masters of the Universe, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA), appears likely to survive, with Congress focusing on making changes to details within the law.

In a recent article titled “Tech’s Legal Shield Appears Likely to Survive as Congress Focuses on Details,” the New York Times writes that while former President Donald Trump called for the repealing of laws that shield tech companies from legal responsibility and President Joe Biden during his candidacy stated that Section 230 should be “revoked,” it is seeming increasingly unlikely that this will happen.

Instead, Congress appears to be focusing on making changes to Section 230 of the CDA that would eliminate protections for specific kinds of content rather than eliminating the law entirely.

The New York Times writes:

One bill introduced last month would strip the protections from content the companies are paid to distribute, like ads, among other categories. A different proposal, expected to be reintroduced from the last congressional session, would allow people to sue when a platform amplified content linked to terrorism. And another that is likely to return would exempt content from the law only when a platform failed to follow a court’s order to take it down.

Even these more modest proposals to the legal shield, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, could ripple across the internet. The adjustments could give companies like Facebook and YouTube an incentive to take down certain types of content while leaving up others. Critics of the ideas also say there is a huge potential for unintended consequences, citing a 2018 law that stripped the immunity from platforms that knowingly facilitated sex trafficking, making some sex work more unsafe.

“I think we are trying to say, ‘How can you narrowly draw some exceptions to 230 in a way that doesn’t interfere with your free speech rights?’” said Senator Mark Warner of Virginia, who has introduced legislation to trim the law with a fellow Democrat, Senator Mazie K. Hirono of Hawaii.

Hany Farid, a professor at the University of California, Berkeley, who researches online misinformation, stated: “I think we want to take as modest of a step as possible. Give it a year or two, see how it unfolds and make adjustments.”

Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR), who co-wrote Section 230 while in the House, used 9/11 as an argument for not repealing the law entirely, stating: “If you remember 9/11, and you had all these knee-jerk reactions to those horrible tragedies. I think it would be a huge mistake to use the disgusting, nauseating attacks on the Capitol as a vehicle to suppress free speech.”

Read more at the New York Times here.

Lucas Nolan is a reporter for Breitbart News covering issues of free speech and online censorship. Follow him on Twitter @LucasNolan or contact via secure email at the address lucasnolan@protonmail.com

No comments: