Besides being major contributors to Democrats over the years, what else do the following people have in common?
- Alex Murdaugh
- Bernie Madoff
- George Soros
- Jeffrey Epstein
- Samuel Bankman Fried
- Mark Zuckerberg
- Marc Rich
They were all involved with serious crimes.
Besides committing murder, Murdaugh, was a serial thief. Why hasn’t the media demanded that Hillary, Biden, and others send back their contributions in order to help pay the victims?
Alex Murdaugh’s Political Contributions Include Maximum Donations to Joe Biden,
Hillary Clinton
Bernie Madoff was a career criminal who stole billions and some of that money went to politicians who were mostly Democrats. I don’t believe the politicians gave the money to a victim’s fund.
Madoff and Company Spent Nearly $1 Million on Washington Influence
Madoff made a fortune, and he played politics with some of that money. In total, he and his wife, Ruth, have given $238,200 to federal candidates, parties and committees since 1991, with Democrats getting 88 percent of that. Overall, Madoff and other individuals at his company, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, gave $372,100 in campaign contributions since 1991, with 89 percent to Democrats.
George Soros was convicted of a felony in France and served no time. He spends massive amounts of money on radical leftist causes to remake and destroy America, including supporting radical soft-on-crime prosecutors.
If you look Soros up on the internet, he is described as a businessman and philanthropist instead of a radical, leftist felon. There is nothing philanthropic about seeking to destroy America including by destroying cities with prosecutors who let dangerous career criminals roam the streets.
Soros Is Found Guilty in France On Charges of Insider Trading
Jeffrey Epstein was convicted of abusing and using young girls. In a world with journalists, Hollywood, and Democrats who care, they would be looking hard for other culprits who enjoyed Epstein’s activities, but there seems to be little interest in learning the names and activities of powerful men. They have as much interest as they did in all the women the Clintons physically and mentally abused.
The Me-Too movement was fake.
Billionaire sex offender Epstein gave heavily to Democrats, until he didn’t
Jimmy Kimmel even made fun of Aaron Rodgers for wanting to know who Jeff Epstein associated with. That shows how little Kimmel cares about abused women and their accusers.
Besides stealing billions, Bankman Fried made tens of millions in illegal campaign contributions. Why hasn’t that money been paid into a victims’ fund?
Bankman-Fried charged with hundreds of illegal campaign donations
The FTX co-founder is accused of "flooding the political system with tens of millions of dollars in illegal contributions," according to a new indictment.
In 2016, the media complained that Russia interfered in the election by spending hundreds of thousands on social media outlets.
Yet they didn’t care when Mark Zuckerberg spent hundreds of millions in 2020 to interfere in elections while committing fraud. Instead of caring about the fraud, they falsely accuse anyone who questioned the 2020 election of being a liar and denier. The liars and deniers are people who knew about the fraud and other questionable things and tell the public that the election was clean.
Most of the media has sought to destroy Fox News as unreliable for a long time and now they are attacking them because some people on Fox questioned the 2020 election.
When will WaPo, NYT, USA Today, CNN, PBS, NPR, CBS, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, etc. come clean about their intentional lies on Russian collusion, Hunter’s laptop, COVID, and by falsely saying the 2020 election was completely clean? The answer is never because truth and objectivity haven’t mattered for a long time, only power for leftists
Election report finds Facebook mogul’s ‘Zuck Bucks’ broke law, swayed election outcome in Wisconsin
A 2020 election integrity probe in Wisconsin reported findings Tuesday that a nonprofit group funded by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg committed election bribery when it targeted $8.8 million in get-out-the-vote funds to five heavily Democratic jurisdictions.
Marc Rich was on the most wanted list for a long time but all he had to do to be above the law was donate to the Clintons.
Clinton pardon of Rich a saga of power, money
President Clinton's pardon of Marc Rich is a saga of secrecy, tenacity, sleight of hand and pressure from Rich's ex-wife and one of her friends, who together have steered millions of dollars to Bill and Hillary Rodham Clinton's causes and those of fellow Democrats.
The saga began in the fall of 1999. Rich was No. 6 on the government's list of most wanted fugitives. He had been on the lam, albeit a posh one, for 16 years, ever since his 1983 indictment by a grand jury on more than 50 counts of wire fraud, racketeering, trading with the enemy and evading more than $48 million in income taxes.
The government accused him of conspiring with Iran in 1980 to purchase over 6 million barrels of oil, in violation of a trade embargo imposed by the United States because Iran was holding 52 Americans hostage in the U.S. Embassy in Tehran. Payments for the oil, federal agents said, were made fraudulently through American banks and by the illegal use of American telecommunications facilities.
Eric Holder helped facilitate the pardon, and the media once pretended to care.
Marc Rich pardon may haunt Holder
The media complains that there is too much money in politics, so why do they raise prices during high demand election periods? Isn’t that gouging?
Joe Biden and other Democrats say they care about equity, equality and fairness, so why don’t they take their advantage in campaign funds and equalize the balance in their opponents’ accounts to achieve equity? Shouldn’t they pay reparations to all their opponents who have lost because they were underfunded?
Conclusion: The media and other Democrats don’t really care about any of the following:
- Too much money in politics
- Where the donations come from
- Paying back victims of crime.
- Soft on crime prosecutors
- Equity
- Equality
- Fairness.
They care only about power.
