America Faces No Greater Threat Than Joe Biden and the Democrat Party. Their Assault to Our Borders Is As Great As Their Assault to Free Speech and Free Elections
Thursday, July 13, 2023
Nearly 40% of Dems Say Biden Likely Took Foreign Money - THE OTHER 60% NEED TO GET REFUNDS ON THEIR LOBOTOMIES
WE CAN'T SAVE AMERICA UNTIL WE PUT BIDEN IN PRISON.
Nearly 40% of Dems Say Biden Likely Took Foreign Money
President Joe Biden makes the zero sign / Getty Images
New polling shows the majority of Americans, including a large portion of Democrats, believe that President Joe Biden has taken bribes and payments from foreign sources.
By a more than two-to-one majority, Americans believe the accusations against the president and his family, according to a poll conducted this month by Issues & Insights. Fifty-six percent of those polled said the bribery allegations are "likely" true while only 27 percent said they are "unlikely."
Thirty-nine percent of Democrats said the accusations are likely and 42 percent said they are unlikely.
The pollsters said in their analysis that of the 36 demographic and political categories, only two categories, Democrats and liberals, did not say in a majority or plurality that Biden is likely guilty.
The data come after reports have surfaced for months detailing allegations that Biden and his family, namely his son Hunter Biden, took money from foreign entities, including in China, Ukraine, and Romania.
Texts surfaced last month showing Hunter Biden invoking his father's name to threaten a Chinese businessman to pay up.
"Z if I get a call or text from anyone involved in this other than you, Zhang or the Chairman I will make certain that between the man sitting next to me and every person he knows and my ability to forever hold a grudge that you will regret not following my direction," Hunter Biden told Henry Zhao, an official with the Chinese military intelligence-linked energy company CEFC China Energy in 2017. "I am sitting here waiting for the call with my father. I sure hope whatever it is you are doing is very very very important."
Biden denied any knowledge of the texts. "No, I wasn’t!" Biden shouted at a reporter who asked in late June if he was with his son when the threat was sent. The WashingtonFree Beacon found that photos on Hunter Biden's abandoned laptop place him at his father's house the day the messages were sent.
Hunter Biden agreed in June to plead guilty to misdemeanor tax crimes, a move that will likely keep him out of prison. The plea deal ends a five-year probe by the Justice Department into Biden's taxes.
An IRS whistleblower alleged that the Justice Department shielded Hunter Biden and his father from scrutiny, undermining the tax investigation.
"There were certain investigative steps that we weren't allowed to take that could have led us to President Biden," whistleblower Gary Shapley said. "We needed to take them."
House Republicans probing the Biden family's foreign dealings said the plea deal with the Department of Justice will not impact their investigation into the Biden family's overseas business dealings.
The prosecutors leading the charge against Gal Luft, who claims to have damning information about the Biden family's ties to China, have donated to President Joe Biden and other Democrats, campaign finance records show.
The U.S. Attorney's Office in Manhattan unsealed charges this week against Luft, who claims to have given the FBI information in 2019 about the Biden family's Chinese business dealings. Assistant U.S. attorneys Catherine Ghosh and Daniel Richenthal, who conducted the interview with Luft in 2019, are the two lead prosecutors on his case, court records show. Both have contributed exclusively to Democrats. Ghosh made 35 contributions in the 2020 election cycle to Biden's campaign and the Democratic National Committee, according to campaign finance records. Richenthal contributed to the 2008 Obama-Biden campaign when he served in private practice, the records show.
The revelations come as IRS whistleblowers and Republicans question whether federal prosecutors, for political reasons, stymied investigations into Hunter Biden's foreign business dealings. IRS whistleblowers have alleged that Biden-appointed federal prosecutors in Los Angeles and Washington, D.C., blocked requests to file tax charges against Hunter Biden in their jurisdictions. The whistleblowers also claim that investigators were prohibited from fully investigating the Biden family's foreign business ventures, including with CEFC China Energy.
The charges against Luft have already sparked allegations of a double standard in how the administration investigates the first family.
"The amazing thing is we don't prosecute foreign corruption and failure to register as a foreign agent when it's Hunter Biden. We do when it's somebody who specifically is accusing and says they have information about the wrongdoing of the Biden family," Rep. Darrell Issa (R., Calif.) said this week after Luft's indictment was unsealed.
Prosecutors charged Luft, the co-director of the Institute for the Analysis of Global Security, with violating the Foreign Agents Registration Act through his work for CEFC China Energy. He is accused of recruiting former CIA director James Woolsey on behalf of CEFC China Energy to write articles touting pro-Beijing policies. According to the indictment, Luft failed to register with the Justice Department for his work for a "Chinese foreign principal."
Hunter Biden has avoided similar charges, even though CEFC China Energy paid him nearly $6 million for business and legal consulting in 2017 and 2018. Joe Biden was also allegedly involved in his son's work for CEFC China Energy. Longtime Biden family friend Rob Walker told the FBI in December 2020 that Joe Biden and his son took part in a meeting with CEFC China Energy executives at the Four Seasons in Washington, D.C. That contradicts Joe Biden's claims to have no involvement in his son's business ventures.
Richenthal and Ghosh have investigated CEFC China Energy since at least 2017 when they handled the prosecution of Patrick Ho, a CEFC China Energy executive with ties to both Hunter Biden and Luft. Ho was indicted in November 2017 for attempting to bribe two African officials on behalf of CEFC China Energy. CEFC China Energy paid Hunter Biden $1 million to represent Ho in the case.
Richenthal asked the judge presiding over the Ho case to redact Biden’s name from emails introduced as evidence at trial, according to court transcripts.
"Our view is that the name of that individual is not relevant and could introduce a political dimension to this case that we don't think is worth dealing with," Richenthal said at Ho’s trial, referring to a December 2015 email in which Hunter Biden was invited to a dinner with CEFC China Energy chairman Ye Jianming.
Luft met with Richenthal, Ghosh, and four FBI agents in Brussels in March 2019, shortly after Ho was convicted at his bribery trial. Luft has said he told the prosecutors that CEFC China Energy paid Hunter Biden to use the Biden family’s connections to the FBI in order to find out whether CEFC China Energy and its chairman, Ye Jianming, were under investigation. Luft also said he told prosecutors that CEFC China Energy paid Hunter Biden to promote the Belt and Road Initiative, the Chinese government’s infrastructure investment initiative.
Prosecutors charged Luft with lying during the interviews in Brussels, which occurred on March 28 and 29, 2019, regarding his attempts to broker weapons sales on behalf of CEFC China Energy.
The U.S. attorney’s office in Manhattan did not respond to a request for comment.
DOJ Indicts Gal Luft for FARA Violations with CEFC, Which Bankrolled Bidens
The Justice Department indicted the “missing” Biden family whistleblower, Dr. Gal Luft, for failing to register as a foreign agent of CEFC China Energy Co, the same company for which Hunter Biden worked.
Luft, who claims he is a fall guy, is a fugitive after skipping bail in Cyprus in April while awaiting extradition. Authorities charged Luft with conspiring to sell Chinese weapons to the UAE, Kenya, and Libya, violating the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), and making a false statement.
Luft claims he gave the incriminating evidence of Biden family wrongdoing about CEFC to the FBI and the DOJ in Brussels at a March 2019 meeting. He alleges U.S. authorities covered up the interview.
On Monday, the Justice Department brought multiple charges against Luft, including not registering as a foreign agent of CEFC, a FARA violation, page 21 of the inducement shows:
GAL LUFT, the defendant, and others known and unknown, at least one of whom is expected to be brought to and arrested in the Southern District of New York, willfully and knowingly did combine, conspire, confederate, and agree together and with each other to commit an offense against the United States, to wit, to knowingly and willfully act as an agent of a foreign principal, namely, CEFC, CEFC China, and CC-1, without registering with the Attorney General, in violation of FARA, 22 U.S.C. §§ 612 and 618.
Hunter Biden worked closely with CEFC. In fact, the “chairman” of CEFC, Ye Jianming, paid Hunter Biden a $1 million retainer fee for legal services in 2017. Hunter also received a large diamond from Ye in February 2017 worth an estimated $80,000.
Suspicious activity reports obtained by House Republicans show Hunter Biden’s business partner, Rob Walker, received a $3 million wire transfer from CEFC in 2017. In turn, four Biden family members — Hunter, James, Hallie, and an unidentified “Biden” — received a collective $1.3 million cut from the $3 million wire transfer.
In addition, Breitbart News reported the Biden family business received a total of $5.1 million through multiple accounts within days of Hunter Biden’s WhatsApp messages to CEFC.
Shortly after demanding to be paid by an associate of CEFC with President Joe Biden “sitting” next to him, Hunter Biden asked a second CEFC business associate, Gongwen “Kevin” Dong, for $10 million in another WhatsApp text, noting the Biden family is best at “doing exactly what the chairman wants.”
“Very simple,” Hunter wrote. “10 M per annum budget to use to further the interest of the JV. This move to 5M is completely new to me and is not acceptable obviously.”
“If you think this is about money it’s not,” Hunter added. “The Bidens are the best I know at doing exactly what the chairman wants from this partnership … let’s not quibble over peanuts.”
The Biden family’s venture with CEFC is best known for including a stake of “10 held by H for the big guy.” Among others involved in the CEFC venture were James Biden, whistleblower Tony Bobulinski, and Jim Bulger.
The Biden Justice Department on Monday unsealed charges against an Israeli-American think tank official who provided the FBI with information in 2019 about the Biden family’s business dealings with China.
Federal prosecutors in Manhattan accused Gal Luft of covertly working for China and attempting to facilitate arms sales to Iran, Libya, and Qatar. Luft, the co-director of the Maryland-based Institute for the Analysis of Global Security, was arrested in Cyprus on Feb. 17, but skipped bail while facing extradition to the United States. U.S. Attorney Damian Williams and Justice Department assistant attorney general for national security Matthew Olsen, both Biden appointees, announced the charges against Luft.
Luft said after his arrest earlier this year that the Justice Department was targeting him because he provided information about the Bidens to the FBI and Justice Department in 2019.
"DOJ is trying to bury me to protect Joe, Jim & Hunter Biden," said Luft, who met with FBI agents and Justice Department officials in Brussels.
Luft’s allegations come as IRS whistleblowers accuse the Justice Department of stymying an investigation into Hunter Biden’s foreign business dealings. Hunter Biden entered a plea deal with federal prosecutors on misdemeanor tax charges for failure to pay taxes in 2017 and 2018. IRS whistleblower Gary Shapley, who worked on the investigation, said his team was prevented from fully investigating the sources of Hunter Biden’s income. Shapley also said that the FBI had national security concerns about Hunter Biden’s ties to CEFC China Energy, a Chinese energy conglomerate with extensive ties to Luft.
The Washington Free Beaconreported in March that Luft worked closely with CEFC China Energy, which gave his think tank $350,000 in grants. CEFC paid Hunter Biden at least $6 million in 2017 and 2018. The firm, which has suspected ties to Chinese military intelligence, gave Hunter Biden at least $5 million for business consulting, and another $1 million to provide legal services to Patrick Ho, a CEFC executive who was indicted for trying to bribe two African officials for oil rights.
Both Hunter Biden and Luft worked closely with Ho, who was convicted on bribery charges. Hunter Biden referred to Ho as the "fucking spy master of China" in audio recordings in 2018. Luft submitted a letter of support for Ho at his federal trial. A former employee of Ho’s told the Free Beacon that he was frequently accompanied by Luft at CEFC’s offices in New York.
House Oversight Committee chairman James Comer (R., Ky.), who is investigating the Biden family’s business ventures, has sought interviews with Luft. He said last week he plans to ask the FBI for documents related to Luft’s interviews with the FBI, which were conducted in Brussels.
Prosecutors charged Luft with violating the Foreign Agents Registration Act and Arms Export Control Act. They allege he violated the foreign agent law by commissioning articles in Chinese state media from a former U.S. government official.
While the official is not identified in the indictment, Luft recently said that he paid former CIA director James Woolsey to write opinion articles for China Daily. Woolsey was a founder of Luft’s think tank and spoke at numerous events with Patrick Ho, the CEFC China Energy executive.
“But to the extent there’s a suggestion, for example, that the FBI’s confidential human sources or FBI employees in someway instigated or orchestrated Jan 6th, that’s categorically false.” - Christopher Wray
How extensive was Deep State involvement in the January 6 “insurrection?”
The January 6 “insurrection” has been a propaganda bonanza for the Deep State. Would it have required exceptional foresight to predict the outcome of Trump supporters’ march on Washington. President Trump had held dozens of peaceful rallies during his campaign. Now his supporters had gone berserk. Or had they? Several anti-Trump groups had an interest in seeing violence on Jan 6. Radical leftist groups like Antifa and BLM would be vindicated to an extent. The Democrat party would gain support as a result of the violence. And even those federal government agencies controlled by the Deep State would benefit.
Christopher Wray claimed that FBI agents, "have not to date seen any evidence of anarchist violent extremists or people subscribing to Antifa in connection with the 6th.” This was an excellent opportunity for radical groups to discredit Trump supporters. Contrary to Wray’s claim at least one radical was exposed right from the beginning.
John Sullivan (Jayden X), dressed as a Trump supporter, shouted, “If we don’t get in, we’re going to burn this sh*t down!” as he approached the Capitol.
U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan, who so tenaciously sought to convict former national security adviser Michael Flynn, allowed Sullivan to be released from jail following his arrest. Defendants who peacefully walked around the Capitol building have been charged with “seditious conspiracy” which carries a 20-year prison sentence. Sullivan is presently working for the Ukranian government as some kind of war correspondent.
Democrat party organizations also saw January 6 as an opportunity to discredit Trump. Project Veritas recorded Scott Foval, national field director of Americans United for Change and Robert Creamer, founder of Democracy Advocates and the husband of Rep. Janice D. Schakowsky, Illinois Democrat, discussing their roles in planting paid agitators at campaign events for Donald Trump. Although Creamer stepped down and Foval was fired, that does not mean that they abandoned their efforts to discredit Trump.
One of the reasons the events of January 6 took place was because of an alleged intelligence failure. The impression was given that the government did not have informants among the groups planning to attack the Capitol. In March 2021 Senator Amy Klobuchar told Wray, “There must be moments where you think if we could have known, if we could have infiltrated this group or found out what they were doing. Do you have those moments?” Wray responded, “Absolutely ... we aim to bat a thousand percent and to thwart every attack that is out there ... you can be darn tootin’ that we are focused very, very hard on how we can get better sources, better information, better analysis, so that we can make sure that something like what happened on January 6 never happens again.”
This exchange has been used to suggest that the FBI did not have informants in these groups. It is almost too perfect and was quite possibly rehearsed. Like the 51 intelligence officials who claimed the Hunter laptop “has the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.” This was used to imply that the laptop was Russian disinformation while the officials could later deny that they were claiming it was. The truth is that several law enforcement agencies had dozens of agents and informants among the protesters. Steven Sund, Chief of the Capital Hill told Tucker Carlson the Jan 6 protest was filled with Federal agents.
These agents and informants frequently do not face charges. They are referred to as “unindicted co-conspirators.” According to Revolver News these “unindicted co-conspirators” often “appear to be much more aggressive” than other protesters. This has led Christopher Wray to assert, “the suggestion that the FBI’s confidential human sources or FBI employees in someway instigated or orchestrated Jan 6th, that’s categorically false.” Wray would be more believable if he had a history of providing accurate information to Congress. However, he repeatedly claims he has to be “very careful” about releasing information or he can’t answer because the matter is under investigation.
Initially the government refused to release the video tapes of the incident. They would not even trust their colleagues in the Boston field office . Retired Supervisory Intelligence Analyst George Hill from Boston Field Office testified that he was told by the Washington Field Office that they could not provide Boston with the tapes, “Because there may be’ – may be – ‘UCs,’ undercover officers, ‘or CHSes,’ confidential human sources, ‘on those videos whose identity we need to protect.”
Could these undercover agents be responsible for much of the violence on 6 Jan?
Revolver News details how the more violent plotters in the Gretchen Whitmer “kidnapping” plot (5 of 13) were government informants. The plotter who suggested using a bomb to blow up a bridge as part of that plot was an undercover FBI agent. Tucker Carlson reported that the government's own court filings reveal that enforcement officers participated in the riot, sometimes in violent ways. The New York Times has reported there have been twenty terrorist plots against the U.S. Three of those plots were real; the other 17 were created — and then stopped — by the FBI.
The government knew there would be violence because in many instances they are likely the ones who initiated it. They did nothing to prevent it. Sen. Gary Peters, chair of the Homeland Security Committee said to NBC News: "Given the number of news reports and social media posts indicating violence ahead of Jan. 6, the FBI absolutely should have seen this attack coming and should have informed law enforcement to be ready.” Rep. Eric Swalwell was warned by family and friends there would be violence. He commented, "They didn't have access to intelligence. But they did read the tweets from President Trump and his supporters. This was completely foreseeable.” There are a lot of questions about January 6. No one can say that the government has been open about what transpired. This has resulted in speculation that the government was involved.
John Dietrich is a freelance writer and the author of The Morgenthau Plan: Soviet Influence on American Postwar Policy (Algora Publishing). He has a Master of Arts Degree in International Relations from St. Mary’s University. He is retired from the Defense Intelligence Agency and the Department of Homeland Security. He is featured on the BBC's program "Things We Forgot to Remember:" Morgenthau Plan and Post-War Germany.
Seven times before law enforcement found cocaine smuggled into the White House, President Joe Biden promised to restore “integrity” and “decency” to the presidency.
Over the July 4th weekend, officials discovered cocaine stashed in the White House. The Secret Service has yet to reveal its findings of who smuggled the white powdery drug into one of the most secure buildings in the world. And the White House refuses to provide much insight into the growing scandal.
RELATED VIDEO — KJP Refuses to Answer If White House Cocaine Belongs to Bidens, Scolds Reporter:
C-SPAN
0 seconds of 1 minute, 59 secondsVolume 90%
The White House press team refuses to say whether or not the cocaine belonged to Joe or Hunter Biden, citing campaign law. They refuse to say if the White House will provide transparency on who the Secret Service potentially finds responsible for the drug. They also would not say if the White House supports prosecuting the unknown cocaine White House smuggler.
But before the cocaine scandal arose, Joe Biden and his campaign promised seven times to “restore” “integrity” and “decency” back to the White House. Over and over again, Biden promised to restore the “soul of the nation,” while claiming former President Donald Trump was the antithesis of integrity, decency, and transparency:
1) “It’s time we bring integrity back to the White House,” Biden announced on his Twitter page on August 20, 2020. He then went on to call out former President Trump’s “lack of integrity,” explaining that:
I will put the INTEGRITY of my whole CAREER IN PUBLIC SERVICE to this nation up against Trump’s LACK OF INTEGRITY any day of the week.
2) In October 2020, Biden teamed up with Vice President Kamala Harris in Phoenix to kick off their campaign bus tour, and, as she posted on her Twitter page, “to fight for our democracy and bring integrity back to the White House”:
3) In January 2020, Biden posted a video of an exchange between supporter “Vicky” and himself at a campaign event, along with the quote, “Like Vicky said, we need a president who will restore integrity to the White House.”
4) ABC News proudly posted a picture of Biden on their December 19, 2019, Twitter post along with a quote from Biden prefaced with the statement, “Joe Biden says [Trump’s] impeachment was a ‘constitutional necessity.'” The quote from Biden read:
“We need to restore the integrity of the presidency, of the office of the presidency … my job is to just go out and make the case why [Trump] doesn’t deserve to be president.”
5) In October 2019, Biden stated that, “President Trump is leading the most corrupt administration in modern American history,” and continued, saying:
It’s got to end.
We must restore integrity to our government and ensure our elected officials work for all Americans — not just the powerful.
6) “We need to restore honor and decency to the White House,” Biden said on September 6, 2020:
I ran for president for three reasons: To restore the soul and decency of our country. To rebuild our economy from the bottom up and the middle out. And to help unite our country.
We’re on the right track — but there’s still work to be done.
I’d be inclined to disagree with Don except for one thing: Biden has proven to be a very adept criminal mastermind. For decades, he has funneled millions of dollars to his children and siblings and, especially, to his debauched, deviant son, Hunter.
ANDREA WIDBURG
There it is. That's the issue. To begin, you have the corrupt family Biden. They've been scamming us and our system well for almost fifty years. The man is supposedly worth over 250 million dollars. How is this possible on his salary? It's not. So where did his wealth come from? Not from being a brilliant businessman. DAVID PRENTICE
The book is a devastating chronicle of political corruption. From Ukraine to Mexico to China, Hunter Biden's private correspondence shows how he and his family leveraged his father's position to win high-paying, low-work gigs with shady foreign actors—and how Joe's official actions at times directly benefited his family's financial backers. ALANA GOODMAN
Where there’s smoke, look for fire. Biden came from humble means,never worked in the private sector, but somehow became wildlywealthy. Several of Biden’s family members essentially work in thefamily business of apparent influence peddling. Does Biden’sfrequent refrain, “I never spoke with my son about his overseasbusiness deals” come to mind? It makes one wonder if “never”really means “never!”. Biden has nine relatives receiving millions inforeign cash. What were they talking about when Vice PresidentBiden and his cronies met 80 times at the White House? Veracity iseverything when you solicit the public’s trust, and Biden’s persona iswrapped around his supposed trustworthiness. However, the factshere point to a person who uses hyperbole, manipulation, andoutright lying to sway public opinion.
ALLAN J FEIFER
Biden, long known as Delaware’s “senator from DuPont,” Biden served on committees that were most sensitive to the interests of the ruling class, including the Judiciary Committee and the Foreign Relations Committee. He supported the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act in 1999, a milestone in the deregulation of the banks, and other right-wing measures. After nearly four decades in the Senate, Biden became Obama’s vice president, helping to oversee the massive bailout of Wall Street following the 2008 financial crisis and the subsequent restructuring of class relations to benefit the rich. That included the bailout of General Motors and Chrysler, based on a 50 percent cut in the pay of all newly hired autoworkers.
Biden Knew about Hunter’s Foreign Business Deals, Took $5 Million Bribe as V.P., Six in Ten Voters Say
A new survey of U.S. voters reveals that six in ten U.S. voters believe President Joe Biden was involved in his son Hunter’s dubious foreign business dealings, corroborating similar recent poll findings.
Fully 58% say it’s at least “somewhat” likely that “Joe Biden was involved in his son Hunter’s foreign business deals,” including 44% who call it “very” likely, according to results of a national Rasmussen survey of likely voters released on Thursday, July 6.
At least sixty percent of voters in all demographic categories – except Democrats, Blacks and those earning at least $200,000 – believe it’s likely that, as vice president, Joe Biden was involved in his son’s foreign business deals that delivered millions to members of the Biden family.
The results mirror those of a Harris poll conducted last month, in which 57% of U.S. registered voters said they “think Joe Biden took a $5 million bribe when he was Vice President.” What’s more, a majority said they don’t believe the FBI is fully investigating the corruption allegations against Pres. Biden:
57% of voters said Joe Biden took $5 million bribe as vice president.
Two-thirds (66%) of voters said Joe Biden lied by claiming he never discussed Hunter Biden’s foreign business dealings with his son.
55% said the FBI is “not really investigating” the possibility that Joe Biden took a $5 million bribe.
Although Republican and Democrat voters greatly disagreed, six in ten Independent voters said they think Biden took $5 million in bribes:
57% of Independents said Joe Biden took $5 million bribe as vice president.
Two-thirds (68%) of Independent voters said Joe Biden lied by claiming he never discussed Hunter Biden’s foreign business dealings with his son.
50% of Independent voters said the FBI is “not really investigating” the possibility that Joe Biden took a $5 million bribe.
The propaganda ministry is in full spin mode, trying to explain why Joe Biden is parading around the world with Hunter in tow. The two are together for state dinners, overseas junkets, and weekends at Camp David. As the narrative goes, Hunter is a troubled man, victimized by the demon of addiction. Any appearance of presidential impropriety is simply a loving father concerned about his son, holding him close to keep him out of trouble.
I say hogwash.
Organized crime bosses protect themselves from legal jeopardy by insulating themselves from the dirty work. They use underlings to sell their product, collect the money, launder the money, and if necessary take the fall. If a legal price is to be paid, it's paid by the expendables. The boss keeps them quiet with hush money, legal assistance, and witness intimidation.
Does anyone believe that a cartel boss helps an arrested underling out of love? Nope. He does it in service to his own selfish interests — which brings me to Hunter Biden's loving father, Joe.
We've learned a great deal about the Biden family business in the last three years from abandoned laptops, congressional investigations, and federal whistleblowers.
We know that Hunter was working on a deal with a Chinese energy company in which 10 percent would go to the "big guy." We learned from Hunter's business partner, Tony Bobulinski, that the "big guy" was Hunter's code name for his dad, Joe Biden. Oddly, Bobulinski was never interviewed by Biden's consigliere or his crew, the Department of Justice.
What was Hunter selling to the Chinese? We've learned that from WhatsApp text messages to Henry Zhao, the group chairman of China's Harvest Fund Management. He texted:
The Bidens are the best I know at doing exactly what the chairman wants from this [partnership].
Oddly, Hunter's communications with the Chinese never discuss any product or service other than access to Joe. I'm sure what "the Bidens are the best ... at" doesn't involve anything harmful to America — like granting his pal Xi Jinping permission to fly reconnaissance balloons over America.
But Hunter was involved in not only the sales side of the family business. He also did the dirty work of collections. In another message to Zhao, he texted:
I am sitting here with my father and we would like to understand why the commitment made has not been fulfilled. Tell the director that I would like to resolve this now before it gets out of hand, and now means tonight. And, Z, if I get a call or text from anyone involved in this other than you, Zhang, or the chairman, I will make certain that between the man sitting next to me and every person he knows and my ability to forever hold a grudge that you will regret not following my direction.
That was Hunter Biden giving a Chinese businessman, with ties to Chinese intelligence, an "or else" if they didn't pay up. Five million bucks arrived in the next few days.
But the Chinese weren't the only clients of Biden Inc. They also did extensive work (I'm using the term loosely) with Burisma in Ukraine. A whistleblower has come forward identifying evidence in FBI possession that the Bidens were working a side deal, while Joe was the vice president, to help Burisma Holdings out of some legal difficulties.
It seems Burisma needed a Ukrainian investigation to go away. Joe helped by threatening to withhold a billion dollars of U.S. aid if the Ukrainians didn't fire the prosecutor investigating Burisma. The Ukrainians complied, the investigation was terminated, and Hunter and Joe each received $5 million.
The whistleblower claims that the president of Burisma told him that he has audio recordings of his conversation with Joe — presumably as insurance to make sure the bribed stay bribed. We know that Joe did the deed, because he bragged about it at a Council for Foreign Relations meeting — on video. Maybe now we have a better idea about why he did the deed.
The Bidens created a vast network of shell companies to launder the money received. But ill gotten gains are still gains, and subject to taxation. Therefore, the IRS was following the money.
Investigators had to work their way through the maze of shell companies, which received money, divided it up, moved it around, and eventually deposited it in Biden family bank accounts. The investigation was a time-consuming process of subpoenaing records, fighting legal resistance, and moving to the next link in the money chain — hoping to reach the end before the statute of limitations expired. The investigators almost pulled it off — until they were told to stand down, ignore leads associated Joe Biden or the "big guy," and let Hunter off with a couple of misdemeanors for defrauding taxpayers of millions of dollars.
This is all ample evidence that in the Biden family business, Joe had the product, and Hunter took care of sales, collections, and distribution of the proceeds.
Does Joe love Hunter? Maybe so, but demonstrably not as much as Joe loves Joe.
Would a father who loves a son more than himself involve that son in a criminal enterprise that could land him in jail for decades?
Would a father who's concerned about his troubled son facilitate his access to easy money for drugs, strippers, and hookers?
Wouldn't a loving father try to separate his troubled son from the influences that corrupted him — rather than increase his exposure to temptations at state dinners, West Wing meetings, and overseas travel to meet with foreign businessmen?
Wouldn't a concerned father be able to keep drugs away from his addicted son in the most secure building in the world — the White House? However, we've learned that the White House was evacuated because a bag of cocaine was found in the West Wing. We've also learned that the Bidens have directed the White House staff to "lay off" Hunter Biden. Just how extensive was that directive? Did it include "laying off" stopping the first son from snorting cocaine in the West Wing?
Those are rhetorical questions. We know the answers, so spare me the "loving father" nonsense. Joe is the head of a criminal enterprise, selling government influence to the highest bidder, with complete disregard for America's interests. He used his son and other family members to do the dirty work of
selling the product (influence),
collecting the proceeds, and
laundering the money for use by the first family.
While they did that, Joe smiled for the cameras and worked to maintain the façade of returning normalcy to the White House.
But Hunter is no criminal mastermind, and he left far too much evidence of family misdeeds for the public to ignore. Now that Hunter has been caught, Joe is suddenly concerned about his troubled son? Baloney. Joe is running interference with the DOJ and keeping Hunter close to keep him quiet.
Nothing Joe Biden is doing is being done out of affection for his son. It's being done to save his own skin. He's doing what any other mob boss would do with an underling when the truth starts bubbling to the surface: keep him quiet at all costs. Some loving father.
IF JOE BIDEN IS AS SENILE AS HE IS STAGING HIMSELF, THEN HOW COULD HAVE ORCHESTRATED SUCH MASSIVE DAMAGE TO AMERICA IN SUCH SHORT OF TIME???
JOE BIDEN IS A LIAR, CON MAN AND GAMER LAWYER. THAT'S ALL HE'S EVER BEEN. HE WILL BOW OUT DUE TO SENILITY BUT ONLY RIGHT AFTER HE PARDONS HUNTER!
Biden, long known as Delaware’s “senator from DuPont,” Biden served on committees that were most sensitive to the interests of the ruling class, including the Judiciary Committee and the Foreign Relations Committee. He supported the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act in 1999, a milestone in the deregulation of the banks, and other right-wing measures. After nearly four decades in the Senate, Biden became Obama’s vice president, helping to oversee the massive bailout of Wall Street following the 2008 financial crisis and the subsequent restructuring of class relations to benefit the rich. That included the bailout of General Motors and Chrysler, based on a 50 percent cut in the pay of all newly hired autoworkers.
Brain Rage: Biden’s Violent Temper a Common Symptom of Dementia, Alzheimer’s
Tantrums so bad some staffers 'try to avoid meeting alone with him'
What happened: President Joe Biden terrifies White House aides with his "quick-trigger temper" and expletive-filled rants, Axiosreported on Monday.
• Examples of the president's foul-mouthed eruptions include: "God dammit, how the f—k don't you know this?!" "Don't f—king bulls—t me!" and "Get the f—k out of here!"
• Biden's temper tantrums are so bad some staff members "try to avoid meeting alone with him."
What it means: Increased anger and agitation are common symptoms of dementia and Alzheimer's disease, according to the National Institute on Aging (NIA).
• "People with Alzheimer’s disease may become agitated or aggressive as the disease gets worse," the NIA advises Alzheimer's caregivers on its website. "Try not to ignore the problem. Doing nothing can make things worse."
Why it matters: Biden, 80, is running for a second four-year term as president of the United States. Concerned citizens have repeatedly expressed alarm over the state of his physical and mental health.
• The president suffered a near-fatal fall last month at the Air Force Academy graduation ceremony in Colorado. Falls are the leading cause of injury-related death among Americans over the age of 65.
• In September of 2022, Biden attempted to converse with a congresswoman who died a month earlier. That episode is merely one of the most memorable examples of his innumerable brain-related gaffes.
• Biden may have exacerbated his risk of cognitive decline by neglecting to properly treat his longstanding sleep apnea, the Washington Free Beacon reported in June.
• Tucker Carlson heard members of Biden's family say "out loud that he had dementia," the former Fox News host told journalist Steve Krakauer.
Crucial context: Axios cofounder Jim VandeHei is also prone to fits of rage.
Be smart: Biden is not qualified to serve as commander in chief, and neither is Vice President Kamala Harris. Some of his allies are clearly worried he might die or become too incoherent to function on the campaign trail, which is why we are seeing leaks about his (probably) dementia-related temper, along with op-eds in the Atlantic urging the president to step aside in 2024.
Bottom line: Uh oh.
DOJ Indicts Gal Luft for FARA Violations with CEFC, Which Bankrolled Bidens
The Justice Department indicted the “missing” Biden family whistleblower, Dr. Gal Luft, for failing to register as a foreign agent of CEFC China Energy Co, the same company for which Hunter Biden worked.
Luft, who claims he is a fall guy, is a fugitive after skipping bail in Cyprus in April while awaiting extradition. Authorities charged Luft with conspiring to sell Chinese weapons to the UAE, Kenya, and Libya, violating the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), and making a false statement.
Luft claims he gave the incriminating evidence of Biden family wrongdoing about CEFC to the FBI and the DOJ in Brussels at a March 2019 meeting. He alleges U.S. authorities covered up the interview.
On Monday, the Justice Department brought multiple charges against Luft, including not registering as a foreign agent of CEFC, a FARA violation, page 21 of the inducement shows:
GAL LUFT, the defendant, and others known and unknown, at least one of whom is expected to be brought to and arrested in the Southern District of New York, willfully and knowingly did combine, conspire, confederate, and agree together and with each other to commit an offense against the United States, to wit, to knowingly and willfully act as an agent of a foreign principal, namely, CEFC, CEFC China, and CC-1, without registering with the Attorney General, in violation of FARA, 22 U.S.C. §§ 612 and 618.
Hunter Biden worked closely with CEFC. In fact, the “chairman” of CEFC, Ye Jianming, paid Hunter Biden a $1 million retainer fee for legal services in 2017. Hunter also received a large diamond from Ye in February 2017 worth an estimated $80,000.
Suspicious activity reports obtained by House Republicans show Hunter Biden’s business partner, Rob Walker, received a $3 million wire transfer from CEFC in 2017. In turn, four Biden family members — Hunter, James, Hallie, and an unidentified “Biden” — received a collective $1.3 million cut from the $3 million wire transfer.
In addition, Breitbart News reported the Biden family business received a total of $5.1 million through multiple accounts within days of Hunter Biden’s WhatsApp messages to CEFC.
Shortly after demanding to be paid by an associate of CEFC with President Joe Biden “sitting” next to him, Hunter Biden asked a second CEFC business associate, Gongwen “Kevin” Dong, for $10 million in another WhatsApp text, noting the Biden family is best at “doing exactly what the chairman wants.”
“Very simple,” Hunter wrote. “10 M per annum budget to use to further the interest of the JV. This move to 5M is completely new to me and is not acceptable obviously.”
“If you think this is about money it’s not,” Hunter added. “The Bidens are the best I know at doing exactly what the chairman wants from this partnership … let’s not quibble over peanuts.”
The Biden family’s venture with CEFC is best known for including a stake of “10 held by H for the big guy.” Among others involved in the CEFC venture were James Biden, whistleblower Tony Bobulinski, and Jim Bulger.
YOU REALLY GET THE IDEA OF HOW UTTERLY CORRUPT THE RULING CLASS IS WHEN YOU SEE WHAT JOE BIDEN AND HIS FAMILY OF GAMER LAWYERS HAVE GOTTEN AWAY WITH FOR 50 YEARS!!!
So Trump is to blame for the media's absence of interest in Biden and his scandals?
It is bad enough that Joe Biden blames President Trump for his incompetence and destructive policies.
It is much worse when the media, the politicized Justice Department, other government bureaucrats, and other Democrats collude to cover up the corruption of the Bidens, and seek to destroy Trump with lies and endless investigations and then blame Trump for their actions.
And they started trying to destroy Trump before he even took office.
At the Wall Street Journal's editorial page, Holman Jenkins wrote this:
The media and politicized Justice Department also saved Hillary from being prosecuted for her multiple crimes and looking into all the kickbacks to the Clinton family and foundation. They were so interested in beating Trump, before he was President, that they would do anything they had to to protect and elect Hillary and that is the same thing they are doing with Biden.
Look at how much fake stuff they have thrown at Trump over the last seven years:
How many times have they called Trump a racist, xenophobe, homophobe, Russian stooge, and dictator to disparage him while they campaigned for Hillary and Biden?
When Trump stopped people from traveling from China at the beginning of COVID, Biden and others called him a xenophobe and racist. Soon after that they disparaged Trump for reacting too slowly to COVID.
How many times was Trump called a racist for doing his job to enforce immigration laws passed by Congress? The media, entertainers, and other Democrats essentially stopped reporting on the border as soon as Biden took office. That shows the concerns for kids were fake and the attacks were political.
The media went as far as showing pictures of kids in cages during the Obama/Biden years and lied by saying they were happening because of Trump. They essentially would do anything to gin up racial hate and division against Trump.
Biden and others spread lies about what Trump said in Charlottesville to gin up hate and division. No matter how many times Trump denounced white supremacists, including at Charlottesville, Biden continues to spread the lie.
Even the USAToday fact-checkers found it problematic:
Sure, Donald Trump said there were 'fine people on both sides' but in the next breath he condemned 'neo-Nazis and White nationalists.' Don't leave that out.
Why don't the fact checkers call Biden out for lying whenever he repeats that lie? The answer is most don't care because they also like to gin up racial hate and division to keep the minority vote while they claim they care about uniting the country.
Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee created the fictional Russian dossier, and the media and other Democrats spread the lie for years that Trump colluded with Russia. to intentionally mislead the public.
Biden and others continue to lie that Trump's tax rate cuts cost the government trillions and only helped the rich. Trump's policies actually increased tax revenues substantially and were lifting all boats, especially those at the bottom, people Democrats always pretend they want to help.
As incomes grew, income inequality fell for the second consecutive year. Between 2017 and 2019, the Gini index of income inequality fell from 0.489 to 0.484. Over the same two-year period, the share of income held by the top 20 percent fell by 0.4 percentage points.
Incomes grew across the distribution, and poverty plummeted as a result. The official poverty rate fell to an all-time record low of 10.5 percent in 2019. Over 4 million people were lifted out of poverty between 2018 and 2019 for a 1.3 percentage point decrease. This was the largest reduction in poverty in over 50 years.
Minority groups led the way in poverty alleviation. Compared to the overall poverty rate reduction of 1.3 percentage points, black poverty fell by 2.0 percentage points, Hispanic poverty fell by 1.8 percentage points, and Asian poverty fell by 2.8 percentage points (see Figure 2). The poverty rate fell to an all-time record low for every race and ethnic group in 2019. Notably, the black poverty rate fell below 20 percent for the first time in history.
The media and other Democrats have had endless witch hunts about Trump's tax returns but have little to no interest in the Bidens' taxes despite knowing how they set up many shell corporations that seemed to have no business activity other than accepting and distributing kickbacks to many members of the Biden family. They don't want to see if Joe got any of the money.
When reporting on January 6th, the media and others routinely leave out that Trump said to march peacefully and patriotically to intentionally mislead the public.
What was Trump supposed to do? Just shut up and ignore the false attacks like a Republican squish would do or fight back?
Should he have ignored all the states that changed their election rules in 2020 without legislative approval?
Should he have ignored the election rigging by Mark Zuckerburg?
Should he ignore the clear politicization of the Justice Department?
Should he ignore the different treatment of Biden and Hillary on classified documents?
Does anyone believe that if Ron DeSantis, Tim Scott, or Nikki Haley were the Republican candidate that the media, the Justice Department, IRS, and other Democrats would have more interest in doing a deep investigation into the pure corruption of Hunter and Joe? If anyone believes that they have their head stuck in the sand.
It is bad enough that Biden blames Trump for things that he screws up. It is worse when a WSJ journalist blames Trump for the lack of interest of the media, Justice Department, IRS, and other Democrats in doing an investigation into the massive corruption of the Biden crime family.
It is no wonder that we have so many corrupt politicians who become rich while sucking off the public trough when journalists blame others for their lack of interest if they like their policies.
There is no excuse for the media to ignore the corrupt Justice Department and President no matter what Trump or anyone else has done. They essentially have become Democrat campaign workers interfering in all elections to infect the U.S with leftist policies which will lead to the collapse of the greatest country that ever existed.
The choice gets easier every day. Either vote for Trump or some other Republican or vote for who the media is campaigning for and continue the intentional destruction of America. At least with Trump we know we have a fighter. Many Republicans will cave or partially cave as they pretend that the appeasement of leftists will get them support. It won't.
The Biden Justice Department on Monday unsealed charges against an Israeli-American think tank official who provided the FBI with information in 2019 about the Biden family’s business dealings with China.
Federal prosecutors in Manhattan accused Gal Luft of covertly working for China and attempting to facilitate arms sales to Iran, Libya, and Qatar. Luft, the co-director of the Maryland-based Institute for the Analysis of Global Security, was arrested in Cyprus on Feb. 17, but skipped bail while facing extradition to the United States. U.S. Attorney Damian Williams and Justice Department assistant attorney general for national security Matthew Olsen, both Biden appointees, announced the charges against Luft.
Luft said after his arrest earlier this year that the Justice Department was targeting him because he provided information about the Bidens to the FBI and Justice Department in 2019.
"DOJ is trying to bury me to protect Joe, Jim & Hunter Biden," said Luft, who met with FBI agents and Justice Department officials in Brussels.
Luft’s allegations come as IRS whistleblowers accuse the Justice Department of stymying an investigation into Hunter Biden’s foreign business dealings. Hunter Biden entered a plea deal with federal prosecutors on misdemeanor tax charges for failure to pay taxes in 2017 and 2018. IRS whistleblower Gary Shapley, who worked on the investigation, said his team was prevented from fully investigating the sources of Hunter Biden’s income. Shapley also said that the FBI had national security concerns about Hunter Biden’s ties to CEFC China Energy, a Chinese energy conglomerate with extensive ties to Luft.
The Washington Free Beaconreported in March that Luft worked closely with CEFC China Energy, which gave his think tank $350,000 in grants. CEFC paid Hunter Biden at least $6 million in 2017 and 2018. The firm, which has suspected ties to Chinese military intelligence, gave Hunter Biden at least $5 million for business consulting, and another $1 million to provide legal services to Patrick Ho, a CEFC executive who was indicted for trying to bribe two African officials for oil rights.
Both Hunter Biden and Luft worked closely with Ho, who was convicted on bribery charges. Hunter Biden referred to Ho as the "fucking spy master of China" in audio recordings in 2018. Luft submitted a letter of support for Ho at his federal trial. A former employee of Ho’s told the Free Beacon that he was frequently accompanied by Luft at CEFC’s offices in New York.
House Oversight Committee chairman James Comer (R., Ky.), who is investigating the Biden family’s business ventures, has sought interviews with Luft. He said last week he plans to ask the FBI for documents related to Luft’s interviews with the FBI, which were conducted in Brussels.
Prosecutors charged Luft with violating the Foreign Agents Registration Act and Arms Export Control Act. They allege he violated the foreign agent law by commissioning articles in Chinese state media from a former U.S. government official.
While the official is not identified in the indictment, Luft recently said that he paid former CIA director James Woolsey to write opinion articles for China Daily. Woolsey was a founder of Luft’s think tank and spoke at numerous events with Patrick Ho, the CEFC China Energy executive.
“But to the extent there’s a suggestion, for example, that the FBI’s confidential human sources or FBI employees in someway instigated or orchestrated Jan 6th, that’s categorically false.” - Christopher Wray
How extensive was Deep State involvement in the January 6 “insurrection?”
The January 6 “insurrection” has been a propaganda bonanza for the Deep State. Would it have required exceptional foresight to predict the outcome of Trump supporters’ march on Washington. President Trump had held dozens of peaceful rallies during his campaign. Now his supporters had gone berserk. Or had they? Several anti-Trump groups had an interest in seeing violence on Jan 6. Radical leftist groups like Antifa and BLM would be vindicated to an extent. The Democrat party would gain support as a result of the violence. And even those federal government agencies controlled by the Deep State would benefit.
Christopher Wray claimed that FBI agents, "have not to date seen any evidence of anarchist violent extremists or people subscribing to Antifa in connection with the 6th.” This was an excellent opportunity for radical groups to discredit Trump supporters. Contrary to Wray’s claim at least one radical was exposed right from the beginning.
John Sullivan (Jayden X), dressed as a Trump supporter, shouted, “If we don’t get in, we’re going to burn this sh*t down!” as he approached the Capitol.
U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan, who so tenaciously sought to convict former national security adviser Michael Flynn, allowed Sullivan to be released from jail following his arrest. Defendants who peacefully walked around the Capitol building have been charged with “seditious conspiracy” which carries a 20-year prison sentence. Sullivan is presently working for the Ukranian government as some kind of war correspondent.
Democrat party organizations also saw January 6 as an opportunity to discredit Trump. Project Veritas recorded Scott Foval, national field director of Americans United for Change and Robert Creamer, founder of Democracy Advocates and the husband of Rep. Janice D. Schakowsky, Illinois Democrat, discussing their roles in planting paid agitators at campaign events for Donald Trump. Although Creamer stepped down and Foval was fired, that does not mean that they abandoned their efforts to discredit Trump.
One of the reasons the events of January 6 took place was because of an alleged intelligence failure. The impression was given that the government did not have informants among the groups planning to attack the Capitol. In March 2021 Senator Amy Klobuchar told Wray, “There must be moments where you think if we could have known, if we could have infiltrated this group or found out what they were doing. Do you have those moments?” Wray responded, “Absolutely ... we aim to bat a thousand percent and to thwart every attack that is out there ... you can be darn tootin’ that we are focused very, very hard on how we can get better sources, better information, better analysis, so that we can make sure that something like what happened on January 6 never happens again.”
This exchange has been used to suggest that the FBI did not have informants in these groups. It is almost too perfect and was quite possibly rehearsed. Like the 51 intelligence officials who claimed the Hunter laptop “has the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.” This was used to imply that the laptop was Russian disinformation while the officials could later deny that they were claiming it was. The truth is that several law enforcement agencies had dozens of agents and informants among the protesters. Steven Sund, Chief of the Capital Hill told Tucker Carlson the Jan 6 protest was filled with Federal agents.
These agents and informants frequently do not face charges. They are referred to as “unindicted co-conspirators.” According to Revolver News these “unindicted co-conspirators” often “appear to be much more aggressive” than other protesters. This has led Christopher Wray to assert, “the suggestion that the FBI’s confidential human sources or FBI employees in someway instigated or orchestrated Jan 6th, that’s categorically false.” Wray would be more believable if he had a history of providing accurate information to Congress. However, he repeatedly claims he has to be “very careful” about releasing information or he can’t answer because the matter is under investigation.
Initially the government refused to release the video tapes of the incident. They would not even trust their colleagues in the Boston field office . Retired Supervisory Intelligence Analyst George Hill from Boston Field Office testified that he was told by the Washington Field Office that they could not provide Boston with the tapes, “Because there may be’ – may be – ‘UCs,’ undercover officers, ‘or CHSes,’ confidential human sources, ‘on those videos whose identity we need to protect.”
Could these undercover agents be responsible for much of the violence on 6 Jan?
Revolver News details how the more violent plotters in the Gretchen Whitmer “kidnapping” plot (5 of 13) were government informants. The plotter who suggested using a bomb to blow up a bridge as part of that plot was an undercover FBI agent. Tucker Carlson reported that the government's own court filings reveal that enforcement officers participated in the riot, sometimes in violent ways. The New York Times has reported there have been twenty terrorist plots against the U.S. Three of those plots were real; the other 17 were created — and then stopped — by the FBI.
The government knew there would be violence because in many instances they are likely the ones who initiated it. They did nothing to prevent it. Sen. Gary Peters, chair of the Homeland Security Committee said to NBC News: "Given the number of news reports and social media posts indicating violence ahead of Jan. 6, the FBI absolutely should have seen this attack coming and should have informed law enforcement to be ready.” Rep. Eric Swalwell was warned by family and friends there would be violence. He commented, "They didn't have access to intelligence. But they did read the tweets from President Trump and his supporters. This was completely foreseeable.” There are a lot of questions about January 6. No one can say that the government has been open about what transpired. This has resulted in speculation that the government was involved.
John Dietrich is a freelance writer and the author of The Morgenthau Plan: Soviet Influence on American Postwar Policy (Algora Publishing). He has a Master of Arts Degree in International Relations from St. Mary’s University. He is retired from the Defense Intelligence Agency and the Department of Homeland Security. He is featured on the BBC's program "Things We Forgot to Remember:" Morgenthau Plan and Post-War Germany.
Seven times before law enforcement found cocaine smuggled into the White House, President Joe Biden promised to restore “integrity” and “decency” to the presidency.
Over the July 4th weekend, officials discovered cocaine stashed in the White House. The Secret Service has yet to reveal its findings of who smuggled the white powdery drug into one of the most secure buildings in the world. And the White House refuses to provide much insight into the growing scandal.
RELATED VIDEO — KJP Refuses to Answer If White House Cocaine Belongs to Bidens, Scolds Reporter:
C-SPAN
0 seconds of 1 minute, 59 secondsVolume 90%
The White House press team refuses to say whether or not the cocaine belonged to Joe or Hunter Biden, citing campaign law. They refuse to say if the White House will provide transparency on who the Secret Service potentially finds responsible for the drug. They also would not say if the White House supports prosecuting the unknown cocaine White House smuggler.
But before the cocaine scandal arose, Joe Biden and his campaign promised seven times to “restore” “integrity” and “decency” back to the White House. Over and over again, Biden promised to restore the “soul of the nation,” while claiming former President Donald Trump was the antithesis of integrity, decency, and transparency:
1) “It’s time we bring integrity back to the White House,” Biden announced on his Twitter page on August 20, 2020. He then went on to call out former President Trump’s “lack of integrity,” explaining that:
I will put the INTEGRITY of my whole CAREER IN PUBLIC SERVICE to this nation up against Trump’s LACK OF INTEGRITY any day of the week.
2) In October 2020, Biden teamed up with Vice President Kamala Harris in Phoenix to kick off their campaign bus tour, and, as she posted on her Twitter page, “to fight for our democracy and bring integrity back to the White House”:
3) In January 2020, Biden posted a video of an exchange between supporter “Vicky” and himself at a campaign event, along with the quote, “Like Vicky said, we need a president who will restore integrity to the White House.”
4) ABC News proudly posted a picture of Biden on their December 19, 2019, Twitter post along with a quote from Biden prefaced with the statement, “Joe Biden says [Trump’s] impeachment was a ‘constitutional necessity.'” The quote from Biden read:
“We need to restore the integrity of the presidency, of the office of the presidency … my job is to just go out and make the case why [Trump] doesn’t deserve to be president.”
5) In October 2019, Biden stated that, “President Trump is leading the most corrupt administration in modern American history,” and continued, saying:
It’s got to end.
We must restore integrity to our government and ensure our elected officials work for all Americans — not just the powerful.
6) “We need to restore honor and decency to the White House,” Biden said on September 6, 2020:
I ran for president for three reasons: To restore the soul and decency of our country. To rebuild our economy from the bottom up and the middle out. And to help unite our country.
We’re on the right track — but there’s still work to be done.
I’d be inclined to disagree with Don except for one thing: Biden has proven to be a very adept criminal mastermind. For decades, he has funneled millions of dollars to his children and siblings and, especially, to his debauched, deviant son, Hunter.
ANDREA WIDBURG
There it is. That's the issue. To begin, you have the corrupt family Biden. They've been scamming us and our system well for almost fifty years. The man is supposedly worth over 250 million dollars. How is this possible on his salary? It's not. So where did his wealth come from? Not from being a brilliant businessman. DAVID PRENTICE
The book is a devastating chronicle of political corruption. From Ukraine to Mexico to China, Hunter Biden's private correspondence shows how he and his family leveraged his father's position to win high-paying, low-work gigs with shady foreign actors—and how Joe's official actions at times directly benefited his family's financial backers. ALANA GOODMAN
Where there’s smoke, look for fire. Biden came from humble means,never worked in the private sector, but somehow became wildlywealthy. Several of Biden’s family members essentially work in thefamily business of apparent influence peddling. Does Biden’sfrequent refrain, “I never spoke with my son about his overseasbusiness deals” come to mind? It makes one wonder if “never”really means “never!”. Biden has nine relatives receiving millions inforeign cash. What were they talking about when Vice PresidentBiden and his cronies met 80 times at the White House? Veracity iseverything when you solicit the public’s trust, and Biden’s persona iswrapped around his supposed trustworthiness. However, the factshere point to a person who uses hyperbole, manipulation, andoutright lying to sway public opinion.
ALLAN J FEIFER
Biden, long known as Delaware’s “senator from DuPont,” Biden served on committees that were most sensitive to the interests of the ruling class, including the Judiciary Committee and the Foreign Relations Committee. He supported the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act in 1999, a milestone in the deregulation of the banks, and other right-wing measures. After nearly four decades in the Senate, Biden became Obama’s vice president, helping to oversee the massive bailout of Wall Street following the 2008 financial crisis and the subsequent restructuring of class relations to benefit the rich. That included the bailout of General Motors and Chrysler, based on a 50 percent cut in the pay of all newly hired autoworkers.
Biden Knew about Hunter’s Foreign Business Deals, Took $5 Million Bribe as V.P., Six in Ten Voters Say
A new survey of U.S. voters reveals that six in ten U.S. voters believe President Joe Biden was involved in his son Hunter’s dubious foreign business dealings, corroborating similar recent poll findings.
Fully 58% say it’s at least “somewhat” likely that “Joe Biden was involved in his son Hunter’s foreign business deals,” including 44% who call it “very” likely, according to results of a national Rasmussen survey of likely voters released on Thursday, July 6.
At least sixty percent of voters in all demographic categories – except Democrats, Blacks and those earning at least $200,000 – believe it’s likely that, as vice president, Joe Biden was involved in his son’s foreign business deals that delivered millions to members of the Biden family.
The results mirror those of a Harris poll conducted last month, in which 57% of U.S. registered voters said they “think Joe Biden took a $5 million bribe when he was Vice President.” What’s more, a majority said they don’t believe the FBI is fully investigating the corruption allegations against Pres. Biden:
57% of voters said Joe Biden took $5 million bribe as vice president.
Two-thirds (66%) of voters said Joe Biden lied by claiming he never discussed Hunter Biden’s foreign business dealings with his son.
55% said the FBI is “not really investigating” the possibility that Joe Biden took a $5 million bribe.
Although Republican and Democrat voters greatly disagreed, six in ten Independent voters said they think Biden took $5 million in bribes:
57% of Independents said Joe Biden took $5 million bribe as vice president.
Two-thirds (68%) of Independent voters said Joe Biden lied by claiming he never discussed Hunter Biden’s foreign business dealings with his son.
50% of Independent voters said the FBI is “not really investigating” the possibility that Joe Biden took a $5 million bribe.
The propaganda ministry is in full spin mode, trying to explain why Joe Biden is parading around the world with Hunter in tow. The two are together for state dinners, overseas junkets, and weekends at Camp David. As the narrative goes, Hunter is a troubled man, victimized by the demon of addiction. Any appearance of presidential impropriety is simply a loving father concerned about his son, holding him close to keep him out of trouble.
I say hogwash.
Organized crime bosses protect themselves from legal jeopardy by insulating themselves from the dirty work. They use underlings to sell their product, collect the money, launder the money, and if necessary take the fall. If a legal price is to be paid, it's paid by the expendables. The boss keeps them quiet with hush money, legal assistance, and witness intimidation.
Does anyone believe that a cartel boss helps an arrested underling out of love? Nope. He does it in service to his own selfish interests — which brings me to Hunter Biden's loving father, Joe.
We've learned a great deal about the Biden family business in the last three years from abandoned laptops, congressional investigations, and federal whistleblowers.
We know that Hunter was working on a deal with a Chinese energy company in which 10 percent would go to the "big guy." We learned from Hunter's business partner, Tony Bobulinski, that the "big guy" was Hunter's code name for his dad, Joe Biden. Oddly, Bobulinski was never interviewed by Biden's consigliere or his crew, the Department of Justice.
What was Hunter selling to the Chinese? We've learned that from WhatsApp text messages to Henry Zhao, the group chairman of China's Harvest Fund Management. He texted:
The Bidens are the best I know at doing exactly what the chairman wants from this [partnership].
Oddly, Hunter's communications with the Chinese never discuss any product or service other than access to Joe. I'm sure what "the Bidens are the best ... at" doesn't involve anything harmful to America — like granting his pal Xi Jinping permission to fly reconnaissance balloons over America.
But Hunter was involved in not only the sales side of the family business. He also did the dirty work of collections. In another message to Zhao, he texted:
I am sitting here with my father and we would like to understand why the commitment made has not been fulfilled. Tell the director that I would like to resolve this now before it gets out of hand, and now means tonight. And, Z, if I get a call or text from anyone involved in this other than you, Zhang, or the chairman, I will make certain that between the man sitting next to me and every person he knows and my ability to forever hold a grudge that you will regret not following my direction.
That was Hunter Biden giving a Chinese businessman, with ties to Chinese intelligence, an "or else" if they didn't pay up. Five million bucks arrived in the next few days.
But the Chinese weren't the only clients of Biden Inc. They also did extensive work (I'm using the term loosely) with Burisma in Ukraine. A whistleblower has come forward identifying evidence in FBI possession that the Bidens were working a side deal, while Joe was the vice president, to help Burisma Holdings out of some legal difficulties.
It seems Burisma needed a Ukrainian investigation to go away. Joe helped by threatening to withhold a billion dollars of U.S. aid if the Ukrainians didn't fire the prosecutor investigating Burisma. The Ukrainians complied, the investigation was terminated, and Hunter and Joe each received $5 million.
The whistleblower claims that the president of Burisma told him that he has audio recordings of his conversation with Joe — presumably as insurance to make sure the bribed stay bribed. We know that Joe did the deed, because he bragged about it at a Council for Foreign Relations meeting — on video. Maybe now we have a better idea about why he did the deed.
The Bidens created a vast network of shell companies to launder the money received. But ill gotten gains are still gains, and subject to taxation. Therefore, the IRS was following the money.
Investigators had to work their way through the maze of shell companies, which received money, divided it up, moved it around, and eventually deposited it in Biden family bank accounts. The investigation was a time-consuming process of subpoenaing records, fighting legal resistance, and moving to the next link in the money chain — hoping to reach the end before the statute of limitations expired. The investigators almost pulled it off — until they were told to stand down, ignore leads associated Joe Biden or the "big guy," and let Hunter off with a couple of misdemeanors for defrauding taxpayers of millions of dollars.
This is all ample evidence that in the Biden family business, Joe had the product, and Hunter took care of sales, collections, and distribution of the proceeds.
Does Joe love Hunter? Maybe so, but demonstrably not as much as Joe loves Joe.
Would a father who loves a son more than himself involve that son in a criminal enterprise that could land him in jail for decades?
Would a father who's concerned about his troubled son facilitate his access to easy money for drugs, strippers, and hookers?
Wouldn't a loving father try to separate his troubled son from the influences that corrupted him — rather than increase his exposure to temptations at state dinners, West Wing meetings, and overseas travel to meet with foreign businessmen?
Wouldn't a concerned father be able to keep drugs away from his addicted son in the most secure building in the world — the White House? However, we've learned that the White House was evacuated because a bag of cocaine was found in the West Wing. We've also learned that the Bidens have directed the White House staff to "lay off" Hunter Biden. Just how extensive was that directive? Did it include "laying off" stopping the first son from snorting cocaine in the West Wing?
Those are rhetorical questions. We know the answers, so spare me the "loving father" nonsense. Joe is the head of a criminal enterprise, selling government influence to the highest bidder, with complete disregard for America's interests. He used his son and other family members to do the dirty work of
selling the product (influence),
collecting the proceeds, and
laundering the money for use by the first family.
While they did that, Joe smiled for the cameras and worked to maintain the façade of returning normalcy to the White House.
But Hunter is no criminal mastermind, and he left far too much evidence of family misdeeds for the public to ignore. Now that Hunter has been caught, Joe is suddenly concerned about his troubled son? Baloney. Joe is running interference with the DOJ and keeping Hunter close to keep him quiet.
Nothing Joe Biden is doing is being done out of affection for his son. It's being done to save his own skin. He's doing what any other mob boss would do with an underling when the truth starts bubbling to the surface: keep him quiet at all costs. Some loving father.
We hear it all the time and it’s true: “How would the liberal media be treating this story if it was a Republican instead of a Democrat?”
The IRS whistleblowers in the Hunter Biden matter are ignored by the liberal media.
Biden steals thousands of classified documents -- without the authority to declassify them -- when he was a senator and vice-president and the story disappears.
FBI insiders bravely reveal the blatant pro-Democratic bias of the organization and their testimony is sloughed off.
Joe Biden commits one embarrassing verbal gaffe after another, demonstrating an unarguable diminution of mental acuity, and the video clips are nowhere to be seen on the mainstream stations.
James Comer finds one ironclad, tangible example after another of inappropriate, even illegal, financial dealings by the entire Biden family and Comer’s investigation is dismissed by the liberal media as unfounded hearsay.
Talk of the 2016 presidential election being stolen by President Trump from Hillary is hailed as heroic, patriotic protest, but presenting the mountains of indisputable evidence of 2020 election fraud committed by the Democrats against President Trump gets you branded as a traitor by the mainstream media.
This list of examples could go on and on, but for the sake of brevity and current relevance, we’ll leave it there. The mainstream media is totally biased in favor of the Democrats. The networks, CNN, MSNBC, NPR, late-night television, the major newspapers, and PBS are all vessels of liberal thought. The editors and correspondents at these organizations actively promote liberal positions and intentionally cast anything conservative in a negative light, especially if it has anything even remotely to do with President Trump.
The bigger issue is can anything be done to change the liberal media’s behavior. That’s the question. So far, the answer has been “no.”
There is a conservative organization called the Media Research Center that bills itself as “America’s Media Watchdog.” They are a good organization that does a lot of very valuable work. By far their biggest contribution to the news/media environment is the research and record-keeping functions they perform. They maintain innumerable (probably in the millions) files of media occurrences dating back decades and they are constantly monitoring the news and chronicling the coverage. When you see a report on TV that the “coverage of President Trump a month before the election was 91% negative” or that the “major networks devoted only 53 seconds of coverage to the Hunter laptop story,” chances are that was the MRC at work.
But unfortunately, The MRC is an after-the-fact “Ah ha!” organization. They do a great job of reporting and detailing out exactly what crimes the liberal media have committed, after they’ve already committed them. They will not and cannot go after the liberal media and get them to change their behavior before their next Kennedyesque transgression. So we are left with the Joy Reids, Jake Tappers, Joy Behars, and Jim Acostas continually spewing their insulting, tilted lies, totally uninhibited by any thought of being called to account for their behavior.
The key to behavior modification is negative, painful consequences. If the subject experiences a painful rebuke on a repeated basis, they learn to not continue that behavior. If a dog messes in the house and is met with a rolled-up magazine across the snoot every time, it soon learns not to mess in the house. If a lab rat is given the choice of getting a food pellet from two dispensers, one of which gives out a sharp electrical shock, the rat will learn in very short order not to use that dispenser and go to the other instead.
Who is handing out shocks to the liberal media for their repeatedly intentional dishonest reporting? Who is holding them to account when they refuse to cover a major story that redounds negatively to Democrats?
The feeling here is that unless specific reporters can be individually humiliated and made to feel distinct personal embarrassment, they will never change their behavior. Being called out by a conservative evening cable host doesn’t do any good, because the viewing audience is too small and that’s like preaching to the choir anyway.
Maybe a Kevin McCarthy or a Ted Cruz could hold a weekly press conference and list, by correspondent name and example, that week’s worst offenders, the biggest lies, the worst omissions. But this kind of plan runs the very real risk of not being covered by the liberal media, who are highly unlikely to report on bad acts by other “teammates.”
It’s a vicious cycle. The liberal media lie about conservatives, refuse to cover stories that are negative to Democrats, and therefore the average casually attentive swing voter never knows the real story. It’s a nice racket they’ve arranged for themselves. The liberal media rats have unfettered access to all the pain-free food pellet dispensers, without any shocks in sight.
Former Director of National Intelligence (DNI) John Ratcliffe in an exclusive interview with SiriusXM’s Breitbart News Saturday slammed the Justice Department’s light-handed treatment of Hunter Biden versus former President Donald Trump, suggesting it was to protect President Joe Biden.
“When we talk about why the Justice Department [and] the FBI are doing these crazy gymnastics to protect Hunter Biden, they need to protect Hunter Biden to protect Joe Biden,” Ratcliffe told host Breitbart News Washington Bureau Chief Matthew Boyle.
Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-TX) testifies before a Senate Intelligence Committee nomination hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington on May 5, 2020. (Andrew Harnik-Pool/Getty Images)
“Because I think if Hunter … the saying goes, a crack addict would sell out their mother to save themselves — and in this case, it would be his father. And I think that that’s a part of what we’re seeing here,” he said.
Ratcliffe said it was “not just Hunter Biden” who was receiving money from shady foreign business partners.
“It’s not just the president’s son, it’s the president’s brother. It’s the president’s daughter in law, it’s the President’s grandchildren — somewhere between $10 [million] and $40 million from entities in different foreign jurisdictions [to] include the CCP. These foreign transactions for which the Biden family has provided no products and no services,” he said.
Ratcliffe noted that it took five years for the Justice Department to investigate Hunter Biden, only returning two misdemeanors and a diversion on a gun violation, while it took the Justice Department only seven months to charge Trump over his handling of alleged classified documents.
“At the very same time, the very same Justice Department takes seven months to charge former President Trump — the President’s primary political opponent — with crimes that would put him away for 400 years. You line that up side-by-side, and it just sort of underscores the reality of what we’re talking about,” he said.
Ratcliffe said according to statistics gathered by Right on Crime, the Biden Justice Department has charged 4,000 users in possession (or people using a controlled substance possessing a firearm illegally), and only once has it recommended pretrial diversion.
RELATED VIDEO – “No!” Biden SNAPS at Reporter Asking About Involvement with Hunter’s “Shake Down” Text:
C-SPAN
0 seconds of 18 secondsVolume 90%
“Guess who that is? That’s Hunter Biden,” Ratcliffe said.
He also said the DOJ in its entire history has offered pretrial diversion in less than one percent of 189,000 cases for “restricted persons in possession,” which includes users of a controlled substance, felons in possession, and illegal aliens.
But, he said, “I think the more staggering statistic is only one out of 4,000 times, has this very same Justice Department shown this type of leniency and it’s for the president’s son.”
He contrasted that leniency with the fervor with which the DOJ pursued Trump for “Russian collusion” despite receiving intelligence that it was a smear by Hillary Clinton to hurt him him during the 2016 election.
“When I was in Congress, when we were asking questions about potential FISA abuse [and] spying on the Trump campaign, we were all told that was a bunch of nonsense, it was ridiculous … we were conspiracy theorists. But when I became DNI and had access to our very best intelligence, one of the first things I said was, ‘Well, I want to see everything we have on Russian collusion,'” he said.
“I learned that we didn’t have any intelligence on Russian collusion, because there wasn’t any what we had was intelligence — that the Hillary Clinton campaign created the Russia collusion hoax … what John Durham called the ‘Clinton intelligence plan,'” he added.
“There’s been so much talk about this perception of a two-tier system of justice, but it’s not a perception. It’s a reality,” he said.
Breitbart News Saturday airs on SiriusXM Patriot 125 from 10:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. Eastern.
The bigger issue is can anything be done to change the liberal media’s behavior. That’s the question. So far, the answer has been “no.”
No comments:
Post a Comment