KAMALA HARRIS, THE GODLESS.
https://kamala-harris-sociopath.blogspot.com/2020/10/kamala-harris-godless-just-follow-money.html
Harris is no friend of religious liberty. Her recent decision to exclaim in the year of our Lord, which has been conveniently picked up by her staff, is a ploy designed to appeal to unassuming Christian voters impressed by "God talk." As the old adage says, actions speak louder than words, and on this score, Harris fails to convince.
It is the handmaidens working for Planned
Parenthood who have joked about selling aborted
baby body parts. And it was Kamala Harris, when
she was A.G. of California, who viciously
prosecuted the young man who exposed that
scandal, after she had received a hefty donation
from Planned Parenthood.
It is the handmaidens working for Planned Parenthood who have joked about selling aborted baby body parts. And it was Kamala Harris, when she was A.G. of California, who viciously prosecuted the young man who exposed that scandal, after she had received a hefty donation from Planned Parenthood.
ABORTION KILLS…. the innocent!
PLANNED PARENTHOOD:
America’s baby murdering factories…. Your tax dollars at work
“I Cut the Vocal Cord So The Baby Can't Scream.”
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/03/baby-butcher-dr-leah-torres-in-salt.html
Dr. Leah Torres, an OB/GYN in Salt Lake City, Utah, said that when she performs certain abortions she cuts the vocal cord of the baby so "there's really no opportunity" for the child to scream. She also described herself as a "uterus ripper outer" because she performs hysterectomies.
Is ‘Justice Kamala Harris’ in the Supreme Court’s future?
The Democrat party desperately wanted the White House and engaged in all sorts of election chicanery to get it. They’re now saddled with an increasingly senile man whose decades of corruption (most of it involving using his son to sell out American interests) are catching up with him and a woman who is so gauche, unpleasant, and ineffective that just about everyone despises her. Because it’s a given, no matter what he says, that Biden cannot run in 2024 and probably won’t last that long, the Democrat party pooh-bahs are trying to dispose of Harris. A British outlet reports that the Supreme Court is one option the Democrats are considering.
Because the mainstream media are nothing more than propagandists for the Democrat party, it’s often difficult to get honestly reported insights into what’s going on in American politics. That’s where the foreign press comes in handy. The Telegraph, which is Britain’s more right-leaning paper (although it’s hardly conservative by American conservative standards), reported yesterday that the Democrats, in their desperation to rid themselves of Harris are looking to the possibility that they can park her on the Supreme Court:
Democrats desperately scrambling to find a potential successor to Joe Biden in 2024 are whispering about a potential nuclear option that could see Kamala Harris, the current Vice President, nominated to the Supreme Court.
While the scenario is highly improbable, and perhaps a reflection of a Washington rumour mill in overdrive, the fact it has come up at all shows the depths of the predicament the Biden administration currently finds itself in, amid rising inflation, a stalled domestic agenda, and foreign policy disasters.
Polls are now regularly showing Mr Biden's approval rating below 40 per cent, and panic set in at the White House after a recent poll put Kamala Harris at an unelectable 28 per cent.
[snip]
The left-field Supreme Court theory would mean Mr Biden nominating Ms Harris, a former high-flying prosecutor, if a seat on the court became available over the next three years, which it may well. Mr Biden could then use Section 2 of the 25th Amendment to nominate a more popular vice president.
That person would be the presumptive Democrat nominee should Mr Biden not run for re-election at the age of 82.
If Mr Biden stepped down before Nov 2024, the new vice president, under Section 1 of the 25th Amendment, would assume the presidency, and be able to run as an incumbent.
If that sounds familiar to you, it’s because, right here at American Thinker, Clayton Spann suggested that as one way of dealing with Harris’s awfulness. He posited it as a joke, though, while the Democrats seem to view the possibility seriously.
Of course, one of the problems for Democrats with this plan is that Harris has demonstrated that she’s not very bright. Whether they’re from the left or the right of the political spectrum, Americans expect their Supreme Court justices to be smart. Kamala is not. She is, instead, a singularly dull woman.
Image: Kamala Harris (edited in befunky). YouTube screen grab.
Kamala’s been unable to handle any of the responsibility given her and, lacking both charm and quick-wittedness, hasn’t been able to cover her failures. Instead, the NASA-sponsored video of her phony behavior with the child actors seemed like the most painful thing ever, right until Kamala put on a phony French accent and waved her arms around while speaking to French scientists. And then there’s her mind-numbing, puerile discussion about inflation.
If Biden nominates Harris to fill a Supreme Court vacancy, it’s hard to imagine Democrat senators, no matter how partisan they are, having the courage to report back to their voters that they put a woman with the brain of a peahen on the Supreme Court. Even court-packing looks better than this move.
Nevertheless, as The Telegraph acknowledges, the fact that Democrats are floating this idea reveals that, in their desperation to win—an effort that included getting a Black(ish) female on the ticket after Biden rashly promised to do so—the Democrats saddled themselves with someone who makes Frau Blucher look charming.
No wonder that various articles predict that the Democrats are setting the wheels in motion to dump Harris and, instead, get Michelle Obama, Hillary Clinton, or Pete Buttigieg into that vice presidential seat. Then, when Democrats give Biden the boot, these charmers will enter the Oval Office. The problem is that they’re as problematic as Harris herself.
Pete Buttigieg is a man of no accomplishments whatsoever, other than being gay, having been the mayor of a struggling town that didn’t improve under his mayoralty, and having a mellifluous voice. His tenure at the Department of Transportation has not improved on the record.
Hillary Clinton is probably the least likable woman in American politics. Also, the fact that she violated national security and created the Russia hoax will not endear her to independent voters.
As for Michelle Obama, she seems genuinely to hate the idea of politics when she can just live the lush life of a multi-millionaire. The Democrats may want her but it’s not at all clear that she wants the Democrats.
It seems that the Democrats, having made their bed, are stuck sleeping with a grotesque old man and the world’s most unappealing (politically) woman. It couldn’t happen to a more deserving bunch of people.
If you would like to comment on this or any other American Thinker article or post, we invite you to visit the American Thinker Forum at MeWe. There, you can converse with other American Thinker readers and comment freely (subject to MeWe's terms of use). The Forum will be fully populated and ready for comments by midday (Eastern time) each day.
Kamala’s Proportions
While under anesthetic for a colonoscopy on November 19, Joe Biden handed the reins of power to Kamala Harris, for 85 minutes the most powerful person in the world. That same Friday, a Wisconsin jury declared accused murderer Kyle Rittenhouse not guilty of all charges. Later that night Harris tweeted, “Today’s verdict speaks for itself. I’ve spent a majority of my career working to make our criminal justice system more equitable. It’s clear, there’s still a lot more work to do.”
Harris, a UC Hastings law grad, is the former attorney general of California. She mentioned none of the evidence in the Rittenhouse case and no revelations from the trial. As the proceedings confirmed, Kyle Rittenhouse had not carried an illegal weapon across state lines to attack peaceful protesters. He was protecting life and property and came under attack from armed, violent rioters.
Judge Bruce Schroeder tossed the weapons charge. That effectively upheld the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms, and the basic human right of self-defense. Absent his rifle, Rittenhouse would have been carried by six instead of being judged by 12.
By claiming there’s “more work to do” for an “equitable” justice system. Harris effectively disagrees with the verdict. That invites a look at her experience as state attorney general and district attorney of San Francisco. Backed by former boyfriend Willie Brown, the powerful Assembly Speaker who appointed Harris to lucrative sinecures, Harris unseated Terence Hallinan in 2003.
The next year, gang member David Hill deployed an AK-47 to gun down San Francisco police officer Isaac Espinoza. Under a California law passed in 1973, criminals who murder police officers are eligible for the death penalty. At a memorial service for the slain officer, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, said “This is not only the definition of tragedy, it’s the special circumstance called for by the death penalty law.”
The San Francisco Police Officers Association wanted Harris to seek the death penalty for Hill, but the district attorney declined and instead pursued a life sentence. Harris never spoke to Espinoza’s widow Renata about that decision, and according to Renata, Harris “never came over and said ‘I’m sorry for your loss.’ Never. Nothing.”
Attorney General Harris targeted for-profit colleges, supported gun control, and looked the other way at government corruption. In 2014, California’s attorney general kept quiet when Mexican national Luis Bracamontes gunned down police officers Danny Oliver and Michael Davis in Sacramento. In 2015, repeatedly deported Mexican felon Jose Inez Garcia Zarate shot and killed Kate Steinle on a San Francisco pier. Attorney General Harris defended the city’s sanctuary policy and failed even to decry “gun violence” in the case.
That same year, Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik killed 14 unarmed innocents and wounded 22 at an office party in San Bernardino. A year later Harris issued a statement on the “devastating and tragic terrorist attack,” but failed to name a single victim or the terrorists who shot them dead. None of these cases changed Harris’ view on criminal justice.
“We are talking about a system that creates a final punishment without any requirement that there be DNA to prove it,” Harris told reporters as she campaigned for the Democrats’ presidential nomination. “It is a system where it has been fundamentally proven to be applied to African American and Latino men and poor men disproportionately for the same kind of crime.”
According to the proportionality doctrine, the system must reflect the ethnic proportions of society, and if not, the cause can only be deliberate bias. As Thomas Sowell has often noted, nothing in society reflects ethnic proportionality, a leftist superstition not found in the Constitution or in law.
Personal differences, effort and choice cause variations in outcome, even in the same groups. People in all ethnic groups are prosecuted in the proportion to which they commit crimes, and according to the evidence in their case.