On a side note: Why do so many people posing as reporters have so much interest in an ethics investigation of Santos and so little in an ethics investigation of AOC? The answer is they are Democrats and don't care.
Photo credfit: Jericho CC BY 3.0 license
THE BIDEN CRIME FAMILY
Jesse Watters: The people responsible won’t talk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=otRC_w7h8Iw
The main objective of “political animals” like Obama and the Clintons is to get elected; it’s not to fix a broken America, nor to protect her. There are people who govern and there are people who campaign; Obama and the Clintons are the latter. Just look at the huge Republican electoral gains under Obama and the Clintons. It’s amazing that Democrats who still care about their party still support the very people who have brought it down.
Jesse Watters: The Clintons' crooked connections
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnPSvkxKuLg
All criminal roads lead back to Hillary Clinton: Former US attorney
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7rTyFs8gbpU
HILLARY CLINTON: THREAT TO AMERICA!
Tucker: Trump was right about this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hb-fQTm_fP0
Victorious Democrats would also end congressional investigations into the Hillary-Deep State-DNC-Russian-Clinton Foundation collusion and corruption. All the players in these massive, sordid affairs will be deemed “too big to jail” – and too closely tied to the Democratic Party to be investigated further.
Before Donald Trump was even elected president and throughout the entire period of his administration, the Leftist establishment that is entrenched in Washington officialdom and among the propaganda outlets that are known as the major news organizations inundated us with nonsense about how he had improperly colluded with Russia in order to gain the White House, and was still in Vladimir Putin’s pocket. There was, as is now well-known, nothing whatsoever to it; it was all a hoax designed to discredit Trump and destroy his presidency, although like the Japanese soldiers found hiding in the woods in the 1970s, not knowing that the war was over, there are still some holdouts on the far Left who insist it was all true. And actually it was, but not of Donald Trump. If you want actual Russian collusion, take a look at Old Joe Biden.
The New York Post reported Thursday that “two Russian billionaires who have managed to dodge US sanctions over Moscow’s year-old invasion of Ukraine went property shopping with Hunter Biden, dined with then-Vice President Joe Biden, and discussed ‘favors’ they might swap.” That’s collusion for you, but of course the Washington establishment that went after Trump with such vicious ferocity over nothing whatsoever is entirely indifferent to this fresh evidence that the demented corruptocrat they installed in the White House is as crooked as the day is long. Russian collusion is only of interest to this establishment when it can be used as a political tool; when people on their side do it, it’s entirely beneath notice.
Well, almost entirely. The Biden regime’s Treasury Department did take notice long enough on Friday to spare two Russian pals of Joe and Hunter, Yelena Baturina and Vladimir Yevtushenkov, from “a fresh batch of sanctions.” The UK and Australia have sanctioned Yevtushenkov, but not the Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave. And with a level of understatement that was positively Hemingwayesque, an anonymous source whom the Post says has “firsthand knowledge of the business relationship between Hunter Biden and Yevtushenkov,” says: “I think it’s very fishy.”
So does Michael McFaul, who is such a right-wing Trumpian ideologue that he served as Barack Obama’s ambassador to Russia. “I think he should be sanctioned,” McFaul said of Yevtushenkov. “I don’t understand why he has not been.”
I do, Mike. It’s really quite simple. Yevtushenkov hasn’t been sanctioned because he had the good judgment to do business with Hunter and Joe Biden. This gives the Russian an all-purpose Get-Out-of-Jail-Free card, as the Washington establishment will do anything it can possibly do to shield the Bidens from the consequences of their corrupt dealings, and to keep the American people from discovering just how crooked the man who pretends to be president really is.
And he is. Yevtushenkov “admitted last year he met with Hunter Biden for breakfast at the Ritz-Carlton in Manhattan on March 14, 2012 — but denied any further contact.” He was, the terminally naïve will be surprised to learn, lying: “emails and calendar entries from Hunter’s former laptop show that they were set to meet again on Jan. 27, 2013, for dinner at DC’s Cafe Milano before looking at a commercial real estate development the next day near Dulles International Airport in northern Virginia.” The Post’s source recounted: that he asked Yevtushenkov why he was meeting with Hunter, and the Russian billionaire replied: “I think it would be good to have a good relationship with this guy … maybe he can do a favor for us and we can do a favor for him.” The source added: “It was a complete quid pro quo that he was going in for.” Collusion and quid pro quo! It looks as if yet again the Left has engaged in the old tactic of accusing the other side of that which they are guilty of doing. The source added: “I told him that’s not the way it works in America, [but] he basically laughed at me and told me I was so naïve.”
Indeed. And wait, there’s more: “A different source, meanwhile, told The Post he vividly recalled Baturina and her husband, ex-Moscow Mayor Yury Luzhkov, looking ‘like an odd couple’ at a now-infamous, intimate dinner with Hunter and his father, the then-vice president.” Also at the dinner was “Vadym Pozharskyi, an executive at Ukrainian energy company Burisma, which paid Hunter up to $1 million per year beginning in 2014 while his VP dad controlled the Obama administration’s Ukraine policy. Pozharskyi emailed Hunter the next day to thank him for ‘giving an opportunity to meet your father.’”
But Old Joe Biden knows how the game is played. He “called the report a false ‘Russian plant’ at the time and social media platforms Twitter and Facebook initially censored it.” Even now, he will face no political consequences for all this Russian collusion. That’s only for presidents who dare to put America first.
Reader Interactions
No comments:
Post a Comment