The composite character David Garrow described in Rising Star: The Making of Barack Obama once called Kamala Harris “by far the best looking attorney general in the country.” That is a matter of debate but there’s no question that Harris is a true believer in the proportionality dogma, which is not law and no basis for justice.
As it turns out, Kamala Harris may be the one with “more work to do.” This month, only 28 percent of Americans approve of Harris’ job performance, lower than Joe Biden, now down to 36 percent.
Lloyd Billingsley is a policy fellow at the Independent Institute in Oakland, Calif.
Image: Gage Skidmore
REMEMBER, FACTS NEVER GET INTO THE WAY OF A LYING SOCIOPATH LAWYER!
KAMALA AND MICHELLE ARE TWO RACIST LYING LAWYERS!
Jussie Smollett Finally on Trial Nearly 3 Years After Prominent Democrats Embraced Obvious Hate Crime Hoax
Kamala Harris called alleged attack a 'modern-day lynching'
Jussie Smollett, the disgraced actor who portrayed Terry Hall in The Mighty Ducks, is finally standing trial for allegedly staging a hate crime against himself in January 2019. Smollett appeared in a Chicago courtroom on Monday for jury selection. He faces multiple counts of felony disorderly conduct for his role in the alleged hate crime hoax, which was widely and credulously embraced by prominent Democratic politicians at the time.
Smollett maintains his innocence despite the fact that Nigerian brothers Abimbola and Olabinjo Osundairo told police the actor wrote them a $3,500 check to stage the attack and put a rope around his neck to ensure the incident would be treated as a hate crime. They also claim Smollett mailed a threatening letter to himself one week prior to the staged assault.
The actor, who was in Chicago filming the Fox series Empire, claimed he was attacked by two white men wearing "Make America Great Again" hats and shouting racist and homophobic slurs. Smollett insists he did not lie to police when he reported the attack. His attorney has suggested the Nigerian brothers could have been wearing "whiteface." Otherwise, the evidence of his involvement in the hoax is overwhelming.
When news of the alleged hate crime broke, prominent Democratic politicians rushed to condemn the actions of the racist Trump supporters who were allegedly roaming the streets of Chicago at 2 a.m. to commit a hate crime against a celebrity of minimal renown. "This was an attempted modern-day lynching," wrote Kamala Harris, days after announcing her campaign for president. "No one should have to fear for their life because of their sexuality or color of their skin. We must confront this hate."
The Osundairo brothers came forward weeks later, prompting police to investigate Smollett for his role in orchestrating the alleged hate crime. Harris laughed awkwardly and froze up when asked to defend her comments. "Um, uh, OK," Harris told reporters in February 2019. "I think the facts are still unfolding, and I'm very concerned about obviously the initial allegation that [Smollett] made about what might have happened." Despite initially rushing to comment before all of the facts were known, Harris said she wouldn't comment on any other allegations until "the investigation has concluded."
Joe Biden also rushed to judgment in the immediate aftermath of the incident. "What happened today to Jussie Smollett must never be tolerated in this country," he wrote. "We must stand up and demand that we no longer give this hate safe harbor; that homophobia and racism have no place on our streets or in our hearts. We are with you, Jussie." Other presidential hopefuls, including Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D., Mass.), Sen. Bernie Sanders (I., Vt.), and then-mayor Pete Buttigieg, released similar statements in support of the actor. Sanders, for example, said the alleged attack was "a horrific instance of the surging hostility toward minorities around the country."
On a somewhat related note, nearly all of the 2020 Democratic candidates repeatedly expressed concern about the harmful effects of "disinformation." Alas, little progress has been made on that front, as evidenced by the widespread misunderstanding of the facts of the Kyle Rittenhouse case.
Less than a month after the "attack," Smollett was indicted on multiple counts of disorderly conduct and filing a false police report. Kim Foxx, the Cook County state's attorney, subsequently dropped the charges following an intervention by Michelle Obama's former chief of staff, Tina Tchen. Smollett was indicted again on similar charges in February 2020 following widespread public criticism of Foxx's handling of the case.
Smollett could face several years in prison if convicted, but most observers expect probation would be the most likely outcome of a guilty verdict. The trial is expected to produce some amusing moments as Smollett's defense team attempts to make their preposterous case of innocence in the face of all evidence. Perhaps they will echo the concerns of a group of celebrities and other left-wing activists who accused Chicago police of having "fabricated" the case against the actor.
Whether Smollett's career will survive the trial is another question entirely. In the years since the alleged hate crime, the actor has become a punch line for comedians—at least the talented ones who aren't afraid of being canceled. Dave Chappelle poked fun at Smollett during his 2019 Netflix special Sticks & Stones. "Black people never feel sorry for the police, but this time we even felt sorry for the police," he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment